Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 1987 Jul-Aug;102(4):438–444.

Reported vague symptoms and at-risk status: the case of polyvinyl chloride workers in Louisville.

R G Sands, R A Greenberg
PMCID: PMC1477876  PMID: 3112857

Abstract

This study concerns the frequency of visits to the dispensary by workers with vague symptoms of physical illness at a polyvinyl chloride plant in Louisville, KY, where an outbreak of hepatic angiosarcoma occurred. The illness behavior of three cohorts of workers at three levels of risk--workers removed from the chemical plant to a pallet plant (PP) because their screening results indicated liver abnormalities; workers who had some positive test results (TP); and workers whose test results were negative (TN)--was studied before (time 1) and after (time 2) the angiosarcoma crisis. It was predicted that, during time 2, the groups' visits to the dispensary would increase in relation to their levels of risk (PP greater than TP greater than TN). Although there was an overall increase in the percentage of visits because of vague symptoms during time 2, the only cohort with different behavior was the group of TP workers: they reduced their use of the dispensary. These results are similar to those in a previous study in which all symptoms of illness were included. It is speculated that social and individual factors, as well as the labeling phenomenon, explain the results. Health care providers are encouraged to follow up with workers at risk who seem to avoid monitoring their health.

Full text

PDF
438

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arluke A., Kennedy L., Kessler R. C. Reexamining the sick-role concept: an empirical assessment. J Health Soc Behav. 1979 Mar;20(1):30–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BURSTEN B., D ESOPO R. THE OBLIGATION TO REMAIN SICK. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Apr;12:402–407. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720340074011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banks F. R., Keller M. D. Symptom experience and health action. Med Care. 1971 Nov-Dec;9(6):498–502. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197111000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chalfant H. P., Kurtz R. A. Alcoholics and the sick role: assessments by social workers. J Health Soc Behav. 1971 Mar;12(1):66–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hetherington R. W., Hopkins C. E. Symptom sensitivity: its social and cultural correlates. Health Serv Res. 1969 Spring;4(1):63–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KASSEBAUM G. G., BAUMANN B. O. DIMENSIONS OF THE SICK ROLE IN CHRONIC ILLNESS. J Health Hum Behav. 1965;6:16–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kasl S. V., Cobb S. Health behavior, illness behavior, and sick role behavior. I. Health and illness behavior. Arch Environ Health. 1966 Feb;12(2):246–266. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1966.10664365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shuval J. T., Antonovsky A. Illness: a mechanism for coping with failure. Soc Sci Med. 1973 Apr;7(4):259–265. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(73)90095-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Suls J., Mullen B. Life events, perceived control and illness: the role of uncertainty. J Human Stress. 1981 Jun;7(2):30–34. doi: 10.1080/0097840X.1981.9936824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tessler R., Mechanic D., Dimond M. The effect of psychological distress on physician utilization: a prospective study. J Health Soc Behav. 1976 Dec;17(4):353–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zola I. K. Culture and symptoms--an analysis of patients' presenting complaints. Am Sociol Rev. 1966 Oct;31(5):615–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES