Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 2015 May 1;593(Pt 9):2113–2114. doi: 10.1113/JP270261

Efficiency of energy transfer during exercise: what are the limiting factors?

L Banks 1,, S Thompson 1, E J H Lewis 1
PMCID: PMC4422563  PMID: 25931404

Steady-state exercise at high intensity evokes specific oxygen demands. The expected increase in oxygen uptake (Inline graphic) is supplemented by a Inline graphic slow component (Inline graphic), indicative of work inefficiency within locomotor muscles (e.g. quadriceps femoris). The underlying mechanisms contributing to work inefficiency remain speculative. It has been postulated that work inefficiency may result from contractile (via an increased rate of ATP consumption per unit of power output; P/W) and/or mitochondrial (via a reduction in the ratio of ATP resynthesis per oxygen converted to water; P/O) source. 31Phosphorus-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) is a more recent technique that enables the quantification of metabolites (including adenosine triphosphate, ATP; inorganic phosphate, Pi; phosphocreatine, PCr; and pH) and can provide insight into the energy status in skeletal muscle.

The simultaneous measurement of whole-body Inline graphic (via pulmonary gas exchange) and skeletal muscle ATP turnover (via 31P-MRS) during moderate and heavy bilateral knee-extension exercise recently enabled Cannon et al. (2014) to explore this physiological dilemma. They examined thirteen healthy male participants and one female participant whom they identified as being either recreationally active or an amateur competitive athlete. Pulmonary gas exchange measures provided evidence of work inefficiency (via the Inline graphic) in heavy, but not moderate-intensity exercise. 31P-MRS measures further demonstrated changes in the concentration of PCr and total ATP turnover rate (ATPtot) during the heavy exercise only. A strong relationship was also observed between [PCr] and oxygen uptake during heavy exercise. On average, change in ATPtot during high-intensity exercise was not significantly different to slow component [PCr] ([PCr]sc) and Inline graphic; however, when looking at individual values, there were no significant correlations between change in ATPtot and Inline graphic. Taken together, authors reported that work inefficiency during heavy exercise probably arises from both contractile and mitochondrial sources.

Cannon et al. (2014) used novel magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques to examine the mechanism underlying contractile work inefficiency during high-intensity exercise. Specifically, the authors measured ATPtot in all three bioenergetic pathways by quantifying the PCr recovery mechanics while measuring breath-by-breath Inline graphic. Contrary to previous estimations, the authors did not assume a linear relationship between Inline graphic and [PCr], yielding a more robust estimation of total ATPtot. Indeed, the absence of this linear relationship during high-intensity exercise led the authors to conclude that Inline graphic is not solely attributed to contractile work inefficiency. Authors also implemented extensive familiarization and repeated test protocols in order to obtain reproducible physiological measurements and performances and eliminate any possible learning effects. The study design was further enhanced as the cadence of the knee extension was controlled to 90 min−1 by the use of a metronome. As the MR-compatible ergometer was a flywheel, this minimized any discrepancies in resistance due to individuals’ kicking speed preferences.

The authors’ primary aim was to determine the source of inefficiency in the working muscle. However, they compared ATPtot at the level of the muscle to Inline graphic measured from pulmonary gas exchange. While whole-body Inline graphic is a good indicator of muscle Inline graphic during submaximal intensities, pulmonary Inline graphic is not reflective of Inline graphic at the level of the working muscle during supramaximal intensities (Poole & Richardson, 1997). Moreover, Mortensen et al. (2008) propose that pulmonary Inline graphic is an inaccurate measure of muscle Inline graphiceven during high-intensity submaximal exercise. These researchers measured whole-body and leg haemodynamics during cycling and knee-extension exercise. Their results suggest that while whole-body Inline graphic increases linearly until exhaustion, leg Inline graphic is attenuated as early as 50% of maximal aerobic capacity due to a plateau in leg blood flow (Mortensen et al. 2008). As Cannon et al. (2014) were measuring substrate utilization and Inline graphic dynamics at intensities corresponding to 80% of their maximal aerobic capacity, their conclusions on the mechanisms contributing to a Inline graphic remain speculative. The current study used bilateral knee-extension exercise that elicits a greater rate of blood flow to muscle mass than whole-body exercise, as measured by Mortensen and colleagues (2008), thereby preventing a direct comparison between these studies. Future research could use blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (BOLD fMRI) to measure tissue perfusion in the leg. However, as blood flow is suggested to be a limiting factor in muscle Inline graphic, conclusions regarding the source of locomotor inefficiency cannot be made without doing a direct measurement of Inline graphic in the working muscle.

The use of MRI to assess muscle energetics provides a considerably greater insight into our understanding of skeletal muscle metabolism. Notably, coil placement has a considerable effect on measured outcomes. To eliminate the variation caused by muscle recruitment and the use of different motor units, the quadriceps muscle should be investigated using electromyography (EMG) to determine the region with the highest activation during familiarization trials or Inline graphic testing. This would allow the coil to be focused on the most metabolically active region, thereby eliminating a potential source of variation.

The role of neuromuscular function and muscle recruitment was described as a potential source of heterogeneity in the current study. The present study examined differences between low (∼45–55% Inline graphic) and moderate–high (∼halfway between lactate threshold and Inline graphic) exercise intensity. It is unclear why the authors did not add a third maximal intensity group at ∼100–120% of Inline graphic power. This would have provided a more comprehensive view of energy production using aerobic, anaerobic and ATP/phosphocreatine energy systems. Moreover, including a supramaximal exercise intensity would help to better understand Inline graphic, especially because of the high phosphate cost of such high-intensity exercise. An additional consideration for including a higher intensity exercise condition would enable the contributing effects of neuromuscular function to be better accounted for. Employing a design with three intensities would potentially allow for the examination of ATP turnover and Inline graphic kinetics based on level of muscle activation or fibre type (Rossiter et al. 2002).

The present study findings contribute to the growing number of skeletal muscle metabolism studies that have been conducted primarily in male partici-pants. The inclusion of one female participant is questionable and precludes the determination of possible sex differences in fat oxidation, muscle oxidative capacity and work efficiency. Willcocks et al. (2010) have documented that the [PCr] cost per watt was higher in females than males in the quadriceps muscle. This may suggest either decreased oxidative capacity or impaired exercise efficiency among females. Sex differences in fatigue during heavy exercise in adults have been associated with differences in the leg vasodilatory response, muscle fibre-type composition, and muscle activation patterns. Willcocks et al. (2010) also observed that the matching of oxygen delivery to oxygen demand was superior in males relative to females during quadriceps exercise. Exercise efficiency in females compared with males requires further investigation.

Both recreationally active and amateur competitive athletes were included in the current study. A detailed description of current physical activity and sport participation was not provided and probably increased heterogeneity in their study findings. Cannon et al. (2014) acknowledged a potential dissociation between [PCr]sc and Inline graphic in endurance-trained athletes and differences in motor unit recruitment with varying fitness levels. It is unclear whether varying fitness levels had a significant influence on study findings; however, future work should better characterize physical activity (including activity mode, intensity, duration and frequency) and consider the influence of physical activity and competitive sport participation on work inefficiency.

In summary, Cannon et al. (2014) have used novel methods to reveal that work inefficiency during heavy exercise arises from both contractile and mitochondrial sources. The inclusion of additional methods (BOLD fMRI and EMG) as well as a third exercise condition (supramaximal exercise) may help to overcome current study limitations and expand our knowledge in this field of research. The study findings are very interesting and should be substantiated in larger cohorts, including females and individuals with varying fitness levels.

Additional information

Competing interests

None declared.

References

  1. Cannon DT, Bimson WE, Hampson SA, Bowen TS, Murgatroyd SR, Marwood S, Kemp GJ. Rossiter HB. Skeletal muscle ATP turnover by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy during moderate and heavy bilateral knee extension. J Physiol. 2014;592:5287–5300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.279174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mortensen SP, Damsgaard R, Dawson EA, Secher NH. González-Alonso J. Restrictions in systemic and locomotor skeletal muscle perfusion, oxygen supply and Inline graphic during high-intensity whole-body exercise in humans. J Physiol. 2008;586:2621–2635. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.149401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Poole DC. Richardson RS. Determinants of oxygen uptake. Implications for exercise testing. Sports Med. 1997;24:308–320. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199724050-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rossiter HB, Ward SA, Kowalchuk JM, Howe FA, Griffiths JR. Whipp BJ. Dynamic asymmetry of phosphocreatine concentration and O2 uptake between the on- and off-transients of moderate- and high-intensity exercise in humans. J Physiol. 2002;541:991–1002. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.012910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Willcocks RJ, Williams CA, Barker AR, Fulford J. Armstrong N. Age- and sex-related differences in muscle phosphocreatine and oxygenation kinetics during high-intensity exercise in adolescents and adults. NMR Biomed. 2010;23:569–577. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES