Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 2019 May;180(1):3–4. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00260

Salicylic Acid, Senescence, and Heterosis

Lisa M Smith 1,1,2
PMCID: PMC6501103  PMID: 31053670

For a number of crops, agricultural yields have been boosted by the phenomenon of heterosis or hybrid vigor, where a hybrid outperforms either parent. Understanding the various mechanisms by which heterosis arises may facilitate the breeding of hybrids with increased vigor for further crop varieties or species. Vigor can be determined by measurement of a number of traits from seed yield and plant biomass through to biotic and abiotic stress resistance. Tradeoffs may exist between some of these traits such that breeding for one may negatively affect another desirable phenotype (e.g. defense versus growth; Albrecht and Argueso, 2017). A number of plant hormones act in regulating plant growth and defense with both synergistic and antagonistic effects. Maize (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza sativa) are two key crops for which heterosis has increased yields. In rice, altered regulation of gibberellic acid and abscisic acid biosynthesis genes can lead to hybrid vigor (Chen et al., 2018), whereas factors that contribute to heterosis in maize include the masking of recessive deleterious mutations (Yang et al., 2017) and changes in the epigenetic landscape associated with subsequent gene expression (Seifert et al., 2018).

As for many biological processes, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has been used as a model in the study of hybrid vigor, with a number of pathways and genes that contribute to heterosis identified over the past decade. For Ler × C24 hybrids of Arabidopsis, auxin signaling and transport pathways, as well as epigenetic regulation of genes, have been identified as mechanisms of heterosis (Groszmann et al., 2011; Shen et al., 2012). These studies confirm the potential for hormone signaling and epigenetic regulation of gene expression to contribute to hybrid vigor. For C24 × Col-0 hybrids, heterosis in rosette growth is linked to upregulation of photosynthesis genes and downregulation of stress response genes that are coregulated by the circadian clock (Miller et al., 2015). Although far from comprehensive, these previous studies demonstrate the complexity of heterosis, which has different causes between hybrids and species and multiple factors contributing to heterosis within a single hybrid. In contrast to the varied mechanisms of heterosis, the opposite phenomenon of hybrid incompatibility or hybrid weakness is frequently based on upregulation of defense response genes (Chae et al., 2014).

In this issue of Plant Physiology, Ian Greaves’ group at CSIRO Agriculture and Food in Canberra further explored the basis of heterosis in C24 × Ler hybrids of Arabidopsis (Gonzalez-Bayon et al., 2019). This study builds on their previous body of work showing that hormone pathway and biotic response genes are differently expressed in hybrids of C24 × Ler, C24 × Col-0, and Col-0 × Ler (Groszmann et al., 2015). The group has previously shown that a reduction in the defense hormone salicylic acid leads to increased vigor in C24 plants, whereas decreased salicylic acid and auxin responses are present in C24 × Ler and C24 ± Col-0 hybrids (Groszmann et al., 2015). Based on these results, the authors hypothesized that hybrid vigor can in some instances be the reverse of hybrid incompatibility, i.e. that downregulation of defense response genes in a hybrid may lead to heterosis.

It is important to note that C24 is physiologically an outlier compared to other Arabidopsis accessions (Ferguson et al., 2018). With reduced stomatal conductance, possibly linked to the higher salicylic acid levels, C24 is drought-, heat-, and ozone-tolerant, but more sensitive to some other forms of abiotic stress (Bechtold et al., 2010, 2018; Brosché et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2015). C24 has been known for almost a decade to have constitutively high salicylic acid levels with small rosettes but normal levels of seed yield when not stressed (Bechtold et al., 2010). Thus, the use of rosette biomass as an indicator of overall fitness does not apply to C24.

In this article, the authors have explored further the role of salicylic acid in C24 and C24 × Ler hybrids. The authors confirmed their previous finding that decreasing salicylic acid levels in C24, through the introduction of a bacterial NahG gene that converts the hormone into inactive catechol, leads to an increase in plant size after 21 d of growth. Whether a further reduction in salicylic acid levels in the C24 × Ler hybrid would also lead to an increase in growth has not been not tested, although the fresh weight of mature C24 NahG rosettes was equivalent to that of the C24 × Ler F1 plants. However, the hybrids were larger than either parent or the C24 NahG plants early in growth, indicating that there is an additional heterosis mechanism other than salicylic acid active during seedling establishment.

Through a detailed transcriptome comparison of C24 NahG, Ler NahG, and F1 C24 × Ler plants to the midparental value, Gonzalez-Bayon et al. (2019) found that the majority of differentially expressed genes were downregulated, rather than upregulated, and therefore focused on this subset of 771 repressed genes. Unsurprisingly, genes within the salicylic acid biosynthesis pathway were downregulated in the C24 NahG and hybrid lines, consistent with salicylic acid levels being lower than the C24 value in these lines. In the Ler NahG line, where salicylic acid levels were not significantly reduced beyond the already low levels of the hormone in the Ler wild type, various salicylic acid-responsive defense genes were also downregulated, but to a lesser extent. In the C24 NahG and hybrid lines, lower gene expression was largely due to a reduction in expression of C24-derived genes rather than the Ler genes.

That downregulation of defense responses may facilitate increased plant growth as a trade-off between growth and defense generally is accepted in plant biology (Karasov et al., 2017), although this connection is not absolute (see Campos et al., 2016). One important salicylic acid-inducible regulatory gene that has been linked to the balance between growth and defense is TL1 BINDING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR1 (Pajerowska-Mukhtar et al., 2012), a gene whose transcript levels were significantly reduced in the F1 hybrids and C24 NahG plants. Likewise, genes connected to salicylic-acid–induced senescence were downregulated in these lines, which Gonzalez-Bayon et al. (2019) linked to a brief delay in senescence providing leaves with a longer period of maximum photosynthetic potential.

Previously, the Greaves group has reported that increased plant size in C24 × Ler F1 hybrids and C24 NahG plants is partially due to increase in cell size (Groszmann et al., 2015). In this article, they expand on this interesting result, showing that a handful of genes associated with increased cell size (encoding expansins and xyloglucan-modifying proteins) were upregulated in these lines, whereas extensins that limit cell size were downregulated. Whether these genes act downstream of salicylic acid remains to be explored.

In summary, downregulation of salicylic acid levels can increase growth in an accession with unusually high salicylic acid levels. In comparison, a hybrid from this accession that exhibits heterosis also showed downregulation of salicylic acid-regulated defense genes. Both genotypes exhibit delayed senescence, allowing leaves to contribute more to growth through a prolonged period of maximum photosynthetic capacity. However, as evidenced by (1) the small size of the Ler parental line despite its low levels of salicylic acid, and (2) previous literature, hormone levels are only one part of the jigsaw puzzle in plant growth and heterosis.

The wider impact of the research presented by Gonzalez-Bayon et al. (2019) is that selection for downregulation of the salicylic-acid pathway in inbred accessions may prove to be a viable strategy to increase plant size and hence crop yields. Whether this approach is also useful for hybrids will require further investigation and may only be effective in cases where one parent has uncommonly high salicylic acid levels to begin with.

References

  1. Albrecht T, Argueso CT (2017) Should I fight or should I grow now? The role of cytokinins in plant growth and immunity and in the growth-defence trade-off. Ann Bot 119: 725–735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bechtold U, Lawson T, Mejia-Carranza J, Meyer RC, Brown IR, Altmann T, Ton J, Mullineaux PM (2010) Constitutive salicylic acid defences do not compromise seed yield, drought tolerance and water productivity in the Arabidopsis accession C24. Plant Cell Environ 33: 1959–1973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bechtold U, Ferguson JN, Mullineaux PM (2018) To defend or to grow: Lessons from Arabidopsis C24. J Exp Bot 69: 2809–2821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brosché M, Merilo E, Mayer F, Pechter P, Puzõrjova I, Brader G, Kangasjärvi J, Kollist H (2010) Natural variation in ozone sensitivity among Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and its relation to stomatal conductance. Plant Cell Environ 33: 914–925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campos ML, Yoshida Y, Major IT, de Oliveira Ferreira D, Weraduwage SM, Froehlich JE, Johnson BF, Kramer DM, Jander G, Sharkey TD, et al. (2016) Rewiring of jasmonate and phytochrome B signalling uncouples plant growth-defense tradeoffs. Nat Commun 7: 12570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chae E, Bomblies K, Kim ST, Karelina D, Zaidem M, Ossowski S, Martín-Pizarro C, Laitinen RA, Rowan BA, Tenenboim H, et al. (2014) Species-wide genetic incompatibility analysis identifies immune genes as hot spots of deleterious epistasis. Cell 159: 1341–1351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen L, Bian J, Shi S, Yu J, Khanzada H, Wassan GM, Zhu C, Luo X, Tong S, Yang X, et al. (2018) Genetic analysis for the grain number heterosis of a super-hybrid rice WFYT025 combination using RNA-Seq. Rice (NY) 11: 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferguson JN, Humphry M, Lawson T, Brendel O, Bechtold U (2018) Natural variation of life‐history traits, water use, and drought responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Direct 2: e00035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gonzalez-Bayon R, Shen Y, Groszmann M, Zhu A, Wang A, Allu AD, Dennis LS, Peacock WJ, Greaves IK (2019) Senescence and defense pathways contribute to heterosis. Plant Physiol 180: 240–252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Groszmann M, Greaves IK, Albertyn ZI, Scofield GN, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2011) Changes in 24-nt siRNA levels in Arabidopsis hybrids suggest an epigenetic contribution to hybrid vigor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 2617–2622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Groszmann M, Gonzalez-Bayon R, Lyons RL, Greaves IK, Kazan K, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (2015) Hormone-regulated defense and stress response networks contribute to heterosis in Arabidopsis F1 hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112: E6397–E6406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karasov TL, Chae E, Herman JJ, Bergelson J (2017) Mechanisms to mitigate the trade-off between growth and defense. Plant Cell 29: 666–680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller M, Song Q, Shi X, Juenger TE, Chen ZJ (2015) Natural variation in timing of stress-responsive gene expression predicts heterosis in intraspecific hybrids of Arabidopsis. Nat Commun 6: 7453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pajerowska-Mukhtar KM, Wang W, Tada Y, Oka N, Tucker CL, Fonseca JP, Dong X (2012) The HSF-like transcription factor TBF1 is a major molecular switch for plant growth-to-defense transition. Curr Biol 22: 103–112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Seifert F, Thiemann A, Grant-Downton R, Edelmann S, Rybka D, Schrag TA, Frisch M, Dickinson HG, Melchinger AE, Scholten S (2018) Parental expression variation of small RNAs is negatively correlated with grain yield heterosis in a maize breeding population. Front Plant Sci 9: 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shen H, He H, Li J, Chen W, Wang X, Guo L, Peng Z, He G, Zhong S, Qi Y, et al. (2012) Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression changes in two Arabidopsis ecotypes and their reciprocal hybrids. Plant Cell 24: 875–892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu E, Vaahtera L, Hõrak H, Hincha DK, Heyer AG, Brosché M (2015) Quantitative trait loci mapping and transcriptome analysis reveal candidate genes regulating the response to ozone in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ 38: 1418–1433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang J, Mezmouk S, Baumgarten A, Buckler ES, Guill KE, McMullen MD, Mumm RH, Ross-Ibarra J (2017) Incomplete dominance of deleterious alleles contributes substantially to trait variation and heterosis in maize. PLoS Genet 13: e1007019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES