Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Behavior Analyst logoLink to The Behavior Analyst
. 1991 Fall;14(2):95–105. doi: 10.1007/BF03392557

Analyzing the reinforcement process at the human level: Can application and behavioristic interpretation replace laboratory research?

Alan Baron, Michael Perone, Mark Galizio
PMCID: PMC2733493  PMID: 22478086

Abstract

Critics have questioned the value of human operant conditioning experiments in the study of fundamental processes of reinforcement. Contradictory results from human and animal experiments have been attributed to the complex social and verbal history of the human subject. On these grounds, it has been contended that procedures that mimic those conventionally used with animal subjects represent a “poor analytic preparation” for the explication of reinforcement principles. In defending the use of conventional operant methods for human research, we make three points: (a) Historical variables play a critical role in research on processes of reinforcement, regardless of whether the subjects are humans or animals. (b) Techniques are available for detecting, analyzing, and counteracting such historical and extra-experimental influences; these include long-term observations, steady state designs, and, when variables are not amenable to direct control (e.g., age, gender, species), selection of subjects with common characteristics. (c) Other forms of evidence that might be used to validate conditioning principles—applied behavior analysis and behavioristic interpretation—have inherent limitations and cannot substitute for experimental analysis. We conclude that human operant conditioning experiments are essential for the analysis of the reinforcement process at the human level, but caution that their value depends on the extent to which the traditional methods of the experimental analysis of behavior are properly applied.

Keywords: human operant research, reinforcement principles, behavioral history, individual differences, steady-state methods, applied behavior analysis, behavioristic interpretation

Full text

PDF
95

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azrin N. H. Some Effects of Noise on Human Behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):183–200. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baer D. M. A flight of behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;4(2):85–91. doi: 10.1007/BF03391857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baron A., Galizio M. Clock control of human performance on avoidance and fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Sep;26(2):165–180. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baron A., Kaufman A. Human, free-operant avoidance of "time out" from monetary reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):557–565. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baron A., Perone M. The place of the human subject in the operant laboratory. Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;5(2):143–158. doi: 10.1007/BF03392383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrett J. E. Behavioral history as a determinant of the effects of d-amphetamine on punished behavior. Science. 1977 Oct 7;198(4312):67–69. doi: 10.1126/science.408925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bernstein D. J. Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Designing session logistics-how long, how often, how many? Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;11(1):51–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03392455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. CHRISTIE R. Experimental naiveté and experiential naiveté. Psychol Bull. 1951 Jul;48(4):327–339. doi: 10.1037/h0060191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Catania A. C., Matthews B. A., Shimoff E. Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):233–248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crossman E. Las Vegas knows better. Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):109–110. doi: 10.1007/BF03391879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deitz S. M. Defining applied behavior analysis: an historical analogy. Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;5(1):53–64. doi: 10.1007/BF03393140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Deitz S. M. Two correct definitions of "Applied". Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):105–106. doi: 10.1007/BF03391877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Egli M., Thompson T. Effects of methadone on alternative fixed-ratio fixed-interval performance: latent influences on schedule-controlled responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):141–153. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Epling W. F., Pierce W. D. Applied behavior analysis: New directions from the laboratory. Behav Anal. 1983 Spring;6(1):27–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03391871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Estes W. K. Reinforcement in human behavior. Am Sci. 1972 Nov-Dec;60(6):723–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. FERSTER C. B. The use of the free operant in the analysis of behavior. Psychol Bull. 1953 Jul;50(4):263–274. doi: 10.1037/h0055514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galizio M., Buskist W. Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Selecting reinforcers and arranging contingencies. Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;11(1):65–69. doi: 10.1007/BF03392457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HOLLAND J. G. Human vigilance: the rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections. Science. 1958 Jul 11;128(3315):61–67. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3315.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hake D. F. The basic-applied continuum and the possible evolution of human operant social and verbal research. Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;5(1):21–28. doi: 10.1007/BF03393137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hayes S. C., Rincover A., Solnick J. V. The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Summer;13(2):275–285. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hineline P. N. The relationships between subject and experimenter (Editorial). J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Mar;45(2):123–127. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1960 Apr;59:246–253. doi: 10.1037/h0041661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Laties V. G., Weiss B. Human Observing Behavior after Signal Detection. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jan;3(1):27–33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McPherson A., Bonem M., Green G., Osborne J. G. A citation analysis of the influence on research of Skinner's verbal behavior. Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):157–167. doi: 10.1007/BF03391898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Menich S. R., Baron A. Social housing of rats: life-span effects on reaction time, exploration, weight, and longevity. Exp Aging Res. 1984 Summer;10(2):95–100. doi: 10.1080/03610738408258550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Michael J. Flight from behavior analysis. Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;3(2):1–21. doi: 10.1007/BF03391838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morris E. K., Johnson L. M., Todd J. T., Higgins S. T. Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Subject selection. Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;11(1):43–50. doi: 10.1007/BF03392454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Perone M., Baron A. Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):239–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Perone M. Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Use and abuse of subjects' verbal reports. Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;11(1):71–75. doi: 10.1007/BF03392458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Perone M. On the impact of human operant research: Asymmetrical patterns of cross-citation between human and nonhuman research. Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;8(2):185–189. doi: 10.1007/BF03393150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pierce W. D., Epling W. F. What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? Behav Anal. 1980 Spring;3(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03392373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pilgrim C., Johnston J. M. Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Issues in instructing subjects. Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;11(1):59–64. doi: 10.1007/BF03392456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Poling A. Comparing humans to other species: We're animals and they're not infrahumans. Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):211–212. doi: 10.1007/BF03391905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Poling A., Picker M., Grossett D., Hall-Johnson E., Holbrook M. The schism between experimental and applied behavior analysis: Is it real and who cares? Behav Anal. 1981 Fall;4(2):93–102. doi: 10.1007/BF03391858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Poppen R. The fixed-interval scallop in human affairs. Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;5(2):127–136. doi: 10.1007/BF03392381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Spielberger C. D., DeNike L. D. Descriptive behaviorism versus cognitive theory in verbal operant conditioning. Psychol Rev. 1966 Jul;73(4):306–326. doi: 10.1037/h0023454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Urbain C., Poling A., Millam J., Thompson T. d-amphetamine and fixed-interval performance: effects of operant history. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):385–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. WEINER H. CONDITIONING HISTORY AND HUMAN FIXED-INTERVAL PERFORMANCE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7:383–385. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. WEINER H. Some effects of response cost upon human operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:201–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wanchisen B. A. Forgetting the lessons of history. Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;13(1):31–37. doi: 10.1007/BF03392515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wanchisen B. A., Tatham T. A., Mooney S. E. Variable-ratio conditioning history produces high- and low-rate fixed-interval performance in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):167–179. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Weiner H. Controlling human fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):349–373. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Woods T. S. On the alleged incompatibility of analysis: A response to Pierce and Epling. Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;3(2):67–69. doi: 10.1007/BF03391846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Behavior Analyst are provided here courtesy of Association for Behavior Analysis International

RESOURCES