Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1987 Feb;51(2):297–311. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(87)83336-2

How pore mouth charge distributions alter the permeability of transmembrane ionic channels.

P C Jordan
PMCID: PMC1329891  PMID: 2435331

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects that surface dipole layers and surface charge layers along the pore mouth-water interface can have on the electrical properties of a transmembrane channel. Three specific molecular sources are considered: dipole layers formed by membrane phospholipids, dipole layers lining the mouth of a channel-forming protein, and charged groups in the mouth of a channel-forming protein. We find, consistent with previous work, that changing the lipid-water potential difference only influences channel conduction if the rate-limiting step takes place well inside the channel constriction. We find that either mouth dipoles or mouth charges can act as powerful ion attractors increasing either cation or anion concentration near the channel entrance to many times its bulk value, especially at low ionic strengths. The effects are sufficient to reconcile the apparently contradictory properties of high selectivity and high conductivity, observed for a number of K+ channel systems. We find that localizing the electrical sources closer to the constriction entrance substantially increases their effectiveness as ion attractors; this phenomenon is especially marked for dipolar distributions. An approximate treatment of electrolyte shielding is used to discriminate between the various mechanisms for increasing ionic concentration near the constriction entrance. Dipolar potentials are far less sensitive to ionic strength variation than potentials due to fixed charges. We suggest that the K+ channel from sarcoplasmic reticulum does not have a fixed negative charge near the constriction entrance; we suggest further that the Ca+2-activated K+ channel from transverse tubule does have such a charge.

Full text

PDF
297

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen O. S., Finkelstein A., Katz I., Cass A. Effect of phloretin on the permeability of thin lipid membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Jun;67(6):749–771. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.6.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen O. S. Ion movement through gramicidin A channels. Studies on the diffusion-controlled association step. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):147–165. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84416-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberg E., Noda K., Gross E., Läuger P. Single-channel parameters of gramicidin A,B, and C. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Jan 21;419(2):223–228. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90348-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell J. E., Miller C. Effects of phospholipid surface charge on ion conduction in the K+ channel of sarcoplasmic reticulum. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):279–287. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84154-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Benz R., Fröhlich O., Läuger P., Montal M. Electrical capacity of black lipid films and of lipid bilayers made from monolayers. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jul 3;394(3):323–334. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(75)90287-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coronado R., Rosenberg R. L., Miller C. Ionic selectivity, saturation, and block in a K+-selective channel from sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Oct;76(4):425–446. doi: 10.1085/jgp.76.4.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Flewelling R. F., Hubbell W. L. The membrane dipole potential in a total membrane potential model. Applications to hydrophobic ion interactions with membranes. Biophys J. 1986 Feb;49(2):541–552. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83664-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heitz F., Gavach C., Trudelle Y. Single channels of various gramicidins: voltage effects. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):97–99. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84123-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heitz F., Spach G., Trudelle Y. Single channels of 9, 11, 13, 15-destryptophyl-phenylalanyl-gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1982 Oct;40(1):87–89. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84462-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hille B., Schwarz W. Potassium channels as multi-ion single-file pores. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Oct;72(4):409–442. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.4.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hol W. G. The role of the alpha-helix dipole in protein function and structure. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1985;45(3):149–195. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(85)90001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jordan P. C. Effect of pore structure on energy barriers and applied voltage profiles. I. Symmetrical channels. Biophys J. 1984 Jun;45(6):1091–1100. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84257-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jordan P. C. Electrostatic modeling of ion pores. Energy barriers and electric field profiles. Biophys J. 1982 Aug;39(2):157–164. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84503-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jordan P. C. Electrostatic modeling of ion pores. II. Effects attributable to the membrane dipole potential. Biophys J. 1983 Feb;41(2):189–195. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84419-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kistler J., Stroud R. M. Crystalline arrays of membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3678–3682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koeppe R. E., 2nd, Hodgson K. O., Stryer L. Helical channels in crystals of gramicidin A and of a cesium--gramicidin A complex: an x-ray diffraction study. J Mol Biol. 1978 May 5;121(1):41–54. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90261-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Latorre R., Vergara C., Hidalgo C. Reconstitution in planar lipid bilayers of a Ca2+-dependent K+ channel from transverse tubule membranes isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Feb;79(3):805–809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.3.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee W. K., Jordan P. C. Molecular dynamics simulation of cation motion in water-filled gramicidinlike pores. Biophys J. 1984 Dec;46(6):805–819. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84079-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Levitt D. G. Electrostatic calculations for an ion channel. I. Energy and potential profiles and interactions between ions. Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):209–219. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85485-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Levitt D. G. Strong electrolyte continuum theory solution for equilibrium profiles, diffusion limitation, and conductance in charged ion channels. Biophys J. 1985 Jul;48(1):19–31. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83757-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Läuger P. Diffusion-limited ion flow through pores. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Dec 2;455(2):493–509. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90320-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mackay D. H., Berens P. H., Wilson K. R., Hagler A. T. Structure and dynamics of ion transport through gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1984 Aug;46(2):229–248. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84016-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller C. Bis-quaternary ammonium blockers as structural probes of the sarcoplasmic reticulum K+ channel. J Gen Physiol. 1982 May;79(5):869–891. doi: 10.1085/jgp.79.5.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moczydlowski E., Alvarez O., Vergara C., Latorre R. Effect of phospholipid surface charge on the conductance and gating of a Ca2+-activated K+ channel in planar lipid bilayers. J Membr Biol. 1985;83(3):273–282. doi: 10.1007/BF01868701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Parsegian A. Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems. Nature. 1969 Mar 1;221(5183):844–846. doi: 10.1038/221844a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tredgold R. H., Hole P. N. Dielectric behaviour of dry synthetic polypeptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Aug 4;443(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90497-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Urry D. W., Alonso-Romanowski S., Venkatachalam C. M., Trapane T. L., Harris R. D., Prasad K. U. Shortened analog of the gramicidin A channel argues for the doubly occupied channel as the dominant conducting state. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Aug 8;775(1):115–119. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(84)90242-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Urry D. W. The gramicidin A transmembrane channel: a proposed pi(L,D) helix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Mar;68(3):672–676. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.3.672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vergara C., Moczydlowski E., Latorre R. Conduction, Blockade and Gating in a Ca -activated K Channel Incorporated into Planar Lipid Bilayers. Biophys J. 1984 Jan;45(1):73–76. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84114-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wada A., Nakamura H. Nature of the charge distribution in proteins. Nature. 1981 Oct 29;293(5835):757–758. doi: 10.1038/293757a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wada A. The alpha-helix as an electric macro-dipole. Adv Biophys. 1976:1–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wallace B. A. Structure of gramicidin A. Biophys J. 1986 Jan;49(1):295–306. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83642-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES