Abstract
Antibody therapeutics are a promising drug class due to their high specificity and favorable pharmacokinetics. While there are many methods for the development of antibodies specific to disease associated antigens, selecting antibodies against functional epitopes with high specificity and affinity can be difficult for certain epitopes. We describe a generalizable method for synthesizing antibody mimetics by site specifically conjugating small molecules (with high affinity and specificity to disease associated antigens) to an Fc fragment to develop drugs with the benefits of an antibody. As a proof of concept, an E269pAcPhe Fc antibody Fc fragment was produced and subsequently site-specifically labeled with a linker-modified folic acid compound to generate an Fc-folic acid antibody-mimetic. This was chosen as the model system because the high-affinity folate receptor FR-α is highly expressed in a number of cancer types including breast and ovarian cancer. The specificity of the Fc-folic acid conjugate was assessed via flowcytometry with the folate-receptor positive breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 by measuring Fc-folic acid binding in both the absence and presence of an excess of folic acid. Fc-small molecule conjugates could be developed into a unique class of antibody-like therapeutics.
Graphic abstract
Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics are a successful and rapidly expanding class of pharmaceuticals due to their high specificity (through the high affinity, bivalent Fab regions of the IgG), activity (either through direct agonist/antagonist activity via antigen binding or via antibody mediated effector function), favorable pharmacokinetics (neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) binding prevents antibody degradation and increases serum half-life), and standardized manufacturing processes.1–9 While there are many techniques for the discovery of antibodies against important disease associated antigens, finding antibodies that bind defined functional epitopes with high specificity and affinity can be difficult. Classical hybridoma mAb discovery requires animal immunization, B-cell fusion, clonal screening, and antibody gene cloning before preclinical testing of the mAb as a potential therapeutic can begin.10–12 Additionally, many hybridoma derived mAbs will have to be humanized before clinical application.13 Display based approaches circumvent many of the issues associated with animal immunization and hybridoma development. Antibody display allows for the direct selection of fully human antibodies, and the display systems are designed such that much of the cell and molecular biology associated with hybridoma development is unnecessary.14 However, despite the improvements over classical mAb development approaches, antibody display requires multiple rounds of selection, clonal screening, and can often result in mAbs that bind non-functional epitopes.14–16
Recently, in efforts to avoid the procedurally intensive and time consuming process of antibody selection, small molecules that target cell surface receptors conjugated onto antibody scaffolds have been utilized as antibody-like molecules. This enables one to take advantage of the favorable characteristics of small molecules and peptides to achieve target specificity, while still retaining the desired properties of mAb therapeutics.17
One technology utilizing small molecules as the source of affinity and specificity are Covx-bodies. Covx-bodies, developed by Barbas III et al., utilize a humanized murine aldolase catalytic antibody as the scaffold, and conjugate the small molecule (often peptide ligand mimetics) to the highly nucleophilic lysine in the catalytic active site.18 Because Covx-bodies are built on the aldolase IgG scaffold, the resulting drugs retain desirable activity and PK.19 Since every Covx-body is built on the same humanized aldolase mAb, it allows for the rapid development of mAb-like therapeutics against diverse targets.18–24 The humanized aldolase mAb platform is also a potential drawback of this technology, as humanized antibodies, while they have a substantial reduction in immunogenicity from their murine-derived precursors, still have higher immunogenicity than fully human antibodies.25–28 Additionally, nearly 2/3 of the Covx-body (the Fab regions) serve as a scaffold for the small molecule. Ideally, an optimized construct would be comprised of a small molecule conjugated directly to the Fc region to eliminate unnecessary and potentially immunogenic protein sequence.
An approach for generating an Fc-small molecule construct was recently described by Chiang et al., wherein expressed protein ligation was utilized to label the C-terminus of an Fc fragment with a high affinity small molecule.29 This process circumvents some of the drawbacks associated with the Covx-body approach while still retaining the desired effector functions of the Fc domain, however, it is potentially limited by the use of expressed protein ligation. Expressed protein ligation, while a powerful tool in protein engineering, limits labeling of proteins to the C-terminus, limits the chemistries that can be utilized for conjugation, and only allows for a single conjugation site per translated protein (e.g. 2 total sites for the Fc homodimer).30
Herein, we describe a generalizable method for the synthesis of mAb-like small molecule-antibody mimetics via the site-specific conjugation of high affinity small molecules to a human Fc antibody fragment. The Fc-small molecule conjugate relies on the small molecule for epitope binding, and the Fc portion would provide effector function and half-life of a traditional mAb therapeutic. To enable bio-orthogonal, site-specific small molecule conjugation, we expressed a E269pAcPhe Fc (from human IgG1) antibody fragment using an orthogonal amber suppressor aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pair specific for pAcPhe via previously reported methods.31,32 Briefly, recombinant Fc containing the pAcPhe UAA was produced by co-expressing, via transient transfection into HEK293-F cells, an orthogonal tRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) pair specific for pAcPhe and an Fc gene containing a TAG codon at residue E269 (Figure S1) and expressing for 7 days in the presence of 1.3 mM pAcPhe amino acid. The E269pAcPhe Fc provides a platform for which any aminoxy modified molecule can be conjugated to the incorportated ketone moeity in order to produce an antibody mimetic via an oxime linkage at a position that should not interfere with Fc binding or effector function.33–36 Utilizing a site-specifically incorporated unnatural amino acid for the small molecule conjugation (as opposed to conventional lysine or cysteine conjugation) allows for the generation of a homogenous product, both in terms of conjugate loading and conjugate location. This helps assure that final product has reproducible binding characteristics and that the small molecule conjugation will not disrupt the desired effector functions of the Fc.37,38 Additionally, this method enables the flexibility to manipulate the construct at multiple different position; UAA incorporation and biorthogonal conjugation allows for conjugation at any surface exposed site in the protein (including the N or C termini) and even allows incorporation of multiple UAAs (either the same UAA or different UAAs).39–41
As a proof of concept, we chose to conjugate folic acid, which binds with very high specificity and affinity to the high affinity folate receptor FR-α.42 FR-α is overexpressed in a number of cancer types including breast, ovarian, and lung cancer, has been explored as a potential candidate for targeted cancer therapeutics, and higher expression levels is associated with poorer outcome.43–48 Before folic acid conjugation could be accomplished, first the folic acid had to be aminoxy modified. The folic acid was modified at the carboxylic acid moieties, using previously reported chemistry, adding a short linker and the desired aminoxy group (Scheme S1, Scheme S2).17,49 The modified folic acid was then used to generate the site specific Fc-folic acid conjugate via the bio-orthogonal oxime ligation (Scheme 1).31–38 After the 48 hour reaction, the conjugate was purified and buffer exchanged via PD-10 desalting column, before being analyzed for conjugation efficiency and purity via SDS-PAGE and ESI-MS (Figure 1). The reaction proceeded in quantitative yields and as shown in the ESI-MS data, has exactly two conjugates per Fc, with one folic acid per each of the monomers that make up the Fc homodimer.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of the Fc-Folate antibody mimetic. E269pAcPhe Fc (10 mg/mL) was treated with 30 equivalents of aminoxy-modified folic acid in 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.5) with 10% DMSO for 48 hrs at 37 °C. Reaction resulted in quantitative yield verified by SDS-PAGE and ESI-MS.
Figure 1.
A) SDS-PAGE gel of the Fc-Folate conjugate and the E269pAcPhe Fc starting material. B) ESI-MS data of the Fc-Folate conjugate and the E269pAcPhe Fc starting material.
The specificity of the Fc-folic acid conjugate was assessed via flow cytometry with the folate-receptor positive breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231(Figure 2). Fc-folic acid binding was assessed in both the absence and presence of an excess of free folic acid. The results revealed that the Fc-folic acid conjugate binds to a cell line which expresses the folate receptor, and showed that the binding is specific to that receptor, as the conjugate can be competed off by an excess of free ligand (10-fold molar excess). Thus, the Fc-folic acid conjugate represents a specific reagent to report FR-positive cells, such as breast cancer cells, and enables Fc-dependent strategies for recognition and targeting.
Figure 2.
Specificity of Folate-Fc binding to human breast cancer cells. Flow cytometry analysis of Folate-Fc binding to FR-α+ MDA-MB-231 cells detected with an allophycocyanin (APC) conjugated anti-human Fc mAb secondary antibody. Orange is secondary alone, blue is Folate-Fc and secondary and red is Folate-Fc, secondary, and 10eq of free folic acid. Conjugate binding was detected with an allophycocyanin (APC) conjugated anti-human Fc mAb secondary antibody.
In summary, we report the development of a generalizable method for the synthesis of site-specifically conjugated Fc-small molecule antibody mimetics. As an example we synthesized an Fc-folic acid conjugate, and showed that it specifically bound to the folate receptor on the folate receptor positive human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. One can envision this technology being applied to other targets with associated high affinity small molecule binders. Such molecules include 2-[3-(1,3-dicarboxy propyl)-ureido] pentanedioic acid (DUPA) which specifically binds and inhibits the protease active site in the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a specific target in prostate cancer, ligand mimetic peptides against cancer associated integrins (e.g. RGD peptides against αvβ1, αvβ3, and αvβ5), and ligands and ligand mimetics of cancer associated peptide receptors (e.g. calcitonin and endothelin receptors).50–52 In particular, this method would enable the targeting of epitopes that have been historically difficult to select antibodies against (but have available small molecule binders), such as the active sites of enzymes like neuraminidase (e.g. Oseltamivir) for the treatment of influenza, or several cancer relevant cell surface enzymes including membrane anchored serine proteases like PSMA.53–57 Additionally, because the Fc portion of the conjugate should provide both the activity and desirable pharmacokinetics of the conjugate, it enables using molecules with high affinity binding characteristics, but without any innate activity (such as many aptamers), to be used in potential therapeutically relevant applications.58–62
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grant 1RC1EBO10745 and American Cancer Society grant RSG-09–1601 (V.V.S.).
Footnotes
Supporting information: Experimental procedures, characterization data, and supplementary figures. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- (1).Akilesh S; Huber TB; Wu H; Wang G; Hartleben B; Kopp JB; Miner JH; Roopenian DC; Unanue ER; Shaw AS Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105, 967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Ghetie V; Popov S; Borvak J; Radu C; Matesoi D; Medesan C; Ober RJ; Ward ES Nat Biotechnol 1997, 15, 637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Kacskovics I; Kis Z; Mayer B; West AP Jr.; Tiangco NE; Tilahun M; Cervenak L; Bjorkman PJ; Goldsby RA; Szenci O; et al. Int Immunol 2006, 18, 525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Natsume A; Niwa R; Satoh M Drug Des Devel Ther 2009, 3, 7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Nelson AL; Reichert JM Nat Biotechnol 2009, 27, 331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Ober RJ; Radu CG; Ghetie V; Ward ES Int Immunol 2001, 13, 1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Sarmay G; Lund J; Rozsnyay Z; Gergely J; Jefferis R Mol Immunol 1992, 29, 633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Scott AM; Wolchok JD; Old LJ Nat Rev Cancer 2012, 12, 278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Strohl WR Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009, 20, 685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Jin A; Ozawa T; Tajiri K; Obata T; Kondo S; Kinoshita K; Kadowaki S; Takahashi K; Sugiyama T; Kishi H; Muraguchi A Nat Med 2009, 15, 1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Kohler G; Milstein C Nature 1975, 256, 495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Love JC; Ronan JL; Grotenbreg GM; van der Veen AG; Ploegh HL Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24, 703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Clark M Immunol Today 2000, 21, 397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Hoogenboom HR Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23, 1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Levitan B J Mol Biol 1998, 277, 893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Mao H; Graziano JJ; Chase TMA; Bentley CA; Bazirgan OA; Reddy NP; Song BD; Smider VV Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28, 1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Li H; Lu Y; Piao L; Wu J; Yang X; Kondadasula SV; Carson WE; Lee RJ Bioconjug Chem 2010, 21, 961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Rader C; Turner JM; Heine A; Shabat D; Sinha SC; Wilson IA; Lerner RA; Barbas CF J Mol Biol 2003, 332, 889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Popkov M; Rader C; Gonzalez B; Sinha SC; Barbas CF 3rd Int J Cancer 2006, 119, 1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Bower KE; Lam SN; Oates BD; del Rosario JR; Corner E; Osothprarop TF; Kinhikar AG; Hoye JA; Preston RR; Murphy RE; et al. J Med Chem 2011, 54, 1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Coronella J; Li LN; Johnson K; Pirie-Shepherd S; Roxas G; Levin N Anticancer Res 2009, 29, 2243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Doppalapudi VR; Tryder N; Li LN; Aja T; Griffith D; Liao FF; Roxas G; Ramprasad MP; Bradshaw C; Barbas CF Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2007, 17, 501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Li L; Leedom TA; Do J; Huang H; Lai J; Johnson K; Osothprarop TF; Rizzo JD; Doppalapudi VR; Bradshaw CW; et al. Transl Oncol 2011, 4, 249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Li LS; Rader C; Matsushita M; Das S; Barbas CF 3rd; Lerner RA; Sinha SC J Med Chem 2004, 47, 5630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Pendley C; Schantz A; Wagner C Curr Opin Mol Ther 2003, 5, 172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Harding FA; Stickler MM; Razo J; DuBridge RB Mabs 2010, 2, 256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Hwang WYK; Foote J Methods 2005, 36, 3.15848070 [Google Scholar]
- (28).Stephens S; Emtage S; Vetterlein O; Chaplin L; Bebbington C; Nesbitt A; Sopwith M; Athwal D; Novak C; Bodmer M Immunology 1995, 85, 668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Chiang MJ; Holbert MA; Kalin JH; Ahn YH; Giddens J; Amin MN; Taylor MS; Collins SL; Chan-Li Y; Waickman A; et al. J Am Chem Soc 2014, 136, 3370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Muir TW; Sondhi D; Cole PA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998, 95, 6705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Kularatne SA; Deshmukh V; Ma J; Tardif V; Lim RK; Pugh HM; Sun Y; Manibusan A; Sellers AJ; Barnett RS; et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2014, 53, 11863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Lu H; Wang D; Kazane S; Javahishvili T; Tian F; Song F; Sellers A; Barnett B; Schultz PG J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135, 13885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Hutchins BM; Kazane SA; Staflin K; Forsyth JS; Felding-Habermann B; Schultz PG; Smider VV J Mol Biol 2011, 406, 595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Hutchins BM; Kazane SA; Staflin K; Forsyth JS; Felding-Habermann B; Smider VV; Schultz PG Chem Biol 2011, 18, 299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Kazane SA; Sok D; Cho EH; Uson ML; Kuhn P; Schultz PG; Smider VV Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109, 3731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Wang L; Zhang Z; Brock A; Schultz PG Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100, 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Axup JY; Bajjuri KM; Ritland M; Hutchins BM; Kim CH; Kazane SA; Halder R; Forsyth JS; Santidrian AF; Stafin K; et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109, 16101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Kim CH; Axup JY; Schultz PG Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013, 17, 412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Lammers C; Hahn LE; Neumann H Chembiochem 2014, 15, 1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Neumann H; Wang KH; Davis L; Garcia-Alai M; Chin JW Nature 2010, 464, 441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Schmied WH; Elsasser SJ; Uttamapinant C; Chin JW J Am Chem Soc 2014, 136, 15577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Low PS; Kularatne SA Curr Opin Chem Biol 2009, 13, 256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Franklin WA; Waintrub M; Edwards D; Christensen K; Prendegrast P; Woods J; Bunn PA; Kolhouse JF Int J Cancer Suppl 1994, 8, 89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Hartmann LC; Keeney GL; Lingle WL; Christianson TJH; Varghese B; Hillman D; Oberg AL; Low PS Int J Cancer 2007, 121, 938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Konner JA; Bell-McGuinn KM; Sabbatini P; Hensley ML; Tew WP; Pandit-Taskar N; Vander Els N; Phillips MD; Schweizer C; Weil SC;et al. Clin Cancer Res 2010, 16, 5288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Parker N; Turk MJ; Westrick E; Lewis JD; Low PS; Leamon CP Anal Biochem 2005, 338, 284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Smith-Jones PM; Pandit-Taskar N; Cao W; O’Donoghue J; Philips MD; Carrasquillo J; Konner JA; Old LJ; Larson SM Nucl Med Biol 2008, 35, 343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Wang ZJ; Boddington S; Wendland M; Meier R; Corot C; Daldrup-Link H Pediatr Radiol 2008, 38, 529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Kularatne SA; Deshmukh V; Gymnopoulos M; Biroc SL; Xia J; Srinagesh S; Sun Y; Zou N; Shimazu M; Pinkstaff J; et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013, 52, 12101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Desgrosellier JS; Cheresh DA Nat Rev Cancer 2010, 10, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Kim CH; Axup JY; Lawson BR; Yun H; Tardif V; Choi SH; Zhou Q; Dubrovska A; Biroc SL; Marsden R; et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110, 17796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).Reubi JC Endocrine Reviews 2003, 24, 389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Bugge TH J Thromb Haem 2012, 10, E26. [Google Scholar]
- (54).Gubareva LV; Kaiser L; Hayden FG Lancet 2000, 355, 827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (55).Ivanov S; Liao SY; Ivanova A; Danilkovitch-Miagkova A; Tarasova N; Weirich G; Merrill MJ; Proescholdt MA; Oldfield EH; Lee J; et al. Am J Pathol 2001, 158, 905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Netzel-Arnett S; Hooper JD; Szabo R; Madison EL; Quigley JP; Bugge TH; Antalis AM Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 2003, 22, 237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Nishizuka Y Nature 1984, 308, 693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Bruno JG; Carrillo MP; Crowell R J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2009, 90A, 1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Bunka DHJ; Platonova O; Stockley PG Curr Opin Pharm 2010, 10, 557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Ireson CR; Kelland LR Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2006, 5, 2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Lee JF; Stovall GM; Ellington AD Curr Opin Chem Biol 2006, 10, 282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Nimjee SM; Rusconi CP; Sullenger BA Ann Rev Med 2005, 56, 555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.