Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Cytotechnology logoLink to Cytotechnology
. 1998 Nov;28(1-3):101–109. doi: 10.1023/A:1008029715765

Attachment and growth of anchorage-dependent cells on a novel, charged-surface microcarrier under serum-free conditions

James Varani 1,✉, Felicia Piel 2, Sean Josephs 2, Ted F Beals 2, William J Hillegas 2
PMCID: PMC3449842  PMID: 19003412

Abstract

The present study describes a novel microcarrier substrate consisting of a swellable, copolymer of styrene and divinylbenzene, derivatized with trimethylamine. The co-polymer trimethylamine microcarriers support the growth of a number of different cell lines – Madin Darby Bovine Kidney, Madin-Darby Canine Kidney, Vero and Cos-7 – under serum-free conditions, and human diploid fibroblasts in serum-containing medium. Cells attach to the co- polymer trimethylamine microcarriers as rapidly as they attach to other charged-surface microcarriers (faster than they attach to collagen-coated polystyrene microcarriers) and spread rapidly after attachment. All of the cells examined grow to high density on the co- polymer trimethylamine microcarriers. Furthermore, cells are readily released from the surface after exposure to a solution of trypsin/EDTA. In this respect, the co-polymer trimethylamine microcarriers are different from other charged-surface microcarriers. Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney cells grown on this substrate support production of vaccine strain infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus as readily as on other charged-surface or collagen-coated microcarriers. Thus, the co-polymer trimethylamine microcarriers combine the positive characteristics of the currently available charged-surface and adhesion-peptide coated microcarriers in a single product. The viral vaccine production industry is undergoing considerable change as manufacturers move toward complete, animal product-free culture systems. This novel substrate should find application in the industry, especially in processes which depend on viable cell recovery.

Keywords: cell lines, diploid fibroblasts, microcarriers, serum-free culture

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (109.2 KB).

References

  1. Gebb C, Clark JM, Hirtenstein MD. Alternate surface for microcarrier culture of animal cells. Dev Biol Standards. 1982;50:93–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Giard DJ, Thilly WG, Wang DIC. Virus production with a newly-developed microcarrier system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977;34:668–672. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.6.668-672.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ginsburg I. Cationic polyelectrolytes: A new look at their possible role as opsinins, as stimulators of the respiratory burst in leukocytes, in bacteriolysis and as modulators of immune complex disease. Inflammation. 1987;11:489–495. doi: 10.1007/BF00915991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Keese O, Giaever I. Cell growth on liquid microcarriers. Science. 1983;219:1448–1449. doi: 10.1126/science.6828872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nielson V, Johnson A. Biosilon: Optimal culture conditions and various research scale culture techniques. Dev Biol Stand. 1980;46:131–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Obrenovitch A, Maintier C, Sene C. Microcarrier culture of fibroblastic cells on modified trisacryl beads. Biol Cell. 1982;46:249–256. [Google Scholar]
  7. Plantefaber LC, Hynes RO. Changes in integrin receptors on oncogenically transformed cells. Cell. 1989;56:281–290. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90902-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ruoslahti E and Pierschbacher MD (1986) Arg-Gly-Asp: A versitile cell recognition signal. Cell 44517-518. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Swartz MA. Signaling by integrins; implications for tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 1993;53:1503–1506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tamm I, Kikuchi T, Wang E, Pfeffer LM. Growth rate of control and b-interferon-treated human fibroblast populations over the course of their in vitrolife-spans. Cancer Res. 1984;44:2291–2296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Wezel AL. Growth of cell strains and primary cells on microcarriers. Nature. 1967;216:65–66. doi: 10.1038/216064a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Varani J, Dame M, Beals TF, Wass JA. Growth of three established cell lines on glass microcarriers. Biotech Bioengineer. 1983;25:1359–1372. doi: 10.1002/bit.260250515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Varani J, Bendelow MJ, Chun JH, Hillegas WJ. Cell growth on microcarriers: Comparison of proliferation on and recovery from various substrates. J Biol Stand. 1986;14:331–336. doi: 10.1016/0092-1157(86)90020-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Varani J, Fligiel SEG, Inman DR, Helmreich DL, Bendelow MJ, Hillegas WJ. Substrate-dependent differences in production of extracellular matrix molecules by squamous carcinoma cells and diploid fibroblasts. Biotech Bioengineer. 1989;33:1235–1241. doi: 10.1002/bit.260331003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Varani J, Inman DR, Fligiel EGS, Hillegas WJ. Use of recombinant and synthetic peptides as attachment factors for cells on microcarriers. Cytotechnology. 1993;13:89–98. doi: 10.1007/BF00749935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Varani J, Fligiel SEG, Inman DR, Beals TF, Hillegas WJ. Modulation of adhesive properties of DEAE dextran with laminin. J Biomaterials Res. 1995;23:993–997. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820290811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cytotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES