Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2011 May;77(9):3157–3159. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02115-10

Isolation of a Novel Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Serotype b Bacteriophage Capable of Lysing Bacteria within a Biofilm,

Mario Castillo-Ruiz 1, Enrique D Vinés 1, Camilo Montt 1, Jorge Fernández 2, José Manuel Delgado 3, Juan Carlos Hormazábal 4, Mauricio Bittner 1,5,*
PMCID: PMC3126385  PMID: 21378052

Abstract

A bacteriophage specific for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans serotype b, able to kill the bacterium within a biofilm, was isolated. Random mutagenesis of this phage rendered a bacteriophage able to kill 99% of the bacteria within a biofilm. This is the first report of a biocontrol experiment against A. actinomycetemcomitans.

INTRODUCTION

Periodontitis is an infection of the supporting tissues of the tooth caused by bacteria or bacterial groups embedded in a biofilm (14). Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (formerly, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans) is a capnophilic, nonmotile Gram-negative bacterium (11, 22) related to the aggressive form of periodontitis (610, 18, 23); its isolates are classified into seven serotypes, a to g (12, 24), with serotype b frequently associated with disease (2, 13, 20) and serotype c with oral health (19). Periodontitis caused by A. actinomycetemcomitans often requires antibiotic therapy besides mechanical treatment due to the bacterium's ability to form a biofilm in the periodontal pocket and on all mucous membrane surfaces in the oral cavity (6). Biofilms are organized in highly efficient and stable ecosystems (15), and it has been proposed that bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics is reduced within this structure (4), making it virtually impossible to completely remove bacteria from biofilms with antibiotics only (6). These features make periodontitis a complex disease and motivate the search for novel antimicrobial therapies such as oral microbiota modification and phage therapy (1, 16). Phage therapy has been attempted for systemic diseases (1) and to control infections in the oral cavity (17). Our aim was to isolate a bacteriophage for A. actinomycetemcomitans and evaluate its effectiveness on A. actinomycetemcomitans biofilms as a first evaluation of phage therapy for aggressive periodontitis.

Isolation of an A. actinomycetemcomitans bacteriophage.

The strains used in this work are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Seventeen clinical samples were obtained from saliva and wastewater from dental chair drainages. They were propagated by adding 2 ml of the sample to 20 ml of A. actinomycetemcomitans strain PAA005 at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.15 to 0.2. After 24 h of incubation at 37°C, supernatants were spot tested over lawns of PAA005 grown on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar. One sample generated a clearing zone; a bacteriophage was isolated from it by diluting and plating for isolated lysis plaques and designated Aabφ01. Phage Aabφ01 formed turbid plaques of about 0.5 to 1 mm in diameter (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material); this could be indicative of a temperate phage, which would not be surprising since they are commonly found for this bacterium (3, 10). To test for the host range, other bacteria were tested, including A. actinomycetemcomitans serotype c strains, and were not susceptible to Aabφ01, indicating that this phage has a restricted host range. To test if PAA005 has an inducible infectious viral particle in its genome, a culture of PAA005 was induced by UV light at 302 nm for 40 s (3), and the supernatant was tested as described above. No bacterial lysis was observed (data not shown), indicating that Aabφ01 was not a product of a lysogen induction.

Infection of A. actinomycetemcomitans by Aabφ01.

Infection of PAA005 liquid cultures at early exponential phase (OD600 of 0.1 to 0.2) with Aabφ01 caused the exponential phase to be interrupted at an OD600 of 0.5, the point at which a massive cell lysis, faster than the bacterial generation, started, causing a continuous decrease in the OD600 until a stable reading of 0.22, indicating that the phage did not kill the bacterial culture completely. To try and improve the lysis, we performed a mutagenesis on phage Aabφ01 by exposing a suspension of phage to UV light (260 nm) from a 15-W germicidal lamp at a dose rate corresponding to about 15 min (26). After UV treatment, serial dilutions were made from the lysate and spotted on the surface of a lawn of A. actinomycetemcomitans. Clear lysis plaques were selected and propagated, and one new lysate was chosen for further studies; it was designated Aabφ01-1. When a PAA005 culture at early exponential phase was infected with Aabφ01-1, the exponential phase reached an OD600 of 0.35, and we observed an improvement of the cell lysis with a decrease in the OD600 to 0.1.

Antimicrobial activity of phages Aabφ01 and Aabφ01-1 on an A. actinomycetemcomitans biofilm.

An A. actinomycetemcomitans biofilm was allowed to form on polystyrene flat-bottom 96-well plates (Cellstar Greiner Bio One, Germany) inoculated with 200 μl of a 1/100 dilution of a PAA005 overnight culture incubated in a capnophilic (CO2-rich) environment at 37°C. The biofilm present on each well was stained with 200 μl of a 0.01% crystal violet solution for 15 min and quantified by solubilizing the crystal violet with ethanol and measuring its absorbance at 595 nm (5, 21). Additionally a CFU count was performed by plating dilutions on BHI agar. To challenge this biofilm with phages, the culture medium was removed, and fresh culture medium containing phage at different multiplicities of infection (MOIs) was added. At 24 h postinfection, the CFU and the amount of biofilm were measured. Antimicrobial activity of phages on an A. actinomycetemcomitans biofilm was analyzed by comparing the CFU/ml of bacteria recovered from 24-h biofilms treated with the phage lysate at different MOIs and those recovered from untreated biofilm. The minimum necessary MOI to achieve the best decrease of the A. actinomycetemcomitans counts for the Aabφ01 phage was 0.1, while for the Aabφ01-1 phage, it was 0.01 (Fig. 1a). Interestingly, phages were not necessarily able to reduce the amount of biofilm, showing this ability only with the phage Aabφ01-1 at a high MOI (Fig. 1b). We characterized the cell viability within the biofilm by confocal microscopy. Biofilms formed on coverslips were treated with phages as described above and stained with Syto9 and propidium iodide (LIVE/DEAD BacLight bacterial viability kit L13152; Molecular Probes, Invitrogen), demonstrating that both bacteriophages were able to penetrate the biofilm and to produce the lysis of serotype b but not serotype c (Fig. 2). Furthermore, both phages were able to propagate in the infected biofilms (not shown).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Infection of an A. actinomycetemcomitans biofilm with phages Aabφ01 and Aabφ01-1. A biofilm of A. actinomycetemcomitans cultured during 24 h under capnophilic conditions was infected with Aabφ01 or Aabφ01-1 at different MOIs. The results are expressed as percentages of CFU/ml recovered 24 h postinfection compared with the CFU/ml recovered before infection (a) or from quantified biofilm at 595 nm (b). As a control, we used a biofilm of A. actinomycetemcomitans without infection (Aa). Bars depict the average values from three independent experiments. An asterisk represents significance in relation to the control (P < 0.05).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Confocal microscopy of a biofilm of A. actinomycetemcomitans after infection with Aabφ01 or Aabφ01-1. A biofilm of A. actinomycetemcomitans serotype b or serotype c cultured during 24 h under capnophilic conditions was infected with Aabφ01 or Aabφ01-1 and was stained with the LIVE/DEAD BacLight bacterial viability kit. As a control, we used an A. actinomycetemcomitans biofilm without infection. Green indicates live bacteria, and red indicates dead or dying bacteria.

Aabφ01 and Aabφ01-1 specifically infect A. actinomycetemcomitans; therefore, a possible clinical use of these phages would not affect the indigenous microbiota. In addition, they are highly selective in infection of serotype b but not serotype c. Serotype b is frequently associated with aggressive periodontitis (2, 13, 20), although differences in serotype distribution have been shown within the world population (10, 25), so the use of Aabφ01 and Aabφ01-1 against aggressive periodontitis, although possible, would not be universal. Despite this disadvantage, Aabφ01 could be used as a rapid laboratory method to distinguish between serotype b and serotype c.

Our findings constitute the first report of an in vitro evaluation of a phage for A. actinomycetemcomitans to develop a therapy against the microorganism within its biofilm. Our results, then, show the identification of a novel bacteriophage for A. actinomycetemcomitans with the ability to eliminate the bacteria within its biofilm, a promising result of our search for a therapy helpful for the elimination of bacteria resistant to antibiotics and bacteria present in infectious biofilms. More studies involving phage therapy in animals and humans are necessary to determine the effectiveness of this alternative against aggressive periodontitis. Our laboratory is currently working on a comprehensive characterization of both Aabφ01 and Aabφ01-1 to reach a better understanding of their potentials as biocontrol agents.

Supplementary Material

[Supplemental material]

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by FONDECYT grant 11060181, UNAB grant 48-09/R, UNAB grant DI 24-09/I, and predoctoral fellowships from CONICYT (MC-R). The founders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

We thank Leslie Daille for technical support with confocal-microscopy and Ignacio Fuentevilla for statistical analyses.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

Published ahead of print on 4 March 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Allaker R. P., Douglas C. W. 2009. Novel anti-microbial therapies for dental plaque-related diseases. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 33:8–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Asikainen S., Lai C. H., Alaluusua S., Slots J. 1991. Distribution of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotypes in periodontal health and disease. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 6:115–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Barretto Tinoco E. M., et al. 1997. Relationship of serotype, leukotoxin gene type and lysogeny in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to periodontal disease status. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 105:310–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bidault P., Chandad F., Grenier D. 2007. Systemic antibiotic therapy in the treatment of periodontitis. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 73:515–520 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Davey M. E. 2006. Techniques for the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilms. Periodontol. 2000 42:27–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Eick S., Seltmann T., Pfister W. 2004. Efficacy of antibiotics to strains of periodontopathogenic bacteria within a single species biofilm—an in vitro study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 31:376–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Fine D. H., Kaplan J. B., Kachlany S. C., Schreiner H. C. 2006. How we got attached to Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans: a model for infectious diseases. Periodontol. 2000 42:114–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fine D. H., et al. 2007. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and its relationship to initiation of localized aggressive periodontitis: longitudinal cohort study of initially healthy adolescents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:3859–3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hamlet S. M., et al. 2001. Distribution of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia in an Australian population. J. Clin. Periodontol. 28:1163–1171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Haubek D., et al. 1997. Racial tropism of a highly toxic clone of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans associated with juvenile periodontitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3037–3042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Isaza M. P., Duncan M. S., Kaplan J. B., Kachlany S. C. 2008. Screen for leukotoxin mutants in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans: genes of the phosphotransferase system are required for leukotoxin biosynthesis. Infect. Immun. 76:3561–3568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kaplan J. B., et al. 2001. Structural and genetic analyses of O polysaccharide from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotype f. Infect. Immun. 69:5375–5384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kawamoto D., et al. 2009. Genetic diversity and toxic activity of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans isolates. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 24:493–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kinane D., Bouchard P. 2008. Periodontal diseases and health: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J. Clin. Periodontol. 35:333–337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Langmark J., Storey M. V., Ashbolt N. J., Stenstrom T. A. 2005. Accumulation and fate of microorganisms and microspheres in biofilms formed in a pilot-scale water distribution system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:706–712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Machuca P., Daille L., Vines E., Berrocal L., Bittner M. 2010. Isolation of a novel bacteriophage specific for the periodontal pathogen Fusobacterium nucleatum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:7243–7250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Paisano A. F., Spira B., Cai S., Bombana A. C. 2004. In vitro antimicrobial effect of bacteriophages on human dentin infected with Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 19:327–330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Resch G., Kulik E. M., Dietrich F. S., Meyer J. 2004. Complete genomic nucleotide sequence of the temperate bacteriophage Aa Phi 23 of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J. Bacteriol. 186:5523–5528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Rylev M., Kilian M. 2008. Prevalence and distribution of principal periodontal pathogens worldwide. J. Clin. Periodontol. 35:346–361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Saarela M., et al. 1992. Frequency and stability of mono- or poly-infection by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotypes a, b, c, d or e. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 7:277–279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sedlacek M. J., Walker C. 2007. Antibiotic resistance in an in vitro subgingival biofilm model. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 22:333–339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Slots J., Ting M. 1999. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal disease: occurrence and treatment. Periodontol. 2000 20:82–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Suda R., et al. 2003. Determination of eight selected periodontal pathogens in the subgingival plaque of maxillary first molars in Japanese school children aged 8–11 years. J. Periodontal. Res. 38:28–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Takada K., et al. 2010. Characterization of a new serotype g isolate of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 25:200–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Teixeira R. E., et al. 2006. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotype-specific genotypes and periodontal status in Brazilian subjects. Can. J. Microbiol. 52:182–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tessman I. 1985. UV-induced mutagenesis of phage S13 can occur in the absence of the RecA and UmuC proteins of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82:6614–6618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Supplemental material]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES