Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1969 May;12(3):349–373. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-349

Controlling human fixed-interval performance1

Harold Weiner
PMCID: PMC1338595  PMID: 16811359

Abstract

Both high and relatively constant rates of responding without post-reinforcement pauses and lower rates with pauses after reinforcement are produced by human subjects under fixed-interval (FI) schedules. Such FI rates and patterns may be controlled when subjects are provided with different histories of conditioning and different conditions of response cost (reinforcement penalties per response). Subjects with a conditioning history under ratio schedules typically produce high and relatively constant rates of responding under FI schedules; this responding does not change systematically with changes in FI value. In contrast, subjects with a history under schedules which produce little or no responding between reforcements [such as differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) schedules] tend to pause after reinforcement and respond at low rates under FI schedules, whether or not they also have ratio conditioning histories; cost increases the likelihood of this type of performance. For DRL-history subjects, post-reinforcement pauses increase and response rates decrease as FI values increase.

Full text

PDF
349

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azrin N. H. Some Effects of Noise on Human Behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):183–200. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLAIR W. C. Measurement of observing responses in human monitoring. Science. 1958 Aug 1;128(3318):255–256. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3318.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cumming W. W., Schoenfeld W. N. Behavior under extended exposure to a high-value fixed interval reinforcement schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Aug;1(3):245–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HOLLAND J. G. Human vigilance: the rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections. Science. 1958 Jul 11;128(3315):61–67. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3315.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HOLLAND J. G. Technique for behavioral analysis of human observing. Science. 1957 Feb 22;125(3243):348–350. doi: 10.1126/science.125.3243.348-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Laties V. G., Weiss B. Effects of a concurrent task on fixed-interval responding in humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):431–436. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Long E. R. Additional techniques for producing multiple-schedule control in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5(4):443–455. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Long E. R. Chained and tandem scheduling with children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):459–472. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Long E. R., Hammack J. T., May F., Campbell B. J. Intermittent reinforcement of operant behavior in children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Oct;1(4):315–339. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ORLANDO R., BIJOU S. W. Single and multiple schedules of reinforcement in developmentally retarded children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Oct;3:339–348. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ORLANDO R. Component behaviors in free operant temporal discrimination. Am J Ment Defic. 1961 Mar;65:615–619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WEINER H. Operant programming with transistorized digital elements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:193–195. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. WEINER H. RESPONSE COST EFFECTS DURING EXTINCTION FOLLOWING FIXED-INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT IN HUMANS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:333–335. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WEINER H. Some effects of response cost upon human operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:201–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weiner H. Conditioning history and maladaptive human operant behavior. Psychol Rep. 1965 Dec;17(3):935–942. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.3.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weiner H. Real and imagined cost effects upon human fixed-interval responding. Psychol Rep. 1965 Oct;17(2):659–662. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.2.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zeiler M. D. Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):405–414. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES