Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2010 Mar 31;184(9):5308–5314. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000009

TLR4 Is a Negative Regulator in Noninfectious Lung Inflammation

Hang Zhao *,, Shaw-Wei Leu *,†,, Liyun Shi *,†,§, Rejmon Dedaj *,, Gaofeng Zhao *,, Hari G Garg *,, Lianjun Shen , Egil Lien , Katherine A Fitzgerald , Aviva Shiedlin #, Huahao Shen **, Deborah A Quinn *,, Charles A Hales *,
PMCID: PMC10733842  NIHMSID: NIHMS1943412  PMID: 20357263

Abstract

Low m.w. hyaluronan (LMW HA) has been shown to elicit the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in various cells in vitro. However, the effects of this molecule in vivo are unknown. In this study, we report that intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa) causes inflammation in mouse lung. A lack of TLR4 is associated with even stronger inflammatory response in the lung as shown by increased neutrophil counts and elevated cytokine and chemokine concentrations. We also demonstrate that TLR4 anti-inflammatory signaling is dependent upon a MyD88-independent pathway. TLR4-mediated IL-1R antagonist production plays a negative regulatory role in LMW HA (200 kDa) induced lung inflammation. These data provide a molecular level explanation for the function of TLR4 in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung inflammation, as inhibition of the β form of pro–IL-1 promotes an anti-inflammatory response.


The innate immune response is commonly mediated through activation of members of the Toll/IL-1R (TIR) superfamily. TLRs respond to different microbial products and endogenous agonists, and the signaling pathways activated are very similar to those generated by the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1. IL-1R and TLRs are highly homologous in their cytosolic portions, possessing a common intracellular TIR domain involved in the initiation of signaling (1).

TLR4 plays a key role in the recognition of Gram-negative bacterial components (LPS). TLR4 responds not only to exogenous canonical ligand (LPS), but also to other endogenous agonists generated by injured cells and tissues (2), including oligosaccharide hyaluronan (3, 4). Endogenous danger signals initiate an immune response in the absence of infection. LPS activates two distinct intracellular signaling pathways via TLR4. The two signaling pathways involve different combinations of adaptor proteins. The TLR4-MyD88–dependent pathway involves adaptor proteins MyD88 and MyD88 adaptor-like/TIR domain-containing adaptor protein. TLR4 also signals via the TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-β–related adaptor molecule (TRAM) and TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-β (TRIF) adaptor proteins. TRAM and TRIF are critical for production of type 1 IFN through IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) activation as well as late activation of NF-κB (5). However, the TRAM–TRIF pathway can be selectively activated depending on the nature of the ligands. The envelope glycoprotein G of the vesicular stomatitis virus has been shown to triggera third signaling pathway downstream from TLR4 (6). The third pathway does not activate NF-κB. It is fully dependent upon the adapter TRAM, only partially dependent upon TRIF, and independent of MyD88 adaptor-like and MyD88, leading to type 1 IFN (IFN-α/β) production (6).

IL-1 is a central proinflammatory cytokine among the cytokines/chemokines involved in acute and chronic inflammation (7). IL-1 is known to elicit multiple biologic effects. IL-1 can increase gene expression for CSFs and can increase the expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on endothelial cells, resulting in neutrophil accumulation in the airways (7). Injection of IL-1 into rodent tracheas results in neutrophil infiltration as well as acute alveolar leakage (8). IL-1 plays a predominant role in bleomycin-induced lung acute inflammation and chronic fibrosis. Bleomycin-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in mice requires the β form of pro–IL-1 (IL-1β) and IL-1R signaling through MyD88. IL-1β induced by bleomycin can upregulate the production of TNF-α, IL-6, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (9). IL-1β production and IL-1R activation are important in another noninfectious uric acid-triggered pulmonary inflammation (10). IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) is a specific receptor antagonist in the IL-1 family. IL-1RA is structurally related to IL-1 but specifically blocks the binding of IL-1 to cell-surface receptors without itself activating target cells (7).

High m.w. hyaluronan (HA) is an important component of the lung interstitium and functions to maintain lung structural integrity. High m.w. HA is broken down into low m.w. (LMW) HA fragments upon tissue injury (11). The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) contains a high percentage of LMW HA, whereas only high m.w. HA is found in BALF of non-ARDS patients and normal controls (12, 13). LMW HAs act as an endogenous danger signal to activate innate inflammatory responses via various signaling pathways (3, 4, 12, 14, 15), but the effects of TLR4 in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung injury in vivo are unclear. We now report that TLR4 negatively regulates LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung inflammation.

Materials and Methods

Mice and model

C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ, and C3H/HeOuJ mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). TLR4−/− (16), MyD88−/− (17), IRF3−/− (18), and TRAM−/−–TRIF−/− mice were generated by crossing TRIF−/− (19) with TRAM−/− (20). Routinely, mice 6–8 wk of age were used for experiments. All mice used in this report were housed in a pathogen-free rodent barrier facility. All animal experiments were approved in advance by the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Comparative Medicine (Boston, MA). LMW HA (200 kDa, 65 mg/kg) was delivered directly to the tracheas with a microsprayer (Penn-Century, Wyndmoor, PA). A total of 300 μg/mouse IL-1RA (anakinra, Amgen, Chesterbrook, PA) or TNF inhibitor (etanercept, Amgen) was injected s.c. 30 min before intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa).

LMW HA digestion

LMW HA (200 kDa, 32 mg/ml) were digested with hyaluronidase (from bovine testes, 3200 U/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 37°C overnight, pronase (from Streptomyces griseus, 320 U/ml; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) at 55°C for 1 h, DNase I (from bovine pancreas, 100 mg/ml; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) at 37°C for 1 h, and all samples were then boiled for 10 min. The samples were brought to neutral pH before treating mice. The treated LMW HA (65 mg/kg) was delivered directly to the tracheas with a microsprayer.

Pep-1 and control peptide

HA-blocking peptide Pep-1 (GAHWQFNALTVR) and scrambled control peptide (WRHGFALTAVNQ) were synthesized by AnaSpec (Fremont, CA) (21). The peptides were i.p. administered at a dose of 1 mg/mouse 2 h before LMW HA (200 kDa) treatment.

BALF

The trachea was exposed through a midline incision and cannulated with a sterile 22-gauge needle. BALF was obtained by instilling and collecting four 0.5-ml volumes of cold PBS through the incised trachea. A total of 1.8 ml lavage fluid was retrieved per mouse. Each BALF sample was centrifuged, and the supernatants were stored at −80°C until use. Total cell numbers in BALF were counted from each sample in a hemocytometer. BALF neutrophil counts were determined on cytospin preparations stained with a Diff-Quick staining kit (IMEB, San Marcos, CA).

ELISA

IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-6, TNF-α, MIP-2, and keratinocyte cell-derived chemokine (KC) in BALF were determined using mouse ELISA assay kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Albumin and IgM levels in BALF were measured using a mouse albumin ELISA kit (ALPCO, Salem, NH) and a mouse IgM ELISA kit (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX), respectively.

Isolation of BALF neutrophils and culture

BALFs were harvested 24 h after the intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa). BALF neutrophils were prepared using the neutrophil isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin was used for cell culture. Neutrophils were plated in 96-well plates at 1 × 105 cells/well in 100 μl medium. Cells were cultured in the medium alone or stimulated with LMW HA (100 μg/ml) for 12 h, and the cytokine produced in the supernatants was determined by ELISA.

Myeloperoxidase assay

After BALFs were performed, whole-lung homogenates were measured by a mouse myeloperoxidase (MPO) ELISA kit (Cell Sciences, Canton, MA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Lung injury score

Severity of lung inflammation was semiquantitatively assessed according to methods previously described (22). Quantal assessment of injury was performed in blinded fashion by grading four histological findings: alveolar septae, alveolar hemorrhage, intra-alveolar fibrin, and intra-alveolar infiltrates. Lungs were fixed overnight in 10% buffered formalin. The fixed lung sections were dehydrated, cleared, and embedded in paraffin by conventional H&E staining. A minimum of five fields were examined for each section.

Statistics

All data are given as means ± SEM. Data for all experiments were analyzed by unpaired Student t test (two groups) or ANOVA (>2 groups) using the Statview 6.0 software program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Comparisons between groups and tests of interactions were made assuming a two-factor analysis, with the interaction term testing each main effect and with the residual error testing the interaction. All comparisons were made using Fisher’s least significant difference procedure, so that multiple comparisons were made at the 0.05 level only if the overall F test from the ANOVA was significant at p < 0.05.

Results

TLR4-deficient mice develop severe lung injury

To investigate the role of TLR4 in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung injury in vivo, we administered highly pure LMW HA (200 kDa, 65 mg/kg) into the tracheas of TLR4−/− and wild-type (WT) (C57BL/6J) mice (Fig. 1A). Surprisingly, we found that deletion of TLR4 did not ameliorate the course of lung inflammation, but resulted in severe lung inflammation and injury. Twenty-four hours after LMW HA (200 kDa) administration, TLR4−/− mice demonstrated decreased spontaneous movement and an increase in huddling and ruffled fur. In contrast, WT mice were healthy in appearance. Pathological observation revealed that the lungs had a hemorrhagic appearance (Fig. 1B). Histological examination of the lungs from LMW HA (200 kDa)-treated TLR4−/− mice revealed severe inflammatory infiltrates in pulmonary alveoli (Fig. 1C), neutrophilis, and RBCs in the BALF (Fig. 1D). Quantal scoring of the severity of histological lung injury showed that the lung injury score was significantly higher in TLR4−/− mice than in WT mice (Fig. 1E).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

TLR4 deficiency is associated with exacerbated LMW HA-induced lung injury. A, The elution profile of a LMW HA (200 kDa), prepared by gamma-irradiation of bacterially fermented HA, using SEC/TriSEC 302 detectors. The eluted peaks were Gaussian and did not exhibit tailing, shoulders, or extraneous peaks (red, refractive index; green, right-angle light scattering; black, low-angle light scattering; blue, differential pressure viscometer). B, Twenty-four hours after intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa, 65 mg/kg), pathological observation of the lung. C, Lung sections were stained with H&E, original magnification ×200. D, Diff-Quick–stained cytospins of bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophils, original magnification ×400. The BALF dilution in TLR4−/− plus LMW HA of D was 1/4. Arrows indicate RBCs. E, Lung injury score. F, Total cell and neutrophil counts were performed on BALF. G, After BALF was performed, the MPO of whole lung homogenates was measured. H, BALF neutrophil influx in two strains of TLR4-deficient/mutant mice (C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ) and respective controls (C57BL/6J, C3H/HeOuJ). After 1, 3, and 7 d following LMW HA, neutrophils in BALFs were quantified (I), and MPO in lung tissues was analyzed (J). BD, Representative data from multiple mice (n = 4–6 per group) are shown. Data represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 4 mice per group). *p < 0.05.

Neutrophil counts in BALF were significantly increased 24 h after LMW HA (200 kDa) administration (Fig. 1F). Next, we examined whether the number of interstitial neutrophils were increased. Neutrophil infiltration into the lung tissue is quantified by measuring MPO activity. TLR4−/− mice had a significant increase in MPO activity compared with WT (Fig. 1G). Taken together, these data demonstrate a dramatic infiltration of neutrophils into the interstitial and intra-alveolar compartment in the lungs of TLR4−/− mice after LMW HA (200 kDa).

Data reported thus far were generated in studies conducted with C57BL/6J background (TLR4-deficient) mice. To determine whether the observed inflammation is strain dependent, additional studies were performed using TLR4−/− mutant (C3H/HeJ) mice and their respective control (C3H/HeOuJ) (23). We found that neutrophil counts in BALFs did not differ between the two strains of TLR4-deficient/mutant mice (Fig. 1H), indicating that mouse strain does not influence the observed phenotypes. Next, we evaluated neutrophil kinetics during inflammation induced by LMW HA administration. We found that a single intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung injury is a model of acute pulmonary inflammation in mice (Fig. 1I, IJ).

These effects could not be attributed to any trace amounts of endotoxin coadministered with the LMW HA (200 kDa), as TLR4−/− mice are resistant to endotoxin (23). To further define LMW HA (200 kDa) as the only source to induce lung inflammation, we administrated LMW HA (200 kDa) to TLR4−/− mice following administration of HA-blocking peptide Pep-1 or scrambled peptide (21). Examination of BALFs showed Pep-1– but not scrambled peptide-blocked inflammatory cell recruitment to the lungs of TLR4−/− mice (Fig. 2). We also performed experiments to rule out the potential effects of contaminating protein or DNA on the LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung inflammation. The induction of neutrophils in TLR4−/− mice was abolished when LMW HA was digested with hyaluronidase (HAase), but unaffected by pronase, DNase I (DNAse) or boiling treatment (Fig. 2). Our data indicate that LMW HA (200 kDa) is the only source to drive the lung inflammatory response.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

LMW HA (200 kDa) is the only source to drive the lung inflammation in 24 h after LMW HA. LMW HA alone or postdigestion with hyaluronidase (HAase), pronase or DNase I (DNAse) were administered into the tracheas of TLR4−/− mice. BALF neutrophils were measured. Blockade of LMW HA (200 kDa) by Pep-1 or hyaluronidase (HAase) ameliorated lung injury in TLR4−/− mice. Data represent mean ± SEM from two independent experiments (n = 4 mice per group). *p < 0.05.

TLR4 deficiency results in increased proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine responses and pulmonary vascular leakage

Enhanced LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung injury in TLR4−/− mice correlated with a marked increased in BALF proinflammatory IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 at 24 h postadministration (Fig. 3AC). Neutrophil chemoattractants, including MIP-2 and KC, also increased (Fig. 3D, 3E).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

TLR4 deficiency is associated with increased cytokine/chemokine responses and hyperpermeability in the lung 24 h after intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa, 65 mg/kg). A, IL-1β. B, TNF-α. C, IL-6. D, MIP-2. E, KC. Albumin (F) and IgM (G) were upregulated in the BALF of TLR4−/− mice. Data represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 4 mice per group). *p < 0.05.

Lung hyperpermeability is also involved in the pathogenesis of lung inflammation (24). We examined the effect of LMW HA (200 kDa) on lung permeability in TLR4−/− mice. The concentrations of albumin and IgM in BALFs are assayed to evaluate the integrity of the alveolar capillary membrane barrier and to assess pulmonary vascular leakage. These parameters were markedly increased in TLR4−/− BALFs 24 h after LMW HA (200 kDa) compared with WT mice (Fig. 3F, 3G), indicating that LMW HA (200 kDa) also injures pulmonary endothelial and epithelial cell layers.

TLR4 limits pulmonary inflammation through the MyD88-independent pathway

TLR4 signaling can be segregated into two distinct pathways: one leading to activation of the MyD88-dependent arm and the other leading to the MyD88-independent (TRAM/TRIF-mediated) arm (25). Both of these cascades lead to distinct outcomes: the former giving rise to expression of proinflammatory genes, such as TNF-α and IL-1 (26), whereas the latter gives rise to IRF3-mediated expression of type 1 IFNs (19, 25). To characterize TLR4 intracellular signaling pathways involved in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced inflammation, we respectively administrated LMW HA (200 kDa) to TLR4−/−, MyD88−/−, TRAM–TRIF double−/−, and IRF3−/− mice. Histological examination of the lungs from LMW HA-treated TLR4−/−, TRAM–TRIF double−/−, and IRF3−/− mice revealed obvious severe inflammatory infiltrates in the alveolar space within 24 h after LMW HA (200 kDa) administration. In contrast, MyD88−/− mice did not show a significant change in neutrophil accumulation (Fig. 4AC). Furthermore, TLR4−/−, TRAM–TRIF double−/−, and IRF3−/− mice all showed higher levels of IL-1β and lower levels of IL-1RA compared with WT mice (Fig. 4D, 4E). Thus, our data suggest that the protective role of TLR4 is dependent on TRAM/TRIF and IRF3 in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced inflammation.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

MyD88-independent pathway plays a protective role in LMW HA-induced lung injury 24 h after intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa, 65 mg/kg). A, Increased neutrophil infiltration and bleeding in TLR4−/−, TRAM–TRIF double−/−, and IRF3−/− but not MyD88−/− and TRIF−/− mice (H&E, original magnification ×400). Representative results of multiple mice (n = 5–8 per group) are shown. Lung injury scores (B), BALF neutrophils (C), IL-1β (D), and IL-1RA (E) in WT, TLR4−/−, MyD88−/−, TRAM–TRIF double−/−, and IRF3−/− mice. All mice were on the C57BL/6J background. Data represent mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (n = 4 mice per group). *p < 0.05.

Lack of TLR4 shifts IL-1RA/IL-1β ratio toward a proinflammatory phenotype

IL-1 has been implicated as a central mediator of tissue damage and destruction in a number of diseases (7). To determine whether enhanced pulmonary inflammation in TLR4−/− mice was due to elevated IL-1β, we blocked IL-1β in vivo. TLR4−/− mice were treated with rIL-1RA (anakinra, Amgen) to block IL-1R activation. Pretreatment with IL-1RA protected TLR4−/− mice against LWM HA (200 kDa)-induced neutrophil infiltration (Fig. 5A) and decreased BALF IL-1β, MIP-2, KC, TNF-α, or IL-6 levels (Fig. 5BF). In comparison, inhibition of TNF-α signaling through pretreatment with TNF-α inhibitor (etanercept, Amgen) was not efficient in reducing neutrophil infiltration and IL-1β, MIP-2, or KC levels in TLR4−/− mice (Fig. 5AD), indicating that IL-1β but not TNF-α is the central inflammatory mediator in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced inflammation. These results suggest that initial signaling by IL-1β may be responsible for secretion of other cytokines.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Increased LMW HA-induced inflammatory responses are associated with the imbalance between IL-1b and IL-1RA in TLR4−/− mice. A, Neutrophils. B, IL-1β. C, MIP-2. D, KC. TNF-α (E) and IL-6 (F) BALF levels were analyzed 24 h after intratracheal administration of LMW HA in the presence of IL-1RA (AF) or TNF-α inhibitor (AD). The amount of IL-1RA in BALFs (G) and IL-1RA/IL-1β ratio (H) were decreased in TLR4−/− mice 24 h after LMW HA. BALF neutrophils that had been isolated from mice for 24 h after intratracheal administration of LMW HA were restimulated with LMW HA in vitro for 12 h. Then the production of IL-1RA (I) and IL-1β (J) was measured. K, IL-1RA/IL-1β ratio in neutrophils. Data represent one of three independent experiments with similar results (n = 4 mice per group). *p < 0.05.

The imbalance between IL-1β and IL-1RA is of pathophysiological importance in various acute and chronic peripheral diseases (7). High IL-1RA concentrations and increased IL-1RA/IL-1β ratio are correlated with a more rapid resolution of attacks of arthritis in lyme disease (27). To determine whether this is also the case in our setting, BALFs of IL-1RA were measured by ELISA. Levels of IL-1RA and IL-1RA/IL-1β ratio from TLR4−/− mice were significantly decreased compared with WT (Fig. 5G, 5H). Because LMW HA only increased the number of neutrophils in BALFs (Fig. 1F), we investigated the impact of LMW HA on the production of IL-1RA and IL-1β by neutrophils. Neutrophils were isolated from the BALFs 24 h after LMW HA (200 kDa) administration and cultured in medium alone or stimulated with LMW HA (200 kDa). After 12 h, culture supernatants were assayed for IL-1RA and IL-1β concentrations by ELISA. Compared to WT (Fig. 5IK), the experiments demonstrate decreased LMW HA-stimulated IL-1RA release and decreased IL-1RA/IL-1β ratio in TLR4-deficient neutrophils. Our results indicate that the TLR4 gene can modulate the balance of the IL-1RA/IL-1b system. TLR4 deficiency shifts the LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced IL-1RA/IL-1b ratio toward a proinflammatory phenotype.

Discussion

HA fragments are found in mouse BALFs in the bleomycin model of lung injury (28). So far, intratracheal administration of bleomycin is the best indirect model to study the role of LMW HA in vivo. However, bleomycin-induced signaling is controversial. Couillin’s group (9) shows that bleomycin signaling requires IL-1R, not TLR2 or TLR4, by nasal bleomycin instillation; however, these results disagree with the findings by Noble’s group (12), which show that bleomycin requires the TLR2 and TLR4 pathways by intratracheal bleomycin administration. The existence of multiple sizes of HAwith a peak molecular size of 540 kDa (29), as induced by bleomycin, may have contributed to difficulties in determining what defines HA as active or inactive. LMW HAs are likely to use different signaling pathways to induce the release or expression of inflammatory mediators. For example, LMW HA at a wide range of molecular sizes with a peak molecular size of ∼200 kDa activates the macrophage immune response via TLR2, not TLR4 (14). Oligosaccharide HA (4–16 kDa) induces dendritic cell activation and stimulates endothelial recognition of injury via TLR4 (3, 4). Soluble HA (LMW HA at an unknown range of sizes) induces the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in TLR4 mutant (C3H/HeJ) bone marrow-derived macrophages (15). However, LMW HA (135 kDa) does not induce the expression of TNF-α in TLR2-TLR4 double-deficient peritoneal macrophages (12). The mechanisms behind how LMW HAs mediate distinct signals are a central unresolved issue. It is possible that HA size plays an important role in cell signaling.

The three major consequences of intratracheal LMW HA (200 kDa) administration are airway neutrophilia, production of proinflammatory mediators, and airway epithelial cell damage. However, a lack of TLR4 is associated with a stronger neutrophil recruitment in BALFs, leading to excessive lung inflammation and hyperpermeability. Lung inflammatory responses are significantly inhibited when TLR4−/− mice are treated with IL-1RA before intratracheal administration of LMW HA (200 kDa), which is associated with a reduction in MIP-2, KC, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels (Fig. 5). All four of these proteins have been linked to neutrophil accumulation (30). Administration of IL-1RA also prevents the marked epithelial cell damage seen following LMW HA (200 kDa) (S. Leu and H. Zhao, unpublished observation). Thus, IL-1β induced by LMW HA (200 kDa) is a central mediator in the production of a variety of inflammatory mediators and neutrophil accumulation in mouse lung. The inflammation induced by LMW HA (200 kDa) administration is not dependent on TNF-α signaling because pulmonary inflammation was not ameliorated by treatment with TNF-α inhibitor (Fig. 5). Our findings are consistent with the data obtained in vitro: soluble HA (LMW HA) stimulates human peripheral monocytes and rabbit peritoneal macrophages to release IL-1 (31). MyD88 is a major mediator of IL-1 signal transduction downstream of IL-1R (17). LMW HA (200 kDa) may induce pulmonary inflammation via MyD88.

IL-1 is involved in host defense against exogenous pathogens or endogenous danger signals, functioning as a primary sensor of exogenous orendogenous ligands and activating signaling pathways that stimulate immunological and inflammatory cells to synthesize cytokine mediators, which subsequently create inflammatory responses (7). However, this inflammatory response must be dampened to limit excessive injury, as its dysregulation can significantly worsen inflammation. Excess IL-1 has also been implicated in the pathophysiology of a variety of inflammatory and immune lung diseases, including asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, and granuloma formation (32). Thus, IL-1 signals must be tightly regulated to avoid detrimental and inappropriate inflammatory responses. The inflammatory response is a highly regulated process in which the balance between proinflammation and anti-inflammation is orchestrated to ultimately drive and resolve inflammation. We have found that TLR4 is one of these inhibiting components in LMW HA-induced lung inflammation. TLR4 plays an immunosuppressive role through the induction of the anti-inflammatory mediator IL-1RA. IL-1RA acts as a negative regulator of the IL-1β signal. Administration of IL-1RA into TLR4−/− mice can inhibit the production of neutrophil chemo-attractants and neutrophil accumulation in the lung, indicating that lung destruction in TLR4−/− mice is due to a local imbalance between IL-1β and IL-1RA. The present investigation suggests that treatment with IL-1RA may afford significant protection against LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung inflammation.

Our data indicate that TLR4 signaling plays an anti-inflammatory role in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced acute lung inflammation. Although the lack of TLR4 leads to excessive lung inflammation in our model, inflammation is eventually cleared in TLR4−/− mice, indicating that other pathways are also involved in the anti-inflammatory response. CD44 is another important anti-inflammatory gene in noninfectious bleomycin-induced lung injury (29). Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the physical association of TLR4 and CD44 (33). These data suggest that TLR4-CD44 works together as a brake in LMW HA (200 kDa)-induced lung inflammation in vivo. Thus, additional work is needed to understand whether CD44 can regulate TLR4 activation in our model.

The inhalation of a TLR4 agonist (LPS) results in pulmonary inflammation and injury in humans (34). Therefore, intervention of TLR4-mediated inflammation may be a potential approach to treat and prevent lung injury and a variety of associated diseases. Two TLR4 antagonists, E5564 and TAK-242, have progressed into clinical phase III studies for the treatment of Gram-negative sepsis (35). Infectious etiologies, including sepsis and pneumonia, are leading causes of acute lung injury/ARDS (36). However, our data have demonstrated that HA degradation products result in severe lung injury in the absence of the TLR4 signaling. Because BALFs of patients with ARDS contain a high percentage of LMW forms of HA (12, 13), our data suggest that caution should be exercised in using TLR4 antagonists during acute lung injury/ARDS HA breakdown.

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Akira, Department of Host Defense, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, for mice.

This work was supported by HL007874, HL039150, an unrestricted grant from the Genzyme Corporation, and the Susannah Wood Fund.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

ARDS

acute respiratory distress syndrome

BALF

bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

HA

hyaluronan

IRF3

IFN regulatory factor 3

IL-1β

β form of pro–IL-1

IL-1RA

IL-1 receptor antagonist

KC

keratinocyte cell-derived chemokine

LMW HA

low m.w. hyaluronan

MPO

myeloperoxidase

TIR

Toll/IL-1R

TRAM

Toll/IL-1R domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-β–related adaptor molecule

TRIF

Toll/IL-1R domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN-b

WT

wild-type

Footnotes

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.O’Neill LA 2008. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: 10 years of progress. Immunol. Rev. 226: 10–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miyake K 2007. Innate immune sensing of pathogens and danger signals by cell surface Toll-like receptors. Semin. Immunol. 19: 3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Termeer C, Benedix F, Sleeman J, Fieber C, Voith U, Ahrens T, Miyake K, Freudenberg M, Galanos C, and Simon JC. 2002. Oligosaccharides of Hyaluronan activate dendritic cells via toll-like receptor 4. J. Exp. Med. 195: 99–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor KR, Trowbridge JM, Rudisill JA, Termeer CC, Simon JC, and Gallo RL. 2004. Hyaluronan fragments stimulate endothelial recognition of injury through TLR4. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 17079–17084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Akira S, Uematsu S, and Takeuchi O. 2006. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124: 783–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Georgel P, Jiang Z, Kunz S, Janssen E, Mols J, Hoebe K, Bahram S, Oldstone MB, and Beutler B. 2007. Vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G activates a specific antiviral Toll-like receptor 4-dependent pathway. Virology 362: 304–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dinarello CA 1996. Biologic basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood 87: 2095–2147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee YM, Hybertson BM, Cho HG, Terada LS, Cho O, Repine AJ, and Repine JE. 2000. Platelet-activating factor contributes to acute lung leak in rats given interleukin-1 intratracheally. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 279: L75–L80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gasse P, Mary C, Guenon I, Noulin N, Charron S, Schnyder-Candrian S, Schnyder B, Akira S, Quesniaux VF, Lagente V, et al. 2007. IL-1R1/MyD88 signaling and the inflammasome are essential in pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 117: 3786–3799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gasse P, Riteau N, Charron S, Girre S, Fick L, Petrilli V´, Tschopp J, Lagente V, Quesniaux VF, Ryffel B, and Couillin I. 2009. Uric acid is a danger signal activating NALP3 inflammasome in lung injury inflammation and fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 179: 903–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fraser JR, Laurent TC, and Laurent UB. 1997. Hyaluronan: its nature, distribution, functions and turnover. J. Intern. Med. 242: 27–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang D, Liang J, Fan J, Yu S, Chen S, Luo Y, Prestwich GD, Mascarenhas MM, Garg HG, Quinn DA, et al. 2005. Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan. Nat. Med. 11: 1173–1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.llgren R., Samuelsson T, Laurent TC, and Modig J. 1989. Accumulation of hyaluronan (hyaluronic acid) in the lung in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 139: 682–687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Scheibner KA, Lutz MA, Boodoo S, Fenton MJ, Powell JD, and Horton MR. 2006. Hyaluronan fragments act as an endogenous danger signal by engaging TLR2. J. Immunol. 177: 1272–1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Noble PW, Lake FR, Henson PM, and Riches DW. 1993. Hyaluronate activation of CD44 induces insulin-like growth factor-1 expression by a tumor necrosis factor-alpha-dependent mechanism in murine macrophages. J. Clin. Invest. 91: 2368–2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hoshino K, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Sanjo H, Ogawa T, Takeda Y, Takeda K, and Akira S. 1999. Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide: evidence for TLR4 as the Lps gene product. J. Immunol. 162: 3749–3752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adachi O, Kawai T, Takeda K, Matsumoto M, Tsutsui H, Sakagami M, Nakanishi K, and Akira S. 1998. Targeted disruption of the MyD88 gene results in loss of IL-1- and IL-18-mediated function. Immunity 9: 143–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sato M, Suemori H, Hata N, Asagiri M, Ogasawara K, Nakao K, Nakaya T, Katsuki M, Noguchi S, Tanaka N, and Taniguchi T. 2000. Distinct and essential roles of transcription factors IRF-3 and IRF-7 in response to viruses for IFN-alpha/beta gene induction. Immunity 13: 539–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, Sanjo H, Takeuchi O, Sugiyama M, Okabe M, Takeda K, and Akira S. 2003. Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science 301: 640–643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Uematsu S, Hoshino K, Kaisho T, Takeuchi O, Takeda K, and Akira S. 2003. TRAM is specifically involved in the Toll-like receptor 4-mediated MyD88-independent signaling pathway. Nat. Immunol. 4: 1144–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mummert ME, Mohamadzadeh M, Mummert DI, Mizumoto N, and Takashima A. 2000. Development of a peptide inhibitor of hyaluronan-mediated leukocyte trafficking. J. Exp. Med. 192: 769–779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matute-Bello G, Winn RK, Jonas M, Chi EY, Martin TR, and Liles WC. 2001. Fas (CD95) induces alveolar epithelial cell apoptosis in vivo: implications for acute pulmonary inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 158: 153–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Van Huffel C, Du X, Birdwell D, Alejos E, Silva M, Galanos C, et al. 1998. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science 282: 2085–2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, and Hudson LD. 2005. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 353: 1685–1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kawai T, and Akira S. 2005. Pathogen recognition with Toll-like receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 17: 338–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kawai T, Adachi O, Ogawa T, Takeda K, and Akira S. 1999. Unresponsiveness of MyD88-deficient mice to endotoxin. Immunity 11: 115–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Miller LC, Lynch EA, Isa S, Logan JW, Dinarello CA, and Steere AC. 1993. Balance of synovial fluid IL-1 beta and IL-1 receptor antagonist and recovery from Lyme arthritis. Lancet 341: 146–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nettelbladt O, Bergh J, Schenholm M, Tengblad A, and Ha R¨llgren. 1989. Accumulation of hyaluronic acid in the alveolar interstitial tissue in bleomycin-induced alveolitis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 139: 759–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Teder P, Vandivier RW, Jiang D, Liang J, Cohn L, Pure E´, Henson PM, and Noble PW. 2002. Resolution of lung inflammation by CD44. Science 296: 155–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nick JA, Young SK, Brown KK, Avdi NJ, Arndt PG, Suratt BT, Janes MS, Henson PM, and Worthen GS. 2000. Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in a murine model of pulmonary inflammation. J. Immunol. 164: 2151–2159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hiro D, Ito A, Matsuta K, and Mori Y. 1986. Hyaluronic acid is an endogenous inducer of interleukin-1 production by human monocytes and rabbit macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 140: 715–722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arend WP 2002. The balance between IL-1 and IL-1Ra in disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 13: 323–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Taylor KR, Yamasaki K, Radek KA, Di Nardo A, Goodarzi H, Golenbock D, Beutler B, and Gallo RL. 2007. Recognition of hyaluronan released in sterile injury involves a unique receptor complex dependent on Toll-like receptor 4, CD44, and MD-2. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 18265–18275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Thorn J 2001. The inflammatory response in humans after inhalation of bacterial endotoxin: a review. Inflamm. Res. 50: 254–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Leon CG, Tory R, Jia J, Sivak O, and Wasan KM. 2008. Discovery and development of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) antagonists: a new paradigm for treating sepsis and other diseases. Pharm. Res. 25: 1751–1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ware LB, and Matthay MA. 2000. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 342: 1334–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES