Skip to main content
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery logoLink to Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
. 2011 Dec 18;14(3):307–311. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr094

Does mechanical pleurodesis result in better outcomes than chemical pleurodesis for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax?

Amir H Sepehripour 1,*, Abdul Nasir 1, Rajesh Shah 1
PMCID: PMC3290368  PMID: 22184464

Abstract

A best-evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether mechanical pleurodesis results in better outcomes in comparison with chemical pleurodesis in patients undergoing surgery for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax. A total of 542 papers were found using the reported searches, of which 6 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. The studies found compared the outcomes of mechanical and chemical pleurodesis and also focused on the outcomes of the different methods of mechanical pleurodesis: pleural abrasion and pleurectomy. Reported measures were operative mortality, mean operation time, post-operative bleeding, persistent air leaks, chest drain duration, pain levels, pneumonia, respiratory failure, wound infection, pulmonary function, re-exploration for bleeding and air leak, hospital stay, recurrence and re-operation for recurrence. One large cohort study compared the outcomes of mechanical and chemical talc pleurodesis and reported a significant reduction in recurrence with talc pleurodesis in comparison with pleurectomy (1.79 vs. 9.15%, = 0.00018). Another large cohort study, analysing pleural abrasion, pleurectomy and talc pleurodesis, both in isolation and in combination with apical bullectomy, reported the highest rate of recurrence in bullectomy plus abrasion patients (1.4%) followed by bullectomy plus talc pleurodesis patients (0.4%). No recurrence was seen with other techniques. The reported freedom from surgery at 10-year follow-up was 98.9% with talc pleurodesis, 97.5% with pleurectomy and 96.4% with pleural abrasion, however, with no statistical significance. A prospective randomized study, a retrospective case series review and two smaller cohort studies compared the outcomes of pleural abrasion and pleurectomy as different techniques of mechanical pleurodesis and reported statistically significant shorter operation times, lower rates of post-operative bleeding, re-exploration and pain observed with pleural abrasion and lower rates of recurrence with pleurectomy. Three studies reported the outcomes of apical bullectomy or wedge resection with recurrence rates ranging from 0.4 to 6.2%. We conclude that there is a very similar outcome profile in the comparison of mechanical and chemical pleurodesis, with modest evidence suggesting lower rates of recurrence with chemical talc pleurodesis.

Keywords: Mechanical pleurodesis, Chemical pleurodesis, Pleurectomy, Abrasion, Talc, Primary spontaneous pneumothorax

INTRODUCTION

A best-evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. This protocol is fully described in ICVTS [1].

Clinical scenario

A 24-year-old man is admitted under your care via the emergency services with an atraumatic spontaneous right-sided pneumothorax. He has no known underlying lung pathology and is a non-smoker; however, he has suffered a previous right-sided pneumothorax, treated with intercostal chest tube drainage. Currently, his right lung has failed to re-expand after 48 h of suction drainage and you begin to consider the surgical management options.

Three-part question

In [patients undergoing surgery for recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax] does [mechanical pleurodesis] rather than [chemical pleurodesis] result in [the best freedom from recurrence]?

Search strategy

Medline from 1948 to September 2011 using the PubMed interface ‘pleurectomy’ AND ‘abrasion’ AND (‘pleurodesis’ [MeSH Terms] OR ‘pleurodesis’) AND ‘primary’ AND (‘pneumothorax’[MeSH Terms] OR ‘pneumothorax’). Related articles and references were screened for suitable articles.

Search outcome

Five hundred and forty-two articles were found using the reported search strategy. From these, 6 articles were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the question. These are presented in Table 1.

Table 1:

Best-evidence papers

Author, date and country Patient group Outcomes Key results Comments
Study type
(level of evidence)
Rena et al. (2008) Eur Respir, J, Italy [2]

Prospective randomized study
(level 2 evidence)
220 VATS procedures performed on 208 consecutive patients for PSP over a 4-year period

Mean age 25 (12–39)
169 male patients
112 patients randomly assigned to pleural abrasion (Group A)
108 patients randomly assigned to apical pleurectomy (Group B)

All patients underwent apical lung wedge resection using an endoscopic stapler
Mean operation time

Post-operative acute bleeding (>200 ml/h for 3 h consecutively)
Re-exploration for bleeding

Mean chest drain duration


Persistent air leak rate

Re-exploration for large air leak

Post-operative pain levels



Mean duration of hospital stay

Recurrence

Re-operation for recurrence
Group A, 38 min
Group B, 55 min  (P = 0.0001)
Group A, 1 patient (0.9%)
Group B, 8 patients (7.4%)  (P = 0.036)
Group A, 1 patient (0.9%)
Group B, 8 patients (7.4%)  (P = 0.036)
Group A, 2.53 days
Group B, 2.92 days  (P = 0.065)

Group A, 6 patients (5.3%)
Group B, 6 patients (5.5%)  (P = 0.978)
Group A, 1 patient (0.9%)
Group B, 1 patient (0.9%)
Group A patients reported significantly lower residual chest pain and discomfort than Group B patients on visual analogue scale (P = 0.001)
Group A, 3.52 days
Group B, 3.89 days  (P = 0.08)
Group A, 7 patients (6.2%)
Group B, 5 patients (4.6%)  (P = 0.821)
Group A, 5 patients (4.5%);
Group B, 4 patients (3.7%)
Recurrences re-submitted to VATS and pleural abrasion
VATS mechanical pleural abrasion is safer than apical pleurectomy for the treatment of PSP; however, there are no differences in recurrence rates between the two procedures
Shaikhrezai et al. (2011)
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, UK [3]

Retrospective case series review
(level 3 evidence)
550 VATS procedures performed on 480 patients for PSP over a 17-year period

Mean age, 28.4;
318 male patients;
70 bilateral VATS procedures

Isolated bullectomy, 3
Isolated pleurodesis, 58
Isolated pleural abrasion, 2
Isolated pleurectomy, 2
Bullectomy + abrasion, 255
Bullectomy + pleurodesis, 189
Bullectomy + pleurectomy, 41
Conversion to thoracotomy, 4

Talc or kaolin used for pleurodesis
Apical pleurectomy performed to the level of the 5th/6th IC space
Bullectomy performed by wedge resection using an endoscopic stapler
Major post-operative complications
(mortality, re-exploration, pneumonia, respiratory failure, air leak requiring drain re-insertion, pulmonary emboli)







Minor post-operative complications
(atrial fibrillation, pain, wound infection, air leak resolving within 5 days)


Recurrence
Major post-operative complications
Mortality, 0
Re-exploration for bleeding, 2 (0.4%)
Re-exploration for large air leak, 1 (0.2%)
Pneumonia, 6 (1.1%)
Type-1 respiratory failure, 3 (0.5%)
Type-2 respiratory failure, 1 (0.2%)
Air leak requiring drain re-insertion, 12 (2.2%)
Pulmonary emboli, 0

Minor post-operative complications
Atrial fibrillation, 3 (0.5%)
Pain, 40 (7.3%)
Wound infection, 10 (1.8%)
Air leak resolving within 5 days, 8 (1.5%)
Recurrence
Isolated bullectomy, 0
Isolated pleurodesis, 0
Isolated pleural abrasion, 0
Isolated pleurectomy, 0
Bullectomy + abrasion, 8 (1.4%)
Bullectomy + pleurodesis, 2 (0.4%)
Bullectomy + pleurectomy, 0
Freedom from further surgery:
98.1% at 5 years
97.8% at 10 years
Freedom from further surgery at 10 years:
Abrasion, 96.4%
Pleurodesis, 98.9%
Pleurectomy, 97.5%
(P = 0.22)
When combined with bullectomy, the results of pleural abrasion and chemical pleurodesis do not significantly differ from pleurectomy

Pleural abrasion is recommended in young patients reserving chemical pleurodesis for the elderly  Pleurectomy may not be necessary
Chang et al. (2006) Surg Endosc, Taiwan [4]

Retrospective case series review
(level 3 evidence)
65 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 3-year period

Mean age 25.5 (16–52)
60 male patients
24 smokers
30 patients treated with apical pleurectomy
35 patients treated with pleural abrasion
Operative mortality

Mean operation time

Post-operative analgesia use (meperidine hydrochloride)
Post-operative chest tube duration

Post-operative hospital stay

Post-operative air leaks (>5 days)

Post-operative wound infection

Recurrence

Post-operative lung function
FVC

FEV1
Zero

Pleurectomy group, 103 min;
Abrasion group, 78 min  (P = 0.001)
Pleurectomy group, 56 mg;
Abrasion group, 51 mg  (P = 0.746)
Pleurectomy group, 3.2 days;
Abrasion group, 3.1 days  (P = 0.812)
Pleurectomy group, 3.9 days;
Abrasion group, 3.8 days  (P = 0.860)
Pleurectomy group, 2 patients;
Abrasion group, 1 patient  (P = 0.591)
Pleurectomy group, 0;
Abrasion group, 1 patient  (P = 1.00)
Pleurectomy group, 0;
Abrasion group, 3 patients  (P = 0.243)

Pleurectomy group, 86.3%;
Abrasion group—88.5%  (P = 0.574)
Pleurectomy group, 94.9%;
Abrasion group, 99.0%  (P = 0.378)
Mechanical pleurodesis by means of VATS provides a feasible and safe procedure for treating PSP

Apical pleurectomy is more effective in preventing ipsilateral recurrence than pleural abrasion
Leo et al. (2005), Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, France [5]

Cohort study
(level 3 evidence)
10 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 1-year period

Mean age 36.89 male patients
5 patients submitted to VATS complete pleurectomy
5 patients submitted to VATS pleural abrasion

Apical blebs or bullae resected by the use of endoscopic staplers
Complete pleurectomy consisted of parietal pleural stripping from the 1st rib to the diaphragm
Ultrasonography assessment of pleurodesis (detection of ‘pleural sliding’ at 9 pre-defined positions)

(Pleurodesis defined as ‘excellent’ when pleurodesis confirmed in all 9 points; ‘effective’ when it was confirmed in >6 points; ‘poor’ when it was confirmed in ≤6 points)
Recurrence
Pleurectomy
‘Excellent’  pleurodesis in all 5 patients

Pleural abrasion
‘Excellent’ pleurodesis in 1 patient
‘Effective’ pleurodesis in 4 patients (3 had pleural sliding at 2 points, 1 had pleural sliding at 1 point)

1 pleural abrasion patient (the recurrence was at the level of a persistent pleural sliding zone)
An ideal pleurodesis is more likely after pleurectomy rather than pleural abrasion
Areas of persistent pleural sliding on ultrasonographical analysis are probably at risk of recurrence 
Cardillo et al. (2000), Ann Thorac Surg, Italy [6]
Cohort sudy
(level 3 evidence)
432 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 7-year period

153 patients treated with subtotal parietal pleurectomy
279 patients treated with talc pleurodesis
Conversion to thoracotomy in 10 patients
Operative mortality
Post-operative complications











Recurrence
Zero
Subcutaneous emphysema, 4 patients (0.9%)
Localized pleural effusion, 5 patients (1.2%) (4 pleurectomy)
Prolonged air leak (>5 days), 6 patients (1.4%)
Minimal pleural detachment, 1 patient (0.2%) (talc pleurodesis)
Apical haematoma, 1 patient (0.2%) (pleurectomy)
Transient Bernard–Horner syndrome, 1 patient (0.2%)
Pleurectomy, 9.15%;
Talc pleurodesis, 1.79%
(= 0.00018)
Stapling of the bullae and talc pleurodesis by VATS represents the treatment of choice of PSP
Ayed et al. (2000)
Chest, Kuwait [7]

Cohort study
(level 3 evidence)
72 consecutive patients undergoing VATS procedures for PSP over a 3-year period

67 male patients
Mean age 25 (15–40)
39 patients treated with pleural abrasion
33 patients treated with apical pleurectomy
Operative mortality

Mean operation time


Post-operative pleural drainage

Post-operative analgesia use

Post-operative chest tube duration


Hospital stay


Post-operative air leak >5 days


Recurrence
Zero

Abrasion group, 50.7 min;
Pleurectomy group, 61.8 min  (= 0.0001)

Abrasion group, 148.3 ml;
Pleurectomy group, 169.6 ml  (= 0.2)
Abrasion group, 79.7 mg;
Pleurectomy group, 89.3 mg  (= 0.3)

Abrasion group, 3.5 days;
Pleurectomy group, 3 days  (= 0.1)

Abrasion group, 4.5 days;
Pleurectomy group, 4.1 days  (= 0.2)

Abrasion group, 4 patients;
Pleurectomy group, 1 patient  (= 0.2)

Abrasion group, 4 patients;
Pleurectomy group, 0 patients  (= 0.05)
VATS is a safe procedure in the treatment of PSP
Apical pleurectomy is a more effective way of producing pleural symphysis

RESULTS

Rena et al. [2] conducted a prospective randomized study of 208 consecutive patients undergoing 220 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). All patients underwent apical lung wedge resection and were randomized to undergo either mechanical pleural abrasion (= 112) or apical pleurectomy (= 108). The mean operation time was significantly reduced in the abrasion group in comparison with that of the pleurectomy group (38 and 55 min, respectively, = 0.0001). Significant post-operative bleeding (>200 ml/h for 3 h consecutively) was observed in 0.9% of the abrasion group vs. 7.4% of the pleurectomy group (= 0.036), with all patients undergoing re-exploration. Pleural abrasion patients reported significantly lower chest pain levels than patients undergoing pleurectomy (= 0.001). The observed rate of recurrence was 6.2% in the abrasion group and 4.6% in the pleurectomy group (= 0.821), with 4.5 and 3.7% of patients requiring re-operation for recurrence in the respective groups. There were no significant differences observed in mean chest drain duration, persistent air leak rate, re-exploration for large air leak and mean hospital stay.

Shaikhrezai et al. [3] conducted a retrospective case series review of 480 patients undergoing 550 VATS procedures for PSP via a combination of different techniques including isolated bullectomy (= 3), isolated chemical pleurodesis (= 58), isolated abrasion (= 2), isolated pleurectomy (= 2), bullectomy+abrasion (= 255), bullectomy+chemical pleurodesis (= 189) and bullectomy+pleurectomy (= 41). Across all groups they observed the following post-operative complications: mortality—0%, re-exploration for bleeding—0.4%, re-exploration for large air leak—0.2%, pneumonia—1.1%, respiratory failure—0.7%, air leak requiring drain re-insertion—2.2%, atrial fibrillation—0.5%, pain—7.3%, wound infection—1.8% and air leak resolving within 5 days—1.5%. Recurrence was observed in 1.4% of the bullectomy+abrasion group and 0.4% of the bullectomy+chemical pleurodesis group. Other groups were free from recurrence. Freedom from further surgery at 10 years was observed in 96.4% of the abrasion groups, 98.9% of the chemical pleurodesis groups and 97.5% of the pleurectomy groups (= 0.22).

Chang et al. [4] conducted a retrospective case series review of 65 consecutive patients undergoing VATS apical pleurectomy (= 30) and VATS pleural abrasion (= 35) for treatment of PSP. They reported no operative mortality. The mean operation time was significantly reduced in the abrasion group in comparison with that in the pleurectomy group (78 and 103 min, respectively, = 0.001); however, there were no significant differences observed in the rates of post-operative analgesia use, chest tube duration, air leak lasting >5 days, wound infection, pulmonary function and length of hospital stay. Recurrence was observed in 8.6% in the abrasion group while no recurrence was reported in the pleurectomy group (= 0.243).

Leo et al. [5] conducted a cohort study of 10 consecutive patients undergoing VATS complete pleurectomy (= 5) and VATS pleural abrasion (= 5) for treatment of PSP, analysing the ultrasonographical absence of pleural sliding as a marker of successful pleurodesis. Nine pre-defined positions on the thorax were subjected to ultrasonography. ‘Excellent’ pleurodesis was achieved in all five pleurectomy patients and only one abrasion patient. Pleurodesis in the remaining four abrasion patients was defined as ‘effective’. Recurrence was observed in one abrasion patient, at the level of a persistent pleural sliding zone.

Cardillo et al. [6] conducted a cohort study of 432 consecutive patients undergoing VATS subtotal parietal pleurectomy (= 153) and talc chemical pleurodesis (= 279) for treatment of PSP. They reported no operative mortality. The following post-operative complications were observed: subcutaneous emphysema—0.9%, localized pleural effusion—1.2%, prolonged air leak of >5 days—1.4%, minimal pleural detachment—0.2%, apical haematoma—0.2% and transient Bernard–Horner syndrome—0.2%. Recurrence was observed in 9.15% of the pleurectomy cohort and 1.79% of the talc chemical pleurodesis cohort (= 0.00018).

Ayed et al. [7] conducted a cohort study of 72 consecutive patients undergoing VATS pleural abrasion (= 39) and VATS apical pleurectomy (= 33) for the treatment of PSP. They reported no operative mortality and a significant reduction in mean operation time in the abrasion cohort (50.7  vs. 61.8 min, = 0.0001); however, there were no differences observed in post-operative pleural drainage, analgesia use, chest tube duration, prolonged air leak and hospital stay. Recurrence was observed in four patients in the abrasion cohort and none in the pleurectomy cohort (= 0.05).

Clinical bottom line

The evidence presented reveals a very similar outcome profile in the comparison of mechanical and chemical pleurodesis. The two largest best-evidence studies directly comparing these techniques reveal a lower rate of recurrence in patients undergoing talc chemical pleurodesis than in those subjected to mechanical pleurodesis (parietal pleurectomy or pleural abrasion) for the treatment of PSP, with statistical significance in one study. However, the larger and most recent of these studies reports no statistical significance between the techniques in freedom from surgery after 10-year follow-up. This observed benefit from talc chemical pleurodesis is strengthened by reports of the safety of its application in young patients [8]. A sub-group analysis of the different techniques of mechanical pleurodesis reveals statistically significant shorter operation times, lower rates of post-operative bleeding, re-exploration and pain observed with pleural abrasion and lower rates of recurrence with pleurectomy.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2003;2:405–9. doi: 10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rena O, Massera F, Papalia E, Della Pona C, Robustellini M, Casadio C. Surgical pleurodesis for Vanderschueren's stage III primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:837–41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00140806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shaikhrezai K, Thompson A, Parkin C, Stamenkovic S, Walker W. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery management of spontaneous pneumothorax—long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:120–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chang Y, Chen C, Huang S, Chen J. Modified needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:757–62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0275-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leo F, Dellamonica J, Venissac N, Pop D, Mouroux J. Can chest ultrasonography assess pleurodesis after VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:47–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cardillo G, Facciolo F, Giunti R, Gasparri R, Lopergolo M, Orsetti R, et al. Videothoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a 6-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:357–62. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01299-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ayed A, Al-Din H. The results of thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Chest. 2000;118:235–8. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hunt I, Barber B, Southon R, Treasure T. Is talc pleurodesis safe for young patients following primary spontaneous pneumothorax? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(1):117–20. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2006.147546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES