Skip to main content
Current Cardiology Reviews logoLink to Current Cardiology Reviews
. 2010 Aug;6(3):138–149. doi: 10.2174/157340310791658785

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Cerebral Ischemia and Ischemic Heart Diseases: Similarities and Differences

Ernest Palomeras Soler 1,*, Virgina Casado Ruiz 1
PMCID: PMC2994106  PMID: 21804773

Abstract

Cerebral ischemia and ischemic heart diseases, common entities nowadays, are the main manifestation of circulatory diseases. Cardiovascular diseases, followed by stroke, represent the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Both entities share risk factors, pathophisiology and etiologic aspects by means of a main common mechanism, atherosclerosis. However, each entity has its own particularities. Ischemic stroke shows a variety of pathogenic mechanisms not present in ischemic heart disease. An ischemic stroke increases the risk of suffering a coronary heart disease, and viceversa. The aim of this chapter is to review data on epidemiology, pathophisiology and risk factors for both entities, considering the differences and similarities that could be found in between them. We discuss traditional risk factors, obtained from epidemiological data, and also some novel ones, such as hyperhomocisteinemia or sleep apnea. We separate risk factors, as clasically, in two groups: nonmodifiables, which includes age, sex, or ethnicity, and modifiables, including hypertension, dyslipidemia or diabetis, in order to discuss the role of each factor in both ischemic events, ischemic stroke and coronary heart disease.

Keywords: Coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, epidemiology, risk factors.

1. BACKGROUND

Ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke are common entities that share in many cases a similar pathophysiology, based on arteriosclerosis. Usually, arteriosclerosis affects the patient widespread, so he becomes at risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) the same as for acute stroke. In both cases, a sudden change of circulation occurs, with resultant decreased blood supply to part of the heart or brain. Stroke, ocasionally, has been considered to be like a "heart attack" in the brain. Therefore it is clear that ACS and acute stroke share data on epidemiology, risk and etiological factors, and on therapeutic measures. Moreover, some studies have demonstrated that coronary artery disease is frequent among stroke patients, and also that chronic coronary artery disease also increases the risk of suffer a stroke [1-4].

However, heart and brain are two different organs in their anatomy, physiology and location, with their own circulation peculiarities. This fact explains that we find differences in risk factors, some being more likely to lead to an ACS than to a stroke, and viceversa. There are also notable differences in the etiology, much more diverse in stroke than in the ACS, and, consequently, in treatment.

In this chapter we discuss the epidemiology and the risk factors for both diseases, analyzing their similarities and differences.

2. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Cardiovascular system diseases represent the leading cause of death worldwide, although the mortality for this cause is falling gradually due to advances in diagnosis and therapy. According to World Health Organization (WHO) data, in 2008, the mortality rate due to these diseases was 214-455 deaths per 100,000, being lower in developed countries [5].

If we look into the European Community, cardiovascular system diseases are also the leading cause of death in adulthood [6,7]. In 2005 the death rate from circulatory system diseases was 241.2 per 100,000 (295.4 in males, 196 in females). This rate decreased to 226.1 (273 and 183, respectively) the following year [8].

In Spain, there were 385,361 deaths in 2007. Analyzing the major groups of diseases, cardiovascular disease ranks first as cause of death in the year 2007, accounting for 32.2% of all deaths. For specific causes, ischemic heart diseases were the leading cause (37,222 deaths) and cerebrovascular disease the second (33,034 deaths) [9]. In Catalonia, also in 2007, cardiovascular diseases were the second leading cause of death in men younger than 85 years (after the tumors) and the first in men older than that age; in women, there were the first cause after 75 years old [7].

All these data give a clear idea of the extent and severity of these diseases. However, there are some differences in between the epidemiology of ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, which are outlined in the following paragraphs.

2.1. Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease

As discussed, coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in adulthood, accounting for 9.6% of deaths from specific causes. In Spain, in 2007, it was the leading cause of death among men (21.248, 10.6%) and the second leading cause of death among women (15.974, 8.7%) [9]. In the European Community, ischemic heart disease caused 89.1 deaths per 100,000 in 2006 (123.2 in males, 62.4 for females) [6].

The incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) varies according to the study and it varies also according to the different age and sex groups. The WHO MONICA project, where data of 37 populations were collected during a 10-year period, showed mean incidence of CHD events of 434 per 100.000 men-year [10]. Finland and United Kingdom (Belfast and Glasgow) had the highest rates (more than 700 per 100.000) and the lowest were in China (81 per 100.000) and Catalonia (210 per 100.000). In the same project, annual rates were quite lower in women: mean incidence rate was 103 events per 100.000 women-year. Incidence was higher in United Kingdom populations (188 and 265 per 100.000) and lower in China, Catalonia (35 per 100.000) and Toulouse (36 per 100.000).

Several epidemiological studies in the U.S. have placed the incidence between 200 and 300 cases per 100.000 [11-17], being clearly higher in males (up to 486 cases per 100.000). This gender difference, which is found in all studies, appears to be more evident in younger ages of life, while at older ages tends to equalize.

As discussed below, and unlike what happens with stroke, the incidence of ACS is highest in the 5th and 6th decade of life, to decrease later on [18].

The incidence of ACS follows a circadian rhythm, with a peak from 6:00 to noon when more than 1/3 of ACS occur, and a three-fold increase in the frequency of onset of MI at peak (9 am) as compared with trough (11 pm) periods [19,20]. In the study of Goldberg et al. [21], 23% of patients reported onset of symptoms within 1 hour after awakening.

2.2. Epidemiology of Stroke

Cerebrovascular diseases are the second leading cause of death, also the second leading cause of dementia, and the leading cause of disability. By sex, they are the third leading cause of death in men, after ischemic heart disease and lung cancer, whereas in women they are the primary cause (18.964 female deaths from this cause in Spain in 2007, representing 10.2% of all deaths) [9]. In Catalonia, stroke causes 9.2% of overall mortality, 7.5% in males and 11.1% in women. The stroke mortality rates are clearly higher in non-industrialized countries [5].

The incidence of stroke varies widely depending on the study. The WHO places the global incidence of stroke at around 200 cases per 100.000 inhabitants [22], although data vary among countries. In a review of population-based studies since 1990, incidence varied from 130 to 410 cases per 100.000 person-years [23]. Highest rate was in Japan and lowest in United Kingdom, Germany and New Zealand. In the same review, the age-specific incidence of stroke increased progressively, and the range of stroke incidence in people aged 55 years or more was 420-650 per 100.000, except in Japan, Russia and Ukraine, where rates were higher. When difference by gender was analyzed, the incidence resulted higher in males in all studies.

Stroke, the same as myocardial infarction, also follows a circadian rhythm, and very similar to ischemic heart disease. To estimate the start time of the stroke is not easy, given that nearly a quarter of strokes occur during sleep [24]. Even taking this into account, a peak incidence has been observed between 6 am and 12 noon, when the 55% of ischemic strokes occur [25].

3. RISK FACTORS

An ischemic injury is a common mechanism for ischemic stroke (IS) and also for CHD. We find, logically, that many of the documented risk factors are present in both conditions, even if their contribution to the pathological event may be different. This fact is reviewed by Donnan et al. [26], who noted that identifiable risk factors explained 90% of CHD but only 60% of IS. Recently, an interesting paper has been published about this issue, in order to contrast risk factors pattern for each disease. It is a prospective cohort study conducted in Australia, on 2805 men and women, older than 60, over a 16 year follow-up period, where the authors identify factors which predict similarly IS and CHD, while other factors predict only one of each condition [27].

It has to be noted that, since CHD and IS share many risk factors and aspects of pathophysiology, to suffer IS and/or CHD will involve a risk of a new ischemic event. In patients with a history of CHD, the risk of repeating a new ACS is much higher than the risk of IS; and in individuals with a history of IS, the risk of recurrent stroke is higher than the risk of ACS [27]. However, stroke is a major complication associated with high mortality in patients with CHD, especially when hypertension is also associated [28]. On the other hand, the risk of CHD in patients with a history of IS or TIA is moderately high [2]. A necropsy study of patients with fatal stroke found atherosclerotic plaques in the coronary arteries in 72.4% of patients, stenosis greater than 50% in 37.5 % of them and myocardial infarction in 40.8% of the cases. These figures were roughly three times higher than what found in patients with other non-vascular neurological diseases [29].

Pathophysiology of ischemic cardiopathy and stroke have some similarities but also some differences. Both share atherothrombosis as an etiological factor, but the frequency with which this is the major mechanism of ischemia varies in each case. Thus, rupture or erosion of vulnerable plaques in coronary arteries “causing” severe stenosis or occlusion are the commonest cause of MI [30,31], while coronary spasm, emboli or dissection are less frequent etiologies, accounting for only 5-15% of acute MI. A similar proportion of patients have angiographically normal coronary arteries [32-35]. In the case of stroke a wide variety of etiologies may be found. In fact, stroke is not a simple disease but the manifestation of several diseases with different pathophysiology. There are ischemic strokes and hemorrhagic strokes, whith a different mechanism while sharing some risk factors. In this article we will only refer to IS, which itself has a heterogeneous etiology and pathophysiology.

TOAST classification [36] defines 5 types: large artery disease (atherothrombotic), cardioembolism, small vessel disease, non-habitual and cryptogenic. Frequency of atherotrombotic stroke is only 15-48% (much less than in CHD), a cardioembolic source is found in 21-37% cases, small-vessel disease is present in 10-34% and etiology is not found in as many as the 38% cases [37-42]. Given this greater variety of etiologies risk factors for the different subtypes of stroke will also vary, with each risk factor playing a different role in each subtype of stroke considered. Hereafter, the importance of different risk factors for both ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke will be discussed.

Vascular risk factors are usually divided into modifiable and non-modifiable. In this article we employ the same classification to review each factor, considering their role in cerebral and cardiovascular disease. These factors, together with a qualitative assessment of its influence in both patologies, based on its prevalence and its relevance, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Vascular Risk Factors: Relevance in Ischemic Cardiopathy and Ischemic Stroke

Ischemic Cardiopathy Ischemic Stroke
Non-modifiable:
• Age +++ (50-70 y.) +++ (older)
• Sex ++ (male) ++ (male)
• Ethnicity + +
• Genetics-heredity ++ ++
• Uncommon related factors + +
Modifiable:
• High blood pressure +++ +++
• Diabetes +++ ++ (aterothrombotic-lacunar)
• Dyslipidemia +++ ++ (aterothrombotic-lacunar)
• Smoking +++ +++
• Alcohol + (dual relationship) + (dual relationship)
• Obesity +++ ++
• Physical inactivity ++ ++
• Diet ++ ++
• Atrial fibrillation and other sources of embolism + ++ (cardioembolic)
• Other risk factors:
-Hyperhomocysteinemia ++ ++
-Hypercoagulability + +
-Lipoproteins ++ +
-Inflammatory markers + +
-Obstructive sleep-apnea syndrome ++ ++

3.1. Non-Modifiable Risk Factors

3.1.1. Age

Age is the strongest determinant of stroke, which is less common before 40 years old. According to data obtained from Framingham study, incidence of stroke increased steeply with age, becoming double in each successive decade from 55 years old on [43]. Hence, prevalence of stroke for individuals older than 80 years is approximately 27% compared with 13% for individuals 60-79 years of age [44]. The Framingham stroke risk profile (FSRP), developed decades ago, is still a useful tool to estimate, according to age, the specific 10 years probability of stroke by using clinical information, although conclusions should be drawn with caution. For instance, according to FSRP, the 10 years probability of stroke results 3% in a 60 years old man but 9,7% in men older than 84, independently of other risk factors [45].

In the case of CHD, age is also, by far, one of the most powerful risk factors. The highest incidence of ACS is found in younger patients than stroke, around the 5th and 6th decades of life [18, 46]. Even though, a quarter of ACS patients are younger than 55 years, and a similar proportion are older than 75. An observational study conducted in Spain showed that 36% of patients were younger than 45 years old [46].

3.1.2. Sex

MI, the same as IS, is clearly more frequent among men. In Dubbo Study, male gender predicted similarly CHD and IS [27].

A recent meta-analysis [47] showed that stroke is 33% more incident in men than in women. This fact is also observed in the FSRP, mentioned above. However, due to longer life expectancy and much higher incidence of stroke in older ages, women suffer more strokes than men [48]. Etiology and risk factors of stroke are not the same in men than in women: cardioembolism is the main cause of stroke in women, whereas large and small vessel disease is the main cause among men [49]. Women use to suffer stroke earlier than men and their risk factors’ profile is different [50]. Turtzo et al. [51], when reviewing these different characteristics, point that more women than men die from stroke and that, in women, there is a trend for increased stroke severity, for a recurrent stroke after 5 years, and for a poorer functional outcome after IS.

Regarding CHD, its prevalence is also higher among men. The proportion of males rounds 64-71% in different series. This percentage increases in younger people and it tends to equalize when growing old [18, 52-54]. The most common found manifestation of CHD in women is angina pectoris, while in men is myocardial infarction [55].

3.1.3. Ethnicity

Stroke incidence is greater among black patients, approximately double than among white patients according to several studies. The study conducted in Manhattan by Sacco et al. [56] found that stroke incidence among black patients was 2.4 times that of white patients, and that among Hispanic patients it was 1.6 times that of white patients.

Different causes and mechanisms for stroke have been found to be more common in different race-ethnic groups, for example: hemorrhagic stroke –usually related to HBP- and young adults arteriopathy in Japan, extracranial atherosclerosis lesions in white patients vs. intracranial lesions in black, Hispanic and Asian patients. The reasons for that are still unclear. In the case of Africans an increased risk of ischemic stroke has been described related to sickle cell trait, but there is insufficient evidence to suggest an independent association [57].

The same as stroke, ischemic heart diseases may differ across ethnics groups. In the case of Hispanics, they have excessive rates of diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome, being particularly vulnerable to heart failure [58]. South Asian immigrants in the United States also have a higher risk for CHD, compared to Caucasians, and a higher prevalence of modifiable risk factors like diabetes or dyslipidemia. Nevertheless, the presence of risk factors may not be the only explanation for a high risk of ischemic events in this population, and new factors as dysfunctional HDL have been reported to play a role [59].

3.1.4. Genetics-Heredity

Stroke incidence increases when there is a family history of stroke. The same occurs with CHD disease incidence, as observed in The Framingham Study: a family history of ischemic heart disease in first degree relatives younger than 55 implies a relative risk of 1,5-1,7, independently to other risk factors [44]. These facts could be due to a familial association existing with other risk factors for the disease (cholesterol, hiperfibrinogenemia, HBP, diabetes…..), or due to independent factors, such as the controversially investigated adrenergic receptor gene. Rexrode et al. [60] did not find association between the adrenergic receptor genetic variation studied and the risk of cardiovascular disease –MI or IS- in women. A recent study by Schurks et al. [61] suggested that the Haplotype Gly16-Gln27-Thr164 polymorphism in the beta2-adrenergic receptor which had previously shown a protective effect on MI in men, is also associated with reduced risk of MI in Caucasian women, but not with an IS risk reduction.

Previously, an increased risk for both CHD and IS had been demonstrated in carriers of e4 allele for Apolipoproteine E. In young patients, several hereditary arteriopathies might be found to be the cause of ischemic stroke, such as CADASIL, CARASIL, Sneddon syndrome, mitocondrial cytopathies, Fabry disease or different coagulopathies. All of them are rare in the case of stroke, and even rarer as a cause of CHD.

3.1.5. Uncommon Related Factors

Many other factors have been said to affect the epidemiology of IS and/or CHD, although mechanisms are not well clarified and data are still lacking about it. Just to mention,

-Size: it has been said to be inversely associated with the long-term incidence of fatal stroke; in contrast, height is not significantly related with mortality due to CHD mortality [62].

-Body fat distribution: it predicts long term stroke mortality and also long term heart disease mortality in middle-aged men [63].

-Year station: a higher incidence of IS and of acute MI has been described related to changes –descent- in atmospheric pressure [64] and during winter [65].

3.2. Modifiable Risk Factors

In this section we discuss modifiable, or treatable, risk factors for CHD and IS such as living habits, some atherogenic personal attributes (HBP, DM, DLP, obesity…) and certain diseases, which predispose to the occurrence of an ischemic event. Identified modifiable risk factors are responsible for 90% of myocardial infarction [66] while they explain only about 60% of strokes [26].

These risk factors may have changed over the last years, as observed in the Lausanne Stroke Registry [67] where an increasing proportion of hypercholesterolemia but a decreasing proportion of high blood pressure, smoking habit and diabetes mellitus in patients were described over time.

3.2.1. High Blood Pressure

High blood pressure (HBP) or hypertension affects nearly 30% of the world’s population. It is a risk factor for stroke, CHD, chronic heart failure, kidney failure, vascular dementia and, in general, for all cardiovascular diseases. According to WHO data, 62% of all strokes and 49% of CHD are attributable to HBP.

The Framingham Heart Study [68] showed an increased relative risk (RR) of cardiovascular disease of 2, in patients with blood pressure 130-139/ 85-89 compared with patients with blood pressure lower than 120/80. The risk of CHD and stroke increases linearly when blood pressure is higher than 115/75. Mortality due to IS and to MI also increases linearly and progressively when blood pressure is above 115/75, being double for every 20mm Hg systolic or 10mm Hg diastolic increase in blood pressure [69].

Blood Pressure and Stroke

HBP is the most important modifiable risk factor for a stroke of any type, ischemic or hemorrhagic, and also for transient ischemic attack. HBP accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis, one of the main predictors of ischemic stroke. In Framingham Study, most hypertension related strokes were due to atherothrombotic brain infarction. Thus, hypertension is a main risk factor not only for hemorraghic stroke but also, and at a similar extent, it is a main risk factor for IS [70]. Systolic, diastolic or both blood pressure values can contribute to the occurrence of stroke when they are high. In large-scale prospective cohort studies it has been observed that relative elevations of blood pressure, often undervalued by patient and doctors, may also increase the risk: 140-160/90-94 increases the risk of stroke by 1.5, >160/95 increases the risk by 3-4. Decreasing blood pressure, even if modestly, may achieve 40% risk reduction of stroke, as described in prospective clinical assays [71,72].

When analyzing series of patients affected of ischemic stroke, HBP is found in 53-68% of patients [37-39]. The contribution of HBP to the occurrence of each different subtype of stroke is not the same, as reported in these series. In the Athens Stroke Registry [39], HBP is present in 80% of lacunar infarcts, in 73% of atherothrombotic, in 62% of cardioembolic, and in 62% of cryptogenic strokes. The Barcelona Stroke Registry [38] showed a predominant role of HBP in lacunar infarction, as well (76%).

A recent meta-analysis [73] showed the relation between higher diet salt intake and greater incidence of stroke (1.23 relative risk). In the Dubbo study [27] HBP appears to be a stronger predictor of IS, compared to CHD.

Blood Pressure and CHD

HBP is one of the main risk factors for CHD. According to the GRACE score, systolic blood pressure is the modifiable factor which better predicts acute myocardial infarction and related death [66]. Epidemiological data and other epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the incidence of cardiovascular diseases increases incrementally with blood pressure, even within the normal range (45% of cardiovascular events reported at Framingham study occurred at a systolic BP of 140 or lower). Although a threshold for the association between BP and cardiovascular risk is not well established, normal and high-normal BP conferred almost a 2-fold increased risk factor for cardiovascular disease, compared to optimal BP. These studies, as reviewed by Kannel et al. [70], also showed that the combination of other risk factors such as metabolic syndrome greatly augments the hazard ratio of elevated blood pressure.

The study by Strazzullo et al. [73], already mentioned, shows a greater incidence of cardiovascular disease related to a higher salt intake (1.14 relative risk).

3.2.2. Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a disease with increasing prevalence [74]. It is associated with a high risk of both ischemic cardiopathy and cerebrovascular disease, for being a clearly predisposing factor for the development of both large-vessel and small-vessel atheroma. Diabetes pathophysiological mechanisms to cause vascular disease are multiple [75]. It is estimated that 44-52% of deaths in diabetic patients are due to cardiovascular diseases [76]. Results are different depending on when the diagnosis of diabetes is established, before or after age 30. A study carried out in Wisconsin showed that, among patients with a younger onset of diabetes, ischemic cardiopathy and cerebrovascular disease caused 26.9% of deaths (the more frequent cause of death in this group is diabetes) while in patients with older onset this rate was 47.5% [77]. As discussed below, these deaths are mainly due to CHD.

Diabetes Mellitus and CHD

DM is a key-factor in the occurrence of coronary syndrome. The prevalence of DM in ACS varies between 21.1 and 31.7% among registries [52-54]. In the Honolulu Heart Program [78], a prospective cohort study which followed more than 7,000 men for 23 years, the age-adjusted rate of CHD was 14.1 per 1000 person-years in men with known diabetes, 8.8 in those with asymptomatic hyperglicemia and 5-5.9 in groups with normal glucose. This risk is not limited to men, as diabetic women have been also found to have an increased risk of CHD compared to men [55]. As noted earlier, ischemic heart disease is a major cause of death in diabetic individuals. In the study by Moss et al. [77], DM was the cause of death in 24.8% of people with younger onset DM and in 38% of individuals with older onset DM.

Diabetes Mellitus and Stroke

DM is also a risk factor for the occurrence of ischemic stroke. In the Honolulu Heart Program, subjects with known diabetes and asymptomatic hyperglicemia showed an increased risk of ischemic stroke, and these associations were independent of age and other vascular risk factors [79]. Moreover, a recent study showed that in patients with a previous TIA or previous minor stroke, glucose intolerance increased the risk of stroke [80]. However, not all ischemic strokes are equally favoured by the DM: prevalence of DM is 18-32% in atherothrombotic infarction, 20-32% in lacunar infarction and somewhat less in cardioembolic one (8-21%), depending on the series [37-39,81].

In diabetic patients, cerebrovascular disease is a far less common cause of death than coronary heart disease. In the study by Moss et al. [77], cited previously, the stroke was the cause of death in 2.1 of younger onset diabetic patients and in 9.5 of the older onset group.

3.2.3. Dyslipidemia

Hypercholesterolemia is a factor that has been demonstrated clearly related to atheromatosis [82]. Several studies demonstrate a direct relationship between cholesterol levels, triglyceride levels and cardiovascular mortality [83,84]. Even if dyslipidemia has been considered -and is still being considered- a risk factor for CHD and also for stroke, it may have a different relevance in each entity. At the moment no one discusses the relationship between high values of cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol, low levels of HDL-cholesterol and the presence of coronary atheroma and symptomatic coronary disease. However, the relationship between cholesterol and stroke appears to be more controversial and inconsistent across studies, probably because stroke is a much more heterogeneous disease. Many series, especially the older ones, did not differ neither ischemic from hemorrhagic strokes in their analysis, nor the different types of ischemic stroke depending on etiology. Different data about the relationship between hypercholesterolemia and the two entities are exposed below.

Dyslipidemia and CHD

The relationship established for dyslipidemia and the development of atheroma implies a close relationship with the development of CHD, as well. A high LDL and/or low HDL-cholesterol levels predict coronary events [27,85]. In the Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration (APCSC) study, each 1-mmol / l higher level of total cholesterol was associated with 35% increased risk of coronary death [86]. Different registers of CHD showed a proportion of patients with dyslipidemia of 45-54%, which is higher than the proportion of patients with diabetes [52-54].

Dyslipidemia and Stroke

As discussed earlier, hypercholesterolemia has not been clearly established as a risk factor for stroke. There are some studies which found no significant relationship between cholesterol levels and incidence of stroke [87,88], even when analyzing hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke separately. By contrast, in the APCSC study each 1-mmol / l higher level of total cholesterol was associated with 25% increased risk of ischemic stroke (less than increased risk seen in the case of CHD, but still a significant risk), and with 20% decreased risk of fatal stroke hemorrhagic [86]. In the study by Simons et al. [27], unlike what observed with CHD, a high LDL-cholesterol level predicted IS, but HDL- cholesterol level did not. This lack of consistency has been suggested to be due to the heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke, thus some subtypes of stroke would be more related to hypercholesterolemia [89]. This fact is reflected in prospective registries of stroke, where dyslipidemia is described in up to 46% of atherothrombotic infarctions and up to 38% of lacunar infarctions, but in less than 20% of cardioembolic ones [37-39].

3.2.4. Smoking

Relationship in between smoking habit and athero-sclerosis has been clearly established. Tobacco contributes to the progression of the atherosclerotic plaque and to its instability. It facilitates platelet aggregation, increases blood viscosity and damages the endothelium, among other mechanisms of action [90-94]. So, increased risk of CHD and IS occurs in smokers, as demonstrated, almost unanimously, in many studies.

Smoking and CHD

Tobacco use is strongly associated with coronary disease. Studies have also shown that the risk increases with the number of cigarettes [95-97]. In a cohort of nearly 120.000 female nurses, among smokers of more than 25 cigarettes per day, the relative risk of suffering from fatal CHD was 5.5 [95]. In the Copenhagen City Heart Study, the risk increased 2-3% for each gram of tobacco smoked daily [96]. In any case, even smokers of 1-4 cigarettes per day have increased risk of acute myocardial infartion [95]. Some studies conclude that the association of tobacco with CHD is higher in women than in men [96] and that this risk is also increased when smoking habit is associated with the use of oral contraceptives [98].

The attitude of quitting the habit is the best preventive measure, as ex-smokers can see their risk of CHD decrease over the years [95,96,99], reaching a risk similar to a non-smoker person (someone who has never smoked) after about 10 years.

Smoking and Stroke

Smoking is an independent risk factor for all subtypes of ischemic stroke. A meta-analysis concluded that the relative risk of cerebral infarct associated with cigarette smoking was 1.9 [100], with differences depending on age groups: RR in < 55 (before 55 years old) was 2.9, in age 55-74 was 1.8 and in patients older than 74, 1.1. As in CHD, risk was higher in women than in men and the risk was dose-dependent. In an epidemiologic study conducted in Minnesota, the relative risk resulted 3.6 in patients aged 50, 1.9 in patients aged 70 and non-significant after 80 years old [101]. Risk of stroke was about twice as high for passive smokers than for non-smokers [102,103].

Ex-smokers may reduce their risk of suffering a stroke till a RR of 1.2, although this RR remains higher in older people [100]. In the study conducted by Whisnant et al. [101], the increased risk was higher when comparing current smoker vs never & past smokers than when comparing people who ever smoked vs never non-smokers.

3.2.5. Alcohol

Alcohol, taken in moderation, has proven to be a protective factor for cardiovascular disease, especially for CHD. Several hypotheses have been postulated to explain this fact, related to the effects of alcohol on lipid levels and platelet aggregation [104,105], to an effect on increased levels of estrogen [106], or even related to the assumption that moderate alcohol drinking is synonymous with social integration [107]. However, this beneficial effect only occurs for moderate alcohol intake, because, as discussed below, alcohol abuse is harmful and increases the risk of CHD, the same as stroke.

Alcohol and CHD

Prospective studies have reported a lower risk of death from CHD among moderate drinkers, compared with nondrinkers [108-111]. In a prospective study conducted in Denmark, men who drank daily a mean of 12 g of ethanol had the lowest risk to develope CHD [111], even less than men who drank less than once a day. In women, risk was also reduced if they drank at least one day a week, but no difference was found between drinking frequency.

However, it has to be remarked that binge drinking increases the risk of suffering CHD. In heavy drinkers, RR of death from cardiovascular disease was 2.05, most of them due to myocardial infarction [112]. Hence, adults’ risk of CHD in relation to volume of alcohol is described as a U-shaped curve [110].

Alcohol and Stroke

As we have seen with ischemic heart disease, it seems to be a dual relationship between alcohol consumption and incidence of ischemic stroke. Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with lower incidence of ischemic stroke [113,114], but, on the other hand, heavy drinkers have a higher risk of stroke [115]. It has been suggested that recent alcohol consumption may act as trigger [116].

3.2.6. Obesity

Obesity is clearly associated to cardiovascular disease, IS and CHD. Firstly, a higher proportion of HBP, DM and dyslipidemia –three key factors related to cardiovascular risk- can be found among patients with obesity [117, 118]. Moreover, these patients use to have a more sedentary live and a less healthy diet than patients without obesity.

In a recent meta-analysis [119] the incidence of each co-morbidity related to obesity and overweight has been estimated. Among these co-morbidities risk were estimated for CHD and stroke. For men, RR for CHD was 1.81 for obesity based on waist circumference (WC) and 1.72 for body mass index (BMC). Estimated RR for women were higher: 2.69 for obesity based on WC and 3.10 for BMI. Obesity also increases risk of stroke but RR was lower than for CHD. RR was 1.51 for males and 1.49 for females. The heterogenicity present in stroke phisiopathology may explain this risk, lower for IS than for CHD.

Taking into account that obesity is an increasing health problem, it is estimated that the prevalence of CHD will increase by a range of 5 to 16% due to this factor [120].

3.2.7. Physical Inactivity

Physical activity reduces risk of both CHD and IS. The reason for this beneficial effect is multifactorial. First, regular exercise lowers blood pressure and improves lipid profiles [121]. Physical activity also improves endothelial function [122,123]. Other possible mechanisms, such as the reduction of blood viscosity, fibrinogen levels, and platelet aggregability may contribute to the reduction of cardiac and cerebral ischemic events [124].

Physical Inactivity and CHD

Many studies have demonstrated that a sedentary life increases risk of CHD. A meta-analysis estimated a RR of death from CHD of 1.9 in people with sedentary occupations [125]. In a prospective study with post-menopausal women, both walking and vigorous exercise were associated with significant reduction in the incidence of CHD (closer to 50%), irrespective of their age, race or body-mass index [126]. In patients with previous angina, regular exercise reduces the incidence of recurrences [127].

Physical Inactivity and Stroke

Similar to what is observed in ischemic heart disease, moderate and high levels of physical activity reduces the risk of IS. Compared to low-active individuals, moderately active individuals have a 20% lower risk and highly active individuals had a 27% lower risk of stroke incidence or mortality [124]. This decreased risk is related to both intensity and duration of activity [128].

3.2.8. Diet

Mediterranean diet is characterized by a high intake of monounsaturated fat, plant proteins, whole grains and fish, while a low consumption of red meat, refined grains, and sweets [129].

It is associated with beneficial effects on lipids, blood pressure and also inflammatory markers. Several studies have documented an inverse relationship between the adherence to the Mediterranean diet and the incidence of CHD and stroke.

Diet and CHD

There are many studies, in many different populations, concluding that the Mediterranean diet is protective against the incidence of CHD. The Lyon Diet Heart Study, conducted in patients with previous MI, showed that the Mediterranean diet prevents the incidence of both cardiovascular and, specifically, coronary events [130]. Similar results were found in the HALE project, a study conducted in several european countries, including elderly people (hazard ratio: 0.61) [131]. CHD mortality was also reduced in elderly people with a greater adherence to Mediterranean diet (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67). In a recent study including women aged 38-63, women with a higher adherence to Mediterranean diet had a lower incidence of CHD [132].

Diet and Stroke

Only a few studies have specifically evaluated the effect of Mediterranean diet on the incidence of ischemic stroke. In the Nurses' Health Study, discussed earlier, women who adhered to the Mediterranean diet more closely had also a lower risk of IS [132]. In a previous study by Joshipura et al., it had been shown that the consumption of fruit and vegetables, basic part of the Mediterranean diet, significantly reduced the incidence of IS [133].

3.2.9. Atrial Fibrillation and other Sources of Embolism

Cardioembolism is the second most common cause of ischemic stroke, accounting for 21-38% of ischemic strokes [37-39]. In contrast, coronary embolism is a rare cause of MI. Sequelae from a MI, as a ventricular segmental akinesia, ventricular aneurysm or ischemic cardiomyopathy may become an embolic source and therefore be the cause of cardioembolic brain infarction.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac source of embolic stroke, accounting for up to 50% of patients. This proportion increases with age. Other common causes of cardioembolic stroke are myocardial infarction (30%), left ventricular thrombus, valve disease or prosthetic valves [134].

Risk of ischemic stroke among patients with AF averages 3-4% per year, but it varies widely depending on several factors [135,136]. In a sistematic review of the literature, 4 consistent independent risk factors for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation were found: prior stroke, increasing age, previous hypertension and previous diabetes. Prior stroke or TIA was the most powerful of these risk factors and confered a high stroke risk (average 10% per year) [135]. Age was also a consistent independent predictor of stroke in patients with AF, with an incremental increased risk of 1.5 per decade [135].

AF could also be considered a risk factor for CHD. In the Dubbo Study [27], AF predicted CHD, but it was a higher predictor for IS than for CHD. In fact, AF was, statistically, the most powerful predictive factor for IS.

3.2.10. Other Risk Factors

Hyperhomocysteinemia

It has been shown that homocysteine causes changes in the arterial wall, by different mechanisms, implying an increased risk of ACS and IS in subjects with hyperhomocysteinemia. This fact has been reflected in numerous studies.

In a meta-analysis performed by Ford et al. [137], each increase of 5 umol / l in homocysteine concentration corresponded to a non-significant OR for CHD of 1.06 for 2 publications of cohort studies, 1.23 (95% CI 1.07-1.41) for nested case-controls studies and 1.70 (1.50-1.93) for case-control studies. Similarly, the same trend is observed for cerebrovascular disease. The summary OR for a 5-umol / l increase in homocysteine concentration were 1.10 (0.94-1.28) for cohort studies, 1.58 (1.35-1.85) for nested case-control studies and 2.16 (1.65-2.82) for case-control studies. Hyperhomocysteinemia has been associated with both carotid and intracranial circulation disease, with a lower development of collateral circulation, and also with other risk factors directly related to CHD and to cerebrovascular disease, like hypertension [138].

Hypercoagulopathy

Inherited thrombophilia such as deficiency of antithrombin III, protein C or protein S, mutation of prothrombin gene G20210A or factor V Leiden have been associated to venous thrombosis, but their association with arterial disease remains controversial. Presence of an antiphospholipid anti-body, such as lupic anticoagulant or anticardiolipin antibody may also lead to hypercoagulopathy. Different studies failed to find an etiological association between these factors and coronary disease or ischemic stroke, but some trials have suggested that thrombophilia should be important as an etiological factor in young subjects [139-141].

Lipoproteins

Lipoprotein (a) is an atherogenic lipoprotein which has been postulated as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Its plasma levels are not determined routinely. High levels of lipoprotein (a) have been correlated with both CHD [142] and IS [143], although their etiologic association is not clear. In the ARIC study, high levels of lipoprotein (a) significantly correlated with higher incidence of IS in blacks and white women, but not in white men [144]. ApoB/ApoA1 ratio also was associated with myocardial infarction in the INTERHEART study [145]. In the Dubbo Study, both parameters were only predictors of an increased incidence of CHD, but not of IS [27].

Inflammatory Markers

Since atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory process, several markers of chronic inflammation have been studied as potential cardiovascular risk factors. C-reactive protein level is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events, even more than LDL cholesterol [146], and for both CHD and IS [147-150]. Elevated leukocyte count is associated with coronary events, but in a recent prospective cohort study it was not associated with incidence of stroke [151].

Obstructive Sleep-Apnea Syndrome (OSAS)

Many studies have shown that sleep disorders, especially OSAS, are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Individuals with these disorders have 2-4 times greater risk of suffering an ischemic stroke [152]. A similar risk for both ACS and IS have been described in these patients [153]. Several pathophysiological mechanisms have been postulated to explain this increased risk, such as the development of hemodynamic changes, atherosclerosis, arrhythmias, endothelial dysfunction and prothrombotic states, among others, all of them facilitated or triggered by hypoxemia and / or apnea / snoring [152].

4. SUMMARY

In summary, CHD and cerebrovascular disease share similar pathophysiological mechanisms and, consequently, many risk factors. However, the more complex etiology demonstrated for IS lead to a different incidence of these factors in each disease, CHD and IS, the same as in every stroke subtype.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gongora-Rivera F, Labreuche J, Jaramillo A, Steg PG, Hauw JJ, Amarenco P. Autopsy prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:1203–10. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260091.13729.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Touzé E, Varenne O, Calvet D, Mas JL. Coronary risk stratification in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic stroke attack. Int J Stroke. 2007;2:177–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2007.00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coca A, Messerli FH, Benetos A, et al. Predicting stroke risk in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: a report from the INVEST. Stroke. 2008;39:343–8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.De Silva DA, Woon FP, Moe KT, Chen CL, Chang HM, Wong MC. Concomitant coronary artery disease among Asian ischaemic stroke patients. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37:573–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.World statistics 2009. http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2008/es/index.html .
  • 6.Deaths according to the cause of death in Europe. www.ine.es .
  • 7.Deaths according to the cause of death, age and sex in Catalonia. www.idescat.cat .
  • 8. Evolution of mortality causes in Europe. http://www.ine.es/jaxi/tabla.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t15/p417/e01/l0/&file=01001.px .
  • 9.Deaths according to the cause of death in Spain. http://www.ine.es/prensa/np545.pdf .
  • 10.Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mähönen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P. for the WHO MONICA (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) Project. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA Project populations. Lancet. 1999;353:1547–57. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Goff DC, Nichaman MZ, Chan W, Ramsey DJ, Labarthe DR, Ortiz C. Greater incidence of hospitalized myocardial infarction among Mexican Americans than non-Hispanic whites. The Corpus Christi Heart Project, 1988-1992. Circulation. 1997;95:1433–40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.6.1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rosamond WD, Chambless LE, Folsom AR, et al. Trends in the incidence of myocardial infarction and in mortality due to coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:861–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809243391301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goldberg RJ, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Gore JM. A two-decades (1975 to 1995) long experience in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case-fatality rates of acute myocardial infarction: a community-wide perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1533–9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00040-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McGovern PG, Jacobs DR, Jr, Shahar E, et al. Trends in acute coronary heart disease mortality, morbidity, and medical care from 1985 through 1997: the Minnesota heart survey. Circulation. 2001;104:19–24. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.104.1.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, et al. Trends in the incidence and survival of patients with hospitalized myocardial infarction, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 1994. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:341–8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arciero TJ, Jacobsen SJ, Reeder GS, et al. Temporal trends in the incidence of coronary disease. Am J Med. 2004;117:228–33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roger VL. Epidemiology of myocardial infarction. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:537–52. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2007.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lorgis L, Zeller M, Beer JC, et al. Epidemiology of acute coronary syndrome in Europe. Ann Cardiol Angeiol. 2007;56:S2–S7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3928(07)80020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Muller JE, Stone PH, Turi ZG, et al. Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1315–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198511213132103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tofler GH, Muller JE, Stone PH, et al. Modifiers of timing and possible triggers of acute myocardial infarction in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II (TIMI II) Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1049–55. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90356-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goldberg RJ, Brady P, Muller JE, et al. Time of onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:140–4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90577-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bonita R. Epidemiology of stroke. Lancet. 1992;339:342–4. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91658-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:43–53. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00266-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Serena J, Dávalos Segura T, Mostacero E, Castillo J. Stroke on awakening: looking for a more rational management. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16:128–33. doi: 10.1159/000070592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Elliott WJ. Circadian variation in the timing of stroke onset: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 1998;29:992–6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.5.992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Donnan G, Fisher M, MacLeod M, Davis MS. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371:1612–23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60694-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Simons LA, Simons J, Friedlander Y, McCallum J. A comparison of risk factors for coronary heart disease and ischaemic stroke: the Dubbo Study of Australian Elderly. Heart Lung Circ. 2009;18:330–3. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coca A, Messerli FH, Benetos A, et al. Predicting stroke risk in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: a reports from the INVEST. Stroke. 2008;39:343–8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gongora-Rivera F, Labreuche J, Jaramillo A, Steg PG, Hauw JJ, Amarenco P. Autopsy prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with fatal stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:1203–10. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260091.13729.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Libby P. Current Concepts of the Pathogenesis of the Acute Coronary Syndromes. Circulation. 2001;104:365–72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.White HD, Chew DP. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2008;372:570–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Casscells W, Naghavi M, Willerson JT. Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque: a multifocal disease. Circulation. 2003;107:2072–5. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000069329.70061.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Larsen AI, Galbraith PD, Ghali WA, Norris CM, Graham MM, Knudtson ML. APPROACH investigators. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:261–3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Widimsky P, Stellova B, Groch L. Prevalence of normal coronary angiography in the acute phase of suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction: experience from the PRAGUE studies. Can J Cardiol. 2006;22:1147–52. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70952-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ferrer-García MC, Hernández-Antolín RA, Pérez-Vizcaíno MJ, Conde-Vela C, Alfonso-Manterola F, Macaya-Miguel C. Myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation and angiographycally normal coronary arteries: epidemiology and mid-term follow-up. Med Clin. 2007;129:694–6. doi: 10.1157/13112511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Moulin T, Tatu L, Crépin-Leblond T, Chavot D, Bergès S, Rumbach L. The Besançon Stroke Registry: An acute stroke registry of 2.500 consecutive patients. Eur Neurol. 1997;38:10–20. doi: 10.1159/000112896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Martí-Vilalta JL, Arboix A. The Barcelona Stroke Registry. Eur Neurol. 1999;41:135–42. doi: 10.1159/000008036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vemmos KN, Takis CE, Georgilis K, et al. The Athens Stroke Registry: Results of a five-year hospital-based study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10:133–41. doi: 10.1159/000016042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bang OY, Lee PH, Joo SY, Lee JS, Joo IS, Huh K. Frequency and mechanisms of stroke recurrences after cryptogenic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2003;54:227–34. doi: 10.1002/ana.10644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Arboix A, Cendrós V, Besa M, et al. Trends in risk factors, stroke subtypes and outcome. Nineteen-year data from the Sagrat Cor Hospital of Barcelona Stroke Registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26:509–16. doi: 10.1159/000155989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Palomeras E, Fossas P, Cano A, Sanz P. Cryptogenic infarcts. A 1-year follow-up study. Neurología. 2009;24:304–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, O’Neal MA, et al. Secular trends in stroke incidence and mortality. The Framingham Study. Stroke. 1992;23:1551–5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.23.11.1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25–146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Romero JR, Morris J, Pikula A. Stroke prevention: modifying risk factors. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;2(4 ):287–303. doi: 10.1177/1753944708093847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Marín A, Medrano MJ, González J, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease and acute myocardial infarction in a Spanish population: observational prospective study in a primary-care setting. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:38–0. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terént A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology. A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40:1082–90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:915–26. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70193-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Förster A, Gass A, Kern R, et al. Gender differences in acute ischemic stroke: etiology, stroke patterns and response to thrombolysis. Stroke. 2009;40:2428–32. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.548750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Roquer J, Rodriguez A, Gomis M. Sex differences in first-ever acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:1581–5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000078562.82918.F6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Turtzo C, McCullough LD. Sex Differences in Stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(5):462–74. doi: 10.1159/000155983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hasdai D, Behar S, Wallentin L, et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe in the Mediterranean basin. The Euro Heart Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS) Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1190–201. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Bradshaw PJ, Ko DT, Newman AM, Donovan LR, Tu JV. Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set. Heart. 2006;92:905–9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.073122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Heras M, Bueno H, Bardají A, et al. Magnitude and consequences of undertreatment of high-risk patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the DESCARTES Registry. Heart. 2006;92:1571–6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.079673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bello N, Mosca L. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease in women. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2004;46:287–95. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2003.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, Gan R, et al. Stroke incidence among black, White and Hispanic residents of an urban community. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147:259–68. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tsaras G, Owusu-Ansah A, Boateng FO, Amoateng-Adjepong Y. Complications associated with sickle cell trait: a brief narrative review. Am J Med. 2009;122:507–12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Vivo RP, Krim SR, Cevik C, Witteles RM. Heart failure in Hispanics. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1167–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dodani S. Excess coronary artery disease risk in South Asian immigrants: can dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein explain increased risk? Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:953–61. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s2915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rexrode KM, Ridker PM, Hegener HH, Buring JE, Manson JE, Zee RY. Genetic variation of the androgen receptor and risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke in women. Stroke. 2008;39:1590–2. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schürks M, Kurth T, Ridker PM, Buring JE, Zee RY. Association between polymorphisms in the beta2-adrenergic receptor gene with myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke in women. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:351–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gouldbourt U, Tanne D. Body height is associated with decreased long term stroke but not coronary heart disease mortality? Stroke. 2002;33:743–8. doi: 10.1161/hs0302.103814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tanne D, Medalie JH, Gouldbourt U. Body fat distribution and long term risk of stroke mortality. Stroke. 2005;36:1021–5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000162584.39366.1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Myint PK, Vowler SL, Woodhouse PR, Redmayne O, Fulcher RA. Winter excess in hospital admissions, in-patient mortality and length of acute hospital stay in stroke: a hospital database study over six seasonal years in Norfolk, UK. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;28:79–85. doi: 10.1159/000098550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Houck PD, Lethen JE, Riggs MW, Gantt DS, Dehmer GJ. Relation of atmospheric pressure changes and the occurrences of acute myocardial infarction and stroke. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.White HD, Chew DP. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2008;372:570–84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Carrera E, Maeder-Ingvar M, Rossetti AO, Devuyst G, Bogousslavsky J Lausanne Stroke Registry. Trends in risk factors, patterns and causes in hospitalized strokes over 25 years: The Lausanne Stroke Registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;24:97–103. doi: 10.1159/000103123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Vasan R, Larson MG, Leip EP, Kannel WB, Levy D. Assessment of frequency to progression to hypertension in non-hypertensive participants in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358:1682–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06710-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11911-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kannel Wb, Wolf PA, Verter J, mcMara P. Framingham Studyinsights on the hazards of elevated blood pressure. JAMA. 2008;300:2545–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145–53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.PROGRESS Collaborative group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2001;358:1033–41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06178-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Kandala N, Capuccio FP. Salt intake, stroke and cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2009;339:b4567–0. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cooper R, Cutler J, Desvigne-Nickens P, et al. Trends and disparities in coronary heart disease, stroke and other cardiovascular diseases in the United States. Findings of the National Conferences on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. Circulation. 2000;102:3137–47. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.25.3137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mazzone T, Chait A, Plutzky J. Cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from mechanistics studies. Lancet. 2008;371:1800–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60768-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Morrish NJ, Wang SL, Stevens LK. Mortality and causes of death in the WHO Multinational Study of Vacular Disease in Diebates. Diabetologia. 2001;44(suppl 2):S14–21. doi: 10.1007/pl00002934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Cause-specific mortality in a population-based study of diabetes. Am J Public Health. 1991:1158–62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.9.1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rodriguez BL, Lau N, Burchfiel CM, et al. Glucose intolerance and 23-year risk of coronary heart disease and total mortality. The Honolulu Heart Program. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1262–5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Burchfiel CM, Curb JD, Rodriguez BL. Glucose intolerante and 22-year stroke incidente. The Honolulu Heart Program. Stroke. 1994;25:951–7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.25.5.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Vermeer SE, Sandee W, Algra A. Impaired glucose tolerance increases stroke risk in nondiabetic patients with transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1413–8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221766.73692.0b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Bogousslavsky J, Van Melle G, Regli F. The Lausanne Stroke Registry: analysis of 1.000 consecutive patients with first stroke. Stroke. 1988;19:1083–92. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.9.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hanson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1685–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra043430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Verschuren WM, Jacobs DR, Bloemberg BP, et al. Serum total cholesterol and long-term coronary heart disease mortality in different cultures. Twenty-five-year follow-up of the seven countries study. JAMA. 1995;274:131–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Austin MA, McKnight B, Edwards KL, et al. Cardiovascular disease mortality in familial forms of hypertriglyceridemia: a 20-year prospective study. Circulation. 2000;101:2777–82. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.24.2777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Miller M, Seidler A, Kwiterovich PO, Pearson TA. Long-term predictors of subsequent cardiovascular events with coronary artery disease and “desirable” levels of plasma total cholesterol. Circulation. 1992;86:1165–70. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.4.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhang X, Patel A, Horibe H, et al. Cholesterol, coronary heart disease and stroke in the Asian Pacific region. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:563–72. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bots ML, Elwood PC, Nikitin Y, et al. Total and HDL cholesterol and risk of stroke. EUROSTROKE: a collaborative study among research in Europe. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2002;56(supp l1):19–24. doi: 10.1136/jech.56.suppl_1.i19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Shahar E, Chambless LE, Rosamond W, et al. Plasma lipid profile and incident ischemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke. 2003;34:623–31. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057812.51734.FF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ansell BJ. Cholesterol, stroke risk and stroke prevention. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2000;2:92–6. doi: 10.1007/s11883-000-0101-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Renaud S, Blache D, Dumont E, Thevenon C, Wissendanger T. Platelet function after cigarette smoking in relation to nicotine and carbon monoxide. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984;36:389–95. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1984.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Davis JW, Shelton L, Eigenberg DA, Hignite CE, Watanabe IS. Effects of tobacco and non-tobacco cigarette smoking on endothelium and platelets. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985;37:529–33. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1985.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Lassila R, Seyberth HW, Haapanen A, Schweer H, Koskenvuo M, Laustiola KE. Vasoactive and atherogenic effects of cigarette smoking: a study of monozygotic twins discordant for smoking. BMJ. 1988;297:955–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kool MJ, Hoeks AP, Struijker Boudier HA, Reneman RS, Van Bortel LM. Short- and long-term effects of smoking on arterial wall properties in habitual smokers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1881–6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90773-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Schwarcz TH, Hogan LA, Endean ED, Roitman IT, Kazmers A, Hyde GL. Thromboembolic complications of polycythemia: polycythemia vera versus smokers' polycythemia. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17:518–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Willett WC, Green A, Stampfer MJ, et al. Relative and absolute excess risks of coronary heart disease among women who smoke cigarettes. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1303–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711193172102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nyboe J, Jensen G, Appleyard M, Schnohr P. Smoking and the risk of first acute infarction. Am Heart J. 1991;122:438–47. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90997-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sauer WH, Berlin JA, Strom BL, Miles C, Carson JL, Kimmel SE. Cigarette yield and the risk of myocardial infarction in smokers. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:300–6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.3.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Castelli WP. Cardiovascular disease: Pathogenesis, epidemiology, and risk among users of oral contraceptives who smoke. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:S349–56. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70695-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.LaCroix AZ, Lang J, Scherr P, et al. Smoking and mortality among older men and women in three communities. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1619–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106063242303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Shinton R, Beevers G. Meta-analysis of relation between cigarette smoking and stroke. BMJ. 1989;298:789–794. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6676.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Whisnant JP, Wiebers DO, O’Fallon WM, Sicks JD, Frye RL. A population-based model of risk factors for ischemic stroke: Rochester, Minnesota. Neurology. 1996;47:1420–8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.6.1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bonita R, Duncan J, Truelsen T, Jackson RT, Beaglehole R. Passive smoking as well as active smoking increases the risk of acute stroke. Tob Control. 1999;8:156–60. doi: 10.1136/tc.8.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.You RX, Thrift AG, McNeil JJ, Davis SM, Donnan GA Melbourne Stroke Risk Factor Study (MERFS) Group. Ischemic stroke risk and passive exposure to spouses' cigarette smoking. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:572–5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Suh I, Shaten BJ, Cutler JA, Kuller LH. Alcohol use and mortality from coronary heart disease: the role of high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:881–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-11-881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Renaud S, de Lorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1992;339:1523–6. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91277-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Register TC, Cline JM, Shively CA. Health issues in postmenopausal women who drink. Alcohol Res Health. 2002;26:299–307. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Skog OJ. Public health consequences of the J-curve hypothesis of alcohol problems. Addiction. 1996;91:325–37. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.9133253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.McElduff P, Dobson AJ. How much alcohol and how often? Population based case-control study of alcohol consumption and risk of a major coronary event. BMJ. 1997;314:1159–64. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7088.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Flesch M, Rosenkranz S, Erdmann E, Bohm M. Alcohol and the risk of myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol. 2001;96:128–35. doi: 10.1007/s003950170062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Murray RP, Connett JE, Tyas SL. Alcohol volume, drinking pattern, and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: is there a U-shaped function? Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:242–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.3.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Tolstrup J, Jensen MK, Tjonneland A, Overvard K, Mukamal KJ, Gronbaek M. Prospective study of alcohol drink patterns and coronary heart disease in women and men. BMJ. 2006;332:1244–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38831.503113.7C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Malyutina S, Bobak M, Kurilovitch S, et al. Relation between heavy and binge drinking and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in Novosibirsk, Russia: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2002;360:1448–54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11470-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Reynolds K, Lewis LB, Nolen JDL, Kinney GL, Sathya B, He J. Alcohol consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:579–88. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.5.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Elkind MSV, Sciacca R, Boden-Albala B, Rundek T, Paik MC, Sacco RL. Moderate alcohol consumption reduces risk of ischemic stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2006;37:13–9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000195048.86810.5b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Mazzaglia G, Britton AR, Altmann DR, Chenet L. Exploring the relationship between alcohol consumption and non-fatal or fatal stroke: a systematic review. Addiction. 2001;96:1743–56. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961217434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Hillbom M, Numminen H, Juvela S. Recent heavy drinking of alcohol and embolic stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:2307–12. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.11.2307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Freedman DS, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of overweight to cardiovascular risk factors among children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics. 1999;103:1175–82. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Haslam DW, James WPT. Obesity. Lancet. 2005;366:1197–209. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67483-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Gu DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham L, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:88–0. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Bibbins-Domingo K, Coxson P, Pletcher MJ, Lightwood J, Goldman L. Adolescent overweight and future adult coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2371–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa073166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wood PD, Stefanick ML, Dreon DM, et al. Changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins in overweight men during weight loss through dieting as compared with exercise. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1173–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811033191801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Hambrecht R, Wolf A, Gielen S, et al. Effect of exercise on coronary endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:454–60. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002173420702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Sherman DL. Exercise and endothelial function. Coron Artery Dis. 2000;11:117–22. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200003000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Lee CD, Folsom AR, Blair SN. Physical activity and stroke risk. A Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2003;34:2475–82. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000091843.02517.9D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Berlin JA, Colditz GA. A meta-analysis of physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132:612–28. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Manson J, Greenland P, LaCroix A, et al. Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:716–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hambrecht R, Walther C, Möbius-Winkler S, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2004;109:1371–8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121360.31954.1F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Sacco RL, Gan R, Boden-Albala B, et al. Leisure-time physical activity and ischemic stroke risk. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 1998;29:380–7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.2.380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Willett WC, Sacks F, Trichopoulou A, et al. Mediterranean diet pyramid: a cultural modelfor healthy eating. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995;61:1402s–6s. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/61.6.1402S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.De Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N. Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation. 1999;99:779–85. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.6.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Knoops KT, de Groot LC, Kromhout D, et al. Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women: the HALE project. JAMA. 2004;292:1433–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.12.1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Fung TT, Rexrode KM, Mantzoros CS, et al. Mediterranean diet and incidence of and mortality from coronary heart disease and stroke in women. Circulation. 2009;119:1093–100. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.816736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Joshipura KJ, Ascherio A, Manson JE, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA. 1999;282:1233–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.13.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.González Babarro E, Román Rego A, González-Juanatey JR. Cardioembolic stroke: call for a multidisciplinary approach. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27(supp l1):82–7. doi: 10.1159/000200444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working Group. Independent predictors of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Neurology. 2007;69:546–54. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267275.68538.8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working Group. Comparison of 12 risk stratification schemes to predict stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2008;39:1901–10. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.501825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Ford ES, Smith SJ, Stroup DF, Steinberg KK, Mueller PW, Tacker SB. Homocyst(e)ine and cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of the evidence with special emphasis on case-control studies and nested case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:59–70. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Kaplan ED. Association between homocyst(e)ine levels and risk of vascular events. Drugs Today (Barc) 2003;39:175–92. doi: 10.1358/dot.2003.39.3.799452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW, van Bockxmeer F, Lofthouse E, Staples N, Baker RI. Inherited thrombophilia in ischemic stroke and its pathogenic subtypes. Stroke. 2001;32:1793–9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.8.1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Brey RL, Stallworth CL, McGlasson DL, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and stroke in young women. Stroke. 2002;33:2396–400. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000031927.25510.d1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Schwartz D. Utility of routine coagulation studies in emergency department patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7:502–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Nachman RL. Lipoprotein (a): molecular mischief in the microvasculature. Circulation. 1997;96:2485–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Morrisett JD. The role of lipoprotein (a) in atherosclerosis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2000;2:243–50. doi: 10.1007/s11883-000-0026-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Ohira T, Schreiner PJ, Morrisett JD, Chambless LE, Rosamond WD, Folsom AR. Lipoprotein(a) and incident ischemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke. 2006;37:1407–12. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000222666.21482.b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.McQueen MJ, Hawken SW, Wang X, et al. Lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins as risk markers of myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2008;372:224–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61076-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Ridker PM, Rifai N, Rose L, Buring JE, Cook NR. Comparison of C-Reactive Protein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the prediction of first cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1557–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:836–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003233421202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Rost NS, Wolf PA, Kase CS, et al. Plasma concentration of C-Reactive Protein and risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2001;32:2575–9. doi: 10.1161/hs1101.098151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rossouw JE, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers, hormone replacement therapy, and incident coronary heart disease: prospective analysis from the Women’s Health Initiative observational study. JAMA. 2002;288:980–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.8.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Curb JD, Abbott RD, Rodriguez BL, et al. C-reactive protein and the future risk of thromboembolic stroke in healthy men. Circulation. 2003;107:2016–20. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000065228.20100.F7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Li C, Engström G, Hedblad B. Leukocyte count is associated with incidence of coronary events, but not with stroke: a prospective cohort study. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209(2):545–50. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Cardona Portela P, Campdelacreu Fumadó J, Quesada García H, Rubio Borrego F. Sleep-disordered breathing and acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27:104–10. doi: 10.1159/000200447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kiely JL, Mc Nicholas WT. Cardiovascular risk factors in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2000;16:128–33. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16a23.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Cardiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES