Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry logoLink to Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
. 2016 Aug 4;32(3):266–274. doi: 10.1007/s12291-016-0600-y

Mutation Analyses in Selected Exons of the MUT Gene in Indian Patients with Methylmalonic Acidemia

Chandrawati Kumari 1, Seema Kapoor 1,, Bijo Varughese 1, Sunil Kumar Pollipali 1, Siddarth Ramji 2
PMCID: PMC5538998  PMID: 28811685

Abstract

Deficiency or diminished activity of a cobalamin dependent enzyme methylmalonyl-CoA mutase causes inborn error of metabolism called methylmalonic acidemia (MMA). In this study we elucidated the spectrum of mutations in 21 Indian mut MMA patients by direct sequencing. Sequence analysis identified a total of 70 mutations in exon 2, 9, 11 and 12 of MUT gene. Out of which 26 mutations were predicted to be deleterious and rest were benign. The 23 novel mutations consist of four nonsense mutations (p.N6*, p.G539*, p.E609* and p.I671*), twelve missense mutations (p.K128I, p.N547T, p.D554Y, p.A558T, p.R559P, p.A631T, p.I647T, p.E656D, p.V657E, p.Q660H, p.K679N, and p.G696Y) and seven frame shift mutations (c.375_376insA, c.1642delA, c.1655delC, c.1825_1826insT, c.1957delGA, c.2014delA and c.2062_2063insGA). All of them are point mutations or micro rearrangements. Three of these mutations (p.K621N, p.G648D, p.G630E) have been previously reported; all of them are missense mutations. The mutations are distributed throughout the exon 2, 9, 11 and 12, 38.4 % mutation are located in exon 12.

Keywords: MUT gene, Methylmalonic acidemia, Mutation analysis, GCMS, LCMSMS, Vitamin B12 deficiency

Introduction

Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) is the commonest organic acidemia in which the concentration of methylmalonic acid is massively increased in the blood, urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Approximately 60 % cases of MMA are caused due to the mutation in MUT gene which causes mut° variant of methylmalonic acidemia (MMA; MIM # 251000), an autosomal recessive disorder. It is caused by inherited defects in the methylmalonyl-CoA mutase enzyme (MCM) (EC 5.4.99.2). The MUT gene encoding this enzyme has been mapped to chromosome 6p12–21.2 [1]. It contains 13 exons spanning over 35 kb of genomic DNA [2] and is transcribed in the nucleus as a 2.8-kb mRNA. In mitochondrial matrix, 32 amino acid mitochondrial leader sequence is cleaved by a peptidase to form mature subunit(718 amino acids), two subunits than assemble to form a homodimer with ~78 kD subunits that binds two molecules of adenosylcobalamin (AdoCbl) to form the active holoenzyme [3, 4].

There have been reports of specific mutations among various ethnic groups or hotspots, including p.G717V in African-Americans [5] and p.E117X in Japanese patients [6]. Six mutations p.L494X, p.R93H, p.E117X, p.R369H, p.G648D, and c.385 + 5G>A were identified in another Japanese population [7]. The mutation p.N219Y was identified in five unrelated families of French and Turkish descent as well as in other populations [8] and p.R108C has been noted in Hispanic individuals [9]. Mutation p.R369C occurs in diverse populations [10].A splice-site mutation IVS8 + 3A→G recurs in the Arab-Moslem population [11]. Worgan et al. identified exons 2, 3, 6 and 11 as mutation clusters while Acquaviva et al. found 67 % mutations were located in exon 2, 3, 11 and 12 [8, 12]. Studies on Indian patients are scarce in published literature.

We sequenced exon 2, 9, 11 and 12 of the MUT gene to detect the hotspot of mut° variant of MMA patients and to examine the spectrum of mutations in these specific exons in our population. Structural modeling was also done to elucidate the effect of substitution in the structure of protein.

Materials and Methods

In this study, 21 apparently unrelated MMA patients were studied. All patients with available clinical information had been symptomatic during their neonatal or infantile periods. There were no consanguineous marriages among the parents of these patients. The diagnoses of Methylmalonic acidemia were confirmed by presence of highly elevated urinary methylmalonic acid by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. These diagnoses were re-confirmed using tandem mass spectrometry (LCMSMS) by seeing elevated level of propionylcarnitine (C3), C3:C2 levels and methionine in patients dried blood spots. However no enzyme assay was available to confirm the diagnosis. For mutation study, we collected blood samples of patients in a EDTA containing tube. The Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi has approved this study and consent of parents of the patients has taken before the study was carried out.

Direct Sequencing of the Amplified DNA

The genomic DNA was extracted from the two ml venous blood of the patient by phenol chloroform method [13]. The genomic DNA isolated was used for amplification of exon 2, 9, 11 and 12 of MUT gene using PCR method. For every DNA sample four 50 μl PCR reaction mixture were prepared containing specific set of primers for amplifying the desired exon. The reaction mixture in every tube contained 1 X PCR buffer containing 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs (nucleotides), 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.2-U Taq DNA polymerase, and 0.5 μg of DNA. Samples were overlaid with 50 µl mineral oil and subjected to amplification in a thermal cycler. A four step PCR was performed in a thermal cycler using specific PCR conditions. Table 1 showing the sequence of primers used for the amplification along with their annealing temperature. The band size and amplification of PCR products were evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1). Then PCR products were directly sequenced using Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyser. Both forward and reverse sequencing of the target exons were carried out to rule out any sequence artifacts. The sequences were then explored using the Geospiza’s Finch TV and NCBI nucleotide BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool). Figure 2 showing exon and intron showing various mutations and the partial nucleotide alignment of the exon 12 of MCM for the studied patients.

Table 1.

Showing the sequence of primers along with their annealing temperature and band size of each exon

Exon Primer no. Sequence Anneal temp. (°C) No. of cycles Band size (bp)
2 112 5′-CAG GGT TTT TAT AGT CAT TA-3′ 54 30 500
70* 5′-AGC TCC TAT TCC ACC CCT CTT C-3′
9 9-1 5′CCTTTCCTTGACTTTTTC3′ 53 40 250
9-2* 5′TGCTGTCATCATTTTACTAC3′
11 11-1 5′ACTTGAAGATTTGCTGTG3′ 48 30 325
11-2* 5′TGCTGTCATCATTTTACTAC3′
12 12-1 5′CAGGGTTTTTATAGTCATTA3′ 49.1 30 250
12-2* 5′CAAGATTCCCATCACAGT3′

* Reverse primer

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Gel picture of amplified exons (2, 9, 11, 12) and ladder of 50 bp showing the band size. M = 50 bp ladder molecular marker, lane 1 exon 2, lane 2 exon 9, lane 3 exon 11 and lane 4 exon 12

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Diagram of exon and intron showing various mutations and partial nucleotide alignment of the exon 12 of MCM for the studied patients, positions of individual mutations are indicated by arrow mark. Row 1 homo sapiens, row 2–13 studied patients and row 14 consensus sequence

We screened 40 controls for mutations in order to distinguish between polymorphism and mutation in our population. The common mutations and variants reported so far were filtered using Exome aggregation consortium (ExAc) data and the human gene mutation database (HGMD). The mutation nomenclature used in this study follows the guidelines of den Dunnen and Antonarakis [14] using GenBank accession no. NG_007100.1 as the reference genomic sequence that cover MUT transcript NM_000255.3.

Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlation

It is very important to find out the genotypic and phenotypic correlation of these mutations to classify them as benign or potentially deleterious. Here we used three softwares PolyPhen-2, PROVEAN and SIFT for predicting the effect of mutation in the proteins structure and function [1517]. HumVar dataset was used to predict the effect of substitution on structure of protein analyzed by PolyPhen-2 software. It consists of all the 13,032 human disease causing mutations from UniPort and 8946 human nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) without annotated involvement in disease, that were treated as non damaging [17]. Mutation taster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) was used for analyzing nonsense and silent mutations [18].

Structural Modeling

To determine the effect of mutations in protein structure, three dimensional structural modelization was done. For this sequence files are processed with sequence analysis software and all the illustrations have been prepared using molecular visualization software Pymol.

Results

All the patients with available clinical information had been symptomatic during their neonatal or infantile periods. As initial clinical findings, symptoms such as global developmental delay (63 %), lethargy (48 %), vomiting (37 %) and seizures (37 %) were most frequent followed by poor feeding and hypotonia which were relatively common (26 % respectively). Family history of a similarly affected sibling was noted in 4 % cases. The most common laboratory finding at the onset of disease was abnormal lactate (37 %) followed by hyperammonemia (30 %), abnormal MRI (26 %), acidosis (11 %) and ketosis (7 %).

The diagnoses of Methylmalonic acidemia were confirmed by elevated levels of methylmalonic acid in urine in GCMS analysis. These diagnoses were re-confirmed using LCMSMS by seeing elevated level of propionylcarnitine (C3), C3/C2 ratio and methionine levels in patients dried blood spots (Table 2).

Table 2.

Depicts the deleterious mutations found and levels of methylmalonic acid, C3, C3/C2 ratio, methionine and scores of Polyphen, SIFT and PROVEAN of each mutation in each patient

ID Age at diagnosis/gender Presenting symptoms Mutation 1 (Polyphen PROVEAN and SIFT score) Mutation 2 (Polyphen PROVEAN and SIFT score) Urinary MMA concentration LCMSMS findings
C3 level C3/C2 ratio Methionine
1 52 h/female Lethargy, poor intake, respiratory distress, hyperammonemia and metabolic acidosis p.V657Ea
0.963
−3.59
0.000
p.Q660Ha
0.572
−3.92
0.021
10,981.0 10.4 0.88 25.3
2 6 years/male Global developmental delay, seizure, regression of milestones, hyperammonemia and metabolic acidosis c.375_376insA (p.N126Ka)
0.998
−4.36
0.003
p.K128Ia
0.815
−2.88
0.000
9810.86 13.3 0.37 13.2
3 1 year/male Global developmental delay, seizure p.K621N
Benoist et al. [22]
1.000
−4.90
0.000
p.G648D
Crane and Ledley [26]
0.999
−6.50
0.000
5764.90 6.2 0.68 23.2
4 2½ months/male Lethargy, poor intake, failure to thrive c.1957delGA (p.T653La)
0.998
−5.88
0.000
9305.00 8.2 0.76 12.3
5 9 months/female Global developmental delay, hypotonia, failure to thrive p.I647Ta
0.858
−3.89
0.001
8688.70 8.2 0.78 15.6
6 4 months/female Lethargy, poor intake, failure to thrive c.1825_1826insT (p.E609Va)
0.025
−4.63
0.015
4280.94 8.0 0.56 22.1
7 1 year/male Global developmental delay, seizure p.E609*a 2807.12 8.9 0.65 27.3
8 6 months/male Global developmental delay p.K679Nb
0.772
−3.50
0.021
7948.06 8.8 0.52 12.1
9 6 years/male Vomiting, poor intake, regression of milestone p.D554Yb
0.829
−4.09
0.001
p.E656Db
0.791
−2.91
0.001
2435.65 8.2 0.25 11.4
10 2 months/male Lethargy, poor intake, p.N6*a 3245.45 8.0 0.45 13.5
11 2 year/male Global developmental delay, lethargy, hyperammonemia, metabolic acidosis p.Q660Ha
0.572
−3.92
0.021
p.I671*a 5006.65 8.1 0.56 17.3
12 2 years/male Global developmental delay, Abnormal body movements c.1642delA (p.I548Sa)
0.974
−3.50
0.000
p.D554Yb
0.829
−4.09
0.001
181,949.59 13.3 1.0 12.7
13 5 years/female Global developmental delay c.2062_2063insGA (p.E688 Gb)
0.511
−4.10
0.025
3865.99 7.2 0.27 38.9
14 5 months/male Seizure, lethargy, hyperammonemia c.2014delA (p.S672Ab)
1.000
−2.94
0.001
p.G696Yb
1.000
−7.49
0.000
7190.30 8.3 0.65 19.3
15 1 year/male Global developmental delay, p.A558Ta
0.606
−2.14
0.038
5494.49 7.3 0.43 11.2
16 2 months/male Vomiting, lethargy, poor intake p.G539*a 3792.78 7.5 0.29 30.1
17 1 year/female Poor intake, vomiting and dystonia p.G630E
Crane and Ledley [26]
1.000
−7.84
0.000
p. A631T
0.987
−3.32
0.002
7874.99 8.0 0.56 21.9
18 5 years/female Regression of milestone, hearing and visual defects, dystonia, poor intake c.1655delC (p.A552Ea)
0.993
−4.07
0.000
p.R559Pa
0.999
−6.86
0.000
15,599.0 9.9 0.56 12.6
19 1 year/female Vomiting, dystonia, failure to thrive p.N547Ta
1.000
−5.88
0.000
13,061.1 8.8 0.89 22.1

aHomozygous mutation, b Heterozygous mutation

Out of 21 patients whose DNA sample has been sequenced 19 patients had deleterious mutations; two patients had only benign mutation. It is likely that deleterious mutations are present in some other exons or noncoding or regulatory regions of the MUT gene in these two patients. The biochemical results for all the patients were indicative of mutase deficiency.

A total of 70 mutations were observed in the four exons. 12 (17.1 %) out of 70 were silent mutation. 38 (54.2 %) mutations are missense mutation. 16 (22.8 %) mutations accounted for frame shift mutations that are caused due to deletion or insertion of the nucleotide. Only 4 (5.7 %) mutations were nonsense mutations. Out of 70 mutations 37.1 % (26 of 70) were predicted probably damaging and rest were predicted benign. Most of the mutations that have deleterious effect on phenotype are located in exon 12 (38.4 %, 10 of 26) followed by exon 9 (26.9 %, 07 of 26), exon 11 (23.0 %, 06 of 26) and exon 2 (11.5 %, 03 of 26). Out of these 26 mutation 23 were novel mutations and only 3 were previously reported. Table 2 is showing the deleterious mutations and levesl of methylmalonic acid, C3, C3/C2 ratio, methionine and scores of Polyphen, SIFT and PROVEAN of each mutation in each patient.

Structural modelization shows that most of the mutations are located in C-terminal cofactor-binding domain (Fig. 3). Most of the missense mutations mapped on the MUT structure (except Ala631) were located far-off from the active site. The substitution of native amino acids induce steric clash in the surrounding area as a result disturbs the interactions with the neighbouring amino acid residues and thus affect the stability of the protein structure.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Overall architecture of the enzyme methylmalonyl-CoA mutase with bound Cobalamin (Vitamin B12) in the catalytic centre and the structural locations of the observed missense mutations. b Native valine-657 substituted with longer and polar glutamate. c Native Arg-559 substituted with smaller and non-polar proline

Discussion

To date near about 200 mutations have been identified in Methylmalonic acidemia patients that are reported in Human gene mutation database (www.hgmd.cf.au.uk) [19]. A total of 70 mutations were identified in 21 patients. The mutation types were missense mutations (38/70, 54.2 %); frame shift mutations (16/70, 22.8 %); silent mutations (12/70, 17.1 %) and nonsense mutations (4/70, 5.7 %). Twenty-six (37.1 %) out of 70 mutations were predicted deleterious and 43 (61.4 %) were predicted benign. Most of these deleterious mutations were located in exon 12 (10/26, 38.4 %) followed by exon 9 (7/26, 26.9 %), exon 11 (6/26, 23.0 %) and exon 2 (3/26, 11.5 %).

A previous study stated that more than 75 % of the mut° mutations belong to the barrel domain and missense mutations were the highest contributors for these mutations [8]. In this study we found 61.5 % (16/26) of these mutations belongs to the cobalamin binding domain (exon 11 and 12) while missense mutations are the highest contributors.

Another study found that 54 % mutations results in a premature termination of the amino acids [20]. We found only 38.4 % (10/26) mutations results in a premature termination of the amino acids. In some previous studies they got large genomic deletions including entire exon 12 in the mut° mutations [8, 12, 20, 21]. We didn’t found any such large deletions; most of our mutations are point mutations or micro-rearrangements.

Acquaviva et al. stated that 67 % of the mutations are located in exons 2, 3, 11 and 12, which account for only 46 % of the coding sequences. They observed that nonsense mutations are restricted to the first eight exons. Worgan et al. [12] found that exons 2, 3, 6 and 11 harbored the most mutations. The spectrum or distribution of mutations in our study was much closer to the study done by Acquaviva as 73 % of the mutations were located in exons 2, 11, and 12 and only 26.9 % mutations were located in exon 9; however our study is restricted to four exons only. The distribution of the different types of mutations was not homogeneous in all exons.

Four novel nonsense mutations (Table 2) were detected in four patients. Three of which (p.G539*, p.E609* and p.I671*) are located downstream to exon 8. The insertion of thymine between nucleotide 15 and 16 in exon 2 introduces an early termination codon at position 6 (p.N6*) within the mitochondrial targeting sequences. Mutation in this part of exon produces an enzyme that does not reach to its target site as a result enzyme activity reduces. These mutations within the mitochondrial targeting sequence could produce truncated protein, which do not express enzyme activity because the key portion of the amino terminus mature apoenzyme was lacking [3]. The substitution of nucleotide guanine to thymine at position 1615 in exon 9 introduces a termination codon at position 539 (p.G539*) within the linker sequence. This mutation also produces a truncated peptide that contain only the (β,α)8 barrel domain. Mutations (p.E609*) and (p.I671*) are located in the cofactor binding domain and may alter the correct binding of the cofactor. The mutation (p.E609*) is resulted due to insertion of thymine between nucleotide 1824 and 1825 which introduces a termination codon at position 609. The mutation (p.I671*) is due to deletion of nucleotide adenosine at position 2011 that introduces stop codon at position 671 (p.I671*).

Seven novel frame shift mutations were detected in our patients. The frame shift mutation consist of two single nucleotide insertion (c.375_376insA and c.1825_1826insT), three single nucleotide deletions (c.1642delA, c.1655delC and c.2014delA),one insertion of two nucleotide (c.2062_2063insGA) and one deletion of two nucleotide (c.1957delGA). The three other frame shift mutations lead to introduction of termination codon: c.15_16insT in exon 2 (p.N6*), c.1824_1825insT in exon 11 (p.E609*) and c.2011delA in exon 12 (p.I671*).

Twelve novel missense mutations were found (p.K128I, p.N547T, p.D554Y, p.A558T, p.R559P, p.A631T, p.I647T, p.E656D, p.V657E, p.Q660H, p.K679N, and p.G696Y). These mutations alter the folding or structural stability of the protein as most of these are located in the secondary structure comprising of C terminal (βα)5 barrel (cobalamin binding domain). There were four mutations located in linker sequences encoded by exon 9. Mutation in this region can cause the absence of C terminal (βα)5 barrel (cobalamin binding domain) in the polypeptide chain.

Mutations p.K5N, p.R532L, p.E531D and p.M608L were predicted benign. These mutations are likely to be recurrent instead of hereditary. We found that various mutations occurred in close vicinity, in the same or nearby nucleotides, suggesting that these areas are hotspots for mutational events. In many cases this can be due to the presence of CpG dinucleotide, a mutational hotspot. The codon 532 was subjected to five different mutations-c.1524C>T (p.R532C), c.1525G>A (p.R532H), c.1524_1525delinAT (p.R532I), c.1524_1525delCG (p.R532L) and c.1524C>A (p.R532S). The codon 608 has also two mutations-c.1822A>C (p.M608L), c.1822_1823delinsTC (p.M608S) and codon 609 has three mutations-c.1825G>A (p.E609K), c.1825_1826insT (p.E609V) and c.1824_1825insT (p.E609*).

The sixteen mutations were located in sequences that code for the cofactor binding domain (one main structural domain) of the enzyme, with a heterogeneous distribution between exons 11 and 12. These mutations involve residues that lie at the surface of the cofactor crevice and may alter the contacts with the cofactor-binding domain or conformation of the crevice [22]. Most of the mutations are private mutations. There are many ethnic specific mutations documented in the published literature. The mutation p.G171V was a common mutation in black patients [5]. This mutation was present in 41 % of black patients. Likewise mutation p.R108C was seen in 60 % of Hispanic patients [12]. Two mutations p.G544X and p.G427D were present only in Asian patients [23]. The mutation p.N219Y was the first frequent mutation reported in Caucasian population [24], p.E117X in Japanese patients [6], c.671_678dup in Spanish patients [20] and c.1595G>A, c.2011A>G (p.I671V) in Filipino patients [25]. In our patients only one mutation c.2011A>G (p.I671V) which was specific for Filipino patients was present. This mutation was present in 52.3 % patients. It was difficult to correlate the clinical features with genotype, as most of the mutations were compound heterozygous and are novel.

One patient carrying mutations p.G630E and p.A631T in two consecutive amino acids in the polypeptide chain (Table 2). Substitution of glycine at position 630 results in the more severe mut° phenotype [26].This portion of protein consists of histidine loop. The histidine loop is a conserved structure that contains a consensus motif (DXHXXG) for cobalamin cofactor binding in enzymes [27]. These two mutations block the binding of adenosylcobalamin to methylmalonyl-CoA mutase by occluding the tail binding pocket.

The mutation p.G648D affects the histidine loop that leads to impaired function of cobalamin binding domain. Drennan et al. [27] stated that interactions between the histidine loop and the cobalamin are important both for catalysis and for binding of the cofactor. By molecular modeling they demonstrated that mutations involve the substitution of glycine within cobalamin binding domain by a large amino acid interferes stearically with the fit of the cobalamin tail into the B-fold of the cobalamin binding domain [27]. In mutation p.G696Y glycine has been substituted so it is likely that it also interferes with the fit of the cobalamin tail.

We have also observed some common polymorphism in our patients which were reported in literature. Three common polymorphism p.R532H [28], p.A664A [12] and p.I671V [29] were present in our patients. Substitution of guanine to adenosine at position 15 in exon 2 results into a silent mutation p.K5K [30]. This mutation was previously reported in Egyptian patient. This mutation was present in our one patient. The mutation p.K128K, located in the exon two is the most common mutation observed in our patients.

3D model of the human MCM enzyme and the structural locations of the observed missense mutations showing that most of them are located in C-terminal cofactor binding domain followed by interdomain linker sequence and N-terminal substrate binding domain.

In mutation p.V657E, mutant residue glutamate is longer as well as negatively charged as compared with native valine residue. Moreover the hydrophobic valine is buried and surrounded by other hydrophobic residues. The presence of a charged and longer glutamate in hydrophobic area will push the surrounding residues apart. This substitution will induce steric clash in the surrounding area which is adjacent to the catalytic centre.

In mutation p.R599P, the substitution of arginine with smaller and non-polar proline will disturb polar interactions with the amino acid residues like Glu205 and Glu168 present in the neighbouring secondary structure and thus affect the stability of the protein structure. The broader proline is also making steric clashes with the neighbouring amino acid residues.

Conclusion

The spectrum of mutation included 38 missense mutations (54.2 %), 16 frameshift mutations (22.8 %), 12 silent mutations (17.1 %) and 4 nonsense mutations (5.7 %). All of them were point mutations or microrearrangements. Although the mutations were distributed throughout exons 2,9,11 and 12, 29.5 % of them were located in exon 9, 27.1 % in exon 12, 24.2 % in exon 2 and 18.5 % in exon 11. Nonsense mutations were distributed equally (1/4, 25 %) in each exon. In the same way, 34.2 % (13/38) of missense mutations were located in exon 9. Frame shift mutations were equally distributed in exon 2 and 9 (31.2 %, 5/16) followed by exon 12 (25.0 %, 4/16) and exon 11 (12.5 %, 2/16). Most of the mutations are private mutations while few occur recurrently. Mutations p.K5N, p.K128K, p.R532L, p.E531D and p.I671V were the most frequent mutations.

The impact of amino acid substitution on protein structure and function was predicted by analysis of multiple sequence alignments and protein 3-D structure. We found that most of the mutations that are deleterious to protein function and structure were located on exon 12 followed by exon 9, exon 11 and exon 2. In this study, nonsense mutations constituted 5.7 % of mutations, missense mutations constituted 17.1 % of mutations and 10 % of mutations are frameshift mutations. Although mutations are present in all four exons, most of the mutations that are deleterious to protein function were located on exon 12 (10 of 26, 38.4 %). Most of the mutations in our study were compound heterozygous as seen in methylmalonic acidemia. A total of 26 deleterious mutations identified. Three of them (p.K621N, p.G648D and p.G630E) are known mutations and 23 was novel mutations identified, contributing to existing database. We did not find any hotspot as the study subjects were less in number. To determine ethnic specific mutations in Indian patients further research is needed in a large number of patients.

Funding

This study was funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Ledley FD, Lumetha MR, Zoghbi HY, Van Tuinen P, Ledbetter SA, Ledbetter DH. Mapping of human methylmalonyl CoA mutase (MUT) locus on chromosome 6. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;42(6):839–846. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nham SU, Wilkemeyer MF, Ledley FD. Structure of the human methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (MUT) locus. Genomics. 1990;8(4):710–716. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(90)90259-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jansen R, Ledley FD. Heterozygous mutations at the mut locus in fibroblast with mut0 methylmalonic academia identified by polymerase-chain-reaction cDNA cloning. Am J Hum Genet. 1990;47(5):808–814. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thoma NH, Leadlay PF. Homology modeling of human methylmalonyl-CoA mutase:a structural basis for point mutations causing methylmalonic aciduria. Protein Sci. 1996;5(9):1922–1927. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560050919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adjalla CE, Hosack AR, Gilfix BM, Lamothe E, Sun S, Chan A, et al. Seven novel mutations in mut methylmalonic aciduria. Hum Mutat. 1998;11(4):270–274. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)11:4<270::AID-HUMU3>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ogasawara M, Matsubara Y, Mikami H, Narisawa K. Identification of two novel mutations in the methylmalonyl-CoA mutase gene with decreased levels of mutant mRNA in methylmalonic academia. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3(6):867–872. doi: 10.1093/hmg/3.6.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kobayashi A, Kakinuma H, Takahashi H. Three noval and six common mutations in 11 patients with methylmalonic acidemia. Pediatr Int. 2006;48(1):1–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2006.02174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Acquaviva C, Benoist JF, Pereira S, Callebaut I, Koskas T, Porquet D, et al. Molecular basis of methylmalonyl-CoA mutase apoenzyme defect in 40 European patients affected by mut° and mut—forms of methylmalonic academia: identification of 29 novel mutations in the MUT geneet. Hum Mutat. 2005;25(2):167–176. doi: 10.1002/humu.20128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Niles KM, Worgan L, Tirone JC, Hoffman A, Morgan K, Verner A et al. The spectrum of mutations in mut methylmalonic aciduria and identification of a common Hispanic mutation and haplotype (abstract). In: 54th Annual Meeting The American Society of Human Genetics, Toronto; 2004. p. 326.
  • 10.Jung JW, Hwang IT, Park JE, Lee EH, Ryu KH, Kim SH, et al. Mutation analysis of the MCM gene in Korean patients with MMA. Mol Genet Metab. 2005;84(4):367–370. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Berger I, Shaag A, Anikster Y, Baumgartner ER, Bar-Meir M, Joseph A, et al. Mutation analysis of the MCM gene in Israeli patients with mut° disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;73:107–110. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2001.3166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Worgan LC, Niles K, Tirone JC, Hofmann A, Verner A, Sammak A, et al. Spectrum of mutations in mut methylmalonic acidemia and identification of a common Hispanic mutation and haplotype. Hum Mutat. 2006;27:31–43. doi: 10.1002/humu.20258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kirby KS. A new method for the isolation of ribonucleic acids from mammalian tissues. Biochem J. 1956;64:405–408. doi: 10.1042/bj0640405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Den Dunnen JT, Antonarakis SE. Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum Mutat. 2000;15(1):7–12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200001)15:1<7::AID-HUMU4>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan AP. Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitution and indels. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46688. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ng Pauline C, Henikoff Steven. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3812–3814. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schwarz JM, Rodelsperger C, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat Methods. 2010;7:575–576. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0810-575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fowler B, Leonard JV, Baumgartner MR. Causes of and diagnostic approach to methylmalonic acidurias. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2008;31(3):350–360. doi: 10.1007/s10545-008-0839-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Martinez MA, Rincon A, Desviat LR, Merinero B, Ugarte M, Perez B. Genetic analysis of three genes causing isolated methylmalonic academia: identification of 21 novel allelic variants. Mol Genet Metab. 2005;84(4):317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu Mei-Ying, Liu Tze-Tze, Yang Yang-Ling, Chang Ying-Chen, Fan Ya-Ling, Lee Shu-Fen, et al. Mutation profile of the MUT gene in Chinese methylmalonic aciduria patients. JIMD Rep. 2012;6:55–64. doi: 10.1007/8904_2011_117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Benoist JF, Acquaviva C, Callebaut I, Guffon N, Oqier de Baulny H, Mornon JP, et al. Molecular and structural analysis of two novel mutations in a patient with mut-methylmalonyl-CoA deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;72:181–184. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2000.3122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Champattanachai V, Ketudat Cairns JR, Shotelersuk V, Keeratichamroen S, Sawangareetrakul P, Srisomsap C, et al. Novel mutations in a Thai patient with methylmalonic acidemia. Mol Genet Metab. 2003;79(4):300–302. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7192(03)00106-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Acquaviva C, Benoist JF, Callebaut I, Guffon N, Ogier de Baulny H, Touati G, et al. N219Y, a new frequent mutation among mut (degree) forms of methylmalonic acidemia in Caucasian patients. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(8):577–582. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Silao CLT, Hernandez KN, Canson DM, Estrada SC, Chiong MAD, Cutiongco-de la Paz E, et al. Molecular analysis of the MUT gene in Filipino patients with methylmalonic acidemia. Acta Med Philipp. 2009;43(1):29–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Crane AM, Ledley FD. Clustering of mutations in methylmalonyl CoA mutase associated with mut-methylmalonic acidemia. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;55(1):42–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Drennan CL, Huang S, Drummond JT, Matthews RG, Lidwig ML. How a protein binds B12: a 3.0 A X-ray structure of B12-binding domains of methionine synthase. Science. 1994;266(5191):1669–1674. doi: 10.1126/science.7992050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Crane AM, Jansen R, Andrews ER, Ledley FD. Cloning and expression of a mutant methylmalonyl coenzyme A mutase with altered cobalamin affinity that causes mut-methylmalonic aciduria. J Clin Investig. 1992;89:385–391. doi: 10.1172/JCI115597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vatanavicharn N, Champattanachai V, Liammongkolkul S, S P, Keeratichamroen S, Cairns JRK, et al. Clinical and molecular findings in Thai patients with isolated methylmalonic acidemia. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;106(4):424–429. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ghoraba DA, Mohammed MM, Zaki OK. Mutation analysis of methylmalonyl CoA mutase gene exon 2 in Egyptian families: identification of 25 novel allelic variants. Meta Gene. 2015;3:71–88. doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2014.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES