Abstract
Background
National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines have been used to define treatment goals in patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, epidemiology‐based guidelines are unable to identify all subjects with coronary artery disease for aggressive lipid intervention.
Objective
We sought to evaluate the additive value of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography to the NCEP guideline classification for lipid treatment.
Methods
Multislice computed tomography was performed in 114 consecutive patients (mean age 57 ± 14 y; 59% male) without known coronary artery disease. Subjects were classified into 3 categories (low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk) according to their Framingham risk scores (FRS).
Results
Traditional cardiac risk factors were common: hypertension 59%, diabetes 13%, and smoking 22%. On the basis of the FRS, 11% (n= 12/114) of the patients met high‐risk criteria requiring aggressive cholesterol reduction. Of those in the low‐ and intermediate‐risk groups, MSCT found coronary plaque in 76% (n= 77/102), with moderate or severe plaque in 38% (n=39/102), thus reclassifying them in the high‐risk category. Use of statin drugs increased from 32% at baseline to 53% (p= 0.002) based on MSCT results; statin dose was increased in 31% of the patients who were already on a statin. The mean low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐c) decreased from 114 mg/dL to 91 mg/dL after MSCT (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Multislice computed tomography reclassifies a high percentage of patients considered to be low‐ to intermediate‐risk into the high‐risk category based on their coronary artery lesions. Thus, the rise in MSCT use at present may have a large impact on clinician practice patterns in lipid‐lowering therapy. Copyright © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: tomography, X‐ray, computed, risk factors, hypercholesterolemia, practice guidelines
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (191.5 KB).
References
- 1. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) : Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143–3421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Khot UN, Khot MB, Bajzer CT, Sapp SK, Ohman EM, et al.: Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease. JAMA 2003; 290: 898–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, Ferencik M, Hoffmann U, et al.: Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast‐enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment‐based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2004; 9: 14–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, et al.: Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97: 1837–1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Kastrati A, Martinoff S, et al.: Prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques by 64‐slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 312–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Nikolaou K, Sagmeister S, Knez A, Klotz E, Wintersperger BJ, et al.: Multidetector‐row computed tomography of the coronary arteries: predictive value and quantitative assessment of non‐calcified vessel‐wall changes. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2505–2512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Taylor AJ, Bindeman J, Feuerstein I, Cao F, Brazaitis M, et al.: Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three‐year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) project. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 807–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kopp AF, Schroeder S, Baumbach A, Kuettner A, Georg C, et al.: Non‐invasive characterisation of coronary lesion morphology and composition by multislice CT: first results in comparison with intracoronary ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1607–1611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. O'Malley PG, Feuerstein IM MD, Taylor AJ: Impact of electron beam tomography, with or without case management, on motivation, behavioral change, and cardiovascular risk profile. JAMA 2003; 289: 2215–2223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fonarow GC: In‐hospital initiation of statin therapy in acute coronary syndromes: Maximizing the early and long‐term benefits. Chest 2005; 128: 3641–3651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]