Skip to main content
The Indian Journal of Surgery logoLink to The Indian Journal of Surgery
. 2008 Jul 24;70(3):125–129. doi: 10.1007/s12262-008-0035-7

A one year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults

Sanjot B Kurane 1,, M S Sangolli 1, A S Gogate 1
PMCID: PMC3452451  PMID: 23133039

Abstract

Objectives

To compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in co-relation to histopathology report for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Methodology

A prospective study of the patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis at K.L.E.S. Hospital and M.R.C. Belgaum. The clinical, radiological and ultrasonogrpahic data of 60 patients with suspected appendicits was collected. These patients were evaluated by modified Alvarado here and ultrasonographically, which was correlated with histopatholocial finding.

Results

Out of 60 patients, 38.33% had acute appendicitis. 40% had modified Alvarado score ≥ 7 and 38.33% patients were ultrasonographically positive. In the present study, modified Alvarado score has sensitivity of 78.26%, specificity 83.78%, positive predictive value 75.00%, negative predictive value 86.11%, diagnostic accuracy 81.00% false positive error rate 16.22% and false negative error rate 21.74%. Ultrasonography had sensitivity of 82.61%, specificity of 89.19%, positive predictive value of 82.61, negative predictive value of 89.19.Diagnostic accuracy of 86.67%, false positive error rate of 10.81%, false negative error rate of 17.39%. When modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography were positive, 17 true positive cases and no false positive cases. The false negative cases in modified Alvarado score were five. When it was combined with ultrasonography the false negative cases reduced to two that is 60% reduction in false negative cases.

Conclusions

Modified Alvarado score is useful tool in clinical decision making. When compared with ultrasonography neither one is advantageous. However, additional information provided by ultrasonography improves diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: Modified Alvarado Score, Ultrasonography, Acute Appendicitis

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (647.1 KB).

References

  • 1.Hoffmann J., Rasmussen O.O. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1989;76:7749. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800760803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jones P.F. Active observation in the management of acute abdominal pain in childhood. Br J Surg. 1976;ii:551–553. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6035.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Denizbasi A., Unluer E.E. The role of the emergency medicine resident using the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the general surgery resident. European Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2003;10:296–301. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200312000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Puylaert J.B.C.M. Acute Appendicitis: Ultrasound sonography evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986;158:35–60. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.2934762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jaffrey R.B., Laing F.C., Lewis F.R. Acute appendicitis high resolution real time ultrasound findings. Radiology. 1987;163:11–14. doi: 10.1148/radiology.163.1.3547490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kalen M., Rich A.J., Talbot D.R., Canlitie W.J. Evaluation of modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:418–419. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Douglas C.D., Macpherson N.E., Davidson P.M., Gani J.S. Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis incorporating the Alvarado score. Br J Surg. 2000;321:1–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7266.919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Abu-Yousef M.M., Bleacher J.J., Macer J., Ordinate L.F., Franked A., Metcalfe A.M. High resolution sonography of acute appendicitis. AJR. 1987;149:53–8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.149.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yascoe M.E., Jeffrey B. Sonography of appendicitis and diverticulities. Radiol Clin North Am. 1994;32:899–921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bhattacharjee P.K., Chowdhary T., Roy D. Prospective evaluation of modified Alvarado score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis. JIMA. 2002;100(8):310–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Al-Hashemy A.M., Seleem M.I. Appraisal of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in adults. Saudi Med J. 2004;25(9):1229–1231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sooriakumaran P., Lovell D., Brown R. A comparison of clinical judgment Vs the modified Alvarado score in acute appendicitis. International Journal of Surgery. 2005;3:59–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Skaane P., Amland P.F., Nordshus T., Solheim K. Ultrasonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. A prospective study. Br J Radiol. 1990;63:787–793. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-63-754-787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tarjan Z., Mako E., Winternitz T., Kiss I., Kalman A. The value of ultrasonic diagnosis in acute appendicitis. Orv Hetil. 1995;136:713–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ida C., Simon G., Graham B. M. Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting Appendicitis in a community Hospital. AJR. 2005;184:1809–1812. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Indian Journal of Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES