Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1979 Jul;92(3):1005–1021. doi: 10.1093/genetics/92.3.1005

Population Genetic Consequences of Feeding Habits in Some Forest Lepidoptera

Charles Mitter 1,2, Douglas J Futuyma 1,2
PMCID: PMC1214029  PMID: 17248935

Abstract

By surveying variation at allozyme loci in several phytophagous lepidopteran species (Geometridae), we have tested two hypotheses about the relationship of genetic variation to environmental heterogeneity: (1) that allozyme polymorphisms may exist because of associations between genotypes and "niches" (different host plants, in this instance), and (2) that the overall genetic variation of a species is correlated with environmental heterogeneity (or breadth of the species' overall ecological niche).—Genetic differentiation among samples of oligophagous or polyphagous species taken from different host species was observed in one of three species, at only one of seven polymorphic loci. The data thus provide no evidence for pronounced genetic substructuring, or "host race" formation in these sexually reproducing species, although host plant-genotype associations in a parthenogenetic moth give evidence of the potential for diversifying selection.—In a comparison of allozyme variation in polyphagous ("generalized") and oligophagous ("specialized") species, heterozygosity appeared to be higher in specialized species, at all polymorphic loci but one. It is possible that this unexpected result arises from a functional relation between breadth of diet and genetic variation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Levinton J. Genetic variation in a gradient of environmental variability: marine bivalvia (Mollusca). Science. 1973 Apr 6;180(4081):75–76. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4081.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewontin R. C., Ginzburg L. R., Tuljapurkar S. D. Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism. Genetics. 1978 Jan;88(1):149–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/88.1.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lewontin R. C., Hubby J. L. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1966 Aug;54(2):595–609. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McDonald J. F., Ayala F. J. Genetic response to environmental heterogeneity. Nature. 1974 Aug 16;250(467):572–574. doi: 10.1038/250572a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Milkman R. D. Heterosis as a major cause of heterozygosity in nature. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):493–495. doi: 10.1093/genetics/55.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mitton J. B., Koehn R. K. Population genetics of marine pelecypods. 3. Epistasis between functionally related isoenzymes of Mytilus edulis. Genetics. 1973 Mar;73(3):487–496. doi: 10.1093/genetics/73.3.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Powell J. R. Genetic polymorphisms in varied environments. Science. 1971 Dec 3;174(4013):1035–1036. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4013.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES