Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2012 Nov;107(0 1):91–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04043.x

Effect of HCV status on liver enzymes in opioid-dependent pregnant women maintained on opioid-agonist medication

Laura F McNicholas 1, Amber M Holbrook 2, Kevin O’Grady 3, Hendrée E Jones 4, Mara G Coyle 5, Peter R Martin 6, Sarah H Heil 7, Susan M Stine 8, Karol Kaltenbach 9
PMCID: PMC4268861  NIHMSID: NIHMS647334  PMID: 23106931

Abstract

Aim

To examine hepatic enzyme test results throughout the course of pregnancy in women maintained on methadone or buprenorphine.

Design

Participants were randomized to either methadone or buprenorphine maintenance. Blood chemistry tests, including liver transaminases and HCV status, were determined every four weeks and once postpartum. As part of a planned secondary analysis, generalized mixed linear models were conducted with aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) as the dependent variables.

Setting

Six United States sites and one European site that provided comprehensive treatment to pregnant opioid-dependent women.

Participants

n = 175 opioid-dependent pregnant women enrolled in the Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental Research (MOTHER) study.

Findings

ALT, AST, and GGT levels decreased for all subjects across pregnancy trimesters, rising slightly postpartum. Hepatitis C (HCV)-positive subjects exhibited higher transaminases at all time points compared to HCV-negative subjects, regardless of medication condition. Both HCV-positive and negative buprenorphine-maintained participants exhibited lower GGT levels than those who were methadone-maintained.

Conclusions

Neither methadone nor buprenorphine appear to have adverse hepatic effects in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent women.

Keywords: tbc

Introduction

Clinical experience and research have demonstrated that maintenance with an opioid agonist is effective in treating the substance use disorder of opioid dependence. Methadone, a synthetic full mu-agonist medication, has been widely established as an effective treatment for opioid dependence, since the mid-1960’s. Furthermore, the National Institutes of Health have established methadone as the ‘gold standard’ for treating opioid-dependent patients during pregnancy [1].

In 2002, buprenorphine was approved by the FDA for the treatment of opioid dependence in non-pregnant patients and is considered a safe and effective medication [24]. Extensive clinical research in the U.S., including large-scale controlled trials involving more than 1000 patients, have shown that buprenorphine is safe and effective for treating opioid dependence in adults [23, 58]. As a semi-synthetic partial mu-agonist, buprenorphine may offer some potential advantages over methadone as a treatment for opioid dependence. From a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic standpoint, buprenorphine’s partial agonistic characteristics demonstrate an improved safety profile, in terms of respiratory depression and other toxic effects of full agonists. Further, its tight binding to and slow dissociation from opioid receptors permit a long duration of action and are thought to explain the relatively mild withdrawal syndrome noted with buprenorphine discontinuation [9]. Additionally, buprenorphine is available both within and outside (i.e. office-based prescription) Opioid Treatment Programs, making it accessible to a broader range of opioid-dependent individuals. Long-term methadone therapy has been well tolerated by patients with mild or moderate liver dysfunction and has no known hepatotoxic effects [10]. Treatment with buprenorphine also does not appear to increase liver enzyme levels in opioid-dependent non-pregnant patients without hepatitis [11]. However, concerns regarding potential hepatotoxicity were raised by case reports of acute hepatitis in patients treated for opioid dependence [12] and have led to the recommendation that all buprenorphine-treated patients have tests examining markers of liver function performed at treatment initiation and at intervals thereafter. Petry et al. [11] report that some individuals with hepatitis B or C infection who are treated with buprenorphine do experience increases in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The increases noted were small, and it was unclear if they resulted from buprenorphine treatment or hepatitis infection, as most patients in the sample were hepatitis C (HCV) positive. Berson et al. [13] also describe 4 cases of hepatitis contracted following intravenous buprenorphine misuse in heroin-dependent individuals, but state that this is a “most uncommon complication even after intravenous misuse, considering the large number of patients (about 65,000) placed on buprenorphine treatment, and the likelihood that a certain number may misuse and inject it intravenously”. Zuin et al. [14] also published a case report of one patient, who was Hepatitis C positive, with acute liver and kidney failure on therapeutic doses of buprenorphine. Berson et al. [15] further showed in rat hepatic microsomes and mitochondria that the hepatotoxicity of high doses of buprenorphine is related to its impairment of mitochondrial respiration, at concentrations very unlikely to be achieved at clinical sublingual doses.

Overall, the literature has few reports of buprenorphine treatment and hepatic injury or dysfunction in opioid-dependent individuals but the question of whether buprenorphine may exacerbate existing liver disease remains a question for study. This is especially salient as the rates for HCV infection reported in the current literature for heroin-using and methadone-maintained populations are as high as 70–90% for injecting drug users [1617]. Studies focusing on pregnant opioid-dependent women receiving substance abuse treatment report rates of HCV from 11–93% [1822]. While efforts were made during the early clinical trials of opioid maintenance medications to include female participants, the study populations were overwhelmingly male. In uncomplicated non-opioid-exposed pregnancies, liver enzymes, including AST, ALT, and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) do not show much variation from normal, but it is not known whether opioid agonist medication, HCV exposure, or both have an effect on liver enzymes in pregnant opioid-dependent women [2324]. The MOTHER study, a randomized clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy and safety of methadone and buprenorphine in pregnant opioid-dependent women, offers a unique opportunity to examine the effects of both medications on liver enzymes, in pregnant women who are maintained on opioid agonist medication. The purpose of the present study is to examine hepatic enzymes throughout the course of pregnancy in HCV-positive and HCV-negative women maintained on methadone or buprenorphine.

Methods

This study is a secondary analysis of Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental Research (MOTHER) medical and pregnancy and postpartum data. The MOTHER study is a multi-site double-blind, double-dummy randomized clinical trial to compare the relative effectiveness of methadone versus buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence during pregnancy. Primary and key secondary outcomes have been reported elsewhere [25]. A voucher incentive program was administered as part of the protocol and was effective in minimizing concomitant drug and alcohol use, allowing for clearer analysis of the pharmacotherapeutic effects of methadone and buprenorphine.

Participants

Data were obtained from the 175 opioid-dependent pregnant women who were randomized to either methadone or buprenorphine maintenance in the MOTHER protocol (methadone n = 89, buprenorphine n = 86). Participants were between the ages of 18 and 41years old, carried a singleton pregnancy and were randomized between 6 and 30 weeks estimated gestational age (EGA) as confirmed by ultrasound. Exclusion criteria included current benzodiazepine or alcohol abuse or dependence as defined by the Structured Clinical Interview of the DSM-IV (SCID) module E, HIV seropositivity, impending incarceration, non-English-speaking (non-German-speaking at the Vienna site), or a medical or psychiatric condition contraindicating study participation as determined by the medically responsible investigator. Participants were not excluded due to elevated transaminase levels. Three participants were excluded from this analysis due to missing lab values, resulting in a total of 172 participants. See Jones et al. for a detailed description of participant selection [25].

Procedures

Blood chemistry tests including liver enzymes, and HCV status were conducted at enrollment and every four weeks during pregnancy and once postpartum, 2–6 weeks following delivery.

Data Analysis

A total of 402 observations from 172 study participants were utilized in the analyses. A potential 788 data points were reduced to 402 observations (methadone n = 216, buprenorphine n = 186) by taking arithmetic means of the three trimesters (first trimester 1–12 weeks, n = 26; second trimester 13–26 weeks, n = 143; third trimester 27–40 weeks, n = 133; and the postpartum period, n=100). Three generalized linear mixed models were fitted with dependent variables ALT, AST, and GGT levels. Models included fixed effects of medication condition (methadone or buprenorphine maintenance), hepatitis C infection status, pregnancy trimester, and their interactions. Participant was included in the models as a random effect. Average AST, ALT, and GGT levels were taken across pregnancy trimester (1–12, 13–26, 27–40 weeks estimated gestational age), and once at 2–6 weeks postpartum. A log link function was utilized, assuming a Poisson distribution and a Huynh-Feldt form error structure.

Results

Of the sample, 38.4% of the participants tested positive for HCV (methadone n = 36, buprenorphine n = 30). All HCV-positive participants tested positive for HCV infection at screening, with the exception of one participant who converted to HCV positive status during study participation in the third trimester. Fifty-three percent of the participants were injection drug users (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic and health characteristics of the total sample (n = 172)

Variable Mean (SD) Percent
Age 27.3 (5.9)
EGA week at study entry 17.2 (6.1)
HCV positive status 38.4%
Injection drug use at study entry 53.1%

AST, ALT, and GGT level means are displayed by trimester in Table 2. Thirteen participants (7.6%; methadone n = 8; buprenorphine n = 5) had at least one lab value three times the upper limit of normal (ALT = 120, AST = 105, or GGT = 180). AST and ALT levels were significantly higher in the postpartum period than in either the second (ALT: t(276) = −3.7, P = 0.0002; AST: t(271) = −3.2, P = 0.0017) or third trimesters (ALT: t(251) = −4.4, P = 0.0001; AST: t(230) = −3.0, P = 0.0034) of pregnancy. ALT levels were also higher in the first versus third trimester of pregnancy (t(274)=2.2; P < 0.05). First trimester GGT levels were significantly higher than in subsequent trimesters or the postpartum period, displaying a decreasing trend over the course of pregnancy; P < 0.001 for second (t(245)=3.5; P = 0.0003) and third trimesters (t(280)=3.8; P = 0.0002). However, levels of GGT appear to increase again in the postpartum period, with GGT being significantly higher postpartum than in the third trimester (t(194)=−2.9; P = 0.005).

Table 2.

Means of total sample for AST, ALT, and GGT levels by trimester (n = 172)

Trimester AST ALT GGT
Observations Mean (SE) CI Mean (SE) CI Mean (SE) CI
1st 26 31.9 (4.6) 24.1–42.3 34.4 (5.7) 24.8–47.8 30.5 (4.5) 22.8–40.8
2nd 143 25.9 (1.7) 22.8–29.6 24.7 (2.0) 21.1–28.9 17.2 (1.6) 14.3–20.8
3rd 133 26.5 (1.7) 23.4–30.0 23.0 (2.2) 19.1–27.8 16.9 (1.7) 13.9–20.1
PP 100 32.7 (1.7) 29.4–36.3 35.5 (2.8) 30.3–41.6 21.5 (2.3) 17.4–26.4

Notes: PP = postpartum; Normal range ALT: 0–40 IU/L, AST: 5–35 IU/L, GGT: 0–60 IU/L

Participants who were positive for HCV infection had higher ALT, AST, and GGT levels at all time points, and it was found that trimester modified the effect of HCV, with HCV-positive subjects having higher transaminases in the first (F(1,225) = 15.9, P = 0.0001) and third trimesters (F(1,209) = 5.2, P = 0.02), and a trend toward significance for the second trimester (F(1,212) = 3.1, P = 0.08). Figures 1 and 2 show the mean ALT, AST, and GGT levels by HCV infection status over the course of pregnancy, for buprenorphine and methadone, respectively. Overall, HCV-positive participants exhibited higher ALT, AST, and GGT levels at each time point, with levels being twice as high as HCV-negative patients in the first trimester. Levels for ALT, AST, and GGT decreased over the second and third trimesters for both HCV-positive and negative patients, increasing in the postpartum period. HCV-positive patients showed a more marked decrease in the second and third trimesters, compared to HCV-negative patients.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Means by HCV status across trimesters: HCV positive (n=66)

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Means by HCV Status across trimesters: HCV negative (n= 106)

Medication condition (whether a participant was randomized to maintenance with buprenorphine or methadone) significantly affected GGT levels (F(1,183) = 8.1, P = 0.005), with methadone-maintained patients exhibiting higher GGT levels than buprenorphine-maintained patients. Medication condition did not influence ALT or AST levels (ALT: F(1,206) = 0.1, P= 0.8; AST: F(1,193) = 0.2, P = 0.7). The interaction term between medication condition and HCV infection status was not significant for ALT, AST, or GGT levels (Table 3), indicating that the maintenance medication did not significantly differentially affect liver enzyme levels according to HCV positive or negative status. The interaction term between medication and pregnancy trimester was also non-significant for ALT, AST, and GGT levels, suggesting that the effects of medication condition do not differ according to trimester (Table 3).

Table 3.

Tests of significance for fixed effects (n = 172)

Effect AST ALT GGT
(df) F P (df) F P (df) F P
Medication (1, 193) 0.18 0.7 (1, 206) 0.09 0.8 (1, 183) 8.1 0.005
HCV (1, 209) 46.6 0.001 (1, 221) 57.9 0.001 (1, 229) 10.9 0.001
Trimester (3, 274) 4.4 0.005 (3, 268) 7.9 0.001 (3, 235) 7.5 0.001
Medication x HCV (1, 209) 0.4 0.5 (1, 221) 0.5 0.5 (1, 229) 2.4 0.1
Medication x Trimester (3, 274) 1.7 0.2 (3, 268) 1.2 0.3 (3, 235) 1.7 0.2
HCV x Trimester (3, 274) 0.7 0.5 (3, 268) 0.5 0.7 (3, 236) 3.4 0.02
Medication x HCV x Trimester (3, 274) 1.3 0.3 (3, 268) 0.6 0.6 (3, 236) 0.6 0.6

Note: Medication: randomization to either methadone or buprenorphine maintenance

Discussion

In this analysis of the MOTHER data, we examined the transaminases ALT, AST, and GGT, as these enzymes have been considered surrogate measures of liver inflammation and/or injury when patients are treated with buprenorphine. Further, we compare effects of the two most commonly used medications for treating opioid dependence on these enzymatic markers of liver function in a specialized population of HCV-positive and HCV-negative pregnant opioid-dependent women.

The effect of opioid dependence on surrogate liver function tests in pregnancy is not a well-studied topic. In healthy uncomplicated pregnancies, the transaminases ALT and AST are generally unaffected or slightly lower compared to non-pregnant values [2324] and are normally less than 40 IU/L. During the course of pregnancy, transaminase levels may decrease somewhat. The literature is less definitive for GGT, but it appears that levels are generally below 50 IU/L in healthy pregnancies [24]. The only hepatic enzyme noted to increase during the course of normal pregnancy is alkaline phosphatase, which is not specific to the liver as it is produced in other organs as well [23].

Mean hepatic transaminases values were within normal limits in the first trimester and remained so throughout the pregnancy and the postpartum period for the total sample. The level of GGT significantly decreased during the course of the pregnancy and all three transaminases appeared to increase slightly during the postpartum period, while remaining within the clinically normal range.

Patients who have been exposed to HCV are more likely to have, at least intermittently, elevated transaminase levels. Approximately one-third of the study population was HCV-positive, and these patients had significantly higher transaminase levels across all three trimesters and postpartum, irrespective of medication group, when compared to HCV-negative patients. Although the participants who were HCV-positive had higher transaminase levels, they appeared to trend toward normal during the course of pregnancy with both methadone and buprenorphine maintenance suggesting that neither drug appeared to have a deleterious effect on liver enzymes. However, participants treated with buprenorphine were more likely to have lower GGT levels than those treated with methadone, whether they were HCV positive or negative. HCV-negative participants had normal transaminase levels throughout - pregnancy and in the postpartum period, regardless of whether medicated with methadone or buprenorphine, again supporting the safety of both opioid therapies from a hepatic standpoint.

These results are not consistent with the findings of Petry et al. (2000) where increases in both AST and ALT were noted after buprenorphine exposure; GGT was not analyzed in the Petry study [12]. There are several reasons why these data may differ from previous findings. The Petry et al. sample was primarily male with an average age of 42 compared to an average age of 27 in our sample of pregnant women. Additionally, the majority of the Petry et al. sample was HCV-positive, while only one-third of our participants were positive for HCV, potentially due to the number of participants in our sample who abused prescription opioids prior to study entry, and were not injection drug users. The lower average age and prevalence of HCV infection as well as the fact that the subjects were pregnant in our study relative to the Petry et al. sample may indicate pre-existing differences in the general health of the liver between the two study populations.

Although this study is limited by sample size and numbers of observations, these data indicate that pregnant, opioid-dependent women treated with buprenorphine or methadone do not exhibit liver toxicity or exacerbation of underlying liver disease (HCV). In fact, it appears that as pregnancy progressed, both medications were associated with a reduction of serum hepatic enzymes. Such a reduction in transaminases could be due to the effects of reduced drug and/or alcohol use in the context of the opioid agonist treatment and voucher incentive program available in this study, as well as the normal effect of pregnancy on the enzyme levels.

While our data demonstrate that there are no detrimental hepatic effects of either buprenorphine or methadone, there are limitations to this study. First, a voucher incentive program was utilized very effectively to reduce the use of all illicit drugs, limiting our ability to generalize about the effects of either medication in a population with ongoing substance abuse. Second, women diagnosed with alcohol or benzodiazepine abuse or dependence were excluded from the study, but there was sporadic use of these drugs of abuse. The combination of HCV infection and alcohol abuse is highly detrimental to the liver. It is not known if buprenorphine or methadone would be differentially beneficial or toxic in cases of HCV infection and ongoing alcohol abuse, or if use of either medication would exacerbate the underlying liver disease. Further research is needed to provide additional data on the effects of buprenorphine and methadone on liver enzymes in pregnant and non-pregnant women who are opioid-dependent. However, this study provides further information on the safety of both methadone and buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence in pregnancy.

Acknowledgments

The work presented here was supported by the following grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse: Brown University (R01 DA015778); Johns Hopkins University (R01 DA015764); Thomas Jefferson University (R01 DA015738); University of Vermont (R01 DA018410 and M01 RR109); University of Vienna (R01 DA018417); Vanderbilt University (R01 DA 017513 and UL1 RR024975), and Wayne State University (R01 DA15832).

Footnotes

Declaration of interests:

The clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT00271219; Title: RCT Comparing Methadone and Buprenorphine in Pregnant Women

H.J. discloses that she has received reimbursement for time and travel from Reckitt Benckiser.

KEO’G discloses that he has received reimbursement for time from Reckitt Benckiser.

Contributor Information

Laura F. McNicholas, Department of Veterans Affairs, Philadelphia, VA Medical Center and the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Amber M. Holbrook, Department of Pediatrics, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University

Kevin O’Grady, Department of Psychology, University of Maryland

Hendrée E. Jones, Department of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Mara G. Coyle, Department of Pediatrics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Peter R. Martin, Vanderbilt Addiction Center, Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

Sarah H. Heil, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Vermont

Susan M. Stine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavior Neurosciences, Wayne State University

Karol Kaltenbach, Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University

References

  • 1.National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. Effective medical treatment of opiate addiction. JAMA. 1998;280:1936–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnson RE, Jaffe JH, Fudala PJ. A controlled trial of buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence. JAMA. 1992;267:2750–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ling W, Charuvastra C, Collins JF, Batki S, Brown LS, Kintaudi P, et al. Buprenorphine maintenance treatment of opiate dependence: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Addiction. 1998;93:475–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9344753.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mattick RP, Ali R, White JM, O’Brien S, Wolk S, Danz C. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients. Addiction. 2003;98:441–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00335.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Strain EC, Stitzer ML, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE. Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opiate dependence. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1025–30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.7.1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Strain EC, Stitzer ML, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: Self reports, urinalysis, and addiction severity index. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996;16:58–67. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199602000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnson RE, Chutuape MA, Strain EC, Walsh SL, Stitzer M, Bigelow GE. A comparison of levomethadyl acetate, buprenorphine, and methadone for opioid dependence. N Eng J Med. 2000;343:1290–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011023431802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fudala PJ, Bridge TP, Herbert S, Williford WO, Chiang CN, Jones K, et al. Office-based treatment of opiate addiction with a sublingual-tablet formulation of buprenorphine and naloxone. N Eng J Med. 2003;349:949–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jasinski DR, Pevnick JS, Griffith JD. Human pharmacology and abuse potential of the analgesic buprenorphine. A potential agent for treating narcotic addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;35:501–16. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280111012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Novick DM, Kreek MJ, Fanizza AM, Yancovitz SR, Gelb AM, Stenger RJ. Methadone disposition in patients with chronic liver disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30:353–62. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Petry NM, Bickel WK, Piasecki D, Marsch LA, Badger GJ. Elevated liver enzyme levels in opioid-dependent patients with hepatitis treated with buprenorphine. Am J Addict. 2000;9:265–9. doi: 10.1080/10550490050148099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Herve S, Riachi G, Guillement N, Tanasescu S, Goria O, Thuillez C, et al. Acute hepatitis due to buprenorphine administration. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:1033–7. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200410000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Berson A, Gervais A, Cazals D, Boyer N, Durand F, Bernuau J, et al. Hepatitis after intravenous buprenorphine misuse in heroin addicts. J Hepatol. 2001a;34:346–50. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)00049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zuin M, Giorgini A, Selmi C, Battezzati PM, Cocchi CA, Crosignani A, et al. Acute liver and renal failure during treatment with buprenorphine at therpeutic dose. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2008;41:e8–e10. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berson A, Fau D, Fornacciari R, Degove-Goddard P, Sutton A, Descatoire V, et al. Mechanisms for experimental buprenorphine hepatotoxicity: major role of mitochondrial dysfunction versus metabolic activation. J Hepatol. 2001b;34:261–9. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)00050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Abraham H, Degli-Esposti S, Marino L. Seroprevalence of hepatitis C in a sample of middle class substance abusers. J Addict Dis. 1999;18:77–87. doi: 10.1300/J069v18n04_07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rosenblum A, Nuttbrock L, McQuistion HL, Mugaru S, Joseph H. Hepatitis C and substance use in a sample of homeless people in New York City. J Addict Dis. 2001;20:15–25. doi: 10.1300/j069v20n04_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fajemirokun-Odudeyi O, Sinha C, Tutty S, Pairaudeau P, Armstrong D, Phillips T, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women who use opiates. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;126:170–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ludlow JP, Evans SF, Hulse G. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies associated with illicit substance abuse. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;44:302–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kakko J, Heilig M, Sarman I. Buprenorphine and methadone treatment of opiate dependence during pregnancy: comparison of fetal growth and neonatal outcomes in two consecutive case series. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;96:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fischer G, Ortner R, Rohrmeister K, Jagsch R, Baewert A, Langer M, et al. Methadone versus buprenorphine in pregnant addicts: a double-blind, double-dummy comparison study. Addiction. 2006;101:275–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jones HE, Johnson RE, Jasinski DR, O’Grady KE, Chisholm CA, Choo RE, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone in the treatment of pregnant opioid-dependent patients: effects on the neonatal abstinence syndrome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gabbe SG, Neibyl JR, Simpson JL. Obstetrics: Normal and problem pregnancies. 3. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom S, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, et al. Obstetrics. 23. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jones H, Kaltenbach K, Heil S, Stine S, Coyle M, Arria A, et al. Neonatal abstinence syndrome following methadone or buprenorphine exposure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2320–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jones HE, Fischer G, Heil SH, Kaltenbach K, Martin PR, Coyle MG, et al. Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental Research (MOTHER): Approach, issues, and lessons learned. Addiction. 2011 doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04036.x. (Supplement Submission) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES