Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2009 Jan 14;65(Pt 2):o297. doi: 10.1107/S160053680804405X

(2S)-1,1-Dichloro-2-(2-chloro­phen­yl)-2-(4-chloro­phen­yl)ethane

Tatiana Cantillana a, Lars Eriksson b,*
PMCID: PMC2968283  PMID: 21581907

Abstract

The title compound, C14H10Cl4, is easily crystallized while the other enanti­omorph only forms an oil upon crystallization attempts. The title compound has a considerably higher density, ρ ≃ 1.562 Mg m−3 compared to the racemic substance, ρ ≃ 1.514 Mg m−3. This is supported by the fact there are two inter­molecular halogen–halogen contacts in the title compound compared with only one the racemic compound. The dihedral angle between the two phenyl rings is 76.83 (5)°

Related literature

For related literature regarding the structure of the racemic compound, see: Arora & Bates (1976). For related literature on the toxicological effects, see: Allolio & Fassnacht (2006), Benecke et al. (1991), Bergenstal et al. (1960); Canti­llana et al. (2009).graphic file with name e-65-0o297-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C14H10Cl4

  • M r = 320.02

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.13530 (10) Å

  • b = 12.0715 (2) Å

  • c = 9.4525 (2) Å

  • β = 103.5490 (18)°

  • V = 680.59 (2) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.85 mm−1

  • T = 100 (2) K

  • 0.34 × 0.24 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur-3 κ-diffractometer with Sapphire-III CCD

  • Absorption correction: gaussian (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008) T min = 0.814, T max = 0.968

  • 18569 measured reflections

  • 4258 independent reflections

  • 3935 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.032

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.026

  • wR(F 2) = 0.060

  • S = 1.01

  • 4258 reflections

  • 164 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3

  • Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1755 Friedel pairs

  • Flack parameter: 0.00 (4)

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Bergerhoff, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2003) and SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680804405X/bq2116sup1.cif

e-65-0o297-sup1.cif (17KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680804405X/bq2116Isup2.hkl

e-65-0o297-Isup2.hkl (208.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected interatomic distances (Å).

Cl1⋯Cl4i 3.4370 (5)
Cl2⋯Cl3ii 3.4888 (5)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council and by the Faculty of Natural Sciences at Stockholm University.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound is commercially available as a racemate which has been structurally characterized earlier (Arora & Bates, 1976). When purifying and separating the two enantiomers of the racemate, one of the enantiomers, the title compound easily formed crystals while the other enantiomer only formed an oil upon crystallization attempts. A salient feature of the racemic compound o,p'-DDD (Mitotane) is its selective toxicity to the adrenal cortex. It has been used for 40 years for treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) (Bergenstal et al., 1960) and Cushing's syndrome (Benecke et al., 1991). The efficacy and potency is however low, and o,p'-DDD treatment is frequently associated with severe side effects (Allolio & Fassnacht, 2006). The differences in toxicity of the two enantiomers of o,p'-DDD and the pharmacokinetics connected with these two compounds has recently been examined in Göttingen mini pigs and will be reported elsewhere (Cantillana et al., 2009).

The crystal structure of (I) shown in Fig. 1 show normal bond distances and angles. The dihedral angle between the two phenyl rings is 76.83 (5)°. Both phenyl rings are planar within 0.01 Å with the Cl3 deviating 0.103 (2) Å from the least square plane calculated from C3→C8 and the Cl4 deviating 0.048 (2) from the least square plane of C9→C14. All four chlorines are involved in the intermolecular Cl···Cl contacts between the different molecules building up a corrugated layer extending in the [010] and [101] directions. The title compound has a considerably higher density, ρ≈ 1.562 g/cm3 compared to the racemate, ρ≈ 1.514 g/cm3 (Arora & Bates, 1976). A tentative model for the higher density of the pure enantiomer is that it may be a result of the more numerous intermolecular short halogen-halogen contacts.

Experimental

The title compound was purified from a racemic mixture present in the commercially available product, 1,1-Dichloro-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethane (o,p'-DDD) using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Shimadzu LC-9 A (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an UV detector, UV100 from Spectra-Physics (Fremont, USA) and a permethylated γ-cyclodextrin column, Nucleodex gamma-PM (250 x 10 mm, 5µm, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co, Düren, Germany). The detection wavelength was 240 nm and the flow rate was 4 ml/min and injection volume of 200µl. The mobile phase was methanol:water (80:20) and 1% triethylamine:acetic acid (1:2 v/v). Thin plate-like crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained upon recrystallization from methanol.

Refinement

The hydrogen atoms were geometrically positioned at C—H distances of 0.95 and 1.00 Å for the aromatic and methine hydrogen's. Both types of hydrogen's were given U(iso) = 1.2Ueq(C). The completeness of the data increases to 0.994 if one cuts the reflection data at 2θ = 50°.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The title compound (I) with displacement ellipsoids at 50% probability with the unique atoms labeled.

Crystal data

C14H10Cl4 F(000) = 324
Mr = 320.02 Dx = 1.562 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2yb Cell parameters from 11963 reflections
a = 6.1353 (1) Å θ = 3.8–32.1°
b = 12.0715 (2) Å µ = 0.85 mm1
c = 9.4525 (2) Å T = 100 K
β = 103.5490 (18)° Plate, colourless
V = 680.59 (2) Å3 0.34 × 0.24 × 0.04 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur-3 κ-diffractometer with Sapphire-III CCD 4258 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source 3935 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.032
Detector resolution: 16.54 pixels mm-1 θmax = 32.2°, θmin = 3.8°
ω scans at different φ h = −9→9
Absorption correction: gaussian (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008) k = −17→15
Tmin = 0.814, Tmax = 0.968 l = −13→14
18569 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0358P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.060 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.01 Δρmax = 0.40 e Å3
4258 reflections Δρmin = −0.31 e Å3
164 parameters Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraint Extinction coefficient: 0.009 (2)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 1755 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map Flack parameter: 0.00 (4)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.5723 (2) 0.58327 (13) 0.35281 (15) 0.0153 (3)
H1 0.4179 0.5513 0.3360 0.018*
C2 0.5682 (2) 0.70231 (12) 0.40708 (16) 0.0136 (3)
H2 0.7233 0.7330 0.4219 0.016*
Cl1 0.75951 (6) 0.50047 (3) 0.48348 (4) 0.02031 (8)
Cl2 0.66068 (6) 0.58092 (3) 0.18581 (4) 0.02172 (9)
C3 0.4118 (2) 0.77539 (12) 0.29597 (15) 0.0143 (3)
C4 0.4896 (3) 0.87540 (13) 0.25332 (16) 0.0178 (3)
H4 0.6434 0.8943 0.2871 0.021*
C5 0.3459 (3) 0.94815 (14) 0.16209 (16) 0.0196 (3)
H5 0.4006 1.0162 0.1335 0.024*
C6 0.1222 (3) 0.92006 (14) 0.11361 (15) 0.0174 (3)
C7 0.0412 (3) 0.81928 (14) 0.15077 (17) 0.0197 (3)
H7 −0.1116 0.7996 0.1141 0.024*
C8 0.1859 (2) 0.74824 (14) 0.24185 (17) 0.0185 (3)
H8 0.1310 0.6796 0.2683 0.022*
Cl3 −0.06289 (6) 1.01373 (3) 0.00690 (4) 0.02230 (9)
C9 0.5012 (2) 0.70772 (12) 0.55256 (16) 0.0149 (3)
C10 0.3199 (3) 0.64714 (13) 0.57858 (16) 0.0177 (3)
H10 0.2424 0.5974 0.5062 0.021*
C11 0.2503 (3) 0.65801 (14) 0.70765 (17) 0.0192 (3)
H11 0.1263 0.6162 0.7223 0.023*
C12 0.3609 (3) 0.72933 (15) 0.81459 (17) 0.0212 (3)
H12 0.3129 0.7366 0.9026 0.025*
C13 0.5417 (3) 0.79019 (14) 0.79373 (17) 0.0207 (3)
H13 0.6192 0.8389 0.8674 0.025*
C14 0.6088 (2) 0.77922 (13) 0.66334 (16) 0.0157 (3)
Cl4 0.83309 (6) 0.86142 (3) 0.64058 (4) 0.02012 (8)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0144 (6) 0.0158 (7) 0.0172 (6) 0.0000 (5) 0.0071 (5) −0.0006 (6)
C2 0.0121 (6) 0.0131 (7) 0.0159 (6) −0.0025 (5) 0.0041 (5) −0.0019 (5)
Cl1 0.01984 (16) 0.01761 (17) 0.02400 (17) 0.00417 (14) 0.00622 (12) 0.00057 (14)
Cl2 0.02671 (18) 0.02192 (19) 0.02051 (16) −0.00424 (15) 0.01356 (14) −0.00507 (14)
C3 0.0158 (6) 0.0140 (7) 0.0139 (6) −0.0016 (5) 0.0054 (5) −0.0012 (5)
C4 0.0171 (6) 0.0189 (8) 0.0175 (6) −0.0054 (6) 0.0042 (5) −0.0007 (6)
C5 0.0261 (8) 0.0167 (7) 0.0162 (7) −0.0061 (6) 0.0054 (6) 0.0018 (5)
C6 0.0210 (7) 0.0189 (7) 0.0129 (6) 0.0025 (6) 0.0052 (5) 0.0020 (5)
C7 0.0173 (7) 0.0212 (8) 0.0202 (7) −0.0024 (6) 0.0039 (6) 0.0019 (6)
C8 0.0171 (7) 0.0174 (7) 0.0206 (7) −0.0043 (6) 0.0037 (5) 0.0021 (6)
Cl3 0.02784 (18) 0.02156 (19) 0.01717 (15) 0.00582 (15) 0.00459 (13) 0.00309 (14)
C9 0.0156 (6) 0.0138 (7) 0.0154 (6) 0.0041 (5) 0.0034 (5) 0.0005 (5)
C10 0.0205 (7) 0.0166 (7) 0.0172 (6) 0.0015 (6) 0.0070 (5) 0.0021 (6)
C11 0.0186 (7) 0.0203 (8) 0.0205 (7) 0.0034 (6) 0.0081 (6) 0.0048 (6)
C12 0.0263 (8) 0.0224 (8) 0.0163 (7) 0.0089 (7) 0.0077 (6) 0.0029 (6)
C13 0.0258 (8) 0.0189 (8) 0.0158 (7) 0.0070 (6) 0.0020 (6) −0.0012 (6)
C14 0.0146 (6) 0.0126 (7) 0.0185 (6) 0.0029 (5) 0.0013 (5) −0.0002 (5)
Cl4 0.01702 (16) 0.01679 (17) 0.02510 (18) −0.00235 (13) 0.00201 (13) −0.00440 (14)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—C2 1.528 (2) C7—C8 1.381 (2)
C1—Cl1 1.7831 (15) C7—H7 0.9500
C1—Cl2 1.7855 (14) C8—H8 0.9500
C1—H1 1.0000 C9—C14 1.398 (2)
C2—C9 1.526 (2) C9—C10 1.400 (2)
C2—C3 1.526 (2) C10—C11 1.390 (2)
C2—H2 1.0000 C10—H10 0.9500
C3—C4 1.392 (2) C11—C12 1.379 (2)
C3—C8 1.399 (2) C11—H11 0.9500
C4—C5 1.391 (2) C12—C13 1.382 (2)
C4—H4 0.9500 C12—H12 0.9500
C5—C6 1.383 (2) C13—C14 1.394 (2)
C5—H5 0.9500 C13—H13 0.9500
C6—C7 1.390 (2) C14—Cl4 1.7503 (16)
C6—Cl3 1.7462 (16)
Cl1···Cl4i 3.4370 (5) Cl2···Cl3ii 3.4888 (5)
C2—C1—Cl1 110.68 (10) C8—C7—C6 119.01 (14)
C2—C1—Cl2 110.12 (10) C8—C7—H7 120.5
Cl1—C1—Cl2 108.88 (8) C6—C7—H7 120.5
C2—C1—H1 109.0 C7—C8—C3 121.31 (14)
Cl1—C1—H1 109.0 C7—C8—H8 119.3
Cl2—C1—H1 109.0 C3—C8—H8 119.3
C9—C2—C3 109.67 (11) C14—C9—C10 116.49 (13)
C9—C2—C1 111.82 (12) C14—C9—C2 121.46 (13)
C3—C2—C1 111.69 (12) C10—C9—C2 121.92 (13)
C9—C2—H2 107.8 C11—C10—C9 121.65 (15)
C3—C2—H2 107.8 C11—C10—H10 119.2
C1—C2—H2 107.8 C9—C10—H10 119.2
C4—C3—C8 118.35 (14) C12—C11—C10 120.19 (15)
C4—C3—C2 119.83 (13) C12—C11—H11 119.9
C8—C3—C2 121.69 (13) C10—C11—H11 119.9
C5—C4—C3 121.07 (14) C11—C12—C13 120.04 (14)
C5—C4—H4 119.5 C11—C12—H12 120.0
C3—C4—H4 119.5 C13—C12—H12 120.0
C6—C5—C4 119.09 (15) C12—C13—C14 119.25 (15)
C6—C5—H5 120.5 C12—C13—H13 120.4
C4—C5—H5 120.5 C14—C13—H13 120.4
C5—C6—C7 121.11 (15) C13—C14—C9 122.37 (15)
C5—C6—Cl3 119.54 (13) C13—C14—Cl4 117.29 (12)
C7—C6—Cl3 119.33 (12) C9—C14—Cl4 120.33 (12)
Cl1—C1—C2—C9 −57.58 (13) C2—C3—C8—C7 174.53 (14)
Cl2—C1—C2—C9 −178.02 (9) C3—C2—C9—C14 −96.67 (15)
Cl1—C1—C2—C3 179.08 (9) C1—C2—C9—C14 138.85 (14)
Cl2—C1—C2—C3 58.64 (13) C3—C2—C9—C10 78.99 (17)
C9—C2—C3—C4 107.05 (15) C1—C2—C9—C10 −45.48 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C4 −128.40 (14) C14—C9—C10—C11 0.2 (2)
C9—C2—C3—C8 −68.77 (17) C2—C9—C10—C11 −175.63 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C8 55.78 (18) C9—C10—C11—C12 −0.3 (2)
C8—C3—C4—C5 1.6 (2) C10—C11—C12—C13 −0.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −174.36 (14) C11—C12—C13—C14 0.6 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6 0.1 (2) C12—C13—C14—C9 −0.7 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C7 −2.1 (2) C12—C13—C14—Cl4 178.08 (12)
C4—C5—C6—Cl3 176.66 (12) C10—C9—C14—C13 0.3 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C8 2.3 (2) C2—C9—C14—C13 176.15 (14)
Cl3—C6—C7—C8 −176.42 (12) C10—C9—C14—Cl4 −178.44 (11)
C6—C7—C8—C3 −0.6 (2) C2—C9—C14—Cl4 −2.55 (19)
C4—C3—C8—C7 −1.3 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, y−1/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BQ2116).

References

  1. Allolio, B. & Fassnacht, M. (2006). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.91, 2027–2037. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Arora, S. K. & Bates, R. B. (1976). J. Org. Chem.41, 554–556. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Benecke, R., Keller, E., Vetter, B. & de Zeeuw, R. A. (1991). Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.41, 259–261. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Bergenstal, D. M., Hertz, R., Lipsett, M. B. & Moy, R. H. (1960). Ann. Intern. Med.53, 672–682.
  5. Bergerhoff, G. (1996). DIAMOND Gerhard-Domagk Strasse 1, D-53121 Bonn, Germany.
  6. Cantillana, T., Lindström, V., Eriksson, L., Brandt, I. & Bergman, Å. (2009). In preparation. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.
  8. Oxford Diffraction. (2008). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England.
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst.36, 7–13.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680804405X/bq2116sup1.cif

e-65-0o297-sup1.cif (17KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680804405X/bq2116Isup2.hkl

e-65-0o297-Isup2.hkl (208.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES