Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1977 Jul;34(1):69–79. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.1.69-79.1977

Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters.

R S Tobin, B J Dutka
PMCID: PMC242591  PMID: 329763

Abstract

A comparative study was made of nine commonly used membrane filters from five manufacturers, all recommended for enumeration of coliform bacteria. Bacterial recoveries and flow rates were examined from three types of water and were found to correlate with the surface pore structure determined by scanning electron microscopy. The sorption of metals was also determined. The results of these studies indicate that the five best membranes for fecal coliform recovery could be placed in two groups: Millipore HC and Gelman, followed by Johns-Manville SG and AG and Sartorius 13806.

Full text

PDF
69

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brodsky M. H., Schiemann D. A. Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Nov;30(5):727–730. doi: 10.1128/am.30.5.727-730.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dutka B. J., Jackson M. J., Bell J. B. Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):474–480. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.474-480.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green B. L., Clausen E., Litsky W. Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):697–699. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.697-699.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lin S. D. Evaluation of millipore HA and HC membrane filters for the enumeration of indicator bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Aug;32(2):300–302. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.2.300-302.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Presswood W. G., Brown L. R. Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):332–336. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.332-336.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schaeffer D. J., Long M. C., Janardan K. G. Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct;28(4):605–607. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.605-607.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sladek K. J., Suslavich R. V., Sohn B. I., Dawson F. W. Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):685–691. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.685-691.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Standridge J. H. Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976 Feb;31(2):316–319. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.2.316-319.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES