Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1978 May;278:533–557. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012323

Reactivation of membrane charge movement and delayed potassium conductance in skeletal muscle fibres.

R H Adrian, R F Rakowski
PMCID: PMC1282367  PMID: 307598

Abstract

1. Intramembrane charge movement has been measured in striated muscle subjected to prolonged depolarization but repolarized to -100 mV for up to 100 sec. The method of measurement allows identification of charge or charges which are 'reprimed' by repolarization. 2. Charge 'reprimed' by repolarization appears to differ in its voltage distribution from charge detected in a permanently polarized fibre. The difference is probably due to the different pulse sequences used in the two measurements and to the fact that there appear to be several species of intramembrane charges with different transition potentials and different steepness of voltage distribution (V and k in eqn. (14): see below). 3. Potassium conductance is reprimed by repolarization following inactivation by depolarization. When the repriming potential is -100 mV the process appears to be in two stages; repriming to a value rather less than half the final value takes place exponentially with a time constant of approximately 40 sec; subsequently repriming to the final value is very slow. At a repriming potential of -140 mV repriming to the final value )1--2 mmho/microF) takes place exponentially with a time constant of approximately 17 sec.

Full text

PDF
533

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Almers W. Charge movement in the membrane of striated muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):339–360. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Almers W. Membrane capacity measurements on frog skeletal muscle in media of low ion content. J Physiol. 1974 Mar;237(3):573–605. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Almers W. The voltage dependence of membrane capacity. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):317–338. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Slow changes in potassium permeability in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):645–668. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Voltage clamp experiments in striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):607–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Rakowski R. F. Charge movement and mechanical repriming in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):361–388. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Adrian R. H., Peres A. R. A gating signal for the potassium channel? Nature. 1977 Jun 30;267(5614):800–804. doi: 10.1038/267800a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Almers W., Best P. M. Effects of tetracaine on displacement currents and contraction of frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(3):583–611. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Almers W. Differential effects of tetracaine on delayed potassium channels and displacement currents in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(3):613–637. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Almers W. Some dielectric properties of muscle membrane and their possible importance for excitation-contraction coupling. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Dec 30;264:278–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb31489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Armstrong C. M., Bezanilla F. Charge movement associated with the opening and closing of the activation gates of the Na channels. J Gen Physiol. 1974 May;63(5):533–552. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.5.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandler W. K., Rakowski R. F., Schneider M. F. A non-linear voltage dependent charge movement in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):245–283. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chandler W. K., Rakowski R. F., Schneider M. F. Effects of glycerol treatment and maintained depolarization on charge movement in skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(2):285–316. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. Potassium contractures in single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:386–403. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500–544. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. The effect of diameter on the electrical constants of frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):105–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keynes R. D., Rojas E. Kinetics and steady-state properties of the charged system controlling sodium conductance in the squid giant axon. J Physiol. 1974 Jun;239(2):393–434. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schneider M. F., Chandler W. K. Effects of membrane potential on the capacitance of skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Feb;67(2):125–163. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.2.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schneider M. F., Chandler W. K. Voltage dependent charge movement of skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 1973 Mar 23;242(5395):244–246. doi: 10.1038/242244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES