Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):491–497. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000981

Characteristics of Long-Term Survivors of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Rosemary D Cress 1,2, Yingjia S Chen 1, Cyllene R Morris 3, Megan Petersen 4, Gary S Leiserowitz 4
PMCID: PMC4545401  NIHMSID: NIHMS695339  PMID: 26244529

Abstract

Objective

To identify characteristics associated with long-term survival forepithelial ovarian cancer patients using the California Cancer Registry.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of survival of all California residents diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer between 1994 and 2001 was conducted using patients identified through the cancer registry with follow up through 2011. Characteristics of the patients who survived more than 10 years (long-term survivors) were compared to three other cohorts: patients who survived less than 2 years, those who survived at least 2 but no more than 5 years, and those who survived at least 5 but no more than 10 years.

Results

A total of 3,582 out of 11,541 (31% CI=30.2%, 31.8%) of the patients survived more than 10 years. Younger age, early stage, low-grade, and non-serous histology were significant predictors of long-term survival, but long-term survivors also included women with high-risk cancer.

Conclusion

Long-term survival is not unusual in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, even in those with high-risk disease. Many of the prognostic factors are well known, but it remains to be determined why some patients with advanced stage high-grade cancers survive longer than others with the same histology. These findings are important for patient counseling.

Introduction

Patients and physicians commonly perceive ovarian cancer as a highly fatal disease. Since most patients present with advanced stage disease, the prognosis is often poor. Ovarian cancer five-year survival varies significantly by stage, but, for women diagnosed 2004 through 2010, ranged from 92% for localized disease to 27% for distant.1

Although most women diagnosed with advanced stage ovarian cancer will succumb to the disease, the biological behavior of ovarian cancer is quite variable. Even some of those patients with high-risk, advanced stage ovarian cancer survive well beyond 5 years. With an increased focus on survivorship, understanding of this information becomes important for patient counseling. There is a paucity of data about long-term ovarian cancer survivors since very few clinical series or population-based database studies extend beyond 5 years of survival. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics associated with long-term survival from epithelial ovarian cancer, using the California Cancer Registry.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective, cross sectional descriptive analysis of patients diagnosed through the California Cancer Registry. This registry is the single largest population-based cancer registry in the U.S. and contains demographic, diagnostic, treatment and outcome information extracted from medical records for every reportable cancer diagnosed among residents of the state since 1988. California law requires that physicians and hospitals report all cancer cases, and information is collected from diagnostic and treatment facilities. To ensure current follow up for vital status and cause of death, the cancer registry database is linked annually to death certificates, hospital discharge data, Medicare files, the Department of Motor Vehicles, Social Security, and other administrative databases. Linkage to the National Death Index ensures capture of deaths occurring outside California as well as cause of death, and follow up is over 96% for patients diagnosed since 2000. The California Cancer Registry is part of both the Centers for Disease Control National Program of Cancer Registries and the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program and meets or exceeds the standards of both groups for data quality and completeness. This study was determined by the Institutional Review Board at the University of California Davis to be exempt because only existing, de-identified data were included.

For this analysis we identified all patients residing in California and diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 1994 and 2001. We collected data on patient demographics (age, race–ethnicity, socioeconomic status, insurance status), year of diagnosis, cancer characteristics (stage at diagnosis, tumor grade, histology), and hospital. Patients were followed through December 31, 2011, thus allowing us at least 10 years of follow-up for all surviving patients. Characteristics of the patients who survived more than 10 years (long-term survivors) were compared to three other cohorts: patients who survived less than 2 years, those who survived at least 2 but no more than 5 years, and those who survived at least 5 but no more than 10 years. Only patients for whom ovarian cancer was the first or only cancer diagnosis were included. Patients diagnosed at autopsy were excluded from analysis.

Race–ethnicity in the cancer registry is based on information collected from medical records supplemented with linkage to algorithms to better identify Hispanics and Asian/Pacific Islanders. We categorized race/ethnicity as Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic Asian–Pacific Islander. Neighborhood level socioeconomic status (SES) was based on U.S. Census characteristics linked to the address at diagnosis combined into the summary Yost index.2 To measure urban/rural differences, we used the census-based rural/urban commuting codes, which combine population density, urbanization, and commuting times, to categorize residence at diagnosis as urban, small town, or rural (www.ers.usda.gov/Data/RuralUrbanCommutingAreaCodes). Insurance coverage was defined as private/government (including managed care and Medicare with supplement), Medicaid/low income, Medicare, Insured NOS, and uninsured. Volume of treatment facilities was categorized according to how many ovarian cancer patients received initial treatment at each facility during the study period.

Stage at diagnosis was defined based on a modification of American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Only invasive epithelial cancers were included. Tumors with ICD-O-3 morphology codes 8010-8570 (excluding 8240-8255), were considered epithelial tumors. Tumors were further categorized as serous (codes 8050, 8052, 8260, 8441, 8450, 8460, 8461), mucinous (codes 8471, 8481, 8480), clear cell (codes 8005, 8310, 8313), endometrioid (codes 8380, 8381, 8382), or adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS, codes, 8010, 8020, 8021, 8140, 8141, 8323, 8440, 8570). TNM staging was not included in the registry prior to 2004, thus subset analysis could not be done on this factor. Early stage patients may have included patients understaged because of inadequate surgical staging. The grading system included four grades, with IV being classified as undifferentiated, using the International Classification of Disease-Oncology/World Health Organization system. Tumor grades were grouped into grades I and II versus III and IV.

Patient demographic, hospital, and tumor characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Associations between these factors and survival category were evaluated using chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was done to estimate the odds of surviving more than 10 years while simultaneously controlling for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics. Statistical significance was defined by a P value <0.05. Statistical computing was performed with SAS software, Version 6.12.

Results

A total of 11,541 women residing in California were diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer during the period of 1994 to 2001. Patient demographics, cancer characteristics, insurance status and hospital volume are described in Table 1. About one quarter of the patients were under the age of 50. A majority of the patients were non-Hispanic whites, with smaller numbers of Hispanics, Asian/Pacific Islanders, and non-Hispanic blacks. Almost all patients resided in an urban area (97%). There were nearly twice as many cases categorized as grade III and IV as grade I and II, but grade information was missing in 27% of cases. 67% of ovarian cancers were stages III and IV, and only about one fifth were stage I. Serous was the predominant histologic type, followed by endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous types. The majority of ovarian cancer patients received their treatment at high volume hospitals.

Table 1. Characteristics of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed 1994-2001, California.

Variables Frequency (%)
(N = 11,541)

Age (years)
 18-50 2938 (25.46)
 51-64 3382 (29.30)
 65-74 2707 (23.46)
 75+ 2514 (21.78)
Race
 Non-Hispanic White 8464 (73.34)
 Non-Hispanic Black 496 (4.30)
 Hispanic 1534 (13.29)
 Asian/Pacific Islander 967 (8.38)
 Other/Unknown 80 (0.69)
Socioeconomic status
 Low 3665 (31.76)
 Medium 3957 (34.29)
 High 3919 (33.96)
Rural urban residence
 Urban 11207 (97.11)
 Small town 184 (1.59)
 Rural 150 (1.30)
Tumor grade
 Grade I and II 3104 (26.90)
 Grade III and IV 5295 (45.88)
 Grade and differentiation not stated 3142 (27.22)
Stage categories
 Stage I 2228 (19.31)
 Stage II 951 (8.24)
 Stage III 5173 (44.82)
 Stage IV 2559 (22.17)
 Unknown 630 (5.46)
Histology types
 Serous 5547 (48.06)
 Mucinous 541 (4.69)
 Clear Cell 612 (5.30)
 Endometrioid 1392 (12.06)
 Carcinoma, not otherwise specified 2679 (23.21)
 Other 770 (6.67)
Insurance types
 Private/Government 4929 (42.71)
 Medicaid/Low income 733 (6.35)
 Medicare 2878 (24.94)
 Insured, NOS 1035 (8.97)
 Not insured 256 (2.22)
 Unknown 1710 (14.82)
Volume of treatment hospital
 Low (0-10 cases) 548 (4.77)
 Medium (11-40 cases) 2965 (25.79)
 High (> 40 cases) 7982 (69.44)

Patients were divided into four cohorts based on length of survival (Table 2). Most patients survived less than 5 years, however, 31.0% (CI=30.2%, 31.8%) of all patients survived more than 10 years (long-term survivors). Nearly half of long-term survivors were 18-50 years old compared to 13% among those who survived less than 2 years. Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander patients made up a higher proportion of long-term survivors than other groups. A slightly higher proportion of patients who survived more than 10 years had private insurance. A higher percentage of patients who survived for at least two years resided in high SES neighborhoods and a larger proportion were cared for in hospitals that treated more than 40 cases during the study period.

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed 1994-2001, California, by length of survival.

< 2 years (N=4343, 37.6%) 2-5 years (N=2534, 22.0%) 5-10 years (N=1082, 9.4%) >10 years (N=3582, 31.0%)

N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)

Age (years)
 18-50 576 (13.26) 544 (21.47) 284 (26.25) 1534 (42.83)
 51-64 942 (21.69) 839 (33.11) 379 (35.03) 1222 (34.12)
 65-74 1134 (26.11) 706 (27.86) 281 (25.97) 586 (16.36)
 75+ 1691 (38.94) 445 (17.56) 138 (12.75) 240 (6.70)
Race
 Non-Hispanic White 3263 (75.13) 1933 (76.28) 812 (75.05) 2456 (68.57)
 Non-Hispanic Black 249 (5.73) 100 (3.95) 28 (2.59) 119 (3.32)
 Hispanic 522 (12.02) 319 (12.59) 150 (13.86) 543 (15.16)
 Asian/Pacific Islander 282 (6.49) 168 (6.63) 88 (8.13) 429 (11.98)
Socioeconomic status
 Low 1552 (35.74) 708 (27.94) 329 (30.41) 1076 (30.04)
 Medium 1516 (34.91) 860 (33.94) 369 (34.10) 1212 (33.84)
 High 1275 (29.36) 966 (38.12) 384 (35.49) 1294 (36.13)
Rural/urban residence
 Urban 4231 (97.42) 2454 (96.84) 1038 (95.93) 3484 (97.26)
 Small town 60 (1.38) 49 (1.93) 21 (1.94) 54 (1.51)
 Rural 52 (1.20) 31 (1.22) 23 (2.13) 44 (1.23)
Tumor grade
 Grade I and II 647 (14.90) 532 (20.99) 302 (27.91) 1623 (45.31)
 Grade III and IV 1965 (45.25) 1522 (60.06) 610 (56.38) 1198 (33.45)
 Grade not stated 1731 (39.86) 480 (18.94) 170 (15.71) 761 (21.25)
Stage categories
 Stage I 161 (3.71) 120 (4.74) 110 (10.17) 1837 (51.28)
 Stage II 206 (4.74) 141 (5.56) 111 (10.26) 493 (13.76)
 Stage III 2028 (46.70) 1523 (60.10) 642 (59.33) 980 (27.36)
 Stage IV 1541 (35.48) 657 (25.93) 180 (16.64) 181 (5.05)
 Unknown 407 (9.37) 93 (3.67) 39 (3.60) 91 (2.54)
Histology types
 Serous 1823 (41.98) 1673 (66.02) 699 (64.60) 1352 (37.74)
 Mucinous 213 (4.90) 56 (2.21) 23 (2.13) 249 (6.95)
 Clear Cell 163 (3.75) 60 (2.37) 30 (2.77) 359 (10.02)
 Endometrioid 210 (4.84) 217 (8.56) 134 (12.38) 831 (23.20)
 Carcinoma, not otherwise specified 1709 (39.35) 464 (18.31) 147 (13.59) 359 (10.02)
 Other 225 (5.18) 64 (2.53) 49 (4.53) 432 (12.06)
Insurance types
 Private/Government 1557 (35.85) 1155 (45.58) 489 (45.19) 1728 (48.24)
 Medicaid/Low income 251 (5.78) 157 (6.20) 73 (6.75) 252 (7.04)
 Medicare 1389 (31.98) 667 (26.32) 301 (27.82) 521 (14.54)
 Insured, not otherwise specified 273 (6.29) 229 (9.04) 82 (7.58) 451 (12.59)
 Not insured 88 (2.03) 50 (1.97) 16 (1.48) 102 (2.85)
 Unknown 785 (18.08) 276 (10.89) 121 (11.18) 528 (14.74)
Volume of hospital
 Low 256 (5.93) 92 (3.64) 35 (3.25) 165 (4.62)
 Medium 1279 (29.64) 591 (23.38) 229 (21.26) 866 (24.22)
 High 2780 (64.43) 1845 (72.98) 813 (75.49) 2544 (71.16)

Although the majority of long-term survivors had stage I cancer, 32.4% (CI=30.9%, 33.9%) had stage III and IV disease at diagnosis. Tumor grade also varied significantly, with a predominance of low-grade cancers in the women surviving more than 10 years. If the patients with unknown grade are removed, then about 58% of the long-term survivors had grade I and II cancers. Long-term survival favored those with endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous types. However, 62.3% of stage I/II patients with grade 3/4 tumor survived 10+ years, and 66.2% of stage I/II patients with serous histology survived more than 10 years.

Odds ratios that favored survival greater than 10 years over shorter survival periods are shown in Table 3. Patients missing information on SES, race/ethnicity, insurance, stage, grade, or cause of death were excluded from the multivariable analysis. Women with stage I cancer had very high odds of survival more than 10 years. Similar, but less marked associations were detected for stages II and III compared to stage IV disease. Patients with low-grade tumors were more likely to be long-term survivors. The favorable prognoses persisted for mucinous, clear cell, and endometrioid histologies compared to serous after adjustment for other factors. Younger age also remained as a significantly positive prognostic factor. However, race, SES, insurance, and hospital volume were no longer statistically significant. Results were similar when odds ratios were calculated separately for patients with stage I/II and those with stage III/IV (results not shown).

Table 3. Predictors of long-term survival for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed 1994-2001, California.

Variables Crude ORs Adjusted* ORs

Age (years)
 18-50 4.5 (3.5, 5.8) 4.1 (2.9, 5.8)
 51-64 2.7 (2.1, 3.5) 3.5 (2.5, 4.9)
 65-74 1.7 (1.3, 2.1) 2.1 (1.5, 2.9)
 75+ Ref Ref
Race
 Non-Hispanic White Ref Ref
 Non-Hispanic Black 1.0 (0.7, 1.5) 1.3 (0.8, 2.1)
 Hispanic 1.4 (1.1, 1.7) 1.2 (0.9, 1.5)
 Asian/Pacific Islander 1.9 (1.5, 2.5) 1.3 (1.0, 1.8)
Socioeconomic status
 High 0.9 (0.8, 1.1) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3)
 Medium 0.9 (0.8, 1.1) 1.0 (0.8, 1.2)
 Low Ref Ref
Tumor grade
 Grade I and II 3.4 (3.0, 4.0) 1.6 (1.4, 2.0)
 Grade III and IV Ref Ref
Stage categories
 Stage I 50.3 (35.9, 70.5) 30.9 (22.3, 45.7)
 Stage II 13.0 (9.3, 18.1) 10.7 (7.5, 12.3)
 Stage III 2.2 (1.7, 2.8) 2.2 (1.7, 2.9)
 Stage IV Ref Ref
Histology types
 Serous Ref Ref
 Mucinous 6.2 (4.3, 9.0) 2.1 (1.4, 3.3)
 Clear Cell 6.3 (4.2, 9.5) 1.9 (1.2, 3.2)
 Endometrioid 4.9 (4.1, 5.9) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3)
Insurance types
 Private/Government Ref Ref
 Medicaid/Low income 1.1 (0.9, 1.5) 1.0 (0.7, 1.4)
 Medicare 0.6 (0.5, 0.7) 1.2 (0.9, 1.5)
 Insured, not otherwise specified 1.3 (1.0, 1.6) 1.1 (0.8, 1.4)
 Not insured 1.3 (0.8, 2.0) 0.9 (0.5, 1.6)
Volume of hospital 0.999 (0.998, 1.000) 1.0 (0.999, 1.001)
*

Each variable adjusted for all other predictors

After patients with missing values were excluded from analysis, there were 954 stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients (17.2% of a total of 5536 patients) who survived more than 10 years (Table 4). 26% of women under age 50 survived more than 10 years, and although the majority of women over age 75 with late stage ovarian cancer survived less than two years, 6% survived more than 10. A higher proportion of Hispanic and Asian/PI patients survived more than 10 years. Although there were higher proportions of long-term survivors among patients with endometrioid tumors, 16% of patients with late stage serous cancer survived more than 10 years.

Table 4. Characteristics of patients diagnosed with Stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer 1994-2001 in California by length of survival.

Variables < 2 years (N=2141) 2-5 years (N=1752) 5- 10 years (N=689) >10 years (N=954) Chi-square test

N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) p-value

Age (years) <.001
 18-50 337 (27.33) 390 (31.63) 182 (14.76) 324 (26.28)
 51-64 551 (31.06) 598 (33.71) 251 (14.15) 374 (21.08)
 65-74 584 (40.19) 500 (34.41) 182 (12.53) 187 (12.87)
 75+ 669 (62.17) 264 (24.54) 74 (6.88) 69 (6.41)
Race <.001
 Non-Hispanic White 1616 (38.60) 1366 (32.62) 527 (12.59) 678 (16.19)
 Non-Hispanic Black 122 (51.48) 61 (25.74) 14 (5.91) 40 (16.88)
 Hispanic 244 (34.96) 210 (30.09) 99 (14.18) 145 (20.77)
 Asian/Pacific Islander 147 (38.18) 105 (27.27) 48 (12.47) 85 (22.08)
Tumor grade
 Grade I and II 428 (31.42) 416 (30.54) 194 (14.24) 324 (23.79)
 Grade III and IV 1237 (38.11) 1104 (34.01) 410 (12.63) 495 (15.25) <.001
 Grade and differentiation not stated 476 (51.29) 232 (25.00) 85 (9.16) 135 (14.55)
Histology types
 Serous 1675 (37.12) 1526 (33.81) 588 (13.03) 724 (16.04)
 Mucinous 182 (63.86) 42 (14.74) 18 (6.32) 43 (15.09) <.001
 Clear Cell 124 (61.39) 23 (11.39) 9 (4.46) 46 (22.77)
 Endometrioid 160 (29.85) 161 (30.04) 74 (13.81) 141 (26.31)

Discussion

This study provided a unique opportunity to examine the characteristics of women who are long-term survivors of epithelial ovarian cancer, commonly thought to be a highly fatal disease. There has been limited information about women surviving greater than 10 years, many of who are cured. Using cancer registry data not only allowed us to collect long-term survival data beyond 10 years (most studies are limited to five years of survival,3-5) but the cohort was far larger than seen in other studies.6 Most surprising was that nearly one third of ovarian cancer patients were long-term survivors, which is very important for counseling about prognosis.

Tumor biology (cancer stage, grade, and histology) had the strongest associations with survival. Although long-term survival did vary based on race–ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and insurance status, none of these remained statistically significant after adjustments for the other covariates. As expected, patients with Stage I cancers had the greatest likelihood of long-term survival, probably reflecting that many are actually cured of their disease.7,8 Chan identified four independent risk factors that were associated with survival in early stage ovarian cancer: age, stage, tumor grade, and peritoneal cytology Low-risk patients (none or 1 risk factor) had a 5-year survival of 88%, compared to the high-risk group 75% (3 or 4 risk factors), but all of these patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.7

Low-grade cancers had improved survival over high-grade cancers, consistent with earlier studies,5,9. Patients with grade 1 or 2 epithelial cancers were twice as likely to survive more than 10 years compared to those with grade 3 or 4 cancers in multivariate analysis. As noted above, grade is often not independent of stage, since the majority of Stage IA cancers are also grade 1. Grade also is not independent of histology in epithelial cancers, since several histological types, including mucinous and endometrioid, are usually low-grade, have a more indolent behavior, and are more likely to be confined to one ovary.10,11

Histology is also closely tied to both stage and grade, as noted above.12 The histologies most commonly associated with long-term survival are endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous; consistent with previous reports.5 It is not surprising that endometrioid and mucinous cancers should have a generally favorable prognosis, since they are typically also low-grade and low stage.10-12 Clear cell cancers are a distinct entity that appears to have two different behaviors. Many clear cell cancers are early stage and often associated with endometriosis, and therefore have a better prognosis than high-grade serous cancers.10,13 In contrast, advanced stage clear cell cancers tend to have a poorer survival compared to high-grade serous cancers, probably due to relative chemotherapy resistance10,13,14.

One of the most surprising findings was that nearly a third of all long-term survivors had Stages III and IV epithelial cancer, including serous cancers. The explanation for this is unclear, but there are several possibilities. Improved surgical techniques that result in high percentage of patients with no or minimal residual disease have improved outcomes.15 The use of concomitant intraperitoneal and intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with prolonged survival with a median overall survival of 110 months in patients debulked to no residual disease.16 Advanced stage ovarian cancer patients who are BRCA 1 or 2 mutation carriers have an improved survival compared to those without these mutations.17,18 It may be that there are somatic (as opposed to germline) genomic alterations that may account for long-term survival in patients with the same histology,19. Unfortunately, the cancer registry does not have information on the completeness of surgical debulking, use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, BRCA mutation status, or genomic data, so these should be topics of future investigation.

Consistent with earlier studies, 5,6,20-24 age had a great impact on overall survival in epithelial ovarian cancer and long-term survivors were more likely to be women under age 50. Young women are more likely to have low stage and low-grade epithelial cancers21 which points to a more favorable biological behavior, however the better prognosis for younger women persisted after adjustment for stage, grade, and histology and was also seen in patients with advanced stage disease similar to prior studies.24,25 Better performance status may allow younger women to tolerate more aggressive surgery and chemotherapy.

Long-term survival may bring its own challenges beyond worry about recurrence. Studies have shown that ovarian cancer patients are challenged with problems of anxiety, fatigue, sexual, social, and financial problems,26 which should be amenable to appropriate interventions. These studies highlight that physicians, especially those who provide primary care, should be prepared to address cancer survivorship needs in this group of patients.

Acknowledgments

Supported by the NCI Comprehensive Cancer Center Support Grant, (P30CA93373).

References

  • 1.Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014. Apr, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:703–11. doi: 10.1023/a:1011240019516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chan JK, Cheung MK, Husain A, Teng NN, West D, Whittemore AS, et al. Patterns and progress in ovarian cancer over 14 years. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:521–8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000231680.58221.a7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chiang YC, Chen CA, Chiang CJ, Hsu TH, Lin MC, You SL, et al. Trends in incidence and survival outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer: 30-year national population-based registry in Taiwan. Journal of gynecologic oncology. 2013;24:342–51. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.4.342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, et al. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95(Suppl 1):S161–92. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60033-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang KY, Kapp DS, Hu JM, Shin JY, Osann K, Chen LM, et al. Long-term survivors of epithelial ovarian cancer: What can we learn from these women?. 39th Annual Meeting Society of Gynecologic Oncologists; 2008; Tampa, FL. Elsevier; pp. S135–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chan JK, Tian C, Monk BJ, Herzog T, Kapp DS, Bell J, et al. Prognostic factors for high-risk early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2008;112:2202–10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Young RC, Walton LA, Ellenberg SS, Homesley HD, Wilbanks GD, Decker DG, et al. Adjuvant therapy in stage I and stage II epithelial ovarian cancer. Results of two prospective randomized trials. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1021–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199004123221501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK, Husain A, Teng NN, Berek JS, et al. Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:12–9. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249610.95885.ef. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCluggage WG. Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology. 2011;43:420–32. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0b013e328348a6e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McMeekin DS, Burger RA, Manetta A, DiSaia P, Berman ML. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary and its relationship to endometriosis. Gynecologic oncology. 1995;59:81–6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fleming ST, Kimmick GG, Sabatino SA, Cress RD, Wu XC, Trentham-Dietz A, et al. Defining care provided for breast cancer based on medical record review or Medicare claims: information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Patterns of Care Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:807–13. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.del Carmen MG, Birrer M, Schorge JO. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a review of the literature. Gynecologic oncology. 2012;126:481–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ho CM, Huang YJ, Chen TC, Huang SH, Liu FS, Chang Chien CC, et al. Pure-type clear cell carcinoma of the ovary as a distinct histological type and improved survival in patients treated with paclitaxel-platinum-based chemotherapy in pure-type advanced disease. Gynecologic oncology. 2004;94:197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elattar A, Bryant A, Winter-Roach BA, Hatem M, Naik R. Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011:CD007565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007565.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Landrum LM, Java J, Mathews CA, Lanneau GS, Jr, Copeland LJ, Armstrong DK, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecologic oncology. 2013;130:12–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhong Q, Peng HL, Zhao X, Zhang L, Hwang WT. Effects of BRCA1- and BRCA2-related mutations on ovarian and breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2015;21:211–20. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sun C, Li N, Ding D, Weng D, Meng L, Chen G, et al. The role of BRCA status on the prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis. PloS one. 2014;9:e95285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Barlin JN, Jelinic P, Olvera N, Bogomolniy F, Bisogna M, Dao F, et al. Validated gene targets associated with curatively treated advanced serous ovarian carcinoma. Gynecologic oncology. 2013;128:512–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Akhtar-Danesh N, Elit L, Lytwyn A. Temporal trends in the relative survival among patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Canada 1992–2005: A population-based study. Gynecologic oncology. 2011;123:192–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.07.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chan JK, Urban R, Cheung MK, Osann K, Shin JY, Husain A, et al. Ovarian cancer in younger vs older women: a population-based analysis. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1314–20. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O'Malley CD, Cress RD, Campleman SL, Leiserowitz GS. Survival of Californian women with epithelial ovarian cancer, 1994-1996: a population-based study. Gynecologic oncology. 2003;91:608–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tingulstad S, Skjeldestad FE, Halvorsen TB, Hagen B. Survival and prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:885–91. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00123-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Winter WE, 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, Carlson JW, Ozols RF, Rose PG, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25:3621–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chan JK, Loizzi V, Lin YG, Osann K, Brewster WR, DiSaia PJ. Stages III and IV invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger versus older women: what prognostic factors are important? Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:156–61. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00399-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wenzel LB, Donnelly JP, Fowler JM, Habbal R, Taylor TH, Aziz N, et al. Resilience, reflection, and residual stress in ovarian cancer survivorship: a gynecologic oncology group study. Psycho-oncology. 2002;11:142–53. doi: 10.1002/pon.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES