Skip to main content
Archives of Emergency Medicine logoLink to Archives of Emergency Medicine
. 1988 Jun;5(2):101–109. doi: 10.1136/emj.5.2.101

Accuracy of detection of radiographic abnormalities by junior doctors.

C A Vincent 1, P A Driscoll 1, R J Audley 1, D S Grant 1
PMCID: PMC1285496  PMID: 3408527

Abstract

This study assessed the ability of junior doctors in accident and emergency to detect radiographic abnormalities. Their assessments of 505 radiographs taken at nights and weekends over a period of 8 months and showing abnormalities were examined. Each assessment by a senior house officer (SHO) was compared with the subsequent diagnosis of a radiologist of senior registrar or consultant status. An error rate of 35% was found. For abnormalities with clinically significant consequences the error rate was 39%. Although this error rate appears high the results are consistent with those of earlier studies in that missed positive radiographs constitute 2.8% of the total number of radiographs taken in the period. It is considered that the proportion of missed abnormalities gives a truer index of SHOs' abilities. No improvement in performance was evident over the 6-month period of the SHOs tenure of post. It is argued that it is unrealistic to expect accident and emergency SHOs to acquire this complex skill simply through experience and that more formal training and guidance is needed.

Full text

PDF
101

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berman L., de Lacey G., Craig O. A survey of accident and emergency reporting: results and implications. Clin Radiol. 1985 Sep;36(5):483–484. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(85)80194-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berman L., de Lacey G., Twomey E., Twomey B., Welch T., Eban R. Reducing errors in the accident department: a simple method using radiographers. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Feb 9;290(6466):421–422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6466.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carew-McColl M. Radiological interpretation in an accident and emergency department. Br J Clin Pract. 1983 Nov-Dec;37(11-12):375–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gleadhill D. N., Thomson J. Y., Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 11;294(6577):943–947. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6577.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wardrope J., Chennells P. M. Should all casualty radiographs be reviewed? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 1;290(6482):1638–1640. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6482.1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. de Lacey G., Barker A., Harper J., Wignall B. An assessment of the clinical effects of reporting accident and emergency radiographs. Br J Radiol. 1980 Apr;53(628):304–309. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-53-628-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Emergency Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES