Abstract
A best-evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether mechanical pleurodesis results in better outcomes in comparison with chemical pleurodesis in patients undergoing surgery for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax. A total of 542 papers were found using the reported searches, of which 6 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. The studies found compared the outcomes of mechanical and chemical pleurodesis and also focused on the outcomes of the different methods of mechanical pleurodesis: pleural abrasion and pleurectomy. Reported measures were operative mortality, mean operation time, post-operative bleeding, persistent air leaks, chest drain duration, pain levels, pneumonia, respiratory failure, wound infection, pulmonary function, re-exploration for bleeding and air leak, hospital stay, recurrence and re-operation for recurrence. One large cohort study compared the outcomes of mechanical and chemical talc pleurodesis and reported a significant reduction in recurrence with talc pleurodesis in comparison with pleurectomy (1.79 vs. 9.15%, P = 0.00018). Another large cohort study, analysing pleural abrasion, pleurectomy and talc pleurodesis, both in isolation and in combination with apical bullectomy, reported the highest rate of recurrence in bullectomy plus abrasion patients (1.4%) followed by bullectomy plus talc pleurodesis patients (0.4%). No recurrence was seen with other techniques. The reported freedom from surgery at 10-year follow-up was 98.9% with talc pleurodesis, 97.5% with pleurectomy and 96.4% with pleural abrasion, however, with no statistical significance. A prospective randomized study, a retrospective case series review and two smaller cohort studies compared the outcomes of pleural abrasion and pleurectomy as different techniques of mechanical pleurodesis and reported statistically significant shorter operation times, lower rates of post-operative bleeding, re-exploration and pain observed with pleural abrasion and lower rates of recurrence with pleurectomy. Three studies reported the outcomes of apical bullectomy or wedge resection with recurrence rates ranging from 0.4 to 6.2%. We conclude that there is a very similar outcome profile in the comparison of mechanical and chemical pleurodesis, with modest evidence suggesting lower rates of recurrence with chemical talc pleurodesis.
Keywords: Mechanical pleurodesis, Chemical pleurodesis, Pleurectomy, Abrasion, Talc, Primary spontaneous pneumothorax
INTRODUCTION
A best-evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. This protocol is fully described in ICVTS [1].
Clinical scenario
A 24-year-old man is admitted under your care via the emergency services with an atraumatic spontaneous right-sided pneumothorax. He has no known underlying lung pathology and is a non-smoker; however, he has suffered a previous right-sided pneumothorax, treated with intercostal chest tube drainage. Currently, his right lung has failed to re-expand after 48 h of suction drainage and you begin to consider the surgical management options.
Three-part question
In [patients undergoing surgery for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax] does [mechanical pleurodesis] rather than [chemical pleurodesis] result in [the best freedom from recurrence]?
Search strategy
Medline from 1948 to September 2011 using the PubMed interface ‘pleurectomy’ AND ‘abrasion’ AND (‘pleurodesis’ [MeSH Terms] OR ‘pleurodesis’) AND ‘primary’ AND (‘pneumothorax’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘pneumothorax’). Related articles and references were screened for suitable articles.
Search outcome
Five hundred and forty-two articles were found using the reported search strategy. From these, 6 articles were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the question. These are presented in Table 1.
Table 1:
Best-evidence papers
Author, date and country | Patient group | Outcomes | Key results | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Study type (level of evidence) | ||||
Rena et al. (2008) Eur Respir, J, Italy [2] Prospective randomized study (level 2 evidence) |
220 VATS procedures performed on 208 consecutive patients for PSP over a 4-year period Mean age 25 (12–39) 169 male patients 112 patients randomly assigned to pleural abrasion (Group A) 108 patients randomly assigned to apical pleurectomy (Group B) All patients underwent apical lung wedge resection using an endoscopic stapler |
Mean operation time Post-operative acute bleeding (>200 ml/h for 3 h consecutively) Re-exploration for bleeding Mean chest drain duration Persistent air leak rate Re-exploration for large air leak Post-operative pain levels Mean duration of hospital stay Recurrence Re-operation for recurrence |
Group A, 38 min Group B, 55 min (P = 0.0001) Group A, 1 patient (0.9%) Group B, 8 patients (7.4%) (P = 0.036) Group A, 1 patient (0.9%) Group B, 8 patients (7.4%) (P = 0.036) Group A, 2.53 days Group B, 2.92 days (P = 0.065) Group A, 6 patients (5.3%) Group B, 6 patients (5.5%) (P = 0.978) Group A, 1 patient (0.9%) Group B, 1 patient (0.9%) Group A patients reported significantly lower residual chest pain and discomfort than Group B patients on visual analogue scale (P = 0.001) Group A, 3.52 days Group B, 3.89 days (P = 0.08) Group A, 7 patients (6.2%) Group B, 5 patients (4.6%) (P = 0.821) Group A, 5 patients (4.5%); Group B, 4 patients (3.7%) Recurrences re-submitted to VATS and pleural abrasion |
VATS mechanical pleural abrasion is safer than apical pleurectomy for the treatment of PSP; however, there are no differences in recurrence rates between the two procedures |
Shaikhrezai et al. (2011) Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, UK [3] Retrospective case series review (level 3 evidence) |
550 VATS procedures performed on 480 patients for PSP over a 17-year period Mean age, 28.4; 318 male patients; 70 bilateral VATS procedures Isolated bullectomy, 3 Isolated pleurodesis, 58 Isolated pleural abrasion, 2 Isolated pleurectomy, 2 Bullectomy + abrasion, 255 Bullectomy + pleurodesis, 189 Bullectomy + pleurectomy, 41 Conversion to thoracotomy, 4 Talc or kaolin used for pleurodesis Apical pleurectomy performed to the level of the 5th/6th IC space Bullectomy performed by wedge resection using an endoscopic stapler |
Major post-operative complications (mortality, re-exploration, pneumonia, respiratory failure, air leak requiring drain re-insertion, pulmonary emboli) Minor post-operative complications (atrial fibrillation, pain, wound infection, air leak resolving within 5 days) Recurrence |
Major post-operative complications Mortality, 0 Re-exploration for bleeding, 2 (0.4%) Re-exploration for large air leak, 1 (0.2%) Pneumonia, 6 (1.1%) Type-1 respiratory failure, 3 (0.5%) Type-2 respiratory failure, 1 (0.2%) Air leak requiring drain re-insertion, 12 (2.2%) Pulmonary emboli, 0 Minor post-operative complications Atrial fibrillation, 3 (0.5%) Pain, 40 (7.3%) Wound infection, 10 (1.8%) Air leak resolving within 5 days, 8 (1.5%) Recurrence Isolated bullectomy, 0 Isolated pleurodesis, 0 Isolated pleural abrasion, 0 Isolated pleurectomy, 0 Bullectomy + abrasion, 8 (1.4%) Bullectomy + pleurodesis, 2 (0.4%) Bullectomy + pleurectomy, 0 Freedom from further surgery: 98.1% at 5 years 97.8% at 10 years Freedom from further surgery at 10 years: Abrasion, 96.4% Pleurodesis, 98.9% Pleurectomy, 97.5% (P = 0.22) |
When combined with bullectomy, the results of pleural abrasion and chemical pleurodesis do not significantly differ from pleurectomy Pleural abrasion is recommended in young patients reserving chemical pleurodesis for the elderly Pleurectomy may not be necessary |
Chang et al. (2006) Surg Endosc, Taiwan [4] Retrospective case series review (level 3 evidence) |
65 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 3-year period Mean age 25.5 (16–52) 60 male patients 24 smokers 30 patients treated with apical pleurectomy 35 patients treated with pleural abrasion |
Operative mortality Mean operation time Post-operative analgesia use (meperidine hydrochloride) Post-operative chest tube duration Post-operative hospital stay Post-operative air leaks (>5 days) Post-operative wound infection Recurrence Post-operative lung function FVC FEV1 |
Zero Pleurectomy group, 103 min; Abrasion group, 78 min (P = 0.001) Pleurectomy group, 56 mg; Abrasion group, 51 mg (P = 0.746) Pleurectomy group, 3.2 days; Abrasion group, 3.1 days (P = 0.812) Pleurectomy group, 3.9 days; Abrasion group, 3.8 days (P = 0.860) Pleurectomy group, 2 patients; Abrasion group, 1 patient (P = 0.591) Pleurectomy group, 0; Abrasion group, 1 patient (P = 1.00) Pleurectomy group, 0; Abrasion group, 3 patients (P = 0.243) Pleurectomy group, 86.3%; Abrasion group—88.5% (P = 0.574) Pleurectomy group, 94.9%; Abrasion group, 99.0% (P = 0.378) |
Mechanical pleurodesis by means of VATS provides a feasible and safe procedure for treating PSP Apical pleurectomy is more effective in preventing ipsilateral recurrence than pleural abrasion |
Leo et al. (2005), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, France [5] Cohort study (level 3 evidence) |
10 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 1-year period Mean age 36.89 male patients 5 patients submitted to VATS complete pleurectomy 5 patients submitted to VATS pleural abrasion Apical blebs or bullae resected by the use of endoscopic staplers Complete pleurectomy consisted of parietal pleural stripping from the 1st rib to the diaphragm |
Ultrasonography assessment of pleurodesis (detection of ‘pleural sliding’ at 9 pre-defined positions) (Pleurodesis defined as ‘excellent’ when pleurodesis confirmed in all 9 points; ‘effective’ when it was confirmed in >6 points; ‘poor’ when it was confirmed in ≤6 points) Recurrence |
Pleurectomy ‘Excellent’ pleurodesis in all 5 patients Pleural abrasion ‘Excellent’ pleurodesis in 1 patient ‘Effective’ pleurodesis in 4 patients (3 had pleural sliding at 2 points, 1 had pleural sliding at 1 point) 1 pleural abrasion patient (the recurrence was at the level of a persistent pleural sliding zone) |
An ideal pleurodesis is more likely after pleurectomy rather than pleural abrasion Areas of persistent pleural sliding on ultrasonographical analysis are probably at risk of recurrence |
Cardillo et al. (2000), Ann Thorac Surg, Italy [6] Cohort sudy (level 3 evidence) |
432 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 7-year period 153 patients treated with subtotal parietal pleurectomy 279 patients treated with talc pleurodesis Conversion to thoracotomy in 10 patients |
Operative mortality Post-operative complications Recurrence |
Zero Subcutaneous emphysema, 4 patients (0.9%) Localized pleural effusion, 5 patients (1.2%) (4 pleurectomy) Prolonged air leak (>5 days), 6 patients (1.4%) Minimal pleural detachment, 1 patient (0.2%) (talc pleurodesis) Apical haematoma, 1 patient (0.2%) (pleurectomy) Transient Bernard–Horner syndrome, 1 patient (0.2%) Pleurectomy, 9.15%; Talc pleurodesis, 1.79% (P = 0.00018) |
Stapling of the bullae and talc pleurodesis by VATS represents the treatment of choice of PSP |
Ayed et al. (2000) Chest, Kuwait [7] Cohort study (level 3 evidence) |
72 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 3-year period 67 male patients Mean age 25 (15–40) 39 patients treated with pleural abrasion 33 patients treated with apical pleurectomy |
Operative mortality Mean operation time Post-operative pleural drainage Post-operative analgesia use Post-operative chest tube duration Hospital stay Post-operative air leak >5 days Recurrence |
Zero Abrasion group, 50.7 min; Pleurectomy group, 61.8 min (P = 0.0001) Abrasion group, 148.3 ml; Pleurectomy group, 169.6 ml (P = 0.2) Abrasion group, 79.7 mg; Pleurectomy group, 89.3 mg (P = 0.3) Abrasion group, 3.5 days; Pleurectomy group, 3 days (P = 0.1) Abrasion group, 4.5 days; Pleurectomy group, 4.1 days (P = 0.2) Abrasion group, 4 patients; Pleurectomy group, 1 patient (P = 0.2) Abrasion group, 4 patients; Pleurectomy group, 0 patients (P = 0.05) |
VATS is a safe procedure in the treatment of PSP Apical pleurectomy is a more effective way of producing pleural symphysis |
RESULTS
Rena et al. [2] conducted a prospective randomized study of 208 consecutive patients undergoing 220 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). All patients underwent apical lung wedge resection and were randomized to undergo either mechanical pleural abrasion (n = 112) or apical pleurectomy (n = 108). The mean operation time was significantly reduced in the abrasion group in comparison with that of the pleurectomy group (38 and 55 min, respectively, P = 0.0001). Significant post-operative bleeding (>200 ml/h for 3 h consecutively) was observed in 0.9% of the abrasion group vs. 7.4% of the pleurectomy group (P = 0.036), with all patients undergoing re-exploration. Pleural abrasion patients reported significantly lower chest pain levels than patients undergoing pleurectomy (P = 0.001). The observed rate of recurrence was 6.2% in the abrasion group and 4.6% in the pleurectomy group (P = 0.821), with 4.5 and 3.7% of patients requiring re-operation for recurrence in the respective groups. There were no significant differences observed in mean chest drain duration, persistent air leak rate, re-exploration for large air leak and mean hospital stay.
Shaikhrezai et al. [3] conducted a retrospective case series review of 480 patients undergoing 550 VATS procedures for PSP via a combination of different techniques including isolated bullectomy (n = 3), isolated chemical pleurodesis (n = 58), isolated abrasion (n = 2), isolated pleurectomy (n = 2), bullectomy+abrasion (n = 255), bullectomy+chemical pleurodesis (n = 189) and bullectomy+pleurectomy (n = 41). Across all groups they observed the following post-operative complications: mortality—0%, re-exploration for bleeding—0.4%, re-exploration for large air leak—0.2%, pneumonia—1.1%, respiratory failure—0.7%, air leak requiring drain re-insertion—2.2%, atrial fibrillation—0.5%, pain—7.3%, wound infection—1.8% and air leak resolving within 5 days—1.5%. Recurrence was observed in 1.4% of the bullectomy+abrasion group and 0.4% of the bullectomy+chemical pleurodesis group. Other groups were free from recurrence. Freedom from further surgery at 10 years was observed in 96.4% of the abrasion groups, 98.9% of the chemical pleurodesis groups and 97.5% of the pleurectomy groups (P = 0.22).
Chang et al. [4] conducted a retrospective case series review of 65 consecutive patients undergoing VATS apical pleurectomy (n = 30) and VATS pleural abrasion (n = 35) for treatment of PSP. They reported no operative mortality. The mean operation time was significantly reduced in the abrasion group in comparison with that in the pleurectomy group (78 and 103 min, respectively, P = 0.001); however, there were no significant differences observed in the rates of post-operative analgesia use, chest tube duration, air leak lasting >5 days, wound infection, pulmonary function and length of hospital stay. Recurrence was observed in 8.6% in the abrasion group while no recurrence was reported in the pleurectomy group (P = 0.243).
Leo et al. [5] conducted a cohort study of 10 consecutive patients undergoing VATS complete pleurectomy (n = 5) and VATS pleural abrasion (n = 5) for treatment of PSP, analysing the ultrasonographical absence of pleural sliding as a marker of successful pleurodesis. Nine pre-defined positions on the thorax were subjected to ultrasonography. ‘Excellent’ pleurodesis was achieved in all five pleurectomy patients and only one abrasion patient. Pleurodesis in the remaining four abrasion patients was defined as ‘effective’. Recurrence was observed in one abrasion patient, at the level of a persistent pleural sliding zone.
Cardillo et al. [6] conducted a cohort study of 432 consecutive patients undergoing VATS subtotal parietal pleurectomy (n = 153) and talc chemical pleurodesis (n = 279) for treatment of PSP. They reported no operative mortality. The following post-operative complications were observed: subcutaneous emphysema—0.9%, localized pleural effusion—1.2%, prolonged air leak of >5 days—1.4%, minimal pleural detachment—0.2%, apical haematoma—0.2% and transient Bernard–Horner syndrome—0.2%. Recurrence was observed in 9.15% of the pleurectomy cohort and 1.79% of the talc chemical pleurodesis cohort (P = 0.00018).
Ayed et al. [7] conducted a cohort study of 72 consecutive patients undergoing VATS pleural abrasion (n = 39) and VATS apical pleurectomy (n = 33) for the treatment of PSP. They reported no operative mortality and a significant reduction in mean operation time in the abrasion cohort (50.7 vs. 61.8 min, P = 0.0001); however, there were no differences observed in post-operative pleural drainage, analgesia use, chest tube duration, prolonged air leak and hospital stay. Recurrence was observed in four patients in the abrasion cohort and none in the pleurectomy cohort (P = 0.05).
Clinical bottom line
The evidence presented reveals a very similar outcome profile in the comparison of mechanical and chemical pleurodesis. The two largest best-evidence studies directly comparing these techniques reveal a lower rate of recurrence in patients undergoing talc chemical pleurodesis than in those subjected to mechanical pleurodesis (parietal pleurectomy or pleural abrasion) for the treatment of PSP, with statistical significance in one study. However, the larger and most recent of these studies reports no statistical significance between the techniques in freedom from surgery after 10-year follow-up. This observed benefit from talc chemical pleurodesis is strengthened by reports of the safety of its application in young patients [8]. A sub-group analysis of the different techniques of mechanical pleurodesis reveals statistically significant shorter operation times, lower rates of post-operative bleeding, re-exploration and pain observed with pleural abrasion and lower rates of recurrence with pleurectomy.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2003;2:405–9. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rena O, Massera F, Papalia E, Della Pona C, Robustellini M, Casadio C. Surgical pleurodesis for Vanderschueren's stage III primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:837–41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00140806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shaikhrezai K, Thompson A, Parkin C, Stamenkovic S, Walker W. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery management of spontaneous pneumothorax—long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:120–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chang Y, Chen C, Huang S, Chen J. Modified needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:757–62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0275-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leo F, Dellamonica J, Venissac N, Pop D, Mouroux J. Can chest ultrasonography assess pleurodesis after VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:47–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cardillo G, Facciolo F, Giunti R, Gasparri R, Lopergolo M, Orsetti R, et al. Videothoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a 6-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:357–62. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01299-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ayed A, Al-Din H. The results of thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Chest. 2000;118:235–8. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hunt I, Barber B, Southon R, Treasure T. Is talc pleurodesis safe for young patients following primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(1):117–20. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2006.147546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]