Skip to main content
Mycobiology logoLink to Mycobiology
. 2014 Jun 30;42(2):114–119. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2014.42.2.114

Re-evaluation of the Genus Antrodia (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) in Korea

Myung Soo Park 1, Ying Quan 1, Paul Eunil Jung 1, Seung-Yoon Oh 1, Yeongseon Jang 2, Jae-Jin Kim 2, Young Woon Lim 1,
PMCID: PMC4112226  PMID: 25071379

Abstract

The wood decay fungi Antrodia P. Karst. play important ecological roles and have significant industrial and economic impacts as both wood degraders and sources of pharmaceutical and biotechnological products. Although each Antrodia species has distinct morphological characteristics, the misidentification rate is especially high due to their simple morphological characters. A combination of morphological and internal transcribed spacer region sequence analyses revealed that 27 of 89 specimens previously identified by morphology alone were correct, whereas 35 of these specimens were misidentified as other Antrodia species. We report here that seven Antrodia species exist in Korea (A. albida, A. heteromorpha, A. malicola, A. serialis, A. sinuosa, A. sitchensis, and A. xantha) and based on these specimens, we provide taxonomic descriptions of these species, except for A. serialis, which was only confirmed by isolate.

Keywords: Antrodia, Biotechnological products, Fungal barcode, ITS, Wood decay fungus


Wood decay fungi of the genus Antrodia P. Karst (1880) are characterized by resupinate to effused-reflexed, mostly light-colored, and tough to hard basidiocarps and a white to pale cream pore surface. Microscopically, Antrodia display dimitic hyphal systems and smooth, cylindrical-ellipsoid and non-amyloid basidiospores [1]. Trametes serpens was chosen as a type species, which was subsequently amended as Antrodia albida (Fr.) Donk [2]. Antrodia has morphological characteristics that are similar to Antrodiella Ryvarden & Johans (1980) and Diplomitoporus Domański (1970), except rot type [1]. Recent studies have demonstrated a clear distinction in the phylogenetic position of the latter two genera from Antrodia [3, 4].

Because members of the genus Antrodia cause a brown rot that selectively degrades cellulose and hemicellulose, they influence forest structure and succession and carbon sequestration [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. They also significantly weaken wood and wood products, which reduces their commercial value [5, 10]. However, some of them also have economic value as good sources of pharmaceutical and biotechnological products [11, 12, 13].

Approximately 50 Antrodia species have been described worldwide [14], and to date, eight species have been reported in Korea: A. albida, A. crassa, A. heteromorpha, A. malicola, A. serialis, A. sinuosa, A. sitchensis, and A. xantha [15, 16]. A. sinuosa was the first species reported in Korea as synonym Poria vaporaria [17] and later amended as A. sinuosa [18]. A. albida, which was first reported as Trametes albida in the 1950s [19], was also amended as a member of the genus Antrodia in 1992 by Jung [18]. In 1994, Daedalea heteromorpha was amended as Antrodia heteromorpha, and two new species, A. crassa and A. serialis, were reported [20]. Since then, three more Antrodia species have been described in Korea: A. malicola [21], A. sitchensis [16], and A. xantha [22]. Among them, only A. sitchensis was described based on nuclear large subunit rDNA region sequence data and morphological data [16].

With the recent advances in sequencing technology, DNA-based methods for molecular phylogeny and species identification have become faster, cheaper, less labor intensive, and easier to perform, even for non-experts. Fungal molecular phylogeny is based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, which is a commonly used molecular marker for fungal phylogenetics and has been formally proposed as the primary fungal barcode gene [23]. Because numerous ITS region sequences are available in public nucleotide sequence databases like GenBank, the ITS region can be used to correctly identify fungi and investigate their phylogenetic relationships.

Although species delimitation of fungi based on morphology is useful, the misidentification rate of wood decay fungi is especially high due to their simple morphological characters. In this study, we clarified the status of Antrodia species in Korea based on ITS sequence analyses and morphological characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples and morphological analysis

Eighty-nine specimens kept in the Seoul National University Fungus Collection (SFC) and the Korea University Culture Collection (KUC) were analyzed in this study. They were originally identified as seven species; 81 specimens from SFC comprised six species (A. albida, A. heteromorpha, A. malicola, A. serialis, A. sinuosa, and A. xantha) and eight specimens from KUC comprised four species (A. albida, A. heteromorpha, A. malicola, and A. sitchensis). Measurements and drawings were made from slide preparations mounted in 3% KOH and 1% phloxine [24] by using a Nikon 80i light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). More than 20 basidiospores were measured to ascertain average dimensions. The quotient (Q) is the ratio of variation between the mean spore length and the mean spore width of the studied specimens. Species identification via classical methodology was achieved by macro- and micro-morphological observations using taxonomic guides [1, 25, 26].

DNA extraction, PCR, sequencing, and analysis

Tissues from fresh basidiocarps and herbarium materials were placed in 2× CTAB buffer. Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB extraction protocol [27]. The ITS region was amplified by PCR using primers ITS5 and ITS4b [28, 29]. Each reaction was performed on a C1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using AmpONE Taq premix (GeneAll Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea) in a final volume of 20 µL containing 10 pmol of each primer and 1 µL of DNA template. PCR amplification was performed as described by Park et al. [30]. The PCR products were electrophoresed in a 1% agarose gel, and then stained with loading STAR (Dyne Bio, Seoul, Korea) and purified using the Expin PCR Purification Kit (GeneAll Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the DNA Synthesis and Sequencing Facility at Macrogen (Seoul, Korea) with an ABI3700 automated DNA sequencer.

Sequences were assembled, proofread, and edited using MEGA 5 [31]. Representative sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession Nos. are shown in Fig. 1). The sequences obtained in this study were compared to the reference sequences in GenBank using BLAST. Multiple alignments were performed using the default settings of MAFFT v7 [32]. DNA alignments were checked by eye, and ambiguously aligned positions were manually adjusted. The sequence of Sparassis brevipes Krombh. (AY218441) was used as an outgroup based on a previous study [33]. A neighbor joining tree was constructed with MEGA 5 [31] using the Kimura 2-parameter model [34]. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1,000 replications for branch stability.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Neighbor joining tree inferred from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of seven Korean Antrodia species. Bootstrap value is presented on the line. The accession numbers of the representative specimens are marked with asterisks. The numbers shown in parentheses (A : B : C) indicate the number of specimens from the original morphological identification as stored in SFC (A), the number of correctly identified samples among herbarium specimens (B), the number of specimens after rearrangement according to the morphological and molecular analyses in this study (C). A. serialis (KUC8002) is the isolate obtained from wood products.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Re-evaluation of Antrodia species in Korea

The specimens selected for this study were collected from different geographic locations in Korea and were initially identified by morphological methods as follows: A. albida (27 specimens), A. heteromorpha (18), A. malicola (29), A. serialis (9), A. sinuosa (4), A. sitchensis (1), and A. xantha (1) (Fig. 2). We determined their identity by combining morphological observations of the macro- and microscopic features with molecular analyses of their ITS sequences. The ITS sequencing and morphological characteristic analyses revealed that seven Antrodia species exist in Korea. Although A. sitchensis (KUC20090711-32) was closely related to Oligoporus placentus in the ITS tree, its dimitic hyphal system was distinguished from the monomitic hyphal system of O. placentus [1].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Basidiocarps and microscopic features of Antrodia albida (A), A. heteromorpha (B), A. malicola (C), A. sinuosa (D), A. sitchensis (E), and A. xantha (F). The microscopic features, the basidiospores, basidia, generative hyphae with clamp connection, and skeletal hyphae are shown from the top. The scale bar is 5 mm in the basidiocarp images and 10 µm in the microscopic images.

Since the Antrodia have been regarded as a heterogeneous and polyphyletic group, segregation of Antrodia s. l. into three genera (Antrodia s. s., Amyloporia Singer, and Fibroporia Parmasto) has been proposed [14, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. Fibroporia has a rhizomorphic margin as a diagnostic characteristic [35], and its separation is well supported by molecular analysis [41]. Amyloporia is distinguished by amyloid skeletal hyphae [42], and it has a paraphyletic relationship [38]. Although Fibroporia have not been reported in Korea, three species that have been proposed for the genus Amyloporia, A. sinuosa, A. sitchensis, and A. xantha [33], are included in this study. We decided to leave these species in the genus Antrodia because of the paraphyletic relationship in the proposed genus [38].

In this study, we verified six Antrodia species among the 89 specimens. Twenty-seven of the specimens (approximately 30%) were correctly identified. Among the misidentified specimens, 35 were Antrodia; however, the species identification was incorrect. Twenty-seven specimens were identified as other genera such as Trametopsis cervina, Perenniporia subacida, and Schizopora paradoxa. Nine specimens that were initially identified as A. serialis were confirmed as other species, such as A. albida, A. heteromorpha, A. sinuosa, Cinereomyces lindbladii, Perenniporia subacida, Schizopora paradoxa, and two unidentified polypores. The specimen (SFC19910816-31) that was used for the original description of A. serialis in Korea [20] was lost from SFC. The existence of A. serialis in Korea was proved by an isolate that was obtained from playground wood products [43]. Among the four specimens of A. sinuosa, two were amended as A. xantha and Trametes hirsuta, and two were unidentified. One specimen (SFC20120601-10) originally recorded as A. serialis, was identified as A. sinuosa.

Antrodia crassa was only reported once in Korea at Mt. Sobaek National Park in 1994 [20]. However, the specimen was severely damaged by mold; therefore, we could not verify its identity. Although A. crassa has been known to be distributed in coniferous forests and to inhabit gymnosperms [1], according to the description, the Korean specimen was collected from a deciduous tree [20]. Therefore, further investigations in coniferous forests are required to confirm whether A. crassa exists in Korea or not. We report here that seven Antrodia species exist in Korea, and provide taxonomic descriptions based on the specimens, expect for A. serialis, which was only confirmed by one isolate.

Taxonomy

Antrodia albida (Fr.) Donk, Persoonia 4: 339 (1966) [2]

Basidiocarps annual, resupinate, effused to reflexed, imbricate growing on a vertical surface, up to 4.5 mm thick at the base, margin sharp; upper surface white to cream colored, smooth, first matted and adpressed velutinate, becoming glabrous in zones with age; context tough and corky, 0.3~0.5 mm thick at the base; hymenophore white to cream or yellowish in old specimens, pores round to angular, 1~2 per mm, radially elongate, sinuous and semilamellate on vertical substrates, slightly dentate, tube length, 2~4 mm at the base. Hyphal system dimitic; generative hyphae with clamps, moderately branched, 2.5~5 µm thick; skeletal hyphae dominating in context and the pileus surface, hyaline, thick-walled to solid, 2~3 µm thick. Basidia narrowly clavate, 34~45 × 6.2~9.2 µm. Basidiospores oblong elliptical, thin-walled, smooth, hyaline, 8.5~9.7 × 4~5.2 µm, Q = 1.83~2.42.

Specimens examined

KUC20121109-21, KUC20121123-21, SFC19990326-20, SFC19990326-31, SFC19990326-35, SFC19990326-36, SFC19990521-16, SFC20000922-01, SFC20021010-03, SFC20021011-21, SFC20021107-01, SFC20021123-02, SFC20030419-24, SFC20030827-01, SFC20030921-14, SFC20040512-04, SFC20040527-12, SFC20040923-42, SFC20050526-21, SFC20050609-48, SFC20110429-26, SFC20110519-32, SFC20111029-02, SFC20120409-02, SFC20120409-31, SFC20121009-24, SFC20130314-13, SFC20130315-33, SFC20130403-36, and SFC20130507-05.

Remarks

This species is commonly found on oak trees and is characterized by the white surface of the basidiocarp and a hymenophore with pores or a mixture of pores and lamellate. This taxon is often confused with Trametopsis cervina, which is separated from A. albida by the upper surface of the basidiocarp, which is hirsute to strigose and a pinkish buff to cinnamon in color, and short basidia (20~25 × 5~7 µm) [44].

Antrodia heteromorpha (Fr.) Donk, Persoonia 4: 339 (1966) [2]

Basidiocarps annual, resupinate to semipileate growing on a sloped surface, tightly attached to the substrate; pileus protrudes 1.4 cm, margin distinctly bounded; upper surface creamy to beige colored, smooth; context soft or corky and thin; hymenophore cream or pale brown, pores round to angular, with lacerate pore mouths, 1~2 per mm, elongate, daedaleoid on vertical surface, tube length 3~8mm. Hyphal system dimitic; generative hyphae with clamps, 2~3 µm thick; skeletal hyphae hyaline, thick-walled, 5~6 µm thick. Basidia clavate, 42~61 × 8.5~12.5 µm. Basidiospores oblong elliptical, thin-walled, smooth, hyaline, 10.8~14.8 × 5.7~7.4 µm, Q = 1.7~1.95.

Specimens examined

KUC20080726-41, KUC20110922-38, KUC20120717-33, SFC19900807-01, SFC19971008-07, SFC19980411-13, SFC19981217-24, SFC19991219-07, SFC19991219-19, SFC20030419-12, SFC20030613-30, SFC20030928-19, SFC20040525-35, SFC20040525-42, SFC20050609-05, SFC20120323-02, SFC20120508-06, SFC20120915-03, SFC20120919-70, SFC20121010-40, SFC20130313-02, SFC20130403-16, SFC20130404-07, SFC20130506-08, and SFC20130521-41.

Remarks

This species is characterized by a thick resupinate hymenophore with large lacerate pores tightly attached to the substrates, often found on oak trees and large basidiospores (10.8~14.8 × 5.7~7.4 µm).

A. malicola (Berk. & M. A. Curtis) Donk, Persoonia 4: 339 (1966) [2]

Basidiocarps annual, resupinate, effused to reflexed, semipileate growing on a sloped surface projecting up to 1 cm on and up to 5 mm thick at the base, margin sharp; upper surface cream to buff colored, smooth; context corky, buff, 0.5~1 mm thick; hymenophore cream to buff, pores round, elongate on vertical surface, 2~3 per mm, tubes up to 4 mm long. Hyphal system dimitic; generative hyphae with clamps, 2~3 µm thick; skeletal hyphae hyaline, thick-walled, 2~4 µm thick. Basidia clavate, 25~31 × 5.7~6.8 µm. Basidiospores cylindrical, smooth, 7.8~9.2 × 3~4 µm, Q = 2.44~2.86.

Specimens examined

KUC20110916-19 and KUC20111007-03.

Remarks

Buff color basidiocarp, round pores, and short basidia can separate this species from A. albida, which has white basidiocarps and a pore surface with mixed round and lamellate pores.

A. sinuosa (Fr.) P. Karsten, Medd. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 6: 10 (1881) [45]

Basidiocarps annual, resupinate, becoming effused; margin cream color to light buff, distinctly bounded; hymenophore cream-colored, buffy brown when dried, pores angular, sinuous, 3~5 per mm, with thin dissepiments. Hyphal system dimitic; generating a hyaline hyphae, thin-walled, with clamps, 2.2~2.8 µm thick; skeletal hyphae hyaline, thick-walled, non-septate, 2.5~3 µm thick. Basidia clavate, 14~15 × 2.8~4.5 µm. Basidiospores cylindrical to allantoid, hyaline, smooth, 5.1~5.7 × 1.4~1.7 µm, Q = 3.05~4.12.

Specimen examined

SFC20120601-10.

Remarks

This species was detected only on a conifer tree. It may be confused with other morphologically similar species that grow on conifer trees, such as A. xantha, which has smaller pores and Basidiospores, or with Schizopora flavipora, which has white, sterile, and fimbriate margins and tramal hyphal ends with spherical swellings.

Antrodia sitchensis (D. V. Baxter) Gilb. & Ryv., Mycotaxon 22: 363 (1985) [46]

Basidiocarps resupinate, confluent; context thin, white to cream; hymenophore cream when fresh, light brown when old, pores round, elongated on vertical surface, 3~5 per mm. Hyphal system dimitic, generative hyphae with clamps, thinwalled and 3.8~4.5 µm thick, skeletal hyphae, predominant, thick-walled, 2.85~5.5 µm thick, drops of resinous substances commonly present in microscopic preparations. Basidia two to four sterigmata, clavate, 18~26 × 5.14~7.1 µm. Basidiospores cylindrical, smooth and thin walled, hyaline, 4.5~5.7 × 1.6~2.1 µm, Q = 2.44~2.86.

Specimen examined

KUC20090711-32.

Remarks

A. sitchensis may be confused with A. sinuosa; however, the former has larger basidia (18~26 × 5.14~7.1 µm) and does not crack at senescence.

Antrodia xantha (Fr.) Ryvarden, Nor. J. Bot. 20: 8 (1973) [47]

Basidiocarps annual, resupinate, widely effused, narrow semipilei on vertical surfaces, adnate, up to 1 mm thick, soft when fresh, chalky when dry, margin narrow; context thin and white; hymenophore white when fresh, fading to light buff, pores round and 7~8 per mm. Hyphal system dimitic; generative hyphae clamped, thin-walled, 2~3 µm thick; skeletal hyphae abundant, thick-walled to semisolid, 3~7 µm thick. Basidia clavate, 17~20 × 4~5 µm. Basidiospores allantoid, hyaline, 3.4~4 × 1.2~1.7 µm, Q = 2.8~3.1.

Specimens examined

SFC20030614-03, SFC20040527-63, and SFC20130521-14.

Remarks

Antrodia xantha is characterized by its small pores (7~8/mm), cream-colored, thick, and resupinate basidiocarps, and host specificity on conifers. A. sinuosa and A. sitchensis are morphologically similar to A. xantha; however, pore size could be a distinguishing characteristic.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Korea National Arboretum (Project No. KNA 1-1-10) and the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR No. 2012-02-042).

References

  • 1.Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L. North American polypores. Vol. 1. Abortiporus-Lindtneria. Oslo: Fungiflora; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Donk MA. Notes on European polypores. I. Persoonia. 1966;4:337–343. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim SY, Park SY, Ko KS, Jung HS. Phylogenetic analysis of Antrodia and related taxa based on partial mitochondrial SSU rDNA sequences. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2003;83:81–88. doi: 10.1023/a:1022993703799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ghobad-Nejhad M, Dai YC. Diplomitoporus rimosus is found in Asia and belongs to the Hymenochaetales. Mycologia. 2010;102:1510–1517. doi: 10.3852/10-025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schmidt O. Wood and tree fungi: biology, damage, protection, and use. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lonsdale D, Pautasso M, Holdenrieder O. Wood-decaying fungi in the forest: conservation needs and management options. Eur J For Res. 2008;127:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fukami T, Dickie IA, Paula Wilkie J, Paulus BC, Park D, Roberts A, Buchanan PK, Allen RB. Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities. Ecol Lett. 2010;13:675–684. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01465.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Olsson J, Jonsson BG, Hjältén J, Ericson L. Addition of coarse woody debris: the early fungal succession on Picea abies logs in managed forest and reserves. Biol Conserv. 2011;144:1100–1110. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rajala T, Peltoniemi M, Pennanen T, Mäkipää R. Fungal community dynamics in relation to substrate quality of decaying Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) logs in boreal forests. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;81:494–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01376.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmidt O. Indoor wood-decay basidiomycetes: damage, causal fungi, physiology, identification and characterization, prevention and control. Mycol Prog. 2007;6:261–279. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bagley ST, Richter DL. Biodegradation by brown-rot fungi. In: Osiewacz HD, editor. The mycota: a comprehensive treatise on fungi as experimental systems for basic and applied research. Vol. 10. Industrial applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001. pp. 327–341. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vaidya A, Singh T. Pre-treatment of Pinus radiata substrates by basidiomycetes fungi to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34:1263–1267. doi: 10.1007/s10529-012-0894-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lu MC, El-Shazly M, Wu TY, Du YC, Chang TT, Chen CF, Hsu YM, Lai KH, Chiu CP, Chang FR, et al. Recent research and development of Antrodia cinnamomea. Pharmacol Ther. 2013;139:124–156. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rajchenberg M, Gorjón SP, Pildain MB. The phylogenetic disposition of Antrodia s.l. (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) from Patagonia, Argentina. Aust Syst Bot. 2011;24:111–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lee JS, Jung HS. List of recorded Korean Aphyllophorales. Korean J Mycol. 2005;33:38–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jang Y, Choi HE, Lim YW, Lee JS, Kim JJ. The first report of Antrodia sitchensis (Polyporaceae, Basidiomycota) in Korea. Mycobiology. 2011;39:226–229. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2011.39.3.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaburagi Y. Korean and Manchurian practical manual of forest. Tokyo: Yokendo; 1940. Korea Forest Experiment Station; p. 366. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jung HS. Fungal flora of Ullung Island (III): on some polyporoid fungi. Korean J Mycol. 1992;20:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee YW. A list of the Korean fungi part III: on the 49 unrecorded species of higher fungi in Korea. Seoul: Forest Experiment Station; 1959. pp. 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jung HS. Floral studies on Korean wood-rotting fungi (II): on the flora of the Aphyllophorales (Basidiomycotina) Korean J Mycol. 1994;22:62–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lim YW, Kim YH, Jung HS. The Aphyllophorales of Mungyong Saejae. Mycobiology. 2000;28:142–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee JS, Kim KM, Jung HS. The Aphyllophorales of the Kyeryoungsan National Park. Mycobiology. 2002;30:133–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W Fungal Barcoding Consortium. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6241–6246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Largent DL, Johnson D, Watling R. How to identify mushrooms to genus III: microscopic features. Eureka: Mad River Press; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Breitenbach J, Kränzlin P. Fungi of Sitzerland. Vol. 2. Non-gilled fungi: Heterobasidiomycetes, Aphyllophorales, Gasteromycetes. Lucerne: Verlag Mykologia; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jung HS. Wood-rotting Aphyllophorales of the southern Appalachian spruce fir forest. Bibliotheca Mycologica, Band 119. Berlin: Lubrecht & Cramer Ltd.; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rogers SO, Bendich AJ. Extraction of total cellular DNA from plants, algae and fungi. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA, editors. Plant molecular biology manual D1. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press; 1994. pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press, Inc.; 1990. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gardes M, Bruns TD. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol. 1993;2:113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Park MS, Fong JJ, Lee H, Oh SY, Jung PE, Min YJ, Seok SJ, Lim YW. Delimitation of Russula subgenus Amoenula in Korea using three molecular markers. Mycobiology. 2013;41:191–201. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2013.41.4.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ortiz-Santana B, Lindner DL, Miettinen O, Justo A, Hibbett DS. A phylogenetic overview of the Antrodia clade (Basidiomycota, Polyporales) Mycologia. 2013;105:1391–1411. doi: 10.3852/13-051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Parmasto E. Conspectus systematis Corticiacearum. Tartu: Institutum Zoologicum et Botanicum Academiae Scientiarum R.P.S.S. Estonicae; 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim SY, Park SY, Jung HS. Phylogenetic classification of Antrodia and related genera based on ribosomal RNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;11:475–481. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chiu HH. Phylogenetic analysis of Antrodia species and Antrodia camphorata inferred from internal transcribed spacer region. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2007;91:267–276. doi: 10.1007/s10482-006-9116-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu ZH, Wu SH, Wang DM, Chen CT. Phylogenetic relationships of Antrodia species and related taxa based on analyses of nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Bot Stud. 2010;51:53–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Spirin V, Miettinen O, Pennanen J, Kotiranta H, Niemelä T. Antrodia hyalina, a new polypore from Russia, and A. leucaena, new to Europe. Mycol Prog. 2013;12:53–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Spirin V, Vlasák J, Niemelä T, Miettinen O. What is Antrodia sensu stricto? Mycologia. 2013;105:1555–1576. doi: 10.3852/13-039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bernicchia A, Gorjón SP, Vampola P, Ryvarden L, Prodi A. A phylogenetic analysis of Antrodia s.l. based on nrDNA ITS sequences, with emphasis on rhizomorphic European species. Mycol Prog. 2012;11:93–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Singer R. Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature of the polypores. Mycologia. 1944;36:65–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim GH, Lim YW, Song YS, Kim JJ. Decay fungi from playground wood products in service using 28S rDNA sequence analysis. Holzforschung. 2005;59:459–466. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tomšovský M. Molecular phylogeny and taxonomic position of Trametes cervina and description of a new genus Trametopsis. Czech Mycol. 2008;60:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karsten PA. Symbolae ad mycologiam Fennicam 8. Medd Soc Fauna Flora Fenn. 1881;6:7–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gilbertson RL, Ryvarden L. Some new combinations in the polyporaceae. Mycotaxon. 1985;22:363–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ryvarden L. Some genera of resupinate polypores with a note on Aleurodiscus norvegicus nov. sp. Nor J Bot. 1973;20:7–11. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycobiology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Mycology

RESOURCES