Abstract
Schedule-controlled lever pressing and schedule-induced licking were studied in rats under a multiple fixed-interval fixed-interval schedule of food reinforcement. Following acquisition of stable rates of pressing and licking, a multiple variable-time variable-time schedule of electric-shock delivery was superimposed upon the baseline schedule. In only one component of the multiple schedule, a 5-sec stimulus preceded each shock (signaled shock). In the other component shock was unsignaled. Several shock intensities (Experiment 1) and body weights (Experiment 2) were studied. Lever pressing and licking were affected similarly by experimental manipulations, although with parametric differences. Depending upon shock intensity and body weight, rates of lever pressing and licking were hardly suppressed, suppressed primarily in the unsignaled shock component (differential suppression), or markedly suppressed in both components. Differential suppression during components with signaled and unsignaled shock and conditioned suppression of responding during the preshock stimulus appeared not to be functionally related. Differential suppression depended more on the discriminability of shock-free time, and on shock intensity, body weight, and the type of response than on the “preparatory” behavior preceding shock.
Keywords: signaled shock, response suppression, differential suppression, lever pressing, schedule-induced licking, rats
Full text
PDF










Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- FALK J. L. Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermittent food schedule. Science. 1961 Jan 20;133(3447):195–196. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3447.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falk J. L. The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiol Behav. 1971 May;6(5):577–588. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(71)90209-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freed E. X., Hymowitz N. Effects of schedule, percent body weight, and magnitude of reinforcer on acquisition of schedule-induced polydipsia. Psychol Rep. 1972 Aug;31(1):95–101. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1972.31.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hymowitz N. Comparisons between variable-interval and fixed-interval schedules of electric shock delivery. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):101–111. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hymowitz N. Effects of electric-shock delivery on schedule-induced water intake: delay of shock, shock intensity, and body-weight loss. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):269–280. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hymowitz N. Effects on responding of mixed and multiple schedules of signalled and unsignalled response-dependent electric-shock delivery. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):321–326. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hymowitz N., Freed E. X. Effects of response-dependent and independent electric shock on schedule-induced polydipsia. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):207–213. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacquet Y. F. Schedule-induced licking during multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):413–423. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perkins C. C., Jr An analysis of the concept of reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1968 Mar;75(2):155–172. doi: 10.1037/h0025509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seligman M. E. Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Oct;66(2):402–411. doi: 10.1037/h0026355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seligman M. E., Meyer B. Chronic fear and ulcers in rats as a function of the unpredictability of safety. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Nov;73(2):202–207. doi: 10.1037/h0030219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]