Abstract
Background
Intragastric administration of virulent Rhodococcus equi protects foals against subsequent experimental intrabronchial (IB) infection, but it is unknown whether R. equi naturally ingested by foals contributes to their susceptibility to pneumonia.
Hypothesis
Fecal concentration of virulent R. equi before IB infection with R. equi is positively associated with protection from pneumonia in foals.
Animals
Twenty‐one university‐owned foals.
Methods
Samples were collected from experimental studies. Five foals were gavaged with live, virulent R. equi (LVRE) at age 2 and 4 days; the remaining 16 foals were not gavaged with LVRE (controls). Fecal swabs were collected from foals at ages 28 days, immediately before IB infection. Foals were monitored for clinical signs of pneumonia, and fecal swabs were collected approximately 2 weeks after IB infection. Swabs were tested by quantitative PCR for concentration of virulent R. equi (ie, copy numbers of the virulence‐associated protein A gene [vapA] per 100 ng fecal DNA).
Results
Fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi (vapA) before IB infection were significantly (P < .05) lower in control foals (25 copies/100 ng DNA [95% CI, 5 to 118 copies/100 ng DNA) that developed pneumonia (n = 8) than in healthy control foals (n = 8; 280 copies/100 ng DNA; 95% CI, 30 to 2552 copies/100 ng DNA) or those gavaged with LVRE (707 copies/100 ng DNA, 95% CI, 54 to 9207 copies/100 ng DNA).
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Greater natural ingestion of LVRE might contribute to protection against pneumonia among foals.
Keywords: equid, neonatology, PCR assays, pneumonia, Rhodococcus
Abbreviations
- 95% CI
95% confidence interval
- CFU
colony forming units
- IB
intrabronchial
- LVRE
live, virulent Rhodococcus equi
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- pCR‐VapA
plasmid into which the virulence associated protein A gene of Rhodococcus equi was cloned
- qPCR
quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- R. equi
Rhodococcus equi
- T‐TBA
transendoscopic tracheobronchial aspirate
- VapA
virulence‐associated protein A
1. INTRODUCTION
Rhodococcus equi is gram‐positive, soil saprophyte and a facultative intracellular pathogen primarily recognized as a cause of foal pneumonia. 1 , 2 , 3 Strains that are virulent in foals carry a plasmid that encodes the virulence‐associated protein A (VapA). 3 , 4 VapA‐positive strains are virtually ubiquitous in the environment of foals, including soil, air, and the feces of their dams. 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 The ubiquity of R. equi in horses and their environment complicates efforts to investigate immune responses to experimental infection with or immunization against this bacterium because of the ineluctable confounding effects of natural exposure. Moreover, the impact of natural exposure to R. equi on immunity to this bacterium appears complex. The airborne burden of virulent R. equi has been associated with increased odds of disease at the levels of farm 7 and individual foal, 10 , 11 suggesting that greater airborne exposure increases the risk of R. equi pneumonia in foals, presumably through inhalation of virulent isolates. In contrast, epidemiological investigations have demonstrated that concentrations of virulent R. equi in soil from horse farms or in mare feces are not associated with increased odds of pneumonia in foals. 7 , 8 , 12 However, intragastric administration of virulent R. equi to foals provides protection against subsequent intrabronchial (IB) infection. 15 , 16 This suggests that coprophagia or ingestion of soil by foals might provide some degree of protection through natural exposure. This hypothesis is further supported by the evidence of varying incidence of pneumonia among foals in the same environment at farms. 2 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 12 , 17 , 18 , 19 Varying enteral exposure to ingested or swallowed R. equi might contribute to the varying incidence of disease observed in foals with similar natural or experimental exposure to R. equi.
The concentration of virulent R. equi in feces cannot be determined directly by quantitative culture because it is necessary to differentiate virulent from avirulent strains using either immunoassays to detect VapA protein (such as immunoblotting) 13 , 14 or nucleic‐acid based methods (such as polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) to detect vapA. 20 , 21 , 22 Our laboratory has developed a quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detection of absolute copy numbers of vapA in fecal samples based on a standard curve and the assumption that each R. equi has a single copy of vapA. 21 , 22 Fecal qPCR can be used to quantify the concentration of virulent R. equi in feces by testing a standardized amount of either fecal mass or fecal DNA. Foals with R. equi pneumonia have been demonstrated to shed higher concentrations of virulent R. equi than healthy foals of similar age. 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27
We have noted variability in the proportion of foals that develop clinical signs of pneumonia to IB infection of the same dose (eg, 1 × 106 colony forming units [CFU]) of the same strain of virulent R. equi administered to foals in the same environment experiencing similar management (unpublished data in addition to cited references). 28 , 29 , 30 Given that intragastric administration of virulent R. equi protects foals against subsequent IB challenge, 15 , 16 we hypothesized that foals that developed clinical signs of pneumonia after IB infection with virulent R. equi would have lower fecal concentrations of R. equi as determined by qPCR before IB infection than foals that were infected with the same strain at the same age that did not develop pneumonia. We further hypothesized that foals that developed clinical signs of pneumonia would have significantly higher concentrations of virulent R. equi in feces at the time of onset of clinical signs than foals of the same age that did not develop pneumonia after infection.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Texas A&M University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
2.2. Study cohort
The study cohort was a convenience sample of 21 foals born in 2021 being used in research projects addressing other specific aims. Thus, no a priori sample size calculations were performed. All foals were Quarter Horse foals that were healthy at birth, had transfer of passive immunity assessed by a semiquantitative immunoassay (SNAP Foal IgG Test, IDEXX, Westbrook, ME, USA), and results of complete blood counts (CBCs) within reference ranges at ages 1 and 28 days. Five foals were gavaged at ages 2 and 4 days with approximately 2 × 1010 colony forming units (CFU) live, virulent R. equi (LVRE) using strain ATCC reference strain 33701 (ATCC, Manassas, Virginia); bacteria were suspended in 120 mL sterile saline for each treatment and were administered via nasogastric intubation. These 5 foals were part of a project studying immune responses to intragastric administration of LVRE (gavaged foals). The remaining foals (n = 16) were used in a study of immunity to IB infection with virulent R. equi (control foals). Foals were maintained in stalls with their dams for 7 days after foaling, then housed in paddocks with 2 or 3 other mare‐foal pairs until age 28 days. All foals were housed and maintained in paddocks at a single facility.
2.3. Experimental infection
Before IB infection with R. equi, each foal's lungs were auscultated and examined by thoracic ultrasonography to document absence of preexisting pulmonary disease. Ultrasound examinations were repeated weekly after infection to monitor for lung lesions. At age 28 days, foals were sedated with xylazine (0.2 mg/kg) and butorphanol tartrate (0.04 mg/kg) and then infected transendoscopically with 25 mL of R. equi suspension containing 1 × 106 CFU of a strain derived from a pneumonic foal infused into each mainstem bronchus (right and left). 28 , 29 Approximately 200 μL of the challenge dose was saved to confirm the concentration (dose) administered, and to verify virulence of the isolate using multiplex PCR.
2.4. Fecal swabbing
Fecal swabs were collected from foals using sterile 16‐in. cotton‐tipped swabs (Scopettes 16″ Comfort Tip Applicators, Birchwood Laboratories, Eden Prairie, Minnesota) inserted approximately 5 cm into the rectum and gently rotated to collect fecal material from the rectal wall. Swabs were retracted and placed in sterile conical tubes, the shaft was cut, and the tubes were closed and transported to the laboratory where they were frozen at −80°C until DNA extraction. Fecal swabs were collected from each foal twice. The first sample was collected from all foals immediately before IB infection at age 28 days. Foals that developed pneumonia were sampled at the onset of clinical signs of disease (median, 14 days after infection; range, 12‐19 days after infection) or at age 42 days (14 days after infection) from foals that remained healthy.
2.5. Clinical monitoring
Foals were observed twice daily from birth for signs of disease by the authors. The person determining pneumonia status (NDC) was masked to the treatment status of the foals. Beginning at age 28 days (the day of infection), rectal temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, signs of increased respiratory effort (abdominal lift, flaring nostrils), presence of abnormal lung sounds (crackles or wheezes, evaluated for both hemithoraces), presence of abnormal tracheal sounds, coughing, signs of depressed attitude (subjective evidence of increased recumbence, lethargy, reluctance to rise), and nasal discharges were monitored, and results recorded twice daily through age 84 days. Thoracic ultrasonography was performed on the day of infection (before infection) and then weekly to identify evidence of peripheral pulmonary consolidation or abscess formation consistent with R. equi pneumonia. Foals were considered to have clinical signs of pneumonia if they demonstrated ≥3 of the following clinical signs: coughing at rest; depressed attitude; rectal temperature >39.4°C; respiratory rate ≥60 breaths/min; or, increased respiratory effort. Foals were diagnosed with R. equi pneumonia if they had clinical signs of pneumonia, ultrasonographic evidence of pulmonary abscess formation or consolidation with a maximal diameter of ≥2.0 cm, positive culture of R. equi from transendoscopic tracheobronchial aspirate (T‐TBA) fluid, and cytologic evidence of septic pneumonia from T‐TBA fluid. Foals diagnosed with R. equi pneumonia were treated with a combination of clarithromycin (7.5 mg/kg; PO; q 12 hours) and rifampin (5 mg/kg; PO; q 12 hours) until both clinical signs and thoracic ultrasonography lesions had resolved. Foals also were treated as deemed necessary by attending veterinarians with flunixin meglumine (0.6 to 1.1 mg/kg; PO; q 12 to 24 hours) for inflammation and fever.
2.6. Real‐time qPCR testing
Absolute quantification was performed using a standard curve based on the vapA gene, as previously described. 21 , 22 The vapA gene was amplified by PCR and cloned into a plasmid vector (pCR‐VapA = vector with cloned vapA) using a commercial kit (Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit, Invitrogen, Waltham, Massachusetts), transformed into an Escherichia coli clone (TOP10 Cells, Invitrogen), and purified plasmid DNA was extracted using a commercial kit (QIAprep Spin Miniprep, Qiagen, Germantown, Maryland). Ten‐fold serial dilutions of plasmid DNA (ranging from 101 to 107 copies of the pCR‐VapA/2 μL) were prepared in nuclease‐free water. Plasmid DNA standards were processed in triplicates on each qPCR plate. A standard curve was constructed using linear regression analysis of the log10 quantity of vapA copies per sample and the corresponding C T values. For all PCR runs, the linear correlation (R 2) between the initial copy number of vapA was determined to be >99% and the amplification efficiency estimated to be between 95% and 100%, as previously described. 21 , 22
Fecal material was removed from frozen swabs using stainless steel laboratory scoops for environmental samplers (Bal Supply Scoop, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts). An individual scoop was used for each sample to remove between 0.1 and 0.2 mg of fecal material from each swab. Fecal DNA was extracted using a commercial kit (Machery‐Nagel NucleoSpin DNA Stool kit, Allentown, Pennsylvania) per the manufacturer's instructions, and resuspended to a concentration of 50 ng of fecal DNA/μL. Real‐time, qPCR was performed as previously described. 21 , 22 Briefly, 2 μL (100 ng) of fecal DNA was added to 5 μL of a commercial master mix (TaqMan Fast Advanced, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts), 0.5 μL of a custom premix (Custom TaqMan Gene Expression Assays, Applied Biosystems), and 2.5 μL of buffered nuclease‐free water. The primer sequences were previously designed 21 , 22 based on the 564‐bp coding sequence of vapA for R. equi strain 33701 and chosen for their specificity for vapA. Samples were processed in a real‐time, qPCR unit using commercial software (QuantStudio Real‐Time PCR Software v1.3, Applied Biosystems). Samples were tested in triplicate and measured against a standard curve of the vapA gene for absolute quantification of copy numbers. The median of the triplicate values was used for analysis; samples that were below the lowest standard (10 copies/100 ng fecal DNA) were assigned a value of 0 copies. An assumption underlying our analysis was that each bacterial cell carried only 1 copy of the plasmid on which the vapA gene was encoded.
2.7. Data analysis
The primary aim of the study was to compare the fecal concentrations (copies of vapA/100 ng fecal DNA) of virulent R. equi before and after IB infection among 3 groups of foals (control foals that developed pneumonia, control foals that did not develop pneumonia, and gavaged foals [that did not develop pneumonia]). Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential methods. For descriptive purposes, categorical data were summarized as proportions and continuous data were summarized as either means and standard deviations (SDs) or medians and ranges when data distribution appeared non‐Gaussian. For inferential analysis, we compared the fecal concentrations of vapA between groups and sample‐times (ie, before and approximately 2 weeks after infection) using a linear mixed‐effects model with an exchangeable correlation matrix, with study group and sample‐time modeled as fixed, categorical effects and foal modeled as a random effect; analysis was performed using the lme function in the nlme package of R statistical software (Version 4.0.4, R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). Post hoc multiple comparisons between treatment groups and sampling times were made with the method of Tukey using the multicomp package in R statistical software. Copy numbers were log10‐transformed for analysis to conform with distributional assumptions underlying the linear mixed‐effects modeling. Maximum‐likelihood methods were used to estimate 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of model estimates. Model‐based estimates were back transformed (ie, exponentiated to power of 10). The birth‐month was compared among groups of foals using Fisher's exact test using R, and the fecal concentration of virulent R. equi was compared between a binary variable for birth‐month using a Wilcoxon rank‐sum test using R. For all analysis, a significance level of P < .05 was used.
3. RESULTS
Consistent with previous reports, 15 , 16 none of the foals gavaged with LVRE at ages 2 and 4 days developed pneumonia. Of the 16 control foals (not gavaged with LVRE), 8 (50%) developed clinical signs of pneumonia. All pneumonic foals were treated successfully and recovered without any residual signs or sequelae.
The concentrations of virulent R. equi in feces differed significantly among groups in manner that depended on sample time (Figure 1). Before infection, the estimated fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi in feces of control foals that subsequently developed pneumonia (mean, 25 copies/100 ng DNA; 95% CI, 5 to 118 copies/100 ng DNA) were significantly (P = .04 and P = .01, respectively) lower than those for control foals that were healthy (mean, 280 copies/100 ng DNA; 95% CI, 30 to 2552 copies/100 ng DNA) and those that were gavaged with LVRE and remained healthy (mean, 707 copies/100 ng DNA; 95% CI, 54 to 9207 copies/100 ng DNA). The difference in fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi between the healthy control group and the gavaged group before IB infection was not significant (P = .97).
FIGURE 1.
Copies of vapA gene of virulent R. equi per 100 ng DNA from feces of 21 foals in 3 groups of foals infected intrabronchially (IB) with virulent R. equi at age 28 days: (1) control foals that developed pneumonia after IB infection (Pneumonia; n = 8); (2) control foals that remained healthy after IB infection (Healthy; n = 8); and (3) foals that were gavaged with live, virulent R. equi at ages 2 and 4 days (Gavaged; n = 5). The left panel (before) represents concentrations on the day of IB infection (age 28 days, before IB infection) and the right panel (after) represents samples collected after IB infection with R. equi (age 42 days for healthy and gavaged foals and collected between 12 and 19 days [median, 14 days]) for pneumonia foals). Groups with different maroon letters differ significantly (P < .05) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Colors of dots represent different foals within treatment group. Concentrations of virulent R. equi were significantly lower before IB infection for foals in the pneumonia foal relative to the other 2 groups. Concentrations of virulent R. equi increased significantly after challenge for control foals that developed pneumonia but decreased significantly among foals in the gavaged group
The onset of pneumonia occurred between 12 and 19 days after infection (median, 14 days) among the 8 control foals that developed clinical signs. Fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi increased significantly (P < .001) among the pneumonic control foals from a mean of 25 copies/100 ng DNA before IB infection (95% CI, 5 to 118 copies/100 ng DNA) to a mean of 9401 copies/100 ng DNA (95% CI, 1217 to 72 646 copies/100 ng DNA) after IB infection, nearly a 400‐fold increase. The fecal concentration of virulent R. equi rose after IB infection in healthy control foals from a mean of 280 copies/100 ng DNA (95% CI, 29 to 2552 copies/100 ng DNA) before IB infection to a mean of 4116 copies/100 ng DNA (95% CI, 433 to 39 102) at age 42 days (2 weeks after IB challenge)—a nearly 15‐fold increase—but this difference was not significant (P = .06) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. In the gavaged foals, fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi decreased significantly (P < .001) from a mean of 707 copies/100 ng DNA (95% CI, 54 to 9207 copies/100 ng DNA) before IB infection to 4 copies/100 ng DNA (95% CI, < 1 to 45 copies/100 ng DNA) after IB infection. The concentrations of virulent R. equi in feces after IB infection of foals that were gavaged were significantly (P < .001) lower than those of either the healthy control foals or the pneumonic control foals; however, no significant difference (P = .97) was observed in the fecal concentrations after IB infection between the healthy control foals and the control foals that developed pneumonia.
Foals were born in 2021 between the months of January and May (Table 1), and the distribution of birth‐month differed significantly (P = .003) among groups. All healthy control foals (n = 8) were born in April or May, whereas only 1 of the 8 pneumonic control foals was born in April or May; 3 of the gavaged foals were born in April or May and 2 were born in February or March. Considering birth month as a binary outcome (January, February, or March vs April or May), the fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi were significantly (P = .03) higher before challenge for foals born in April or May (median, 146 copies/100 ng DNA; range, 24 to 30 722 copies/100 ng DNA) than for foals born in January, February, or March (Figure 2; median, 30 copies; range, 0 to 6189). Excluding the 5 foals gavaged with LVRE, fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi were still significantly (P = .02) higher for foals born in April or May (median, 139 copies/100 ng DNA; range, 24 to 7841 copies/100 ng DNA) than for foals born in January, February, or March (median, 37 copies; range, 0 to 5952 copies/100 ng DNA).
TABLE 1.
Birth‐month of foals infected intrabronchially with virulent R. equi at age 28 days by study group: (1) control foals that remained healthy (Healthy); (2) control foals that developed pneumonia (Pneumonia); and (3) foals that were gavaged (Gavaged) with live, virulent R. equi at ages 2 and 4 days
Month(s) | Healthy | Pneumonia | Gavaged |
---|---|---|---|
January | 0 | 1 | 0 |
February | 0 | 0 | 1 |
March | 0 | 6 | 1 |
April | 3 | 1 | 2 |
May | 5 | 0 | 1 |
January to March | 0 | 7 | 2 |
April or May | 8 | 1 | 3 |
FIGURE 2.
Copies of vapA gene of virulent R. equi per 100 ng of fecal DNA from 21 foals at age 28 days (before intrabronchial [IB] infection) by birth‐month: JFM = January, February, or March; and AM = April or May. Dots are colored by study group: (1) triangles represent control foals that remained healthy after IB infection; (2) squares represent control foals that developed pneumonia after IB infection (n = 8); and 3) circles represent foals that were gavaged with live, virulent R. equi at ages 2 and 4 days (n = 5; none of these foals developed pneumonia). Fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi were significantly lower among foals born before April than for foals born in April or May
4. DISCUSSION
Virulent R. equi are widespread in their environment at horse‐breeding farms, but only a small proportion of foals develop rhodococcal pneumonia. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 Environmental exposure contributes to varying risk of disease. Airborne concentrations of virulent R. equi were higher at Australian Thoroughbred breeding farms that had greater cumulative incidence of R. equi pneumonia, 7 and airborne concentrations of virulent R. equi were higher in stalls of foals that subsequently developed pneumonia in Kentucky and Texas. 10 , 11 These findings are consistent with experimental evidence that IB/intrapulmonary infection of foals with higher numbers of CFU of virulent R. equi induces more frequent and more severe pneumonia. 31 , 32 , 33 But the relationship between natural intraintestinal exposure to virulent R. equi and risk of pneumonia is uncertain. Gavage of newborn foals with large numbers of virulent R. equi has been demonstrated to protect them against subsequent IB infection with virulent R. equi, 15 , 16 and we replicated these findings in 5 foals (for a project investigating immune responses to intragastric administration of virulent R. equi to newborn foals). Foals are known to be coprophagic. 34 , 35 Moreover, they may swallow inhaled or expectorated R. equi. Thus, it is plausible that young foals that ingest large numbers of virulent R. equi from their dam's feces or other environmental exposures are partially or fully immunized against R. equi. We used fecal swabs collected from a convenience sample of foals from ongoing projects to test this hypothesis and found evidence that higher fecal concentrations at age 28 days immediately before IB infection were associated with decreased likelihood of pneumonia both in gavaged foals and healthy control foals. It was not surprising that the foals gavaged with virulent R. equi at age 2 and 4 days were protected against pneumonia and had relatively high fecal concentrations of vapA at age 28 days. To our knowledge, however, these are the first data demonstrating an association between higher fecal concentrations of R. equi associated with lower risk of rhodococcal pneumonia in foals. Although experimental infection of foals offers advantages of controlling crucial conditions of the challenge (eg, age infected and IB infection dose), further testing of this hypothesis under natural conditions is needed. The data reported here substantiate the need for further investigation of the gut‐lung axis in the context of immunity and prevention of rhodococcal pneumonia.
Two weeks after infection, fecal concentrations had increased for pneumonic foals. This is consistent with prior findings that fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi are significantly higher among foals with pneumonia than among foals that remain healthy, including foals with subclinical pneumonia. 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 This has been attributed at least partially to sick foals swallowing large numbers of R. equi in expectorated mucopurulent material. It is also possible that the intestinal microbiota of susceptible foals is more permissive to colonization or replication with virulent R. equi. The fecal concentration of virulent R. equi in the healthy controls rose from a mean of 280 copies/100 ng DNA (95% CI, 29 to 2552 copies/100 ng DNA) before IB infection at age 28 days to a mean of 4116 copies/100 ng DNA (95% CI, 433 to 39 102) at age 42 days, but this nearly 15‐fold increase was not significant (P = .06) and was considerably smaller (>1 order of magnitude) than that for the foals that became sick. This difference might be because the healthy control foals were either not expectorating and swallowing as many R. equi as pneumonic foals or had an intraintestinal environment that was less hospitable for colonization and replication of virulent R. equi than the pneumonic control foals.
The foals that were gavaged with R. equi had a marked decrease in their fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi after IB infection. To our knowledge, this finding has not been reported previously. Thus, it will be important to determine whether this result is reproducible. This finding suggests that intragastric administration of LVRE leads both to clearance of IB infection and to reduction in intraintestinal colonization or replication of virulent R. equi. It is unclear whether this decrease in fecal concentration might occur in foals gavaged with LVRE but that are not infected IB.
Birth‐month, development of pneumonia, and fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi before challenge were coassociated. Foals that were gavaged were nearly evenly distributed between birth‐months of January, February, and March (n = 2) and April or May (n = 3); however, control foals that developed pneumonia were predominately born in January, February, or March (88%; 7/8) whereas healthy control foals were born in April or May (100%; 8/8). Because of this complete separation (ie, all healthy control foals born in April or May) and our small sample size, it was impossible to separate the effects of birth‐month from disease status. Fecal concentrations at age 28 days (before IB infection) were higher among foals born in April or May than earlier months, whether considering all 3 groups of foals or just the 2 groups of control foals (ie, healthy controls versus pneumonic controls). The reason for this association is unknown, but increased density of mares and foals during the later birth‐months might have resulted in higher fecal concentrations of virulent R. equi in the environment of mares and foals. 8 , 18 , 19 Alternatively, the warmer weather in Texas in April and May might have resulted in conditions that favored growth of R. equi in feces and soil. Replication of these findings and further evaluation of questions arising from our results are warranted.
This study had limitations. First, the sample size was small and determined by convenience: we collected fecal samples from foals used for 2 unrelated projects. Future studies should be designed specifically to test the hypotheses examined here; our results provide data for sample size calculations for planning such studies. We used only ultrasonography to characterize pulmonary lesions. Because thoracic ultrasonography cannot penetrate a healthy lung surface, we cannot be certain that some of our healthy foals had subclinical lesions in deeper lung parenchyma which was covered by healthy lung that precluded sonographic detection of lesions. Similarly, we only monitored foals for clinical and hematological signs of disease and ultrasonographic evidence of pneumonia. It is possible that some of the healthy foals with high fecal copy numbers of vapA had extrapulmonary infections such as intra‐abdominal lymphadenitis or enterocolitis. We think the likelihood of this is low because daily clinical examinations and biweekly hematological findings were within reference ranges for healthy control foals, and all healthy control foals were observed to have gained weight each week to a greater extent than pneumonic foals (data not provided). Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of the healthy foals had subclinical extrapulmonary manifestations of R. equi infection. 36 We did not provide evidence to substantiate that 1 copy of vapA represents 1 colony forming unit of R. equi. However, it is generally assumed because of the large size of the plasmid encoding VapA (approximately 85 kb) that each bacterium harbors only a single copy. Fecal samples were collected on a specific day for the gavaged and healthy control foals, but was variable in pneumonic foals. But all pneumonic control foals except 1 had fecal swabs collected between 12 and 16 days after IB infection, and exploratory data analysis (data not shown) did not suggest any association between age of sample collection and fecal concentration of vapA.
In conclusion, higher fecal concentration of virulent R. equi before challenge was associated with protection against IB infection with R. equi. These findings suggest that variability in susceptibility of foals to natural infection might in part be mediated by the numbers of intraintestinal virulent R. equi to which foals ingest from their environment by mechanisms such as coprophagia, pica, or swallowing inhaled or expectorated airborne organisms. After IB infection, fecal concentrations increased markedly in foals that developed pneumonia, and dramatically decreased in foals gavaged with LVRE at age 2 and 4 days. Whether gavage with LVRE results in enhanced clearance of R. equi from both the respiratory and intestinal tracts and the mechanism of this clearance merits further investigation.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
OFF‐LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION
Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.
INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION
This study was approved by the Texas A&M University IACUC and the Clinical Research Review Committee of the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences (Protocols #2020‐0273 and 2020‐0280).
HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION
Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was supported by a grant from Boehringer‐Ingelheim Animal Health Inc (Advancement in Equine Research Award). Additional support was provided by the Link Equine Research Endowment, Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences. The authors thank IDEXX for their donation of SNAP Foal IgG test kits that were used for foals in this study.
Cohen ND, Kahn SK, Bordin AI, et al. Association of pneumonia with concentrations of virulent Rhodococcus equi in fecal swabs of foals before and after intrabronchial infection with virulent R. equi . J Vet Intern Med. 2022;36(3):1139‐1145. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16409
Funding information Boehringer‐Ingelheim Animal Health Inc; Link Equine Research Endowment
Footnotes
[Correction added on 29 Apr 2022, after the first online publication: Acknowledgment section has been updated]
REFERENCES
- 1. Prescott JF. Rhodococcus equi: an animal and human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991;4:20‐34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Takai S. Epidemiology of Rhodococcus equi infections: a review. Vet Microbiol. 1997;56:167‐176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Meijer W, Prescott JF. Rhodococcus equi. Vet Res. 2004;35:383‐386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Giguère S, Hondalus MK, Yager JA, et al. Role of the 85‐kilobase plasmid and plasmid‐encoded virulence‐associated protein A in intracellular survival and virulence of Rhodococcus equi . Infect Immun. 1999;67:3548‐3557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Barton MD, Hughes KL. Ecology of Rhodococcus equi . Vet Microbiol. 1984;9:65‐76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Morton AC, Begg AP, Anderson GA, et al. Epidemiology of Rhodococcus equi strains on Thoroughbred horse farms. Appl Env Microbiol. 2001;67:2167‐2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Muscatello G, Anderson GA, Gilkerson JR, et al. Associations between the ecology of virulent Rhodococcus equi and the epidemiology of R. equi on Australian Thoroughbred farms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:6152‐6160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cohen ND, Carter CN, Scott HM, et al. Association of soil concentrations of Rhodococcus equi and incidence of pneumonia attributable to Rhodococcus equi in foals on farms in Central Kentucky. Am J Vet Res. 2008;69:385‐395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Muscatello G, Gerbaud S, Kennedy C, et al. Comparison of concentrations of Rhodococcus equi and virulent R. equi in air of stables and paddocks on horse breeding farms in a temperate climate. Equine Vet J. 2006;38:263‐265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cohen ND, Chaffin MK, Kuskie KR, et al. Association of perinatal exposure to airborne Rhodococcus equi with risk of pneumonia caused by R equi in foals. Am J Vet Res. 2013;74:102‐109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cohen ND, Kuskie KR, Smith JL, et al. Association of airborne concentration of virulent Rhodococcus equi with location (stall versus paddock) and month (January through June) on 30 horse breeding farms in Central Kentucky. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73:1603‐1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Martens RJ, Takai S, Cohen ND, et al. Association of disease with isolation and virulence of Rhodococcus equi from farm soil and foals with pneumonia. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000;217:220‐225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Grimm MB, Cohen ND, Slovis NM, et al. Evaluation of mares from a Thoroughbred breeding farm as a source of Rhodococcus equi for their foals using quantitative culture and a colony immunoblot assay. Am J Vet Res. 2007;68:63‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Buntain S, Carter C, Kuskie K, et al. Frequency of Rhodococcus equi in feces of mares in Central Kentucky. J Equine Vet Sci. 2010;30:191‐195. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chirino‐Trejo JM, Prescott JF, Yager JA. Protection of foals against experimental Rhodococcus equi pneumonia by oral immunization. Can J Vet Res. 1987;51:444‐447. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hooper‐McGrevy KE, Wilkie BN, Prescott JF. Virulence‐associated protein‐specific serum immunoglobulin G‐isotype expression in young foals protected against Rhodococcus equi pneumonia by oral immunization with virulent R. equi . Vaccine. 2005;23:5760‐5767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chaffin MK, Cohen ND, Martens RJ, et al. Foal‐related risk factors associated with development of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia on farms with endemic infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;223:1791‐1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chaffin MK, Cohen ND, Martens RJ. Evaluation of equine breeding farm management and preventive health practices as risk factors for development of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;222:476‐485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cohen ND, O'Conor M, Chaffin MK, et al. Farm characteristics and management practices associated with the development of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;226:404‐413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sellon DC, Besser TE, Vivrette SL, et al. Comparison of nucleic acid amplification, serology, and microbiologic culture for diagnosis of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1289‐1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shaw SD, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK, et al. Estimating the sensitivity and specificity of real‐time quantitative PCR of fecal samples for diagnosis of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in foals. J Vet Intern Med. 2015;29:1712‐1717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Madrigal RG, Shaw SD, Witkowski LA, et al. Use of serial quantitative PCR of the vapA gene of Rhodococcus equi in feces for early detection of R. equi pneumonia in foals. J Vet Intern Med. 2016;30:664‐670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Takai S, Iimori S, Tsubaki S. Quantitative fecal culture for early diagnosis of Corynebacterium (Rhodococcus) equi enteritis in foals. Can J Vet Res. 1986;50:479‐484. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Takai S, Fujimori T, Katsuzaki K, et al. Ecology of Rhodococcus equi in horses and their environment on horse‐breeding farms. Vet Microbiol. 1987;14:233‐239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Takai S, Ohkura H, Watanabe Y, et al. Quantitative aspects of fecal Rhodococcus (Corynebacterium) equi in foals. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;23:794‐796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Takai S, Takahagi J, Sato Y, et al. Molecular epidemiology of virulent in horses and their environments. In: Nakajima H, Plowright W, eds. Equine Infectious Disease VII. Newmarket: R & W Publications; 1994:183‐187. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Pusterla N, Wilson WD, Mapes S, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of real‐time PCR in the detection of Rhodococcus equi in faeces and nasopharyngeal swabs from foals with pneumonia. Vet Rec. 2007;161:272‐274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Rocha JN, Cohen ND, Bordin AI, et al. Oral administration of electron‐beam inactivated Rhodococcus equi failed to protect foals against intrabronchial infection with live, virulent R. equi . PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cywes‐Bentley C, Rocha JN, Bordin AI, et al. Antibody to poly‐N‐acetyl glucosamine provides protection against intracellular pathogens: mechanism of action and validation in horse foals challenged with Rhodococcus equi . PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bordin AI, Cohen ND, Giguère S, et al. Host‐directed therapy in foals can enhance functional innate immunity and reduce severity of Rhodococcus equi pneumonia. Sci Rep. 2021;11:2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Wada R, Kamada M, Anzai T, et al. Pathogenicity and virulence of Rhodococcus equi in foals following intratracheal challenge. Vet Microbiol. 1997;56:301‐312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Jacks S, Giguère S. Effects of inoculum size on cell‐mediated and humoral immune responses of foals experimentally infected with Rhodococcus equi: a pilot study. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010;133:282‐286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sanz M, Loynachan A, Sun L, et al. The effect of bacterial dose and foal age at challenge on Rhodococcus equi infection. Vet Microbiol. 2013;167:623‐631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Francis‐Smith K, Wood‐Gush DG. Coprophagia as seen in Thoroughbred foals. Equine Vet J. 1977;9:155‐157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Crowell‐Davis SL, Houpt KA. Coprophagy by foals: effect of age and possible functions. Equine Vet J. 1986;17:17‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Reuss SM, Chaffin MK, Cohen ND. Extrapulmonary disorders associated with Rhodococcus equi infection in foals: 150 cases (1987‐2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009;235:855‐863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]