Abstract
OBJECTIVES
The paediatric tracheobronchial inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is a rare disease. Whether limited surgical resection is a feasible surgical approach for these patients remains controversial. The objectives of this study were to report the long-term prognosis after limited surgical resections on paediatric tracheobronchial IMT and provide a surgical management strategy for this rare disease.
METHODS
Paediatric tracheobronchial IMT patients who underwent limited surgical resection from 2012 to 2020 were enrolled in this study. The clinical characteristics, course of treatment and long-term outcomes of all participants were collated. We presented the accumulated data and analysed the feasibility of limited surgical resection on the paediatric tracheobronchial IMT.
RESULTS
A total of 9 children with tracheobronchial IMTs were enrolled in our study. Cough and shortness of breath were the most common symptoms. All 9 participants underwent surgical treatment, including 2 tracheal reconstructions, 4 carinal reconstructions and 3 bronchial sleeve resections. Among the participants, 6/9 (66%) were positive for the anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene in terms of immunohistochemistry. None of the participants died of short-term complications. The follow-up period was 5.4 (range, 1.1–9.3) years, during which all participants remained well.
CONCLUSIONS
Limited surgical resection is preferred for paediatrics with tracheobronchial IMTs. Meanwhile, patients with complete resection have an excellent long-term prognosis.
Keywords: Tracheobronchial inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, Paediatric, The long-term prognosis
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is an uncommon disease.
INTRODUCTION
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is an uncommon disease. It is typically considered a low-grade malignant, locally invasive malignant tumour with a low recurrence and metastasis rate [1]. Paediatric tracheobronchial IMT is exceedingly rare, and experience in treating paediatric tracheobronchial IMT is lacking. Complete lung function is significant for children's growth and quality of life. Surgical resection for IMT includes even pneumonectomy to prevent a recurrence. However, these surgical approaches entail an excessive loss of lung parenchyma and may lead to severe complications. Limited surgical resection is a set of surgical approaches, which remove the lesion and preserve more pulmonary parenchyma, including tracheal reconstruction, carinal reconstruction, bronchial sleeve resection and sleeve lobectomy. At present, studies about paediatric tracheobronchial IMT with limited surgical resections have mostly been case reports [2, 3]. We aimed to elucidate whether limited surgical resection can also prevent recurrence and achieve long-term survival. This study collected 9 patients with tracheobronchial IMT with limited surgical resections. The objectives of this study were to present the long-term prognosis after limited surgical resections on paediatric tracheobronchial IMT and provide a surgical management strategy for this rare disease.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This retrospective series report recruited consecutive 9 paediatric tracheobronchial IMT patients with limited surgical resection from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Shanghai Chest Hospital in China between 2012 and 2020. The clinical characteristics and preliminary diagnosis of all participants were recorded. Participants underwent preoperative pulmonary computed tomography (CT) scan. The majority underwent preoperative bronchoscopic biopsy. None of the participants received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. Preparation before intubation includes selecting a double lumen tube with appropriate model and direction, checking the inflation/deflation of bronchial and tracheal inflation cuff, preparing a special Y-connector and connecting double lumen and ventilation system. Intubation requires a skilled direct visual laryngoscope (lifting the epiglottis) to expose the throat fully. The left double-lumen tube also needs to rotate 90° clockwise to place the front end at an angle in the correct position. Once the double-lumen tube passes through the throat, pull out the tube core and push the double-lumen tube to the lower part of the trachea to make the bronchial tube enter the correct bronchus. One patient with a tumour located in the middle trachea and one with a tumour located in the lower trachea received VATS tracheal reconstruction via the right approach and the sternal approach, respectively (Fig. 1A). Three patients with tumours located at the distal left main bronchus underwent sleeve lobectomy or bronchial sleeve resection (Fig. 1B and C). Four patients with tumours involving the carina and proximal bronchus underwent carina reconstructions (Fig. 1D). The resection margin was 5 mm away from the lesion. The result of the frozen section determined extended resection. They used the suspension wire to test the anastomotic tension and select the angle and method of anastomosis. The anastomosis was continuously sutured by polydioxanone plus 4–0 and then intermittently sutured by Vicryl 4–0 for reinforcement. Postoperatively, the whole tumour specimen was histologically evaluated, and the final diagnosis was determined by the paraffin section. Pathologists provide all reports regarding histological diagnoses (Fig. 2). Participants were followed up by the outpatients at the first 6 months and annually after surgery. The last follow-up was performed by telephone.
Figure 1:

Different tumour locations and their corresponding limited surgical resection methods. (A) Tracheal reconstruction. (B) Bronchial sleeve resection. (C) Sleeve lobectomy. (D) Carinal reconstruction.
Figure 2:
Surgery pictures. (A) Visual laryngoscope for paediatric. (B) Tracheal intubation cannula for paediatric. (C) Surgical approaches. (D) Sleeve lobectomy. (E) Lesion specimen. (F) Pathological picture. LLL: left lower lobe; LMB: left main bronchi; PA: pulmonary artery.
Carinal reconstruction technique
There were 4 patients with tumours involving the carinal and proximal bronchus underwent carinal reconstructions. Tissue around the trachea was fully released, and the incision was made 5 mm from the upper and lower edges of the lesion. Right main bronchus were resected 5 mm from the orifice. The lower part of the trachea and the left main bronchus were suspended respectively, and the artificial carina was formed by continuous suture. The excess tissue of the artificial carina was trimmed. After that, the right main bronchi and the gap were continuously sutured. The anastomoses were sutured interruptedly for reinforcement.
Ethics statement
This study was permitted by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (2020K43). Since this was a retrospective study and all participants were anonymous, individual informed consent was waived.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using the SPSS software version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were expressed by median and interquartile range (IQR), since it was not in a normal distribution. Categorical variables were expressed by absolute frequencies.
RESULTS
A total of 9 patients with tracheobronchial IMTs were enrolled in our study. There was no gender difference in our cases, with 4 male patients and 5 female patients. The median age was 12 (IQR, 9–13) years old. The median height and weight were 144 (IQR, 128–156) cm and 39 (IQR, 25–44) kg, respectively. The symptoms were varied as determined by the specific location of the lesion. Among the 9 participants, the most common symptoms were cough (6/9, 66.7%) and shortness of breath (6/9, 66.7%). Other local symptoms included dyspnoea (5/9, 55.6%), chest distress (5/9, 55.6%), chest pain (3/9, 33.3%) and haemoptysis (1/9, 11.1%). Besides the local specific symptoms, some common systemic symptoms were observed, including fever (2/9, 22.2%). The median time of symptomatic onset to diagnosis was 30 (IQR, 21–45) days.
In terms of the preoperative CT scans, patients presented as atelectasis (4/9, 44.4%), lung infection (5/9, 55.6%), pleural effusion (4/9, 44.4%) and airway obstruction (5/9, 55.6%). Of the 9 participants, 8 (8/9, 88.9%) underwent preoperative bronchoscopy and 5 of 8 (62.5%) were initially diagnosed with IMT (Table 1).
Table 1:
Patient characteristics
| Case No. | Age (years), sex | Height (cm), weight (kg) | Symptoms | Imaging characteristics | Tumour location, size (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7, M | 128, 21.1 | CD, CP, SB | LI, PE, atelectasis | Distal LMB, 3 |
| 2 | 15, M | 160, 39 | C, D, P, CP CD, SB, fever | LI, PE, atelectasis | Carina + proximal LMB, 3 |
| 3 | 10, M | 140, 26 | C, H | No | Carina + proximal RMB, 2 |
| 4 | 9, F | 127, 24 | C, P, CD, CP, SB | LI, PE, atelectasis | Distal LMB, 2.5 |
| 5 | 16, F | 144, 42 | D, P, SB | No | Trachea, mid, 1.9 |
| 6 | 6, M | 125, 25 | C, D, P, CD, SB, fever | LI | Trachea, low, 1 |
| 7 | 12, F | 153, 44 | C, D | No | Carina + proximal LMB, 2.5 |
| 8 | 13, F | 156, 45 | C, P | No | Carina + proximal LMB, 1.5 |
| 9 | 13, F | 160, 65 | D, CD, SB | LI, PE, atelectasis | Distal LMB, 3.4 |
| Median | 12 | 144, 39 | 2.5 |
C: cough; CD: chest distress; CP: chest pain; D: dyspnoea; F: female; H: haemoptysis; SB: shortness of breath; LI: lung infection; LMB: left main bronchi; M: male; mid: middle; no.: number; P: palpitation; PE: pleural effusion; RMB: right main bronchi.
None of the participants received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. All 9 participants underwent surgical treatment. Two participants with tracheal tumour received tracheal reconstructions. Four participants with tumours involving the carina and proximal main bronchus underwent carinal reconstructions. Two participants with main bronchial tumour extending to the opening of lobar bronchus received sleeve lobectomies. One participant with main bronchial tumour not involving with the opening of lobar bronchus underwent bronchial sleeve resection. The median tumour diameter was 2.5 (IQR, 1.9–3) cm. Tumour-free surgical margin was recorded in 8 participants.
The CT scans and bronchoscopy examinations of each participant were evaluated after surgery. Postoperative complications (5/9, 55.6%) included postoperative atelectasis (4/9, 44.4%), empyema (1/9, 11.1%) and lung infection (3/9, 33.3%). After surgery, the median hospital stay was 13 (IQR, 10–14) days. None of the participants died of short-term complications.
The follow-up data were available for 5.4 (IQR, 4.5–6.5) years, during which time all participants remained well. None of the participants received adjuvant therapy after surgery. All participants underwent postoperative CT scans and bronchoscopy examinations on time. A case suspected of a local recurrence after the operation and underwent bronchoscopic tumour resection and airway dilation. This patient did not recur again and was still alive at the last follow-up (Table 2).
Table 2:
Surgery and follow-up information
| Case no. | Approach | Surgical technique | Blood loss (ml) | Hospital stay (days) | Margin | Recurrence | Survival (years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Left VATS | LUL sleeve lobectomy | 50 | 10 | R0 | No | 1.1, alive |
| 2 | Left thoracotomy | Carinal reconstruction | 150 | 9 | R0 | No | 4.5, alive |
| 3 | Left VATS | Carinal reconstruction | 30 | 13 | R0 | No | 4.5, alive |
| 4 | Left VATS | LMB sleeve resection | 30 | 16 | R0 | No | 5.4, alive |
| 5 | Sternotomy VATS | Tracheal reconstruction | 5 | 14 | R0 | No | 8.6, alive |
| 6 | Right VATS | Tracheal reconstruction | 50 | 13 | R0 | No | 9.3, alive |
| 7 | Right VATS | Carinal reconstruction | 700 | 44 | R0 | No | 5.4, alive |
| 8 | Right Thoracotomy | Carinal reconstruction | 100 | 11 | R1 | Yes | 6.5, alive |
| 9 | Left Thoracotomy | LUL sleeve lobectomy | 200 | 5 | R0 | No | 3.3, alive |
| Median | 50 | 14 | 5.4 |
LMB: left main bronchus; LUL: left upper lobe; no.: number; R0: microscopically and macroscopically margin-negative; R1: macroscopically margin-negative, but microscopically margin-positive; RMB: right main bronchus; VATS: video-assisted thoracoscopic.
The pathological specimens were checked by 2 experienced pathologists. All participants were confirmed with tracheobronchial IMTs. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) of the postoperative pathological specimens were analysed, and the results were as follows: 6/9 (66%) was positive for the anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK), 9/9 (100%) were positive for vimentin and 7/9 (77.8%) were positive for alpha-smooth muscle actin. Seven patients had S-100 positive (7/9, 77.8%), while only 2 and 3 patients had positive desmin (2/9, 22.2%) and CD34 (3/8, 27.5%). None of their samples expressed CK in this series (Table 3).
Table 3:
Characteristics of immunohistochemistry
| Case no. | Vimentin | ALK | SMA | Desmin | S-100 | CD34 | CK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | – |
| 2 | + | + | − | − | − | + | − |
| 3 | + | + | + | − | + | − | − |
| 4 | + | + | + | − | + | N/A | − |
| 5 | + | − | + | + | + | − | − |
| 6 | + | − | + | − | + | − | − |
| 7 | + | − | + | − | + | + | − |
| 8 | + | + | + | − | + | − | − |
| 9 | + | + | − | − | − | − | − |
| Positive rate (%) | 100 | 66 | 77.8 | 22.2 | 77.8 | 37.5 | 0 |
N/A: not available; no.: number; SMA: smooth muscle actin.
DISCUSSION
The first report of IMT was by Brunn in 1939, and it was named in 1954 in accordance with its propensity to clinically and radiologically mimic a malignant process [4]. It is a low-grade malignant tumour that originated from soft tissue, which predates paediatrics, and mainly grows in the lung. Paediatric tracheobronchial IMT is extremely rare. Available articles about the paediatric tracheobronchial IMT cohort are limited, and most are case reports. This study is a retrospective observational analysis of paediatric tracheobronchial IMT and provides a detailed overview of patients’ clinical characteristics, auxiliary examinations, treatment history and long-term prognosis.
Paediatric tracheobronchial IMT presents with non-specific symptoms. The initial symptoms of patients in this study were mainly cough, dyspnoea, shortness of breath, chest pain and fever. The period of onset to admission was generally short, and no patients were reported to have distant metastases. Therefore, paediatric tracheobronchial IMT may be more amenable to be completely resected at an earlier stage. Given its non-specific symptoms and rare characteristics, the paediatric tracheobronchial IMT is still more likely to be misdiagnosed. Patients were previously misdiagnosed as pneumonia in this study or asthma in other cases [4]. Therefore, we suggest that children who experience unexplained respiratory symptoms or fever and have no response to treatment should be referred to further examinations, including radiology and bronchoscopy, and tracheobronchial IMT should be aware of.
The diagnosis of paediatric tracheobronchial IMT is based on radiology and histology. When the patients are suspected of tracheobronchial IMT, CT scan is highly suggested. Tracheobronchial masses and unspecific imaging findings such as atelectasis, lung infection and pleural effusion can be observed in the CT images of paediatric tracheobronchial IMTs. CT outcomes are conducive to defining the tumour anatomical location but not for diagnostic validation, for which further pathological examination is necessary. The typical pathological characteristic of IMT is the proliferation of spindle cells, surrounded by inflammatory cells such as plasma cells, lymphocytes or eosinophils [5]. A part of paediatric tracheobronchial IMT can be diagnosed by bronchoscopic pathological outcomes, and it is easier to obtain effective pathological tissues with a rigid one [6]. Obtaining a small tissue sample for frozen sections would make pathological diagnosis difficult [7]. Meanwhile, as a low-grade malignant tumour without obvious malignant tumour characteristics, the frozen section usually shows no evidence of malignancy. Thus, sometimes the outcomes of frozen surgical sections are negative, but the surgical paraffin section is positive. The postoperative surgical paraffin section is the most reliable evidence to confirm the diagnosis. Our study reported a case as tumour-free margin according to the frozen surgical sections, but with an opposite outcome in light of the paraffin section [8]. Such an opposite outcome may lead to incomplete resection. IHC is helpful in the differential diagnosis. The ALK is one of the special indicators for IMT and >50% of IMT patients are IHC ALK positive [9]. The ALK-positive rate in our study was even higher and reached 75%. More and more ALK fusion genes were discovered in recent years, such as EML4-ALK, TPM3-ALK and PPFIBP1-ALK [10–12]. A positive ALK provides an additional option for treatment. Positive ROS1 gene and RET gene expressions have also been reported [13, 14]. The ALK also has certain significance in suggesting disease metastasis and prognosis [15].
Surgical resection is the mainstay for paediatric tracheobronchial IMT. In clinical practice, lobectomy or pneumonectomy that expands the extent of resection can prevent recurrence but have relatively high morbidity and mortality [16]. Compared with lobectomy or pneumonectomy, limited surgical resection preserves more lung parenchyma [17]. Limited surgical resections include tracheal reconstruction, carinal reconstruction, sleeve lobectomy and bronchial sleeve resection. The purpose of limited resection is to achieve a negative surgical margin and preserve more lung function. Reports of limited surgical resections on paediatric tracheobronchial IMT are rare [18, 19]. In our study, all participants underwent limited surgical resection in our study, with small amounts of intraoperative blood loss without short-term postoperative complications. From our experience, the airway tumour surgical margin can be considered tumour-free when it is 5 mm above and below the tumour. Paediatric airway reconstruction is challenging because children have small chest cavities and fragile bronchial systems. As for the surgical technique, delicate handling of tissue is required to minimize scars and strictures. The use of a small-sized thoracoscope for surgery can enable a clearer surgical field of vision. The minimally invasive surgical method enables enhanced recovery. Reducing anastomotic tension is of vital significance for children. Experiments have shown that the amount of tension on tracheal suture lines tolerated by puppies was only 58% of that tolerated by adult dogs [20]. Anastomotic laceration can cause acute dyspnoea and, in severe cases, even lead to death. Dyspnoea caused by anastomotic stenosis is another problem in airway reconstruction. Before suturing, we will use thread to tie both airway ends for a test pull. Through the pull thread, the tension on both sides can be felt to adjust the angle of the anastomosis and the length of the resection. The airway diameter of children is smaller than that of adults, and small scars can cause severe stenosis. Absorbable sutures should be used for airway sutures during surgery to reduce the possibility of anastomotic stenosis. Polydioxanone plus suture which was absorbable and antibiotic was applied to the suture of the trachea and bronchus in our participants. The continuous sutures can reduce the granulation tissue formation, and the reinforcement of intermittent sutures can reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. Thus, continuous sutures combined with intermittent sutures were used to minimize the possibility of anastomosis complications. Postoperative management of airway reconstruction is very important. Patients should be closely monitored, and complications should be detected in time. It is feasible to apply limited surgical resection in children with experienced surgeons and careful surveillance.
The adjuvant treatment of paediatric tracheobronchial IMT is mainly used for patients unwilling to receive surgery with incomplete resection or recurrence. The adjuvant treatment includes targeted therapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Crizotinib has been proved effective in treating ALK-positive IMT.[21, 22] The IMT patients with ROS1 positive also responded to crizotinib. Chemotherapy has more side effects than targeted therapy and is uncommonly used in IMT patients [23]; however, chemotherapy can be used as a treatment option for patients regardless of their gene condition. Local radiotherapy, which has few systematic side effects, can be considered when patients are unwilling to receive surgery or systemic treatment [24]. Since no official management or guidelines are available, participants in our study did not receive postoperative adjuvant therapy. According to our observation, paediatric tracheobronchial IMT receiving complete resection has an excellent prognosis even without postoperative adjuvant treatment.
We completely resected 8 tracheobronchial IMTs without adjuvant therapy, and none of the participants died or had a local recurrence in the follow-up. Previous studies have suggested that the 5-year survival rate of IMT undergoing complete resection is as high as 91% [25]. The prognosis of paediatric tracheobronchial IMT with complete surgical resection is excellent and has low recurrence rates. Only 1 participant with incomplete excision developed local recurrence in this study. This patient was diagnosed as recurrence with tracheal stenosis. After tumour excision combined with airway dilation, this patient recovered and did not relapse until the last follow-up. Although complete surgical resection is the best way to treat IMT, the risks of surgery should be heeded. Experienced doctors must perform paediatric tracheobronchial surgery and be closely monitored after the operation. CT scan can show well-defined endo-tracheobronchial mass. It is less time-consuming and cheap. We recommended CT scans at the first 6 months and annually after surgery. Bronchoscopy should be performed after any positive CT finding (Fig. 3).
Figure 3:
Computed tomographic image of case number 3 in this study. (A) Preoperative computed tomographic image (coronal view). (B) Preoperative computed tomographic image (axial view). (C) Postoperative computed tomographic image (coronal view). (D) Postoperative computed tomographic image (axial view).
Limitations
There were some limitations in this study. First of all, participants did not receive postoperative spirometry to quantify the evaluation of pulmonary function. However, it is easy to understand that more lung pulmonary parenchyma preserved means better lung function and quality of life. Unfortunately, it was a retrospective study lacking a control group. Hence, a prospective study with a control group should be considered in future studies.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, tracheobronchial IMTs should be suspected in any paediatric patients presenting with tracheobronchial mass and unexplained respiratory symptoms. Limited surgical resection by an experienced surgeon is the preferred treatment for paediatric tracheobronchial IMT to prevent unavoidable pneumonectomy or lobectomy. After complete resection, prognosis is excellent and recurrence is rare.
Glossary
ABBREVIATIONS
- CT
Computed tomography
- IHC
Immunohistochemistry
- IMT
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour
- IQR
Interquartile range
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
Data Available Statement
All data generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.
Author contributions
Junguo Dong: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Project administration; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. Diego Gonzalez-Rivas: Conceptualization; Investigation; Project administration; Supervision; Writing—review & editing. Pengcheng Lv: Data curation; Formal analysis; Project administration; Writing—original draft. Zhexin Wang: Data curation; Project administration; Writing—original draft. Jiaxi He: Writing—review & editing. Feng Yao: Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Supervision; Validation; Writing—review & editing. Shuben Li: Conceptualization; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Supervision; Validation; Writing—review & editing.
Reviewer information
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery thanks Mohammad Behgam Shadmehr, Stefano Bongiolatti and the other, anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review process of this article.
REFERENCES
- 1. Dalton BG, Thomas PG, Sharp NE, Manalang MA, Fisher JE, Moir CR et al Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors in children. J Pediatr Surg 2016. ;51:541–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kumar N, Saravanamuthu T, Srinivasan A, Raman T, Scott JX.. Pediatric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the airway: two case reports with varying clinical presentation. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol 2018. ;30:171–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Akhtar MI, Junejo F, Naqvi HI, Hamid M.. Manual trans-tracheal high frequency positive pressure ventilation for left main bronchus and carinal mass surgical resection in a child. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2017. ;27:S68–S70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Umiker WO, Iverson L.. Postinflammatory tumors of the lung; report of four cases simulating xanthoma, fibroma, or plasma cell tumor. J Thorac Surg 1954;28:55–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Jindal A, Bal A, Agarwal R.. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the trachea in the pediatric age group: case report and systematic review of the literature. J Bronchol Interv Pulmonol 2015. ;22:58–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD.. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2007. ;31:509–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lee HJ, Kim JS, Choi YS, Kim K, Shim YM, Han J. et al. Treatment of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the chest: the extent of resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007. ;84:221–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Thistlethwaite PA, Renner J, Duhamel D, Makani S, Lin GY, Jamieson SW. et al. Surgical management of endobronchial inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 2011. ;91:367–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP.. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:859–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Butrynski JE, D'Adamo DR, Hornick JL, Dal Cin P, Antonescu CR, Jhanwar SC. et al. Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1727–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sokai A, Enaka M, Sokai R, Mori S, Mori S, Gunji M. et al. Pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor harboring EML4-ALK fusion gene. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014;44:93–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kinoshita Y, Tajiri T, Ieiri S, Nagata K, Taguchi T, Suita S. et al. A case of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in the lung which expressed TPM3-ALK gene fusion. Pediatr Surg Int 2007;23:595–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Takeuchi K, Soda M, Togashi Y, Sugawara E, Hatano S, Asaka R. et al. Pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor expressing a novel fusion, PPFIBP1-ALK: reappraisal of anti-ALK immunohistochemistry as a tool for novel ALK fusion identification. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:3341–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hornick JL, Sholl LM, Dal Cin P, Childress MA, Lovly CM.. Expression of ROS1 predicts ROS1 gene rearrangement in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Mod Pathol 2015;28:732–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Antonescu CR, Suurmeijer AJ, Zhang L, Sung YS, Jungbluth AA, Travis WD. et al. Molecular characterization of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors with frequent ALK and ROS1 gene fusions and rare novel RET rearrangement. Am J Surg Pathol 2015;39:957–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Blyth DF, Buckels NJ, Sewsunker R, Soni MA.. Pneumonectomy in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:587–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bagan P, Le Pimpec-Barthes F, Badia A, Crockett F, Dujon A, Riquet M.. Bronchial sleeve resections: lung function resurrecting procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;34:484–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hoseok I, Joungho H, Ahn KM, Lee SI, Jhingook K.. Complete surgical resection of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with carinal reconstruction in a 4-year-old boy. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:e23–e25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Genchellac H, Kirici MY, Basaran UN, Karamustafaoglu YA, Cagli B, Tastekin E.. Successful sleeve lobectomy of pediatric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Pediatr Int 2016;58:1087–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Gaissert HA, Mathisen DJ, Grillo HC, Vacanti JP, Wain JC.. Tracheobronchial sleeve resection in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:192–7, discussion 197-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mossé YP, Voss SD, Lim MS, Rolland D, Minard CG, Fox E. et al. Targeting ALK with crizotinib in pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a children's oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3215–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Theilen TM, Soerensen J, Bochennek K, Becker M, Schwabe D, Rolle U. et al. Crizotinib in ALK+ inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors—current experience and future perspectives. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018;65:e26920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Casanova M, Brennan B, Alaggio R, Kelsey A, Orbach D, van Noesel MM. et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: the experience of the European pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). Eur J Cancer 2020;127:123–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lisi R, Abate G, D'Urso P, Martinetti MT, Siniscalchi B, Marampon F. et al. Successful role of adjuvant radiotherapy in a rare case of tracheal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a case report. Tumori 2019;105:NP1–NP3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Nascimento AG, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Miller DL. et al. Inflammatory pseudotumors of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:933–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



