Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 1991 Jun;128(2):453–469. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.2.453

On the Evolution of Genetic Incompatibility Systems. VI. a Three-Locus Modifier Model for the Origin of Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility

M K Uyenoyama 1
PMCID: PMC1204482  PMID: 2071024

Abstract

Recent genetic analyses have demonstrated that self-incompatibility in flowering plants derives from the coordinated expression of a system of loci. To address the selective mechanisms through which a genetic system of this kind evolves, I present a three-locus model for the origin of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Conventional models assume that a single locus encodes all physiological effects associated with self-incompatibility and that the viability of offspring depends only on whether they were derived by selfing or outcrossing. My model explicitly represents the genetic determination of offspring viability by a locus subject to symmetrically overdominant selection. Initially, the level of expression of the proto-S locus is insufficient to induce self-incompatibility. Weak gametophytic self-incompatibility arises upon the introduction of a rare allele at an unlinked modifier locus which enhances the expression of the proto-S locus. While conventional models predict that the origin of self-incompatibility requires at least two- to threefold levels of inbreeding depression, I find that the comparatively low levels of inbreeding depression generated by a single overdominant locus can ensure the invasion of an enhancer of self-incompatibility under sufficiently high rates of receipt of self-pollen. Associations among components of the incompatibility system promote the origin of self-incompatibility. Enhancement of heterozygosity at the initially neutral proto-S locus improves offspring viability through associative overdominance. Further, the modifier that enhances the expression of self-incompatibility develops a direct association with heterozygosity at the overdominant viability locus. These results suggest that the evolutionary processes by which incompatibility systems originate may differ significantly from those associated with their breakdown. The genetic mechanism explored here may apply to the evolution of other systems that restrict reproduction, including maternal-fetal incompatibility in mammals.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson M. A., McFadden G. I., Bernatzky R., Atkinson A., Orpin T., Dedman H., Tregear G., Fernley R., Clarke A. E. Sequence variability of three alleles of the self-incompatibility gene of Nicotiana alata. Plant Cell. 1989 May;1(5):483–491. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.5.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell R. B. The interdependence of mating structure and inbreeding depression. Theor Popul Biol. 1986 Oct;30(2):232–244. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(86)90035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockerham C. C., Weir B. S. Sib mating with two linked loci. Genetics. 1968 Nov;60(3):629–640. doi: 10.1093/genetics/60.3.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cornish E. C., Anderson M. A., Clarke A. E. Molecular aspects of fertilization in flowering plants. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:209–228. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.001233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hammerberg C., Klein J. Linkage disequilibrium between H-2 and t complexes in chromosome 17 of the mouse. Nature. 1975 Nov 27;258(5533):296–299. doi: 10.1038/258296a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haring V., Gray J. E., McClure B. A., Anderson M. A., Clarke A. E. Self-incompatibility: a self-recognition system in plants. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):937–941. doi: 10.1126/science.2237440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris P. J., Weinhandl J. A., Clarke A. E. Effect on in Vitro Pollen Growth of an Isolated Style Glycoprotein Associated with Self-Incompatibility in Nicotiana alata. Plant Physiol. 1989 Jan;89(1):360–367. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.1.360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jahnen W., Lush W. M., Clarke A. E. Inhibition of in Vitro Pollen Tube Growth by Isolated S-Glycoproteins of Nicotiana alata. Plant Cell. 1989 May;1(5):501–510. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.5.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kandasamy M. K., Dwyer K. G., Paolillo D. J., Doney R. C., Nasrallah J. B., Nasrallah M. E. Brassica S-Proteins Accumulate in the Intercellular Matrix along the Path of Pollen Tubes in Transgenic Tobacco Pistils. Plant Cell. 1990 Jan;2(1):39–49. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McClure B. A., Haring V., Ebert P. R., Anderson M. A., Simpson R. J., Sakiyama F., Clarke A. E. Style self-incompatibility gene products of Nicotiana alata are ribonucleases. Nature. 1989 Dec 21;342(6252):955–957. doi: 10.1038/342955a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore H. M., Nasrallah J. B. A Brassica Self-Incompatibility Gene Is Expressed in the Stylar Transmitting Tissue of Transgenic Tobacco. Plant Cell. 1990 Jan;2(1):29–38. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.1.29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nasrallah J. B., Yu S. M., Nasrallah M. E. Self-incompatibility genes of Brassica oleracea: Expression, isolation, and structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(15):5551–5555. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.15.5551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nasrallah M. E. Genetic control of quantitative variation in self-incompatibility proteins detected by immunodiffusion. Genetics. 1974 Jan;76(1):45–50. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sarker R. H., Elleman C. J., Dickinson H. G. Control of pollen hydration in Brassica requires continued protein synthesis, and glycosylation in necessary for intraspecific incompatibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4340–4344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sturm S., Figueroa F., Klein J. The relationship between t and H-2 complexes in wild mice. I. The H-2 haplotypes of 20 t-bearing strains. Genet Res. 1982 Aug;40(1):73–88. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300018929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Uyenoyama M. K. Coevolution of the major histocompatibility complex and the t-complex in the mouse. I. Generation and maintenance of high complementarity associations. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):139–151. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Uyenoyama M. K. Coevolution of the major histocompatibility complex and the t-complex in the mouse. II. Modification of response to sharing of histocompatibility antigens. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):153–161. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Uyenoyama M. K. On the evolution of genetic incompatibility systems. III. Introduction of weak gametophytic self-incompatibility under partial inbreeding. Theor Popul Biol. 1988 Aug;34(1):47–91. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(88)90035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wright S. Systems of Mating. II. the Effects of Inbreeding on the Genetic Composition of a Population. Genetics. 1921 Mar;6(2):124–143. doi: 10.1093/genetics/6.2.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ziehe M., Roberds J. H. Inbreeding depression due to overdominance in partially self-fertilizing plant populations. Genetics. 1989 Apr;121(4):861–868. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.4.861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES