Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1991 Fall;24(3):487–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-487

Reactivity in self-recording: obtrusiveness of recording procedure and peer comments.

K C Kirby 1, S A Fowler 1, D M Baer 1
PMCID: PMC1279599  PMID: 1752838

Abstract

Reactivity refers to behavior change that occurs during self-recording without specific programming of consequences. We analyzed the effects of obtrusiveness of recording procedure and peer comments on reactivity to self-recording. Three first-grade students in Experiment 1 completed math questions during a 5-min work period. When we gave the children recording devices and told them to try to complete more questions than the highest number they had previously completed, math performance increased, as did the number of verbalizations about it. Two children showed more reactivity when they used the more obtrusive recording device. Because the increase in math performance corresponded closely to increases in peer comments, we manipulated peer comments directly in Experiment 2. Four second-grade students completed a math task and an alphabet task. Three of the students showed increased math performance during periods when peer comments occurred compared to periods when peer comments did not occur. Although the data from the math task suggested that peer comments can enhance reactivity, we did not observe this relationship with the alphabet task. These results suggest that the conditions necessary to produce desirable results through self-recording are complex and contextually specific.

Full text

PDF
487

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ballard K. D., Glynn T. Behavioral self-management in story writing with elementary school children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Winter;8(4):387–398. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Herbert E. W., Baer D. M. Training parents as behavior modifiers: self-recording of contingent attention. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Summer;5(2):139–149. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sainato D. M., Strain P. S., Lefebvre D., Rapp N. Effects of self-evaluation on the independent work skills of preschool children with disabilities. Except Child. 1990 Apr;56(6):540–549. doi: 10.1177/001440299005600605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schloss P. J., Thompson C. K., Gajar A. H., Schloss C. N. Influence of self-monitoring on heterosexual conversational behaviors of head trauma youth. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1985;6(3):269–282. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(85)90001-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Van Houten R., Hill S., Parsons M. An analysis of a performance feedback system: the effects of timing and feedback, public posting, and praise upon academic performance and peer interaction. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Winter;8(4):449–457. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zegiob L., Klukas N., Junginger J. Reactivity of self-monitoring procedures with retarded adolescents. Am J Ment Defic. 1978 Sep;83(2):156–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES