Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2018 Mar 9;9:422. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00422

Prospects of Nanostructure Materials and Their Composites as Antimicrobial Agents

Anupriya Baranwal 1, Ananya Srivastava 2, Pradeep Kumar 3,*, Vivek K Bajpai 4, Pawan K Maurya 5, Pranjal Chandra 1,*
PMCID: PMC5855923  PMID: 29593676

Abstract

Nanostructured materials (NSMs) have increasingly been used as a substitute for antibiotics and additives in various products to impart microbicidal effect. In particular, use of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) has garnered huge researchers' attention as potent bactericidal agent due to the inherent antimicrobial property of the silver metal. Moreover, other nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, graphene, chitosan, etc.) have also been studied for their antimicrobial effects in order ensure their application in widespread domains. The present review exclusively emphasizes on materials that possess antimicrobial activity in nanoscale range and describes their various modes of antimicrobial action. It also entails broad classification of NSMs along with their application in various fields. For instance, use of AgNPs in consumer products, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in drug delivery. Likewise, use of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) and titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) as additives in consumer merchandises and nanoscale chitosan (NCH) in medical products and wastewater treatment. Furthermore, this review briefly discusses the current scenario of antimicrobial nanostructured materials (aNSMs), limitations of current research and their future prospects. To put various perceptive insights on the recent advancements of such antimicrobials, an extended table is incorporated, which describes effect of NSMs of different dimensions on test microorganisms along with their potential widespread applications.

Keywords: nanostructured material, antimicrobial activity, cytotoxicity, human health, antimicrobial agent

Introduction

Microbial contamination even today is amongst primal causes of morbidity and mortality across the globe. According to reports, about half of the population in developing countries are infested with microbial contamination and annually more than 3 million people die because of it (Armentano et al., 2014). Despite spectacular advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, microbial infections continue to affect biomedical and healthcare sectors due to the emergence of resistance against several available antibiotics (Murphy, 1994; Desselberger, 2000). Numerous factors including but not limited to human lifestyle changes, industrialization, civil wars, and microbial genome alterations have been recognized for their involvement in emergence or re-emergence of pathogens (Morse, 2001). Keeping this serious issue in consideration, development of better antimicrobial drugs has become highly imperative. Other than aforementioned issue, microbes are also known for deteriorating textiles, spoiling food products, contaminating surgical instruments and causing the damage to crops. The available conventional solutions to avert these problems are not sufficient enough, therefore, development of better alternatives is highly sought to secure the basic living standard of human beings.

Recent advances in nanostructure-based antimicrobial medications have unveiled novel prospects to combat drug resistance in microbes. Therefore, usage of NSM as an antimicrobial agent in both particle and composite form has gained enormous importance in recent years. Application of NSM in biomedical domain relies on a number of unique properties viz. optical, physical, chemical, thermal, electrical, etc. Some of these unique properties play a crucial role in providing medical relevance to the NSM while, the other properties enable them to have significance in other industries (Dakal et al., 2016). The pivotal characteristics that an aNSM should preferably possess are broad-spectrum effect, inexpensive, high specificity, and least or negligible susceptibility toward resistance development (Beyth et al., 2015). Both inorganic and organic NSMs have shown antimicrobial effects over a wide range of microbial strains (Dastjerdi and Montazer, 2010; Li et al., 2011; Latif et al., 2015), paving way for their potential applications in textile industry (Dastjerdi and Montazer, 2010), food packaging and processing industry (Duncan, 2011), agricultural products and crop safety (Khot et al., 2012), water treatment (Li et al., 2008), and construction industry (Lee et al., 2010) to prevent damages associated with microbial growth.

In this review, we have presented a broad classification of NSMs produced via. different synthetic approaches along with an overview of the nanomaterials which possess antimicrobial activity. Though, it is practically impossible to present a comprehensive overview on all NSMs including their method of synthesis, characterization techniques, and mode of antimicrobial activity in this review. However, we have tried to present a report which clearly heralds the current scenario of application of aNSMs in widespread domains along with inadequacies of current research and future prospects of NSMs as antimicrobial agents.

Classification of nanostructured materials

A wide variety of materials exist today that is colloquially considered as NSMs, but the term NSM validates only those materials which belong to 1–100 nm range. NSMs may exhibit large particle size (>100 nm) when they combine with other materials (like polymers, biomolecules, other NSMs, etc.) to form composite NSM or when they exist in the form of aggregates (Bhushan, 2010). NSMs are broadly classified into three categories, which are further classified into different sub-categories (Figure 1i). The inorganic NSMs include nanosheets (a 2-D nanostructure whose thickness lies in the nano range), metal and metal oxide nanoparticle (particles whose diameter is usually <100 nm), nanoshells (typically, spherical nanoparticles with a dielectric core enclosed inside thin metallic shell), nanowires (wire exhibiting diameter/thickness of few nanometers), nanocrystals (material composed of atoms aligned in single- or poly-crystalline arrangement with its one dimension usually <100 nm), quantum dots (3-D nanocrystals composed of semiconducting material with their diameter lying in 2–10 nm range), and carbon nanotubes (cylindrical carbon nanostructures with unusual properties). Organic NSMs comprise of dendrimers (3-D, hyperbranched, tree-like polymeric nanostructures), liposomes (nano-vesicles obtained from hydration of dry phospholipids), and nano/micro capsules (material composed of natural or synthetic polymer shells in order to enclose different active materials, such as drugs, catalysts, biomolecules, etc. as its core) (Dastjerdi and Montazer, 2010). These organic NSMs usually act as a carrier of inorganic nanoparticles and provide a wide range of biomedical applications. Figure 1ii shows morphological features of NSMs which exist in varied forms.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(i) Illustration representing classification of nanostructured materials used as antimicrobials and (ii) depiction of various forms of nanostructured materials and their morphology.

Various synthetic approaches are available today that can be employed to generate NSMs. Conventional synthetic approaches include physical and chemical processes; however, biological processes are one of the newer approaches to allow synthesis of NSMs. In certain cases, especially invasive biomedical application of NSMs, biological approaches (microbe or plant extract assisted) become a method of choice over other conventional approaches because these (biological) approaches do not elicit cellular toxicity (Ahmed et al., 2016; Baranwal et al., 2016).

Antimicrobial nanostructured materials

Antimicrobial effect of NSMs has been widely studied by several research groups against a wide range of microorganisms. NSMs can be regarded as the next generation antibiotics as they possess remarkable potential to overcome multidrug resistance problems in the pathogenic microbes. Depending on their ability to provide biostatic and biocidal action against microbial species, they can also be exploited in healthcare and personal care products, food safety, crop protection, water treatment, textile industries, etc. Although NSMs have shown spectacular antimicrobial effect against more than 500 microbial species, however, accurate mechanism behind their microbicidal activity is not hitherto well-understood (Beyth et al., 2015). Nonetheless, some widely accepted modes of mechanisms of antimicrobial action (Figure 2) are discussed in the following section.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Various modes of microbial toxicity caused by nanostructured materials.

Mechanisms of microbial toxicity

Electrostatic attraction between cationic NSM and anionic microbial cell membrane instigates adhesion of NSMs onto the cell wall or cell membrane which leads to cytosol shrinkage and detachment of the membrane, and eventually cell wall rupture (Dakal et al., 2016). Adhesion of NSM in some cases is followed by its penetration across the cell membrane where, it binds with biomolecules (DNA, protein, and lipids) and cause damage to them which thus, hamper crucial pathways and result in microbial cell death (Li et al., 2008). Apart from electrostatic attraction, the interaction of sulfur groups present in cell wall proteins and NSM leads to irreversible changes in the cell wall structure which subsequently disturbs the lipid bilayer integrity and increases the membrane permeability (Ghosh et al., 2012). Further modes of antimicrobial action of NSM involve the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which cause increase in oxidative stress inside microbial cells. The increased levels of ROS and other free radicals result in mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction and irreversible damage to biomolecules that subsequently cause genotoxic effects (Huang et al., 2008; Dizaj et al., 2014). NSMs, especially nanoparticles modulate microbial signal transduction pathways by causing de-phosphorylation of tyrosine residues on crucial proteins and thus, impart their antimicrobial effect (Dakal et al., 2016).

Current scenario of antimicrobial nanostructured materials' applications

A wide range of NSMs, such as metal and metal oxide nanoparticles, NCH, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), organic nanoparticles (ONPs), etc. have found their usage in widespread domains of consumer products, food safety, agricultural products, crop protection, and industrial processes (waste water treatment, architectural/construction material, etc.). Such examples of NSMs along with their dimension analysis, antimicrobial effect on test microorganisms, and potential applications thereof has been discussed comprehensively in Table 1. This table has been complied by including reports published between year 2007 and 2018 explicitly. Though there are several reports of NSMs being used in commercial products, however, their exact nano-formulation is not disclosed anywhere, most likely due to trade-secret constraints. Some of the commercial examples of aNSM based products are nasiol® AntiMoss protection, nasiol® HomeWood protection (https://nasiolgulf.com/), I-canNano metal paints, and I-canNano fillers (https://www.icannanopaints.com/), NanoSeal™ NanoPack (Duncan, 2011), 4Care Lenscare nano-Behälter, Acticoat Antibacterial barrier, JR Nanotech SoleFreshT nanosilver socks, and Miradent Miradent gelée toothpaste and mouth wash (Wijnhoven et al., 2010). Following section exclusively deals with applications of aNSMs in aforementioned domains.

Table 1.

Different nanostructured materials and composites with their antimicrobial effect against selected strains and potential applications in different fields.

Nanostructured materials and composites Size/diameter (nm) Test microbial organisms Effect of nanostructured material Potential industrial applications References
ZnO nano needle ca. 63 Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Aspergillus niger Successful inhibition of test microbes was observed Functional building material Singh et al., 2018
Nano-liposomal formulation of mupirocin NR Neisseria gonorrhoeae Highly efficacious antibacterial activity was observed Next generation antibiotics Cern et al., 2018
Chitosan (CS) functionalized polyaniline-polypyrrole copolymer 200 E. coli and E. agglomerans Excellent antimicrobial activity against bacterial strains Biomedical devices, water filters, and instrument preparation Kumar et al., 2017
Graphene oxide-chitosan (CS-GO) nanocomposite NR E. coli and B. subtilis Efficient bacterial inactivation was observed Food packaging Grande et al., 2017
Polypyrole/Cu-doped ZnO nanocomposite 24 E. coli and B. subtilis Successful inhibition of test microbes was observed Environmental pollution monitoring Khan et al., 2017
ZnO-NP coated cotton composites 8–12 E. coli, S. aureus, C. albicans, and Microsporum canis Successful inhibition of test microbes was observed Textile industry El-Nahhal et al., 2017
Fe2O3-NPs 24 Bacillus cereus and Klebsiella pneumonia High antibacterial activity was evident Antimicrobial and biomedical applications Ansari et al., 2017
AgNPs 20–30 E. coli, B. subtilis, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans Highest sensitivity was evident for E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans Textile industry Khatoon et al., 2017
ZnO-ZnS@polyaniline nanocomposite NR E. coli High antibacterial activity was evident Waste water treatment Anjum et al., 2017
AgNPs 20–30 E. coli and S. aureus Diminished bacterial growth was evident Portable water filters, medical devices, food packaging, clothing, washing machine and refrigerator coating, and storage containers Andrade et al., 2016
AgNPs 13.56–18.33 Candida albicans Successful inhibition of growth of C. albicans Antifungal medication against urinary tract infection (UTI) Oves et al., 2016
Hydroxyapatite—AgNP composite NR E. coli and S. aureus Effective inhibition of bacterial strains even at low concentrations of AgNPs Medical implants and dental applications Andrade et al., 2016
Cobalt doped ZnO-NP 20.5–25.7 Shigella dysenteriae, Salmonella typhi, Vibrio cholerae and E. coli Effective bactericidal effect against Vibrio cholerae and E. coli was observed Waste water treatment Oves et al., 2015
PEGylated Ag- Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) nanocomposite NR P. aeruginosa and S. aureus Synergistic antibacterial effect of AgNP and GQD was observed Next generation antibiotics Habiba et al., 2015
AuNP stabilized liposome NR S. aureus Successful antibacterial action was evident Antibacterial agent and Drug delivery Gao et al., 2014
(GQD) 20–67 Methicillin-resistant S. aureus and E. coli Selective antibacterial photodynamic effect of GQD was evident Next generation antibiotics Ristic et al., 2014
AgNP-graphene oxide (GO) Nano-sheets composite 2–25 S. aureus and B. subtilis Nanocomposite resulted in complete loss of bacterial stains Next generation antibiotics Das et al., 2013
AuNPs 45–75 Puccinia graminis tritci, A. flavus, A. niger and C. albicans Effective inhibition of test fungal strains was evident Antifungal medication Jayaseelan et al., 2013
AgNPs wrapped in carbon (GO) nano-scrolls (composite) 30–50 C. albicans and C. tropicalis Prolonged and enhanced antifungal activity was evident for nano-scrolls Next generation antibiotics, medical, and health care products Li et al., 2013
CuNP 2–350 C. albicans Strong antifungal activity was evident Dental materials Usman et al., 2013
ZnO-NP 25 and 40 S. aureus, S. marcescens, and P. mirabilis Prominent inhibition of the bacterial strains Antimicrobial creams, lotions and ointments, sunscreen lotions, deodorants, ceramics, and self-cleaning glass Gunalan et al., 2012
CuO-NP 20–21 E. coli, P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, and S. aureus Effective inhibition of test bacterial strains was evident Next generation antibiotics Azam et al., 2012
TiO2-NP/ZnO nano-wire nanocomposite 50–100 C. albicans TiO2-NP assisted in providing enhanced antifungal activity of ZnO nano-wire Next generation antifungal agent Haghighi et al., 2011
CNT doped TiO2 thin film (nanocomposite) 5–30 E. coli Photo-inactivation of the test organism was seen Solar disinfection systems, antimicrobial surface coatings, anti- biofouling membranes, and wastewater treatment Akhavan et al., 2010
iPP/TiO2/Ag nanocomposites NR Bacterial spp. High percentage of biostatic efficiency was observed Textile industry Dastjerdi et al., 2010
AuNPs 22–52 E. coli and S. aureus High antibacterial activity was observed Next generation antibiotics Rai et al., 2010
Zinc oxide quantum dots (Zn-QD) 5 L. monocytogenes, E. coli, and S. enteritidis Dose dependent antibacterial activity was observed Wound dressings Jin et al., 2009
Nanodarts and SWNT 0.83 and 5–50 E. coli, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, and S. aureus Nanodarts showed strong antibacterial activity than SWNT Medical devices, anti-biofouling membranes, and wastewater treatment Liu et al., 2009
CuO-NPs 20–95 Meticillin-resistant S. aureus, S. epidermidis, Proteus spp., E. coli, and P. aeruginosa CuO-NPs successfully inhibited growth of test bacterial strains including Meticillin-resistant S. aureus Next generation antibiotics, biosensing Ren et al., 2009
AgNPs stabilized in highly branched polymer 1.4–7.1 A. niger Prominent antifungal effect was evident Bone cement Zhang et al., 2008
AuNPs stabilized in hyper branched polymer 7.7–3.9 B. subtilis, E. coli, and K. mobilis Considerable antibacterial activity was observed Antibiotic drug delivery system Zhang et al., 2008
PAMAM dendrimer NR S. aureus and P. aeruginosa Better inhibition of P. aeruginosa was evident Antibacterial agent and antibiotic drug delivery system Calabretta et al., 2007
SWNT 0.9 E. coli Strong antibacterial effect was observed Water disinfection, architectural material, anti- biofouling membranes, and wastewater treatment Kang et al., 2007
Nanofibers with embedded AgNPs 200–550 E. coli and P. aeruginosa Enhanced antibacterial effect was evident in case of functionalized PAN nanofibers Water treatment, medical, and health care products Lala et al., 2007
Open in a new tab

NR. not reported.

Metal/metal oxide nanoparticles

Amongst different types of metal nanoparticles (MNPs), AgNPs have witnessed their usage at much wider scale. Currently, they have been used in more than 100 consumer products for imparting antimicrobial effect, starting from storage wares, textiles, nutritional additives to kitchen appliance surface coatings, hospital consumables and wares, etc. (Li et al., 2008). The mechanism behind their microbicidal action is mostly accredited to release of Ag+ ions, cell membrane or cell wall damage, disruption of electron transport and signal transduction pathway, and damage to cellular DNA and proteins due to ROS (Dakal et al., 2016; Qayyum et al., 2017). AuNPs are one of the most valuable antibacterial agents due to their biocompatibility, higher potential of functionalization, and ease of detection. The mechanism behind antibacterial effect of AuNP is not yet fully explored; however, there have been reports of bacterial damage due to modification in membrane potential, loss of ATPs (Cui et al., 2012; Abdel-Raouf et al., 2017), and ROS generation (Zheng et al., 2017). Like other MNPs, copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) have also shown excellent antimicrobial activity and changes in the morphology of microbial cell is suggested to be the plausible cause of their biocidal action (Bogdanović et al., 2014). Other examples of antimicrobial MNPs are incorporated in Table 1.

Iron oxide has long been known for its application in the biomedical sector due to its biocompatibility and magnetic property. However, analysis of antibacterial property of reduced iron (Fe0) and iron oxide nanoparticles (FeO-NPs) is relatively new. The bactericidal effect of FeO-NPs is observed either due to disruption of cell membrane, or oxidative stress inside the cell, or both (Lee et al., 2008; Arokiyaraj et al., 2013) or due to oxidation of protein and peroxidation of membrane lipids (Dinali et al., 2017). Compatibility of ZnO-NPs with human skin and their safety has made them appropriate additive for cosmetics, fabrics, and surfaces that remain in close proximity of human body (Dizaj et al., 2014). Owing to their microbicidal effect on both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, ZnO nanocomposites have been applied in food packing applications (Espitia et al., 2012). The probable mechanisms behind their antimicrobial action are the generation of ROS, the release of Zn ions, and the cell membrane dysfunction (Dizaj et al., 2014). Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) have been exploited for widespread applications, such as gas sensing, batteries, catalysis, etc. In recent past, CuO-NPs were studied for their antimicrobial property and were reported to possess excellent bactericidal and fungicidal activity (Ren et al., 2009). Changes in surface and morphology of microbial cell are supposedly the plausible cause of their biocidal action. TiO2-NPs alone and in conjugation with non-toxic polymers exhibit spectacular antimicrobial property. Due to high refractive index and whiteness property TiO2-NPs (especially anatase form) have been used in a varied range of consumer merchandises, such as sunscreen lotions, paints, cement, coatings, and toothpaste (Weir et al., 2012). They have also been studied for their potential of potable water disinfection as they are inexpensive, significantly stable in water, nontoxic after ingestion, and result in photocatalytic disinfection (Li et al., 2008). The bactericidal effect of TiO2-NPs is strongly related to the formation of ROS, particularly—OH free radicals.

Fullerenes, graphene, and carbon nanotubes

Not many reports exist on the mode of antimicrobial action of fullerenes (C60) and their derivatives thus, it would not be wise to propose their plausible applications. C60 and their certain derivatives have shown strong bactericidal activity; however, no such effect is evident in case of fullerols but they have shown virucidal activity. The antimicrobial effect of C60 and fullerol is attributed to ROS independent oxidation and formation of highly reactive singlet oxygen species, respectively. The ability of encapsulated fullerene to show antimicrobial effects in water (Lyon et al., 2006) can be used to solve waste water problems. Lately, owing to exclusive surface properties, graphene-based materials like oxides, reduced oxides (rGO), and nanocomposites have caught researchers' attention for their ability to act as antimicrobial agent (Zhu et al., 2017; Jilani et al., 2018); however, only limited number of reports are available in this regard. The mechanism behind their microbicidal activity is mostly accredited to “sheet effect” (Ocsoy et al., 2017), cell membrane dysfunction, and oxidative stress inside the cell (Liu et al., 2011). Depending on their ability to prevent microbial contamination, graphene-based materials have potential to be used in food packaging. Like other aforementioned NSMs, single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) have also displayed bactericidal activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, but not much work has been done in this direction. The recognized mode of microbial toxicity behind SWNTs is believed to be either oxidative stress that aborts integrity of cell membrane or their adhesion onto the microbial surface (Dizaj et al., 2014). CNTs have also been used in filters and incorporated into hollow fibers to inhibit bio-fouling of surfaces and formation of biofilms (Li et al., 2008). In addition, they have also been studied for their application as construction material to impart crucial benefits like mechanical durability, crack prevention, biocidal activity, etc. (Lee et al., 2010).

Nanoscale chitosan (NCH)

NCH as an antimicrobial agent has strong potential for potable water disinfection across membranes or water storage tank surface coatings. Owing to its strong, broad-spectrum microbicidal action and innocuous effect on vertebrate animals, NCH has superseded other disinfectants (Beyth et al., 2015). In recent years, NCH has found its application not only in healthcare and consumer merchandises but also in agriculture and biomedical products (bone cement and wound dressing material), food packaging, waste water treatment, etc. (Li et al., 2008). The exact mechanism behind its microbial toxicity is not very clear; however, loss of cell wall integrity and consequent alteration in membrane permeability has been reported by Kong et al. (2008). Also, electrostatic attraction amid polycationic chitosan and anionic bacterial cell membrane in some cases is known to neutralize and eventually reverse the bacterial cell surface charge. Loss of semi-permeability of the membrane has been suggested to cause intracellular components leakage and ultimately cell death (Kong et al., 2010; Wassel and Khattab, 2017).

Organic nanoparticles

Although a wide range of antimicrobial drugs is available which can efficiently kill or hamper microbial growth, however, their ineffective and inefficient delivery to the target may result in the poor therapeutic index and cause several local and systemic side effects. In last few years, antimicrobial drugs encapsulated in ONP systems have appeared as path-breaking and promising alternatives that have not only increased therapeutic index but also reduced detrimental side effects of the drug (Yang et al., 2009; Nath and Banerjee, 2013). Currently, liposome is one of the most commonly used antimicrobial drug delivery system because it can mimic the microbial cell membrane and easily fuse with the pathogenic microbe (Pushparaj Selvadoss et al., 2017). Owing to the unhindered fusion of microbial cell membrane and liposome, cargos (drugs) easily get released inside the microbial cell and eventually result in its death (Walsh et al., 2001; Yang et al., 2009). Polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) have also been extensively studied for their potential to deliver wide variety of antimicrobial agents, as they offer numerous unique features like stable structure, narrow size distribution, zeta potential, ability to finely tune drug release profile, etc. (Cheng et al., 2007; Gu et al., 2008). Like PNPs, dendrimers also possess several exceptional properties, such as large surface area, high in vivo reactivity, and ability to load both polar and non-polar agents, which make them a suitable nano-platform for microbicidal drug delivery (Zhang et al., 2010). Not only this, dendrimer itself can act as a powerful microbicide by using the antimicrobial agent as an elementary unit and the plausible mode of microbial toxicity is accredited to the polycationic structural feature which facilitates its adsorption onto the negatively charged bacterial cell. Once adsorbed, increased membrane permeability is witnessed that ensures entry of more dendrimers inside the cell which later facilitate K+ ions leakage and complete loss of bacterial membrane integrity (Chen and Cooper, 2002; Ladd et al., 2017). The detailed discussion on antimicrobial activity of dendrimers has been described elsewhere (Scorciapino et al., 2017).

Limitations of present work and future prospects of aNSMs

The exact mechanism behind antimicrobial effects of NSMs still remains unclear. Certain reports recognize ROS generation or development of oxidative stress as a cause of microbicidal effect, while others suggest antimicrobial effect cannot be associated with metabolism regulation (Dakal et al., 2016). Therefore, addressing exact mechanism behind the antimicrobial action of NSMs should be considered in future work. Several microbes present complex cell membrane structure, therefore, the in vitro models cannot completely mimic the in vivo conditions to accurately study the effect of aNSMs in duplicate real systems. Other limitations of the current works include lack of unified standards to compare antimicrobial effects of NSMs in order to ensure their potency as antimicrobial agent. Application of NSMs in waste water treatment has raised serious health concerns due to their aggregation in water. Further, loss of nanoparticles during downstream processing may cause toxicity in human beings and affect different ecosystems, therefore future work should be directed toward developing better technologies for retention of nanomaterials. Also, cost effective NSMs should be looked for the disinfection purpose in order to compete with conventional disinfectants.

Conclusions

Owing to their spectacular properties, NSMs in both organic and inorganic forms have engendered several interesting fields in science and technology. Incessant investigation for their application has led to the development of practical productions and commercialization of products in some cases. Considering the current scenario of human health, its comfort, and well-being; NSMs have been welcomed open-heartedly by several industries, such as health and personal care industry, textile industry, environmental industry, etc. However, realizing the application of NSMs at large scale in the economic setup is still a long shot. Therefore, future work should be directed toward designing novel, applicable, and inexpensive methodologies for scaled up manufacturing of these NSMs in order to meet the growing human needs.

Author contributions

AB and PC: wrote the manuscript; AS: helped in writing; PK, PM, and VB: edited the manuscript. All authors proofread and finalized the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by DST Ramanujan Fellowship (SB/S2/RJN-042/2015) awarded to PC by Government of India. AS thanks Dr. U. S. N. Murty, Director NIPER- Guwahati for his support and encouragement.

References

  1. Abdel-Raouf N., Al-Enazi N. M., Ibraheem I. B. (2017). Green biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using Galaxaura elongata and characterization of their antibacterial activity. Arab. J. Chem. 10, S3029–S3039. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.11.044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed S., Ahmad M., Swami B. L., Ikram S. (2016). A review on plants extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications: a green expertise. J. Adv. Res. 7, 17–28. 10.1016/j.jare.2015.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akhavan O., Azimirad R., Safa S., Larijani M. (2010). Visible light photo-induced antibacterial activity of CNT–doped TiO 2 thin films with various CNT contents. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 7386–7392. 10.1039/c0jm00543f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrade F. A. C., De Oliveira Vercik L. C., Monteiro F. J., Da Silva Rigo E. C. (2016). Preparation, characterization and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles–hydroxyapatite composites by a simple and eco-friendly method. Ceram. Int. 42, 2271–2280. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anjum M., Oves M., Kumar R., Barakat M. (2017). Fabrication of ZnO-ZnS@ polyaniline nanohybrid for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol and microbial contaminants in wastewater. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 119, 66–77. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansari S. A., Oves M., Satar R., Khan A., Ahmad S. I., Jafri M. A., et al. (2017). Antibacterial activity of iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation technology against Bacillus cereus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Polish J. Chem. Tech. 19, 110–115. 10.1515/pjct-2017-0076 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Armentano I., Arciola C. R., Fortunati E., Ferrari D., Mattioli S., Amoroso C. F., et al. (2014). The interaction of bacteria with engineered nanostructured polymeric materials: a review. Sci. World J. 2014, 1–18. 10.1155/2014/410423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arokiyaraj S., Saravanan M., Prakash N. U., Arasu M. V., Vijayakumar B., Vincent S. (2013). Enhanced antibacterial activity of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles treated with Argemone mexicana L. leaf extract: an in vitro study. Mat. Res. Bull. 48, 3323–3327. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.05.059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Azam A., Ahmed A. S., Oves M., Khan M. S., Memic A. (2012). Size-dependent antimicrobial properties of CuO nanoparticles against gram-positive and-negative bacterial strains. Int. J. Nanomed. 7, 3527–3535. 10.2147/IJN.S29020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Baranwal A., Mahato K., Srivastava A., Maurya P. K., Chandra P. (2016). Phytofabricated metallic nanoparticles and their clinical applications. RSC Adv. 6, 105996–106010. 10.1039/C6RA23411A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beyth N., Houri-Haddad Y., Domb A., Khan W., Hazan R. (2015). Alternative antimicrobial approach: nano-antimicrobial materials. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2015, 1–16. 10.1155/2015/246012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhushan B. (2010). Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bogdanović U., Lazić V., Vodnik V., Budimir M., Marković Z., Dimitrijević S. (2014). Copper nanoparticles with high antimicrobial activity. Mater. Lett. 128, 75–78. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.106 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Calabretta M. K., Kumar A., McDermott A. M., Cai C. (2007). Antibacterial activities of poly (amidoamine) dendrimers terminated with amino and poly (ethylene glycol) groups. Biomacromolecules 8, 1807–1811. 10.1021/bm0701088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cern A., Connolly K. L., Jerse A. E., Barenholz Y. (2018). In vitro susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains to mupirocin. an antibiotic reformulated to parenteral nano-liposomal antibiotic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1128/AAC.02377-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen C. Z., Cooper S. L. (2002). Interactions between dendrimer biocides and bacterial membranes. Biomaterials 23, 3359–3368. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00036-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cheng J., Teply B. A., Sherifi I., Sung J., Luther G., Gu F. X., et al. (2007). Formulation of functionalized PLGA–PEG nanoparticles for in vivo targeted drug delivery. Biomaterials 28, 869–876. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cui Y., Zhao Y., Tian Y., Zhang W., Lü X., Jiang X. (2012). The molecular mechanism of action of bactericidal gold nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Biomaterials 33, 2327–2333. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dakal T. C., Kumar A., Majumdar R. S., Yadav V. (2016). Mechanistic basis of antimicrobial actions of silver nanoparticles. Front. Microbiol. 7:1831. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Das M. R., Sarma R. K., Borah S. C., Kumari R., Saikia R., Deshmukh A. B., et al. (2013). The synthesis of citrate-modified silver nanoparticles in an aqueous suspension of graphene oxide nanosheets and their antibacterial activity. ?Colloids Surf. B 105, 128–136. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.12.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dastjerdi R., Mojtahedi M., Shoshtari A., Khosroshahi A. (2010). Investigating the production and properties of Ag/TiO2/PP antibacterial nanocomposite filament yarns. J. Text. Inst. 101, 204–213. 10.1080/00405000802346388 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dastjerdi R., Montazer M. (2010). A review on the application of inorganic nano-structured materials in the modification of textiles: focus on anti-microbial properties. Colloids Surf. B 79, 5–18. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Desselberger U. (2000). Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. J. Infect. 40, 3–15. 10.1053/jinf.1999.0624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dinali R., Ebrahiminezhad A., Manley-Harris M., Ghasemi Y., Berenjian A. (2017). Iron oxide nanoparticles in modern microbiology and biotechnology. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 43, 493–507. 10.1080/1040841X.2016.1267708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dizaj S. M., Lotfipour F., Barzegar-Jalali M., Zarrintan M. H., Adibkia K. (2014). Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 44, 278–284. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Duncan T. V. (2011). Applications of nanotechnology in food packaging and food safety: barrier materials, antimicrobials and sensors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 363, 1–24. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. El-Nahhal I. M., Elmanamah A. A., El Ashgar N. M., Amara N., Selmane M., Chehimi M. M. (2017). Stabilization of nano-structured ZnO particles onto the surface of cotton fibers using different surfactants and their antimicrobial activity. Ultrason. Sonochem. 38, 478–487. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.03.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Espitia P. J. P., Soares N. D. F. F., Dos Reis Coimbra J. S., De Andrade N. J., Cruz R. S., Medeiros E. A. A. (2012). Zinc oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antimicrobial activity and food packaging applications. Food Bioprocess Tech. 5, 1447–1464. 10.1007/s11947-012-0797-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gao W., Vecchio D., Li J., Zhu J., Zhang Q., Fu V., et al. (2014). Hydrogel containing nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes for topical antimicrobial delivery. ACS Nano 8, 2900–2907. 10.1021/nn500110a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ghosh S., Patil S., Ahire M., Kitture R., Kale S., Pardesi K., et al. (2012). Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Dioscorea bulbifera tuber extract and evaluation of its synergistic potential in combination with antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Nanomed. 7, 483–496. 10.2147/IJN.S24793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Grande C. D., Mangadlao J., Fan J., De Leon A., Delgado-Ospina J., Rojas J. G., et al. (2017). Chitosan cross-linked graphene oxide nanocomposite films with antimicrobial activity for application in food industry, in Macromolecular Symposia (Weinheim: Wiley Online Library; ). [Google Scholar]
  32. Gu F., Zhang L., Teply B. A., Mann N., Wang A., Radovic-Moreno A. F., et al. (2008). Precise engineering of targeted nanoparticles by using self-assembled biointegrated block copolymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2586–2591. 10.1073/pnas.0711714105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gunalan S., Sivaraj R., Rajendran V. (2012). Green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 22, 693–700. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2012.11.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Habiba K., Bracho-Rincon D. P., Gonzalez-Feliciano J. A., Villalobos-Santos J. C., Makarov V. I., Ortiz D., et al. (2015). Synergistic antibacterial activity of PEGylated silver–graphene quantum dots nanocomposites. Appl. Mater. Today 1, 80–87. 10.1016/j.apmt.2015.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Haghighi N., Abdi Y., Haghighi F. (2011). Light-induced antifungal activity of TiO 2 nanoparticles/ZnO nanowires. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 10096–10100. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.145 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang Z., Zheng X., Yan D., Yin G., Liao X., Kang Y., et al. (2008). Toxicological effect of ZnO nanoparticles based on bacteria. Langmuir 24, 4140–4144. 10.1021/la7035949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jayaseelan C., Ramkumar R., Rahuman A. A., Perumal P. (2013). Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using seed aqueous extract of Abelmoschus esculentus and its antifungal activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 45, 423–429. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jilani A., Othman M. H. D., Ansari M. O., Oves M., Alshahrie A., Khan I. U., et al. (2018). A simple route to layer-by-layer assembled few layered graphene oxide nanosheets: optical, dielectric and antibacterial aspects. J. Mol. Liq. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Jin T., Sun D., Su J. Y., Zhang H., Sue H. J. (2009). Antimicrobial efficacy of zinc oxide quantum dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157: H7. J. Food Sci. 74, 46–52. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.01013.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kang S., Pinault M., Pfefferle L. D., Elimelech M. (2007). Single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit strong antimicrobial activity. Langmuir 23, 8670–8673. 10.1021/la701067r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Khan A. A., Khan A., Rahman M. M., Asiri A. M., Oves M. (2017). Sensor development of 1, 2 dichlorobenzene based on polypyrole/Cu-doped ZnO (PPY/CZO) nanocomposite embedded silver electrode and their antimicrobial studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 98, 256–267. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Khatoon U. T., Rao G. N., Mohan K. M., Ramanaviciene A., Ramanavicius A. (2017). Antibacterial and antifungal activity of silver nanospheres synthesized by tri-sodium citrate assisted chemical approach. Vacuum 146, 259–265. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.10.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Khot L. R., Sankaran S., Maja J. M., Ehsani R., Schuster E. W. (2012). Applications of nanomaterials in agricultural production and crop protection: a review. Crop Prot. 35, 64–70. 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Kong M., Chen X. G., Liu C. S., Liu C. G., Meng X. H., Yu L. J. (2008). Antibacterial mechanism of chitosan microspheres in a solid dispersing system against E. coli. Colloids Surf. B 65, 197–202. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kong M., Chen X. G., Xing K., Park H. J. (2010). Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 144, 51–63. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kumar R., Oves M., Almeelbi T., Al-Makishah N. H., Barakat M. (2017). Hybrid chitosan/polyaniline-polypyrrole biomaterial for enhanced adsorption and antimicrobial activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 490, 488–496. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ladd E., Sheikhi A., Li N., van de Ven T. G., Kakkar A. (2017). Design and synthesis of dendrimers with facile surface group functionalization, and an evaluation of their bactericidal efficacy. Molecules 22:868 10.3390/molecules22060868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lala N. L., Ramaseshan R., Bojun L., Sundarrajan S., Barhate R. S., Ying-Jun L., et al. (2007). Fabrication of nanofibers with antimicrobial functionality used as filters: protection against bacterial contaminants. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97, 1357–1365. 10.1002/bit.21351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Latif U., Al-Rubeaan K., Saeb A. T. (2015). A review on antimicrobial chitosan-silver nanocomposites: a roadmap toward pathogen targeted synthesis. Int. J. Polymeric Mater. Polymeric Biomater. 64, 448–458. 10.1080/00914037.2014.958834 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee C., Kim J. Y., Lee W. I., Nelson K. L., Yoon J., Sedlak D. L. (2008). Bactericidal effect of zero-valent iron nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 4927–4933. 10.1021/es800408u [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee J., Mahendra S., Alvarez P. J. (2010). Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. ACS Nano 4, 3580–3590. 10.1021/nn100866w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li C., Wang X., Chen F., Zhang C., Zhi X., Wang K., et al. (2013). The antifungal activity of graphene oxide–silver nanocomposites. Biomaterials 34, 3882–3890. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li Q., Mahendra S., Lyon D. Y., Brunet L., Liga M. V., Li D., et al. (2008). Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. Water Res. 42, 4591–4602. 10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Li S. M., Jia N., Ma M. G., Zhang Z., Liu Q. H., Sun R. C. (2011). Cellulose–silver nanocomposites: microwave-assisted synthesis, characterization, their thermal stability, and antimicrobial property. Carbohydr. Polym. 86, 441–447. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu S., Wei L., Hao L., Fang N., Chang M. W., Xu R., et al. (2009). Sharper and faster “nano darts” kill more bacteria: a study of antibacterial activity of individually dispersed pristine single-walled carbon nanotube. ACS Nano 3, 3891–3902. 10.1021/nn901252r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu S., Zeng T. H., Hofmann M., Burcombe E., Wei J., Jiang R., et al. (2011). Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 5, 6971–6980. 10.1021/nn202451x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lyon D. Y., Adams L. K., Falkner J. C., Alvarezt P. J. (2006). Antibacterial activity of fullerene water suspensions: effects of preparation method and particle size. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4360–4366. 10.1021/es0603655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Morse S. S. (2001). Factors in the emergence of infectious diseases, in Plagues and Politics, ed Price-Smith A. T. (London: Palgrave Macmillan; ), 8–26. [Google Scholar]
  59. Murphy F. A. (1994). New, emerging, and reemerging infectious diseases. Adv. Virus Res. 43, 1–52. 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60046-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nath D., Banerjee P. (2013). Green nanotechnology–a new hope for medical biology. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 36, 997–1014. 10.1016/j.etap.2013.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ocsoy I., Temiz M., Celik C., Altinsoy B., Yilmaz V., Duman F. (2017). A green approach for formation of silver nanoparticles on magnetic graphene oxide and highly effective antimicrobial activity and reusability. J. Mol. Liq. 227, 147–152. 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Oves M., Arshad M., Khan M. S., Ahmed A. S., Azam A., Ismail I. M. (2015). Anti-microbial activity of cobalt doped zinc oxide nanoparticles: targeting water borne bacteria. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 19, 581–588. 10.1016/j.jscs.2015.05.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Oves M., Qari H. A., Felemban N. M., Khan M. Z., Rehan Z. A., Ismail I. M. (2016). Marinobacter lipolyticus from Red Sea for lipase production and modulation of silver nanomaterials for anti-candidal activities. IET Nanobiotechnol. 11, 403–410. 10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pushparaj Selvadoss P., Nellore J., Balaraman Ravindrran M., Sekar U., Tippabathani J. (2017). Enhancement of antimicrobial activity by liposomal oleic acid-loaded antibiotics for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 46, 268–273. 10.1080/21691401.2017.1307209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Qayyum S., Oves M., Khan A. U. (2017). Obliteration of bacterial growth and biofilm through ROS generation by facilely synthesized green silver nanoparticles. PLoS ONE 12:e0181363. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rai A., Prabhune A., Perry C. C. (2010). Antibiotic mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles with potent antimicrobial activity and their application in antimicrobial coatings. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 6789–6798. 10.1039/c0jm00817f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ren G., Hu D., Cheng E. W., Vargas-Reus M. A., Reip P., Allaker R. P. (2009). Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 33, 587–590. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ristic B. Z., Milenkovic M. M., Dakic I. R., Todorovic-Markovic B. M., Milosavljevic M. S., Budimir M. D., et al. (2014). Photodynamic antibacterial effect of graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials 35, 4428–4435. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Scorciapino M. A., Serra I., Manzo G., Rinaldi A. C. (2017). Antimicrobial dendrimeric peptides: structure, activity and new therapeutic applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18:542. 10.3390/ijms18030542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Singh V., Sandeep K., Kushwaha H., Powar S., Vaish R. (2018). Photocatalytic, hydrophobic and antimicrobial characteristics of ZnO nano needle embedded cement composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 158, 285–294. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Usman M. S., El Zowalaty M. E., Shameli K., Zainuddin N., Salama M., Ibrahim N. A. (2013). Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial properties of copper nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 8, 4467–4479. 10.2147/IJN.S50837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Walsh T. J., Goodman J. L., Pappas P., Bekersky I., Buell D. N., Roden M., et al. (2001). Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of high-dose liposomal amphotericin b (AmBisome) in patients infected with Aspergillus species and other filamentous fungi: maximum tolerated dose study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 3487–3496. 10.1128/AAC.45.12.3487-3496.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wassel M. O., Khattab M. A. (2017). Antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and inhibition of bacterial induced enamel demineralization of propolis, miswak, and chitosan nanoparticles based dental varnishes. J. Adv. Res. 8, 387–392. 10.1016/j.jare.2017.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Weir A., Westerhoff P., Fabricius L., Hristovski K., von Goetz N. (2012). Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 2242–2250. 10.1021/es204168d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wijnhoven S., Oomen A., Sips A., Bourgeois F., Te Dorsthorst G., Kooi M., et al. (2010). Development of an inventory for consumer products containing nanomaterials. Available onlin at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/nanotech/pdf/study_inventory.pdf
  76. Yang D., Pornpattananangkul D., Nakatsuji T., Chan M., Carson D., Huang C. M., et al. (2009). The antimicrobial activity of liposomal lauric acids against Propionibacterium acnes. Biomaterials 30, 6035–6040. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhang L., Pornpattananangku D., Hu C. M., Huang C. M. (2010). Development of nanoparticles for antimicrobial drug delivery. Curr. Med. Chem. 17, 585–594. 10.2174/092986710790416290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhang Y., Peng H., Huang W., Zhou Y., Yan D. (2008). Facile preparation and characterization of highly antimicrobial colloid Ag or Au nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 325, 371–376. 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.05.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Zheng K., Setyawati M. I., Leong D. T., Xie J. (2017). Antimicrobial gold nanoclusters. ACS Nano 11, 6904–6910. 10.1021/acsnano.7b02035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhu J., Wang J., Hou J., Zhang Y., Liu J., Van Der Bruggen B. (2017). Graphene-based antimicrobial polymeric membranes: a review. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 6776–6793. 10.1039/C7TA00009J [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES