Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Nov 9;5(45):e01092-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01092-17

Genome Sequences of 12 Cluster AN Arthrobacter Phages

Julia Y Lee-Soety a, Shantanu Bhatt a, Tamarah L Adair b, J Alfred Bonilla c, Karen K Klyczek c, Melinda Harrison d; Saint Joseph’s University SEA-PHAGES; Baylor University SEA-PHAGES; University of Wisconsin-River Falls SEA-PHAGES; Cabrini University SEA-PHAGES, Rebecca A Garlena e, Charles A Bowman f, Daniel A Russell e, Welkin H Pope e, Deborah Jacobs-Sera e, Steven G Cresawn g, Graham F Hatfull e,
PMCID: PMC5679792  PMID: 29122859

ABSTRACT

Twelve siphoviral phages isolated using Arthrobacter sp. strain ATCC 21022 were sequenced. The phages all have relatively small genomes, ranging from 15,319 to 15,556 bp. All 12 phages are closely related to previously described cluster AN Arthrobacter phages.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Arthrobacter spp. are soil bacteria useful for bioremediation and their ability to metabolize hydrocarbons (1, 2). The more than 40 bacteriophage genomes of Arthrobacter hosts are diverse, forming 10 clusters (AK to AU) and 2 singletons (3). Ten cluster AN phages previously described are of interest in that they each have a relatively small genome (15.3 to 15.6 kbp) for phages with a siphoviral morphology (3). They are closely related to each other at the nucleotide level, even though they were isolated in geographically distinct locations (3).

We have isolated and characterized 12 bacteriophages that infect Arthrobacter sp. strain ATCC 21022 (4). All the phages were isolated from soil samples by students in the Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) program (5) at nine different locations (Table 1) using an enrichment procedure, except for phage Lore, which was isolated by direct plating. They have a siphoviral morphology with a relatively small isometric head (39 ± 7 nm diameter) and a noncontractile tail (98 ± 15 nm).

TABLE 1 .

Cluster AN Arthrobacter phages

Phage name GenBank accession no. Genome length (bp) G+C content (%) No. of genes Location of isolation
Chestnut KY434670 15,556 60.1 26 Radnor, PA
Courtney3 KX443695 15,556 60.1 26 Katy, TX
Elkhorn MF140409 15,556 59.6 26 Waco, TX
KylieMac MF140415 15,540 59.8 27 Waco, TX
Link MF140417 15,521 60.2 26 Waco, TX
Lore MF140419 15,556 59.6 26 Waco, TX
Mariposa MF140420 15,556 60.1 26 Downingtown, PA
Massimo KX576642 15,556 60.1 26 Camp Hill, PA
Prospero KX610765 15,556 60.1 26 Vineland, NJ
Seume MF140426 15,319 60.3 26 Somerset, WI
Taj14 MF140431 15,546 59.9 26 Missoula, MT
TinoCrisci MF140433 15,556 60.1 26 Devon, PA

Phage genomes were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform at either the North Carolina State University Genomic Sciences Laboratory or the Pittsburgh Bacteriophage Institute using 150-bp unpaired reads. Sequences were assembled using Newbler, generating major contigs with coverage from 2,032- to 12,826-fold. The genomes are similarly sized (15.3 to 15.6 kbp) with similar G+C content (~60%), and all have a defined end with 11-base 3′ single-stranded DNA extensions (right end, 5′-CCCGCGCCACC) (Table 1). All of the phages are closely related to other cluster AN phages (6), with >85% pairwise average nucleotide sequence identities, spanning >95% of their genome lengths. Genomes were annotated using DNA Master (cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu) with coding sequences predicted by GeneMark (7) and Glimmer (8), and 26 to 27 protein-coding genes were identified (Table 1). No tRNA or transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) genes were detected by Aragorn (9) or tRNAscan-SE (10).

Except for a single leftward-transcribed gene in each genome (e.g., Courtney3 21), all the genes are transcribed rightward. These include virion structure and assembly genes, including the terminase large subunit, portal, tape measure protein, minor tail protein, and fused capsid-protease genes. These are followed by a lysis cassette in which peptidase and amidase functions are encoded by two separate genes, and four genes coding for predicted DNA binding proteins with predicted helix-turn-helix DNA binding motifs, and an HNH endonuclease. We did not identify genes coding for DNA replication or DNA metabolism functions, and it is unclear how replication is initiated or regulated. The primary difference in gene content among the 12 phage genomes is a small gene (e.g., Courtney3 2) located near the genome left end that is absent from phages KylieMac, Seume, and Taj14. None of the phages encode integrases or partitioning systems, and there is no evidence that any form stable lysogens. Although we predict that a programed translational frameshift plays a role in expression of the tail assembly chaperones—a well conserved feature of the Siphoviridae (11)—the position of the putative frameshift is not readily apparent from bioinformatic analyses.

Accession number(s).

GenBank accession numbers are provided in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Howard Hughes Medical Institute grant 54308198 to G.F.H.

We thank the HHMI SEA-PHAGES program for support and the students of the SEA-PHAGES programs at Baylor University, Cabrini University, Saint Joseph’s University, and the University of Wisconsin-River Falls (student contributors are listed at https://seaphages.org/media/GA_authors/GA1_Students_9-1-17.pdf). We thank Karen Snetselaar at Saint Joseph’s University and the Characterization Facility at the University of Minnesota for electron microscopy.

Footnotes

Citation Lee-Soety JY, Bhatt S, Adair TL, Bonilla JA, Klyczek KK, Harrison M, Saint Joseph’s University SEA-PHAGES, Baylor University SEA-PHAGES, University of Wisconsin-River Falls SEA-PHAGES, Cabrini University SEA-PHAGES, Garlena RA, Bowman CA, Russell DA, Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Cresawn SG, Hatfull GF. 2017. Genome sequences of 12 cluster AN Arthrobacter phages. Genome Announc 5:e01092-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01092-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.O’Loughlin EJ, Sims GK, Traina SJ. 1999. Biodegradation of 2-methyl, 2-ethyl, and 2-hydroxypyridine by an Arthrobacter sp. isolated from subsurface sediment. Biodegradation 10:93–104. doi: 10.1023/A:1008309026751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Silva VP, Moreira-Santos M, Mateus C, Teixeira T, Ribeiro R, Viegas CA. 2015. Evaluation of Arthrobacter aurescens strain TC1 as bioaugmentation bacterium in soils contaminated with the herbicidal substance terbuthylazine. PLoS One 10:e0144978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Klyczek KK, Bonilla JA, Jacobs-Sera D, Adair TL, Afram P, Allen KG, Archambault ML, Aziz RM, Bagnasco FG, Ball SL, Barrett NA, Benjamin RC, Blasi CJ, Borst K, Braun MA, Broomell H, Brown CB, Brynell ZS, Bue AB, Burke SO, Casazza W, Cautela JA, Chen K, Chimalakonda NS, Chudoff D, Connor JA, Cross TS, Curtis KN, Dahlke JA, Deaton BM, Degroote SJ, DeNigris DM, DeRuff KC, Dolan M, Dunbar D, Egan MS, Evans DR, Fahnestock AK, Farooq A, Finn G, Fratus CR, Gaffney BL, Garlena RA, Garrigan KE, Gibbon BC, Goedde MA, Guerrero Bustamante CA, Harrison M, Hartwell MC, Heckman EL. 2017. Tales of diversity: genomic and morphological characteristics of forty-six Arthrobacter phages. PLoS One 12:e0180517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2016. Complete genome sequence of Arthrobacter sp. ATCC 21022, a host for bacteriophage discovery. Genome Announc 4(2):e00168-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00168-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SC, Findley AM, Gissendanner CR, Golebiewska UP, Guild N, Hartzog GA, Grillo WH, Hollowell GP, Hughes LE, Johnson A, King RA, Lewis LO, Li W, Rosenzweig F, Rubin MR, Saha MS, Sandoz J, Shaffer CD, Taylor B, Temple L, Vazquez E, Ware VC, Barker LP, Bradley KW, Jacobs-Sera D, Pope WH, Russell DA, Cresawn SG, Lopatto D, Bailey CP, Hatfull GF. 2014. A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. mBio 5:e01051-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01051-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. GeneMark: Web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–W454. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. 2005. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS Web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W686–W689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xu J, Hendrix RW, Duda RL. 2004. Conserved translational frameshift in dsDNA bacteriophage tail assembly genes. Mol Cell 16:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES