Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2006 Apr;172(4):2351–2358. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.048777

In Vivo Analysis of a Gain-of-Function Mutation in the Drosophila eag-Encoded K+ Channel

Robert J G Cardnell *,1, Damian E Dalle Nogare *, Barry Ganetzky , Michael Stern *
PMCID: PMC1456403  PMID: 16452147

Abstract

Neuronal Na+ and K+ channels elicit currents in opposing directions and thus have opposing effects on neuronal excitability. Mutations in genes encoding Na+ or K+ channels often interact genetically, leading to either phenotypic suppression or enhancement for genes with opposing or similar effects on excitability, respectively. For example, the effects of mutations in Shaker (Sh), which encodes a K+ channel subunit, are suppressed by loss-of-function mutations in the Na+ channel structural gene para, but enhanced by loss-of-function mutations in a second K+ channel encoded by eag. Here we identify two novel mutations that suppress the effects of a Sh mutation on behavior and neuronal excitability. We used recombination mapping to localize both mutations to the eag locus, and we used sequence analysis to determine that both mutations are caused by a single amino acid substitution (G297E) in the S2–S3 linker of Eag. Because these novel eag mutations confer opposite phenotypes to eag loss-of-function mutations, we suggest that eagG297E causes an eag gain-of-function phenotype. We hypothesize that the G297E substitution may cause premature, prolonged, or constitutive opening of the Eag channels by favoring the “unlocked” state of the channel.


NEURONAL excitability, the propensity for a neuron to fire an action potential in response to synaptic activity, is regulated in large part by K+ channels. Loss-of-function mutations in K+ channels in vivo confer phenotypes such as prolonged nerve terminal depolarization in response to nerve stimulation and spontaneous generation of action potentials (Ganetzky and Wu 1983; Wu et al. 1983; Warmke et al. 1991; Zhong and Wu 1991). Whereas it has been possible to overexpress and analyze in vivo-engineered versions of channels such as EKO (White et al. 2001), to date chromosomal K+ channel gain-of-function mutations have been identified only in organisms in which it is difficult to perform in vivo electrophysiological studies. Consequently, such mutant channels have been best characterized following expression in heterologous systems (Johnstone et al. 1997). As such, the effects of such mutations on behavior and neuronal function are unclear.

The first K+ channel gene cloned was the Drosophila Shaker (Sh) voltage-gated K+ channel. Sh was first identified on the basis of a behavioral phenotype in which Sh mutant adults shake their legs when under ether-induced anesthesia (Kaplan and Trout 1969). Sh mutants also exhibit increased neurotransmitter release at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction (nmj) (Jan et al. 1977) and an elimination of the rapidly inactivating K+ current IA (Wu and Haugland 1985). The Sh gene has also recently been suggested to play a special role in controlling Drosophila sleep (Cirelli et al. 2005).

It was found previously that combining the Sh133 mutation with other excitability mutations can result in either the suppression or the enhancement of the Sh133-induced phenotypes (Ganetzky and Wu 1982, 1983; Wu et al. 1983; Stern et al. 1990). For example, combining Sh133 with a loss-of-function mutation in a second voltage-gated K+ channel subunit encoded by ether-a-go-go (eag) enhances the Sh133-induced phenotypes (Wu et al. 1983). The roles played by Eag channel subunits in K+ currents are complex: Whereas Eag subunits alone are sufficient to form functional currents, it has also been proposed that Eag can contribute to multiple K+ currents in the larval muscle and in heterologous systems by heteromultimerization with other subunits such as Sh and slow-poke (slo) (Zhong and Wu 1991, 1993; Chen et al. 1996, 2000). Hence, we will refer to Eag channels. However, it is not known if Eag affects more than one current at the nmj.

Here we report the identification and characterization of two mutations (Sup39 and Sup146) that suppress the leg-shaking phenotype of Sh133. From recombination mapping, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, and sequencing we show that both mutations result in the same amino acid substitution (G297E) in the eag-encoded channel. Therefore we have renamed these suppressor mutations eagG297E. We assayed synaptic transmission at the nmj in eagG297E and found that this mutation suppresses the Sh133-induced increase in excitatory junctional potential (ejp) and that this effect is mediated presynaptically. Furthermore, eagG297E suppresses the increased neuronal excitability conferred by the K+ channel-blocking drugs 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and tetraethylammonium (TEA). As the phenotypes of the Sh133 mutation are enhanced by eag loss-of-function mutations (Wu et al. 1983), we hypothesize that eagG297E confers a gain-of-function phenotype. We further hypothesize that the G297E mutation might favor the unlocked state of the channel. The isolation of eagG297E provides a unique opportunity to test the phenotypes of hyperactive K+ channels in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drosophila stocks:

All fly stocks were maintained on standard cornmeal/agar Drosophila media at room temperature. The Sh133 allele is a dominant Sh allele described previously (Kaplan and Trout 1969; Jan et al. 1977) that produces a rapid leg-shaking phenotype when under ether anesthesia. para141 and para63 are alleles of para previously identified and characterized as part of this mutagenesis screen and are otherwise isogenic to Sup146 and Sup39, respectively (Stern et al. 1990). C(1)DX ywf is a compound (attached) X chromosome that will be represented as Inline graphicywf.

Behavioral tests:

Ether-induced leg shaking was assayed by exposing young adult flies to ether for ∼10 sec. Under these conditions, wild-type flies are immobilized except for occasional tarsal twitches; Sh133-mutant flies exhibit a rapid shaking of all six legs.

Mutagenesis:

Sh133 males were mutagenized by the addition of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to their food according to Lewis and Bacher (1968), except that 0.25% EMS was used. Following mutagenesis, the males were mated to an equivalent number of Inline graphicywf females with ∼25 mating pairs per bottle. After 4–5 days of mating, the males were removed and discarded. EMS was inactivated as described previously (Oshima and Takano 1980).

Mapping:

The map position of Sup39 and Sup146 was determined by recombination mapping, first between y (1A5) and f (15F4-7), then between g (12B4-6) and sd (13F1-4), and finally between two P[ry+] inserts located at 12E and 13B/C, respectively. The presence of Sup39 and Sup146 was scored in males by suppression of Sh133-induced leg shaking.

Sequencing:

All sequence analysis and alignments were produced using the BioEdit sequence alignment editor (Hall 1999). Primer pairs flanking partial, complete, or pairs of eag exons were designed and used for PCR amplification. Sequencing was performed using the same PCR primers, or in the case of longer products, with additional internal sequencing primers. All putative mutations were resequenced at least twice from separate PCR amplifications.

Electrophysiology:

Larval dissections and muscle recordings were performed as described previously (Jan and Jan 1976; Ganetzky and Wu 1982; Stern and Ganetzky 1989; Stern et al. 1995; Huang and Stern 2002). Ventral lateral longitidunal peripheral nerves that innervate the body-wall muscles were cut immediately posterior to the ventral ganglion and were stimulated using a suction electrode. Intracellular muscle recordings were made using a microelectrode pulled on a Flaming/Brown micropipette puller to tip resistances of 30–60 MΩ and filled with 3 m KCl. All dissections and recordings were performed at room temperature in standard saline solution (0.128 m NaCl, 2.0 mm KCl, 4.0 mm MgCl2, 0.34 m sucrose, 5.0 mm HEPES, pH 7.1, and CaCl2 as specified in the text). Duration of the ejp was measured from half-maximal response to half-maximal response. Ventral longitudinal muscle cell 6 was used for the recording of all electrophysiological parameters. Quinidine, 4-aminopyridine, and tetraethylammonium were applied following dissection as described previously (Jan et al. 1977; Singh and Wu 1989).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation of mutations that suppress the Sh leg-shaking phenotype:

To identify novel mutations that suppress the leg-shaking phenotype of Sh-mutants, males carrying Sh133 were mutagenized with EMS, as described in materials and methods, and crossed to Inline graphicywf females, and their sons were scored for an absence of leg shaking. Of 35,000 sons tested, 9 failed to shake their legs when etherized. Five of these suppressor mutations have previously been shown to be new alleles of para, which encodes a sodium channel subunit (Stern et al. 1990). Two additional suppressor mutations, Sup39 and Sup146, are reported here.

Mapping of Sup39 and Sup146:

The segregation patterns of these nine suppressors indicated that the mutations were all X-linked. Initial recombination mapping using the leg-shaking phenotype placed both Sup39 and Sup146 between the garnet (12B4-6) and scalloped (13F) loci and then to a region between two P[ry+] elements at positions 12E and 13B/C. Finally, we used RFLP analysis to localize Sup146 centromere-proximal to a PstI polymorphism in exon 1 of eag. The frequency of crossover between the leg-shaking suppression phenotype and the RFLP suggested that Sup146 is ∼30 kb from eag exon 1, which would place it within the eag locus (see Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map position of the Sup39 and Sup146 mutations. (A) Mapping of the suppressor mutations between P[ry+] elements at positions 12E and 13B. Direct genomic sequencing identified the substitution of a glutamate for a glycine at position 297, indicated by the pair of asterisks. Sup+ represents sequence from eag+ para63 and eag+ para141f. para63 and para141 are siblings of Sup39 and Sup146, respectively, generated by mutagenesis from the same isogenic wild-type X chromosome. (B) Schematic depicting the topology of the Eag protein. S1–S6 represent the six transmembrane domains, P the pore domain, and cNBD the cyclic nucleotide binding domain. The asterisk indicates the location of the G297E substitution identified in Sup39 and Sup146. Having shown Sup39 and Sup146 to be mutations in eag, we have subsequently renamed them eagG297E.

Sup39 and Sup146 are new alleles of eag:

To test the possibility that Sup39 and Sup146 are new alleles of eag, we sequenced genomic DNA from the 15 exons of eag from the suppressor mutations as well as from isogenic Sup+ flies. The eag sequence of Sup39 yielded only a single amino acid substitution: a glycine-to-glutamate change at position 297 (G297E; see Figure 1B). Interestingly, the eag sequence from Sup146 flies showed the identical G297E mutation as well as two additional mutations (A1088T and I1142T). To test the possibility that these two additional mutations were generated after the mutagenesis, while the fly line was being maintained, we sequenced these regions from a second Sup146 stock, which was split off from the first stock ∼6 months after Sup146 was obtained. We found that the G297E mutation was retained in this second Sup146 stock, but that the two additional mutations were absent. We conclude that Sup146, like Sup39, is a G297E mutation in eag; we will refer to both of them as eagG297E. We are not aware of any previous study that has assigned a function to G297. Previous studies have shown that eag loss-of-function mutations enhance the phenotypes of the Sh133 mutation (Wu et al. 1983). In contrast, eagG297E suppresses the phenotypes of the Sh133 mutation. We thus hypothesize that eagG297E is a gain-of-function allele (see Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Genetic interactions among Na+ and K+ channel mutations

Genotype Enhances Sh133 Suppresses Sh133
Para X
Dp para+ X
eag X
eagG297E X

The hypoexcitable para mutations suppress the Sh133-induced leg shaking (Stern et al. 1990), whereas hyperexcitable eag mutations and Dp para+ enhance the Sh133-induced leg shaking (Stern et al. 1990). eagG297E suppresses the Sh133-induced leg shaking, leading us to hypothesize that eagG297E is a gain-of-function mutation. Table was adapted from Huang and Stern (2002).

An alignment of the Eag protein sequence from several species (Figure 2) indicates that position 297 and the surrounding residues are highly conserved in all members of the Eag channel subfamily, but not in the Eag-like (Elk) or Eag-related (Erg) subfamilies. Interestingly, this region of Eag is close to the site at which Mg2+ ions interact with the channel to regulate its activity, a phenomenon not seen in either the Elk or the Erg subfamilies (Tang et al. 2000).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Sequence conservation in the S2–S3 loop of Eag. An alignment of the amino acid sequences corresponding to the S2 domain, the S3 domain, and the S2–S3 loop of Eag from a number of species. The S2 and S3 domains are boxed. Also indicated is the Dm–Eag position 297. Dm–Eag, Drosophila melanogaster (Warmke et al. 1991); Dp–Eag, Drosophila pseudobscura (Richards et al. 2005); M–Eag, mouse (Warmke and Ganetzky 1994); R–Eag1 (Ludwig et al. 1994), rat; B–Eag, Bos Taurus (bovine) (Frings et al. 1998); Ag–Eag, Anopheles gambiae (mosquito) (Mongin et al. 2004), H–Erg, human Eag-related gene (Warmke and Ganetzky 1994); Elk, human Eag-like K+ channel (Warmke and Ganetzky 1994). The Eag family has three branches: Eag, Erg, and Elk, all with slightly different properties. At the position indicated within the S2–S3 linker, a residue with a small, nonpolar side chain is conserved with the Eag subfamily.

eagG297E suppresses the increased amount and duration of neurotransmitter release conferred by Sh133:

In Sh133 mutants, motor axon excitability is increased, which leads to action-potential-triggered Ca2+ influx in the nerve terminal that is larger and more prolonged than that in wild type (Jan et al. 1977). This increased Ca2+ influx, in turn, leads to increased neurotransmitter release from the motor neuron and subsequent muscle depolarization that is increased in amplitude and duration compared to wild type. We hypothesize that eagG297E suppresses the Sh133-induced leg-shaking phenotype by reducing neuronal excitability, which would compensate for the increased excitability conferred by Sh133. If so, then eagG297E might suppress the increased neurotransmitter release conferred by Sh133. To test this possibility, we used the larval nmj preparation (Jan et al. 1977) to compare synaptic transmission at the larval nmj in eagG297E Sh133 and eag+ Sh133. With this preparation an action potential is induced in the motor axon and the consequent neurotransmitter release at the nmj elicits a depolarization in the muscle, the ejp, which is monitored with an intracellular recording electrode.

As neurotransmitter release is dependent upon Ca2+ influx into the nerve terminal, at low external [Ca2+] (such as 0.1 mm) at most only a single quantum of neurotransmitter is released into a wild-type neuromuscular junction following nerve stimulation. As a consequence, only failures or low amplitude ejps are observed (Jan and Jan 1976). The Sh133 mutant exhibits a prolonged nerve terminal depolarization, leading to prolonged neurotransmitter release and an ejp of increased duration and amplitude even at low [Ca2+] (Jan et al. 1977).

To determine if eagG297E can suppress the defects in synaptic transmission conferred by the Sh133 mutation, we compared ejps from eag+ Sh133 with ejps from eagG297E Sh133 (Figure 3). We found that the eagG297E allele from either the Sup39 or the Sup146 line partially suppresses the Sh133 phenotype in a dosage-dependent manner. Significant decreases in both ejp amplitude (P < 0.001) and duration (P < 0.001 for eagG297E from Sup39 and P < 0.05 for Sup146) were observed when the suppressor mutations were homozygous. When heterozygous, a moderate decrease in the Sh133-induced ejp amplitude, but not ejp duration, was observed (P < 0.02 for Sup146; Figure 3). The smaller suppressive effect in the heterozygotes indicates that dosage of eagG297E controls the degree of suppression observed.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Dosage-dependent suppression of Sh133 by eagG297E. (A) Averaged intracellular muscle recordings from larvae of the indicated genotypes in response to nerve stimulation. (B) Average amplitudes of ejps evoked by nerve stimulation in the presence of low bath [Ca2+] (0.1 mm) in larvae of the genotypes indicated. Under these low [Ca2+] conditions most successful wild-type ejps result from the release of at most a single vesicle of neurotransmitter. (C) Average duration of evoked ejps. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM; data were collected from at least five larvae for each genotype. 1, eag+ Sh+; 2, eag+ Sh133; 3, eagG297E (from Sup39) Sh133/eag+ Sh133; 4, eagG297E (from Sup39) Sh133; 5, eagG297E (from Sup146) Sh133/eag+ Sh133; 6, eagG297E (from Sup146) Sh133. *P < 0.05 by Student's t-test, **P < 0.02 by Student's t-test, ***P < 0.01 by Student's t-test vs. eag+ Sh133.

Similar suppression of Sh133-induced phenotypes has been observed previously by mutations in para and mlenap, which decrease the number of Na+ channels (Ganetzky and Wu 1985; Stern et al. 1990) and thus create hypoexcitable neurons. These observations support our hypothesis that eagG297E reduces neuronal excitability, a phenomenon that is presumably the result of conferring a gain-of-function phenotype on the Eag channels. A suppression of Sh133 could possibly be produced by increasing the number of Eag-containing channels in the neuronal membrane, similar to the enhancement of Sh133 seen with Dp para+ (Table 1). An alternative possibility is that this gain-of-function phenoptype is the result of premature, prolonged, or constitutive opening of the Eag channels.

When performed at higher [CaCl2] (0.4 mm), eagG297E does not decrease the amplitude or duration of Sh133 mutant ejps (data not shown). This result is not unexpected as the evoked ejp at this [CaCl2] is not significantly different in Sh mutants as compared to wild type (Jan et al. 1977). The absence of an effect by eagG297E in the presence of high [CaCl2] does suggest that muscle is not impaired in its response to neurotransmitters at the nmj.

eagG297E suppresses the enhancement of Sh-mutant ejp by quinidine:

The addition to the extracellular bath of 0.1 mm quinidine, a drug that selectively blocks IK in Drosophila larval muscles (Singh and Wu 1989), enhances the amplitude and duration of the action-potential-evoked ejp in Sh133 mutant larvae (Wu et al. 1989). To determine if eagG297E is able to suppress this enhancement of the Sh133 phenotype, ejp recordings were performed at 0.1 mm [Ca2+] and in the presence of 0.1 mm [quinidine]. As shown in Table 2, when homozygous, eagG297E is able to partially suppress the quinidine-enhanced Sh133 ejp phenotype.

TABLE 2.

Suppression of the Sh133-induced increase in neurotransmitter release by eagG297E: effects of quinidine

Excitatory junctional potential with quinidine
Genotype Amplitude (mV) Duration (msec)
eag+Sh133 23.4 ± 4.6 73.9 ± 10.8
eagG297E Sh133/eag+Sh133 (from Sup39) 13.9 ± 2.8 61.6 ± 15.9
eagG297E Sh133 (from Sup39) 4.7 ± 0.7*** 41.5 ± 8.2*
eagG297E Sh133/eag+Sh133 (from Sup146) 11.0 ± 2.0* 52.6 ± 12.5
eagG297E Sh133 (from Sup146) 4.4 ± 1.5*** 43.2 ± 10.8

Mean amplitudes and durations of ejps evoked by nerve stimulation in the presence of low bath [Ca2+] (0.1 mm) and 0.1 mm [quinidine] in larvae of the genotypes indicated. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM; data were collected from at least four larvae for each genotype. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.01 vs. eag+ Sh133.

If 0.1 mm [quinidine] blocks IK completely, how can eagG297E reduce the sensitivity of the motor neuron to quinidine? There are several possible explanations. First, while it is known that 0.1 mm [quinidine] nearly eliminates IK in Drosophila larval body-wall muscles (Singh and Wu 1989), it is not clear if it blocks IK specifically and completely in the motor neuron. Second, the G297E mutation might render Eag less sensitive to quinidine than eag+. This possibility is supported by the observation that mutations in human Eag can alter the binding characteristics of quinidine and other antiarrhythmic agents (Gessner et al. 2004). Third, the K+ channels distinct from IK in which Eag participates (IA, ICS, and ICF; Ganetzky and Wu 1983; Wu et al. 1983; Warmke et al. 1991; Zhong and Wu 1991) are not sensitive to quinidine, and it is possible that EagG297E exerts its effects through one of these channels.

eagG297E suppresses the neuronal excitability conferred by K+ channel-blocking drugs:

The eagG297E mutation does not appear to confer any obvious behavioral abnormality in an otherwise wild-type background. No temperature-sensitive paralysis is observed, the flies appear well coordinated, and flight appears normal. To determine if eagG297E confers a defect in synaptic transmission in an otherwise wild-type background, we made measurements of ejp amplitude and duration at 0.15 mm [CaCl2]. No significant decrease in either ejp amplitude or duration was observed (data not shown). Similarly, the onset rate of long-term facilitation (Jan and Jan 1978) was also unaffected by eagG297E (data not shown). The observation that eagG297E conferred no detectable excitability phenotype in a Sh+ background raised the possibility that the suppression of Sh133 by eagG297E might be an allele-specific restoration of Sh function. This possibility is supported by the observation that Eag and Sh subunits can co-assemble in a channel complex (Chen et al. 1996, 2000). To test this possibility, we examined the effects of eagG297E on the hyperexcitability conferred by two K+ channel-blocking drugs: 4-AP, which is a specific Sh channel blocker, and TEA, which is a more general voltage-gated K+ channel blocker (Ganetzky and Wu 1983; Yamamoto and Suzuki 1989).

We found that the amplitude of ejps evoked at 0.1 mm [CaCl2] and 2 mm [4-AP] was significantly suppressed by eagG297E (Table 3). Similarly, we found that large amplitude and prolonged ejps evoked at 0.1 mm [CaCl2] by addition of 10 mm [TEA] were easily induced in all wild-type larvae; in contrast, in eagG297E larvae it was possible to evoke such an ejp in only about half of the larvae tested (data not shown). Furthermore, as shown in Table 3, even when an ejp was successfully elicited, eagG297E reduced the amplitude and duration of the ejp in comparison with eag+. This suppression of the increased ejp conferred by 4-AP and TEA suggests that the G297E mutation increases the activity of the voltage-gated K+ channels that remain active following the addition of 4-AP and TEA and thus that the suppression of the Sh-induced increased ejp is not allele specific. Interestingly, it appears that eagG297E manifests its most obvious phenotypes under conditions that prolong the action potential.

TABLE 3.

Decreased neuronal excitability by eagG297E: effects of 4-AP and TEA

Excitatory junctional potential
4-AP
TEA
Genotype Amplitude (mV) Duration (msec) Amplitude (mV) Duration (msec)
eag+ 19.8 ± 3.2 29.9 ± 5.8 14.6 ± 3.0 490.5 ± 37.7
eagG297E (from Sup146) 10.3 ± 2.3* 39.8 ± 12.6 6.2 ± 1.4** 181.8 ± 64.7***

Mean amplitudes and durations of ejps evoked by nerve stimulation in the presence of low bath [Ca2+] (0.1 mm) and either 2 mm [4-AP] or 10 mm [TEA] in larvae of the genotypes indicated. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM; data were collected from at least five larvae for each genotype. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.002, ***P < 0.01 vs. eag+.

eagG297E acts presynaptically to reduce the ejp amplitude and duration:

The suppression of the Sh133-induced increased amplitude ejp conferred by eagG297E could be a consequence of a suppression of the increased neurotransmitter release of Sh133 mutants, of reduced sensitivity of the muscle membrane glutamate receptors to the neurotransmitter l-glutamate, or of increased voltage-dependent or voltage-independent K+ currents in the muscle membrane. To distinguish among these possibilities, we monitored synaptic transmission while holding the muscle membrane potential to −60 mV with a voltage clamp, which prevents the opening of voltage-gated ion channels such as Eag and Sh in the muscle membrane. If the eagG297E-dependent suppression of the Sh133-induced increase in ejp size is due to suppression of the increased neurotransmitter release, then we would expect that excitatory junctional currents (ejcs) of reduced amplitude would be observed in eagG297E Sh133 compared with eag+ Sh133. In contrast, if the suppression of the ejp amplitude phenotype is a result of altered muscle voltage-dependent K+ currents, then ejc amplitude in eagG297E Sh133 is expected to be the same as that in eag+ Sh133. Figure 4 shows that the ejc in eagG297E Sh133 is significantly smaller than that in eag+ Sh133, which is consistent with the notion that eagG297E acts presynaptically to suppress Sh133 phenotypes by decreasing the amount of neurotransmitter released. The proportional reduction in ejc amplitude (69%) is similar to the proportional reduction in ejp amplitude (73%).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The eagG297E mutation acts presynaptically to suppress the phenotypes of Sh133. (A) Typical ejcs in response to nerve stimulation in the presence of 0.1 mm [Ca2+]. Holding potential was −60 mV. Simultaneous intracellular recording of voltage (V) and current (I) were performed. (B) Average amplitude of evoked ejcs. eagG297E from Sup39. Values presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4. *P < 0.05 by Student's t-test.

To exclude the possibility that an altered voltage-independent current or altered sensitivity to l-glutamate is responsible for the suppression of the ejp phenotypes, we compared the amplitude of spontaneous miniature ejps (mejp) in eag+ Sh133 and eagG297E Sh133. If the eagG297E-dependent suppression of the Sh133-induced increased ejp amplitude is due to decreased muscle response to the neurotransmitter l-glutamate or to increased voltage-independent K+ currents, then mejps of reduced amplitude will be observed in eagG297E Sh133 compared to eag+ Sh133. We found that the mejp amplitudes recorded in eagG297E Sh133 and eag+ Sh133 are almost identical (0.79 mV ± 0.11 mV and 0.81 mV ± 0.14 mV, respectively), suggesting that eagG297E does not affect voltage-independent currents or the muscle response to l-glutamate. We conclude that eag39 acts presynaptically to suppress the effects of Sh133.

Suppression by eagG297E of the Sh133-induced increase in neuronal excitability requires extracellular Mg2+:

The S2 and S3 transmembrane domains of Eag contain three aspartic acid residues that coordinate the binding of a Mg2+ ion when the channel is in its closed state (Silverman et al. 2000; Tang et al. 2000; Schönherr et al. 2002). Mg2+ ions slow channel activation in a concentration- and voltage-dependent manner in bovine, mouse, and Drosophila Eag (Terlau et al. 1996; Schönherr et al. 1999; Silverman et al. 2000; Tang et al. 2000). The observation that the G297E substitution falls within the highly conserved S2–S3 linker raised the possibility that G297E acts by eliminating or reducing the effect of Mg2+. If so, then in the absence of extracellular Mg2+, neuronal excitability is predicted to be the same in eagG297E and eag+. To test this possibility, ejp recordings were performed in eagG297E Sh133 and eag+ Sh133 at low [Ca2+] in the absence of extracellular Mg2+ (Table 4). Table 4 shows that the ejp amplitude and duration are not as significantly different in eag+ Sh133 as in eagG297E Sh133. This observation supports the hypothesis that the regulatory effects of Mg2+ upon Eag have been lost in eagG297E and is consistent with the possibility that eagG297E increases Eag activity by reducing the affinity of Eag for Mg2+.

TABLE 4.

Suppression of the Sh133-induced increase in neurotransmitter release by eag39 and eag146 requires extracellular Mg2+

ejp
Genotype Amplitude (mV) Duration (msec)
eag+Sh133 9.4 ± 1.7 66.6 ± 21.3
eagG297E Sh133 (from Sup39) 7.6 ± 2.4 87.1 ± 10.5
eagG297E Sh133 (from Sup39) 6.7 ± 1.4 107.0 ± 29.2

Mean amplitudes and durations of ejps evoked by nerve stimulation in the absence of extracellular MgCl2 and in the presence of low bath [Ca2+] (0.1 mm) in larvae of the genotypes indicated. Values are presented as the mean ± SEM; data were collected from at least four larvae for each genotype.

The model of Mg2+ action upon Eag proposed by Schönherr et al. (2002) suggests that Mg2+ is involved in the switch between the resting (“locked”) and activated (“unlocked”) states. We suggest that the G297E mutation alters the configuration of the channel such that it favors the “unlocked” over the “locked” state. In vitro studies of this mutant channel would be required to test this possibility.

Our results suggest that the leg-shaking and electrophysiological phenotypes caused by the Sh133 mutation are suppressed in a dosage-dependent manner by eagG297E. Because phenotypes of eagG297E are opposite to those of eag loss-of-function mutants (Wu et al. 1983; Warmke et al. 1991; Bruggemann et al. 1993), we propose that these new mutations confer a gain-of-function phenotype to the Eag channels. Thus, eag activity regulates neuronal excitability: reduction in eag activity confers a hyperexcitable neuron, whereas increases in eag activity confer a hypoexcitabile neuron. A similar phenomenon occurs with the para-encoded Na+ channel: decreasing or increasing channel number produces hypoexcitable or hyperexcitable neurons, respectively (Stern et al. 1990). Given that eagG297E acts presynaptically, we hypothesize that the neuronal hypoexcitability effect is mediated by the premature, prolonged, or constitutive opening of the Eag channels in the motor neuron membrane, resulting in an attenuation of the action potential. Furthermore, our experiments raise the possibility that the reduction or elimination of the response to extracellular Mg2+ may be responsible for this gain-of-function phenotype of eagG297E.

Defects in K+ channel function cause a wide range of diseases termed “potassium channelopathies.” These channelopathies encompass diseases such as episodic ataxia (D'Adamo et al. 1999), myokymia (Dedek et al. 2001), epilepsy (Schroeder et al. 1998), arrhythmia (Sanguinetti 1999), and deafness (Van Hauwe et al. 2000). Furthermore, loss of normal K+ channel function can enhance tumor growth (Meyer and Heinemann 1998; Meyer et al. 1999; Pardo et al. 1999; Smith et al. 2002; Suzuki and Takimoto 2004). K+ channel gain-of-function mutations have been identified in patients with diseases such as familial atrial fibrillation (Chen et al. 2003) and have also been associated with the low prevalence of diseases such as diastolic hypertension in some populations (Fernandez-Fernandez et al. 2004). Polymorphisms such as eagG297E, if they exist in humans, might be of particular therapeutic importance because an individual carrying such a polymorphism might exhibit no overt abnormalities and yet show an aberrant sensitivity to particular therapeutic drugs. Consequently, understanding how K+ channels function, how they are regulated, and how they interact with other membrane components is of substantial importance. The identification of a gain-of-function mutation in a K+ channel gene that can be studied further both in vivo and in vitro provides a unique opportunity to obtain new knowledge of K+ channel regulation.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Chun-Fang Wu and Stephen Richards for comments on the manuscript, the Drosophila Stock Center in Bloomington, Indiana, for stocks, and Yanmei Huang for experimental assistance. This work was funded by National Institutes of Health grants RO1 NS39984 to M.S. and RO1 NS13590 to B.G.

References

  1. Bruggemann, A., L. A. Pardo, W. Stuhmer and O. Pongs, 1993. Ether-a-go-go encodes a voltage-gated channel permeable to K+ and Ca2+ and modulated by cAMP. Nature 365: 445–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, M. L., T. Hoshi and C. F. Wu, 1996. Heteromultimeric interactions among K+ channel subunits from Shaker and eag families in Xenopus oocytes. Neuron 17: 535–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, M. L., T. Hoshi and C. F. Wu, 2000. Sh and eag K(+) channel subunit interaction in frog oocytes depends on level and time of expression. Biophys. J. 79: 1358–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, Y. H., S. J. Xu, S. Bendahhou, X. L. Wang, Y. Wang et al., 2003. KCNQ1 gain-of-function mutation in familial atrial fibrillation. Science 299: 251–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cirelli, C., D. Bushey, S. Hill, R. Huber, R. Kreber et al., 2005. Reduced sleep in Drosophila Shaker mutants. Nature 434: 1087–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. D'Adamo, M. C., P. Imbrici, F. Sponcichetti and M. Pessia, 1999. Mutations in the KCNA1 gene associated with episodic ataxia type-1 syndrome impair heteromeric voltage-gated K(+) channel function. FASEB J. 13: 1335–1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dedek, K., B. Kunath, C. Kananura, U. Reuner, T. J. Jentsch et al., 2001. Myokymia and neonatal epilepsy caused by a mutation in the voltage sensor of the KCNQ2 K+ channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12272–12277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fernandez-Fernandez, J. M., M. Tomas, E. Vazquez, P. Orio, R. Latorre et al., 2004. Gain-of-function mutation in the KCNMB1 potassium channel subunit is associated with low prevalence of diastolic hypertension. J. Clin. Invest. 113: 1032–1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frings, S., N. Brull, C. Dzeja, A. Angele, V. Hagen et al., 1998. Characterization of ether-a-go-go channels present in photoreceptors reveals similarity to IKx, a K+ current in rod inner segments. J. Gen. Physiol. 111: 583–599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ganetzky, B., and C. F. Wu, 1982. Drosophila mutants with opposing effects on nerve excitability: genetic and spatial interactions in repetitive firing. J. Neurophysiol. 47: 501–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ganetzky, B., and C. F. Wu, 1983. Neurogenetic analysis of potassium currents in Drosophila: synergistic effects on neuromuscular transmission in double mutants. J. Neurogenet. 1: 17–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ganetzky, B., and C. F. Wu, 1985. Genes and membrane excitability in Drosophila. Trends Neurosci. 8: 322–326. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gessner, G., M. Zacharias, S. Bechstedt, R. Schönherr and S. H. Heinemann, 2004. Molecular determinants for high-affinity block of human EAG potassium channels by antiarrhythmic agents. Mol. Pharmacol. 65: 1120–1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall, T. A., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, Y., and M. Stern, 2002. In vivo properties of the Drosophila inebriated-encoded neurotransmitter transporter. J. Neurosci. 22: 1698–1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jan, L. Y., and Y. N. Jan, 1976. Properties of the larval neuromuscular junction in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Physiol. 262: 189–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jan, Y. N., and L. Y. Jan, 1978. Genetic dissection of short-term and long-term facilitation at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75: 515–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jan, Y. N., L. Y. Jan and M. J. Dennis, 1977. Two mutations of synaptic transmission in Drosophila. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 198: 87–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnstone, D. B., A. Wei, A. Butler, L. Salkoff and J. H. Thomas, 1997. Behavioral defects in C. elegans egl-36 mutants result from potassium channels shifted in voltage-dependence of activation. Neuron 19: 151–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaplan, W. D., and W. E. Trout, III, 1969. The behavior of four neurological mutants of Drosophila. Genetics 61: 399–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewis, E. B., and F. Bacher, 1968. Method of feeding ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) to Drosophila males. Dros. Inf. Serv. 43: 193. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ludwig, J., H. Terlau, F. Wunder, A. Bruggemann, L. A. Pardo et al., 1994. Functional expression of a rat homologue of the voltage gated ether a go-go potassium channel reveals differences in selectivity and activation kinetics between the Drosophila channel and its mammalian counterpart. EMBO J. 13: 4451–4458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyer, R., and S. H. Heinemann, 1998. Characterization of an eag-like potassium channel in human neuroblastoma cells. J. Physiol. 508(Pt. 1): 49–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer, R., R. Schönherr, O. Gavrilova-Ruch, W. Wohlrab and S. H. Heinemann, 1999. Identification of ether a go-go and calcium-activated potassium channels in human melanoma cells. J. Membr. Biol. 171: 107–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mongin, E., C. Louis, R. A. Holt, E. Birney and F. H. Collins, 2004. The Anopheles gambiae genome: an update. Trends Parasitol. 20: 49–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oshima, T., and I. Takano, 1980. Mutants showing heterothallism from a homothallic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisae. Genetics 94: 841–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pardo, L. A., D. del Camino, A. Sanchez, F. Alves, A. Bruggemann et al., 1999. Oncogenic potential of EAG K(+) channels. EMBO J. 18: 5540–5547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Richards, S., Y. Liu, B. R. Bettencourt, P. Hradecky, S. Letovsky et al., 2005. Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res. 15: 1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanguinetti, M. C., 1999. Dysfunction of delayed rectifier potassium channels in an inherited cardiac arrhythmia. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 868: 406–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schönherr, R., S. Hehl, H. Terlau, A. Baumann and S. H. Heinemann, 1999. Individual subunits contribute independently to slow gating of bovine EAG potassium channels. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 5362–5369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schönherr, R., L. M. Mannuzzu, E. Y. Isacoff and S. H. Heinemann, 2002. Conformational switch between slow and fast gating modes: allosteric regulation of voltage sensor mobility in the EAG K+ channel. Neuron 35: 935–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schroeder, B. C., C. Kubisch, V. Stein and T. J. Jentsch, 1998. Moderate loss of function of cyclic-AMP-modulated KCNQ2/KCNQ3 K+ channels causes epilepsy. Nature 396: 687–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Silverman, W. R., C. Y. Tang, A. F. Mock, K. B. Huh and D. M. Papazian, 2000. Mg(2+) modulates voltage-dependent activation in ether-a-go-go potassium channels by binding between transmembrane segments S2 and S3. J. Gen. Physiol. 116: 663–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Singh, S., and C. F. Wu, 1989. Complete separation of four potassium currents in Drosophila. Neuron 2: 1325–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Smith, G. A., H. W. Tsui, E. W. Newell, X. Jiang, X. P. Zhu et al., 2002. Functional up-regulation of HERG K+ channels in neoplastic hematopoietic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 18528–18534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stern, M., and B. Ganetzky, 1989. Altered synaptic transmission in Drosophila hyperkinetic mutants. J. Neurogenet. 5: 215–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stern, M., R. Kreber and B. Ganetzky, 1990. Dosage effects of a Drosophila sodium channel gene on behavior and axonal excitability. Genetics 124: 133–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Stern, M., N. Blake, N. Zondlo and K. Walters, 1995. Increased neuronal excitability conferred by a mutation in the Drosophila bemused gene. J. Neurogenet. 10: 103–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Suzuki, T., and K. Takimoto, 2004. Selective expression of HERG and Kv2 channels influences proliferation of uterine cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 25: 153–159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tang, C. Y., F. Bezanilla and D. M. Papazian, 2000. Extracellular Mg(2+) modulates slow gating transitions and the opening of Drosophila ether-a-Go-Go potassium channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 115: 319–338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Terlau, H., J. Ludwig, R. Steffan, O. Pongs, W. Stuhmer et al., 1996. Extracellular Mg2+ regulates activation of rat eag potassium channel. Pflugers Arch. 432: 301–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Hauwe, P., P. J. Coucke, R. J. Ensink, P. Huygen, C. W. Cremers et al., 2000. Mutations in the KCNQ4 K+ channel gene, responsible for autosomal dominant hearing loss, cluster in the channel pore region. Am. J. Med. Genet. 93: 184–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Warmke, J. W., and B. Ganetzky, 1994. A family of potassium channel genes related to eag in Drosophila and mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3438–3442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Warmke, J., R. Drysdale and B. Ganetzky, 1991. A distinct potassium channel polypeptide encoded by the Drosophila eag locus. Science 252: 1560–1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. White, B. H., T. P. Osterwalder, K. S. Yoon, W. J. Joiner, M. D. Whim et al., 2001. Targeted attenuation of electrical activity in Drosophila using a genetically modified K(+) channel. Neuron 31: 699–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu, C. F., and F. N. Haugland, 1985. Voltage clamp analysis of membrane currents in larval muscle fibers of Drosophila: alteration of potassium currents in Shaker mutants. J. Neurosci. 5: 2626–2640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu, C. F., B. Ganetzky, F. N. Haugland and A. X. Liu, 1983. Potassium currents in Drosophila: different components affected by mutations of two genes. Science 220: 1076–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, C. F., M. C. Tsai, M. L. Chen, Y. Zhong, S. Singh et al., 1989. Actions of dendrotoxin on K+ channels and neuromuscular transmission in Drosophila melanogaster, and its effects in synergy with K+ channel-specific drugs and mutations. J. Exp. Biol. 147: 21–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yamamoto, D., and N. Suzuki, 1989. Two distinct mechanisms are responsible for single K channel block by internal tetraethylammonium ions. Am. J. Physiol. 256: C683–C687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhong, Y., and C. F. Wu, 1991. Alteration of four identified K+ currents in Drosophila muscle by mutations in eag. Science 252: 1562–1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhong, Y., and C. F. Wu, 1993. Modulation of different K+ currents in Drosophila: a hypothetical role for the Eag subunit in multimeric K+ channels. J. Neurosci. 13: 4669–4679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES