Abstract
Purpose
Ocular trauma is one of the most common causes of acquired blindness in children. It measures about 8%-14% of total childhood injuries. This study aims to determine the epidemiological profile of ocular trauma in the pediatric age group attending a tertiary hospital in northern India.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted in our hospital between June 2014 to July 2015 and all the children aged 0-16 years presenting with ocular trauma in eye outpatient department and emergency were enrolled in the study. Various epidemiological parameters like age, sex distribution, duration of presentation, mode of injury, type of injury and final visual outcome were analyzed.
Results
Of total 357 patients, 271 (76%) were below the age of 12 years; 41.1% of children with ocular trauma belonged to age group 2-6 years. The male to female ratio was 2.9:1. Out of total patients, 242 (67.8%) presented with closed globe injury. Among the closed globe injury, the history of fall was present in about 35% of children, followed by trauma while playing with bat/ball (15.7%) and finger nail trauma (13.2%). Among open globe injury, trauma with needle, knife, glass and pen were common causes. Home was the most common place of injury (47.8%), followed by streets (17.9%) and playground (14.9%).
Conclusion
Children are vulnerable to ocular trauma and need more supervision. Sharp objects like needles, knives, household chemicals like acids should be out of reach of children.
Keywords: Ocular trauma, Open globe injuries, Closed globe injuries, Birmingham eye trauma terminology system, Adnexal injuries, Pediatric ocular trauma
Introduction
Ocular trauma is one of the most common causes of acquired blindness in children.1 There are about 1.6 million people blind due to eye injuries; in addition to this, 2.3 million are having low vision bilaterally and 19 million represent unilateral visual loss, making eye trauma the most common etiology of unilateral blindness.2, 3 Eye injuries measure about 8%–14% of the total childhood injuries.4 Ocular trauma is one of the leading cause of treatable visual morbidity and blindness5 with children at a greater risk due to careless activities and inability in understanding the nature of dangerous objects.6 Ocular trauma is associated with a great amount of emotional stress as well as frequent hospital visits and increasing economic burden.7, 8 Ninety percent of eye trauma is preventable by taking care of minor things.9
The epidemiological parameter of childhood ocular trauma varies from region to region, and also varies with demographic data like age and sex. In a study conducted in US, about 25.4% of ocular injuries occurred in children and young adults up to 18 years.8 While in a study conducted in Pakistan, the mean age of children present with ocular trauma was 7.03 ± 3.61 years, out of which 42.9% were school-going (6–11 years old).10 In Israel, about half (47%) of the eye injuries occurred in children younger than 17 years, mainly between 6 and 12 years of age.11
A large number of studies on ocular trauma have been conducted in developed countries12, 13, 14 but the pattern of eye injuries in developing countries is not well known.15 This study was conducted in the department of ophthalmology in a tertiary hospital institute of northern India. This study will help in estimating the burden of the childhood preventable blindness in this region and also identify the contributing factors responsible.
Methods
This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital of northern India. All patients with ocular trauma aged between 0 and 16 years presenting to the hospital from June 2014 to July 2015 were included in our study and evaluated for epidemiological parameters like mode of injury, age, sex distribution and type of injury. After complete examination including visual acuity at presentation, anterior segment findings, fundus examination, management given either in the form of medical or surgical intervention was noted. Visual acuity was measured using Snellen's chart or Illiterate E-chart for school-going children and using pictures or matching letters for young children. The subsequent follow-up findings were noted at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months; and final best corrected visual acuity was taken at the end of 3 months. Data were reviewed using appropriate statistical tests and outcome was compared with previous studies for discussion.
Ocular injuries were classified as per World Health Organization (WHO) and Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS).16, 17 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System classification of ocular injuries.
Adnexal injuries were not included in BETTS classification. A new classification of ocular trauma was proposed in 2009 where the authors suggested that the term “ocular trauma” include structures of ocular adnexa such as the lids, orbit, lacrimal apparatus, and the conjunctival, not just the eyeball or globe.16
Results
This study included in total 357 patients presenting to the emergency and eye outpatient department with ocular trauma. Out of them, 267 (74.8%) were males and 90 (25.2%) were females. The male to female ratio was 2.9:1 (Table 1). The majority of children with ocular trauma were present in age group 2–6 years (41.2%).
Table 1.
Age and sex distribution of pediatric ocular trauma.
Age group (Year) | Male | Female | Total (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0–1 | 3 | 0 | 3 (0.84) |
2–6 | 105 | 42 | 147 (41.18) |
7–12 | 90 | 31 | 121 (33.89) |
13–16 | 69 | 17 | 86 (24.09) |
Total (%) | 267 (74.79) | 90 (25.21) | 357 (100) |
Out of the 357 patients, 242 (67.8%) presented with closed globe injury and 115 (32.2%) with open globe injury. Among closed globe injury, adnexal injury was commonest, followed by sub conjunctival hemorrhage and then corneal abrasion. Among open globe injury, corneal perforation with or without uveal tissue prolapse was the commonest followed by traumatic cataract (Table 2). The final visual acuity, at the end of 3rd month, was improved in a large portion of patients but 12.3% of patients ended up with mono ocular blindness (Table 2).
Table 2.
Type of injury and final visual outcome (at the end of 3rd month).
Type of injury | Final visual outcome |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-cooperative/Not documented | <3/60-pl | <6/18–3/60 | 6/18–6/6 | Total (%) | |
Closed globe injury (n = 242) | |||||
Adnexal | 34 | – | – | 57 | 91 (25.5) |
Sub conjunctival hemorrhage | 2 | – | – | 87 | 89 (24.9) |
Corneal abrasion | 9 | – | – | 53 | 62 (17.3) |
Open globe injury (n = 115) | |||||
Corneal perforation with/without uveal tissue prolapse | 10 | 27 | 29 | – | 66 (18.5) |
Traumatic cataract | 04 | 13 | 19 | 05 | 41 (11.5) |
Intraocular foreign body | – | 4 | – | 4 | 8 (2.3) |
Total (%) | 59 (18.5) | 44 (12.3) | 48 (13.4) | 206 (57.7) | 357 (100) |
Among the closed globe injury, the history of fall was present in about 35% of children, followed by trauma while playing with bat/ball (15.7%) and followed by finger nail trauma (13.2%). Among open globe injury, trauma with needle, knife, glass and pen were common causes (Fig. 2). Home was the most common place of injury (47.8%), followed by streets (17.9%) and playground (14.9%) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2.
Pie Chart showing mode of injury among closed and open globe injuries.
Fig. 3.
Pie chart showing distribution of ocular injuries according to the place of occurrence.
Discussion
Ocular injury is very common, more so in the under privileged and developing countries. Ocular trauma constitutes 5% of all cases admitted in developed countries and about 12.9% in developing under privileged and developing countries.18 In our study, it was found that the most common age group involved was 2–6 years as supported by other studies.19 The prevalence of childhood ocular trauma being lower in age group <2 years has been explained by greater parental care and children being less exposed to outer world.20 Male to female ratio in terms of ocular trauma in our study was found to be 2.9:1. Various studies also showed higher incidence of eye injuries in males.4, 6, 21 The commonest location for ocular trauma was home, which is consistent with various studies.4, 21, 22 The commonest etiological agents causing open globe injuries included needle, knife, glass and arrow in our study which correlate with previous studies.20 Forty-four patients (12.3%) had mono ocular blindness at the end of our study while 57.7% attained good visual outcome. In a study conducted by Narang et al23, ambulatory vision was attained in 52.8% of children.
Thus at the end of the study it was concluded that children need more supervision at home and family should be made aware of the modes of eye injuries, using safety measures like goggles and helmets while driving, and supervising the objects to be played with. Sharp objects like needles, knives, household chemicals like acids should be out of reach of children. In case of mishap, it is mandatory to seek medical attention at the earliest.
Footnotes
Peer review under responsibility of Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University.
References
- 1.Kaur A., Agrawal A. Paediatric ocular trauma. Curr Sci. 2005;89:43–46. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Parver L.M. Eye trauma. The neglected disorder. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(10):1452–1453. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050220046022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Négrel A.D., Thylefors B. The global impact of eye injuries. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1998;5(3):143–169. doi: 10.1076/opep.5.3.143.8364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brophy M., Sinclair S.A., Hostetler S.G. Pediatric eye injury-related hospitalizations in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):e1263–e1271. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Omolase C.O., Omolade E.O., Ogunleye O.T. Pattern of ocular injuries in owo, Nigeria. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2011;6(2):114–118. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shoja M.R., Miratashi A.M. Paediatric ocular trauma. Acta Med Iran. 2006;44:125–130. [Google Scholar]
- 7.McGwin G., Jr., Owsley C. Incidence of emergency department-treated eye injury in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(5):662–666. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.5.662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McGwin G., Jr., Xie A., Owsley C. Rate of eye injury in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):970–976. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.7.970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nelson L.B., Wilson T.W., Jeffers J.B. Eye injuries in childhood: demography, etiology, and prevention. Pediatrics. 1989;84(3):438–441. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Noorani S., Ahmed J., Shaikh A. Frequency of different types of pediatric ocular trauma attending a tertiary care pediatric ophthalmology department. Pak J Med Sci. 2010;26:567–570. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rapoport I., Romem M., Kinek M. Eye injuries in children in Israel. A nationwide collaborative study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108(3):376–379. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070050074034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mela E.K., Dvorak G.J., Mantzouranis G.A. Ocular trauma in a Greek population: review of 899 cases resulting in hospitalization. Ophthal Epidemiol. 2005;12(3):185–190. doi: 10.1080/09286580590964801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tomazzoli L., Renzi G., Mansoldo C. Eye injuries in childhood: a retrospective investigation of 88 cases from 1988 to 2000. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13(8):710–713. doi: 10.1177/112067210301300808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Loon S.C., Tay W.T., Saw S.M. Prevalence and risk factors of ocular trauma in an urban south-east Asian population: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(4):362–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02035.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nordberg E. Injuries as a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa: epidemiology and prospects for control. East Afr Med J. 2000;77(12 Suppl):S1–S43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kuhn F., Morris R., Witherspoon C.D. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):240–243. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30710-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kuhn F., Morris R., Witherspoon C.D. The Birmingham eye trauma Terminology system (BETT) J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004;27(2):206–210. doi: 10.1016/s0181-5512(04)96122-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thylefors B. Epidemiological patterns of ocular trauma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1992;20(2):95–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1992.tb00718.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Khan M.D., Kundi N., Mohammed Z. A 6 1/2-years survey of intraocular and intraorbital foreign bodies in the North-west Frontier Province, Pakistan. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71(9):716–719. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.9.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Saxena R., Sinha R., Purohit A. Pattern of pediatric ocular trauma in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69(10):863–867. doi: 10.1007/BF02723708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aghadoost D., Fazel M.R., Aghadoost H.R. Pattern of pediatric ocular trauma in Kashan. Arch Trauma Res. 2012;1(1):35–37. doi: 10.5812/atr.5302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hosseini H., Masoumpour M., Keshavarz-Fazl F. Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of severe childhood ocular injuries in southern Iran. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2011;18(2):136–140. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.80702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Narang S., Gupta V., Simalandhi P. Paediatric open globe injuries. Visual outcome and risk factors for endophthalmitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004;52(1):29–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]