Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative motor disorder which is largely sporadic; however, some familial forms have been identified. Genetic PD can be inherited by autosomal, dominant or recessive mutations. While the dominant mutations mirror the prototype of PD with adult-onset and L-dopa-responsive cases, autosomal recessive PD (ARPD), exhibit atypical phenotypes with additional clinical manifestations. Young-onset of PD is also very common with mutations in recessive gene loci. The main genes associated with ARPD are Parkin, PINK1, DJ-1, ATP13A2, FBXO7 and PLA2G6. Calcium dyshomeostasis is a mainstay in all types of PD, be it genetic or sporadic. Intriguingly, calcium imbalances manifesting as altered Store Operated Calcium Entry (SOCE) is suggested in PLA2G6-linked PARK 14 PD. The common pathways underlying ARPD pathology, including mitochondrial abnormalities and autophagic dysfunction can be investigated ex vivo using the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology and are discussed here. PD pathophysiology is not faithfully replicated by animal models, and therefore, nigral dopaminergic neurons generated from iPSC serve as improved human cellular models. With no cure till date and treatments aiming at symptomatic relief, these in vitro models derived through midbrain floor plate induction provide a platform to understand the molecular and biochemical pathways underlying PD etiology in a patient-specific manner.
Keywords: Dopaminergic neurons, Lewy bodies, Calcium, SOCE, PARK-14, Phospholipase A2, Mitophagy, Cellular reprogramming, Autophagic-lysosomal pathwayAbbreviations
1. Introduction
Parkinson disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor symptoms such as resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, postural instability, stooped posture and freezing, as well as non-motor symptoms including cognitive and behavioural symptoms, sleep disorders, autonomic dysfunction, sensory symptoms and fatigue 1–5. The pathological hallmark of PD is the progressive loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and the subsequent loss of dopamine inputs to forebrain striatal structures along with the appearance of protein inclusions called Lewy bodies (LB) composed of α-synuclein fibrils 2,3 PD is classified into two genetic subtypes including monogenic familial forms with Mendelian inheritance and sporadic forms with no underlying genetic factors 6. The sporadic forms of PD are highly prevalent whereas familial PD accounts to only 5-10% of the reported cases. Monogenic familial forms of PD are rare, caused by highly penetrant disease causing mutations. Parkinsonism caused by dominant mutations including alpha-synuclein (SNCA), leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), vacuolar protein sorting 35 (VPS35) and the like are largely similar to the common, late-onset sporadic PD 7,8. Autosomal recessive PD (ARPD) results from mutations in different loci which have clinical signs typical of PD or can exhibit a wide range of other complex symptoms. The common pathways underlying ARPD are mitochondrial quality control, protein degradation processes, and oxidative stress responses among others 9,10.
The current knowledge of PD is mostly from postmortem studies and animal models. While the former represent only the end-stage of the disease, the latter fail to reflect human disease pathology due to interspecies differences. In this context, human pluripotent stem cells (both embryonic stem cells, ESC and induced pluripotent stem cells, iPSC) are an excellent source of cells for differentiation to DA neurons in vitro. ‘Disease modelling in a dish’ by recapitulating the disease phenotypes in defined cell populations would make it possible to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms of PD along with providing a high-throughput drug screening platform 11–13.
2. Autosomal recessive parkinsonism
The hereditary forms of parkinsonism which are transmitted in an autosomal recessive fashion are given in Table 1. Mutations have been identified most commonly in three genes in several ethnic groups spanning different geographical locations- parkin (PRKN, PARK2), PTEN induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1, PARK6), and Parkinson protein 7 (DJ-1, PARK7). Point mutations, large genomic rearrangements, leading to deletions or multiplications presenting as homozygous or compound heterozygous variations are reported, particularly for parkin 14 Recessive mutations in several genes, including ATPase type 13A2 (ATP13A2, PARK9), phospholipase A2, group VI (PLA2G6, PARK14), F-box only protein 7 (FBXO7, PARK15), spatacsin (SPG11), and DNA polymerase gamma (POLG), cause young or juvenile onset-PD. These present with other clinical manifestations like dystonia, dementia and other disturbances 8. DNAJ subfamily C member 6 (DNAJC6, PARK19), synaptojanin-1 (SYNJ1, PARK 20), vacuolar protein sorting 13C (VPS13C, PARK23) are also reported to have mutations causing autosomal recessive PD 6.
Table 1. Genes associated with autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease (ARPD).
Causal genes for autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease (ARPD). Genes mapped to different PARK loci and associated with ARPD are listed together with the involved protein. Rarely, mutations in spatacsin (SPG11), and DNA polymerase gamma (POLG), cause autosomal recessive parkinsonism with juvenile onset, mostly with atypical features.
Locus | Gene | Protein |
---|---|---|
PARK2 | Parkin | E3 ubiquitin-ligase |
PARK6 | Pink1 | phosphatase and tensin homolog induced putative kinase1 |
PARK7 | DJ-1 | Parkinson protein 7, oncogene DJ-1 |
PARK9 | ATP13A2 | lysosomal P5-type ATPase |
PARK14 | PLA2G6 | phospholipase A2, group VI |
PARK15 | FBXO7 | F-box only protein 7 |
PARK19 | DNAJC6 | putative tyrosine-protein phosphatase auxilin |
PARK20 | SYNJ1 | synaptojanin-1 |
PARK23 | VPS13C | vacuolar protein sorting 13C |
SPG11 | spatacsin | |
POLG | DNA polymerase gamma |
2.1. PLA2G6 (PARK14)
Phospholipase A2 group 6 (PLA2G6, iPLA2β) gene encodes a calcium-independent group 6 phospholipase A2 enzyme, which hydrolyzes the sn-2 ester bond of the membrane glycerophospholipids to produce free fatty acids and lysophospholipids 15. Various mutations in this gene have been discovered in patients with neurodegenerative disorders such as infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy (INAD), atypical neuroaxonal dystrophy (ANAD), adult-onset dystonia-parkinsonism (DP) and autosomal recessive early-onset parkinsonism (AREP), together known as PLA2G6-asscociated neurodegeneration, PLAN 16. PLAN can be classified as neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation II (NBIA II), however a wide range of clinical variability is exhibited in these phenotypes with most PD cases devoid of brain iron deposition or cortical atrophy 17. iPLA2β protein contains an N-terminal domain, Ankyrin repeats and catalytic domains (Figure 1). iPLA2β is predominantly localized in the cytosol, but can translocate to the Golgi, ER, mitochondria, and nucleus under stimulation 18–21. Two distinct 85 kDa (VIA-1) and 88 kDa (VIA-2) human iPLA2β isoforms have been discovered along with many N-terminal truncated forms due to proteolytic cleavage and alternate splicing 21. It is highly expressed in the human brain including SNpc (http://www.proteinatlas.org). The PLA2G6 gene mutations was associated with parkinsonism almost a decade ago, with R741Q and R747W being the first to be reported in adult-onset levodopa-responsive dystonia-parkinsonism 22–24. p.R741Q has also been indicated in early-onset PD without dystonia 25. Though PD-associated mutations in this gene are mostly homozygous, some of them are rare and specific to geographic areas 26–29 while others are compound heterozygous 30–32. The mutations that are pathogenic and causal for PD in PLA2G6 are detailed in Table 2.
Figure 1. Structure of PLA2G6 (iPLA2β) protein.
The full length protein is shown with seven ankyrin repeats (pink circles), a proline-rich motif (blue box), a glycine-rich nucleotide binding motif (magenta), a lipase motif (orange with the active site highlighted), and a proposed C-terminal calcium-dependent calmodulin binding domain (purple). Numbers indicate amino acids.
Table 2. List of PD-associated pathogenic mutations in PLA2G6 (PARK14) gene loci.
Mutations in PLA2G6 gene that cause Parkinson’s disease. Mutations in the PLA2G6 gene that are pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) and cause Parkinson’s disease are documented.
Mutation | Protein change |
---|---|
c.109 C >T | p.arg37-to-X (R37X) |
c.216C > A | p.phe72-to-leu (F72L) |
c.238 G > A | p.ala80-to-thr (A80T) |
c.991G > T | p.asp331-to-tyr (D331Y) |
c.1077 G > A | p.met358-llefsX6 |
c.1354C > T | p.gln452-to-X (Q452X) |
c.1495G > A | p.ala499-to-thr (A499T) |
c.1715C > T | p.thr572-to-ile (T572I) |
c.1791delC | p.his597-fx69 |
c.1894C > T | p. arg632-to-trp (R632W) |
c.1904G > A | p.arg635-to-gln (R635Q) |
c.1976A > G | p.asn659-to-ser (N659S) |
c.2215G > C | p.asp739-to-his (D739H) |
c.2222G > A | p.argR741-to-gln (R741Q) |
c.2239C > T | p.arg747-to-trp (R747W) |
Widespread LB pathology is seen with PLA2G6-linked PD 33,34. The loss of PLA2G6 in Drosophila results in impaired retromer function, ceramide accumulation, and leads to lysosomal dysfunction, leading to age-dependent loss of neuronal activity 35. Dysfunction of mitochondria and increased lipid peroxidation have also been reported in PLA2G6-deficient Drosophila mimicking the human fibroblasts with R747W mutation 19. Increased sensitivity to oxidative stress, progressive neurodegeneration and a severely reduced lifespan and impaired motor co-ordination is seen in PLA2G6-knockout flies 36. In yet another fly model, the loss of PLA2G6 leads to shortening of phospholipid acyl chains, resulting in ER stress and impaired neuronal activity as well as formation of α-synuclein fibrils, demonstrating that phospholipid remodeling by PLA2G6 is essential for DA neuron survival and function 37. Similarly, a rodent knockin model of D331Y PLA2G6 mutation exhibited early degeneration of SNpc DA possibly via mitochondrial and ER stress, impaired autophagic mechanisms and gene expression changes 38.
Elevated levels of both α-synuclein and phosphorylated α-synuclein are seen in PLA2G6 knockout mice models, facilitating the formation of LB and eventually death of affected DA neurons 39. In an in vitro study examining the catalytic activity of PLA2G6 proteins, recombinant proteins containing the three mutations associated with dystonia-parkinsonism (R632W, R741Q, and R747W) did not show any altered catalytic activity whereas the mutations associated with INAD led to a significant loss of enzyme activity 40. In addition, PLA2G6-PD mutants of SHSY5Y, a neuroblastoma cell line, failed to prevent rotenone-induced death of dopaminergic cells 41. PLA2G6-PD does not present with a typical clinical scenario and continues to evolve with a wide phenotypic spectrum. It is safe to infer that the PD-relevant mutations do not significantly alter the catalytic activity of the enzyme, but induce damage through parallel mechanisms like oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction or even compromised lipid remodeling.
2.1.1. PLA2G6 and Store-operated calcium entry (SOCE)
Store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) is an arm of calcium signaling activated by depletion of ER stores that triggers influx of calcium across the PM brought about by the calcium sensor STIM and the PM pore channel Orai 42–44. Interestingly in a genetic screening of Drosophila, not only STIM1 and Orai1, but also a fly orthologue of PLA2G6 encoded by the CG6718 gene, were identified as SOCE activators 44. Many groups have from this time identified PLA2G6 as an endogenous activator of SOCE 45–48. The physiological relevance of neuronal SOCE is disputed 49and its role in DA neurons, particularly, is not known. In PD, abnormal calcium homeostasis triggers a cascade of downstream events that eventually leads to cell death 50. Interestingly, primary skin fibroblasts from idiopathic and PLA2G6-PD (R747W) patients revealed a significant deficit in endogenous SOCE and similarly, MEFs from the exon2-knockout mice exhibited deficient store-operated PLA2G6-dependent calcium signaling 51. This was also mirrored in the iPSC-derived DA neurons along with low ER calcium levels and deficient autophagic flux. The knockout mice also showed age-dependent loss of DA neurons. This study for the first time arrived at a causal relationship between PLA2G6-dependent SOCE, depleted stores, dysfunctional autophagy in DA neurons and a PD-like phenotype 51. Recently, in a patient derived (D331Y) DA neuron model, imbalance of calcium homeostasis, markedly deficient SOCE, increase of UPR proteins, mitochondrial dysfunction, increase of ROS, and apoptosis was reported. Interestingly the UPR modulator, azoramide rescued the phenotype of the mutant DA neurons, possibly via CREB signaling 52. These recent developments have opened new exciting areas to study the significant contributions of PLA2G6 and SOCE in PD, and may involve new undiscovered molecules providing a yet unexplored arena for PD-drug discovery.
2.2. Parkin, PINK1 and DJ-1
The E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin (PARK2) and the serine/threonine kinase PINK1 (phosphatase and tensin homolog induced putative kinase1, PARK6), act together in a mitochondrial quality control pathway and promote the selective autophagy of depolarized mitochondria (mitophagy)53. PINK1 levels are low in healthy cells as it is continually cleaved inside the mitochondria in a sequential manner by proteases 54. The import of PINK1 into mitochondria is stopped when the organelle loses its inner membrane electrochemical gradient (depolarization), which leads to the stabilization of the protein on the mitochondrial outer membrane 55. This accumulation of PINK1 kinase on the mitochondria triggers parkin recruitment and activation resulting in ubiquitination of various outer mitochondrial membrane proteins 56,57. The damaged mitochondria are eventually eliminated by autophagy. Pathogenic PD-associated mutations in either Parkin or PINK1 causes accumulation of impaired mitochondria, increased ROS and neuronal cell death 58. More than 100 different Parkin mutations have been reported from PD patients, including deletions, insertions, multiplications, missense and truncating mutations and over 40 point mutations and rarely, large deletions, have been detected in PINK1 59. Clinically both cause young onset PD and show responsiveness to levodopa. The phenotype associated with the oncogene DJ-1 mutations has been studied in a smaller number of patients but it is overall indistinguishable from that of the patients with PINK1 or Parkin mutations 60. DJ-1 is thought to be involved in the regulation of the integrity and calcium cross-talk between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria and pathogenic mutations lead to impaired ER-mitochondria association in PD 61.
2.3. ATP13A2, FBXO7, SPG11 and POLG
Mutations in ATP13A2, FBXO7, spatacsin and POLG cause juvenile-onset ARPD along with PLA2G6 8. Mutations in ATP13A2 or PARK9, were first identified in 2006 in a Chilean family and are associated with a juvenile-onset, levodopa-responsive type of Parkinsonism called Kufor-Rakeb syndrome (KRS). KRS involves pyramidal degeneration, supranuclear palsy, and cognitive impairment 62. The ATP13A2 gene encodes a large lysosomal protein, belonging to the P5-type ATPase family of transmembrane active transporters. Its substrate specificity remains unknown. It is suggested that ATP13A2 recruits HDAC6 to lysosomes to promote autophagosome-lysosome fusion and maintain normal autophagic flux 63. This, in turn is required for preventing α-synuclein aggregation in neurons. FBXO7, in turn is an adaptor protein in SCFFBXO7 ubiquitin E3 ligase complex that mediates degradative or non-degradative ubiquitination of substrates. FBXO7 mutantions aggravate protein aggregation in mitochondria and inhibit mitophagy 64. Parkin- and FBXO7-linked PD have overlapping pathophysiologic mechanisms and clinical features. Wild type FBXO7, but not PD-linked FBXO7 mutants has been shown to rescue DA neuron degeneration in Parkin null Drosophila 65. Loss of activity of FBXO7 in seen in patients with PARK 15-PD and is therefore crucial for the maintenance of neurons 66. SPG11 or spatacsin mutations present with bilateral symmetric parkinsonism at an early age with rapid deterioration and development of spastic paraplegia and thinning of the corpus callosum on MRI, typical of spastic paraplegia 11 67,68. An involvement of POLG, the mitochondrial DNA polymerase that is responsible for replication of the mitochondrial genome is considered in early onset-PD especially in the presence of additional symptoms, such as ophthalmoparesis, non-vascular white matter lesions and psychiatric comorbidity 69. A role of mitochondrial DNA defects in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative parkinsonism with POLG mutations is speculated 70.
3. Common pathways in ARPD
There are many converging features seen at the molecular and clinical level in ARPD that are discussed in the following section. Understanding these causal molecular mechanisms is crucial to identify common targets and devise therapeutic approaches. However, some fundamental underlying processes still remain unclear. The contributions of the intracellular organelle ER in ARPD pathology via the calcium signaling pathway, SOCE is poorly understood. The mitochondrion, which is the star player in PD pathogenesis, regulates SOCE activity possibly via sub-plasmalemmal calcium buffering, the generation of mediators, local ATP modulation and regulation of STIM171. In turn, SOCE-derived calcium significantly affects mitochondrial metabolism. Hence, the communication between SOCE and mitochondria is hypothesized to be interdependent and complex leading to fine-tuning of both SOCE and mitochondrial function72. Though PD-relevant mitochondrial processes are studied extensively, SOCE and its role in PD is largely unexplored. The microbiota-gut-brain axis and its imbalance by alterations in the human microbiome also represent a risk factor for PD73. Such pathways that are not well-proven are omitted from this section, for the ease of understanding.
3.1. Mitochondrial pathways
The most compelling evidence for loss of mitochondrial fidelity comes from the genes PINK1 and Parkin. As mentioned earlier, PINK1 accumulates on the outer membrane of damaged mitochondria and activates Parkin’s E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Parkin recruited to the damaged mitochondrion ubiquitinates the outer mitochondrial membrane proteins to trigger selective autophagy. In the late 1970’s when accidental exposure to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) was found to cause PD and neurodegeneration, the first causal mechanism speculated was mitochondrial dysfunction 74. A specific defect of Complex I activity is also seen in the substantia nigra of patients with PD 75. We now understand that the pathways included in mitochondrial quality control system are fission/fusion, mitochondrial transport, mitophagy, and mitochondrial biogenesis 9. The precise mechanisms by which Parkin and PINK1 regulate fission and fusion is debated but studies from Drosophila and mammalian culture systems, though contradictory, indicates unbalanced mitochondrial fission and fusion in PINK1 mutants 9,76–79. DJ-1 80 and ATP13A2 81 mutants also show fragmented mitochondria. The combined effects of Parkin and PGC-1α in the maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis in dopaminergic neurons is demonstrated 82. PINK1 is also involved in mitochondrial motility along axons and dendrites of neurons. PINK1 interacts with Miro, a component of the motor/adaptor complex binding mitochondria to microtubules and allowing their movement to and from cellular processes 83. Miro is phosphorylated by PINK1 and ubiquitinated by parkin, leading to its degradation and halting mitochondrial transport promoting clearance of damaged mitochondria 84. Parkin/PINK1 is hence involved in mitochondrial trafficking 9,85.
The clearance of damaged mitochondria or mitophagy is a pathway common to mostly all ARPD-related genes. The role of Pink1-Parkin in mitophagy is well-established 86,87. Fbxo7 is also shown to induce mitophagy in response to mitochondrial depolarisation in a common pathway with Parkin and PINK1, and PD-associated mutations interfere in this mechanism 88. Parkin 89 and PINK1 90 is also linked to mitochondrial biogenesis therefore probably being a part of mitochondrial transcription/replication.
3.2. Autophagy-lysosomal pathways
In addition to impaired mitophagy, protein degradation pathways, especially the autophagy-lysosomal pathway are affected in PD. ATP13A2 is suggested as a regulator of the autophagy-lysosome pathway. ATP13A2 acts in concert with another PD-protein SYT11 and its loss of function results in dysfunctional autophagy-lysosomal pathway as seen in PD 91. α-synuclein-independent neurotoxicity due to endolysosomal dysfunction has also been demonstrated in ATP13A2 null mice 92 Parkin knockout neurons too show perturbed lysosomal morphology and mitochondrial stress 93. DJ-1 is associated to chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) and its deficiency aggravates α-synuclein aggregation by inhibiting CMA activation 94 Loss of DJ-1 could also lead to impaired autophagy and accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria 95. Autophagic defects are a mainstay in PLA2G6-PD. Genetic or molecular impairment of PLA2G6-dependent calcium signalling is a trigger for autophagic dysfunction, progressive loss of DA neurons and age-dependent L-DOPA-sensitive motor dysfunction in a mouse knockout model 51.
3.3. Cell death and oxidative stress
Oxidative stress and apoptosis are frequently involved in ARPD pathogenesis. ROS accumulation plays a key role in the initiation and acceleration of cell death compromising neuronal function and structural integrity 96. The protein products of Parkin, PINK1 and DJ-1 are associated with disrupted oxidoreductive homeostasis in DA neurons. Impaired cell survival in part due to defective oxidative stress response is implicated in PARK2 knockout neurons 97. Further transgenic overexpression of the parkin substrate, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex interacting multifunctional protein-2 (AIMP2) leads to a selective, age-dependent progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons via activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) 98. Similarly PINK1 is also shown to exert a neuroprotective effect by inhibiting ROS formation and maintaining normal mitochondrial membrane potential and morphology in cultured SN dopaminergic neurons 99. The profiles of oxidative damage in the whole brain and neurochemical metabolites in the striatum of PINK1 knockout rats at different ages and genders was studied and oxidative damage revealed as a crucial factor for PD 100. Loss of PINK1 inhibits the mitochondrial Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger (NCLX), resulting in impaired mitochondrial calcium extrusion which was, however, fully rescued by activation of the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway 101. DJ-1 also has a role in cell death and combating oxidative stress. It suppresses PTEN activity, thereby promoting cell growth and promoting cellular defense against ROS through PI3K/Akt signaling 102. Reduced anti-oxidative stress mechanisms have been reported in PD patients with mutant DJ-1 protein 103. It is also described that Daxx, the death-associated protein, translocated to the cytosol selectively in SNpc neurons due to MPTP mediated downregulation of DJ-1 after treatment with the neurotoxin in mouse models 104. DJ-1 is also hypothesized to regulate the expression of UCP4 by oxidation and partially via NF-κB pathway in its protective response to oxidative stress 105. DJ-1, particularly in its oxidized form is documented as a biomarker for many diseases including PD. DJ-1 may also work by increasing microRNA-221expression through the MAPK/ERK pathway, subsequently leading to repression of apoptotic molecules 106. Additionally cell permeable Tat-DJ-1 protein exerts neuroprotective effects in cell lines and mouse models of PD 107. Data from the field indicate that DJ-1 may become activated in the presence of ROS or oxidative stress, but also as part of physiological receptor-mediated signal transduction and acts as a transcriptional regulator of antioxidative gene batteries 108. ATP13A2, on the contrary is thought to protect against hypoxia-induced oxidative stress 109. A recent study revealed a conserved neuroprotective mechanism that counters mitochondrial oxidative stress via ATP13A2-mediated lysosomal spermine export 110. PLA2G6 protein is also indicated in oxidative stress-related pathways 19,52
4. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) in Parkinson’s disease research
Yamanaka’s discovery in 2007 where key transcriptional factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc) were used to reprogram adult cells to a de-differentiated, poised cell type called Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) revolutionized the field of human disease modeling 111. Reprogrammed iPSCs are similar to embryonic stem cells or ESCs, are pluripotent and can differentiate to multiple lineages. iPSCs when derived from a PD patient has the patient’s complete genetic background and provides a valuable platform to study the impact of genetic mutations. Within a year of the discovery of iPSCs, PD patient-derived iPSCs 112 and DA neuron differentiation from iPSCs were reported 113. iPSC models have successively been established from various sporadic and familial PD patients. To date, iPSCs are the most robust cellular system to understand PD and generate disease-relevant cell types for PD 114
iPSC studies typically involve few participants and random selection of cases and controls which results in heterogeneous models in vitro. Consequently, a large sample size is required to increase statistical power and sample sizes of 10-30 individuals per iPSC study may be required to achieve a statistical power of 80% 115,116. These are, in turn, labor-intensive and expensive; hence it is unlikely that these requirements are met. A smaller number may be used if clinically and genotypically homogeneous subjects are used to reduce the variance in the cellular phenotypes. Hence a preponderance of familial PD is seen in these studies. A recent report elegantly summarizes a meta-analysis of 385 iPSC-derived neuronal lines modeling mutations/deletions/triplications in LRRK2, PRKN, PINK1, GBA and SNCA 116. The authors discuss the importance of using the right controls in such studies. When healthy subjects are used as controls, differences in genetic background may give rise to variance in neuronal phenotypes studies that are not caused by disease mutations. Gene editing techniques (TALEN, ZFN, CRISPR/Cas9) aids in the generation of isogenic lines that differ in only one single mutant gene and this circumvents the issue of variance due to genetic background. CRISPR/Cas9 system, an RNA-based endonuclease, is the most common and effective tool used in the iPSC model for introducing the genetic changes seen in PD, including but not limited to knockout, knockin and gene correction 117–120. Disease-causing mutations, therefore can be inserted in healthy ESC or iPSC lines or gene-correction of a single mutation can be performed in PD-lines to include comparative isogenic control lines 116.
Differentiation protocols for DA neurons mimic embryologic development in utero. Unlike cortical neurons, midbrain DA neurons are derived from the ventral floorplate of the neural tube 121. The molecular mechanisms that regulate the development of midbrain DA neurons in vivo, and how taking cues from this, one can generate in vitro human midbrain DA neurons from iPSCs is systematically reviewed previously 122. Dual-SMAD inhibition along with modulation of sonic hedgehog (SHH) and WNT signaling by CHIR99021 (GSK3β inhibitor), and addition of FGF8 is routinely used to generate midbrain floor-plate precursors 123–125. BDNF, GDNF, TGFβ3, dbcAMP, ascorbic acid, DAPT and ActivinA are used to enhance the purity and maturity of DA neurons which express the key marker TH (tyrosine hydroxylase) 126–128. A schematic and generalized diagram outlining the midbrain DA differentiation protocol from iPSCs is shown in Figure 2 (the starting population can also be ESCs). It is important to note that, irrespective of the protocols used a heterogeneous cell population is attained, with neurons, glia and NSCs. To attain a high percentage of TH+ DA neuron population, several strategies have been employed. Sorting of DA progenitors which are CD184high/CD44- 129 or CORIN+ 130 is shown to increase the TH+ DA neuron yield. CRISPR/ Cas9-based knockin of a fluorescent reporter to visually identify and purify TH+ DA neurons has also been attempted 131. A monolayer-based neural differentiation protocol was described recently that reproducibly generates ~70-80% midbrain DA neurons 132,133. A higher concentration of 300 ng/ml SHH (100-200ng/ml is used normally) in combination with a lower concentration of 0.6μM CHIR99021 (0.8 μM-3 μM is used normally) and passaging and replating in the early differentiation and patterning stages maximized the yield of midbrain DA neurons as early as day 30. This monolayer platform is amenable to imaging and functional assessments of autophagy/ mitophagy 132. In an interesting study, autophagic dysfunction and premature aging was shown by PD-patient derived NSCs 134. One of these patients had early onset-PD with a novel mutation in PLA2G6 gene. The authors hypothesize that developmental defects, and the subsequent depletion of NSC pool size could lead to lower DA neuron number and this impacts the onset and severity of the disease progression 134. Hence not only iPSC-derived DA neurons, but also the developmentally upstream NSCs could be a disease-relevant phenotype for prediction analyses and design of intervention therapies.
Figure 2. A generalized schematic protocol for differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into midbrain dopaminergic (DA) neurons.
Human iPSCs are treated with small molecules, such as GSK3β inhibitors (GSK3i) and SMAD inhibitors along with Shh/ FGF8b to induce midbrain floor plate formation and subsequent midbrain DA specification. This is done either by means of direct differentiation from iPSCs or through embryoid bodies (EBs). The DA progenitors can be sorted with a midbrain cell surface marker like CORIN to achieve higher purity of DA neurons via elimination of unwanted contaminant cells. Mature midbrain DA neurons are generated from these progenitors by addition of mentioned factors at the end of 40-70 DIV (days in vitro) in total. * indicates factors that may be used in the final differentiation step, but not compulsory. ActA, activin A; AA, ascorbic acid; BDNF, brain derived neurotrophic factor; DAPT, γ-secretase inhibitor; dbcAMP, dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate; FGF8, fibroblast growth factor 8; GDNF, glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor; Shh, sonic hedgehog; TGFβ3, transforming growth factor beta-3.
4.1. iPSC-derived two dimensional (2D) and three dimensional (3D) culture models of ARPD
Mutations in the PARK2 gene, encoding the protein parkin, have been identified as the most common cause of ARPD. Unsurprisingly the limited in vitro iPSC-derived ARPD models primarily examine the cellular pathologies of this gene. Human iPSC-derived neurons with PARK2 knockout is known to demonstrate severe mitochondrial dysfunction even in the absence of external stressors. PARK2 patient iPSC-derived neurons showed increased oxidative stress, higher α-synuclein accumulation and enhanced activity of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway 135. Interestingly iPSC-derived neurons, but not fibroblasts or iPSCs, exhibited abnormal mitochondrial morphology and impaired mitochondrial homeostasis in their study. In a similar study, the loss of parkin significantly increased the spontaneous DA release independent of extracellular calcium and showed decreased dopamine uptake by reducing the total amount of correctly folded DAT along with DA-dependent oxidative stress. All these phenotypes could be rescued by overexpression of parkin, but not its PD-linked T240R mutant or GFP 136. Mitochondrial dysfunction, elevated α-synuclein, synaptic dysfunction, DA accumulation, and increased oxidative stress and ROS has been reported in PARK2 and PINK1 patient-derived neurons in a floor-plate-based but not a neural-rosette-based directed differentiation strategy 137. Impairment of mitophagy via formation of S-nitrosylated PINK1 (SNO-PINKI) has also been shown in iPSC-derived parkin mutant neurons 138. In a recent study, PARK2 knockout neurons from isogenic lines exhibited lysosomal impairments and autophagic perturbations, suggesting an impairment of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway in parkin-deficient cells 93. The same group had earlier shown disturbances in oxidative stress defense, mitochondrial respiration and morphology, cell cycle control, and cell viability of parkin deficient neurons 97.
Midbrain-specific 3D cultures are at present a powerful tool for modeling PD in vitro. The use of microwells by Tieng et al was the very first attempt in this direction to generate embryoid bodies, which were then placed on an orbital shaker before being seeded and grown at air-liquid interface 139. DA progenitor cells expressed FOXA2 and LMX1A as well as TH within a short span of 3 weeks. Subsequently a number of reports have been published for midbrain organoids with neuromelanin expression seen in long-term cultures 127,140–143. However PD modeling with midbrain organoids is largely focused on dominant mutations like LRRK2 128,140, SNCA 144and also an only report on sporadic PD 145. A very recent study used CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to develop isogenic loss-of-function 3D models of early-onset autosomal recessive PD (PARKIN-/-, DJ-1, and ATP13A2) to identify common pathways 146. The DA neuronal population was markedly reduced in RRKR organoids but no significant differences were observed in the other two cell lines. The death of newly differentiated TH+ neurons and higher expression of VTA marker CALB1 in the PRKN organoids were indicative of A9-like neurons being more severely affected than others. A dysregulation of the autophagy-lysosomal pathway and upregulated ROS in all cell lines and an upregulation of pathways associated with oxidative phosphorylation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and Sirtuin signaling, as well as a significant depletion of mitochondrial proteins was seen in the PRKN-/- DA neurons 146. Astrocytic pathologies in human PRKN-mutated iPSC-derived midbrain organoids were revealed for the first time, suggesting a non-autonomous cell death mechanism for dopaminergic neurons in brains of PRKN-mutated patients 147. Mutations in PINK1 have also been reported to generate reduced TH+ counts in midbrain organoids 148. Human midbrain organoid/spheroid cultures are a scalable and reproducible system to obtain DA neurons expressing markers of terminal differentiation along with neuromelanin production in a 3D environment that replicates the neuronal and glial cytoarchitecture of the human midbrain 149. They can hence provide a crucial platform to explore the molecular basis of ARPD, and also to delineate the associated cellular pathologies.
Cell replacement therapy with iPSC-based DA derivatives- The various challenges pertaining to the safety and efficacy of stem cell-based cell transplantations in PD has been elegantly reviewed and described 150. The right neural cell type for transplantation is of utmost importance. FGF8b inclusion in the differentiation protocols helps in acquisition of a caudal midbrain fate and promotes high dopaminergic graft volume, density and yield as evidenced by deep sequencing of more than 30 human ESC-derived midbrain tissues 151. Dopaminergic precursors beyond the floorplate progenitor stage but before formation of TH+ dopaminergic neurons are found to be most efficient for graft survival, integration and function in animal models 130,152 Grafting of these precursors into the putamen area, where SNpc dopaminergic neurons innervate, is an approach most likely to succeed 150. The number of cells to be transplanted is still debated. Takahashi’s group reported a minimum of 16,000 TH+ cells in a primate model to see improvements in PD score and motor function 130. The generation and implantation of iPSC-derived autologous dopaminergic progenitor cells in a patient with idiopathic PD is reported with clinical and imaging results suggesting possible benefit over a period 24 months 153. A global consortium, GForce-PD (http://www.gforce-pd.com), was set up in 2014, with major academic networks in Europe, the US, and Japan working on developing stem cell-derived neural cell therapies for PD 154. The clinical trials using human ESCs are ongoing in Australia (NCT02452723) and China (NCT03119636), with their pre-clinical data published 155,156. A clinical trial (JMA-IIA00384, UMIN000033564) in Japan to treat PD patients by using iPSC-derived DA progenitors (DAPs) was started in 2018 by Takahashi and colleagues 157,158. The results of these trials are eagerly anticipated.
5. Limitations to iPSC-based disease modeling of PD
Although iPSCs and their derivatives are currently in the forefront as PD models, there are many challenges which remain unaddressed. The most significant drawback of in vitro models is the absence of LB formation in PD iPSC-derived DA neurons. Increased levels of phosphorylated pS129 α-synuclein however has been observed 159. Additionally, the efficiency of generating DA neurons varies significantly between different methods and approximately 20–30% of the final cells are identified as DA neurons even with the most robust method such as the floor-plate induction protocol 160. Sorting of DA progenitors with markers such as CORIN seems to aid in a better yield of mature and functional DA neurons 158,161. Knocking in a reporter gene in the endogenous TH locus has been attempted to quantify the final yield of DA neurons 160 to understand the efficiency of different published protocols. However, no significant progress has been made to analyze if the DA neurons derived in vitro are similar to the SNpc neurons impacted in a PD patient. A TH+ DA neuron is necessarily not a representation of the A9 or SNpc nuclei of the brain, though GIRK2/TH positivity and low Calbindin is considered as an A9 signature 162–164 A reliable strategy would be multiplexing markers for reliable subtype identification165. Another difficulty in modelling PD with iPSCs is the induction of ‘aging’ in a culture dish. Pharmacological inhibition of telomerase by the inhibitor BIBR1532 demonstrates moderate disease-relevant phenotypes in PINK1 and PARKIN DA neurons 166. Progerin (the protein associated with premature aging) overexpression as a strategy to induce aging is also reported 167 but interpretation is complex as disease-relevant phenotypes and progerin-phenotypes are indistinguishable 168. Moreover, contrary to what is seen in PD pathology, an exogenous stressor is always necessary to observe disease phenotypes in an iPSC-DA system. In sa PD patient derived-iPSC model, DA neurons exhibit apoptosis only after exposure to stressors including hydrogen peroxidase, MG132 and 6-OHDA 169 Lastly, 2D culture systems that are normally used to differentiate DA neurons do not mimic the complex in vivo environment. 3D organoids fill this gap by representing a more physiologically relevant model system. However, the tremendous progress seen in the field is largely limited to cortical or cerebral organoids. A few midbrain spheroid or organoid culture systems are nonetheless reported 128,140–142. Results from these studies indicate that 3D midbrain cultures are definitely an improvement over 2D cultures to model PD. A recent study describes the robust generation of midbrain organoids with homogeneous distribution of midbrain DA neurons along with other neuronal subtypes as well as functional glial cells, including astrocytes and oligodendrocytes 170. Nevertheless, an overall low efficiency of generation and heterogeneity within the midbrain organoids along with its ethical considerations raises contentious questions towards a bench-to-bedside approach.
6. Conclusions
Human pluripotent stem cells, iPSCs in particular, are an invaluable tool to help us better understand PD pathology by generating functional, DA neurons with A9-like identity and also reproducing the midbrain cell composition. The improvement in differentiation protocols and 3D culturing techniques combined with genome editing technologies aids in better PD modeling studies. Additionally, these cultures exhibit key features of PD, such as α-syn accumulation, autophagic defects, oxidative stress and impairment of mitochondrial function. However, it may be advantageous to include other cell types like microglia in PD studies rather than focusing on midbrain-specific organoids to understand the disease pathology in a relevant way. The bloodbrain barrier (BBB) and its dysfunction in PD should also be emphasized. Further, the future direction in investigating PD should make use of the organ-on-chip or organoids-on-chip model with a multi-organ configuration to study different cell types and involvement of various organs in PD progression and pathology. Lastly, ARPD genes other than PRKN and PINK1, though rare may provide insights into the common molecular pathways of the monogenic disease forms and should be included in such detailed studies.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Early Career Fellowship [IA/E/18/1/504319] awarded to the author. Figures were created with BioRender. Prof. Gaiti Hasan, National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), TIFR provided critical inputs for the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- ARPD
autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease
- DA
dopaminergic
- ER
endoplasmic reticulum
- ESC
embryonic stem cell iPSC - induced pluripotent stem cell LB - Lewy bodies
- NSC
neural stem cell
- PD
Parkinson’s disease
- PM
plasma membrane
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SNpc
substantia nigra pars compacta
- SOCE
store operated calcium entry
- TH
tyrosine hydroxylase
Footnotes
Conflict of Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Bibliography
- 1.Tolosa E, Wenning G, Poewe W. The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurology. 2006 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70285-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Lau L, Breteler MMMB, de Lau LML, Breteler MMMB. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525–35. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: Clinical features and diagnosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2008 doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.131045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.O’Sullivan SS, et al. Nonmotor symptoms as presenting complaints in Parkinson’s disease: A clinicopathological study. Mov Disord. 2008 doi: 10.1002/mds.21813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kalinderi K, Bostantjopoulou S, Fidani L. The genetic background of Parkinson’s disease: current progress and future prospects. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2016 doi: 10.1111/ane.12563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karimi-Moghadam A, Charsouei S, Bell B, Jabalameli MR. Parkinson Disease from Mendelian Forms to Genetic Susceptibility: New Molecular Insights into the Neurodegeneration Process. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s10571-018-0587-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bonifati V. Genetics of Parkinson’s disease - state of the art, 2013. Park Relat Disord. 2014 doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(13)70009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bonifati V. Autosomal recessive parkinsonism. Park Relat Disord. 2012 doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(11)70004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scott L, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. Trumping neurodegeneration: Targeting common pathways regulated by autosomal recessive Parkinson’s disease genes. Experimental Neurology. 2017 doi: 10.1016/Jexpneurol.2017.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van der Merwe C, Jalali Sefid Dashti Z, Christoffels A, Loos B, Bardien S. Evidence for a common biological pathway linking three Parkinson’s disease-causing genes: Parkin, PINK1 and DJ-1. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2015 doi: 10.1111/ejn.12872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marchetto MC, Brennand KJ, Boyer LF, Gage FH. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and neurological disease modeling: Progress and promises. Hum Mol Genet. 2011 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Badger JL, Cordero-Llana O, Hartfield EM, Wade-Martins R. Parkinson’s disease in a dish - Using stem cells as a molecular tool. Neuropharmacology. 2014;76:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martínez-Morales PL, Liste I. Stem cells as in vitro model of Parkinson’s disease. Stem Cells International. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/980941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lucking CB, et al. Association between early-onset Parkinson’s disease and mutations in the parkin gene. French Parkinson’s Disease Genetics Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000 doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005253422103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pérez R, Melero R, Balboa MA, Balsinde J. Role of group VIA calcium-independent phospholipase A2 in arachidonic acid release, phospholipid fatty acid incorporation, and apoptosis in U937 cells responding to hydrogen peroxide. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:40385–40391. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402562200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gregory A, Kurian MA, Maher ER, Hogarth P, Hayflick SJ. PLA2G6-Associated Neurodegeneration. GeneReviews(®) 1993:NBK1675 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guo Y, Tang B, Guo J. PLA2G6-Associated Neurodegeneration (PLAN): Review of Clinical Phenotypes and Genotypes. Front Neurol. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Turk J, Ramanadham S. The expression and function of a group VIA calcium-independent phospholipase A2 (iPLA2β) in β-cells. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2004 doi: 10.1139/y04-064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kinghorn KJ, et al. Loss of PLA2G6 leads to elevated mitochondrial lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial dysfunction. Brain. 2015 doi: 10.1093/brain/awv132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Balsinde J, Balboa MA. Cellular regulation and proposed biological functions of group VIA calcium-independent phospholipase A2 in activated cells. Cellular Signalling. 2005 doi: 10.1016/Jcellsig.2005.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ramanadham S, et al. Calcium-independent phospholipases A2 and their roles in biological processes and diseases. Journal of Lipid Research. 2015 doi: 10.1194/jlr.R058701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paisan-Ruiz C, et al. Characterization of PLA2G6 as a locus for dystonia-parkinsonism. Ann Neurol. 2009;65:19–23. doi: 10.1002/ana.21415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Paisán-Ruiz C, et al. Early-onset L-dopa-responsive Parkinsonism with pyramidal signs due to ATP13A2, PLA2G6, FBXO7 and Spatacsin mutations. Movement Disorders. 2010 doi: 10.1002/mds.23221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sina F, Shojaee S, Elahi E, Paisán-Ruiz C. R632W mutation in PLA2G6 segregates with dystonia-parkinsonism in a consanguineous Iranian family. Eur J Neurol. 2009 doi: 10.1111/J1468-1331.2008.02356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bohlega SA, et al. Clinical heterogeneity of PLA2G6-related Parkinsonism: Analysis of two Saudi families. BMC Res Notes. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2102-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gui YX, et al. Four novel rare mutations of PLA2G6 in Chinese population with Parkinson’s disease. Park Relat Disord. 2013 doi: 10.1016/Jparkreldis.2012.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shen T, et al. Genetic analysis of ATP13A2, PLA2G6 and FBXO7 in a cohort of Chinese patients with early-onset Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32217-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kapoor S, et al. Genetic analysis of PLA2G6 in 22 Indian families with infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy, atypical late-onset neuroaxonal dystrophy and dystonia parkinsonism complex. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lu CS, et al. PLA2G6 mutations in PARK14-linked young-onset parkinsonism and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Am J Med Genet Part B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2012 doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shen T, et al. Early-onset parkinson’s disease caused by pla2g6 compound heterozygous mutation, a case report and literature review. Front Neurol. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fnEur2019.00915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chu YT, Lin HY, Chen PL, Lin CH. Genotype-phenotype correlations of adult-onset PLA2G6-associated Neurodegeneration: Case series and literature review. BMC Neurol. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01684-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ferese R, et al. Heterozygous PLA2G6 mutation leads to iron accumulation within basal ganglia and Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fnEur2018.00536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Paisán-Ruiz C, et al. Widespread Lewy body and tau accumulation in childhood and adult onset dystonia-parkinsonism cases with PLA2G6 mutations. Neurobiol Aging. 2012 doi: 10.1016/Jneurobiolaging.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Miki Y, et al. PLA2G6 accumulates in Lewy bodies in PARK14 and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. NeuroSci Lett. 2017;645:40–45. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lin G, et al. Phospholipase PLA2G6, a Parkinsonism-Associated Gene, Affects Vps26 and Vps35, Retromer Function, and Ceramide Levels, Similar to α-Synuclein Gain. Cell Metab. 2018 doi: 10.1016/Jcmet.2018.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Iliadi KG, Gluscencova OB, Iliadi N, Boulianne GL. Mutations in the Drosophila homolog of human PLA2G6 give rise to age-dependent loss of psychomotor activity and neurodegeneration. Sci Rep. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21343-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mori A, et al. Parkinson’s disease-associated iPLA2-VIA/PLA2G6 regulates neuronal functions and α-synuclein stability through membrane remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA. 2019 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902958116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chiu CC, et al. PARK14 (D331Y) PLA2G6 Causes Early-Onset Degeneration of Substantia Nigra Dopaminergic Neurons by Inducing Mitochondrial Dysfunction, ER Stress, Mitophagy Impairment and Transcriptional Dysregulation in a Knockin Mouse Model. Mol Neurobiol. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1118-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sumi-Akamaru H, et al. High expression of α-synuclein in damaged mitochondria with PLA2G6 dysfunction. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0298-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Engel LA, Jing Z, O’Brien DE, Sun M, Kotzbauer PT. Catalytic function of PLA2G6 is impaired by mutations associated with infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy but not dystonia-parkinsonism. PLoS One. 2010;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chiu CC, et al. PARK14 PLA2G6 mutants are defective in preventing rotenoneinduced mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS generation and activation of mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Oncotarget. 2017 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Feske S, Prakriya M, Rao A, Lewis RS. A severe defect in CRAC Ca2+ channel activation and altered K+ channel gating in T cells from immunodeficient patients. J Exp Med. 2005;202:651–662. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Feske S, et al. A mutation in Orai1 causes immune deficiency by abrogating CRAC channel function. Nature. 2006;441:179–185. doi: 10.1038/nature04702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vig M, et al. CRACM1 is a plasma membrane protein essential for store-operated Ca2+ entry. Science. 2006;312:1220–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1127883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Smani T, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Callejo-Garcia P, Rosado JA, Avila-Medina J. Phospholipase A2 as a Molecular Determinant of Store-Operated Calcium Entry. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;898:111–131. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26974-0_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schäfer C, Rymarczyk G, Ding L, Kirber MT, Bolotina VM. Role of molecular determinants of store-operated Ca(2+) entry (Orai1, phospholipase A2 group 6, and STIM1) in focal adhesion formation and cell migration. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:40745–57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.407155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Singaravelu K. Regulation of Store-Operated Calcium Entry by Calcium-Independent Phospholipase A2 in Rat Cerebellar Astrocytes. J Neurosci. 2006;26:9579–9592. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2604-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bolotina VM. Orai, STIM1 and iPLA2 β: A view from a different perspective. Journal of Physiology. 2008 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.154997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lu B, Fivaz M. Neuronal SOCE: Myth or Reality? Trends in Cell Biology. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jtcb.2016.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Michel PP, Hirsch EC, Hunot S. Understanding Dopaminergic Cell Death Pathways in Parkinson Disease. Neuron. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jneuron.2016.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhou Q, et al. Impairment of PARK14-dependent Ca2+signalling is a novel determinant of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun. 2016;7 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ke M, et al. Azoramide protects iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons with PLA2G6 D331Y mutation through restoring ER function and CREB signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2312-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Narendra D, Walker JE, Youle R. Mitochondrial quality control mediated by PINK1 and Parkin: Links to parkinsonism. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2012 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yamano K, Youle RJ. PINK1 is degraded through the N-end rule pathway. Autophagy. 2013 doi: 10.4161/auto.24633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lin W, Kang UJ. Characterization of PINK1 processing, stability, and subcellular localization. J Neurochem. 2008 doi: 10.1111/J1471-4159.2008.05398.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Taanman JW, Protasoni M. Loss of PINK1 or parkin function results in a progressive loss of mitochondrial function. in. Autophagy: Cancer, Other Pathologies, Inflammation, Immunity, Infection, and Aging. 2017;12 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812146-7.00007-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Matsuda N, et al. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J Cell Biol. 2010 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200910140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Seirafi M, Kozlov G, Gehring K. Parkin structure and function. FEBS Journal. 2015 doi: 10.1111/febs.13249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lesage S, Brice A. Parkinson’s disease: From monogenic forms to genetic susceptibility factors. Human Molecular Genetics. 2009 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bonifati V, et al. Mutations in the DJ-1 gene associated with autosomal recessive early-onset parkinsonism. Science (80-) 2003 doi: 10.1126/science.1077209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu Y, et al. DJ-1 regulates the integrity and function of ER-mitochondria association through interaction with IP3R3-Grp75-VDAC1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906565116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ramirez A, et al. Hereditary parkinsonism with dementia is caused by mutations in ATP13A2, encoding a lysosomal type 5 P-type ATPase. Nat Genet. 2006 doi: 10.1038/ng1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wang R, et al. ATP13A2 facilitates HDAC6 recruitment to lysosome to promote autophagosome-lysosome fusion. J Cell Biol. 2019 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201804165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhou ZD, Lee JCT, Tan EK. Pathophysiological mechanisms linking F-box only protein 7 (FBXO7) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research. 2018 doi: 10.1016/Jmrrev.2018.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhou ZD, Sathiyamoorthy S, Angeles DC, Tan EK. Linking F-box protein 7 and parkin to neuronal degeneration in Parkinson’s disease (PD) Mol Brain. 2016 doi: 10.1186/s13041-016-0218-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhao T, et al. Loss of nuclear activity of the FBXO7 protein in patients with parkinsonian-pyramidal syndrome (PARK15) PLoS One. 2011 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Guidubaldi A, et al. Novel mutations in SPG11 cause hereditary spastic paraplegia associated with early-onset levodopa-responsive Parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2011 doi: 10.1002/mds.23552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cao L, et al. Novel SPG11 mutations in Chinese families with hereditary spastic paraplegia with thin corpus callosum. Park Relat Disord. 2013 doi: 10.1016/Jparkreldis.2012.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Anett I, et al. Hereditary Parkinson’s disease as a new clinical manifestation of the damaged POLG gene. Orv Hetil. 2020 doi: 10.1556/650.2020.31724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Miguel R, et al. POLG1-related levodopa-responsive parkinsonism. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 doi: 10.1016/Jclineuro.2014.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Malli R, Graier WF. The role of mitochondria in the activation/maintenance of SOCE: The contribution of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, mitochondrial motility, and location to store-operated Ca2+ entry. in. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2017 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57732-6_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.SpätASzanda G. The role of mitochondria in the activation/maintenance of SOCE: Store-operated Ca2+ entry and mitochondria. in. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2017 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57732-6_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sampson TR, et al. Gut Microbiota Regulate Motor Deficits and Neuroinflammation in a Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Cell. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jcell.2016.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.William Langston J, Ballard P, Tetrud JW, Irwin I. Chronic parkinsonism in humans due to a product of meperidine-analog synthesis. Science (80-) 1983 doi: 10.1126/science.6823561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schapira AHV, et al. Mitochondrial Complex I Deficiency in Parkinson’s Disease. J Neurochem. 1990 doi: 10.1111/J1471-4159.1990.tb02325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Chen H, Chan DC. Mitochondrial dynamics-fusion, fission, movement, and mitophagy-in neurodegenerative diseases. Hum Mol Genet. 2009 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pryde KR, Smith HL, Chau KY, Schapira AHV. PINK1 disables the antifission machinery to segregate damaged mitochondria for mitophagy. J Cell Biol. 2016 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201509003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Scarffe LA, Stevens DA, Dawson VL, Dawson TM. Parkin and PINK1: Much more than mitophagy. Trends in Neurosciences. 2014 doi: 10.1016/Jtins.2014.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yu W, Sun Y, Guo S, Lu B. The PINK1/Parkin pathway regulates mitochondrial dynamics and function in mammalian hippocampal and dopaminergic neurons. Hum Mol Genet. 2011 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Irrcher I, et al. Loss of the Parkinson’s disease-linked gene DJ-1 perturbs mitochondrial dynamics. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Park JS, Koentjoro B, Veivers D, Mackay-Sim A, Sue CM. Parkinson’s disease-associated human ATP13A2 (PARK9) deficiency causes zinc dyshomeostasis and mitochondrial dysfunction. Hum Mol Genet. 2014 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zheng L, et al. Parkin functionally interacts with PGC-1α to preserve mitochondria and protect dopaminergic neurons. Hum Mol Genet. 2017 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Brunelli F, Valente EM, Arena G. Mechanisms of neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease: keep neurons in the PINK1. Mech Ageing Dev. 2020 doi: 10.1016/Jmad.2020.111277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu S, et al. Parkinson’s disease-associated kinase PINK1 regulates miro protein level and axonal transport of mitochondria. PLoS Genet. 2012 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Weihofen A, Thomas KJ, Ostaszewski BL, Cookson MR, Selkoe DJ. Pink1 forms a multiprotein complex with miro and milton, linking Pink1 function to mitochondrial trafficking. Biochemistry. 2009 doi: 10.1021/bi8019178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Deas E, Wood NW, Plun-Favreau H. Mitophagy and Parkinson’s disease: The PINK1-parkin link. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Cell Research. 2011 doi: 10.1016/Jbbamcr.2010.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yamano K, Youle RJ. Two different axes CALCOCO2-RB1CC1 and OPTN-ATG9A initiate PRKN-mediated mitophagy. Autophagy. 2020 doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1815457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Burchell VS, et al. The Parkinson’s disease-linked proteins Fbxo7 and Parkin interact to mediate mitophagy. Nat Neurosci. 2013 doi: 10.1038/nn.3489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kuroda Y, et al. Parkin enhances mitochondrial biogenesis in proliferating cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2006 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pirooznia SK, et al. PARIS induced defects in mitochondrial biogenesis drive dopamine neuron loss under conditions of parkin or PINK1 deficiency. Mol Neurodegener. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s13024-020-00363-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Bento CF, Ashkenazi A, Jimenez-Sanchez M, Rubinsztein DC. The Parkinson’s disease-associated genes ATP13A2 and SYT11 regulate autophagy via a common pathway. Nat Commun. 2016 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kett LR, et al. α-synuclein-independent histopathological and motor deficits in mice lacking the endolysosomal parkinsonism protein Atp13a2. J Neurosci. 2015 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSci0632-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Okarmus J, et al. Lysosomal perturbations in human dopaminergic neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells with PARK2 mutation. Sci Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67091-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Xu CY, et al. DJ-1 inhibits α-synuclein aggregation by regulating chaperone-mediated autophagy. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Krebiehl G, et al. Reduced basal autophagy and impaired mitochondrial dynamics due to loss of Parkinson’s disease-associated protein DJ-1. PLoS One. 2010 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Schieber M, Chandel NS. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Current Biology. 2014 doi: 10.1016/Jcub.2014.03.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Bogetofte H, et al. PARK2 mutation causes metabolic disturbances and impaired survival of human iPSC-derived neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lee Y, et al. Parthanatos mediates AIMP2-activated age-dependent dopaminergic neuronal loss. Nat Neurosci. 2013 doi: 10.1038/nn.3500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wang HL, et al. PARK6 PINK1 mutants are defective in maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential and inhibiting ROS formation of substantia nigra dopaminergic neurons. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Basis Dis. 2011 doi: 10.1016/Jbbadis.2011.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Ren X, Hinchie A, Swomley A, Powell DK, Butterfield DA. Profiles of brain oxidative damage, ventricular alterations, and neurochemical metabolites in the striatum of PINK1 knockout rats as functions of age and gender: Relevance to Parkinson disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019 doi: 10.1016/JfreeradbioMed2019.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kostic M, et al. PKA Phosphorylation of NCLX Reverses Mitochondrial Calcium Overload and Depolarization, Promoting Survival of PINK1-Deficient Dopaminergic Neurons. Cell Rep. 2015 doi: 10.1016/Jcelrep.2015.08.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Chan JYH, Chan SHH. Activation of endogenous antioxidants as a common therapeutic strategy against cancer, neurodegeneration and cardiovascular diseases: A lesson learnt from DJ-1. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Takahashi-Niki K, Niki T, Taira T, Iguchi-Ariga SMM, Ariga H. Reduced antioxidative stress activities of DJ-1 mutants found in Parkinson’s disease patients. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 doi: 10.1016/Jbbrc.2004.05.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Karunakaran S, et al. Activation of apoptosis signal regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) and translocation of death-associated protein, Daxx, in substantia nigra pars compacta in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease: protection by α-lipoic acid. FASEB J. 2007 doi: 10.1096/fJ06-7580com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Xu S, Yang X, Qian Y, Xiao Q. Parkinson’s disease-related DJ-1 modulates the expression of uncoupling protein 4 against oxidative stress. J Neurochem. 2018 doi: 10.1111/jnc.14297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Oh SE, et al. The Parkinson’s disease gene product DJ-1 modulates miR-221 to promote neuronal survival against oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 2018 doi: 10.1016/Jredox.2018.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Jeong HJ, et al. Transduced tat-DJ-1 protein protects against oxidative stress-induced SH-SY5Y cell death and Parkinson disease in a mouse model. Mol Cells. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s10059-012-2255-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Kahle PJ, Waak J, Gasser T. DJ-1 and prevention of oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease and other age-related disorders. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbioMed2009.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Xu Q, et al. Hypoxia regulation of ATP13A2 (PARK9) gene transcription. J Neurochem. 2012 doi: 10.1111/J1471-4159.2012.07676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Vrijsen S, et al. ATP13A2-mediated endo-lysosomal polyamine export counters mitochondrial oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922342117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Takahashi K, et al. Induction of {Pluripotent} {Stem} {Cells} from {Adult} {Human} {Fibroblasts} by {Defined} {Factors} Cell. 2007;131:861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Park IH, et al. Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell. 2008 doi: 10.1016/Jcell.2008.07.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Soldner F, et al. Parkinson’s Disease Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Viral Reprogramming Factors. Cell. 2009 doi: 10.1016/Jcell.2009.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Playne R, Connor B. Understanding Parkinson’s Disease through the Use of Cell Reprogramming. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 2017 doi: 10.1007/s12015-017-9717-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hoekstra SD, Stringer S, Heine VM, Posthuma D. Genetically-informed patient selection for iPSC studies of complex diseases may aid in reducing cellular heterogeneity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Tran J, Anastacio H, Bardy C. Genetic predispositions of Parkinson’s disease revealed in patient-derived brain cells. npj Parkinson’s Disease. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41531-020-0110-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Arias-Fuenzalida J, et al. FACS-Assisted CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Facilitates Parkinson’s Disease Modeling. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;9:1423–1431. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Qing X, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 and piggyBac-mediated footprint-free LRRK2-G2019S knock-in reveals neuronal complexity phenotypes and α-Synuclein modulation in dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cell Res. 2017 doi: 10.1016/Jscr.2017.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Soldner F, et al. Parkinson-associated risk variant in distal enhancer of α-synuclein modulates target gene expression. Nature. 2016 doi: 10.1038/nature17939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Vermilyea SC, et al. In Vitro CRISPR/Cas9-Directed Gene Editing to Model LRRK2 G2019S Parkinson’s Disease in Common Marmosets. Sci Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60273-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ono Y, et al. Differences in neurogenic potential in floor plate cells along an anteroposterior location: Midbrain dopaminergic neurons originate from mesencephalic floor plate cells. Development. 2007 doi: 10.1242/dev.02879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Arenas E, Denham M, Villaescusa JC. How to make a midbrain dopaminergic neuron. Dev. 2015 doi: 10.1242/dev.097394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kirkeby A, et al. Generation of Regionally Specified Neural Progenitors and Functional Neurons from Human Embryonic Stem Cells under Defined Conditions. Cell Rep. 2012;1:703714. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Kriks S, et al. Dopamine neurons derived from human ES cells efficiently engraft in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Nature. 2011;480:547–551. doi: 10.1038/nature10648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Reinhardt P, et al. Derivation and Expansion Using Only Small Molecules of Human Neural Progenitors for Neurodegenerative Disease Modeling. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Monzel AS, et al. Derivation of Human Midbrain-Specific Organoids from Neuroepithelial Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2017;8:1144–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Smits LM, Schwamborn JC. Midbrain Organoids: A New Tool to Investigate Parkinson’s Disease. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Smits LM, et al. Modeling Parkinson’s disease in midbrain-like organoids. npj Park Dis. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41531-019-0078-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Suzuki S, et al. Efficient induction of dopaminergic neuron differentiation from induced pluripotent stem cells reveals impaired mitophagy in PARK2 neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017 doi: 10.1016/Jbbrc.2016.12.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kikuchi T, et al. Human iPS cell-derived dopaminergic neurons function in a primate Parkinson’s disease model. Nature. 2017 doi: 10.1038/nature23664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Calatayud C, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated generation of a tyrosine hydroxylase reporter iPSC line for live imaging and isolation of dopaminergic neurons. Sci Rep. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43080-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Stathakos P, et al. A monolayer hiPSC culture system for autophagy/mitophagy studies in human dopaminergic neurons. Autophagy. 2020 doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1739441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Stathakos P, et al. Imaging autophagy in hiPSC-derived midbrain dopaminergic neuronal cultures for parkinson’s disease research. in. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2019 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8873-0_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Zhu L, et al. Stress-induced precocious aging in PD-patient iPSC-derived NSCs may underlie the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Dis. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1313-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Imaizumi Y, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction associated with increased oxidative stress and α-synuclein accumulation in PARK2 iPSC-derived neurons and postmortem brain tissue. Mol Brain. 2012 doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-5-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Jiang H, et al. Parkin controls dopamine utilization in human midbrain dopaminergic neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat Commun. 2012 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Chung SY, et al. Parkin and PINK1 Patient iPSC-Derived Midbrain Dopamine Neurons Exhibit Mitochondrial Dysfunction and α-Synuclein Accumulation. Stem Cell Reports. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jstemcr.2016.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Oh CK, et al. S-Nitrosylation of PINK1 Attenuates PINK1/Parkin-Dependent Mitophagy in hiPSC-Based Parkinson’s Disease Models. Cell Rep. 2017 doi: 10.1016/Jcelrep.2017.10.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Tieng V, et al. Engineering of midbrain organoids containing long-lived dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cells Dev. 2014 doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Kim H, et al. Modeling G2019S-LRRK2 Sporadic Parkinson’s Disease in 3D Midbrain Organoids. Stem Cell Reports. 2019 doi: 10.1016/Jstemcr.2019.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Jo J, et al. Midbrain-like Organoids from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Contain Functional Dopaminergic and Neuromelanin-Producing Neurons. Cell Stem Cell. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jstem.2016.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Monzel AS, et al. Derivation of Human Midbrain-Specific Organoids from Neuroepithelial Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2017 doi: 10.1016/Jstemcr.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Qian X, et al. Brain-Region-Specific Organoids Using Mini-bioreactors for Modeling ZIKV Exposure. Cell. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jcell.2016.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Jan A, et al. Activity of translation regulator eukaryotic elongation factor-2 kinase is increased in Parkinson disease brain and its inhibition reduces alpha synuclein toxicity. ActaNeuropathol. Commun. 2018 doi: 10.1186/s40478-018-0554-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Chlebanowska P, Tejchman A, Sułkowski M, Skrzypek K, Majka M. Use of 3D organoids as a model to study idiopathic form of parkinson’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 doi: 10.3390/ijms21030694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Ahfeldt T, et al. Pathogenic Pathways in Early-Onset Autosomal Recessive Parkinson’s Disease Discovered Using Isogenic Human Dopaminergic Neurons. Stem Cell Reports. 2020 doi: 10.1016/Jstemcr.2019.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kano M, et al. Reduced astrocytic reactivity in human brains and midbrain organoids with PRKN mutations. npj Park Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41531-020-00137-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Jarazo J, et al. Parkinson’s disease phenotypes in patient specific brain organoids are improved by HP-β-CD treatment. bioRxiv. 2019 doi: 10.1101/813089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Galet B, Cheval H, Ravassard P. Patient-Derived Midbrain Organoids to Explore the Molecular Basis of Parkinson’s Disease. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fnEur2020.01005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Fan Y, Winanto Ng SY. Replacing what’s lost: A new era of stem cell therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Translational Neurodegeneration. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s40035-019-0180-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Kirkeby A, et al. Predictive Markers Guide Differentiation to Improve Graft Outcome in Clinical Translation of hESC-Based Therapy for Parkinson’s Disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2017 doi: 10.1016/Jstem.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Nolbrant S, Heuer A, Parmar M, Kirkeby A. Generation of high-purity human ventral midbrain dopaminergic progenitors for in vitro maturation and intracerebral transplantation. Nat Protoc. 2017 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Schweitzer JS, et al. Personalized iPSC-Derived Dopamine Progenitor Cells for Parkinson’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020 doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1915872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Barker RA, Studer L, Cattaneo E, Takahashi J. G-Force PD: a global initiative in coordinating stem cell-based dopamine treatments for Parkinson’s disease. npj Parkinson’s Disease. 2015 doi: 10.1038/npjparkd.2015.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Garitaonandia I, et al. Neural stem cell tumorigenicity and biodistribution assessment for Phase I clinical trial in Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1038/srep34478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Wang YK, et al. Human Clinical-Grade Parthenogenetic ESC-Derived Dopaminergic Neurons Recover Locomotive Defects of Nonhuman Primate Models of Parkinson’s Disease. Stem Cell Reports. 2018 doi: 10.1016/Jstemcr.2018.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Barker RA, Parmar M, Studer L, Takahashi J. Human Trials of Stem Cell-Derived Dopamine Neurons for Parkinson’s Disease: Dawn of a New Era. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:569–573. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Doi D, et al. Pre-clinical study of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells for Parkinson’s disease. Nat Commun. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17165-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Lin L, et al. Molecular Features Underlying Neurodegeneration Identified through In Vitro Modeling of Genetically Diverse Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Cell Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jcelrep.2016.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Cui J, et al. Quantification of dopaminergic neuron differentiation and neurotoxicity via a genetic reporter. Sci Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1038/srep25181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Paik EJ, O’Neil AL, Ng SY, Sun C, Rubin LL. Using intracellular markers to identify a novel set of surface markers for live cell purification from a heterogeneous hIPSC culture. Sci Rep. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19291-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Hartfield EM, et al. Physiological characterisation of human iPS-derived dopaminergic neurons. PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Sánchez-Danés A, et al. Efficient generation of A9 midbrain dopaminergic neurons by lentiviral delivery of LMX1A in human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2012 doi: 10.1089/Hum2011.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Woodard CM, et al. IPSC-derived dopamine neurons reveal differences between monozygotic twins discordant for parkinson’s disease. Cell Rep. 2014 doi: 10.1016/Jcelrep.2014.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Kim TW, Koo SY, Studer L. Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies for Parkinson Disease: Present Challenges and Future Opportunities. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Vera E, Bosco N, Studer L. Generating Late-Onset Human iPSC-Based Disease Models by Inducing Neuronal Age-Related Phenotypes through Telomerase Manipulation. Cell Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1016/Jcelrep.2016.09.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Miller JD, et al. Human iPSC-based modeling of late-onset disease via progerin-induced aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2013 doi: 10.1016/Jstem.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Sison SL, Vermilyea SC, Emborg ME, Ebert AD. Using Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells to Identify Parkinson’s Disease-Relevant Phenotypes. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0893-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Cooper O, et al. Pharmacological rescue of mitochondrial deficits in iPSC-derived neural cells from patients with familial Parkinson’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2012 doi: 10.1126/scitranslMed3003985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Kwak TH, et al. Generation of homogeneous midbrain organoids with in vivo-like cellular composition facilitates neurotoxin-based Parkinson’s disease modeling. Stem Cells. 2020 doi: 10.1002/stem.3163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]