Skip to main content
NCBI home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1991 May 1;144(9):1129–1132.

Prenatal diagnosis: the medical genetics perspective. Ethics and Public Policy Committee, Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.

PMCID: PMC1335320  PMID: 2018964

Full text

PDF
1129

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beck M. N. Eugenic abortion: an ethical critique. CMAJ. 1990 Aug 1;143(3):181–186. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benacerraf B. R., Frigoletto F. D. Amniocentesis under continuous ultrasound guidance: a series of 232 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Dec;62(6):760–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blumberg B. D., Golbus M. S., Hanson K. H. The psychological sequelae of abortion performed for a genetic indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Aug 1;122(7):799–808. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90718-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carpenter R. J., Jr, Hinkley C. M., Carpenter A. F. Midtrimester genetic amniocentesis. Use of ultrasound direction vs. blind needle insertion. J Reprod Med. 1983 Jan;28(1):35–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark S. L., DeVore G. R. Prenatal diagnosis for couples who would not consider abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jun;73(6):1035–1037. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198906000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Defoort P., Thiery M. Amniocentesis with the use of continuous real-time echography: experience with two hundred consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Dec 15;147(8):973–974. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90260-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donnai P., Charles N., Harris R. Attitudes of patients after "genetic" termination of pregnancy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Feb 21;282(6264):621–622. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6264.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Evers-Kiebooms G., Denayer L., Van den Berghe H. A child with cystic fibrosis: II. Subsequent family planning decisions, reproduction and use of prenatal diagnosis. Clin Genet. 1990 Mar;37(3):207–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1990.tb03504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Faden R. R., Chwalow A. J., Quaid K., Chase G. A., Lopes C., Leonard C. O., Holtzman N. A. Prenatal screening and pregnant women's attitudes toward the abortion of defective fetuses. Am J Public Health. 1987 Mar;77(3):288–290. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.3.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fava G. A., Kellner R., Michelacci L., Trombini G., Pathak D., Orlandi C., Bovicelli L. Psychological reactions to amniocentesis: a controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jul 1;143(5):509–513. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90538-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fava G. A., Trombini G., Michelacci L., Linder J. R., Pathak D., Bovicelli L. Hostility in women before and after amniocentesis. J Reprod Med. 1983 Jan;28(1):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Finley S. C., Varner P. D., Vinson P. C., Finley W. H. Participants' reaction to amniocentesis and prenatal genetic studies. JAMA. 1977 Nov 28;238(22):2377–2379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Galjaard H. European experience with prenatal diagnosis of congenital disease: a survey of 6121 cases. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1976;16(6):453–467. doi: 10.1159/000130663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Golbus M. S., Loughman W. D., Epstein C. J., Halbasch G., Stephens J. D., Hall B. D. Prenatal genetic diagnosis in 3000 amniocenteses. N Engl J Med. 1979 Jan 25;300(4):157–163. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197901253000402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Michelacci L., Fava G. A., Trombini G., Zielezny M., Bovicelli L., Orlandi C. Psychological distress and amniocentesis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1984;18(1):40–44. doi: 10.1159/000299046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nolan G. H., Schmickel R. D., Chantaratherakitti P., Knickerbocker C., Hamman J., Louwsma G. The effect of ultrasonography on midtrimester genetic amniocentesis complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jul 1;140(5):531–534. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90229-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. O'Brien W. F. Midtrimester genetic amniocentesis. A review of the fetal risks. J Reprod Med. 1984 Jan;29(1):59–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Reading A. E., Platt L. D. Impact of fetal testing on maternal anxiety. J Reprod Med. 1985 Dec;30(12):907–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Simpson N. E., Dallaire L., Miller J. R., Siminovich L., Hamerton J. L., Miller J., McKeen C. Prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease in Canada: report of a collaborative study. Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Oct 23;115(8):739–748. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tabor A., Philip J., Madsen M., Bang J., Obel E. B., Nørgaard-Pedersen B. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet. 1986 Jun 7;1(8493):1287–1293. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91218-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Villeneuve C., Laroche C., Lippman A., Marrache M. Psychological aspects of ultrasound imaging during pregnancy. Can J Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;33(6):530–536. doi: 10.1177/070674378803300616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Williamson R. A., Varner M. W., Grant S. S. Reduction in amniocentesis risks using a real-time needle guide procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 May;65(5):751–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES