Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 1992 Mar;74(2):134–137.

The influence of suturing and sepsis on the development of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

D P O'Leary 1, J B Coakley 1
PMCID: PMC2497540  PMID: 1567133

Abstract

Postoperative peritoneal adhesions are a major cause of morbidity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential contributions of suturing and sepsis to their formation in animals undergoing laparotomy. Suturing the peritoneum with plain catgut was associated with a high incidence of adhesions to the wound at 8 days (11/15), but this was significantly less at 25 days (5/15, P less than 0.04). Use of monofilament nylon, or non-suture, were each associated with a low incidence of adhesions. Wound strength was significantly greater at 25 days than at 8 days (P less than 0.0005), but did not differ between groups. In a separate experiment, bacterial infection, even in the absence of a particulate carrier, proved to be a potent cause of postoperative peritoneal adhesions (8/9, P = 0.02) compared with uninfected controls (3/10). Suturing the peritoneum in the presence of infection caused an especially high incidence of adhesions to the wound (8/9, P = 0.004 vs 2/10 unsutured). It is concluded that the lowest incidence of adhesions to the wound is likely to be obtained, both in uninfected and in infected cases, if the peritoneum is not sutured during closure of abdominal wounds, and that such an approach does not compromise wound strength.

Full text

PDF
134

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buckman R. F., Woods M., Sargent L., Gervin A. S. A unifying pathogenetic mechanism in the etiology of intraperitoneal adhesions;. J Surg Res. 1976 Jan;20(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(76)90075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dudley H. A. Layered and mass closure of the abdominal wall. A theoretical and experimental analysis. Br J Surg. 1970 Sep;57(9):664–667. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800570908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ELLIS H. The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions. An experimental study. Br J Surg. 1962 Jul;50:10–16. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18005021904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellis H., Heddle R. Does the peritoneum need to be closed at laparotomy? Br J Surg. 1977 Oct;64(10):733–736. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800641013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellis H. The cause and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971 Sep;133(3):497–511. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kapur M. L., Daneswar A., Chopra P. Evaluation of peritoneal closure at laparotomy. Am J Surg. 1979 May;137(5):650–652. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lichtenstein I. L., Herzikoff S., Shore J. M., Jiron M. W., Stuart S., Mizuno L. The dynamics of wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970 Apr;130(4):685–690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McAvinchey D. J., McCollum P. T., McElearney N. G., Mundinger G., Jr, Lynch G. Antiseptics in the treatment of bacterial peritonitis in rats. Br J Surg. 1983 Mar;70(3):158–160. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800700307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Menzies D., Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990 Jan;72(1):60–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Milligan D. W., Raftery A. T. Observations on the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesions: a light and electron microscopical study. Br J Surg. 1974 Apr;61(4):274–280. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800610406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. O'Leary J. P., Wickbom G., Cha S. O., Wickbom A. The role of feces, necrotic tissue, and various blocking agents in the prevention of adhesions. Ann Surg. 1988 Jun;207(6):693–698. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198806000-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Platt J., Jones R. A., Bucknall R. A. Intraperitoneal antiseptics in experimental bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg. 1984 Aug;71(8):626–628. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800710822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Räf L. E. Causes of abdominal adhesions in cases of intestinal obstruction. Acta Chir Scand. 1969;135(1):73–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stewardson R. H., Bombeck C. T., Nyhus L. M. Critical operative management of small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg. 1978 Feb;187(2):189–193. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197802000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES