Skip to main content
ACS Central Science logoLink to ACS Central Science
. 2017 Nov 10;3(11):1140–1142. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00517

Immunity to α-Gal: Toward a Single-Antigen Pan-Vaccine To Control Major Infectious Diseases

Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz †,‡,§,*, José de la Fuente ∥,⊥,*
PMCID: PMC5704288  PMID: 29202015

Infectious diseases constitute a growing burden for human health worldwide. In particular, vector-borne diseases account for 17% of all infectious diseases and kill about 1 million people annually.1 These diseases are caused by a diverse group of pathogens including viruses, bacteria, and protozoa that are transmitted by arthropod vectors such as ticks, mosquitoes, sandflies, kissing bugs, and tsetse flies.1 Among the nonviral vector-borne diseases, malaria, leishmaniasis, Chagas disease, sleeping sickness, and Lyme disease represent the highest burden to human health. Further, vaccines are not available for the prevention and control of these diseases.2 Among non-vector-borne diseases, tuberculosis caused by mycobacteria of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex is one of the world’s most common causes of death from infectious diseases.3

All pathogens producing these deadly diseases have something in common: the galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) epitope exposed on their surface (Table 1). During evolution, humans lost the ability to synthesize the carbohydrate α-Gal, which resulted in an almost unique capacity to produce high antibody titers against α-Gal.4 The immunity to α-Gal may neutralize the pathogens with α-Gal on their surface, and therefore the induction of this protective immune response may constitute an effective intervention for the prevention and control of infectious diseases.5 The study of the anti-α-Gal immunity will provide the basis to develop a single-antigen “pan-vaccine” to control major infectious diseases.

Table 1. Presence of α-Gal in Vector-Borne Pathogens and Vaccine Availability.

pathogens vectors diseases vaccinea presence of α-Gal refs
Plasmodium falciparum mosquitoes malaria no yes (4)
Leishmania infantum sandflies visceral leishmaniasis no yes (6)
Leishmania amazonensis sandflies cutaneous leishmaniasis no yes (6)
Trypanosoma brucei tsetse flies sleeping sickness no yes (11)
Trypanosoma cruzi kissing bugs Chagas disease no yes (12)
Borrelia burgdorferi ticks Lyme disease no yes unpublished
a

Based on WHO data.2

The paper recently published by Moura et al.6 shows that vaccination with α-Gal protects against cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis in the α-galactosyltransferase knockout mouse model designed to reproduce the anti-α-Gal response observed in humans. This work extends previous results showing that anti-α-Gal antibodies induced by α-Gal protect against Trypanosoma cruzi and Plasmodium spp.4,7 In particular, Yilmaz et al.4 showed that the anti-α-Gal immunity blocks the transmission of Plasmodium spp. by Anopheles mosquitoes and targets Plasmodium sporozoites in the skin but not in the blood. Thus, the protective effect of anti-α-Gal antibodies was exerted in the dermis, via a complement-mediated mechanism that was no longer effective once sporozoites reach the blood.4 Additionally, Moura et al.6 showed that the anti-α-Gal immunity protects against Leishmania spp. challenge by decreasing parasite infection in the liver and spleen. These results support the efficacy of immunization with α-Gal against pathogens with α-Gal on their surface causing three of the most prevalent vector-borne diseases: malaria, leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease (Table 1). Interestingly, Yilmaz et al.4 showed that not only immunization with α-Gal but also gut colonization by the human pathobiont Escherichia coli O86:B7, producing α-Gal on its surface, induces a protective anti-α-Gal immunity against Plasmodium transmission. These results confirmed that the production of natural anti-α-Gal antibodies is induced in response to gut microbiota bacteria and suggested that human microbiota composition may be associated with the incidence of malaria by an α-Gal-mediated mechanism.8 Curiously, recent reports showed that the risk of P. falciparum infection is associated with gut microbiota composition in malaria-endemic regions.9 Evidence of the role of the anti-α-Gal immunity can be noted in epidemiological studies. For instance, blood type B individuals produce less anti-α-Gal antibodies; in turn, the frequency of this blood type is positively associated with higher incidence rates of malaria and tuberculosis in endemic regions.10 In addition to vector-borne pathogens (Table 1), Mycobacterium spp. were also found to produce α-Gal on their surface.10

Collectively, these results suggest that the way forward to control major infectious diseases is the development and testing of probiotic-based vaccines containing bacteria with membrane-exposed α-Gal.5 The antibody response to α-Gal would be effective against various pathogens that contain α-Gal on their surface (Figure 1). Therefore, the use of probiotic-based vaccines exploiting this major evolutionary adaptation may constitute an effective strategy to reduce the impact of infectious diseases and improve human health worldwide. Furthermore, if effective, these vaccines constitute an affordable and orally administered intervention that could be easily used in the world’s poorest countries.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Immunization with the carbohydrate α-Gal could protect against Trypanosoma, Leishmania, Plasmodium, and Mycobacterium pathogens. Alternatively, probiotic bacteria producing α-Gal could be used to develop a probiotic-based vaccine.

References

  1. WHO. Vector-borne diseases: Fact sheet No. 387 2014; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs387/en/ (accessed Oct 9, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO. A global brief on vector-borne diseases; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2014. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/111008/1/WHO_DCO_WHD_2014.1_eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed Oct 9, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO. Tuberculosis Fact sheet No. 104 2015; World Health Organization: 2017. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/ (accessed July 2, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. Yilmaz B.; Portugal S.; Tran T. M.; Gozzelino R.; Ramos S.; Gomes J.; Regalado A.; Cowan P. J.; d’Apice A. J.; Chong A. S.; Doumbo O. K.; Traore B.; Crompton P. D.; Silveira H.; Soares M. P. Gut microbiota elicits a protective immune response against malaria transmission. Cell 2014, 159, 1277–1289. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabezas-Cruz A.; Valdés J. J.; de la Fuente J. Control of vector-borne infectious diseases by human immunity against α-Gal. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2016, 15, 953–955. 10.1080/14760584.2016.1181547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moura A. P. V.; Santos L. C. B.; Brito C. R. N.; Valencia E.; Junqueira C.; Filho A. A. P.; Sant’Anna M. R. V.; Gontijo N. F.; Bartholomeu D. C.; Fujiwara R. T.; Gazzinelli R. T.; McKay C. S.; Sanhueza C. A.; Finn M. G.; Marques A. F. Virus-like Particle Display of the α-Gal Carbohydrate for Vaccination against Leishmania Infection. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 1026–1031. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Almeida I. C.; Milani S. R.; Gorin P. A.; Travassos L. R. Complement-mediated lysis of Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes by human anti-alpha-galactosyl antibodies. J. Immunol. 1991, 146, 2394–2400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Galili U.; Mandrell R. E.; Hamadeh R. M.; Shohet S. B.; Griffiss J. M. Interaction between human natural anti-alpha-galactosyl immunoglobulin G and bacteria of the human flora. Infect. Immun. 1988, 56, 1730–1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yooseph S.; Kirkness E. F.; Tran T. M.; Harkins D. M.; Jones M. B.; Torralba M. G.; O’Connell E.; Nutman T. B.; Doumbo S.; Doumbo O. K.; Traore B.; Crompton P. D.; Nelson K. E. Stool microbiota composition is associated with the prospective risk of Plasmodium falciparum infection. BMC Genomics 2015, 16, 631. 10.1186/s12864-015-1819-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cabezas-Cruz A.; Mateos-Hernández L.; Alberdi P.; Villar M.; Riveau G.; Hermann E.; Schacht A. M.; Khalife J.; Correia-Neves M.; Gortazar C.; de la Fuente J. Effect of blood type on anti-α-Gal immunity and the incidence of infectious diseases. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017, 49, e301. 10.1038/emm.2016.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zamze S. E.; Ashford D. A.; Wooten E. W.; Rademacher T. W.; Dwek R. A. Structural characterization of the asparagine-linked oligosaccharides from Trypanosoma brucei type II and type III variant surface glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 20244–20261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Couto A. S.; Gonçalves M. F.; Colli W.; de Lederkremer R. M. The N-linked carbohydrate chain of the 85-kilodalton glycoprotein from Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes contains sialyl, fucosyl and galactosyl (alpha 1–3)galactose units. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1990, 39, 101–7. 10.1016/0166-6851(90)90012-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Central Science are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES