Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2020 Jul 14;8:e54754. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e54754

Seasonal records of benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream on the eastern edge of the Iguaçu National Park, Brazil

Jhenifer Simões Santos 1,✉, Luciano Lazzarini Wolff 1, Lucíola Thais Baldan 2, Ana Tereza Bittencourt Guimarães 1
PMCID: PMC7381443  PMID: 32754002

Abstract

Background

Iguaçu National Park (INP) is known worldwide due to Iguaçu Waterfalls, being considered a World Natural Heritage by UNESCO. The INP is one of the last large forested extensions of inland Brazil that provides protection to the Atlantic Forest, one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots. However, its Natural Heritage status has been threatened by the construction and operation of the Baixo Iguaçu dam, agricultural and urban impacts on its boundaries and the increasing interest of the Brazilian government in re-opening of the “Colono road”, an old illegal road that crossed the interior of the park. Indeed, since benthic macroinvertebrates have been widely used for the environmental assessment of streams, records and abundance of their taxa under different seasonal periods may provide an additional dataset for biomonitoring of hydrographic systems in the face of current anthropogenic impacts on the INP boundaries and other similar streams on forest edges.

New information

In this study, we improved the sampling design of benthic macroinvertebrates and provided seasonal records covering distinct precipitation/temperature periods between 2016 and 2017 of a stream on the eastern edge of the Iguaçu National Park, Brazil. The records total 2,840 individuals distributed in 88 different taxa. The most abundant taxa were the Diptera subfamilies, Chironominae (n = 1,487) and Tanypodinae (n = 256), besides the Heterelmis genus (n = 152, Elmidae; Coleoptera). Diptera was the richest order in number of families (n = 8), while Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) was the richest taxonomic family in number of genera (n = 11). Aegla (Crustacea) and the Insecta genera, Heterelmis, Hexacylloepus, Noelmis, Phylloicus and Thraulodes, were recorded through all samplings. Twenty-five genera of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera (EPT) and Odonata were recorded during intermediate precipitation/temperature periods. Twenty-one of them were recorded in May 2016, with five genera standing out in abundance (Hydrosmilodon, Anacroneuria, Argia, Coryphaeschna, Americabaetis) and four (Needhamella, Tikuna, Simothraulopsis, Neocordulia) in December 2016. Four general taxa were exclusive of the lower precipitation/temperature period (August 2016), standing out in abundance were the Oxystigma (Odonata) and Corydalus (Megaloptera) genera. In March 2017 (higher precipitation/temperature period), four exclusive taxa were recorded, amongst them, the Chimarra (Trichoptera) genus. Furthermore, seasonal records demonstrated higher occurrences and abundance of macroinvertebrates during the intermediate and lower precipitation/temperature periods, besides a varied taxa composition throughout the year, with the presence of both sensitive and tolerant groups to environmental impacts. Our findings suggest that the number and composition of the local-stream macrobenthic fauna were influenced by the seasonal climatic regime. These changes should be considered in the limnological monitoring developed on the hydrographic systems of INP eastern edges to improve the assessment of environmental quality under different local seasonal conditions.

Keywords: Macroinvertebrates records, biodiversity, aquatic insects, seasonal precipitation, INP, forest edge stream, surrounding management

Introduction

Behind the scenic beauty provided by the Waterfalls, the Iguaçu National Park (INP) represents the largest forest remnant in southern Brazil for biodiversity protection of the inland Atlantic Forest, one of the most biodiverse and threatened biomes (Marchese 2015). The INP has an extension of sub-tropical broadleaf forest of somewhat over 185 thousand hectares (ICMBio 2018). It is comprised of a transition zone between Mixed Ombrophilous Forest and Semideciduous Seasonal Forest, two distinct Atlantic Forest physiognomies (Joly et al. 1999). There are 761 angiosperms, about 250 of them being arboreal species (ICMBio 2018) and 84 mammal species, including some endangered ones, such as the jaguar, puma and tapir (Brocardo et al. 2019). The INP’s terrestrial fauna is also estimated to comprise more than 550 birds, 635 butterflies, 79 reptiles and 55 amphibians (WWF-Brazil 2014) and for aquatic fauna, 18 species of stream fish (Delariva et al. 2018) and 193 taxa of benthic macroinvertebrates at hydrographic systems that flow to below the Waterfall (Moretto and Pujarra 2017) are reported.

Despite internal conservation, INP’s Natural Heritage status, granted by UNESCO in 1986, has been threatened by the construction and operation of the Baixo Iguaçu dam (UNESCO 2012, UNESCO 2019), besides the impacts of agriculture, urbanism and highways (i.e. BR163 and BR277) on its eastern boundaries (Fig. 1). Nowadays, the INP eastern edges are surrounded by a landscape that has been heavily altered by logging, intensification of industrial and small-scale agriculture and silviculture for pulp and paper. Nevertheless, there are no buffer strips or adequate land use planning in adjacent areas to minimise the edge effects on the INP eastern boundaries. Other threats to INP consist of agricultural encroachments, poaching and plant extractions, beyond the increasing interest by the Brazilian government (with the bills PL 984/2019 and PLC 61/2013 in process at the National Congress) to re-open the “Colono road”, an antique illegal road that crossed the interior of the park, from Serranópolis do Iguaçu to Capanema municipalities (UNESCO 2019).

Land use characteristics in the INP eastern edge surroundings.

Figure 1a.

Figure 1a.

Land use characteristics on sampling site adjacent areas. Source: Google Earth Pro (image date 07/21/2019).

Figure 1b.

Figure 1b.

Baixo Iguaçu Dam. Source: Google Earth Pro (image date 10/11/2019).

Open in a new tab

Regarding the hydrography, the INP stands out for hosting the unique entirely preserved hydrographic basin of Paraná State, the Floriano River basin. Other micro-basins, such as those of Silva Jardim and São João Rivers, which flow across the park, are partially preserved (ICMBio 2018). Along the INP eastern edge are the Gonçalves Dias River main channel and its tributary Jumelo Stream that flows to Iguaçu River and, with the others, contribute to the discharge from the Waterfall. This hydrographic system is on the border between the right bank preserved by the INP and the left bank subjected to urban, agricultural and industrial influences. Despite antagonism between preservation and impacts, only recently the fish fauna of this system has been studied (Neves et al. 2015, Delariva et al. 2018) and no benthic macroinvertebrates record has been made.

Benthic macroinvertebrates constitute a polyphyletic clustering of organisms, which colonise bottom substrates and dwell part or the whole of their lifetimes in aquatic ecosystems (Rosenberg and Resh 1993). Platyhelminthes, Mollusca, Annelida, Crustacea and many immature Insecta forms stand out in richness, abundance, lifestyles and levels of sensitivity to environmental stressors (Chang et al. 2013). For these reasons, macroinvertebrates have long been used as model organisms for stream biomonitoring (Baptista 2008, Buss et al. 2015). Therefore, records of macroinvertebrates allow long-term analyses of changes in environment quality that may reflect in a historical process of stream degradation, as organic/industrial pollution, discharge variations, silting and others (Hepp et al. 2010, Wright and Ryan 2016, Castro et al. 2018).

In this context, seasonal records of benthic macroinvertebrates, along with measurements of water physicochemical parameters in local hydrographic systems, can contribute to the upgrading of INP’s limnological monitoring programme. This programme is a condition imposed by the ICMBio (environment sector responsible by the INP administration) for the Baixo Iguaçu dam operation. Therefore, the monitoring may identify livestock activities and dumping of wastewater or even the dam impacts on Iguaçu River’s tributaries (ICMBio 2018, UNESCO 2019). Additionally, since seasonality may imply the structuring of the macroinvertebrate community, changing their habitat conditions and food availability (Linares et al. 2013), seasonal records of macroinvertebrates may provide a dataset to verify the effects of the interaction between local anthropogenic impacts and seasonal influences.

Seasonal climatic changes may indirectly affect the abundance of benthic macroinvertebrates on their habitat-substrates. For example, rainiest periods cause additional runoff and increasing river discharge, which may intensify macroinvertebrates drifting (Callisto and Goulart 2005). These effects might be substantially heaviest on the more impermeable catchments and on invertebrates that dwell in sandy microhabitats, which are more easily carried downstream (Allan 2004). On the other hand, drier and colder periods may promote the macroinvertebrates colonisation as a function of habitat stabilisation and dissolved oxygen enrichment into the water (Kaller and Kelso 2006, Carvalho et al. 2008). Therefore, it is important to consider the seasonal influences for improving stream monitoring based on macroinvertebrates, since their occurrence and abundance in different habitats may change according to each period of environmental variation.

The INP region and the western part of Paraná State has a history of changes, over the annual period, for their precipitation and temperature regimes. There is no extreme drought or flooding, but a contrast between periods of lower and higher rainfall/temperature, alternated by transitory climatic conditions (Carvalho and Stipp 2004). In this context, it is expected that streams of this region present over-year variations on their flows and water temperature, implying seasonal shifts on macroinvertebrates numbers and composition. It might result in macroinvertebrates increasing during intermediate and low precipitation/temperature and the opposite under contrasting conditions. Therefore, it is suggested that stream diagnoses could depend on the seasonal periods, being unable to reflect entire conditions if made in only one climatic phase.

In the face of that, we provide seasonal records of benthic macroinvertebrates between 2016 and 2017 in a stream on the eastern edge of the Iguaçu National Park, southern Brazil. The Jumelo Stream is one of the sampling sites of a broader project that aims to understand the ecology of macroinvertebrates in rural and forested streams in the region. In this sense, we also recorded the water physicochemical parameters and the taxon abundance categories that may contribute to a local limnological monitoring programme. Our purpose was to discuss seasonal records in an associative way with the habitat characteristics and environmental sensitivity of macroinvertebrates. Implications of the surrounding management were also discussed for effective conservation of macroinvertebrates in local stream systems.

Material and Methods

Study area

Sampling was carried out between May 2016 and March 2017, comprising periods of intermediate precipitation and decreasing temperature (May 2016); lower precipitation and temperature (August 2016); higher precipitation and increasing temperature (December 2016) and higher precipitation and temperature (March 2017) for the region (Fig. 2). Hereafter, May and December 2016 are reported as intermediate precipitation/temperature periods, according to Carvalho and Stipp (2004), which define the Apr/May/Jun and Oct/Nov/Dec quarters as periods of climatic transition for the region. The Jumelo Stream is a second-order river of the lower Iguaçu River basin, Western Paraná State, Brazil (Fig. 3). This stream begins at the peri-urban area of the Santa Tereza do Oeste municipality (25°04'46.62" S, 53°37'26.42'' W) and flows in a southern direction, bordering the INP eastern edge. The Jumelo Stream micro-basin has 62% of its area covered by vegetation (mainly because it is part of the INP), 25% by agricultural area and 13% by urban area (Delariva et al. 2018). The right margin of the stream borders the INP and has greater vegetation regeneration (Fig. 4a, b). On the left margin, there is a narrowed riparian vegetation, less than 10 m wide and less regeneration (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, its surroundings consist of a farm with pasture and agricultural uses (Fig. 4d).

Climatic regime for the Jumelo Stream region.

Figure 2a.

Figure 2a.

Monthly precipitation: Horizontal line indicates the median, x represents the average, the box includes 50% of the data, from the 25th to the 75th percentile, the vertical lines extend to the 10th and 90th percentiles and the circles are extremes values. Data refer to the period from January 2000 to December 2019. Source: AGUASPARANÁ.

Figure 2b.

Figure 2b.

Monthly air temperature. Symbols follow (a). Data refer to the period from January 2016 to December 2019. Source: IAPAR.

Open in a new tab

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Sampling point (black circle) in the Jumelo Stream. Source: Adapted from Neves et al. (2015).

Sampling reach characteristics of the Jumelo Stream.

Figure 4a.

Figure 4a.

Right margin bordering the INP.

Figure 4b.

Figure 4b.

Greater plant regeneration on the right margin than on the left margin.

Figure 4c.

Figure 4c.

Narrowed riparian vegetation on the left margin.

Figure 4d.

Figure 4d.

Edifications and grassland use on the left margin.

Open in a new tab

Sampling of macroinvertebrates and laboratory procedures

Sampling of macroinvertebrate fauna was carried out in triplicate on the following substrate categories: fine (sand/clay < 5 mm and gravel of 5-15 mm in diameter), coarse (pebbles of 25-50 mm and cobbles > 50 mm) and leaf litter (leaves and branches of riparian vegetation). Collection was performed using a Surber sampler (0.5 mm mesh), totalling 36 samples. The sampling design attempted to distance the samples more than 5 m from each other, thus providing seasonal records with greater dataset independence. The entire sampling process and laboratory procedures performed with macroinvertebrates are in accordance with the methodology described in the protocol for sampling and preparing benthic macroinvertebrates samples (Santos et al. 2020). All recorded macroinvertebrates were identified in order/suborder, family/subfamily or genera levels (Mugnai et al. 2010, Dias et al. 2006, Salles et al. 2004, Hamada and Silva 2014, Pes et al. 2005, Passos et al. 2007, Trivinho-Strixino and Strixino 1995, Costa et al. 2004), except Nematomorpha phylum. They are available for study in the didactic collection of the Laboratory of Water Quality and Limnology of the Federal University of Paraná (LaQal) - UFPR/Palotina.

Water physical and chemical characterisation

Water physical and chemical parameters were measured at each substrate category of sampling. The data obtained by a multiparameter equipment for water analysis (HORIBA®) were: pH (hydrogen potential), water temperature (oC), conductivity (µS.cm-1), turbidity (NTU), dissolved oxygen (mg.l-1) and total dissolved solids (ml.l-1). To verify significant variations amongst the sampling periods in the water physical and chemical variables, a One-way ANOVA was performed. Subsequently, the HSD-Tukey multiple comparison test was applied to determine which averages differed. Analysis were performed on the software Statistica 7.0 (Statsoft 2004).

Results

The most variations in the water physical and chemical parameters were found for water temperature, which increased significantly from May 2016 to March 2017 (Table 1), reflecting the passage from intermediate/lower temperature (autumn/winter/spring) to higher temperature (summer) periods. Other water variables showed significant differences, for example, pH and turbidity were slightly higher in March 2017 and May/August 2016, respectively, but without any seasonal patterns of changes.

Table 1.

Mean ± standard deviation of Jumelo Stream water physical and chemical parameters. DO = dissolved oxygen. Asterisks indicate significance and equal letters indicate statistical similarity amongst seasons. F de Snedecor of One-way ANOVA.

May/2016 Aug/2016 Dec/2016 Mar/2017 F(3,32) p-value
Temperature (°C) 15.75 ± 0.05d 19.04 ± 0.37c 20.31 ± 0.17b 20.76 ± 0.16a 824.00 < 0.0001*
DO (mg.l-1) 9.75 ± 0.29a 8.43 ± 1.16b 8.47 ± 0.85b 9.26 ± 0.87ab 5.06 0.006*
pH (hydrogen potential) 7.24 ± 0.14b 6.82 ± 0.35c 6.87 ± 0.49bc 8.00 ± 0.18a 26.11 < 0.0001*
Conductivity (µS.cm-1) 0.0287 ± 0.005c 0.034 ± 0.002ab 0.032 ± 0.003bc 0.035 ± 0.0005a 8.95 0.0002*
Turbidity (NTU) 11.27 ± 2.40b 13.45 ± 0.74a 9.06 ± 1.08c 10.29 ± 0.39bc 16.27 < 0.0001*
Total solids (ml.l-1) 0.019 ± 0.003b 0.022 ± 0.001a 0.02 ± 0.001ab 0.23 ± 0.00a 8.22 < 0.0001*
Open in a new tab

A total of 2,840 macroinvertebrate individuals were collected, comprising 88 different taxa in five phyla, six classes, 17 orders/suborders, 46 families/subfamilies and 57 genera (Table 2). The Diptera subfamilies, Chironominae (n = 1487) and Tanypodinae (n = 256), the Heterelmis genus (n = 152, Elmidae; Coleoptera) and the Naididae family (n = 120, Oligochaeta) were the most abundant taxa. Insects stood out, with Diptera being the richest order in number of families (n = 8), followed by Coleoptera (n = 7), Odonata (n = 7) and Trichoptera (n = 6). The richest taxonomic family was Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) with 11 genera, followed by Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) and Elmidae (Coleoptera) with six genera each and Gomphidae (Odonata) with five genera. Platyhelminthes and Mollusca were represented by only one taxon with only one individual each (Dugesiidae and Sphaeriidae, respectively), while Nematomorpha (n = 2) was the only taxon identified in the high taxonomic level of phylum.

Table 2.

Macroinvertebrates records of the Jumelo Stream, eastern edge of the Iguaçu National Park. Abundance classes correspond to: Very low (VL; 1-5), low (L; 6-10), medium (M; 11-50), high (H; 51-100) and very high (VH; > 100) captured individuals.

Phylum/
Class		 Order/
Suborder		 Family/
Subfamily		 Genus May 2016 Aug 2016 Dec 2016 Mar 2017
Platyhelminthes
Turbellaria 		Tricladida Dugesiidae VL
Nematomorpha VL
Mollusca
Bivalvia 		Veneroida Sphaeriidae VL
Annelida
Oligochaeta 		Haplotaxida Naididae M M L M
Annelida
Hirudinea 		Rhynchobdellida Glossiphoniidae VL VL
Arthropoda
Malacostraca 		Decapoda Aeglidae Aegla M M M M
Atyidae VL
Amphipoda VL
Arthropoda
Insecta 		Collembola Entomobryidae VL VL
Ephemeroptera Baetidae L
Americabaetis VL VL
Baetodes L VL VL
Camelobaetidius VL VL
Cloeodes VL VL L
Cryptonympha VL VL
Moribaetis VL
Caenidae Caenis VL VL VL
Leptohyphidae Leptohyphes VL
Traverhyphes VL
Tricorythodes VL
Leptophlebiidae VL
Farrodes VL VL
Hagenulopsis VL
Hydrosmilodon L
Hylister L VL
Massartella VL VL VL
Meridialaris VL
Miroculis L VL VL
Needhamella VL
Simothraulopsis VL
Thraulodes VL VL VL L
Tikuna VL
Odonata Anisoptera Aeshnidae VL VL
Coryphaeschna VL
Corduliidae Neocordulia VL
Gomphidae VL VL
Progomphus M VL VL
Cacoides VL
Agriogomphus VL
Gomphoides VL VL
Phyllocycla VL
Libellulidae VL
Perithemis VL
Anatya VL
Brechmorhoga VL
Macrothemis VL
Odonata Zygoptera VL
Calopterygidae Mnesarete VL
Coenagrionidae Argia L
Megapodagrionidae L
Heteragrion M VL
Oxystigma M
Plecoptera Gripopterygidae Gripopteryx VL
Paragripopteryx L M VL
Tupiperla M VL M
Perlidae Anacroneuria L
Megaloptera Corydalidae Corydalus VL
Coleoptera Curculionidae VL
Dytiscidae VL VL VL
Elmidae Heterelmis H M M M
Hexacylloepus M M L VL
Macrelmis VL VL VL
Microcylloepus VL
Noelmis VL VL VL VL
Phanocerus VL
Hydrophilidae VL
Lutrochidae Lutrochus VL VL VL
Psephenidae M VL L VL
Ptilodactylidae VL
Lepidoptera Crambidae VL
Trichoptera Calamoceratidae Phylloicus M VL L VL
Ecnomidae Austrotinodes VL
Hydrobiosidae Atopsyche VL
Hydropsychidae Macronema VL M
Smicridea M L
Leptoceridae Nectopsyche VL VL VL
Oecetis VL VL
Philopotamidae Chimarra VL
Diptera Ceratopogonidae L VL VL VL
Chironomidae Chironominae VH VH VH M
Chironomidae Orthocladiinae M M M
Chironomidae Tanypodinae H M VH L
Empididae L VL VL VL
Muscidae VL
Psychodidae VL VL
Simuliidae M L L L
Stratiomyidae VL
Tipulidae VL
Open in a new tab

Six genera were common to the four sampling periods (Aeglidae: Aegla; Elmidae: Heterelmis, Hexacylloepus, Noelmis; Calamoceratidae: Phylloicus; Leptophlebiidae: Thraulodes) (Table 2). Twenty-five genera of EPT and Odonata were recorded exclusively in the intermediate precipitation/temperature periods. Twenty-one of them, standing out in abundance Hydrosmilodon, Anacroneuria, Argia, Coryphaeschna and Americabaetis, were recorded in May 2016 and four (Needhamella, Tikuna, Simothraulopsis, Neocordulia) in December 2016. Sixty-four taxa, standing out in abundance the Heterelmis, Hexacylloepus (Coleoptera), Phylloicus (Trichoptera), Heteragrion (Odonata) and Smicridea (Trichoptera) genera, were recorded in May 2016, while 41 different taxa were recorded in December 2016. In the lower precipitation/temperature period (August 2016), 38 taxa were recorded, five of them exclusive, with higher abundance for the Oxystigma (Odonata) and Corydalus (Megaloptera) genera. In the higher precipitation/temperature period (March 2017), only 26 taxa were recorded, with four of them exclusive, including the genus Chimarra (Trichoptera).

Discussion

Chironomidae was the most abundant family collected, as found in other aquatic systems (Batista et al. 2010, Barbola et al. 2011). Chironomids can colonise preserved and impacted environments, which make the mixed environmental conditions of Jumelo Stream propitious to their success. In this group, the Chironominae subfamily tends to be predominant (Sanseverino and Nessimian 2008). Its high abundance might be related to its wide distribution in stream systems and their position in basal trophic levels (Sanseverino and Nessimian 2008). The second subfamily ranked in abundance, Tanypodinae, could benefit from the high abundance of other chironomids due its predatory habit (Rieradevall and Brooks 2001). Heterelmis (Coleoptera: Elmidae), the third most abundant taxon, occurred with at least ten individuals in all the samplings. This genus is predominant amongst other Elmidae (Arias-Díaz et al. 2007) and is typically found in leaf litter and rocky substrate microhabitats (Cooke et al. 2015, Braun et al. 2014).

Diptera, Coleoptera, Odonata and Trichoptera were the richest orders in number of families. These orders are typical in studies of benthic macroinvertebrates (Hepp et al. 2010, Moretto and Pujarra 2017, Restello et al. 2020). They show, in this sequence, a decrease in their tolerance to anthropogenic impacts (Chang et al. 2013). Naididae (Oligochaeta) and Aegla, which were recorded in all samples, are tolerant to impacts (Goulart and Callisto 2003) and foraging in sandy and leaf litter microhabitats, respectively. The low occurrence of other taxa as Platyhelminthes (Dugesiidae), Nematomorpha and Mollusca (Sphaeriidae) may be related to the dominance of Insecta.

Leptophlebiidae (Ephemeroptera) was the richest family in number of genera. Thraulodes was recorded in all samplings and showed preference for coarse substrate, according to Shimano et al. (2012). Miroculis and the other genera occurred at lowest abundance categories and only in intermediate and lower precipitation/temperature periods, corroborating with Shimano et al. (2012). These authors also reported that low rainfall enables Miroculis to colonise rocky substrates. Thraulodes and Farrodes were the only ones to occur during the higher precipitation/temperature period (March 2017). Although we were not able to test this here, these findings suggest a hypothesis of greater downstream dislodgement of Ephemeroptera genera during higher flows within higher precipitation periods. Moreover, Baetodes (Baetidae) was amongst the only three genera of Ephemeroptera also recorded in the higher precipitation/temperature period. Other genera of Baetidae were represented by Americabaetis, Cloeodes, Cryptonympha, Moribaetis and Camelobaetidius. Siegloch et al. (2008) reported the first three and Baetodes in relatively preserved streams. According to Edmunds et al. 1976, Baetodes occurs in removed riparian vegetation streams, where solar irradiation allows algae growing and grazing. Otherwise, Dominguez et al. 2006 associate Americabaetis with preserved riparian vegetation, but it was also found in impacted environments (Castro et al. 2018). Therefore, records of Ephemeroptera revealed genera with distinct levels of environmental sensitivity and ability to resist the increase in stream flow.

Trichoptera are sensitive to impacts and were also amongst the richest in number of families. Hydropsychidae presented two genera. Smicridea was more abundant than Macronema and exclusive in intermediate and lower precipitation/temperature periods. Corroborating Spies and Froehlich (2009), Smicridea was also recorded in rocky microhabitats. Phylloicus (Calamoceratidae) occurred in all the samplings, but was more abundant in intermediate precipitation/temperature periods. This genus was recorded on leaf litter substrate, as registered by Fidelis et al. (2008). Chimarra (Philopotamidae) was recorded only in the higher precipitation/temperature period. Unlike Phylloicus, Chimarra is not an indicator of preserved sites (Henriques-Oliveira et al. 2015). Plecoptera, also sensitive to impacts, was represented by Perlidae and Gripopterygidae. In Perlidae, Anacroneuria, recorded only in May 2016 (intermediate), shows predator behaviour associated with leaf litter microhabitats (Avelino-Capistrano et al. 2017), but here it was exclusive in coarse substrates. Regarding Gripopterygidae, Paragripopteryx was recorded in higher precipitation/temperature and other periods, while Gripopteryx was recorded in intermediate (May 2016) and Tupiperla was recorded in intermediate and lower precipitation/temperature periods. These genera occur in riffles with high levels of dissolved oxygen (Bispo et al. 2002) and may have benefited from the lowest water temperatures.

Odonata is amongst the most tolerant macroinvertebrates. Progomphus (Gomphidae), recorded in intermediate and higher precipitation/temperature periods, is adapted to burrowing itself into sandy substrate where it ambushes prey (Kikuchi and Uieda 2005). Unlike most Odonata recognised for their tolerance, Heteragrion (Megapodagrionidae), which was abundant and exclusive in intermediate and lower precipitation/temperature periods, is sensitive to environmental deterioration (Ferreira-Peruquetti and Marco-Jr 2002). Oxystigma was abundant and exclusively found in the lower precipitation/temperature period (August 2016). This exclusivity may be related to different thermoregulatory strategies in Odonata (Carvalho et al. 2013). Regarding Coleoptera, Heterelmis, Hexacylloepus, Noelmis (Elmidae), as the Psephenidae family, were recorded in all the samplings. Elmidae is abundant and a generalist found in different habitats (Braun et al. 2014). Psephenidae has dorsoventrally flattened body, adapted to fast currents, and is an indicator of good environmental quality (Hanson et al. 2010)

In general, although there is no temporal replication to test predictions, macroinvertebrates records were higher in intermediate and lower precipitation/temperature periods. On the other hand, only 26 general taxa occurred in higher precipitation/temperature period (March 2017), which corroborate this exploratory study with the hypothesis of seasonal influences of other authors (Callisto and Goulart 2005, Carvalho et al. 2008). A mechanism that may explain these results is that Jumelo Stream is near to Santa Tereza do Oeste city. It becomes another potential impacting cause, besides agricultural influences on its left side. Therefore, highest local rainfall may quickly overcome the capacity for soil infiltration (Lima 2008) and, in impermeable soils, like those near Jumelo Stream, the surface run-off into the stream occurs suddenly (personal observation). This run-off contributes to silting and increasing the stream turbidity with possible effects on habitat structure and occurrence of macroinvertebrates (Allan 2004). Furthermore, the reduced riparian vegetation on the left margin increase these impacts, contributing to an abrupt increase in discharge and its consequences for macroinvertebrates dislodgement. Increasing in water temperature and local irradiance are other factors of the edge effect on the INP eastern limits, which may affect macroinvertebrates communities (Suga and Tanaka 2012, Carvalho et al. 2013)

The high number of taxa, many of them being sensitive to impacts, highlights the importance of the INP forested areas. Since the right margin is preserved, it provides a mosaic of microhabitat environments in the Jumelo Stream, which support multiple taxa with different levels of sensitivity and habitat preferences. Therefore, it is relevant that terrestrial units of conservation are seen with their potential to extend their conservation objectives to freshwater systems (Suski and Cooke 2006). The surroundings of conservation units should be managed to protect watersheds or substantial reaches of river courses (Saunders et al. 2002), in order to avoid excessive run-off and pollution (Derisio 2017). In the case of Jumelo Stream, management should cover from rainwater containment to land use rules of its surroundings.

Conclusion

The dataset indicated a diverse fauna, composed of 88 different taxa, with distinct levels of environmental sensitivity. Seasonal records showed higher occurrences, abundance and exclusivities in intermediate and lower precipitation/temperature periods. Lower records in the higher precipitation period (March 2017) may be associated with increased run-off and consequent macroinvertebrates drifting. These findings highlight the importance of the INP forested areas, as well as drawing attention to the need for an adequate management of its surroundings and edges. For the Jumelo Stream and other similar streams located at the forest edge, management is necessary to include buffer zones with specific rules and restrictions of land use to reduce local anthropogenic impacts on aquatic biodiversity. Nevertheless, the results indicate the necessity for considering the seasonal effects on the macroinvertebrates fauna to improve the limnological monitoring of the local hydrographic systems, provided in the INP management plan.

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Western Paraná State University – Campus Cascavel and Federal University of Paraná – Sector Palotina for providing infrastructure. We are also grateful to our colleagues of the Biological Investigations Laboratory Andressa Bach, Melissa Paoletti, João Ricardo V. Assis, Paulo A. D. Forcelini, Julio Cesar C. Jr., Gabriel Augusto P. Souza and the colleagues Jéssica S. Ribeiro and Jaqueline Celante of the Water Quality and Limnology Laboratory - UFPR, who were directly or indirectly involved in the project execution, providing support in field collections, laboratory identification of macroinvertebrates and statistical analysis. We are also grateful to Stephany M. Wharton of Celera Translations Ltda. for the language revision.

Hosting institution

Western Paraná State University – Campus Cascavel, Brazil.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

Hosting institution

Western Paraná State University – Campus Cascavel, Brazil.

Author contributions

The research project, including the sampling design that this study is part of, was conceived by LLW, LTB and ATBG. The three authors along with JSS carried out the fieldwork. The manuscript was drafted by JSS and LLW. JSS and LTB identified the macroinvertebrates. JSS and ATBG analysed the water physical and chemical variables. JSS and LLW wrote the final version of the paper. LTB and ATBG reviewed the previous versions and added intellectual content. All authors read and consented to the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.

References

  1. Dominguez Eduardo, Molineri Carlos, Pescador Manuel L, Hubbard Michael D, Nieto Carolina. Ephemeroptera of South America. In: Adis Joachim, Arias Jorge R, Rueda-Delgado Guillermo, Wantzen Karl Matthias., editors. Aquatic Biodiversity in Latin America. Vol. 2. Pensoft; Moscow: 2006. 646. [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan J. David. Landscapes and Riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2004;35:257–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arias-Díaz Diego Mauricio, Reinoso-Flórez Gladys, Guevara-Cardona Giovany, Villa-Navarro Francisco Antonio. Distribución espacial y temporal de los coleópteros acuáticos en la cuenca del Río Coello (Tolima, Colombia) https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/39222/41074 Caldasia. 2007;29(1):177–194. [Google Scholar]
  4. Avelino-Capistrano Fernanda, Almeida Gisele Luziane, Barbosa Leandro Silva. Diversidade e distribuição de ninfas de Plecoptera (Insecta) por substratos em riachos do Parque Estadual da Pedra Branca, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. https://www.periodico.ebras.bio.br/ojs/index.php/ebras/article/view/ebrasilis.v10i2.680/425. EntomoBrasilis. 2017;10(2):76–81. doi: 10.12741/ebrasilis.v10i2.680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baptista Darcilio Fernandes. Uso de macroinvertebrados em procedimentos de biomonitoramento em ecossistemas aquáticos. Oecologia Brasiliensis. 2008;12(3):425–441. doi: 10.4257/oeco.2008.1203.05. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barbola Ivana Freitas, Moraes Marcos FPG de, Anazawa Tathiane Mayumi, Nascimento Elynton Alves, Sepka Everton Roger, Polegatto Cleber Macedo, Milléo Julianne, Schühli Guilherme Schnell. Avaliação da comunidade de macroinvertebrados aquáticos como ferramentapara o monitoramento de um reservatório na bacia do Rio Pitangui, Paraná, Brasil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 2011;101(1-2):15–23. doi: 10.1590/S0073-47212011000100002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Batista Hugo Ultramari, Barbola Ivana Freitas, Kloth Alberto Estefano Guilherme, Milléo Julianne. Estrutura e composição da fauna de macroinvertebrados como forma deavaliação da qualidade da água do rio Verde, em Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brasil. https://revistas.apps.uepg.br/index.php/tp/article/view/1876/2427. Terra Plural. 2010;4(2):241–256. doi: 10.5212/TerraPlural.v.4i2.0006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bispo Pitágoras Conceição, Froehlich Cláudio Gilberto, Oliveira Leandro Gonçalves. Stonefly (Plecoptera) fauna of streams in a mountainous area of Central Brazil: abiotic factors and nymph density. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 2002;19:325–334. doi: 10.1590/s0101-81752002000500026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Braun Bruna Marmitt, Salvarrey Andrea Vanesa Batalla, Kotzian Carla Bender, Spies Marcia Regina, Pires Mateus Marques. Diversity and distribution of riffle beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Elmidae) in montane rivers of Southern Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 2014;14(2):1–11. doi: 10.1590/1676-060320140615183046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brocardo Carlos Rodrigo, Silva Marina Xavier, Ferracioli Paula, Cândido-Jr José Flávio, Bianconi Gledson Vigiano, Moraes Marcela Figuêredo Duarte, Galetti Mauro, Passamani Marcelo, Policena Adaildo, Reis Nélio Roberto dos, Crawshaw-Jr Peter. Mamíferos do Parque Nacional do Iguaçu. Oecologia Australis. 2019;23(2):165–190. doi: 10.4257/oeco.2019.2302.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buss Daniel F, Carlisle Daren M, Chon Tae-Soo, Culp Joseph, Harding Jon S, Keizer-Vlek Hanneke E, Robinson Wayne A, Strachan Stephanie, Thirion Christa, Hughes Robert M. Stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe: a comparison of large-scale programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2015;187(1):4132. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4132-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Callisto Marcos, Goulart Michael. Invertebrate drift along a longitudinal gradient in a Neotropical stream in Serra do Cipó National Park, Brazil. Hydrobiologia. 2005;539(1):47–56. doi: 10.1007/s10750-004-3245-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carvalho Emerson Machado, Uieda Virgínia Sanches, Motta Rosinês Luciana. Colonization of rocky and leaf pack substrates by benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream in Southeast Brazil. http://seer.sis.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/bioikos/article/view/817/797 Bioikos. 2008;22(1):37–44. [Google Scholar]
  14. Carvalho Fernando Geraldo, Pinto Nelson Silva, Oliveira-Jr José Max Barbosa, Juen Leandro. Effects of marginal vegetation removal on Odonata communities. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 2013;25(1):10–18. doi: 10.1590/s2179-975x2013005000013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carvalho Silvia Méri, Stipp Nilza Aparecida Freres. Contribuição ao estudo do balanço hídrico no Estado do Paraná: uma proposta de classificação qualitativa. http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/geografia/article/view/6790/6112 Geografia (Londrina) 2004;13(1):57–71. [Google Scholar]
  16. Castro Diego Marcel Parreira, Dolédec Sylvain, Callisto Marcos. Land cover disturbance homogenizes aquatic insect functional structure in neotropical savanna streams. Ecological Indicators. 2018;84:573–582. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chang F-H, Lawrence Justin E, Rios-Touma Blanca, Resh Vincent H. Tolerance values of benthic macroinvertebrates for stream biomonitoring: assessment of assumptions underlying scoring systems worldwide. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2013;186(4):2135–2149. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3523-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cooke Maria, Longley Glenn, Gibson Randy. Spring association and microhabitat preferences of the Comal Springs riffle beetle (Heterelmis comalensis) The Southwestern Naturalist. 2015;60(1):110–121. doi: 10.1894/swnat-d-14-00017r1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Costa Janira Martins, Souza Luiz Onofre Irineu, Oldrini Barbara Botelho. Chave para identificação das famílias e gêneros das larvas conhecidas de Odonata do Brasil: comentários e registros bibliográficos (Insecta, Odonata) Publicações Avulsas do Museu Nacional; Rio de Janeiro: 2004. 44 [Google Scholar]
  20. Delariva Rosilene Luciana, Neves Mayara Pereira, Larentis Crislei, Kliemann Bruna Caroline Kotz, Baldasso Mara Cristina, Wolff Luciano Lazzarini. Fish fauna in forested and rural streams from an ecoregion of high endemism, lower Iguaçu River basin, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 2018;18(3):1–12. doi: 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Derisio José Carlos. Introdução ao Controle de Poluição Ambiental. 5ª edição. Oficina de textos; São Paulo: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dias Lucimar Gomes, Salles Frederico Falcão, Francischetti Cesar Nascimento, Ferreira Paulo Sérgio Fiuza. Key to the genera of Ephemerelloidea (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 2006;6(1):1–6. doi: 10.1590/s1676-06032006000100015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edmunds George F, Jensen Steven L, Berner Lewis. The mayflies of north and central America. University of Minnesota Press; Minneapolis: 1976. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferreira-Peruquetti Patrícia Santos, Marco-Jr Paulo. Efeito da alteração ambiental sobre comunidades de Odonata em riachos de Mata Atlântica de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 2002;19(2):317–327. doi: 10.1590/s0101-81752002000200002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fidelis Luana, Nessimian Jorge Luiz, Hamada Neusa. Distribuição espacial de insetos aquáticos em igarapés de pequena ordem na Amazônia Central. Acta Amazonica. 2008;38(1):127–134. doi: 10.1590/s0044-59672008000100014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Goulart Michael Dave, Callisto Marcos. Bioindicadores de qualidade da água como ferramenta em estudos de impacto ambiental. http://labs.icb.ufmg.br/benthos/index_arquivos/pdfs_pagina/Goulart & Callisto-Fapam.pdf Revista Fapam. 2003;2(1):156–164. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamada Neusa, Silva Jeferson Oliveira. Ordem Plecoptera. In: Hamada Neusa, Nessimian Jorge Luiz, Querino Ranyse Barbosa., editors. Insetos aquáticos na Amazônia brasileira: taxonomia, biologia e ecologia. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia; Manaus: 2014. 723. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hanson Paul, Springer Monika, Ramirez Alonso. Introducción a los grupos de macroinvertebrados acuáticos. Revista de Biología Tropical. 2010;58:3–37. doi: 10.15517/rbt.v58i4.20080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Henriques-Oliveira Ana Lucia, Nessimian Jorge Luiz, Baptista Darcílio Fernandes. Diversity and composition of Trichoptera (Insecta) larvae assemblages in streams with different environmental conditions at Serra da Bocaina, Southeastern Brazil. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 2015;27(4):394–410. doi: 10.1590/s2179-975x3215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hepp Luiz Ubiratan, Milesi Silvia Vendrusculo, Biasi Cristiane, Restello Rozane Maria. Effects of agricultural and urban impacts on macroinvertebrates assemblages in streams (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) Zoologia (Curitiba) 2010;27(1):106–113. doi: 10.1590/s1984-46702010000100016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. ICMBio Plano de manejo do Parque Nacional do Iguaçu. https://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/plano-de-manejo/plano_de_manejo_do_parna_do_iguacu_fevereiro_2018.pdf. [2020-07-02T00:00:00+03:00];
  32. Joly Carlos Alfredo, Aidar Marcos Pereira Marinho, Klink Carlos Augusto, McGrath David Gibbs, Moreira AG, Moutinho P, Nepstad Daniel Curtis, Oliveira AA, Pott A, Rodal Maria Jesus Nogueira, Sampaio Everardo Valadares Sá Barreto. Evolution of the Brazilian phytogeography classification systems: implications for biodiversity conservation. https://acervo.socioambiental.org/sites/default/files/documents/L4D00043.pdf Ciência e Cultura. 1999;51(5-6):331–348. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaller Michael D., Kelso William E. Association of macroinvertebrate assemblages with dissolved oxygen concentration and wood surface area in selected subtropical streams of the southeastern USA. Aquatic Ecology. 2006;41(1):95–110. doi: 10.1007/s10452-006-9046-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kikuchi Regina Mayumi, Uieda Virgínia Sanches. Composição e distribuição dos macroinvertebrados em diferentes substratos de fundo de um riacho no Município de Itatinga, São Paulo, Brasil. Entomología y Vectores. 2005;12(2):193–231. doi: 10.1590/s0328-03812005000200006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lima Walter Paula. Hidrologia florestal aplicada ao manejo de bacias hidrográficas. Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz” Departamento de Ciências Florestais; Piracicaba: 2008. 245. [Google Scholar]
  36. Linares Marden Seabra, Faccioli Gregorio Guirado, Freitas Liriane Monte. Benthic macroinvertebrate community structure and seasonal variation in a neotropical stream in the State of Alagoas, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 2013;13(3):50–54. doi: 10.1590/s1676-06032013000300006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Marchese Christian. Biodiversity hotspots: A shortcut for a more complicated concept. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2015;3:297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.12.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moretto YARA, Pujarra SAMAILA. Inventário da comunidade de macroinvertebrados bentônicos em rios e riachos do Parque Nacional do Iguaçu, Brasil. https://revistas.unila.edu.br/relea/article/view/576/1301 Revista Latino-Americana de Estudos Avançados. 2017;1(2):145–157. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mugnai Ricardo, Nessimian Jorge Luiz, Baptista Darcilio Fernandes. Manual de Identificação de Macroinvertebrados Aquáticos do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. 1º edição. Technical Books Editora; Rio de Janeiro: 2010. 174. [Google Scholar]
  40. Neves Mayara Pereira, Delariva Rosilene Luciana, Wolff Luciano Lazzarini. Diet and ecomorphological relationships of an endemic, species-poor fish assemblage in a stream in the Iguaçu National Park. Neotropical Ichthyology. 2015;13(1):245–254. doi: 10.1590/1982-0224-20140124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Passos Maria Inês Silva, Nessimian Jorge Luiz, Ferreira-Jr Nelson. Chaves para identificação dos gêneros de Elmidae (Coleoptera) ocorrentes no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 2007;51(1):42–53. doi: 10.1590/s0085-56262007000100008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pes Ana Maria Oliveira, Hamada Neusa, Nessimian Jorge Luiz. Chaves de identificação de larvas para famílias e gêneros de Trichoptera (Insecta) da Amazônia Central, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 2005;49(2):181–204. doi: 10.1590/s0085-56262005000200002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Restello Rozane Maria, Battistoni Daiane, Sobczak Jesse Renan, Valduga Alice Teresa, Zackrzevski Sônia Beatriz Balvedi, Zanin Elisabete Maria, Decian Vanderlei Secretti, Hepp Luiz Ubiratan. Effectiveness of protected areas for the conservation of aquatic invertebrates: a study-case in southern Brazil. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 2020;32 doi: 10.1590/s2179-975x9416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rieradevall Maria, Brooks Stephen J. An identification guide to subfossil Tanypodinae larvae (Insecta: Diptera: Chironomidae) based on cephalic setation. Journal of Paleolimnology. 2001;25(1):81–99. doi: 10.1023/a:1008185517959. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosenberg David M, Resh Vicent H. Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall; New York: 1993. 488. [Google Scholar]
  46. Salles Frederico Falcão, Da-Silva Elidiomar Ribeiro, Serrão José Eduardo, Francischetti Cesar Nascimento. Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) na região sudeste do Brasil: novos registros e chave para os gêneros no estágio ninfal. Neotropical Entomology. 2004;33(6):725–735. doi: 10.1590/s1519-566x2004000600010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sanseverino Angela Manzolillo, Nessimian Jorge Luiz. Larvas de Chironomidae (Diptera) em depósitos de folhiço submerso em um riacho de primeira ordem da Mata Atlântica (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 2008;52(1):95–104. doi: 10.1590/s0085-56262008000100017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Santos Jhenifer Simões, Wolff Luciano Lazzarini, Baldan Lucíola Thais, Guimarães Ana Tereza Bittencourt. Protocol for sampling and preparing samples of benthic macroinvertebrates. [2020-07-02T00:00:00+03:00]; doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.bfqyjmxw. [DOI]
  49. Saunders Debra L, Meeuwig Jessica J, Vincent Amanda CJ. Freshwater protected areas: Strategies for conservation. Conservation Biology. 2002;16(1):30–41. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.99562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shimano Yulie, Salles Frederico Falcao, Faria Luiz Roberto Ribeiro, Cabette Helena Soares Ramos, Nogueira Denis Silva. Distribuição espacial das guildas tróficas e estruturação da comunidade de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) em córregos do Cerrado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 2012;102(2):187–196. doi: 10.1590/s0073-47212012000200011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Siegloch Ana Emilia, Froehlich Claudio Gilberto, Kotzian Carla Bender. Composition and diversity of Ephemeroptera (Insecta) nymph communities in the middle section of the Jacuí River and some tributaries, southern Brazil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 2008;98(4):425–432. doi: 10.1590/s0073-47212008000400002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Spies Marcia Regina, Froehlich Claudio Gilberto. Inventory of caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) of the Campos do Jordão State Park, São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 2009;9(4):211–218. doi: 10.1590/s1676-06032009000400021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Statsoft . Tulsa-USA; 2004. Statistica (data analysis software system) Version 7. [Google Scholar]
  54. Suga Cristiane Midori, Tanaka Marcel Okamoto. Influence of a forest remnant on macroinvertebrate communities in a degraded tropical stream. Hydrobiologia. 2012;703(1):203–213. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1360-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Suski Cory David, Cooke Steven J. Conservation of aquatic resources through the use of freshwater protected areas: Opportunities and challenges. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2006;16(7):2015–2029. doi: 10.1007/s10531-006-9060-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Trivinho-Strixino Susana, Strixino G. Larvas de Chironomidae (Diptera) do Estado de SãoPaulo: guia de identificação e diagnose dos gêneros. PPG-ERN; São Carlos: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  57. UNESCO World Heritage Committee. Report: 36th Session; Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage; Saint-Petersburg. 24 June - 6 July 2012; 2012. 217. [Google Scholar]
  58. UNESCO State of Conservation Report – 44 COM, Iguaçu National Park – BRAZIL (1986, Ref. 355); World Heritage Centre; 2019. 624. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wright Ian A., Ryan Michelle M. Impact of mining and industrial pollution on stream macroinvertebrates: importance of taxonomic resolution, water geochemistry and EPT indices for impact detection. Hydrobiologia. 2016;772(1):103–115. doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-2644-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. WWF-Brazil Guia de fauna do Parque Nacional do Iguaçu. https://www.wwf.org.br/?40282/Guia-de-Fauna-do-Parque-Nacional-do-Iguau. [2020-03-26T00:00:00+02:00];

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES