Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1978 Jun;26(3):681–685. doi: 10.1128/jvi.26.3.681-685.1978

Simian virus 40 DNA extracted from infected cells with sodium deoxycholate no longer reflects its in vivo superhelix density.

J E Germond
PMCID: PMC525892  PMID: 209214

Abstract

When simian virus 40 DNA is extracted from infected cells with low concentrations of sodium deoxycholate, which selectively extract non-encapsidated simian virus 40 DNA, the DNA has a lower average number of superhelical turns than the DNA extracted from purified viral particles. During extraction, a partial deproteinization of the DNA by a concentration of detergent that did not inactivate a nicking-closing activity led to the removal of some superhelical turns. The DNA extracted in this way no longer reflected its in vivo number of superhelical turns.

Full text

PDF
681

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bellard M., Oudet P., Germond J. E., Chambon P. Subunit structure of simian-virus-40 minichromosome. Eur J Biochem. 1976 Nov 15;70(2):543–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976.tb11046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bourgaux P., Bourgaux-Ramoisy D., Dulbecco R. The replication of the ring-shaped DNA of polyoma virus. I. Identification of the replicative intermediate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Oct;64(2):701–708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.64.2.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Champoux J. J., Dulbecco R. An activity from mammalian cells that untwists superhelical DNA--a possible swivel for DNA replication (polyoma-ethidium bromide-mouse-embryo cells-dye binding assay). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):143–146. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Champoux J. J. Strand breakage by the DNA untwisting enzyme results in covalent attachment of the enzyme to DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Sep;74(9):3800–3804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.9.3800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eason R., Vinograd J. Superhelix density heterogeneity of intracellular simian virus 40 deoxyribonucleic acid. J Virol. 1971 Jan;7(1):1–7. doi: 10.1128/jvi.7.1.1-7.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Germond J. E., Bellard M., Oudet P., Chambon P. Stability of nucleosomes in native and reconstituted chromatins. Nucleic Acids Res. 1976 Nov;3(11):3173–3192. doi: 10.1093/nar/3.11.3173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Germond J. E., Hirt B., Oudet P., Gross-Bellark M., Chambon P. Folding of the DNA double helix in chromatin-like structures from simian virus 40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 May;72(5):1843–1847. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.5.1843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smart J. E., Bonner J. Selective dissociation of histones from chromatin by sodium deoxycholate. J Mol Biol. 1971 Jun 28;58(3):651–659. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90030-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES