Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine
. 1935 Jan;28(3):319–332. doi: 10.1177/003591573502800330

Pharmacology and Nerve-endings (Walter Ernest Dixon Memorial Lecture)

(Section of Therapeutics and Pharmacology)

Henry Dale
PMCID: PMC2205701  PMID: 19990108

Abstract

A brief account is given of the scientific career of Walter Ernest Dixon, and of the importance of his work and his influence for the development of Pharmacology in England. It is suggested that the Memorial Lecture may appropriately deal with some matter of new interest, from one of the fields of research in which Dixon himself was active. Special mention is made of his work with Brodie on the physiology and pharmacology of the bronchioles and the pulmonary blood-vessels, as probably showing the beginning of Dixon's interest in the actions of the alkaloids and organic bases which reproduce the effects of autonomic nerves.

An account is given of Dixon's early interest in the suggestion, first made by Elliott, that autonomic nerves transmit their effects by releasing, at their endings, specific substances, which reproduce their actions; and of his attempt to obtain experimental support for this conception. After the War it was established by the experiments of O. Loewi; and it is now generally recognized that parasympathetic effects are so transmitted by release of acetylcholine, sympathetic effects by that of a substance related to adrenaline.

Very recent evidence indicates that acetylcholine, by virtue of its other (“nicotine-like”) action, also acts as transmitter of activity at synapses in autonomic ganglia, and from motor nerve to voluntary muscle.

The terms “cholinergic” and “adrenergic” have been introduced to describe nerve-fibres which transmit their actions by the release at their endings of acetylcholine, and of a substance related to adrenaline, respectively. It is shown that Langley and Anderson's evidence, long available, as to the kinds of peripheral efferent fibres which can replace one another in regeneration, can be summarized by the statement, that cholinergic can replace cholinergic fibres, and that adrenergic can replace adrenergic fibres; but that fibres of different chemical function cannot replace one another. The bearing of this new evidence on conceptions of the mode of action of “neuromimetic” drugs is discussed. The pharmacological problem can now be more clearly defined, and Dixon's participation in further attempts at its solution will be sadly missed.

Full text

PDF
319

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson H. K. The paralysis of involuntary muscle: Part III. On the action of pilocarpine, physostigmine, and atropine upon the paralysed iris. J Physiol. 1905 Dec 30;33(4-5):414–438. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1905.sp001129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brodie T. G., Dixon W. E. Contributions to the physiology of the lungs: Part II. On the innervation of the pulmonary blood vessels; and some observations on the action of suprarenal extract. J Physiol. 1904 Feb 25;30(5-6):476–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1904.sp001010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burn J. H., Tainter M. L. An analysis of the effect of cocaine on the actions of adrenaline and tyramine. J Physiol. 1931 Feb 25;71(2):169–193. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1931.sp002724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dale H. H., Feldberg W. The chemical transmission of secretory impulses to the sweat glands of the cat. J Physiol. 1934 Aug 24;82(1):121–128. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1934.sp003166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dale H. H., Gaddum J. H. Reactions of denervated voluntary muscle, and their bearing on the mode of action of parasympathetic and related nerves. J Physiol. 1930 Sep 18;70(2):109–144. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1930.sp002682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dikshit B. B. Action of acetylcholine on the brain and its occurrence therein. J Physiol. 1934 Feb 28;80(4):409–421. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1934.sp003101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elliott T. R. The action of adrenalin. J Physiol. 1905 Jul 13;32(5-6):401–467. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1905.sp001093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldberg W., Gaddum J. H. The chemical transmitter at synapses in a sympathetic ganglion. J Physiol. 1934 Jun 9;81(3):305–319. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1934.sp003137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Langley J. N., Anderson H. K. On autogenetic regeneration in the nerves of the limbs. J Physiol. 1904 Aug 22;31(5):418–428. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1904.sp001045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Langley J. N. On the Union of Cranial Autonomic (Visceral) Fibres with the Nerve Cells of the Superior Cervical Ganglion. J Physiol. 1898 Jul 26;23(3):240–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1898.sp000726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press

RESOURCES