Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1978 Feb;88(2):357–366. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.2.357

Modes of Selection Maintaining an Inversion Polymorphism in DROSOPHILA PAULISTORUM

Mark H Gromko 1, Rollin C Richmond 1
PMCID: PMC1213806  PMID: 17248800

Abstract

The possibility that fitness relationships associated with an inversion polymorphism in D. paulistorum were frequency dependent was investigated. Using allozymes of tetrazolium oxidase to mark inversions, the effects of genotype frequency, larval density, and culture conditions on fitness were assessed. The proportions of genotypes among egg-laying females were varied, thus changing the expected proportions of progeny produced in the absence of fecundity or viability selection. The genotypes of progeny were determined by electrophoresis and comparisons of the ratio of the numbers of the different genotypes produced to the expected ratio was used to evaluate fitness relationships. Fitness relationships were dependent on genotype frequency, larval density, and culture conditions. Selection was either absent, directional, frequency dependent (favoring rare types), or heterotic depending on density and culture conditions. It is implied that the adaptive value of genetic variants need not be apparent in all environments, or may change with changing conditions. There is evidence for different criteria for selection in the two sexes. These results add to the evidence supporting the importance of frequency-dependent selection. It is argued that for frequency dependence to be of general importance, selection must act on genes in groups, either as an inversion or as lengths of chromosome with integrity maintained by disequilibrium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (689.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson W. W., Watanabe T. K. Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1974 Jul;77(3):559–564. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.3.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker W. K. Linkage disequilibrium over space and time in natural populations of Drosophila montana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Oct;72(10):4095–4099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.4095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bundgaard J., Christiansen F. B. Dynamics of polymorphisms. I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Jul;71(3):439–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.3.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DOBZHANSKY T., PAVLOVSKY O. A comparative study of the chromosomes in the incipient species of the Drosophila paulistorum complex. Chromosoma. 1962;13:196–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00326571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ehrman L. Mating success and genotype frequency in Drosophila. Anim Behav. 1966 Apr-Jul;14(2):332–339. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(66)80093-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Franklin I., Lewontin R. C. Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics. 1970 Aug;65(4):707–734. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.4.707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang S. L., Singh M., Kojima K. A Study of Frequency-Dependent Selection Observed in the Esterase-6 Locus of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Using a Conditioned Media Method. Genetics. 1971 May;68(1):97–104. doi: 10.1093/genetics/68.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Inoki R., Kojima S., Tamari Y., Yamamoto I. Effects of nicotine on salivary amylase secretion from rabbit parotid gland. Br J Pharmacol. 1971 Feb;41(2):285–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1971.tb08029.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kojima K., Yarbrough K. M. FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION AT THE ESTERASE 6 LOCUS IN Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Mar;57(3):645–649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Powell J. R. Genetic polymorphisms in varied environments. Science. 1971 Dec 3;174(4013):1035–1036. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4013.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Templeton A. R., Sing C. F., Brokaw B. The unit of selection in Drosophila mercatorum. I. The interation of selection and meiosis in parthenogenetic strains. Genetics. 1976 Feb;82(2):349–376. doi: 10.1093/genetics/82.2.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wills C., Crenshaw J., Vitale J. A computer model allowing maintenance of large amounts of genetic variability in mendelian populations. I. Assumptions and results for large populations. Genetics. 1970 Jan;64(1):107–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/64.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES