Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 2004 Nov;82(3):293–310. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.82-293

Effects of cocaine on performance under fixed-interval schedules with a small tandem ratio requirement.

Jonathan W Pinkston 1, Marc N Branch 1
PMCID: PMC1285012  PMID: 15693524

Abstract

Daily administration of cocaine often results in the development of tolerance to its effects on responding maintained by fixed-ratio schedules. Such effects have been observed to be greater when the ratio value is small, whereas less or no tolerance has been observed at large ratio values. Similar schedule-parameter-dependent tolerance, however, has not been observed with fixed-interval schedules arranging comparable interreinforcement intervals. This experiment examined the possibility that differences in rate and temporal patterning between the two types of schedule are responsible for the differences in observed patterns of tolerance. Five pigeons were trained to key peck on a three-component multiple (tandem fixed-interval fixed-ratio) schedule. The interval values were 10, 30, and 120 s; the tandem ratio was held constant at five responses. Performance appeared more like that observed under fixed-ratio schedules than fixed-interval schedules. Effects of various doses of cocaine given weekly were then determined for each pigeon. A dose that reduced responding was administered prior to each session for 50 days. A reassessment of effects of the range of doses revealed tolerance. The degree of tolerance was similar across components of the multiple schedule. Next, the saline vehicle was administered prior to each session for 50 days to assess the persistence of tolerance. Tolerance diminished in all subjects. Overall, the results suggested that schedule-parameter-dependent tolerance does not depend on the temporal pattern of responding engendered by fixed-ratio schedules.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (228.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow D. H., Hersen M. Single-case experimental designs. Uses in applied clinical research. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973 Sep;29(3):319–325. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200030017003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baron A., Leinenweber A. Molecular and molar analyses of fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):11–18. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett James E. The emergence of behavioral pharmacology. Mol Interv. 2002 Dec;2(8):470–475. doi: 10.1124/mi.2.8.470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickel W. K., Higgins S. T., Kirby K., Johnson L. M. An inverse relationship between baseline fixed-interval response rate and the effects of a tandem response requirement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):211–218. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Capehart G. W., Eckerman D. A., Guilkey M., Shull R. L. A comparison of ratio and interval reinforcement schedules with comparable interreinforcement times. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jul;34(1):61–76. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoffman S. H., Branch M. N., Sizemore G. M. Cocaine tolerance: acute versus chronic effects as dependent upon fixed-ratio size. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):363–376. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hughes C. E., Branch M. N. Tolerance to and residual effects of cocaine in squirrel monkeys depend on reinforcement-schedule parameter. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Sep;56(2):345–360. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hughes K. M., Popi L., Wolgin D. L. Loss of tolerance to amphetamine-induced hypophagia in rats: homeostatic readjustment vs. instrumental learning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999 Sep;64(1):177–182. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00112-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johanson C. E., Fischman M. W. The pharmacology of cocaine related to its abuse. Pharmacol Rev. 1989 Mar;41(1):3–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Killeen P. Reinforcement frequency and contingency as factors in fixed-ratio behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):391–395. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nickel M., Alling K., Kleiner M., Poling A. Fixed-ratio size as a determinant of tolerance to cocaine: is relative or absolute size important? Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Oct;4(5):471–478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schama K. F., Branch M. N. Tolerance to effects of cocaine on schedule-controlled behavior: effects of fixed-interval schedule parameter. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Jan;32(1):267–274. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schneider B. A. A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):677–687. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schuster C. R., Dockens W. S., Woods J. H. Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance. Psychopharmacologia. 1966;9(2):170–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00404721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shull R. L. Sequential patterns in post-reinforcement pauses on fixed-interval schedules of food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):221–231. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stafford D., Branch M.N. Relations between dose magnitude, subject sensitivity, and the development of tolerance to cocaine-induced behavioral disruptions in pigeons. Behav Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;7(4):324–333. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199608000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stewart J., Badiani A. Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol. 1993;4(4):289–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolgin D. L., Hughes K. M. Role of behavioral and pharmacological variables in the loss of tolerance to amphetamine hypophagia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997 Aug;132(4):342–349. doi: 10.1007/s002130050354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zeiler M. D., Buchman I. B. Response requirements as constraints on output. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jul;32(1):29–49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Haaren F., Anderson K.G. Behavioral effects of acute and chronic cocaine administration in male and female rats: effects of fixed-ratio schedule parameters. Behav Pharmacol. 1994 Oct;5(6):607–614. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199410000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES