Skip to main content
Clinical Cardiology logoLink to Clinical Cardiology
. 2007 Feb 26;30(Suppl 1):I-10–I-15. doi: 10.1002/clc.20047

The burden of angina pectoris and its complications complications

Eric Peterson 1,
PMCID: PMC6652933  PMID: 18373325

Abstract

Between 10 to 30% of patients with coronary disease still suffer from symptoms of agina pectoris in contemporary clinical practice. this article summarizes analytic tools for measuring angina, as well as, its prevalence based on community based surveys, registries and in randomized controlled trials. Additionally, the impact of angina symptoms on patients' survival rates, functional status, quality of life and health‐related costs is reviewed. The effectiveness of treatment, revascularization and medical therapies, on reducing angina symptoms is also reviewed. Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome, angioplasty, angina, angina pectoris, CABG, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, chest pain, coronary artery stenosis, depression, Duke Activity Status Index, myocardial ischemia, percutaneous coronary intervention, Rose Angina Questionnaire, Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Specific Activity Scale

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (449.5 KB).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Seneca LA. Opera, Basileae, Epistle 55, 1529; also quoted by Allbutt C In Diseases of the Arteries Including Angina Pectoris, vol. 2, p 319 London: MacMillan, 1915. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. The Life of Edward, Earl of Clarendon, Lord High Chancellor of England and Chancellor of University of Oxford. Oxford: Continuation of History of Grand Rebellion, 1857. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rose GA, Blackburn H. Cardiovascular survey methods. Geneva World Health Organ Monogr 1986; 56–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Campeau L. Grading of angina pectoris [letter]. Circulation 1976; 54: 522–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook EF, Loscalzo A. Comparative reproducibility and validation of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation 1981; 64: 1227–1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hlatky M, Boineau RE, Higgenbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al: A brief self‐administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke activity scale index). Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 651–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Prodzinski J, et al.: Development and evaluation of the Seattle angina questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 333–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. AHA Heart and Stroke Facts. Accessed online on Aug 8 2006 at, http://www.acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/guidelines/stable/stable_clean.pdf.
  • 9. Daly CA, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, et al.: The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 996–1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Health Survey for England. Accessed online Aug 8, 2006 at, http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1056719919740#5Facts2003text.pdf.
  • 11. Janzon M, Levin LA, Swahn E. Invasive treatment in unstable coronary artery disease promotes health‐related quality of life: results from the FRISC II trial. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 114–q21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Melsop KA, Brooks MM, Mark DB, et al.: Medical costs and quality of life 10 to 12 years after randomization to angioplasty or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 2004; 110: 1960–1966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Brorsson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, Werko L. Quality of life of chronic stable angina 4 years after coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery. J Intern Med 2001; 249: 47–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gandhi MM, Lampe FC, Wood DA. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and short‐term prognosis of angina pectoris. Br Heart J 1995; 73: 193–198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Spertus JA, Jones PG, McDonnell M, Fan V, Finn SD, et al.: Health status predicts long‐term outcomes in outpatients with coronary disease. Circulation 2002; 106: 43–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hemingway H, McCallum A, Shipley H, Manderbacka K, Martikainen P, et al.: Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA 2006; 295: 1404–1411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pepine CJ, Abrams J. Marks RG for the TIDES Investigators Characteristics of a contemporary population with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 226–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Melsop KA, Boothroyd DB, Hlatky MA. Quality of life and time trade‐off utility measures in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 36–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Marquis P, Fayol C, Joire JE. Clinical validation of a quality of life questionnaire in angina pectoris patients. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 1554–1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Seed P, Treasure T, Hampton JR. Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. Circulation 1996; 94: 135–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Brorsson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, Werko L. Quality of life of patients with chronic stable angina before and four years after coronary revascularization compared with a normal population. Heart 2002; 87: 140–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wandell PE, Brorsson B. Assessing sexual functioning in patients with chronic disorders by using a generic health‐related quality of life questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 1081–1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ruo B, Rumsfeld JS, Hlatky MA, Liu H, Browner WS, et al.: Depressive symptoms and health‐related quality of life: the Heart and Soul Study. JAMA 2003; 290: 215–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Karlsson I, Rasmussen C, Ravin J, Thiis JJ, Pettersson G, et al.: Chest pain after coronary artery bypass: relation to coping capacity and quality of life. Scand Cardiovasc J 2002; 36: 41–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gibbons RJ, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Douglas JS, Finn SD, et al.: ACC/AHA/ACP‐ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the ACC/AHA task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 2092–2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Spertus JA, Salisbury AC, Jones PG, Conaway DG, Thompon RC, et al.: Predictors of quality‐of‐life benefit after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2004; 110: 3789–3794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Veenstra M, Pettersen KI, Rollag A, Stavem K. Association of changes in health‐related quality of life in coronary heart disease with coronary procedures and socioeconomic characteristics. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 56–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Clayton T, Lyman GH, Chamberlain DA, et al.: Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or continued medical treatment for angina: three year follow‐up in the RITA‐2 Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 907–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Beinart SC, Sales AE, Spertus JA, Plomondon ME, Every NR, et al.: Impact of angina burden and other factors on treatment satisfaction after acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 646–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Herrick JB. Clinical features of sudden obstruction of the coronary arteries. JAMA 1912; 59: 2015–2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES