Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2015 Mar 12;5:9036. doi: 10.1038/srep09036

Self-induced parametric amplification arising from nonlinear elastic coupling in a micromechanical resonating disk gyroscope

Sarah H Nitzan 1, Valentina Zega 2, Mo Li 1, Chae H Ahn 3, Alberto Corigliano 2, Thomas W Kenny 3, David A Horsley 1,a
PMCID: PMC4356982  PMID: 25762243

Abstract

Parametric amplification, resulting from intentionally varying a parameter in a resonator at twice its resonant frequency, has been successfully employed to increase the sensitivity of many micro- and nano-scale sensors. Here, we introduce the concept of self-induced parametric amplification, which arises naturally from nonlinear elastic coupling between the degenerate vibration modes in a micromechanical disk-resonator, and is not externally applied. The device functions as a gyroscope wherein angular rotation is detected from Coriolis coupling of elastic vibration energy from a driven vibration mode into a second degenerate sensing mode. While nonlinear elasticity in silicon resonators is extremely weak, in this high quality-factor device, ppm-level nonlinear elastic effects result in an order-of-magnitude increase in the observed sensitivity to Coriolis force relative to linear theory. Perfect degeneracy of the primary and secondary vibration modes is achieved through electrostatic frequency tuning, which also enables the phase and frequency of the parametric coupling to be varied, and we show that the resulting phase and frequency dependence of the amplification follow the theory of parametric resonance. We expect that this phenomenon will be useful for both fundamental studies of dynamic systems with low dissipation and for increasing signal-to-noise ratio in practical applications such as gyroscopes.

Nano- and micromechanical resonators with high quality factor are exquisitely sensitive detectors for weak signals and are particularly widely used in the detection of weak forces in applications such as inertial sensing, atomic force microscopy, and gravimetric sensors. In these applications, mechanical pre-amplification of the force signal is appealing because it reduces the impact of secondary detection noise1,2 and may allow quantum-limited measurements3,4. In a conventional linear resonator, setting the input signal's frequency equal to the resonator's natural frequency maximizes the sensitivity, which is proportional to the quality factor, Q. Because there are physical limits on the achievable Q, various schemes have been proposed to exploit nonlinear mechanisms that might afford additional amplification5,6,7,8,9. Among these, parametric amplification, in which the resonator's stiffness is modulated at twice its oscillation frequency10, can be noise free down to a quantum-mechanical level11 and has been shown to result in useful pre-amplification. Parametric amplification also exhibits interesting phenomena such as phase-dependent amplification and thermomechanical noise squeezing10, and quality factor enhancement independent from bandwidth12. Parametric resonances have also been used to improve frequency noise13,14, increase the sensitivity of atomic force microscopy (AFM) microcantilevers10 Lorentz force magnetometers15 and micro-gyroscopes. Gyroscopes using externally-applied parametric amplification to separate drive and sense frequencies, to increase drive-axis bandwidth, or to amplify the Coriolis force have been explored16,17,18,19,20,21 however, despite two decades of research surrounding parametrically-amplified resonators, parametric stiffness variation has always been intentionally induced by external means. Here, we introduce the concept of self-induced parametric amplification, which arises naturally as a result of gyroscope operation. Nonlinear coupling between the gyroscope's two modes introduces parametric amplification of the Coriolis force without the need for externally-applied parametric pumping.

Parametric amplification occurs when two modes consisting of the signal (at frequency ω) and an “idler” (at frequency ωi) are coupled through some nonlinearity via a pump input (at frequency ωp = ω + ωi). In micromechanical devices, degenerate parametric amplification (ωi = ω) is typically implemented using a pump input to modulate the resonator's stiffness at 2ω either electrostatically17,22,23, thermally24, or through piezoelectric stiffness modification25,26. However, some micromechanical resonators naturally exhibit degenerate vibration modes, a fact that is fundamental to the operation of sensors such as micromechanical gyroscopes. Less well-known is the fact that nonlinear elastic behavior arising from both geometric and material effects can result in nonlinear coupling between these modes. In this Article, we describe self-induced parametric amplification arising from nonlinear coupling between the degenerate elliptical vibration modes of a silicon disk resonator. The primary mode's vibration at frequency ω creates a time-varying stress field that in turn modifies the stiffness of the secondary mode. Because the stress field is two-fold symmetric, the stiffness modulation occurs at 2ω, resulting in self-induced parametric amplification of the secondary mode that is phase-locked to the primary mode's vibration signal. The immediate practical application of this phenomenon is to micromechanical gyroscopes, wherein driven oscillation of a primary vibration mode results in Coriolis force on a secondary degenerate vibration mode when the device rotates. Because the Coriolis force is also phase-locked to the driven oscillation velocity, self-induced parametric amplification can dramatically increase the gyroscope's sensitivity to angular rotation rate.

Results

Device and Operation

The resonator, shown in Fig. 1a, is a 0.6 mm diameter single-crystal silicon slotted disk supported by a central cylindrical post and surrounded by capacitive electrodes used to force and sense vibration27. This particular device has attracted interest as a candidate high-performance MEMS gyroscope28. The device is vacuum sealed at a pressure near 1 Pa using an epitaxial silicon layer (Supplementary Information). The disk supports a number of radial vibration modes in degenerate pairs whose orthogonal mode shapes are described by sin(nθ) and cos(nθ) where n is the mode index. The n = 2 mode shapes used here are shown in Fig. 1b. Fabrication imperfections and crystalline anisotropy, which results in anisotropic elasticity29, break the resonator's symmetry, splitting the frequency of the two modes so that they are not perfectly degenerate. Degeneracy is restored via spoke-angle compensation30 and electrostatic tuning (Supplementary Information). The frequency response before and after tuning is illustrated in Fig. 2, showing that the initial frequency split δω/2π = 90 Hz is reduced to less than 50 mHz. Here, a temperature-controlled environment ensures that this tuned condition is maintained, but there are several approaches for maintaining closed-loop tuning of a gyroscope31,32,33.

Figure 1. Disk Resonator Gyroscope (DRG).

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

a) SEM of DRG and drawing showing DRG shape, with inset SEM of rings. b) Orthogonal elliptical mode shapes, with color indicating displacement. Red corresponds to maximum displacement, while blue corresponds to zero displacement.

Figure 2. Amplitude and phase response of the two axes of the DRG.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Shown before mode-matching (pale lines) and after mode-matching (dark lines and inset figures). The initial frequency mismatch of 90 Hz is reduced to <50 mHz.

When operated as a gyroscope, the modes in a degenerate pair are called the drive and sense modes. A phase-locked loop (PLL) maintains sinusoidal oscillation of the drive mode Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is the amplitude and ω/2π = 251 kHz is the resonant frequency. When rotation rate, Ω, is applied, this vibration is coupled to the orthogonal sense mode through the Coriolis force, Inline graphic where m is the modal mass, c is the degree of Coriolis coupling between the two modes, and Inline graphic is the velocity of the driven mode (Supplementary Information). A second effect of imperfect symmetry is the introduction of stiffness coupling between the modes, kAB, producing a force on the sensing mode, Inline graphic, referred to as the quadrature force since its phase is shifted by 90° relative to the Coriolis force. Together, FC and FQ are the main forces that excite vibration of the sense mode. The in-phase component of the sense mode vibration qB is used as a measure of the rotation rate. Typically, the quadrature force, FQ is regarded as an error source in gyroscopes and is avoided through the use of phase sensitive detection and active cancellation. In a mode-matched gyroscope, the modes are perfectly degenerate and the sense mode amplitude in response to a constant rate input is given by Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is the rate sensitivity. As a result, a gyroscope's sensitivity to rotation can be increased by maximizing Q and operating at large vibration amplitudes Inline graphic, a fact that introduces the need to operate the resonator in the regime where nonlinear mechanical effects are important.

Parametric Nonlinearities

At large amplitude, nonlinear mechanical coupling between the two degenerate modes leads to self-induced parametric amplification of the Coriolis force input and causes the rate sensitivity to be dependent on both the amplitude Inline graphic and the phase shift ϕ between qA and the applied forces. A lumped element model for the device (Fig. 3), shows that nonlinear elastic effects cause the driven mode's displacement Inline graphic to modulate the stiffness of the sensing mode, kB(t) = kB + Δk(qA). Because the mode shape is two-fold symmetric, the stiffness change is insensitive to the sign of the displacement and Δk approximates a rectified sine wave. The 2ω component of this rectified sine wave has a 45 degree phase shift relative to qA, establishing the phase relationship between the 2ω pump and 1ω signal waveforms (FC and FQ).

Figure 3. Lumped element model of gyroscope.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Due to geometric nonlinearity, displacement of the drive axis (qA) modulates the stiffness of the sense axis (kB) at twice the resonant frequency, thus parametrically amplifying Coriolis force and electrostatic inputs to the sense axis. The relative phases of these signals are shown.

The resulting behavior can be understood as a degenerate parametric amplifier described by the Mathieu equation:

graphic file with name srep09036-m1.jpg

where λ = Δk/kB is the fractional stiffness change. When λ = 0, the device is a linear resonator and the sensitivity to force at the resonance frequency ω is Q/k. When λ ≠ 0, the device is a parametric resonator and the excess parametric gain depends on the phase ϕ of the 1ω signal F relative to the 2ω pump10,

graphic file with name srep09036-m2.jpg

so that the total gain at resonance is given by F/q = G(ϕ)·Q/k. Maximum amplification occurs when the 1ω and 2ω signals are phase shifted by ϕ = 90°, and the system becomes self-oscillating when the stiffness change reaches a critical threshold, λcrit = 2Q−1, a condition known as autoparametric oscillation. Here, Q = 8 · 104 and λcrit = 25·10−6, so even the very small nonlinear elastic behavior of the silicon disk results in significant parametric amplification, provided the two modes are degenerate. Experiments and finite element method (FEM) simulations (Supplementary Information) indicate that λcrit occurs at a vibration amplitude of 19 nm. Parametric amplification also affects the resonator's frequency response: the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the resonance peak, Δω, which is proportional to ωQ−1 in a linear resonator, is reduced.

Experimental Results

Self-induced parametric amplification was first observed by measuring the gyroscope's sensitivity to rotation rate SΩ as a function of the amplitude of the driven mode, Inline graphic. In what follows, we report Inline graphic as a percentage of the capacitive electrode gap, g = 1.5 μm. Because electrostatic spring softening results in decreased resonant frequency of the drive axis at large Inline graphic via the Duffing equation34, the electrostatic tuning voltage was adjusted at each Inline graphic to maintain mode-match (δω ≈ 0) by finding the tuning voltage that maximized the sensitivity SΩ. Using a rate table, sinusoidal rotation rates with frequency varying from 0.2 Hz to 8 Hz were applied to the gyroscope. The resulting amplitude of the sensing mode, Inline graphic, is plotted in Fig. 4. When the driven mode's amplitude is small Inline graphic, the frequency response exhibits the expected Lorentzian shape with Δω/2π = 3 Hz. As Inline graphic is increased, the scale-factor, SΩ, increases at a rate much greater than Inline graphic; an 8-fold increase in Inline graphic results in a 67-fold increase in SΩ and a two-fold reduction in Δω.

Figure 4. Observed response to rate.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

As the drive mode's amplitude is increased, the rate sensitivity increases nonlinearly, and quality factor Q is artificially increased, both resulting from self-induced parametric amplification of the Coriolis force. Inset shows the measured frequency response at small and large amplitudes, indicating the reduced bandwidth observed at large amplitude due to the artificial increase in Q.

Due to the degeneracy of the two modes, which results in coupling between the two modes, the frequency shift of one mode induced by the motion of the other cannot be probed by standard techniques, such as those employed by Refs. 35, 36 and 37 which involve measuring the amplitude, phase, or frequency of the parametrically-amplified mode while the first mode is being excited either through a sweep or by locking to its resonance. In addition, much of the theory developed for predicting this behavior has been developed using Euler-Beam theory, and is not directly applicable to the complex geometry present in this device. Thus, in order to further characterize the observed amplification, the force sensitivity was probed by applying an additional electrostatic force directly to the sensing mode with a controlled phase relative to the excitation applied to the driven axis (Supplementary Information), and measuring the amplitude of the movement caused by this additional force. The baseline motion of the sensing mode due to modal coupling, electrode misalignment, and electrical feedthrough of the drive signal were subtracted, so that the resulting amplification of the force applied to the sense mode could be accurately measured. The system was allowed to stabilize for 10 seconds before measurements were taken to ensure a steady-state response, and the measurements themselves were averaged over a one-second interval. The resulting amplification of this additional force is shown in Fig. 5a, exhibiting phase dependence consistent with parametric amplification (Eq. 2), with maximum amplification occurring at ϕ = ±90° and minimum amplification at ϕ = 0°. The phase of the Coriolis and quadrature forces (FC and FQ) are indicated on the plot. We extract Δk by fitting the experimental data with the theoretical model for G(ϕ), and the measured gain at 0° and 90° as a function of Δk agrees well with the model, as shown in Fig. 5b. Finite element method (FEM) simulations that incorporate geometric stiffness nonlinearities yield values for Δk that are similar in magnitude to the value extracted from experiments (Supplementary Information). Experiments conducted on resonators fabricated from silicon with two different dopants (n-type, Antimony, 2·1018 cm−3; p-type, Boron, 5·1018 cm−3) led to extracted Δk values that were nearly identical, indicating that the observed nonlinearity is geometric in nature, rather than being due to intrinsic nonlinearity of the elastic coefficients of silicon, which are observed to depend strongly on dopant type and concentration38. The ac voltage used to actuate the drive mode of the DRG is a pure sinusoid at ω, but electrostatic nonlinearity of the transduction and tuning electrodes does contribute a small change in stiffness at 2ω17,21. A conservative estimate, however, shows this component to be no larger than 0.22 ppm even for very large amplitude vibration of the sensing mode (Inline graphic) (Supplementary Information).

Figure 5. Electrostatically-probed parametric amplification.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

a) Parametric gain measured at various vibration amplitudes, Inline graphic, versus phase shift between the sense axis excitation force and the drive mode's vibration, with theoretical fit superposed. b) Measured and theoretical parametric gain at ±90° and 0° phase shifts versus change in stiffness extracted by fitting data in Fig. 5a) to Equation (2). c) Measured parametric gain at Inline graphic amplitude plotted as the tuning voltage is varied from VT, the voltage required for the degenerate (mode-matched) condition. At ΔVT = 0 the modes are degenerate (red dashed line) and the parametric gain curve is symmetric about 0° phase shift, as shown in red in the top inset. Non-degenerate operation (blue dashed line), decreases the maximum gain and shifts the phase at which this occurs, shown in blue in the inset.

Impact of Mode-Matched Operation

In this device, self-induced parametric amplification is a result of mode-matched operation. To demonstrate this, we investigated the effect of operating in a non-degenerate condition by adjusting the tuning voltage such that δω ≠ 0. Since the Δk pump is at 2(ω + δω), mistuning results in diminished parametric gain, as demonstrated in Fig. 5c. Using δ = 4k/(m(2ω + δω)2) − 1 as a parameter to represent the normalized detuning, the parametric gain experienced by the Coriolis force is expected to be39

graphic file with name srep09036-m3.jpg

G(δ) is shown in Fig. 6 a and b, with the measured gain (calculated by dividing the measured SΩ from Fig. 4 by the linear prediction) superposed. The stability boundary takes the shape of an Arnold's tongue40,41,42 as previously observed in nanomechanical systems43,44,45. The offset frequency for this data is selected so that the measured gain falls on the theoretical surface. Experimentally, this frequency offset is the result of tuning to maximize rate sensitivity: when λ exceeds λcrit for a given drive amplitude, the maximum sensitivity is obtained by introducing a frequency offset of several Hz, so that parametric amplification can be stably attained. Here, the maximum gain is limited to approximately 8. Larger parametric gains are difficult to achieve stably since they are quite sensitive to small variations in stiffness and quality factor, both of which depend on temperature.

Figure 6. Theoretical parametric amplification of the Coriolis force versus frequency offset from 2ω.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The measured amplification, black circles, is calculated by dividing the measured SΩ by the linear prediction obtained from the first three data points. The measured points are plotted at the offset frequency required to obtain the observed amplification. a) Shows perspective view, and b) shows top-down view.

Discussion

The observed parametric gain, combined with operation at large drive displacements (Inline graphic), results in a 67-fold increase in sensitivity, as extracted by fitting to the measured data. This increased sensitivity can greatly reduce the impact of electronic noise from the readout electronics on the gyroscope's output, offering the potential to significantly reduce gyroscope power consumption. More fundamentally, it has been observed that mode-matched operation often results in greater instability of the gyroscope's zero-rate output, known as bias instability. Here, we observe that mode-matched operation introduces self-induced parametric amplification which, if un-regulated, results in dramatic sensitivity fluctuations which can lead to increased bias instability. Whether parametric amplification is intentionally employed to increase scale factor, or suppressed through electrostatic cancellation or design modifications to provide greater stability, knowledge of the presence of self-induced parametric amplification is critical to enable high-Q gyroscope operation at large drive amplitudes.

We present the first observation of self-induced parametric amplification due to nonlinear stiffness coupling between degenerate orthogonal vibration modes in a high quality-factor micromechanical resonator. This amplification has an important application to increase the rate sensitivity of vibratory gyroscopes and may find other applications in mechanical pre-amplification of other high quality factor micro- and nano-mechanical resonators.

Methods

The DRG is fabricated in <100> silicon, and vacuum sealed via epitaxial encapsulation. The structure is 0.6 mm in diameter, and 40 μm thick. It consists of 36 concentric 3-μm thick rings with spokes spaced by 45° increments, and at alternating angles (offset by 22.5°) so that the structure is suspended from a single central anchor. The gaps between each ring and the transduction gap surrounding the structure are 1.5 μm. A bias voltage (15 V) is applied to the central anchor, so that movement of the structure induces a current on capacitive electrodes surrounding the structure. Additional electrodes surrounding the device are biased with tuning voltages (> −20 V) to achieve degenerate modes, δω ≈ 0.

The device is wirebonded out to a ceramic package and mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB), where the signals are amplified. A Zurich Instruments HF2LI lock-in amplifier is used to provide ac drive signals, bias, and tuning voltages, as well as to perform all the measurements described above.

The PCB with the gyro is mounted on a rate table for inertial testing. Although the rate table itself is not temperature-controlled, the device temperature is stabilized at approximately 28°C using a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) mounted below the PCB.

Author Contributions

S.N. and M.L. conceived the experiments. S.N., M.L. and V.Z. developed supporting theory and performed experiments. V.Z. and S.N. performed finite element modeling. C.A. performed independent experiments, and fabricated the device. T.K., A.C. and D.H. oversaw the research, provided guidance, and discussed the results and implications at all stages. D.H. and S.N. wrote the manuscript, and all authors edited the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep09036-s1.pdf (423.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by DARPA under contracts W31P4Q-12-1-0001 and N66001-12-1-4260. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Andrei Shkel and Dr. Robert Lutwak, MTO Program Managers responsible for the Micro Precision Navigation and Timing Program at DARPA. The device was fabricated by Chae Ahn, Vu Hong, Eldwin Ng, and Yushi Yang at the Stanford Nanofabrication Facility. Valentina Zega thanks STMicroelectronics for her PhD grant, and Prof. D. Horsley and the whole group of BSAC at UCD for kind hospitality.

References

  1. Arlett J. L., Maloney J. R., Gudlewski B., Muluneh M. & Roukes M. L. Self-Sensing Micro- and Nanocantilevers with Attonewton-Scale Force Resolution. Nano Lett. 6, 1000–1006, 10.1021/nl060275y (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Prakash G., Hu S., Raman A. & Reifenberger R. Theoretical basis of parametric-resonance-based atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 79, 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094304 (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lucamarini M., Vitali D. & Tombesi P. Scheme for a quantum-limited force measurement with an optomechanical device. Phys. Rev. A 74, 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.063816 (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Massel F. et al. Microwave amplification with nanomechanical resonators. Nature 480, 351–354, 10.1038/nature10628 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Almog R., Zaitsev S., Shtempluck O. & Buks E. High intermodulation gain in a micromechanical Duffing resonator. App Phys Lett 88, 213509, 10.1063/1.2207490 (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buks E. & Yurke B. Mass detection with a nonlinear nanomechanical resonator. Phys. Rev. E 74, 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.046619 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Villanueva L. G. et al. Surpassing Fundamental Limits of Oscillators Using Nonlinear Resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177208 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greywall D. S., Yurke B., Busch P. A., Pargellis A. N. & Willett R. L. Evading amplifier noise in nonlinear oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2992–2995, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2992 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yurke B., Greywall D., Pargellis A. & Busch P. Theory of amplifier-noise evasion in an oscillator employing a nonlinear resonator. Phys. Rev. A 51, 4211–4229, 10.1103/PhysRevA.51.4211 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rugar D. & Grütter P. Mechanical Parametric Amplification and Thermomechanical Noise Squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 699–702 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Caves C. Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers. Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817–1839, 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817 (1982). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu Z., Gallacher B. J., Harish K. M. & Burdess J. S. An experimental study of high gain parametric amplification in MEMS. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 162, 145–154, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.11.016 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  13. Villanueva L. G. et al. A Nanoscale Parametric Feedback Oscillator. Nano Lett. 11, 5054–5059, 10.1021/nl2031162 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cassella C., Miller N., Segovia-Fernandez J. & Piazza G. Parametric filtering surpasses resonator noise in ALN contour-mode oscillators. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on. 1269–1272. [Google Scholar]
  15. Thompson M. J. & Horsley D. A. Parametrically Amplified Z-Axis Lorentz Force Magnetometer. J. Micromech. Syst. 20, 702–710, 10.1109/JMEMS.2011.2140355 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gallacher B. J. & Burdess J. S. Dynamic analysis of a microelectromechanical systems resonant gyroscope excited using combination parametric resonance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 220, 1463–1479, 10.1243/09544062jmes196 (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gallacher B. J., Burdess J. S. & Harish K. M. A control scheme for a MEMS electrostatic resonant gyroscope excited using combined parametric excitation and harmonic forcing. J. Micromech. Microeng. 16, 320–331, 10.1088/0960-1317/16/2/017 (2006). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sharma M., Sarraf E. H. & Cretu E. Parametric amplification/damping in MEMS gyroscopes. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 2011 IEEE 24th International Conference on. 617–620. [Google Scholar]
  19. Oropeza-Ramos L. A., Burgner C. B. & Turner K. L. Robust micro-rate sensor actuated by parametric resonance. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 152, 80–87, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.010 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller N. J., Shaw S. W., Oropeza-Ramos L. A. & Turner K. L. in ASME 2008 9th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems and Analysis Vol. 2 793–797 (Haifa, Israel, 2008). [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharma M., Sarraf E. H., Baskaran R. & Cretu E. Parametric resonance: Amplification and damping in MEMS gyroscopes. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 177, 79–86, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.08.009 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. Baskaran R. & Turner K. Mechanical domain non-degenerate parametric resonance in torsional mode micro electro mechanical oscillator. TRANSDUCERS, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference on, 2003. 863–866 vol.861. [Google Scholar]
  23. Grasser L., Hervé M., Parrain F., Le Roux X. & Gilles J.-P. MEMS Q-factor Enhancement Using Parametric Amplification: Theoretical Study and Design of a Parametric Device. Design, Test, Integration & Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP of MEMS/MOEMS). 26–34. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zalalutdinov M. et al. Optically pumped parametric amplification for micromechanical oscillators. App Phys Lett 78, 3142, 10.1063/1.1371248 (2001). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dâna A., Ho F. & Yamamoto Y. Mechanical parametric amplification in piezoresistive gallium arsenide microcantilevers. App Phys Lett 72, 1152, 10.1063/1.120998 (1998). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Karabalin R. B., Masmanidis S. C. & Roukes M. L. Efficient parametric amplification in high and very high frequency piezoelectric nanoelectromechanical systems. App Phys Lett 97, 183101, 10.1063/1.3505500 (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shcheglov K. V. & Challoner A. D. Method of producing an inertial sensor. United States patent US7401397 B2 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  28. Nitzan S. et al. Epitaxially-encapsulated polysilicon disk resonator gyroscope. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 2013 IEEE 26th International Conference on. 625–628. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hopcroft M. A., Nix W. D. & Kenny T. W. What is the Young's Modulus of Silicon? J. Micromech. Syst. 19, 229–238, 10.1109/JMEMS.2009.2039697 (2010). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ahn C. H. et al. Mode-Matching of Wineglass Mode Disk Resonator Gyroscope in (100) Single Crystal Silicon. J. Micromech. Syst. [In press], 10.1109/JMEMS.2014.2330590 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sonmezoglu S., Alper S. E. & Akin T. An automatically mode-matched MEMS gyroscope with 50 Hz bandwidth. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 2012 IEEE 25th International Conference on. 523–526. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ezekwe C. D. & Boser B. E. A Mode-Matching simga-delta Closed-Loop Vibratory Gyroscope Readout Interface With a 0.004 deg/s/rt-Hz Noise Floor Over a 50 Hz Band. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of 43, 3039–3048, 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2006465 (2008). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharma A., Zaman M. F. & Ayazi F. A Sub-0.2 deg/hr Bias Drift Micromechanical Silicon Gyroscope With Automatic CMOS Mode-Matching. Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of 44, 1593–1608, 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2016996 (2009). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Holmes P. J. & Rand D. A. The Bifurcations of Duffing's Equation: an Application of Catastrophe Theory. J. Sound Vib. 44, 237–253 (1976). [Google Scholar]
  35. Matheny M. H., Villanueva L. G., Karabalin R. B., Sader J. E. & Roukes M. L. Nonlinear Mode-Coupling in Nanomechanical Systems. Nano Lett. 13, 1622–1626, 10.1021/nl400070e (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Venstra W. J., van Leeuwen R. & van der Zant H. S. J. Strongly coupled modes in a weakly driven micromechanical resonator. App Phys Lett 101, 243111-213111-243114, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4769182 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. Westra H. J. R., Poot M., van der Zant H. S. J. & Venstra W. J. Nonlinear Modal Interactions in Clamped-Clamped Mechanical Resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 117205 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang Y. et al. in Solid-State Sensors, Actuators, and Microsystems Workshop (eds Allen Mark, & Mehregany Mehran) 285–288 (Hilton Head Island, SC, USA, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  39. Baskaran R. Parametric resonance and amplification in single and coupled Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Ph. D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  40. Arnold V. I. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. 113–120 (Springer, 1989). [Google Scholar]
  41. Hayashi C. Nonlinear Oscillations in Physical Systems. 86–93 (McGraw-Hill, 1964). [Google Scholar]
  42. Hsieh D. Y. On Mathieu equation with damping. Journal of Mathematical Physics 21, 722–725, http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.524492 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  43. Turner K. et al. Five parametric resonances in a microelectromechanical system. Nature 396, 149–152 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang W., Baskaran R. & Turner K. Tuning the dynamic behavior of parametric resonance in a micromechanical oscillator. App Phys Lett 82, 130–132, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1534615 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  45. Moran K., Burgner C., Shaw S. & Turner K. A review of parametric resonance in microelectromechanical systems. Nonlinear Theory and Its Applications, IEICE 4, 198–224, 10.1587/nolta.4.198 (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information

srep09036-s1.pdf (423.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES