Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 31.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Rev Immunol. 2010;30(3):255–270. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v30.i3.30

New Technologies in Using Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Vectors

Roy Curtiss III 1,*, Wei Xin 1, Yuhua Li 1, Wei Kong 1, Soo-Young Wanda 1, Bronwyn Gunn 1, Shifeng Wang 1
PMCID: PMC3970581  NIHMSID: NIHMS564137  PMID: 20370633

Abstract

Recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccines (RASVs) have been constructed to deliver antigens from other pathogens to induce immunity to those pathogens in vaccinated hosts. The attenuation means should ensure that the vaccine survives following vaccination to colonize lymphoid tissues without causing disease symptoms. This necessitates that attenuation and synthesis of recombinant gene encoded protective antigens do not diminish the ability of orally administered vaccines to survive stresses encountered in the gastrointestinal tract. We have eliminated these problems by using RASVs with regulated delayed expression of attenuation and regulated delayed synthesis of recombinant antigens. These changes result in RASVs that colonize effector lymphoid tissues efficiently to serve as “factories” to synthesize protective antigens that induce higher protective immune responses than achieved when using previously constructed RASVs. We have devised a biological containment system with regulated delayed lysis to preclude RASV persistence in vivo and survival if excreted. Attributes were added to reduce the mild diarrhea sometimes experienced with oral live RASVs and to ensure complete safety in newborns. These collective technologies have been used to develop a novel, low-cost, RASV-synthesizing, multiple-protective Streptococcus pneumoniae antigens that will be safe for newborns/infants and will induce protective immunity to diverse S. pneumoniae serotypes after oral immunization.

Keywords: antigen synthesis, biological containment, delayed attenuation or attenuation, delayed, recombinant vaccines, Salmonella, vaccine

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1989, at this symposium held at Lake Louise in the Banff National Park of Canada, I reported1 on our success in developing a balanced-lethal vectorhost system for use with recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccines (RASVs). This system ensured the stability of plasmid vectors encoding protective antigens in vivo after immunization of animal hosts, and eliminated the use of drug-resistance markers, which were being discouraged for live vaccines.24 Much has transpired in these past 20 years,58 but a still frequently asked question is why use Salmonella as a vaccine vector for delivery of antigens to the immune system rather than more benign pathogens or commensals? The most critical issue is invasion and colonization of deep effector lymphoid tissues after mucosal delivery. In other words, getting to regional lymph nodes plus the spleen is of critical importance in inducing memory T cells in locations where they persist. Salmonella is the most proficient pathogen in accomplishing this at the lowest mucosally delivered immunizing dose, and initiates this deep invasion by first attaching to and invading various mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues of the gut, nasopharynx, bronchi, etc. This results in the induction of mucosal, systemic, and cellular immune responses with induction of long-term protective immunity. Orally administered attenuated pathogens that are not invasive, such as Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae, and rough mutants of Salmonella lacking lipopolysaccharide (LPS) components or that are only invasive to mucosal tissues (i.e., Shigella) seldom induce lasting immunity. In addition, Salmonella has exceptional adjuvant qualities and can even induce mucosal and systemic antibody titers in MyD88−/− (myeloid differentiation factor 88 deficient) and TRIF−/− (Toll-interacting receptor-domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon deficient) mice that are equal to or higher than those induced in wildtype mice.9,10 In addition, we know a great deal about the pathogenicity, physiology, and genomics of Salmonella enterica serotypes and can genetically manipulate these strains using all of the molecular genetic tools developed for the study of gram-negative enteric bacteria since the 1940s.

The use of live bacterial vaccines for oral delivery eliminates the need for needles, with their high cost and associated risks, but is associated with problems not fully appreciated during the early development of these technologies. Indeed, we all have endeavored to design and construct RASVs with maximal abilities to colonize internal effector lymphoid tissues to induce maximal protective mucosal, systemic, and cellular immunities against the pathogen of choice. However, the sojourn of a RASV from a liquid suspension at ambient temperature to entry into the mouth leads to a succession of stresses imposed by the changing environments of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The responses to some of these stresses, such as exposure to acid,11,12 bile,13,14 and defensins,15 have been well studied, whereas other stresses and combinations of stresses have not. Thus, even wild-type Salmonella strains need a reasonably high oral inoculum (105 to 106 colony-forming units [CFU]) to cause disease even though they are capable of turning on a succession of different genes to cope with this succession of different encountered stresses. This capability often does not exist, or only partially exists, in many Salmonella vaccine strains attenuated by defined deletion mutations inactivating global regulators or imposing nutrient deprivation that are much more susceptible to not surviving one or more stresses encountered in the GI tract. Our recognition of this16,17 led us to develop a means to genetically engineer vaccine strains to display a regulated delayed attenuation such that strains would have attributes of a wild-type strain at the time of oral inoculation and then, after colonization of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues and internal lymphoid tissues, would gradually lose virulence traits as a function of cell division and do so in a timely manner so as to not cause disease symptoms. Also, as has been recognized for some time,18 high-level expression of the protective protein antigens needed to induce maximal mucosal and serum antibody titers was often somewhat attenuating and reduced the ability of RASV strains to efficiently colonize lymphoid tissues.19 We have therefore developed a means of regulated delayed synthesis of recombinant protective antigens20 that also contributes to improved RASV colonization and immune responses.21

In this review, we discuss these improved means of enhancing the induction of protective immune responses by RASVs, and discuss other means to enhance vaccine safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Our focus has been on developing safe RASVs suitable for use in newborns/neonates and infants and, more specifically, to develop a vaccine to induce protective immunity to the diversity of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains encountered throughout the world that cause some two million annual deaths, mostly in children less than five years of age.22

II. MEANS FOR ACHIEVING REGULATED DELAYED ATTENUATION OF RASV STRAINS FOR MUCOSAL IMMUNIZATION

During the past seven years, our group has endeavored to develop a vastly improved array of means to enhance the safety, efficacy, and utility of Salmonella antigen-delivery technologies. Many well-known means for attenuation of Salmonella (Table 1, Part A) diminish its ability to withstand stresses encountered in the GI tract after oral immunization or impair its ability to attach to, invade into and survive in the gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues, collectively leading to diminished immunogenicity. Therefore, we have developed three classes of usable means to achieve regulated delayed attenuation in vivo such that the vaccine at the time of immunization exhibits almost the same abilities as a fully virulent wild-type strain to contend with stresses and successfully reach effector lymphoid tissues before display of attenuation to preclude onset of any disease symptoms.16

Table 1.

Mutations and Associated Phenotypes Used to Modify Salmonella Vaccine Strains

Genotype Phenotype
A. Deletion mutations used to achieve attenuation
  ΔaroA, ΔaroC, and ΔaroD Impose a nutritional requirement for aromatic amino acids and several essential vitamins such as p-aminobenzoic acid
  Δcya and Δcrp Eliminate synthesis of cyclic-AMP and the catabolite regulatory protein that are necessary for virulence
  ΔphoP and ΔphoQ A two-component regulatory system essential for virulence
  Δfur Iron uptake regulatory protein that regulates genes needed to maintain adequate but not excessive concentrations of iron
  ΔrpoS Sigma factor that regulates genes needed for stationary phase growth and to respond to many types of stress
B. Deletion and deletion-insertion mutations to confer a regulated delayed attenuation phenotype
  ΔgalE Encodes UDP-galactose epimerase needed to synthesize LPS core and O-antigen and thus necessary for virulence
  Δpmi Encodes phosphomannose isomerase needed for synthesis of GDP-mannose for LPS O-antigen and thus necessary for virulence
  ΔPcrp∷TT araC PBAD crp Makes synthesis of Crp dependent on presence of arabinose in growth medium and ceases to be synthesized in vivo due to the absence of arabinose; Crp decreases as a consequence of cell division in vivo to lead to attenuation
  ΔPphoPQ∷TT araC PBAD phoPQ Makes synthesis of PhoP and PhoQ dependent on the presence of arabinose in growth medium and ceases to be synthesized in vivo due to the absence of arabinose; PhoP and PhoQ decrease as a consequence of cell division in vivo to lead to attenuation
  ΔPfur∷TT araC PBAD fur Makes synthesis of Fur dependent on presence of arabinose in growth medium and ceases to be synthesized in vivo due to the absence of arabinose; Fur decreases as a consequence of cell division in vivo to lead to attenuation presumably due to an iron overload
  ΔPrpoS∷TT araC PBAD rpoS Makes synthesis of RpoS dependent on presence of arabinose in growth medium and ceases to be synthesized in vivo due to the absence of arabinose; RpoS decreases very rapidly in vivo to lead to attenuation
C. Deletion and deletion-insertion mutations to facilitate regulated delayed lysis in vivo
  ΔPmurA∷TT araC PBAD murA Makes synthesis of MurA, the first enzyme in the synthesis of muramic acid, dependent on presence of arabinose in growth medium and ceases to be synthesized in vivo due to the absence of arabinose; MurA decreases as a consequence of cell division in vivo to ultimately lead to cell lysis and death
  ΔasdA∷TT araC PBAD c2 The Asd enzyme is essential for the synthesis of diaminopimelic acid required for peptidoglycan synthesis; the arabinose-dependent synthesis of the C2 repressor is to enable a regulated delayed expression of DNA sequences under the control of a promoter repressed by C2; the ΔasdA mutation is complemented by an Asd+ plasmid vector
  Δ(gmd-fcl) Eliminates two enzymes needed to synthesize GDP-fucose that is required for colanic acid synthesis, which can protect cells undergoing cell wall-less death from lysing
D. Promoters and deletion-insertion mutations for regulated delayed in vivo synthesis
  PnirB A promoter expressed at high level under anaerobic conditions
  ΔrelA198araC PBAD lacI TT The relA mutation uncouples growth regulation from a dependence of protein synthesis, an important attribute in strains with regulated delayed lysis; the arabinose-dependent synthesis of the LacI repressor is to enable a regulated delayed expression of DNA sequences under the control of Ptrc
  Ptrc A promoter expressed at high level under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions and is repressible by the arabinose-dependent synthesis of the Lacl repressor
  Phage P22 PL and PR These promoters are repressible by the arabinose-dependent synthesis of the C2 repressor
  PpagC A promoter expressed in vivo after activation of PhoP
  PdmsA A promoter expressed at high level under anaerobic conditions
  PssaG A promoter activated in vivo by the Salmonella Pathogenicity Island-2 ssrB gene
  PsspA A promoter activated during starvation
E. Other contributing mutations
  ΔaraBAD Eliminates ability to use arabinose to prevent acid production during growth of strains in media with arabinose and extends delay in shut-off of arabinose-dependent gene expression for about one added cell division
  ΔaraE Enhances retention of arabinose after uptake
  ΔsopB Reduces fluid secretion to lessen the mild diarrhea and enhances immunogenicity

Δ, deletion; TT, transcription terminator; P, promoter

A. Reversible Synthesis of LPS O-Antigen and/or Parts of the LPS Core With Regulated Delayed Attenuation In Vivo Phenotype

Colonization of the intestinal tract by Salmonella following oral administration is dependent upon/facilitated by the expression of a number of surface antigens, including LPS O-antigen side chains, a diversity of fimbrial adhesins, flagella, and possibly certain outer membrane proteins, as well by the expression of a succession of gene products that enable survival against a succession of stresses (acid, bile, defensins, anaerobiosis, osmolarity shifts, ion excess, etc.) (Table 1, Part B). Thus, rough mutants that have mutational lesions precluding synthesis of LPS O-antigen or parts of the LPS core do not colonize the intestinal tract23,24 and are defective in attaching to and invading intestinal cells and surviving in cells on the other side of the intestinal wall barrier.25,26 This latter phenotype is undoubtedly due to the fact that LPS is needed for Salmonella to display resistance to killing by macrophages27,28 and serum29,30 and to multiply in blood. In accord with these observations, rough Salmonella mutants defective in LPS synthesis, and thus defective in infection, are among the most frequently isolated mutants using signature-tagged mutagenesis,31 and genes for LPS biosynthesis are often up-regulated during infection, as revealed using in vivo expression technology.32 For these reasons, rough mutants of Salmonella have not been effective when used as live oral vaccines.33,34 It follows that to be safe and efficacious, an attenuated, immunogenic live vaccine must not only display avirulence and not induce disease symptomology, but also be able to reach, multiply, and persist for a while in those lymphoid organs necessary to stimulate a protective immune response. Obviously, permanently rough Salmonella mutants cannot achieve the latter. As a potential way around this, the use of Salmonella strains with mutations in the galE locus encoding uridine diphosphate (UDP)-galactose epimerase, an enzyme that interconverts UDP-glucose and UDP-galactose,35 had previously been considered.

UDP-galactose is needed for the synthesis of both the LPS core and the O antigen in many Salmonella serotypes.36 When Salmonella galE mutants are provided low levels of galactose, they make normal LPS, but in an environment devoid of free (nonphosphorylated) galactose, they rapidly lose the ability to synthesize a complete LPS O-antigen and core.37 One of the difficulties with galE mutants is that they are sensitive to galactose38,39 and accumulate galactose-resistant mutants in their population, which are permanently rough and therefore not only avirulent but also nonimmunogenic. Also, because of the LPS core defect, these galE mutants, even when administered parenterally, are somewhat hyper-attenuated (in animals but not humans) and do not induce high-level protective immunity.40,41 Another alternative to generate a reversibly rough phenotype is to make use of pmi mutants that have a mutation in the gene for phosphomannose isomerase,42 which interconverts mannose 6-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate. Mannose 6-phosphate is then converted to GDP-mannose and used for the synthesis of O-antigen side chains.43 Fortunately, pmi mutants are not mannose sensitive and, as shown by Collins et al.,44 are partially attenuated. We have demonstrated that pmi mutants, when grown in media containing mannose, synthesize wild-type levels of LPS O-antigen side chains, are reasonably attenuated but highly immunogenic.16

We have extensively investigated Salmonella typhimurium strains with the Δpmi-2426 mutation (Δ = deletion mutation) to demonstrate its attenuation (not complete), high immunogenicity, efficacy in enhancing induction of high-antibody titers to cross-protective outer membrane proteins,16 and ability to enhance production of outer membrane vesicles that can also deliver recombinant protective antigens to enhance induction of protective immunity.45,46 These results, obtained with cultures grown in the presence of mannose, imply that the LPS O-antigen side chains persist long enough while the vaccine strain is in the intestinal tract to enable subsequent successful colonization of lymphoid tissues, and/or that sufficient concentrations of free mannose exist in the intestinal tract to sustain LPS O-antigen side chain synthesis. Our results, however, in accord with those of others,44 indicate that free mannose (nonphosphorylated) is not available in sufficient quantity in animal tissues to support a level of LPS O-antigen synthesis for display of a wild-type level of virulence. An additional consequence of the loss of O-antigen side chains by pmi mutants in vivo is the heightened induced antibody titers against the LPS core47,48 that is common to most S. enterica subspecies 1 serotypes49,50 (except S. arizonae51), as well as to exposed outer membrane proteins. It is also possible to combine the ΔgalE and Δpmi mutations in the same vaccine strain so that LPS synthesis is dependent on the presence of both nonphosphorylated galactose and nonphosphorylated mannose, and therefore the synthesis of the LPS O-antigen and complete core ceases in vivo due to the unavailability of these nonphosphorylated sugars.

B. Arabinose-Dependent Regulated Synthesis of Virulence Traits to Result in Regulated Delayed Attenuation In Vivo

The second means with which to achieve regulated delayed attenuation relies on using a more tightly regulated araC PBAD activator-promoter (P = promoter)52 than the original sequence from E. coli B/r53,54 in place of upstream regulatory and promoter sequences for four genes needed for full display of virulence (Table 1, Part B). We deleted the promoter, including sequences for activator or repressor protein binding, for the following genes: fur, encoding the Fur protein, which represses all genes involved in iron acquisition and its absence attenuates Salmonella, presumably due to iron overload16; phoPQ, encoding a two-component regulatory system essential for virulence55; crp, encoding a cAMP receptor protein that is necessary for virulence of Salmonella and is also needed for maximal transcription from the PBAD promoter56,57; and rpoS, encoding a sigma factor needed to express genes required for survival in stationary phase, to respond to stresses, and for virulence.58,59 The absence of each gene by deletion attenuates S. typhi for mice and chickens. We then substituted the improved araC PBAD cassette to yield Salmonella strains with the ΔPfur::TT araC PBAD fur, ΔPphoPQ::TT araC PBAD phoPQ, ΔPcrp::TT araC PBAD crp and ΔPrpoS::TT araC PBAD rpoS deletion-insertion mutations (TT = transcription terminator, which is needed to preclude transcription of the araC gene from continuing into adjacent genes). In the case of the fur and phoPQ genes, we down-regulated their expression levels by altering SD (Shine-Dalgarno ribosome binding site) and start codon sequences. This was necessary because growth of vaccine strains in Luria broth plus 0.2% arabinose necessary to achieve high levels of repressor synthesis to enable the regulated delayed antigen synthesis phenotype as described below, leads to high concentrations of Fur and PhoP when expressed from wild-type sequences. Overexpression of Fur leads to iron starvation during growth and immunization that can be deleterious to maximal colonization of lymphoid tissues, and overproduction of PhoP also causes hyperattenuation to diminish immunogenicity. The various deletion-insertion mutations constructed with the best combination of modifications for transcription and translation are diagrammed in our recent paper.17 Growth of strains with these deletion-insertion mutations in the presence of arabinose leads to transcription of the fur, phoPQ, crp, and rpoS genes, but expression ceases in internal tissues because there is no free arabinose.52 Attenuation develops as the products of these genes decrease due to the dilution resulting from cell division. In the case of RpoS, the decrease is also due to proteolytic instability depending on growth stage and other stress factors,60 although predicting these states in vivo is difficult.

We can delay onset of attenuation by including ΔaraBAD23 (which deletes structural genes for catabolism of arabinose) to prevent use of arabinose retained in the cell cytoplasm at the time of oral immunization and/or ΔaraE25 (deletes gene for arabinose transport), which enhances the retention of arabinose (Table 1, Part E). Inclusion of the ΔaraBAD23 mutation also prevents acidification of the medium during growth of the vaccine strain in the presence of arabinose, an occurrence that can be detrimental to vaccine performance. Strains with the ΔPfur81::TT araC PBAD fur, ΔPphoPQ175::TT araC PBAD phoPQ, ΔPrpoS183::TT araC PBAD rpoS and ΔPcrp527::TT araC PBAD crp deletion-insertion mutations are totally attenuated at oral doses of 109 CFU in mice, although strains with the original ΔPfur33::TT araC PBAD fur mutation retain some virulence.17 This is undoubtedly due to the fact that the high concentration of Fur at the time of immunization delays onset of attenuation such that some mice inoculated with high doses do not survive. This observation served as the basis for decreasing Fur synthesis by altering SD and the start codon for the fur gene. However, mice surviving infection with strains having the ΔPfur81::TT araC PBAD fur, ΔPfur33::TT araC PBAD fur and ΔPcrp527::TT araC PBAD crp mutations all survive challenge with 109 CFU of the wild-type S. typhi UK-1 parent. In contrast, strains with the ΔPphoPQ107::TT araC PBAD phoPQ and ΔPrpoS183::TT araC PBAD rpoS mutations, although completely attenuated, are not quite as immunogenic, presumably because of overattenuation.17 Again, we altered the SD and the start codon for the phoP gene to improve the immunogenicity of strains with the regulated delayed phoPQ attenuation. Transcription of the PBAD promoter is dependent on both interaction of arabinose with the AraC protein and the Crp protein with the promoter sequence. We therefore include the ΔPcrp527::TT araC PBAD crp mutation as an added safety feature in vaccine strains, because Crp synthesis will also cease and serve as a second means to shut off expression of the fur, phoPQ, and/or rpoS genes fused to PBAD.17 This has yielded strains with three means of regulated delayed attenuation that have exhibited very high immunogenicity.21 It is likely that a combination of additional means for achieving regulated delayed attenuation might require additional tinkering to perfect the levels of expression of genes contributing to the attenuating phenotype.

C. Regulated Delayed Lysis In Vivo as a Means of Attenuation and Biological Containment

We have devised a host-vector system with arabinose-regulated expression of the chromosomal murA gene that encodes the first enzyme in muramic acid synthesis (due to an arabinose-dependent conditional-lethal ΔPmurA::TT araC PBAD murA deletion-insertion mutation) and a deletion-insertion ΔasdA::TT araC PBAD c2 mutation imposing a requirement for diaminopimelic acid (DAP) (Table 1, Part C). The complementing plasmid vector pYA3681 (Fig. 1) contains, as a cassette flanked by TT sequences, a tightly arabinose-regulated araC PBAD GTG-murA GTG-asdA followed by a C2-repressible P22 PR in the opposite orientation.52 The change in start codon from ATG to GTG for both the asdA and murA genes is important and reduces translation efficiency 10-fold. In the absence of these changes, cell division continues too long, often resulting in animal death. Another cassette contains the LacI-repressible Ptrc, followed by a cloning site for insertion of recombinant sequences encoding protective antigens, followed by another TT. This enables the lysis system to deliver a bolus of protective antigen at the time of cell lysis to stimulate the induction of a strong immune response. The third cassette contains the pBR ori, although we have versions with pSC101 ori, p15A ori and pUC ori. When this host-vector strain is grown in Luria broth plus 0.2% arabinose, synthesis of MurA and Asd enables cell wall synthesis, and production of C2 (from the chromosomal ΔasdA27::TT araC PBAD c2 mutation) will prevent transcription from PR to preclude synthesis of antisense asdA and murA mRNA (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The regulated programmed lysis system. A, Map of plasmid pYA3681. Plasmid sequences include the trpA, rrfG, and 5S ribosomal RNA transcriptional terminators; the PBAD, Ptrc, and P22 PR promoters; the araC gene; and the start codon-modified murA and asdA genes preceded by their SD sequences. B, Diagram of model illustrating the regulatory interactions in the programmed lysis system. Details of this system relative to expression of murA and asdA genes and repression of anti-mRNA and protective antigen gene transcription in vitro when arabinose is present and the opposite activities in vivo when arabinose is absent are detailed more fully in the text. (Slight modification of Figure 2 from Kong et al.,52 copyright 2008, National Academy of Sciences. Used with permission.)

In vivo, where there is an absence of arabinose,52 transcription of the murA and asdA genes cease and synthesis of antisense asdA and murA mRNA from PR commences as a means to shut down translation of any residual murA and/or asdA mRNA. This host-vector is totally avirulent at oral doses in excess of 109 CFU to BALB/c mice, and we have been so far unable to recover any arabinose-independent mutants, even in the presence of DAP. Strains with this regulated delayed lysis in vivo system are not recovered from orally immunized mice two to three weeks after oral immunization, although the vaccine strain can achieve colonization levels of about 105 CFU in spleens about one week after immunization. Any bacteria excreted are also unable to survive and undergo rapid, cell wall-less death. This is facilitated by the inclusion of a relA mutation (such as ΔrelA198::araC PBAD lacI TT, Table 1, Part D) that uncouples growth from a continuance of protein synthesis.

D. Combined Use of Multiple Means to Achieve Regulated Delayed Attenuation

It has been generally accepted as good practice in the attenuation of live bacterial vaccines to have two or more means to confer attenuation and thus ensure safety. Therefore, we have used two of the above-described strategies for achieving regulated delayed attenuation. We are now routinely using the ΔPfur81::TT araC PBAD fur and ΔPcrp527::TT araC PBAD crp deletion-insertion mutations in conjunction with the Δpmi-2426 mutation,21 because each of these three mutations contributes significantly to high immunogenicity.16,17,21 As an added safety feature and because of the increasing importance of biological containment, we are also beginning to add the regulated delayed lysis in vivo system for future RASV constructions.

III. RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN SYNTHESIS AND DELIVERY

A. Plasmid Vector Properties

RASVs should be sensitive to all antibiotics that might be useful for therapeutic use in treating individuals with unexpected consequences of immunization with live vaccines, especially if derived from S. typhi or S. paratyphi A. The use of traditional cloning vectors with selective drug-resistance genes to encode protective antigens is unacceptable from a safety perspective, and also cannot provide a means for selective maintenance of the plasmid vector in all live vaccine cells in vivo. To eliminate the use of plasmid vectors with drug-resistance genes and to stabilize plasmid vectors in RASVs in vivo, many years ago we developed a balanced-lethal vector-host system using a vaccine host strain with deletion of the asdA gene to impose an obligate requirement for DAP, and a plasmid vector with the wild-type asdA gene2,61 to establish a complementation heterozygote.

DAP is a unique constituent of the peptidoglycan layer of the bacterial cell wall necessary to maintain cell shape and stability. It is only synthesized by bacteria and is unavailable in tissues in the immunized host. An alternate strategy for stable maintenance of plasmid vectors in vaccine host strains can be accomplished62 through incorporation into plasmid vectors of a post-segregational killing system based on the noncatalytic hok-sok plasmid addiction system.63 In both cases, all viable recombinant vaccine cells in the immunized individual maintain the plasmid vector encoding the protective antigen(s).

Overexpression of the selective marker on plasmid vectors can contribute to the attenuation of the vaccine strain and lessen colonization efficiency and thus immunogenicity. We first observed this in regard to synthesis of the Asd enzyme on high-copy-number vectors with the pUC ori, in which the LD50 of a strain only possessing a ΔasdA mutation and the pUC ori Asd+ vector was increased about 10-fold over that of the wild-type parental strain.64 We therefore eliminated the PasdA sequence but not the SD sequence from Asd+ plasmids with the pBR ori (Fig. 2). Alternatively, or in addition as we use with pUC ori plasmids, changing the asdA gene start codon from ATG to GTG or TTG and/or with modification of the SD sequence for ribosome binding from AGGA to AAGG decreases the amount of Asd enzyme synthesized to an amount specified by a single-copy chromosomal gene, and thus restores the efficiency of colonization of lymphoid tissues to enhance immunogenicity.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Asd+ secretion vectors pYA4102 and pYA4106 with omission of PasdA but with retention of the SD sequence preceding the asdA gene start codon. The −35, −10, and SD sequences associated with Ptrc are indicated, and the translation start codon is in boldface. An arrow within the sequence indicates the signal peptidase cleavage site. Unique restriction enzyme sites in the multi-cloning site are indicated. 5ST1T2 is a transcriptional terminator. Both plasmids contain the pBR ori. A, ompA SS vector pYA4102. The map of pYA4102 and the nucleotide sequences of the Ptrc promoter region and multi-cloning sites are shown. B, phoA SS vector pYA4106. The map of pYA4106 and the nucleotide sequences of the Ptrc promoter region and multi-cloning sites are shown. (Slight modification of Figure 1 from Xin et al.20 and republished with permission from the American Society for Microbiology. Copyright 2008, American Society for Microbiology.)

The choice of plasmid copy number is important in regard to the nature of the protective antigen to be synthesized and delivered and the type of immune response desired. Thus, synthesis of a surface-localized pilus antigen is often best using low-copy-number plasmids with pIncI ori (single copy number) or pSC101 ori (low copy number). In contrast, for partial or total secretion of an antigen, it is often advantageous to use plasmids with p15A ori (moderate copy number), pBR ori (high copy number), and/or pUC ori (very high copy number). In general, the induction of significant mucosal and serum antibody responses is favored by maximizing the amount of antigen delivered to the immunized individual by using vectors with the p15A ori, pBR ori or pUC ori, whereas induction of cellular immunities is usually better achieved by delivering lower amounts of the protective antigen. Thus, the induction of CD8 T-cell responses using the Salmonella Type III secretion system (T3SS) is often better achieved by using low-copy-number plasmids with pSC101 ori or p15A ori,65,66 or even by incorporating the expression cassette into the chromosome.67

B. In Vivo and Regulated Delayed Synthesis of Protective Antigens

Overexpression of protective antigens by RASV strains (as well as overexpression of the selective marker) can reduce colonizing ability and thus immunogenicity. It was for this and other reasons that Chatfield et al.68 proposed the use of the nirB promoter (PnirB) that is more active anaerobically than aerobically in accord with a more likely in vivo anaerobic environment. The Ptrc that we have used,2,64,69 as well as Ptac, is constitutive under most environments but is more transcriptionally active both anaerobically and aerobically than the PnirB68 (see Fig. 1, lanes 2 and 5 vs. lanes 1 and 4 in Chatfield et al.68). We therefore developed a system in which transcription from Ptrc could be repressed during in vitro cultivation and following immunization with a gradual de-repression as a consequence of cell divisions occurring during colonization of internal lymphoid tissues. We thus generated the ΔrelA198::araC PBAD lacI TT deletion-insertion mutation so that recombinant vaccine strains growing in the presence of arabinose synthesize the LacI repressor to repress transcription from Ptrc on the plasmid expression vector until after vaccination, when the vaccine strain is already colonizing internal lymphoid tissues20,21 where arabinose is absent.52

This technology was incrementally improved to ultimately increase expression of the lacI gene 40-fold by changing the SD sequence from AGGG to AGGA, the wild-type lacI start codon from GTG to ATG, and by changing lacI codons to maximize translation efficiency in Salmonella. A similar strategy has been used to make synthesis of the phage P22 C2 repressor dependent on presence of arabinose in the growth medium to delay transcription of DNA sequences under the control of P22 PL and PR promoters to exhibit a regulated delayed in vivo expression. This was accomplished by the ΔasdA27::TT araC PBAD c2 deletion-insertion mutation.21,52 Other investigators have evaluated other promoters for in vivo expression of genetic information encoding protective antigens to be delivered by attenuated Salmonella vaccines. These include the PhoP-PhoQ regulated pagC promoter PpagC,70,71 the anaerobically induced promoter of the dmsA gene PdmsA,72 the ssrB-regulated PssaG promoter,73 and the stringent starvation sspA gene promoter PsspA.74 It is likely that further research to modify the DNA sequences for promoters and the sequences that interact with regulatory molecules will enable further improvements to modulate the synthesis of protective antigens in a manner that maximizes the induction of the desired immune responses. Many of these modifications are likely to be vaccine specific.

C. Antigen Delivery Strategies

Most early investigations of RASV strains for the delivery of protective antigens used vaccine strains in which the protective antigen synthesized was retained in the cytoplasm of the attenuated Salmonella strain, thus necessitating that the immunized host disrupt the cells to release the protective antigen for processing. This probably explains the minimal successes in early studies using RASV strains to induce significant protective immunity to heterologous pathogens, whether in mice or humans. Several years ago,64 we learned that export of antigens to the periplasm of vaccine strains yielded superior antibody titers than if the protective antigen was retained in the cytoplasm of the vaccine strain.75 We initially used the β-lactamase Type II secretion system (T2SS),64 but now have validated use of the phoA, ompA, lpp, eltB (Type II), and dsbA signal sequences with equally good results.20,76 In these various vectors, we use either Ptrc or P22 PL as promoters with expression levels controlled by the LacI and C2 repressors, respectively. Others have investigated use of the E. coli hemolysin secretion system (Type I secretion system) to export protective antigens.77,78 Also, results have been very positive using the clyA secretion system to externalize protective antigens from Salmonella vaccine strains.79 It is likely that the high immunogenicity of protective antigens secreted by the T2SS is due to the formation of outer membrane vesicles that incorporate antigens secreted into the periplasmic space. It has now been established that the production of such vesicles leads to targeting of antigens to antigen-presenting dendritic cells.46 As already noted above, the T3SS has been effectively used to deliver protective antigens to the cytosol of cells in the immunized host to enable MHC class I presentation to stimulate CD8 T-cell responses.65,80,81 Lastly, E. coli, Salmonella, and other enterics have Type V secretion systems, and the first such autotransporter in the Enterobacteriaceae was discovered and described by us.82 It is thus likely that α-helical domains of protective antigens could be delivered by such transporters; the AIDA autotransporter has been so evaluated.83 The last type of antigen delivery is achieved by the regulated delayed lysis strategy, which confers biological containment while being able to deliver a bolus of protective antigen at the time of in vivo vaccine strain cell lysis.52

D. Modification of Regulatory and Coding Sequences to Maximize Immunogenic Results

RASV design to enable induction of protective immunity to some heterologous pathogens requires the selection and delivery of one or more protective antigens from the targeted heterologous pathogen. A full discussion of the means for identification of such protective antigens is beyond the scope of this review. However, many of these antigens are surface-localized or secreted by pathogens, and the desired protective immune responses neutralize toxins, lysins, enzymes, viruses, etc., or block attachment (adherence), invasion, and/or survival to preclude colonization. Before cloning a DNA sequence encoding a putative protective protein antigen, one must decide whether the objective is to induce mucosal and/or serum antibodies or cellular immunity. This, of course, depends on the nature and life style of the pathogen. If the former, then delivery of the antigen in high amounts to the surface or periplasmic space of the RASV should be engineered. Achieving this is not always easy. The first step in designing the construction is to make a full examination of the amino acid sequence and structural properties of the protein, examine the DNA sequence for G+C content and codons used, and the mRNA structure for potential hairpins. The presence of multiple Cys residues can be indicative of folding properties that would preclude secretion, and extensive hydrophobic sequences can also lead to toxicities and impairment in secretion. Deletion or modification of such sequences can often eliminate problems in synthesis and delivery.84 If the protein is normally secreted, it may still be desirable to substitute the signal peptide sequence for a signal sequence from a protein efficiently secreted by Salmonella.64 Efficient translation of mRNA can be achieved by changing all of the codons used less often than 5% to 10% of the time in Salmonella highly expressed genes.8587

We have also adjusted the G+C content to within approximately 4% of the Salmonella DNA G+C content during codon optimization because Salmonella expresses genes within islands of DNA acquired by horizontal gene transfer whose G+C content deviates by ±4% from the Salmonella average. Translation efficiency can also be improved by changing the SD sequence or its distance to the start codon and also by making the second and third codons A rich.88 Lastly, because hairpins in mRNA might contribute to RNaseE attack to reduce mRNA half-life, base-pair changes that do not alter the amino acid sequence can be used to eliminate these targets for mRNA stability.86 Once cloning vectors are constructed under the control of a repressible promoter, one examines growth rate and plasmid stability (over approximately 50 generations) with and without antigen synthesis and with and without selective pressure for maintenance of the plasmid vector. Slow growth and/or plasmid instability due to antigen synthesis often are indicative of a poor ability of the RASV to effectively colonize effector lymphoid tissues necessary to induce high-level immune responses. Such results warrant further modifications, which might include using a plasmid vector with a reduced plasmid copy number. We also examine antigen stability by following persistence of antigen amount after adding chloramphenicol to the culture maintained at 37°C.17 If degradation products are detected, we examine the amino acid sequence for protease cleavage sites and determine if any of these could possibly generate the fragment(s) detected. If so, amino acid substitutions are introduced to see if this enhances protein stability to enhance induction of protective immunity. Cell-fractionation studies,64,89 in conjunction with western blotting, reveal the proportion of synthesized antigens present in various cellular and extracellular compartments.

The complexities in the synthesis and delivery of protective antigens to stimulate T-cell immunities are less than detailed above for antigens to be synthesized at a high enough level to stimulate systemic antibody responses. However, not all proteins or peptides are efficiently transmitted through the T3SS needle, and therefore must be delivered to cells in the immunized host by other methods, such as by using a RASV with regulated delayed lysis in vivo. In these cases, lysis in the endosome or cytosol would be expected to yield predominantly CD4 and CD8 responses, respectively.

IV. BIOLOGICAL CONTAINMENT OF RASV STRAINS

Live vaccines that are orally administered have the potential to be excreted in a viable form that might lead to persistence in the environment to lead to immunization (even if ineffective) of those unintended to be vaccinated. In this regard, vaccine strains with multiple mutations that might impair growth, due to the need for required nutrients or the inability to use available substrates, are likely to have reduced survivability in the environment; additional mutations that eliminate the synthesis of surface components needed to form biofilms would likely further reduce such survival. The RASV-regulated delayed lysis system dependent on the absence of arabinose52 affords another type of biological containment. However, arabinose present in complex polysaccharides present in foods of plant origin can be released by the actions of other microorganisms in intestinal contents and possibly in other ex vivo environments. Thus, cessation of the synthesis of cell wall peptidoglycan would be more gradually achieved with resulting death by lysis. The inclusion of a relA mutation in these strains uncouples the occurrence of growth-dependent lysis on a need for continued protein synthesis. Because production of a colanic acid capsule can enable survival of cells undergoing cell wall-less death,90 the inclusion of the Δ(gmd-fcl) mutation in these strains precludes synthesis of a colanic acid capsule and facilitates cell wall-less death. Undoubtedly, further improved methods for achieving biological containment will be discovered.

V. OTHER IMPORTANT RASV ATTRIBUTES

Salmonella, like many pathogens, has devised means to contend with innate immunity and to suppress or modulate induction of immune responses. Most of these means remain undiscovered, but as discoveries are made, RASV strains need to be modified to inactivate these Salmonella defense strategies. The SopB protein plays an immunosuppressive role,91 and its inactivation results in improved humoral and cellular immunity91—especially mucosal immunity.92 An added benefit of including a ΔsopB mutation in S. typhi vaccine strains is that it reduces fluid secretion90 to lessen the mild diarrhea experienced by a small percentage of vaccinees.93,94

While striving to enhance the immunogenicity of RASV strains, it is of critical importance to also enhance safety for animals as well as humans. In regard to humans, the increases in individuals with immunosuppression due to infection, genetic factors, and increasing age is a cause for concern in using live attenuated bacterial vaccines. Preferably, these vaccines would be safe for such individuals as well as for infants, pregnant women, and those who are malnourished. However, at this stage we are not sure whether such safety has been achieved, because results with RASV strains derived from S. typhi and tested in mice and other animals do not necessarily predict the behavior of RASV strains derived from S. typhi and evaluated in humans. In this regard, many of the previously studied means of attenuation, which render S. typhi totally attenuated and highly immunogenic in mice, fail to render S. typhi attenuated for humans.95,96 There is also the issue of whether a Salmonella vaccine vector used to deliver protective antigens from one heterologous pathogen to induce protective immunity to that pathogen can be used a second or even third time to effectively deliver protective antigens from another heterologous pathogen to the same individuals vaccinated with the first RASV. Certainly, vaccine strains attenuated by traditional means used in the past are disappointing in this regard and fail to have utility for repeated use.97

VI. CONCLUSION

Much progress has been made in improving the technologies to design, construct, and evaluate RASVs for oral, needle-free immunizations. Many of these improvements have enhanced safety, tolerability, and effectiveness in inducing protective immunity. These technologies are now being used to develop vaccines to protect against important diseases of agriculturally important animals, as well as vaccines using genetically engineered strains of S. typhi to protect against a number of important human infectious diseases. In this regard, we have succeeded at least in constructing S. typhi-based RASV strains that induce equal or higher serum and mucosal immune responses to delivered protective antigens from S. pneumoniae than to Salmonella outer membrane protein and LPS surface antigens.21 Evaluation of S. typhi strains with similar properties in human volunteers will soon reveal whether these technologies have practical significance in the development of cost-effective and safe vaccines for humans.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Erika Arch for help in assembling this article and Josephine Clark-Curtiss and Kenneth Roland for editorial and content advice. Research was supported by grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the US Department of Agriculture, and the Ellison Medical Foundation.

ABBREVIATIONS

RASV

recombinant attenuated Salmonella vaccine

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

GI

gastrointestinal

CFU

colony-forming units

UDP

uridine diphosphate

DAP

diaminopimelic acid

REFERENCES

  • 1.Curtiss R, III, Nakayama K, Kelly SM. Recombinant avirulent Salmonella vaccine strains with stable maintenance and high level expression of cloned genes in vivo. Immunol Invest. 1989;18(1–4):583–596. doi: 10.3109/08820138909112265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nakayama K, Kelly SM, Curtiss R., III Construction of an Asd + expression-cloning vector: stable maintenance and high level expression of cloned genes in a Salmonella vaccine strain. Bio/Technology. 1988;6:693–697. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Curtiss R, III, Kelly SM, Gulig PA, Nakayama K. Selective delivery of antigens by recombinant bacteria. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1989;146:35–49. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-74529-4_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Curtiss R, III, Kelly SM, Gulig PA, Nakayama K. Stable recombinant avirulent Salmonella vaccine strains. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1989;251:33–47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2046-4_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Galen JE, Levine MM. Can a ‘flawless’ live vector vaccine strain be engineered? Trends Microbiol. 2001;9(8):372–376. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(01)02096-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Curtiss R., III . Antigen delivery systems: development of live recombinant attenuated bacterial antigen and DNA vaccine delivery vector vaccines. In: Mestecky J, Lamm ME, Strober W, Bienenstock J, McGhee JR, Mayer L, editors. Mucosal immunology. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kwon YM, Cox MM, Calhoun LN. Salmonella-based vaccines for infectious diseases. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2007;6(2):147–152. doi: 10.1586/14760584.6.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Galen JE, Pasetti MF, Tennant S, Ruiz-Olvera P, Sztein MB, Levine MM. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi live vector vaccines finally come of age. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009 Jul;87(5):400–412. doi: 10.1038/icb.2009.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Park SM, Ko HJ, Shim DH, Yang JY, Park YH, Curtiss R, III, Kweon MN. MyD88 signaling is not essential for induction of antigen-specific B cell responses but is indispensable for protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection following oral vaccination with attenuated Salmonella expressing PspA antigen. J Immunol. 2008;181(9):6447–6455. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.6447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ko HJ, Yang JY, Shim DH, Yang H, Park SM, Curtiss R, III, Kweon MN. Innate immunity mediated by MyD88 signal is not essential for induction of lipopolysaccharide-specific B cell responses but is indispensable for protection against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. J Immunol. 2009;182(4):2305–2312. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Foster JW. The acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium involves transient synthesis of key acid shock proteins. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(7):1981–1987. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.7.1981-1987.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Foster JW. Low pH adaptation and the acid tolerance response of Salmonella typhimurium. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1995;21(4):215–237. doi: 10.3109/10408419509113541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gunn JS. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance and response to bile. Microbes Infect. 2000;2(8):907–913. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00392-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Prouty AM, Gunn JS. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium invasion is repressed in the presence of bile. Infect Immun. 2000;68(12):6763–6769. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.12.6763-6769.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Groisman EA, Parra-Lopez C, Salcedo M, Lipps CJ, Heffron F. Resistance to host antimicrobial peptides is necessary for Salmonella virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(24):11939–11943. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Curtiss R, III, Zhang X, Wanda SY, Kang HY, Konjufca V, Li Y, Gunn B, Wang S, Scarpellini G, Lee IS. Induction of host immune responses using Salmonella-vectored vaccines. In: Brogden KA, Minion FC, Cornick N, Stanton TB, Zhang Q, Nolan LK, Wannemuehler MJ, editors. Virulence mechanisms of bacterial pathogens. 4th ed. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Curtiss R, III, Wanda SY, Gunn BM, Zhang X, Tinge SA, Ananthnarayan V, Mo H, Wang S, Kong W. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains with regulated delayed attenuation in vivo. Infect Immun. 2009;77(3):1071–1082. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00693-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chatfield SN, Strahan K, Pickard D, Charles IG, Hormaeche CE, Dougan G. Evaluation of Salmonella typhimurium strains harbouring defined mutations in htrA and aroA in the murine salmonellosis model. Microb Pathog. 1992;12(2):145–151. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(92)90117-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Curtiss R., III Bacterial infectious disease control by vaccine development. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(8):1061–1066. doi: 10.1172/JCI16941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xin W, Wanda SY, Li Y, Wang S, Mo H, Curtiss R., III Analysis of type II secretion of recombinant pneumococcal PspA and PspC in a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine with regulated delayed antigen synthesis. Infect Immun. 2008;76(7):3241–3254. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01623-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li Y, Wang S, Scarpellini G, Gunn B, Xin W, Wanda SY, Roland KL, Curtiss R., III Evaluation of new generation Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccines with regulated delayed attenuation to induce immune responses against PspA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(2):593–598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811697106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Greenwood B. The epidemiology of pneumococcal infection in children in the developing world. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354(1384):777–785. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nnalue NA, Lindberg AA. Salmonella choleraesuis strains deficient in O antigen remain fully virulent for mice by parenteral inoculation but are avirulent by oral administration. Infect Immun. 1990;58(8):2493–2501. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.8.2493-2501.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Roantree RJ. The relationship of lipopolysaccharide structure to bacterial virulence. In: Weinbaum G, Kadis S, Ajl S, editors. Microbial toxins. Vol 5. New York: Academic Press; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Finlay BB, Starnbach MN, Francis CL, Stocker BA, Chatfield S, Dougan G, Falkow S. Identification and characterization of TnphoA mutants of Salmonella that are unable to pass through a polarized MDCK epithelial cell monolayer. Mol Microbiol. 1988;2(6):757–766. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1988.tb00087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stone BJ, Garcia CM, Badger JL, Hassett T, Smith RI, Miller VL. Identification of novel loci affecting entry of Salmonella enteritidis into eukaryotic cells. J Bacteriol. 1992;174(12):3945–3952. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.12.3945-3952.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fields PI, Swanson RV, Haidaris CG, Heffron F. Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium that cannot survive within the macrophage are avirulent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83(14):5189–5193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.14.5189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Finlay BB, Brumell JH. Salmonella interactions with host cells: in vitro to in vivo. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000;355(1397):623–631. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reeves P. Role of O-antigen variation in the immune response. Trends Microbiol. 1995;3(10):381–386. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)88983-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rowley D. Sensitivity of rough gram-negative bacteria to the bactericidal action of serum. J Bacteriol. 1968;95(5):1647–1650. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.5.1647-1650.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hensel M, Shea JE, Gleeson C, Jones MD, Dalton E, Holden DW. Simultaneous identification of bacterial virulence genes by negative selection. Science. 1995;269(5222):400–403. doi: 10.1126/science.7618105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mahan MJ, Heithoff DM, Sinsheimer RL, Low DA. Assessment of bacterial pathogenesis by analysis of gene expression in the host. Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:139–164. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Muotiala A, Hovi M, Makela PH. Protective immunity in mouse salmonellosis: comparison of smooth and rough live and killed vaccines. Microb Pathog. 1989;6(1):51–60. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(89)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith HW. The use of live vaccines in experimental Salmonella gallinarum infections in chickens with observations on their interference effect. J Hygiene. 1956;54(3):419–432. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400044685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lin ECC. Dissimilatory pathways for sugars, polyols, and carbohydrates. In: Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Raetz CRH. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides: a remakable family of bioactive macroamphiphiles. In: Neidhardt FC, Curtiss R III, Ingraham JL, Lin ECC, Low KB, Magasanik B, Reznikoff WS, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger HE, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Germanier R, Furer E. Immunity in experimental salmonellosis. II. Basis for the avirulence and protective capacity of galE mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. Infect Immun. 1971;4(6):663–673. doi: 10.1128/iai.4.6.663-673.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fukasawa T, Nikaido H. Galactose sensitive mutants of Salmonella. Nature. 1959;184:1168–1169. doi: 10.1038/1841168a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fukasawa T, Nikaido H. Galactose sensitive mutants of Salmonella II. Bacteriolysis induced by galactose. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961;48:470–483. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90045-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Clarke RC, Gyles CL. Galactose epimeraseless mutants of Salmonella typhimurium as live vaccines for calves. Can J Vet Res. 1986;50(2):165–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nnalue NA, Stocker BA. Test of the virulence and live-vaccine efficacy of auxotrophic and galE derivatives of Salmonella choleraesuis. Infect Immun. 1987;55(4):955–962. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.4.955-962.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Markovitz A, Sydiskis RJ, Lieberman MM. Genetic and biochemical studies on mannose-negative mutants that are deficient in phosphomannose isomerase in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1967;94(5):1492–1496. doi: 10.1128/jb.94.5.1492-1496.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rosen SM, Zeleznick LD, Fraenkel D, Wiener IM, Osborn MJ, Horecker BL. Characterization of the cell wall lipopolysaccharide of a mutant of Salmonella typhimurium lacking phosphomannose isomerase. Biochem Z. 1965;342(4):375–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Collins LV, Attridge S, Hackett J. Mutations at rfc or pmi attenuate Salmonella typhimurium virulence for mice. Infect Immun. 1991;59(3):1079–1085. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.3.1079-1085.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kuehn MJ, Kesty NC. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles and the host-pathogen interaction. Genes Dev. 2005;19(22):2645–2655. doi: 10.1101/gad.1299905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Alaniz RC, Deatherage BL, Lara JC, Cookson BT. Membrane vesicles are immunogenic facsimiles of Salmonella typhimurium that potently activate dendritic cells, prime B and T cell responses, and stimulate protective immunity in vivo. J Immunol. 2007;179(11):7692–7701. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.11.7692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nnalue NA. All accessible epitopes in the Salmonella lipopolysaccharide core are associated with branch residues. Infect Immun. 1999;67(2):998–1003. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.2.998-1003.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stanislavsky ES, Makarenko TA, Kholodkova EV, Lugowski C. R-form lipopolysaccharides (LPS) of Gram-negative bacteria as possible vaccine antigens. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1997;18(3):139–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1997.tb01039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jansson PE, Lindberg AA, Lindberg B, Wollin R. Structural studies on the hexose region of the core in lipopolysaccharides from Enterobacteriaceae. Eur J Biochem. 1981;115(3):571–577. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb06241.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lüderitz O, Westphal O, Staub AM, Nikaido H. Isolation and chemical and immunological characterization of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. In: Weinbaum G, Kadis S, Ajl S, editors. Microbial toxins. Vol 4. New York: Academic Press; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Olsthoorn MM, Petersen BO, Schlecht S, Haverkamp J, Bock K, Thomas-Oates JE, Holst O. Identification of a novel core type in Salmonella lipopolysaccharide. Complete structural analysis of the core region of the lipopolysaccharide from Salmonella enterica sv. Arizonae O62. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(7):3817–3829. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.7.3817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kong W, Wanda SY, Zhang X, Bollen W, Tinge SA, Roland KL, Curtiss R., III Regulated programmed lysis of recombinant Salmonella in host tissues to release protective antigens and confer biological containment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(27):9361–9366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803801105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guzman LM, Belin D, Carson MJ, Beckwith J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(14):4121–4130. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Menon KP, Lee NL. Activation of ara operons by a truncated AraC protein does not require inducer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(10):3708–3712. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.10.3708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Miller SI, Kukral AM, Mekalanos JJ. A two-component regulatory system (phoP phoQ) controls Salmonella typhimurium virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(13):5054–5058. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.13.5054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Curtiss R, III, Kelly SM. Salmonella typhimurium deletion mutants lacking adenylate cyclase and cyclic AMP receptor protein are avirulent and immunogenic. Infect Immun. 1987;55(12):3035–3043. doi: 10.1128/iai.55.12.3035-3043.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dunn TM, Schleif R. Deletion analysis of the Escherichia coli ara PC and PBAD promoters. J Mol Biol. 1984;180(1):201–204. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90437-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zambrano MM, Siegele DA, Almiron M, Tormo A, Kolter R. Microbial competition: Escherichia coli mutants that take over stationary phase cultures. Science. 1993;259(5102):1757–1760. doi: 10.1126/science.7681219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fang FC, Libby SJ, Buchmeier NA, Loewen PC, Switala J, Harwood J, Guiney DG. The alternative sigma factor katF (rpoS) regulates Salmonella virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(24):11978–11982. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Takayanagi Y, Tanaka K, Takahashi H. Structure of the 5’ upstream region and the regulation of the rpoS gene of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1994;243(5):525–531. doi: 10.1007/BF00284200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Galán JE, Nakayama K, Curtiss R., III Cloning and characterization of the asd gene of Salmonella typhimurium: use in stable maintenance of recombinant plasmids in Salmonella vaccine strains. Gene. 1990;94(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90464-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Galen JE, Nair J, Wang JY, Wasserman SS, Tanner MK, Sztein MB, Levine MM. Optimization of plasmid maintenance in the attenuated live vector vaccine strain Salmonella typhi CVD 908-htrA. Infect Immun. 1999;67(12):6424–6433. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.12.6424-6433.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gerdes K. The parB(hok/sok) locus of plasmid R1: a general purpose plasmid stabilization system. Bio/Technology. 1988;6:1402–1405. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kang HY, Srinivasan J, Curtiss R., III Immune responses to recombinant pneumococcal PspA antigen delivered by live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine. Infect Immun. 2002;70(4):1739–1749. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.4.1739-1749.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rüssmann H, Shams H, Poblete F, Fu Y, Galán JE, Donis RQ. Delivery of epitopes by the Salmonella type III secretion system for vaccine development. Science. 1998;281:565–568. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5376.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Konjufca V, Jenkins M, Wang S, Juarez-Rodriguez MD, Curtiss R., III Immunogenicity of recombinant attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine strains carrying a gene that encodes Eimeria tenella antigen SO7. Infect Immun. 2008;76(12):5745–5753. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00897-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Husseiny MI, Hensel M. Evaluation of Salmonella live vaccines with chromosomal expression cassettes for translocated fusion proteins. Vaccine. 2009;27(28):3780–3787. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Chatfield SN, Charles IG, Makoff AJ, Oxer MD, Dougan G, Pickard D, Slater D, Fairweather NF. Use of the nirB promoter to direct the stable expression of heterologous antigens in Salmonella oral vaccine strains: development of a single-dose oral tetanus vaccine. Bio/Technology. 1992;10:888–892. doi: 10.1038/nbt0892-888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Schödel F, Kelly SM, Peterson D, Milich D, Hughes J, Tinge S, Wirtz R, Curtiss R., III Development of recombinant Salmonellae expressing hybrid hepatitis B virus core particles as candidate oral vaccines. Dev Biol Stand. 1994;82:151–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hohmann EL, Oletta CA, Loomis WP, Miller SI. Macrophage-inducible expression of a model antigen in Salmonella typhimurium enhances immunogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(7):2904–2908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bumann D. Regulated antigen expression in live recombinant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strongly affects colonization capabilities and specific CD4(+)-T-cell responses. Infect Immun. 2001;69(12):7493–7500. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7493-7500.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Orr N, Galen JE, Levine MM. Novel use of anaerobically induced promoter, dmsA, for controlled expression of fragment C of tetanus toxin in live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain CVD 908-htrA. Vaccine. 2001;19(13–14):1694–1700. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00400-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Stratford R, McKelvie ND, Hughes NJ, Aldred E, Wiseman C, Curtis J, Bellaby T, Bentley M, Hindle Z, Brennan FR, Chatfield SN, Dougan G, Khan SA. Optimization of Salmonella enterica serovar typhi DeltaaroC DeltassaV derivatives as vehicles for delivering heterologous antigens by chromosomal integration and in vivo inducible promoters. Infect Immun. 2005;73(1):362–368. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.1.362-368.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Terry TD, Downes JE, Dowideit SJ, Mabbett AN, Jennings MP. Investigation of ansB and sspA derived promoters for multi- and single-copy antigen expression in attenuated Salmonella enterica var. typhimurium. Vaccine. 2005;23(36):4521–4531. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kang HY, Curtiss R., III Immune responses dependent on antigen location in recombinant attenuated Salmonella typhimurium vaccines following oral immunization. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;37(2–3):99–104. doi: 10.1016/S0928-8244(03)00063-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zekarias B, Mo H, Curtiss R., III Recombinant attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium expressing the carboxy-terminal domain of alpha toxin from Clostridium perfringens induces protective responses against necrotic enteritis in chickens. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15(5):805–816. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00457-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Osorio M, Wu Y, Singh S, Merkel TJ, Bhattacharyya S, Blake MS, Kopecko DJ. Anthrax protective antigen delivered by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi Ty21a protects mice from a lethal anthrax spore challenge. Infect Immun. 2009;77(4):1475–1482. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00828-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hotz C, Fensterle J, Goebel W, Meyer SR, Kirchgraber G, Heisig M, Furer A, Dietrich G, Rapp UR, Gentschev I. Improvement of the live vaccine strain Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi Ty21a for antigen delivery via the hemolysin secretion system of Escherichia coli. Int J Med Microbiol. 2009;299(2):109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2008.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Galen JE, Zhao L, Chinchilla M, Wang JY, Pasetti MF, Green J, Levine MM. Adaptation of the endogenous Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi clyA-encoded hemolysin for antigen export enhances the immunogenicity of anthrax protective antigen domain 4 expressed by the attenuated live-vector vaccine strain CVD 908-htrA. Infect Immun. 2004;72(12):7096–7106. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.12.7096-7106.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rüssmann H, Igwe EI, Sauer J, Hardt WD, Bubert A, Geginat G. Protection against murine listeriosis by oral vaccination with recombinant Salmonella expressing hybrid Yersinia type III proteins. J Immunol. 2001;167(1):357–365. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Shams H, Poblete F, Russmann H, Galán JE, Donis RQ. Induction of specific CD8+ memory T cells and long lasting protection following immunization with Salmonella typhimurium expressing a lymphocytic choriomeningitis MHC class I-restricted epitope. Vaccine. 2001;20(3–4):577–585. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00363-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Provence DL, Curtiss R., III Isolation and characterization of a gene involved in hemagglutination by an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Infect Immun. 1994;62(4):1369–1380. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.4.1369-1380.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Buddenborg C, Daudel D, Liebrecht S, Greune L, Humberg V, Schmidt MA. Development of a tripartite vector system for live oral immunization using a gram-negative probiotic carrier. Int J Med Microbiol. 2008;298(1–2):105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Srinivasan J, Tinge S, Wright R, Herr JC, Curtiss R., III Oral immunization with attenuated Salmonella expressing human sperm antigen induces antibodies in serum and the reproductive tract. Biol Reprod. 1995;53(2):462–471. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod53.2.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kane JF. Effects of rare codon clusters on high-level expression of heterologous proteins in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1995;6(5):494–500. doi: 10.1016/0958-1669(95)80082-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S, Minshull J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends in biotechnology. 2004;22(7):346–353. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Burgess-Brown NA, Sharma S, Sobott F, Loenarz C, Oppermann U, Gileadi O. Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: A multi-gene study. Protein expression and purification. 2008;59(1):94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2008.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stenström CM, Jin H, Major LL, Tate WP, Isaksson LA. Codon bias at the 3’-side of the initiation codon is correlated with translation initiation efficiency in Escherichia coli. Gene. 2001;263(1–2):273–284. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00550-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Witholt B, Boekhout M, Brock M, Kingma J, Heerikhuizen HV, Leij LD. An efficient and reproducible procedure for the formation of spheroplasts from variously grown Escherichia coli. Anal Biochem. 1976;74(1):160–170. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90320-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Curtiss R, III, Pereira DA, Hsu JC, Hull SC, Clark JE, Maturin LJ, Sr, Goldschmidt R, Moody R, Inoue M, Alexander L. Biological containment: The subordination of Escherichia coil K-12. In: Beers RF Jr, Bassett EG, editors. Recombinant molecules: impact on science and society. New York: Raven Press; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Link C, Ebensen T, Standner L, Dejosez M, Reinhard E, Rharbaoui F, Guzman CA. An SopB-mediated immune escape mechanism of Salmonella enterica can be subverted to optimize the performance of live attenuated vaccine carrier strains. Microbes Infect. 2006;8(8):2262–2269. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2006.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li Y, Wang S, Xin W, Scarpellini G, Shi Z, Gunn B, Roland KL, Curtiss R., III A sopB deletion mutation enhances the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a heterologous antigen delivered by live attenuated Salmonella enterica vaccines. Infect Immun. 2008;76(11):5238–5246. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00720-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Dilts DA, Riesenfeld-Orn I, Fulginiti JP, Ekwall E, Granert C, Nonenmacher J, Brey RN, Cryz SJ, Karlsson K, Bergman K, Thompson T, Hu B, Bruckner AH, Lindberg AA. Phase I clinical trials of aroA aroD and aroA aroD htrA attenuated S. typhi vaccines; effect of formulation on safety and immunogenicity. Vaccine. 2000;18(15):1473–1784. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(99)00424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Levine MM, Galen J, Tacket CO, Barry EM, Pasetti F, Sztein MB. Attenuated strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi as live oral vaccines against typhoid fever. In: Levine MM, Kaper JB, Rappuoli R, Liu MA, Good MF, editors. New generation vaccines. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hone DM, Attridge SR, Forrest B, Morona R, Daniels D, LaBrooy JT, Bartholomeusz RC, Shearman DJ, Hackett J. A galE via (Vi antigen-negative) mutant of Salmonella typhi Ty2 retains virulence in humans. Infect Immun. 1988;56(5):1326–1333. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.5.1326-1333.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Tacket CO, Hone DM, Curtiss R, III, Kelly SM, Losonsky G, Guers L, Harris AM, Edelman R, Levine MM. Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of ΔaroC ΔaroD and Δcya Δcrp Salmonella typhi strains in adult volunteers. Infect Immun. 1992;60(2):536–541. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.2.536-541.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Gahan ME, Webster DE, Wijburg OL, Wesselingh SL, Strugnell RA. Impact of prior immunological exposure on vaccine delivery by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Vaccine. 2008;26(49):6212–6220. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES