Neuroimmune semaphorin 4A downregulates the severity of allergic response

Abstract

To define the role of Sema4A in allergic response, we employed Sema4A^−/− and WT mice in the experimental model of OVA-induced allergic airway inflammation. We observed a selective increase in eosinophilic airway infiltration accompanied by bronchial epithelial cell hyperplasia in allergen-treated Sema4A^−/− mice relative to WT mice. This enhanced inflammatory response was associated with a selective increase in BAL IL-13 content, augmented airway hyperreactivity, and lower Treg numbers. In vivo allergen-primed Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cells were more effective in transferring Th2 response to naïve mice as compared to WT CD4+ T cells. T cell proliferation and IL-13 productions in OVA_323–339 - restimulated Sema4A^−/− cell cultures were upregulated. Generated bone marrow chimeras showed an equal importance of both lung resident cell and inflammatory cell Sema4A expression in optimal disease regulation. These data provide a new insight into Sema4A biology and define Sema4A as an important regulator of Th2-driven lung pathophysiology.

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of asthma is on the rise world-wide resulting in the increased morbidity and mortality and making it an economic burden to society.^{1, 2} The pathophysiology of asthma is characterized by eosinophil-rich inflammatory cell infiltrates, mucus hypersecretion, airway hyperresponsiveness, and airway wall remodeling.^{3, 4} Despite a number of currently used therapies such as glucocorticoids, β-agonists, anti-histamines, phosphodiesterase inhibitors and anti-cholinergic agents, many patients continue to suffer from the disease exacerbation. Moreover, many side-effects of these medicines which involve bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular systems, also limit their efficacy.^{5, 6} Therefore, novel molecular targets are being investigated ⁷ and novel approaches are being developed ⁸ which may have a profound impact on improving the diagnostic, prevention, and treatment of the allergic asthmatic diseases.

Sema4A belongs to a large family of secreted and membrane-bound glycoproteins which were originally found to be expressed in the nervous system and function as axon guidance molecules.⁹ Recently, Sema4A was located in the lymphoid tissues where its expression was preferentially restricted to APC such as DC and B cells.¹⁰ It was reported to act as a costimulatory molecule enhancing the activation and differentiation of T cells in vitro and potentiating the generation of antigen-specific T cells in vivo.^{10, 11} Sema4A functionally interacts with Tim-2 (T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 2) expressed on T cells, Th2 cells predominantly. ^{10, 11} In non-lymphoid tissues, Sema4A functionally interacts with plexin family members, namely Plexin D1 and Plexin B1.^12–14 These interactions have been shown to play important roles in several physiological and pathological conditions such as angiogenesis,¹⁴ neuron growth cone collapse,¹³ and retina formation.¹²

In vitro, Sema4A-Fc has been reported to enhance T-cell activation, proliferation, and IL-2 production while anti-Sema4A Ab inhibited allogeneic T cell – DC mixed lymphocyte reaction.¹⁰ Mice with a targeted disruption of Sema4A developed normally but showed defects in the DC-mediated T cell response.¹⁵ Whereas Sema4A^−/− DC matured and respond normally to LPS or agonistic anti-CD40 Ab in vitro, the in vivo production of antigen-specific T cells and cytokines was downregulated in Sema4A^−/− mice after challenge with various antigens.¹⁵ Mice deficient in one of Sema4A functional receptors, Tim-2, exhibited increased lung inflammation and Th2 cytokine production in response to allergen.¹⁶ Based on all of the above, we hypothesized that Sema4A may have a critical non-redundant regulatory role in allergic asthma.

In this research, using the experimental model of allergen-induced asthma, we show that Sema4A downregulates the severity of allergic airway response. OVA-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice showed an increased number of BAL eosinophils and a wider spread of multiple inflammatory sites in the airways as compared to similarly treated WT mice. In addition, employing bone marrow chimeric mice, we demonstrate that Sema4A expression by lung resident cells as well as by inflammatory cells is critically important for the regulation of the disease severity. Using the in vivo cell transfer technique, we show here that allergen-primed spleen-derived Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cells are equally effective in either WT or Sema4A^−/− host to induce the substantial lung infiltration with eosinophils in response to OVA challenges whereas WT CD4+ T cells were much less efficient. This could be explained, in part, by a lower number of Treg found in Sema4A^−/− mice in addition to their higher local and systemic IL-13 response to allergen. Our findings establish the cellular mechanisms of Sema4A function in the allergic response regulation and its potential as a novel therapeutic agent for asthma.

RESULTS

Sema4A downregulates allergic airway response

While the role of Sema4A in the experimental myocarditis ¹⁷ and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis ¹⁰ was established previously, its regulation of a Th2 response has not been investigated. Therefore, to detail Sema4A function in the allergic response, WT and Sema4A^−/− mice were subjected to the allergen priming, boost and challenges as depicted in Figure 1a. Control mice were treated with Alum alone and nebulized with PBS. A classical allergic airway response was observed in WT mice after OVA treatment (Figure 2a and b). This response consisted of prominent BAL and airway eosinophilic infiltration where more than 50% of BAL cells were eosinophils (Figure 2a). Eosinophils were also the predominant cells in the lung tissue multiple peribronchial and perivascular inflammatory infiltrates (Figure 2b). Allergic inflammatory response was accompanied by mucus hypersecretion (Figure 2c). All these features of allergic response were significantly upregulated in Sema4A^−/− mice (Figure 2a and c).

Figure 1.

Experimental protocols of the allergen treatment (a) and the in vivo adoptive cell transfer followed by the antigen nebulizations (b). Models are detailed in the Materials and Methods section.

Figure 2.

Sema4A deficiency increases the severity of allergic airway response in mice. (A) WT and Sema4A^−/− mice were immunized with OVA as shown in Supplemental Figure 1a. Control mice were challenge with PBS. (a) The average numbers (n=3–5) of BAL total cells (white bars) macrophages (black bars), eosinophils (forward hatched bars), lymphocytes (reverse hatched bars) and neutrophils (gray bars) ± SEM in one of three representative experiments are shown. *, # p<0.05, differences in absolute numbers of total cells and eosinophils in BAL between OVA-challenged WT and Sema4A^−/− mice. (b) Lung tissue sections were stained with H&E for inflammation and (c) Periodic acid stain (PAS) for mucus cell hyperplasia evaluation. Magnification used for pictures is 40x and for inserts is 100x. (d) Anti-OVA specific IgG Abs in serum samples (n=4 mice/group) were measured using corresponding ELISA kits as described in Material and Methods. *p<0.05, OVA-treated WT versus Sema4A^−/− mice. (e) The levels of cytokines in BAL fluids of OVA-challenged WT (open bars) and Sema4A^−/− (black bars) mice measured by either ELISA or protein array were combined. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3–6 mice). *p<0.05, OVA-challenged WT versus Sema4A^−/− mice. (f) For cytokine CBA in lung lysates and 5x concentrated BALF data were acquired by BD FACS Calibur and shown are FlowJo generated dot plots for individual proteins for an individual mouse in one of 2 representative experiments (n=2/group). For a numeric representation of cytokine concentration, CBA data were calculated using the BD CBA software. *p<0.02 and *p<0.004, MCP-1 and IL-17A in WT vs Sema4A−/− mice, correspondingly. (g) Airway reactivity is shown as the percent increase in PenH over a baseline (n = 6 – 8 mice/group in the separate 3 experiments). *p< 0.05, OVA-treated WT mice versus Sema4A^−/− mice for the corresponding doses of methacholine. Forced oscillation measurements were done in anesthetized mice employing FlexiVent (SCIREQ) and airway resistance is graphed as cm H₂O/ml/s (n = 2 mice per group).

Sema4 deficiency was associated with higher serum levels of allergen-specific IgG1 and IgG2b, but not IgG2a (Figure 2d and data not shown). No significant differences in the total serum IgE levels between OVA-treated WT and Sema4A^−/− mice were found (648.0 ± 89.2 and 714.6 ± 130.7 ng/ml, correspondingly), whereas OVA-specific IgE concentrations differed significantly (409.2 ± 81.4 and 725.0 ± 89.9 ng/ml, correspondingly, p<0.01). Of note, the levels of total IgE and OVA-specific IgE were measured in the sera samples obtained in separate in vivo experiments (n=4–5 mice/experiment).

It is well known that allergic asthma is a Th2-driven disease where Th2 cytokines play critical roles in the disease induction and exacerbation.^{18, 19} To evaluate a possible local lung cytokine dysregulation induced by the Sema4A deficiency, we compared the levels of Th1/Th2 cytokines in the BAL and lung lysates obtained from allergen-treated WT and Sema4A^−/− mice. As shown in Figure 2e, we found a selective increase in IL-13 levels in the BAL of Sema4A^−/− mice when compared to WT mice, whereas other Th2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5) were not affected by Sema4A deficiency. In addition to that, the increased BAL levels of IL-12p40 were detected in allergen-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice. Noteworthy, no substantial differences in the BAL contents of eotaxin, RANTES, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and VEGF were detected between WT and Sema4A^−/− mice (data not shown).

Proinflammatory cytokine CBA data showed decreased MCP-1 levels in the whole lung lysates and BALF obtained from OVA-treated Sema4A^−/− mice as compared to similarly treated WT mice (Figure 2f). Of note, used in this analysis lung lysates were equalized for the total protein content. In contrast, similar levels of TNFα and IL-6 measured with the CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit were found in the 5x concentrated BAL fluids obtained from both lines of OVA-challenged mice. Only IL-17A levels, albeit very low, were significantly increased in Sema4A^−/− mouse BALF.

To assess a direct effect of Sema4A on the airway physiology, we performed the AHR measurements by a non-invasive technique (Figure 2g). We found a significant augmentation in % baseline PenH, an index of airway obstruction, for four increasing doses of methacholine used (from 12.5 mg/ml to100 mg/ml) in allergen-treated Sema4A^−/− mice as compared to similarly treated WT counterparts. The baseline PenH numbers differed significantly between OVA-treated experimental groups (0.75 ± 0.02 vs 0.92 ± 0.03, WT vs Sema4A^−/− mice, correspondingly, p<0.0002), whereas no difference was observed with the lowest dose of methacholine for challenge. Surprisingly, we also found that PBS-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice have a significantly higher airway reactivity to methacholine challenges when compared to PBS-challenged WT mice. The results obtained employing an invasive lung AHR measurement technique correspond those for the invasive lung function measurements (Figure 2g and data not shown).

As Sema4A deficiency obviously increases most measured features of an acute allergic response, we therefore concluded that Sema4A functions as a downregulatory molecule in the experimental model of allergic asthma.

Both lung and bone marrow Sema4A expression are critical for the downregulation of allergic asthmatic response

We previously reported that, in contrast to the lymphoid tissues, mouse lung tissue and cell Sema4A expression is generally low and is only slightly upregulated by allergen challenge. ^{20, 21} Therefore, our next set of experiments was aimed to determine if Sema4A expression by the lung resident or BM-derived inflammatory cells is more critical for the regulation of the severity of allergic airway response.

We generated BM chimeras where irradiated WT or Sema4A^−/− mice received BM from either WT or Sema4A^−/− mice. These chimeric mice were then subjected to allergen treatment (Figure 1a). As expected and is shown in Figure 3a-b, OVA-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice that received Sema4A^−/− BM cells, namely Sema4A^−/− (donor (d)) – Sema4A^−/− (recipient (r)), showed a robust allergic eosinophilic response in their BAL and lung tissues. Concurrently, we observed significantly lower levels of BAL eosinophilia in WT (d) – Sema4A^−/− (r) mice and Sema4A^−/− (d) – WT (r) mice as compared to Sema4A^−/− (d) – Sema4A^−/− (r) mice (120,900 ± 1,900 compared to 150,800 ± 500, and 352,500 ± 1,400 cells, correspondingly). WT (d) – WT (r) group demonstrated an increased number of BAL macrophages as compared to all other chimeric mice treated with allergen. Importantly, the level of eosinophilic infiltration into BAL in WT (d) – WT (r) chimeras was significantly lower than that observed in a positive control of this study, Sema4A^−/− (d) – Sema4A^−/− (r) mice (101,200 ± 21,200 cells vs 352,500 ± 1,400 cells, correspondingly). In addition, eosinophilia in WT chimeras was lower as compared to the chimeric mice involving the absence of Sema4A expression either on structural or hematopoietic cells what additionally supports the important regulatory role of Sema4A in the outcome of allergic lung inflammatory response. The lower density and size of allergen-induced infiltrates was also noted in the lung tissues of corresponding chimeric mice when compared to a positive control for this study, Sema4A^−/− (d) – Sema 4A^−/− (r) mice (Figure 3b). Acute inflammatory infiltrates in BM chimeric mice consisted predominantly of eosinophils, neutrophils and lymphocytes associated mostly with perivascular and peribronchial areas. The PAS staining was the most prominent in Sema4A^−/− (d) – Sema4A^−/− (r) mice where more than 50% of bronchioles were PAS-positive whereas for other chimeric mice this number was not that remarkable with only 2–3 bronchial profiles per tissue displaying PAS positivity (Figure 3c). Of note, no such inflammation was found in the BAL (data not shown) and lungs (Figure 3b) of any chimeric mouse challenged with PBS. Therefore, both lung and BM Sema4A expression is equally critical for the allergic inflammatory response regulation. However, it is not equally efficient for the local lung cytokine response.

Figure 3.

Sema4A expression on BM-derived cells and lung resident cells is critical for the downregulation of allergic airway response. The indicated bone marrow chimeras were generated as described in Materials and Method. Non-irradiated WT mice and the chimeras were immunized with Alum or OVA/Alum and challenged as indicated. (a) Lungs were lavaged and the cells in the BAL were analyzed by the differential counting. The average numbers of BAL total cells (white bars) macrophages (black bars), eosinophils (hatched bars), lymphocytes (dotted bars) and neutrophils (grid bars) ± SEM are shown (n=3–4 mice/group). *, †, #p<0.05, differences in absolute numbers of total cells, macrophages and eosinophils, respectively, in BAL of Sema4A^−/− (d) – Sema4A^−/− (r) versus WT (d) – Sema4A^−/− (r) or Sema4A^−/− (d) – WT (r). WT (d) – WT (r) group was assessed in a separate experiment. (b) Representative lung histology (H&E, 40x; inserts, 100x) from PBS- and OVA-challenged mice is shown. (c) Representative periodic acid stain (PAS) for mucus cell hyperplasia. Magnification used for pictures is 40x. (d) Cytokine contents in concentrated BAL measured using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Data are shown as FlowJo generated dot plots and CBA software calculated cytokine concentrations for polled samples from 2 mice in one of 2 representative experiments.

Cytokine content in 5x BALF was measured using CBA inflammatory cytokine (data not shown) and Th1/Th2/Th17 kits (Figure 3d). Consistent lower levels of IL-6 and TNFα were detected in BALF of WT(d) – Sema4A^−/− (r) mice as compared to other chimeric counterparts. Interestingly, we observed the increased local IL-17A levels (Figure 3d) in both chimeric mice lacking Sema4A lung tissue expression.

Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cells are more effective in transferring allergic response than WT CD4+ T cells

In the lymphoid tissues, Sema4A is expressed on APC, mainly on DC ^{9, 15, 20, 21} and function as a costimulator of T cell activation.^{10, 11} We found that lung tissue DC did not show any measurable Sema4A cell surface expression in either steady state or inflammatory condition. ^20,21 On the other hand, it is also known that Sema4A expression is induced on activated CD4+ T cells mainly of Th1 phenotype ¹⁵ which might either downregulate ²² or potentiate ²³ the allergic inflammatory response. As reported above (Figure 2f and e), we did not find any significant differences in the BALF IFNγ contents between WT and Sema4A^−/− mice suggesting that Sema4A deficiency does not affect the overall negligible Th1 response to allergen in this model. Based on all of the above, we next asked the question whether Sema4A expression by CD4+ T cells or DC is more critical for the regulation of the allergic response severity. For that purpose, we isolated DC and CD4+ T cells from the lungs and spleens of allergen-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice and transferred them into naïve mice intranasally followed by three consecutive OVA nebulizations over a period of 72 h (Figure 1b). We have found that Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cells but not DC were able to induce a substantial allergic eosinophilic response in the cell-recipient WT and Sema4A^−/− mice (Figure 4) upon in vivo Ag challenges. Moreover, Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cells were as effective in WT hosts as in Sema4A^−/− hosts for the induction of eosinophilia after allergen challenge as the relative numbers of BAL eosinophils were not different between the cell-recipient groups. At the same time, WT CD4+ T cells were not as efficient to transfer the allergic response as Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cells. Examination of histology slides demonstrated the presence of multifocal perivascular and peribronchial mono-lympho-eosinophilic infiltrates in the lung of WT and Sema4A^−/− mice that received adoptively transferred Sema4A^−/− CD4+T cells.

Figure 4.

CD4+ T cells but not DC from OVA-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice transfer allergic eosinophilic response to naïve mice followed by allergen challenges. Mice which received either lung DC (CD11c+CD11b+ cells) or spleen CD4+ T cells obtained from either OVA-challenged WT or Sema4A^−/− mice were subjected to three consecutive allergen nebulizations and assessed for lung inflammatory response 24h later (n=3–5). Allergen challenged mice which did not receive cell transfer served as controls. Note the inflammatory cell accumulations in the lung tissues of WT and Sema4A^−/− mice after Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cell transfer followed by allergen nebulizations.

The downregulatory effect of Sema4A on allergic airway inflammation is associated with increased Treg numbers

Considering an emerging critical role of Treg in the Th2 response suppression, ^{22, 23} we analyzed the numbers of Treg in the lungs of WT and Sema4A^−/− mice subjected to the allergen priming and challenges. For this flow cytometry analysis we employed corresponding Abs for the Treg detection (Figure 5a). We found significant differences in the relative and absolute numbers of lung Treg between WT and Sema4A^−/− mice (46.9 – 51.7 % and 31.1 – 38.0% Foxp3+ cells among CD25+CD4+ T cells, correspondingly). At the same time, the numbers of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the OVA-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice as compared to similarly treated WT mice were increased in the lungs (5.4 ± 0.4% and 8.1 ± 0.5% compared to 2.4 ± 0.5% and 6.1 ± 0.2%, correspondingly, p<0.003 – and p< 0.006) and spleens (Figure 5a and b) whereas spleen B cell numbers were downregulated (Figure 5b). This suggests that a defined increased inflammatory response in Sema4A^−/− mice is associated with increases of T cell lung infiltration but a downregulation of Treg.

Figure 5.

Increased T cell and decreased Treg numbers are associated with a heightened allergic response in Sema4A^−/− mice. WT and Sema4A^−/− mice were immunized and challenged with OVA as depicted in Supplemental Figure 1a. Lungs were digested with collagenase-DNAse and spleens were sterily processed omitting a digestion step. Single cell suspensions were analyzed by FACS for the expression of CD4 and CD8 T cell markers (a, b). Gated CD4+ T cells were further analyzed for the expression of CD25 and Foxp3 and the relative number of CD4+Foxp3+ cells was ascertained in comparison to a control rat IgG protein stain (a). Spleen T and B cell relative numbers in one out of three representative independent experiments are shown (b).

Sema4A deficiency upregulates the in vitro recall T cell response to OVA_323–339 peptide but not to OVA protein

As Sema4A expression on APC is reported to be a critical costimulator for Ag-specific T cell activation,¹⁰ we analyzed the in vitro spleen MNC response to OVA restimulation (Figure 6). Employing two distinct methods for T cell proliferation measurement, we have found that a proliferative response to a whole OVA protein was not affected by Sema4A deficiency whereas the response to OVA_323–339 peptide was significantly upregulated (Figure 6a and b). As Tim-2 is a reported functional Sema4A receptor on T cells, ¹⁰ we concluded that Sema4A-Tim2 interaction may play an important but not exclusive role in the downregulation of the in vivo response to allergen. This conclusion is based on the reported above observation that the in vitro T cell recalled response to a whole protein was not compromised by Sema4A deficiency and on the results of our previous study shown the specifics of the lung tissue Sema4A and its receptors peptide was affected by Sema4A deficiency. More prominent effect was found on Th2 cytokine (IL-5 and especially IL-13) production by OVA_323–339-restimulated spleen MNC (Figure 6c). No significant differences in the cell culture supernatant’s levels of IL-4, IFNγ, IL-6 and IL-10 were found between WT and Sema4A^−/− OVA_323–339-restimulated spleen MNC. The noted higher levels of IL-17A in Sema4A^−/− cultures (7.8±1.8 pg/ml vs 4.1±2.0 in WT mice) were not statistically significant.

Figure 6.

Sema4A deficiency does not affect the in vitro recall T cell response to a whole allergen but upregulates the response to the OVA_323–339 peptide challenge. (a–c) Spleen MNC were obtained from allergen-treated WT (open circles or bars) and Sema4A^−/− (black circles or bars) mice as described in the Materials and Methods. Cells were stimulated with either increasing doses of OVA (A) or 200 μg/ml of OVA_323–339 peptide (b–c) for 72h. (a–b) Proliferation was measured in triplicate wells. [H]³ was added to the cultures for the last 24h before cell harvest. Data are presented as mean cpm ± SEM of [H]³ incorporation in 72h cultures. (b) Means and SEM are shown for the measured O.D. of cells incubated with WST-1 solution for the colorimetric proliferation visualization. Means and SEM of [H]³ incorporation in 72h cultures. (c) Supernatants were taken at 72h from the in vitro cell cultures restimulated with OVA_323–339 peptide. IL-5 and IL-13 contents are expressed as the average of corresponding cytokine concentration for 2 representative samples for each point.

DISCUSSION

In this study we demonstrate that Sema4A, which initially was reported to act as a critical positive regulator of T cell activation and function, plays a downregulatory role in allergic airway inflammatory response. Its absence in vivo in Sema4A^−/− mice upregulated many features of allergic response such as eosinophilic BAL and lung tissue infiltration, mucous cell hyperplasia, AHR to methacholine challenges, sera Ag-specific IgG1/ IgG2b/IgE contents, and IL-13 levels in BAL, sera, and cell cultures.

The latter is especially interesting as it is well known that IL-13 is a critical Th2 cytokine for the induction and regulation of allergic response.^24–28 When IL-13 was blocked systemically, it resulted in a complete reversal of the allergen-induced AHR and mucus overproduction in the mouse experimental model of asthma.²⁴ However, this blockade did not affect significantly airway eosinophilia and sera OVA-specific IgE levels. Nevertheless, when IL-13 was blocked locally, allergen-induced pulmonary eosinophilia was significantly attenuated.²⁵ Furthermore, the importance of IL-13 in the induction and regulation of airway eosinophilia was defined in the studies employing a recombinant IL-13 administration to the mice ^{24, 25} which alone, in IL-4Rα–dependent manner, was able to induce eosinophilic infiltration and time-dependent increases in total sera IgE levels.²⁶ Therefore, IL-13 alone is able to control a full asthmatic phenotype. Indeed, studies in IL-13 transgenic mice have demonstrated the IL-13-dependent mononuclear cell/ eosinophil inflammation, AHR, and mucus cell metaplasia.²⁷ We found a clear association of the increased lung local IL-13 levels and increased mucus secretions observed in OVA-challenged Sema4A^−/− mice as compared to WT mice (Figure 2c–d). The importance of IL-13 in the mucous cell hyperplasia was demonstrated in several previous studies which have shown that the mice lacking IL-13 ²⁸ or IL-4Rα (a common receptor subunit for IL-4 and IL-13 ²⁹), or STAT6 (the IL-4Rα signaling component ³⁰), lack goblet cell hyperplasia in response to antigen challenges. Needless to say, the mechanism of IL-13 regulation by Sema4A remains to be determined.

Following OVA treatment, the Sema4A deficiency resulted in the increased AHR in response to increasing doses of methacholine as compared to the similarly treated WT mice (Figure 2g). Interestingly, PBS-treated Sema4A^−/− mice show higher airway reactivity when compared to PBS-treated WT mice. We have shown previously that OVA treatment leads to the induction of Sema4A expression in the airway smooth muscle (SM) cells.^{20, 21} Therefore, it might play some currently undefined role in the SM function. The lack of Sema4A may increase the sensitivity of the response of SM to an external pharmacological contractile stimulant such as methacholine resulting in a higher airway reactivity which we observed in PBS-treated Sema4A^−/− mice.³¹ The increased AHR in OVA-treated Sema4A^−/− mice might also be directly associated with increased local IL-13 levels. ^{26, 27}

Sema4A deficiency is also associated with a systemic Th2 dysregulation (Figure 6c). Previous observation has shown the induction of Sema4A expression on activated Th1 cells and its necessity for the optimal in vitro Th1 generation and T-bet expression what significantly affected Th1/Th2 differentiation.¹⁵ At the same time, the in vivo Th1 cell response (IFNγ and IgG2b production) to Ag was downregulated in Sema4A^−/− mice whereas Th2 response (IL-4 and IgG1 production) was not affected. Of note, we did not find any significant differences in IFNγ contents in BALF (Figure 2e–f) and Ag-restimulated spleen cell culture supernatants (data not shown) between Sema4A^−/− and WT mice. Interestingly, we find increases in the sera OVA-specific Th2-dependent IgG1 and IgG2b ³² levels in allergen-treated Sema4A^−/− as compared to WT mice (Figure 2e). The seeming discrepancy in the results could be explained by the different immunization protocols and different adjuvants used. Indeed, immunized with OVA in CFA Sema4A^−/− mice showed a substantially lower recall response in the DTH model as compared to WT mice.¹⁵

Our study of the in vivo response of chimeric mice to allergen has shown that Sema4A on BM-derived inflammatory cells and on lung resident cells is critically important for the allergic response regulation (Figure 3a). However, the AHR examination of chimeric mice demonstrated no differences between groups (data not shown) suggesting that the intensity of inflammatory response might dissociate with AHR ³³ and that lung resident cell Sema4A expression, airway smooth muscle cells in particular,^{20, 21} most probably plays a protective role.

The especially interesting observation includes a low but significant increase of IL-17A in Sema4A^−/− mice in allergen-induced inflammation model (Figure 2f) and in chimeric mice lacking Sema4A on lung resident cells (Figure 3d). The role of Th17 cytokines IL-17A and IL-17F in asthma has been a subject of numerous recent basic research and clinical studies.^34–38 Recent studies in animal models have shown that the allergic sensitization through the airways but not through the peritoneum induced a strong Th17 response with AHR and lung neutrophilic but not eosinophilic inflammation.³⁶ IL-17R deficiency downregulated the numbers of tissue-infiltrating neutrophils but upregulated eosinophil numbers in this model. The other study employing i.p. OVA sensitization has shown that CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages but not T cells in the airways of challenged mice were the major cellular source of IL-17. ³⁵ Interestingly, studies in human asthmatic patients have shown the increased numbers of IL-17+ cells in sputum and BAL in subjects with asthma as compared to control non-asthmatic subjects. ³⁴ Moreover, eosinophils were active producers of this cytokine which also was detected in a subset of sputum and BAL T cells. We did not find a significant difference in IL-17A levels in supernatants harvested from spleen MNC cultures with OVA peptide although there was a trend for a higher concentration of this cytokine in Sema4A^−/− cell cultures. Based on all of the above, it is tempting to conclude that Sema4A regulates, either directly or indirectly, Th17 response to allergen systemically and in the lung.

We show that allergic response was equally efficient in both WT and Sema4A^−/− mice after Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cell transfer whereas the in vivo Ag-primed lung Sema4A^−/− DC were not able to transfer such response (Figure 4). It is currently well established that T cells of Th2 phenotype are critical for asthma initiation and progression.^{18, 19} DC are critical for Th2 priming and necessary for the development of both, acute and chronic disease phenotypes.³⁹ We were interested to determine whether allergen-primed Sema4A^−/− DC or CD4+ T cells are able to transfer the allergic inflammatory phenotype to naïve mice followed by allergen nebulizations. It is known that OVA treatment through the airways without any adjuvant does not lead to the inflammatory response ^{40, 41} what we observed in the control allergen-nebulized WT and Sema4A^−/− animals in this study (Figure 4). The effective transfer of the allergic disease by allergen-primed WT CD4+ T cells has been described previously ^{40, 42} as well as the ability of the in vivo transferred allergen-primed BM-derived WT DC to induce asthmatic responses.^{43, 44} However, lung DC, most probably due to their low number and difficulties in isolation, were used only in one cell transfer study.⁴⁵ This particular study has shown that two distinct subpopulations of lung DC, namely CD11c^highCD11b^low and CD11c^lowD11b^high, when adoptively transferred to OVA-sensitized and challenged mice before last allergen nebulization, inhibited AHR and lung inflammation. Of note, sorted lung DC used for our study were CD11c+CD11b+ and, therefore, consist of these two different lung DC subpopulations. Again, as noted above, sorted lung DC subpopulations were transferred to the allergen-primed- and – challenged mice followed by a single challenge ⁴⁵ whereas we used naïve DC recipient mice.

As expected, based on the observed increased severity of allergic response in Sema4A^−/− mice, we found increased numbers of T cells in the lung tissue single cell suspensions using a flow cytometry assay with corresponding Abs (Figure 5). However, Treg numbers were downregulated in OVA-challenged Sema4A^−/− mouse lungs. It is well established that CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells downregulate Th2 response by multiple mechanisms and, vise versa, that Th2 cytokines display a downregulatory effect on Treg.⁴⁶ Therefore, the reported here increased allergic response in Sema4A^−/− mice as compared to WT mice can be explained, in part, by the increased local IL-13 levels (Figure 2e) and decreased Treg numbers (Figure 5). The decreased Treg numbers in Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cell preparations used in the cell transfer experiments can also explain the superior efficiency of Sema4A^−/− CD4+ T cells as compared to WT CD4+ T cells in transferring the allergic response to naïve mice (Figure 4).

In conclusion, our previous observations on Sema4A-receptor expression ^{20, 21} and our new functional data reported here suggest that a downregulatory effect of Sema4A in allergic asthma is a complex venue which can not be simplified by its role in DC T cell interaction and involves other cells, lung resident cells and inflammatory cells, many of which express functional receptors for Sema4A such as Plexin B1 and Plexin D1.^{20, 21} These Plexins play important roles in cell migration ⁴⁷ and angiogenesis ¹⁴ which both are critical components of asthma pathogenesis. If expressed on immune cells, ^{20, 21} these Plexins may also play role in their activation and function.

Materials and Methods

Mice

The generation and characterization of Sema4A^−/− mice has been described in details previously.¹⁵ C57BL/6 mice (WT) were purchased from Taconic. Mice were bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions within the animal facility at University of Maryland School of Medicine. All procedures on mice were performed according to the animal protocol approved by University of Maryland School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee. Age- and sex-matched mice were used in all experiments.

Anesthetic

Avertin in dose of 0.3 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg by i.p. injection was used as previously described ³² to anesthetize or euthanize the mice, correspondingly.

Experimental model of allergic airway response

Mice were treated with chicken OVA (Sigma) as described previously ²⁰ (Figure 1a). Briefly, 100 μg OVA/2 mg Alum/200 μl was delivered intraperitoneally (i.p.) to WT and Sema4A−/− mice on days 0 and 5. Control mice were injected with sterile endotoxin-free PBS/Alum. On days 12 and 14, mice received a 40 min aerosol challenge of either PBS (control animals) or 1% (w/v) OVA, using Invacare Envoy aerosol compressor. Twenty-four hours after last nebulization, the AHR in response to the increasing doses of methacholine was measured as an indicator of changes in the airway resistance. Mice were euthanized 48h after the last OVA nebulization for other analyses.

Generation of bone marrow (BM) chimeras

Bone marrows were collected and single cell suspensions were prepared as detailed previously.³⁰ BM recipient mice were irradiated with a single dose of 500 Rad using Sheppard Mark I model 68 irradiator. Within 6h after irradiation, 8 × 10⁶ BM cells were injected i.p. into the recipient mouse. Allergen treatment according to the defined above protocol (Figure 1a) started 6 weeks post-transfer.

In vivo adoptive cell transfer

For the adoptive cell transfer experiments, the cell-donor mice were treated with OVA as described above and shown in Figure 1a. Lungs and spleens were harvested on days 16 and 19, respectively, and processed sterilely to obtain single cell suspensions.^{48, 49} Lung DC were isolated using anti-CD11c (N418) plus anti-CD11b (120-000-300) beads and LS positive selection columns (all from Miltenyi Biotechnology). Spleen CD4+ T cells were isolated using EasySep Negative Selection Mouse CD4+ T cell Enrichment Kit and an EasySep® column-free magnet, both from StemCell Technologies, according to the manufacturer instructions. The purity of isolated DC (90%) and CD4+ T cells (95%) was ascertained by flow cytometry analyses. Enriched cell populations were resuspended in sterile endotoxin-free PBS and 2 × 10⁶ DC/50μl/mouse or 3 × 10⁶ CD4+ T cells/50μl/mouse were transferred i.n. to the naïve mice. The cell-recipient mice were then nebulized with 1% OVA in PBS (or PBS alone for control animals) on days 1, 2, and 3 post-transfer (Figure 1b). On day 4 post-transfer, BAL and serum were retrieved and lung tissues were collected.

Airway hyperreactivity measurements

AHR measurements to methacholine challenges were performed 24h after last Ag nebulization using either non-invasive (BUXCO Electronics) or invasive (FlexiVent, SCIREQ) techniques as previously described. ^{50, 51}

Histochemistry

Core Facility at the Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases was used for histochemistry (H&E and PAS stains) of deparaffinized lung tissues.³⁰

Cellular composition and cytokine-chemokine content in bronchoalveolar lavages and lung tissue lysates

Bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) were performed 48h after last Ag nebulization, cells and BALF collected, cytospin made and cell counts performed as described earlier.⁵¹ BAL and lung lysate cytokine and chemokine levels were determined using Searchlight Proteome Array (Aushon), ELISA kits (R&D Systems), and CBA kits (552364, BD Biosciences).^{30, 32} Array and CBA data were analyzed using the ArrayVision software and FlowJo plus BD CBA softwares, correspondingly. All ELISA plates were read on the Emax Precision Microplate reader (Molecular Devices) using the manufacturer specified wavelengths for each assay. Intact BAL fluids were used in the Proteome Array and ELISA. In the CBA assays, whole lung tissue lysates ⁵¹ and 5 times (5x) concentrated (Amicon Ultra 3K membranes, Millipore) BAL fluids were used.

Sera Ab measurements

OVA-specific IgG Ab levels in sera were determined using corresponding IgG subclass standards and AP-labeled anti-IgG Ab (Southern Biotechnology) as previously described.³² Plates were covered with an optimal concentration of 10 μg/ml of OVA (Sigma) defined in the previous dose-response ELISA assays. OVA-specific IgE levels were measured by ELISA (MD Bioproduct) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Total serum IgE was measured by ELISA using matching antibody pairs (R35–72 and R35–92) obtained from BD Pharmingen as previously described. ³²

Proliferation assays

Cell proliferation was measured using either [H]3 incorporation assay or Quick cell proliferation assay kit (ab65473, Abcam). Briefly, single cell suspensions were prepared from spleens of either PBS- or OVA-challenged mice on a day 5 post-challenge. ³² Spleen MNC were plated to a density of 1 × 10⁶ cells/200μl in 96-well tissue culture plates (Cellstar, Greiner) and stimulated with either ConA (10μg/ml), LPS (100μg/ml), OVA (from 0.001 to 100 mg/ml), or OVA_323–339 peptide (200μg/ml) as previously described.^{30, 32, 49} After 72h of incubation, [H]³ thymidine (Perkinson-Maer) was added to the wells and plates were harvested on Packard Filtermate harvester (Packard Instruments) 24h later. In a colorimetric proliferation assay, 10μl of tetrazolium salt WST-1 solution was added to each well followed by 4h of further incubation. The plates were read in the ELISA plate reader at 450 nm with a reference wavelength of 650nm.

Flow cytometry

Flow cytometry of lung and spleen single cell suspensions was performed as previously described ^{30, 48} using the BD Biosciences Abs for the following cell markers: I-A^b (PE), CD4 (FITC), CD8 (PerCP), CD25 (PE), and B220 (FITC). Intracellular staining for Foxp3 was done using anti-Foxp3 (APC) Ab or rat IgG2a (APC) isotype control Ab (both from eBioscience).³⁰ Cells gated by forward- and side-scatter parameters were analyzed using either the CELLQuest or FlowJo software at the Flow Cytometry Facility, Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases.

Statistics

Data were summarized as mean ± SEM. To calculate the significance levels between the experimental groups, Student’s t test (Microsoft Excel) and Mann-Whitney test (Prizm-4) were performed.

Abbreviations used

Sema4A

semaphoring 4A

rSema4A

recombinant semaphoring 4A protein

AHR

airway hyperreactivity

Tim-2

T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 2

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor