ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE
Evaluate the association of multimorbidity, primary health care model and possession of a private health plan with hospitalization.
METHODS
A population-based cross-sectional study with 1,593 elderly individuals (60 years old or older) living in the urban area of the city of Bagé, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The outcome was hospitalization in the year preceding the interview. The multimorbidity was evaluated through two cut-off points (≥ 2 and ≥ 3). The primary health care model was defined by residence in areas covered by traditional care or by Family Health Strategy. The older adults mentioned the possession of a private health plan. We performed a gross and adjusted analysis by Poisson regression using a hierarchical model. The adjustment included demographic, socioeconomic, functional capacity disability and health services variables.
RESULTS
The occurrence of overall and non-surgical hospitalization was 17.7% (95%CI 15.8–19.6) and 10.6% (95%CI 9.1–12.1), respectively. Older adults with multimorbidity were admitted to hospitals more often when to older adults without multimorbidity, regardless of the exhibition’ form of operation. Having a private health plan increased the hospitalization by 1.71 (95%CI 1.09–2.69) times among residents in the areas of the Family Health Strategy when compared to elderly residents in traditional areas without a private health plan.
CONCLUSIONS
The multimorbidity increased the occurrence of hospitalizations, especially non-surgical ones. Hospitalization was more frequent in older adults with private health plan and those living in Family Health Strategy areas, regardless of the presence of multiple diseases.
Keywords: Aged, Comorbidity, Hospitalization, Prepaid health care plans, Family Health Strategy
RESUMO
OBJETIVO
Avaliar a associação da multimorbidade, modelo de atenção básica e posse de plano de saúde com hospitalização.
MÉTODOS
Estudo transversal de base populacional com 1.593 idosos (60 anos ou mais) residentes na zona urbana do município de Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul. O desfecho foi a hospitalização no ano anterior à entrevista. A multimorbidade foi avaliada por meio de dois pontos de corte (≥ 2 e ≥ 3). O modelo de atenção básica foi definido pela residência em áreas cobertas pela atenção tradicional ou da Estratégia Saúde da Família. A posse de plano de saúde foi referida pelos idosos. Realizou-se análise bruta e ajustada por regressão de Poisson utilizando modelo hierarquizado. O ajuste incluiu variáveis demográficas, socioeconômicas, capacidades funcionais e de serviços de saúde.
RESULTADOS
A ocorrência de hospitalização geral e não cirúrgica foi de 17,7% (IC95% 15,8–19,6) e 10,6% (IC95% 9,1–12,1), respectivamente. Idosos com multimorbidade hospitalizaram mais em comparação com os idosos sem multimorbidade, independentemente da forma de operacionalização da exposição. O plano de saúde aumentou em 1,71 (IC95% 1,09–2,69) vezes a internação hospitalar entre residentes nas áreas da Estratégia Saúde da Família em comparação aos idosos residentes nas áreas tradicionais sem plano de saúde.
CONCLUSÕES
A multimorbidade aumentou a ocorrência de hospitalizações, principalmente aquelas não cirúrgicas. Idosos com plano de saúde e residentes em áreas de Estratégia Saúde da Família internaram mais, independentemente da presença de múltiplas doenças.
INTRODUCTION
Hospitalization is an important resource in older adults care, and it is part of the health care network. Hospitalizations, especially if repeated and prolonged, may produce negative consequences to older patients’ health, such as decreased functional disability, lower quality of life and increased fragility 6 , 7 . Older adults hospitalization should be indicated only when all other actions and services for the proper management of health problems have been exhausted.
Health needs, mainly those expressed by chronic diseases, are one of the main determinants of elderly hospitalization 16 . With the rapid increase – absolute and relative – of the aging population, the prevalence of older adults with multiple chronic problems has reached 60% 11 . Therefore, there is a growing interest in elderly multidimensional assessment and in the implications triggered by multimorbidity for the organization and offer of health actions and services 20 , 26 .
In Brazil, the Ministry of Health adopted the Family Health Strategy (FHS) to reorganize primary health care a , reduce social inequalities and manage the care of older adults in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) 7 . Through the work of a multidisciplinary team, the FHS is responsible for a population assigned to its territory so that it can act on health prevention and promotion, in addition to taking care of demand and provision of supplies. This care model has contributed to the reduction of infant mortality, hospitalizations by primary care-sensitive conditions 21 and even cardiovascular deaths 24 . However, most of the evidence comes from ecological studies, which limits inference about the findings. Regarding the use of health services, findings with individual information show that FHS appears to offer a more suitable and equitable utilization of health services when compared to the traditional model 9 , 25 , but hospitalization related information are rarely found.
There are some studies being done to create instruments for hospitalization prediction in order to organize the work process of the primary health care teams 7 . The avoidable hospitalizations may represent a warning related to the lack of care coordination and the lack of care quality, possibly because of fragmentation when addressing the problems and especially in older adults with multimorbidity 8 , 19 , 26 . In this context, the possession of private health plans, regardless of the user’s needs, seems to be a facilitator of access to hospitalization in Brazil 23 , however, an assessment of the systems’ double coverage is seldom explored by the literature 17 .
Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the association of multimorbidity, primary health care model, and possession of a private health plan with senior hospitalization.
METHODS
A population-based cross-sectional study with data collected between July and November 2008, including individuals 60 years old or older, living in the area covered by the primary health care services of the urban area of the city of Bagé, located on the border of Rio Grande do Sul State with Uruguay. In 2008, Bagé had about 120,000 inhabitants, of whom 84% lived in urban areas. Altogether, there were 20 primary care services, and 15 of them were part of the FHS and five belonged to the traditional model. The FHS had been in the city for five years and covered half of the urban population. The traditional model of primary health care was responsible for the care of the rest of the population. Older adults accounted for approximately 14% of the population. The city had three hospitals (an army hospital not affiliated with SUS) and 470 hospital beds affiliated with SUS (one bed per 3,800 inhabitants) 21 .
The sample size was calculated for a study on home care 25 . Considering 10% of losses and refusals, and a design effect of 1.3, the study had 80% power to detect 1.5 of relative risks and exhibitions that affected at least 4% of the population.
In the sample delimitation, the range of each primary health units was set and subsequently divided into micro areas, with the numeric ID of each block. The starting point of the data collection in each block was selected randomly and each home on the left was eligible, with one in six households being approached. We invited all residents 60 years old or older to participate in the study. The interviews not conducted after three attempts on different days and times were considered losses or refusals.
The interviews were carried out using structured questionnaires with pre-codified questions and applied by trained interviewers to all seniors in the home selected. In the event of partial disability – older adult with communication skills, lucid, oriented, but in need of daily care – family members or the main caregivers provided the answers. Self-reported questions were not applied in the case of total disability – elderly people incapable of communicating, completely reliant on family members or caregivers.
The outcome “hospitalization in the last year” was defined by the question: “Have you been admitted to any hospital in the last year? (yes; no)” In order to specify the outcome, we created a variable that included only non-surgical hospitalizations. The reason for the hospitalization was obtained through information mentioned by the interviewed.
The main independent variable were multimorbidity, primary health care models (traditional and FHS) and possession of a private private health plan. The multimorbidity was measured by 17 health problems: medical diagnosis mentioned by the older adults (systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary problems, heart disease, stroke, rheumatism/arthritis/osteoarthritis, spine problems, cancer, kidney failure); cognitive deficit evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination; Geriatric Depression Scale-evaluated depression; problems mentioned (urinary incontinence, amputation, visual or auditory problems, problem or difficulty chewing food, and falls) 22 . For the multimorbidity’s operation, we added up the health problems and used two categorizations: a) ≥ 2 morbidities; and b) ≥ 3 morbidities. The primary health care model was defined in the sample selection by residence in areas covered by health services 25 . Possession of a private health plan (no; yes) was mentioned by the older individuals.
The variables used to adjustment were: sex (male, female), self-reported skin color (white, black, yellow, brown or indigenous), age (60 to 64, 65 to 69, 70 to 74, 75 years or older), marital status (married or common-law, widowed, single or divorced), retirement (no, yes), years of study (none, one to seven, eight or more), economic classification according to the Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP – A or B [richest]; C; D or E), functional disability for basic activities of daily living (AVD – no, yes) 13 , functional disability to instrumental activities of daily living (AIVD – no, yes) 15 , and home care in the three months preceding the interview (no, yes). For AVD and AIVD, seniors who reported needing help with at least one of the activities were considered disabled.
The analyses included calculations of ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. We performed a crude and adjusted analysis by Poisson regression with a robust adjustment in variance 2 . In the association between hospitalization and multimorbidity, we adjusted for gender, age, skin color, marital status, economic classification, and education. When associating primary health care model and private health plan, we included in the adjustment the disability variables for AVD and AIVD and home care. Saved the limitations of cross-sectional design, functional disabilities are the result of multimorbidity and can affect the use of home care 18 . The health services coverage (primary health care model and private health plan) can mediate or modify the association with hospitalization 17 . Thus, we tested the interaction between primary health care model and private health plan due to a theoretical suspicion of a relationship between these systems the outcome being studied 14 , 17 . Associations with a value of p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using the program Stata, version 12.0 (StataCorp, CollegeStation, TX, USA).
The project was submitted to and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Pelotas (Process 015/08). The ethical principles were assured. All respondents or their guardians signed consent forms.
RESULTS
We interviewed 1,593 older adults. The study showed 4.0% of losses and 3.0% refusals. The prevalence of overall and non-surgical hospitalization was 17.7% (95%CI 15.8–19.6) and 10.6% (95%CI 9.1–12.1), respectively (Table 1). The main causes of hospitalization were: circulatory (30.4%), digestive (16.4%), general (13.3%), respiratory (10.7%), and urinary (7.2%). Of the total, 81.3% (95%CI 79.3–83.3) of the older adults had two or more morbidities and 64.0% (95%CI 61.5–66.4), had three or more morbidities. Half of the sample resided in areas covered by the FHS (Table 1).
Table 1. Description of the sample and multimorbidity and hospitalization prevalence in the elderly population. Bagé, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2008. (N = 1,593).
| Variable | Sample | Multimorbidity (≥ 2) | Multimorbidity (≥ 3) | Hospitalization | Non-surgical hospitalization | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| n | % | % (95%CI) | % (95%CI) | % (95%CI) | % (95%CI) | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 593 | 37.2 | 67.3 (63.4–71.3) | 45.9 (41.7–50.1) | 18.4 (15.3–21.5) | 10.6 (8.1–13.1) |
| Female | 1,000 | 62.8 | 82.1 (80.0–84.6) | 65.3 (62.3–68.4) | 17.3 (15.0–19.6) | 10.6 (8.7–12.5) |
| Skin color | ||||||
| White | 1,252 | 78.6 | 74.7 (72.2–77.2) | 55.1 (52.2–57.9) | 18.2 (16.1–20.4) | 10.4 (8.7–12.1) |
| Black | 139 | 8.7 | 79.8 (72.7–86.9) | 68.5 (60.3–76.8) | 18.0 (11.6–24.4) | 13.8 (8.0–19.5) |
| Brown/Yellow/Indigenous | 202 | 12.7 | 86.2 (81.3–91.2) | 70.4 (63.8–76.9) | 14.4 (9.5–19.2) | 10.1 (5.9–14.2) |
| Age (in completed years) | ||||||
| 60–64 | 400 | 25.1 | 72.4 (68.0–77.0) | 52.0 (46.9–57.0) | 14.3 (10.9–17.7) | 8.4 (5.6–11.1) |
| 65–69 | 374 | 23.5 | 72.1 (67.5–76.8) | 55.4 (50.3–60.6) | 15.8 (12.1–19.5) | 7.5 (4.8–10.2) |
| 70–74 | 322 | 20.2 | 77.7 (73.0–82.5) | 57.8 (52.2–63.4) | 19.9 (15.5–24.3) | 10.7 (7.2–14.1) |
| ≥ 75 | 497 | 31.2 | 83.3 (79.8–86.8) | 66.1 (61.6–70.5) | 20.5 (17.0–24.1) | 14.8 (11.6–17.9) |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married or common-law | 816 | 51.2 | 80.2 (77.4–83.0) | 61.8 (58.4–65.2) | 18.2 (15.5–20.8) | 10.3 (8.2–12.4) |
| Single or divorced | 238 | 15.0 | 79.3 (73.9–84.8) | 60.6 (54.0–67.1) | 16.8 (12.0–21.6) | 10.2 (6.3–14.0) |
| Widowed | 538 | 33.8 | 83.9 (80.6–87.1) | 68.8 (64.7–72.9) | 17.5 (14.3–20.7) | 11.4 (8.7–14.1) |
| Retired | ||||||
| No | 451 | 28.3 | 81.9 (78.2–85.6) | 65.5 (60.9–70.0) | 15.1 (11.8–18.4) | 9.1 (6.4–11.8) |
| Yes | 1,142 | 71.7 | 81.1 (78.7–83.4) | 63.4 (60.4–66.3) | 18.8 (16.5–21.0) | 11.2 (9.4–13.1) |
| Education (in complete years) | ||||||
| None | 372 | 23.7 | 87.1 (83.5–90.7) | 72.1 (67.4–76.9) | 16.9 (13.1–20.8) | 11.4 (8.1–14.6) |
| 1–7 | 858 | 54.5 | 76.9 (74.0–79.9) | 57.3 (53.8–60.7) | 18.7 (16.1–21.3) | 10.3 (8.2–12.3) |
| ≥ 8 | 342 | 21.8 | 64.8 (59.5–70.0) | 45.3 (39.8–50.8) | 16.7 (12.7–20.6) | 10.7 (7.4–14.0) |
| Economic classification | ||||||
| A or B (richest) | 429 | 27.1 | 69.1 (64.6–73.7) | 51.3 (46.3–56.2) | 18.5 (14.8–22.1) | 10.1 (7.2–13.0) |
| C | 615 | 38.9 | 75.1 (71.6–78.7) | 55.7 (51.6–59.8) | 17.9 (14.9–20.9) | 11.1 (8.6–13.6) |
| D or E | 537 | 34.0 | 84.0 (80.8–87.2) | 66.1 (62.0–70.3) | 17.1 (13.9–20.3) | 10.6 (7.9–13.2) |
| Functional disability for AVD | ||||||
| No | 1,424 | 89.4 | 80.1 (78.0–82.2) | 61.8 (59.2–64.3) | 15.5 (13.6–17.3) | 8.5 (7.0–9.9) |
| Yes | 169 | 10.6 | 96.3 (92.7–99.9) | 91.7 (86.4–96.9) | 36.7 (29.4–44.0) | 29.3 (22.3–36.3) |
| Functional disability for AIVD | ||||||
| No | 1,045 | 65.8 | 76.8 (74.1–79.4) | 55.7 (52.6–58.7) | 13.0 (11.0–15.1) | 6.5 (5.0–8.0) |
| Yes | 544 | 34.2 | 91.7 (89.2–94.2) | 82.9 (79.5–86.4) | 26.8 (23.1–30.6) | 18.8 (15.5–22.1) |
| Private health plan | ||||||
| No | 1,025 | 64.6 | 82.8 (80.4–85.2) | 65.6 (62.6–68.7) | 16.1 (13.9–18.4) | 9.8 (7.9–11.6) |
| Yes | 561 | 35.4 | 78.8 (75.3–82.2) | 61.3 (57.1–65.4) | 20.3 (17.0–23.7) | 11.8 (9.1–14.4) |
| Primary health care model | ||||||
| Traditional | 741 | 46.5 | 77.9 (74.8–81.1) | 59.7 (56.0–63.4) | 17.3 (14.5–20.0) | 9.6 (7.4–11.7) |
| FHS | 852 | 53.5 | 84.2 (81.6–86.7) | 67.6 (64.3–70.8) | 18.1 (15.5–20.7) | 11.5 (9.4–13.7) |
| Home care | ||||||
| No | 1,482 | 93.1 | 80.4 (78.3–82.4) | 62.3 (59.7–64.8) | 15.8 (13.9–17.7) | 9.0 (7.5–10.5) |
| Yes | 109 | 6.9 | 96.5 (92.5–100) | 90.6 (84.3–96.8) | 43.1 (33.8–52.5) | 32.4 (23.4–41.4) |
| Total | 1,593 | 100 | 81.3 (79.3–83.3) | 64.0 (61.5–66.4) | 17.7 (15.8–19.6) | 10.6 (9.1–12.1) |
AVD: activities of daily living; DLIA: instrumental activities of daily living; FHS: Family Health Strategy
Almost 2/3 of the sample were women. White skin color was the most mentioned (78.6%). Older adults aged between 60 and 64 years old accounted for 25.1% and those with 75 years or older comprised 31.2% of individuals. Half were married or lived with a partner and 33.8% were widowers. Two-thirds were retirees and most older adults had between one and seven years of education (54.5%) and 23.7% of them had never attended school. The economic classes D/E and C were composed of 34.0% and 38.9% of the older adults, respectively. The occurrence of AVD was 10.6% and 34.2% for AIVD. One-third had a private health plan and 6.9% received home care. The occurrence of hospitalization – overall and non-surgical – was higher among individuals with AVD, with AIVD or receiving home care. The occurrence of hospitalization was similar between the categories of other variables investigated (Table 1).
There was an interaction between the model of primary health care and private health plan, both in the crude analysis (p = 0.004) and adjusted analysis (p = 0.020). In stratified analysis, the occurrence of hospitalization was greater among elderly residents in areas covered by the FHS and with the private health plan, regardless of the presence of multimorbidity (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Prevalence of hospitalization according to the presence of multimorbidity stratified by primary care model and private health plan in the elderly population. Bagé, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2008.
Dotted line: overall hospitalization %
Hospitalizations were more frequent in older adults with multimorbidity. The magnitude of the association was greater for multimorbidity defined by three or more diseases and for nonsurgical hospitalization. On the coverage of health services, in the adjusted analysis, residents in areas covered by the FHS with private health plan had 1.71 (95%CI 1.09–2.69) times more of overall admission and 2.20 (95%CI 1.16–4.19) times more non-surgical hospitalization when compared to seniors living in areas covered by the traditional care model and no health insurance (Table 2).
Table 2. Association between hospitalization, multimorbidity, and health services coverage among older adults. Bagé, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2008. (N = 1,593).
| Variable | Hospitalization | Non-surgical hospitalization | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| Gross analysis | Adjusted analysisc | Gross analysis | Adjusted analysisc | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PR (95%CI) | PR (95%CI) | PR (95%CI) | PR (95%CI) | |
| Multimorbidity (≥ 2)a | p = 0.003 | p = 0.003 | p = 0.003 | p = 0.003 |
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 1.73 (1.21–2.47) | 1.75 (1.21–2.51) | 2.35 (1.35–4.09) | 2.34 (1.34–4.08) |
| Multimorbidity (≥ 3)b | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 |
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 1.83 (1.40–2.40) | 1.94 (1.46–2.56) | 2.87 (1.88–4.39) | 3.10 (2.01–4.80) |
| Primary health care model/Possession of a private health plan | p = 0.002 | p = 0.011 | p = 0.002 | p = 0.021 |
| Traditional/No plan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Traditional/With plan | 0.92 (0.67–1.27) | 1.01 (0.71–1.42) | 0.74 (0.46–1.17) | 0.84 (0.50–1.39) |
| FHS/Without plan | 0.84 (0.64–1.12) | 0.80 (0.58–1.09) | 0.85 (0.59–1.24) | 0.80 (0.51–1.21) |
| FHS/With plan | 1.89 (1.23–2.91) | 1.68 (1.07–2.64) | 2.60 (1.43–4.74) | 2.20 (1.16–4.19) |
PR: prevalence ratio
Reference groups: a 0-1 disease; b 0-2 diseases; c adjusted analysis – multimorbidity: adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic variables; primary health care model/possession of a private health plan: adjustment for sociodemographic, socioeconomic, multimorbidity, functional disabilities and home care variables.
Individuals residing in the areas covered by FHS were poorer, less educated, and had more limitations in ADL and AIVD compared to residents in the traditional model. Possession of a private health plan was 26.7% in the areas covered by FHS, and 45.3% in the traditional model. When stratifying older adults by the model of primary care and private health plan, we observed that richer and more educated older adults resided in traditional areas with the private health plan, followed by residents in areas covered by the FHS with a private health plan (Table 3).
Table 3. Description (%) of socioeconomic characteristics and of the health condition according to the primary health care model and private health plan in the elderly population. Bagé, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 2008.
| Socioeconomic and health condition variables | Traditional | FHS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| No plan | With plan | No plan | With plan | |
| Economic classification | ||||
| A or B (richest) | 21.8 | 54.1 | 10.2 | 43.6 |
| C | 42.4 | 36.6 | 37.9 | 38.7 |
| D or E | 35.7 | 9.3 | 51.9 | 17.8 |
| Education (in complete years) | ||||
| None | 19.4 | 9.6 | 36.1 | 19.0 |
| 1–7 | 60.0 | 44.2 | 56.5 | 55.3 |
| ≥ 8 | 20.6 | 46.2 | 7.5 | 25.7 |
| Multimorbidity (≥ 2) | 80.8 | 74.8 | 84.0 | 84.4 |
| Multimorbidity (≥ 3) | 63.6 | 55.4 | 67.0 | 69.7 |
| AVD | 8.4 | 9.9 | 12.2 | 11.1 |
| AIVD | 29.7 | 28.4 | 39.0 | 37.8 |
FHS: Family Health Strategy; AVD: basic activities of daily living; AIVD: instrumental activities of daily living
DISCUSSION
The multimorbidity increased the occurrence of hospitalizations. Older adults with private health plans and those living in Family Health Strategy areas were admitted more often, regardless of the presence of multiple diseases. Considering the relevance of FHS in organizing the network and coordination of care, the public-private relationships and the impact of chronic diseases in the health system 19 , this is one of the first Brazilian studies with primary data to evaluate the effect of multimorbidity on hospitalization and the role of health services coverage. Most of the existing information in the current literature comes from ecological studies.
The positive association between multiple diseases in the same individual and hospitalization is consistent with literature findings 16 . It is explained by the increased risk of physiological complications arising from diseases. The comparison of the results with different cut-off points for multimorbidity showed that the use of three or more diseases was a richer indicator when predicting hospitalization, reinforcing the use of this cut-off point in the evaluation of multimorbidity in older adults 12 . Nevertheless, these results represent important challenges for elderly care in Brazil, because of the higher the number of diseases, the greater the likelihood of hospitalization. Due to its negative consequences 6 , hospitalization should be used, reinforcing the proper management of multimorbidity in primary health care a and including the residence as a therapeutic environment 19 , 20 , 25 .
Despite the theoretical framework, the actions and services provided by the FHS and the existing of evidence that suggests a care of better quality for the FHS’s chronic problems 19 , this study did not find an isolated effect of this model of care in the association between multimorbidity and hospitalization when compared with the traditional model. This result raises some hypotheses. In the city of study, in 2008, the FHS was not consolidated enough to influence the reduction in elderly hospitalization. It is necessary to emphasize that the implementation of the FHS was being carried out gradually in the city and, on average, the primary health units with FHS had three years of deployment.
In addition, the sources for the literature’s findings indicating the FHS’s positive effect are mostly ecological evidence, which limits causal inference 21 , 23 , 24 . Both studies with individual data, hospital-based and no age restriction showed different results for the hospitalizations due to conditions sensitive to primary health care despite the different forms of assessing the exposure to the FHS. A study performed in the same city as this study found no differences in the likelihood of hospitalizations for primary care-sensitive conditions among the models of care 21 . On the other hand, a study in a city from another region of the country detected a lower ratio of hospitalization for primary care-sensitive conditions among individuals connected to the FHS 10 . Finally, some features of this study may justify the results observed. The FHS assessment was based on residence in the areas of service and not on the connection and regular use of services with this care model. Despite the accountability of the FHS teams by a population assigned to the territory a , this form of operation may have diluted a possible model, because some older adults may not use the FHS service.
Corroborating with the findings of this study, national 3 , 5 and international 27 literature highlights the increase in utilization of services by individuals with a private health plan. However, the plausibility of the findings on the private health plan’s effect on the increase in hospitalization in FHS areas is complex and involves from socio-economic and health condition characteristics up to aspects related to access to hospitalization. Older adults in FHS areas were poorer, less educated, had more functional disabilities and more multimorbidity, which would stimulate a greater demand for care. However, only those who had a private health plan were admitted more often, probably by having easier access to hospitalization 23 , even if the management of a health problem could be performed at home or in outpatient service. In addition, in Brazil, the difficulties in supply and provision of beds in the public health system induce a greater occurrence of hospitalization in the supplementary system, mostly for hospitalization of lesser complexity and lower duration 1 . The hospitalizations paid for by a private health plan went up from 6% in 1981 to 20% in 2008. Meanwhile, the public system financed hospitalizations decreased, and those paid for by direct disbursement remained stable. Still, we must consider the medical option when using a private health plan to accelerate access to diagnostic and therapeutic resources in treatment 10 , especially among people with less purchasing power 21 . The assessment of the private health plan’s role as a facilitator of hospitalization should be deepened, with a focus on the user’s needs and an assessment of the quality provided by the supplementary system.
Despite the small isolated influence of the services in changing the population’s health conditions 4 , multimorbidity can be one of the main focuses for effective action of health systems and services in the short term. Taking into consideration the large population of older adults affected by the problem and the low probability of a quick reduction in multimorbidity, actions must focus on the tertiary and quaternary prevention in order to prevent complications of multiple diseases, iatrogenic and unnecessary use of health services 20 .
Some limitations of the study must be balanced. The cross-sectional design did not allow inferences on the risk of hospitalization, since the hospitalization may have increased the chance of disease diagnosis. The lack of specificity in outcomes that did not distinguish hospitalizations for primary care-sensitive conditions may have hampered the adequate assessment of the association with the care model. In addition, due to the lack of information on financing and access to hospitalization, it was not possible to obtain more details about the trajectory of access to hospitalization, especially among the FHS’s older adults – poorer and the main unique users of the public health system 23 .
The lack of identification of the FHS’s effect on the association between multimorbidity and hospitalization reinforces the need for future studies at an individual level, with longitudinal information that also includes questions about the lack of access to hospitalization, the effective connection with the FHS and hospitalizations for primary care-sensitive conditions. The findings indicate the relevance of multimorbidity in the event of hospitalization and can contribute to improvements in the care model for older adults in Brazil.
Footnotes
Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. Política Nacional de Atenção Básica. Brasília (DF); 2012 [cited 2017 Feb 15]. (Série E. Legislação em Saúde). Available from: http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/publicacoes/geral/pnab.pdf
REFERENCES
- 1.Bahia L, Simmer E, Oliveira DC. Cobertura de planos privados de saúde e doenças crônicas: notas sobre utilização de procedimentos de alto custo. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2004;9(4):921–929. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232004000400013. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. 21BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blay SL, Fillenbaum GG, Andreoli SB, Gastal FL. Equity of access to outpatient care and hospitalization among older community residents in Brazil. Med Care. 2008;46(9):930–937. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318179254c. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318179254c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carvalho AI, Buss PM. Determinantes sociais na saúde, na doença e na intervenção. In: Giovanella L, Escorel S, Lobato LVC, Noronha JC, Carvalho AI, organizadores, translators. Políticas e sistema de saúde no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2008. pp. 121–142. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Castro MSM, Travassos C, Carvalho MS. Fatores associados às internações hospitalares no Brasil. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2002;7(4):795–811. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232002000400014. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Creditor MC. Hazards of hospitalization of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(3):219–223. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00011. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-118-3-199302010-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dutra MM, Moriguchi EH, Lampert MA, Poli-de-Figueiredo CE. Validade preditiva de instrumento para identificação do idoso em risco de hospitalização. Rev Saude Publica. 2011;45(1):106–112. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102011000100012. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011000100012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Facchini LA, Silveira DS, Duro SMS, Saes MO, Nunes BP, Volz PM, et al. Sousa MF, Franco MS, Mendonça AVM. Saúde da família nos municípios brasileiros: os reflexos dos 20 anos no espelho do futuro. Campinas: Saberes; 2014. Os sentidos da pesquisa nos processos organizativos da Estratégia Saúde da Família; pp. 844–892. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Facchini LA, Piccini RX, Tomasi E, Thumé E, Silveira DS, Siqueira FV, et al. Desempenho do PSF no Sul e no Nordeste do Brasil: avaliação institucional e epidemiológica da Atenção Básica à Saúde. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2006;11(3):669–681. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232006000300015. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fernandes VBL, Caldeira AP, Faria AA, Rodrigues JF., Neto Internações sensíveis na atenção primária como indicador de avaliação da Estratégia Saúde da Família. Rev Saude Publica. 2009;43(6):928–936. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009005000080. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fortin M, Stewart M, Poitras ME, Almirall J, Maddocks H. A systematic review of prevalence studies on multimorbidity: toward a more uniform methodology. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(2):142–151. doi: 10.1370/afm.1337. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harrison C, Britt H, Miller G, Henderson J. Examining different measures of multimorbidity, using a large prospective cross-sectional study in Australian general practice. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e004694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004694. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardizes measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC. Essential medical statistics. 2. Malden: Blackwell Science; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186. Part 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, Heinrich S, Corrieri S, Luppa M, et al. Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(4):387–420. doi: 10.1177/1077558711399580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558711399580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lima-Costa MF, Turci MA, Macinko J. Estratégia Saúde da Família em comparação a outras fontes de atenção: indicadores de uso e qualidade dos serviços de saúde em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29(7):1370–1380. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2013000700011. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2013000700011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mendes EV. O cuidado das condições crônicas na atenção primária à saúde: o imperativo da consolidação da estratégia da saúde da família. Brasília (DF): Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 2012. [cited 2017 Feb 19]. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/cuidado_condicoes_atencao_primaria_saude.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moraes EN. Atenção à saúde do Idoso: aspectos conceituais. Brasília (DF): Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 2012. [cited 2017 Feb 19]. http://apsredes.org/site2012/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Saude-do-Idoso-WEB1.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nedel FB, Facchini LA, Martín-Mateo M, Vieira LAS, Thumé E. Family Health Program and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Southern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2008;42(6):1041–1052. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000600010. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102008000600010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nunes BP, Thumé E, Facchini LA. Multimorbidity in older adults: magnitude and challenges for the Brazilian health system. 1172BMC Public Health. 2015;15 doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2505-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2505-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Paim J, Travassos C, Almeida C, Bahia L, Macinko J. The Brazilian health system: history, advances, and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377(9779):1778–1797. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60054-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rasella D, Harhay MO, Pamponet ML, Aquino R, Barreto ML. Impact of primary health care on mortality from heart and cerebrovascular diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of longitudinal data. g4014BMJ. 2014;349 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4014. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thumé E, Facchini LA, Wyshak G, Campbell P. The utilization of home care by the elderly in Brazil’s primary health care system. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(5):868–874. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.184648. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2009.184648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Veras RP, Caldas CP, Motta LB, Lima KC, Siqueira RC, Rodrigues RTSV, et al. Integration and continuity of Care in health care network models for frail older adults. Rev Saude Publica. 2014;48(2):357–365. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004941. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang HHX, Wang JJ, Lawson KD, Wong SYS, Wong MCS, Li FJ, et al. Relationships of multimorbidity and income with hospital admissions in 3 health care systems. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(2):164–167. doi: 10.1370/afm.1757. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]