Skip to main content
Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences logoLink to Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences
. 2022 May 23;380(2227):20200423. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0423

Protometabolism as out-of-equilibrium chemistry

Serge Nader 1, Lorenzo Sebastianelli 1, Sheref S Mansy 1,
PMCID: PMC9125230  PMID: 35599565

Abstract

It is common to compare life with machines. Both consume fuel and release waste to run. In biology, the engine that drives the living system is referred to as metabolism. However, attempts at deciphering the origins of metabolism do not focus on this energetic relationship that sustains life but rather concentrate on nonenzymatic reactions that produce all the intermediates of an extant metabolic pathway. Such an approach is akin to studying the molecules produced from the burning of coal instead of deciphering how the released energy drives the movement of pistons and ultimately the train when investigating the mechanisms behind locomotion. Theories that do explicitly invoke geological chemical gradients to drive metabolism most frequently feature hydrothermal vent conditions, but hydrothermal vents are not the only regions of the early Earth that could have provided the fuel necessary to sustain the Earth's first (proto)cells. Here, we give examples of prior reports on protometabolism and highlight how more recent investigations of out-of-equilibrium systems may point to alternative scenarios more consistent with the majority of prebiotic chemistry data accumulated thus far.

This article is part of the theme issue ‘Emergent phenomena in complex physical and socio-technical systems: from cells to societies’.

Keywords: protometabolism, out-of-equilibrium, dissipative systems, origins of life, prebiotic chemistry

1. Protometabolism

What makes chemistry metabolic is the ability to sustain a living cell, which means that chemistry prior to the emergence of life cannot be described as metabolic. Nevertheless, extant metabolic chemistry must have had progenitors, and it is this set of chemical reactions that existed before the transition to biology that is frequently referred to as protometabolism. However, the term has been used loosely, and we would argue in a way that clouds our understanding of the emergence of life. The chemistry that sustains life is complex with many pathways and components integrated together within a highly organized compartment that defies thermodynamic equilibrium. Narrow investigations of individual synthetic pathways in isolation and in absence of a compartment will likely be less informative than, as Ruiz-Mirazo et al. [1,2] argue, systems level approaches that search for commonalities and synergies between chemistries and phases that could help to explain why life is as it is today.

Extant metabolism consists of both catabolic and anabolic reactions, i.e. the breakdown and synthesis of molecules, respectively. The exergonic chemistry of catabolism drives the endergonic reactions of anabolism that are needed to sustain the cell. But, this is not a one-way process where anabolism relies on catabolism alone. The products of anabolism are needed to mediate and regulate catabolism. The current search for separate prebiotic analogues of extant anabolic and catabolic chemistries largely does not address this critical feature of biology, which is how prebiotic systems chemistry gave rise to a mixture of reactions that tie together in a way that defies equilibrium. Such primordial reaction networks that join endergonic with exergonic pathways, ideally through common currencies, as discussed below, would in our estimation be better described as protometabolic in comparison to narrower investigations of nonenzymatic mimics of extant catabolism or anabolism in isolation.

2. Prebiotic analogues of anabolism

Much effort has centred on prebiotic mimics of anabolism whereby plausible routes towards the synthesis of the building blocks of life are deciphered. What has been more contentious is whether these prebiotic reaction pathways resembled modern-day metabolism or were often distinct, reflecting the different constraints imposed by an ancient, prebiotic environment [36]. Both arguments invoke the ability of enzymes to facilitate but not invent chemistry, and both tend to rely on laboratory approximations of reactions under thermodynamic, as opposed to kinetic, control. Proponents of prebiotic chemistry unconstrained by extant biology find it unsurprising that biological reactions can be run nonenzymatically, particularly when subjected to extremes in temperature or pH. Activation energy barriers can be traversed without enzymes, so it would be more surprising if the reaction could not proceed at all. Therefore, observing an uncontrolled nonenzymatic analogue of extant metabolism may tell us little about the role of such chemistry in the origins of life, particularly if metabolism requires regulatory processes that are not easily obtainable without enzymes. Conversely, if a reaction can run nonenzymatically, why would it not? A functioning reaction cycle from which the building blocks of life can be derived is attractive as the emergence of modern-day metabolism could be envisaged to proceed by the stepwise addition of enzymes [7,8]. As with most arguments, reality likely does not fit cleanly into a single category. Just as the RNA world hypothesis gives the most compelling explanation for the rise of Darwinian evolution, it is naive to think that life began with RNA alone. Similarly, while the abundance of biological molecules that can be synthesized from cyanide prebiotically [9] cannot be ignored, it stands to reason that at least some prebiotic reactions were similar to contemporary biological analogues [10].

Although differences in opinion are healthy, particularly when subjected to experimental evaluation, opinions that lead to the imposition of poorly supported rigid constraints are unhelpful. Since we do not know the conditions that gave rise to life, we are left with the realities of chemical reactivity and geological plausibility. A path between nonenzymatic prebiotic chemistry that resembles extant biological pathways and the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) is easy to imagine, which leads many to confidently extrapolate back in time from our best guesses as to what LUCA looked like [11]. However, if such an approach is taken at the exclusion of a broader investigation of what prebiotically plausible molecules give rise to, then we are likely to be led astray. As others have argued before, the early steps leading to life may have been erased by time and thus cannot be easily perceived from extant artefacts [4,9]. Phylogeny can tell us much about the early evolution of life, but it is not logical to allow the genetics of a highly complex organism with 300–400 genes [12,13] dictate how chemistry prior to genetics must have proceeded. Ultimately, a thorough testing of different chemical scenarios congruent with geology is needed so that experimental data and hypotheses can be compared and evaluated [14].

Regardless of the vantage point, what works on prebiotic analogues of anabolism have in common is an attempt to understand how larger biological molecules could have been synthesized prebiotically from smaller, abundant chemical resources. Although there were early, important studies on the prebiotic synthesis of biological molecules [15,16], modern work applies knowledge of synthetic organic chemistry to reactions in water or at the air–water interface [17], under prebiotically plausible conditions. As CO2 was more abundant on the prebiotic Earth, and as the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway (or the reductive acetyl-coenzyme A pathway) has been hypothesized to have been exploited by LUCA, CO2 often features as a carbon source for the synthesis of more complex molecules. Metallic iron or precipitates of metal ions under a variety of conditions have been found to reduce CO2 to formate, methanol, methane, acetate and pyruvate [1821]. Metal ions are further invoked for the catalysis of several steps of an abiotic reductive citric acid cycle, which can be coupled to the synthesis of alanine [22]. Alternatively, glycolate can be synthesized from CO2 and in the presence of UV light and sulfite without the participation of metals [23]. Further irradiation of the glycolate with sulfite produces several components of the citric acid cycle, including citrate, malate and succinate [23]. Metal-free reactions between pyruvate and glyoxylate can also lead to a prebiotic analogue of the reductive citric acid cycle and produce amino acids via transamination with glycine [24]. Conversely, if one considers the rich chemistry of the planetary abundant cyanide [2527], particularly in the presence of UV light, metal ions and reductants such as sulfite, then over half of the 20 amino acids [28,29], pyrimidine and purine ribonucleotides [3033] and precursors to lipids [29] can all be built by photoreductive homologation pathways orthogonal to that of extant biology. Although we favour the robust non-biological-like routes to the synthesis of the building blocks of life, and it is important to directly compare published data from different perspectives [3], the intent here is not to promote or diminish one perspective but to highlight that several paths have been published for the synthesis of the building blocks and that these pathways often give rise to and consume pyruvate and other α-ketoacids.

3. Prebiotic analogues of catabolism

Surprisingly, less effort has been expended in investigating prebiotic mimics of catabolism. Metabolic intermediates, such as glucose-6-phosphate, have been shown to break down to pyruvate in the presence of Fe2+ at elevated temperatures in a manner reminiscent of glycolysis [34]. Similar conditions lead to both the synthesis and degradation of the intermediates of the citric acid cycle when starting from pyruvate and glyoxylate [35]. The reaction pathway can be exploited to synthesize amino acids if hydroxylamine and metallic iron are added [35]. Non-metal-dependent catabolic-like pathways have also been described. An analogue of glycolysis starting from the simple sugar glyceraldehyde gives rise to a series of reactions that generate phosphoenolpyruvate and pyruvate when fed with cyanide, the phosphorylating agent diamidophosphate [36] and glycoaldehyde [37]. Additionally, two interconnecting reaction networks, referred to as the 4-hydroxy-2-ketoglutarate and malonate cycles, that function as a type of prebiotic analogue of the citric acid cycle are sustained by feeding with pyruvate, glyoxylate and hydrogen peroxide [38]. Here, reaction intermediates can be syphoned off to synthesize aspartate in the presence of ammonia [38]. As with the prebiotic analogues of anabolic reactions, the published prebiotic analogues of catabolic networks frequently feature pyruvate and other α-ketoacids.

The aforementioned work demonstrates what types of reactions and molecules were potentially chemically accessible on the prebiotic Earth. Such research is critically important, because knowing what was present addresses what types of protocells could have formed. However, the ingredients of life alone are not enough to make a living cell. If that were so, then we would be able to take apart and put back together a living cell. Further, metabolism is more dissimilar to laboratory-based synthesis than is often appreciated. Scientists are skilled at manipulating thermodynamics and reactivity to push reactions forward, but metabolism does not solely rely on such direct manipulations of chemistry. Instead, metabolism elegantly ties the two branches (i.e. anabolic and catabolic) together through an intermediary process that deposits, stores and spends energy to sustain a vast array of endergonic chemistry (figure 1). That is, life-as-we-know-it plugs into a fuel source with a wire of molecules that consecutively transfers electrons [39]. The molecules that engage in electron transfer most commonly include metallocofactors, ribodinucleotides and quinones. The fuel can be reduced organic molecules, such as sugars and lipids, or inorganic molecules, such as molecular hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide and ferrous ions. The thermodynamically favourable flux of electrons through the cell is coupled to processes that store the released energy into common currencies. This is a key invention of biology [39] and is distinct from the more direct coupling that is typically used in prebiotic chemical studies. In biology, the common currencies consist of H+ gradients, Na+ gradients and adenosine triphosphate, which are used by the cell to pay for the costly work of manufacturing and repairing cellular infrastructure [39]. What is unclear is whether such regulated fluxes of energy that are used to keep cellular systems out-of-equilibrium emerged early or were a later invention.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Extant metabolism works, in part, by funnelling the energy released from the oxidative degradation of varied fuel sources into common currencies, which are then used to drive the energetically costly reductive synthetic processes needed to sustain the cell.

The concept of life being a by-product of dissipating energy gradients is not new [40]. Others have eloquently discussed the potential chemiosmotic [41] origins of life, and how geological gradients could have given rise to the Earth's first cells [42]. Broadly speaking, such hypotheses tend to place the origins of life at hydrothermal vents, which is in contrast to more genetic centric work, such as the RNA world hypothesis, which has favoured surface conditions. Although both perspectives may focus on syntheses starting from different carbon sources (carbon dioxide versus hydrogen cyanide) and with a bigger or smaller role of metal ions, in a narrow sense, there is commonality in that both frequently seek to delineate how the building blocks of life were made. The deeper difference between the two perspectives concerns the placement of metabolism within a timeline encompassing the emergence of the Earth's first cells (figure 2). In other words, were the building blocks of life synthesized by a protometabolic system prior to the emergence of a protocell (figure 2a) or did the building blocks accumulate by distinct chemistry before the advent of protometabolism (figure 2b)? Thus far, much more experimental work has been carried out on chemistry congruent with surface conditions where the building blocks could have accumulated [3,4345]; however, studies have recently begun to investigate the plausibility of hydrothermal vent scenarios guided by the presumption of an earlier appearance of protometabolism [20,46,47]. While we appreciate some aspects of the hydrothermal vent theories, such as the role of metal ions, including iron-sulfur clusters [48,49], and the emphasis on energetics, hydrothermal vents are not the only places capable of providing an energy source.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Comparing timelines of early life innovations. (a) A generic representation of hydrothermal vent scenarios where a constant influx of energy and matter through porous rock sustains prebiotic analogues of metabolism. Over time, the system evolves, generating biopolymers and other molecular machinery before an escape event that leads to encapsulation within a lipid vesicle. (b) A generic representation of the surface of the early Earth where building blocks assemble preferentially within lipid vesicles. This spatial isolation imposes a selective pressure that gives rise to protocells supported by an internal chemistry. (Online version in colour.)

4. Non-hydrothermal vent, out-of-equilibrium processes

Living cells are out-of-equilibrium chemical systems that harness the dissipation of fuel sources to maintain their highly ordered state (figure 3). The persistence of these metastable, out-of-equilibrium arrangements is also known as dynamic kinetic stability [5052], which is at times additionally referred to as dynamic self-assembly when describing chemical systems without biological components [53]. Attempts to construct chemical systems that imitate features of life tend to focus on mimicking three different facets of life-as-we-know-it as opposed to building an integrated protocell, including (i) error-prone replication capable of Darwinian evolution, (ii) metabolic-like chemistry that sustains an overall dissipative system with a fuel source and (iii) compartmentalization to separate the chemical system from the environment. Although the assimilation of all three within a protocell is presumably needed to generate a highly adaptable system capable of surviving environmental fluctuations, more narrow investigations have already begun to reveal how mechanisms, such as autocatalysis, can give rise to characteristics that imitate some features of life. Importantly, these studies directly link thermodynamics, kinetics, competition and selection in a way that is absent in discussions of the energetic fluxes present at hydrothermal vents.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Living systems use metabolism to exploit the free energy released from the degradation of fuel to maintain their out-of-equilibrium state. As life is a chemical unit capable of catalysing the degradation of fuel and is capable of proliferation, a feedback loop is established between the fuel containing environment and the living organism. (Online version in colour.)

What these studies typically have in common is either the presence of autocatalysis or dependence on reactions that proceed along different paths in the forward and reverse directions. Autocatalysis is simply when the product of a reaction catalyses its own formation [54,55] and represents an efficient means of funnelling reactions down a restricted path towards a common product. A well-known example is the ability of the Soai reaction to resolve a nearly racemic mixture to enantiopurity, perhaps revealing the types of mechanisms that led to life being largely dependent on homochirality [55]. However, the examples typically encountered in origins of life research are more complex, rely on a phase transition of some type and focus on replication. For example, Luisi and co-workers [56] demonstrated how the hydrolysis of ethyl caprylate produces ethanol and the fatty acid caprylate. When sufficient fatty acid is produced, the caprylate assembles into micelles that then catalyse the formation of more fatty acid [56], although later computational work suggests that the mechanism is more complex [54,57,58]. Here, it is not solely the formation of a molecule, the fatty acid, that is critical, but that this molecule is able to self-assemble into a higher order aggregate structure that then pulls the system away from equilibrium in addition to acting as a catalyst for the synthesis of more fatty acid. This type of A + B ⇌ C → D, where D is an aggregate, or new phase, composed of C is common.

More recent examples [59] with modified peptides instead of fatty acids exploit the ability of some of the intermediate products to aggregate into fibres (figure 4a). In one example, peptides are modified with a benzenedithiol group that upon oxidation forms an array of disulfide macrocycles in which one specific type, the hexameric form, assembles into fibres [60,61]. In this case, the fibres represent the newly formed phase similar to the micelle example above. If none of the disulfide macrocycles formed were capable of phase separation, then the final pool of molecules would reflect the free energy of the products and their placement within the free energy landscape [62]. Conversely, when one molecule is capable of self-assembly, the gained free energy favours the accumulation of the self-assembled state at the expense of the non-assembling competitors [60,63]. The dynamics of similar systems has been studied [64], including systems with aggregates composed of prebiotic precursors of RNA [65,66]. However, the described peptide version can also be mechanically broken, leading to a form of replication whereby the fibre fragments seed the growth of more fibres in a way similar to that seen with crushed crystals [61].

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Self-assembly pulls systems out-of-equilibrium. (a) Autocatalysis. Building blocks (1), e.g. thiol containing peptides, react with a fuel molecule or oxidant (2) to form a dynamic combinatorial library (3). One molecular member of the library can self-assemble (4), thus pulling the system out-of-equilibrium. The self-assembled state (4) itself, or after mechanical breakage, can catalyse the formation of more of the self-assembled state. Further, new properties of the self-assembled state, either intrinsically or by uptake of cofactors from the environment, may emerge which facilitate the productive consumption of building blocks (5). (b) Differential formation and degradation pathways. A mixture of soluble building blocks (1), e.g. fatty acids, react with fuel molecules (2), such as a carbodiimide, to generate products of decreased solubility (3) that can be degraded back to the building block through hydrolysis. The self-assembly of a subset of products (4) inhibits the back reaction, thereby pulling the system away from equilibrium and sustaining an assembly of unstable molecules over time. (Online version in colour.)

The key to ensuring a continuous out-of-equilibrium state is the coupling of the system to its energy source. Therefore, the building blocks cannot be completely consumed and the final self-assembled state itself should not inhibit exponential self-replication [67]. Serial transfer, whereby a portion of the self-replicating set is introduced to a new environment with replenished fuel sources, can be used to overcome equilibrium [68]. Perhaps more elegantly, the mechanically induced breakage of fibres described above additionally helps to avoid reaching equilibrium, because the broken fibres increase the number of available self-replicating template sites [61]. That is, the change in copy number of the self-replicator further pulls the system towards dynamic kinetic stability instead of thermodynamic equilibrium [5052]. One objective of those working on such systems is to allow for open-ended evolution in a way similar but not limited to Red Queen coevolution [69,70] whereby a self-replicating entity partially, or wholly, displaces the free energy landscape of a system. As a consequence, other self-replicating entities present within the ecosystem must engage in reciprocal adaptive interactions. The resulting ecosystem has the potential to overcome Eigen's paradox, which relates the complexity of the system to copying fidelity [71], because interconnected catalytic hypercycles can function as a dynamic community ensuring accuracy in self-replication, in a way similar to Eigen's quasi-species model [72].

The goal in research on self-replicators is often to identify replicators that acquire metabolism by catalysing chemical reactions within the environment in a way that promotes their own replication. In impressive work by Otto and co-workers [73], peptide fibres were found to recruit chromophore cofactors from the environment, which led to the photooxidation of the building blocks. As oxidation of the building blocks is necessary to form the disulfide linked macrocycles necessary for subsequent self-assembly into fibres, a positive feedback loop emerged from the chemical system that allowed the self-replicator to better harness the surrounding environment. Significantly, such feedback loops can also emerge from the intrinsic properties of the fibres themselves through interactions with the environment without the need of cofactors [74].

5. Non-autocatalytic out-of-equilibria

It is additionally possible to maintain the existence of a thermodynamically unfavourable state without autocatalysis if the product of the pathway is formed and degraded by different paths [75]. In this case, the depletion of the fuel leads to the disassembly of the non-kinetically trapped aggregate. Such examples typically exploit phase separation, with the formation of actin filaments and microtubules representing biological examples [75]. An instructive case is that of the carbodiimide mediated formation of fatty acid anhydrides that then phase separate into oil droplets that are more resistant to hydrolysis back to the fatty acid building block [76] (figure 4b). If the starting pool of building blocks consists of fatty acids of different lengths, then the fatty anhydrides of the longer chain fatty acids preferentially form oil droplets, meaning that the major products consist of the longer chain fatty anhydrides. As expected, the preferential formation of one subset of fatty anhydrides is accentuated by repeated refuelling, particularly when performed in batch additions as opposed to continuous feeding. Therefore, even without autocatalysis, competition can emerge between different chemical systems, with one, out-of-equilibrium subset persisting and out-competing competitors over time [76]. It is interesting to note that older examples of chemical systems persisting in the presence of separate chemical reactions that feed and degrade fatty acid vesicles were reported in support of the importance of autopoiesis in the origins of life [77].

6. Conclusion

We have not attempted to go through all the examples but rather to point out that dissipative systems that mimic some critical features of life can emerge in scenarios that do not depend on hydrothermal vent conditions [7881]. Energy is not a unique property of hydrothermal vents. The Sun is a clear example of a prebiotic energy source that would have been inaccessible in the deep sea [3,17,44], and chemical energy sources, e.g. isonitriles, likely drove prebiotic chemistry forward [82]. Work on non-hydrothermal, out-of-equilibrium systems thus far has made impressive progress, but none of these previous studies attempted to work within prebiotically plausible conditions and rarely made use of molecules that were clearly on a path from prebiotic chemistry to life-as-we-know-it, with a possible exception being the formose reaction [83], although not universally accepted [84]. If prebiotically plausible dissipative systems were experimentally demonstrated that clearly tied into a protocellular architecture in a way that helped explain extant biology, then the case for one prebiotic scenario over another would be strengthened. Such a system may look quite different from the directly coupled examples developed thus far, because the way in which biology exploits the dissipation of a fuel source to drive cellular organization and function is considerably more complex. It is, therefore, fair to ask if extant metabolic-like chemistry emerged early or was a later invention.

To help gain insight into this problem, we believe that more work is needed that integrates multiple components and pathways together into protocellular compartments. That is, we should take what has been learned from out-of-equilibrium, dissipative chemical systems and apply these principles to the construction of fuel-driven, prebiotically plausible protocells. The lack of use of vesicles in studies on protometabolism is surprising, as the simple presence of a membrane alters chemistry, facilitating peptide synthesis [85,86], competition [86,87] and provides for ways to tie chemistry to the survivability of the protocell [88]. There are already some clues regarding how catabolic and anabolic chemistry could have been coupled. The prebiotic synthesis of iron–sulfur clusters has been demonstrated [89], and iron–sulfur peptides can engage in electron transfer reactions that lead to the generation of a proton gradient across diacyl phospholipid membranes [90]. Further, prebiotic fuel sources, such as α-ketoacids, can initiate electron transfer reactions in a way that resembles what is found in biology [91]. It seems that several pieces of the puzzle are there, ready to be put in place, with the striking exception of nucleic acids. Although the challenge is great, we suspect that many critical insights will come from a more concerted effort to investigate how prebiotically plausible chemistry could have fuelled early protocells. Regardless of the outcome, the data will likely help settle some of the ongoing debates regarding the role of (proto)metabolism in the origins of life.

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Rossetto, L. Valer and the reviewers for helpful comments and criticisms of this manuscript.

Data accessibility

This article has no additional data.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed to conceptualization, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing. All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Competing interests

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

We acknowledge the support of the Simons Foundation (grant no. 290358FY19) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (grant no. RGPIN-2020) to S.S.M.

References

  • 1.Ruiz-Mirazo K. 2020. Boundary versus enabling conditions for the origins of life. Phys. Life Rev. 34–35, 96-98. ( 10.1016/j.plrev.2020.06.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ruiz-Mirazo K, Briones C, de la Escosura A. 2014. Prebiotic systems chemistry: new perspectives for the origins of life. Chem. Rev. 114, 285-366. ( 10.1021/cr2004844) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Green NJ, Xu J, Sutherland JD. 2021. Illuminating life's origins: UV photochemistry in abiotic synthesis of biomolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 7219-7236. ( 10.1021/jacs.1c01839) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Krishnamurthy R. 2018. Life's biological chemistry: a destiny or destination starting from prebiotic chemistry? Chem. Eur. J. 24, 16 708-16 715. ( 10.1002/chem.201801847) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lazcano A. 2009. Complexity, self-organization and the origin of life: the happy liaison? In Origins of life: self-organization and/or biological evolution? [internet], pp. 13-22. Paris, France: EDP Sciences. See http://www.origins-and-evolution.org/10.1051/orvie/2009002. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Muchowska KB, Varma SJ, Moran J. 2020. Nonenzymatic metabolic reactions and life's origins. Chem. Rev. 120, 7708-7744. ( 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00191) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lazcano A, Miller SL. 1999. On the origin of metabolic pathways. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 424-431. ( 10.1007/PL00006565) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ralser M. 2014. The RNA world and the origin of metabolic enzymes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 985-988. ( 10.1042/BST20140132) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu L-F, Sutherland JD. 2019. Provisioning the origin and early evolution of life. Bayley H, editor. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 3, 459-468. ( 10.1042/ETLS20190011) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peretó J. 2012. Out of fuzzy chemistry: from prebiotic chemistry to metabolic networks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5394. ( 10.1039/c2cs35054h) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Weiss MC, Preiner M, Xavier JC, Zimorski V, Martin WF. 2018. The last universal common ancestor between ancient Earth chemistry and the onset of genetics. Achtman M, editor. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007518. ( 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007518) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gil R, Silva FJ, Peretó J, Moya A. 2004. Determination of the core of a minimal bacterial gene set. MMBR 68, 518-537. ( 10.1128/MMBR.68.3.518-537.2004) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Weiss MC, Sousa FL, Mrnjavac N, Neukirchen S, Roettger M, Nelson-Sathi S, Martin WF. 2016. The physiology and habitat of the last universal common ancestor. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16116. ( 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.116) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ruiz-Mirazo K. 2019. Reaction: a plea for hypothesis-driven research in prebiotic systems chemistry. Chem 5, 1920-1922. ( 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.06.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miller SL, Urey HC. 1959. Organic compound synthesis on the primitive earth: several questions about the origin of life have been answered, but much remains to be studied. Science 130, 245-251. ( 10.1126/science.130.3370.245) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wöhler F. 1828. Ueber künstliche Bildung des Harnstoffs. Ann. Phys. Chem. 88, 253-256. ( 10.1002/andp.18280880206) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deal AM, Rapf RJ, Vaida V. 2021. Water–air interfaces as environments to address the water paradox in prebiotic chemistry: a physical chemistry perspective. J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 4929-4942. ( 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c02864) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cody GD. 2000. Primordial carbonylated iron-sulfur compounds and the synthesis of pyruvate. Science 289, 1337-1340. ( 10.1126/science.289.5483.1337) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Horita J. 1999. Abiogenic methane formation and isotopic fractionation under hydrothermal conditions. Science 285, 1055-1057. ( 10.1126/science.285.5430.1055) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hudson R, et al. 2020. CO2 reduction driven by a pH gradient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 22 873-22 879. ( 10.1073/pnas.2002659117) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Preiner M, et al. 2020. A hydrogen-dependent geochemical analogue of primordial carbon and energy metabolism. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 534-542. ( 10.1038/s41559-020-1125-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Muchowska KB, Varma SJ, Chevallot-Beroux E, Lethuillier-Karl L, Li G, Moran J. 2017. Metals promote sequences of the reverse Krebs cycle. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1716-1721. ( 10.1038/s41559-017-0311-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu Z, Wu L-F, Kufner C, Sasselov DD, Fischer W, Sutherland J. 2021. Prebiotic Photoredox Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Sulfite [Internet]. 2021 Feb [cited 2021 May 30]. See https://chemrxiv.org/articles/preprint/Prebiotic_Photoredox_Synthesis_from_Carbon_Dioxide_and_Sulfite/13692772/1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Stubbs RT, Yadav M, Krishnamurthy R, Springsteen G. 2020. A plausible metal-free ancestral analogue of the Krebs cycle composed entirely of α-ketoacids. Nat. Chem. 12, 1016-1022. ( 10.1038/s41557-020-00560-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ferus M, Kubelík P, Knížek A, Pastorek A, Sutherland J, Civiš S. 2017. High energy radical chemistry formation of HCN-rich atmospheres on early earth. Sci. Rep. 7, 6275. ( 10.1038/s41598-017-06489-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miyakawa S, James Cleaves H, Miller SL. 2002. The cold origin of life: A. implications based on the hydrolytic stabilities of hydrogen cyanide and formamide. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 32, 195-208. ( 10.1023/A:1016514305984) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Smith KE, House CH, Arevalo RD, Dworkin JP, Callahan MP. 2019. Organometallic compounds as carriers of extraterrestrial cyanide in primitive meteorites. Nat. Commun. 10, 2777. ( 10.1038/s41467-019-10866-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Foden CS, Islam S, Fernández-García C, Maugeri L, Sheppard TD, Powner MW. 2020. Prebiotic synthesis of cysteine peptides that catalyze peptide ligation in neutral water. Science 370, 865-869. ( 10.1126/science.abd5680) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Patel BH, Percivalle C, Ritson DJ, Duffy CD, Sutherland JD. 2015. Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism. Nat. Chem. 7, 301-307. ( 10.1038/nchem.2202) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Becker S, Thoma I, Deutsch A, Gehrke T, Mayer P, Zipse H, Carell T. et al. 2016. A high-yielding, strictly regioselective prebiotic purine nucleoside formation pathway. Science 352, 833-836. ( 10.1126/science.aad2808) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stairs S, Nikmal A, Bučar D-K, Zheng S-L, Szostak JW, Powner MW. 2017. Divergent prebiotic synthesis of pyrimidine and 8-oxo-purine ribonucleotides. Nat. Commun. 8, 15270. ( 10.1038/ncomms15270) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xu J, et al. 2020. Selective prebiotic formation of RNA pyrimidine and DNA purine nucleosides. Nature 582, 60-66. ( 10.1038/s41586-020-2330-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Powner MW, Gerland B, Sutherland JD. 2009. Synthesis of activated pyrimidine ribonucleotides in prebiotically plausible conditions. Nature 459, 239-242. ( 10.1038/nature08013) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Keller MA, Turchyn AV, Ralser M. 2014. Non-enzymatic glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway-like reactions in a plausible Archean ocean. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 725. ( 10.1002/msb.20145228) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Muchowska KB, Varma SJ, Moran J. 2019. Synthesis and breakdown of universal metabolic precursors promoted by iron. Nature 569, 104-107. ( 10.1038/s41586-019-1151-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Krishnamurthy R, Guntha S, Eschenmoser A. 2000. Regioselective α-phosphorylation of aldoses in aqueous solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 2281-2285. () [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Coggins AJ, Powner MW. 2017. Prebiotic synthesis of phosphoenol pyruvate by α-phosphorylation-controlled triose glycolysis. Nat. Chem. 9, 310-317. ( 10.1038/nchem.2624) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Springsteen G, Yerabolu JR, Nelson J, Rhea CJ, Krishnamurthy R. 2018. Linked cycles of oxidative decarboxylation of glyoxylate as protometabolic analogs of the citric acid cycle. Nat. Commun. 9, 91. ( 10.1038/s41467-017-02591-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Trefil J, Morowitz HJ, Smith E. 2009. The origin of life: a case is made for the descent of electrons. Am. Sci. 97, 206-213. ( 10.1511/2009.78.206) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schrodinger E, Penrose R. 2012. What is life?: with mind and matter and autobiographical sketches [internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [cited 24 May 2021]. See http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107295629. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mitchell P. 1961. Coupling of phosphorylation to electron and hydrogen transfer by a chemi-osmotic type of mechanism. Nature 191, 144-148. ( 10.1038/191144a0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Martin WF, Sousa FL, Lane N. 2014. Energy at life's origin. Science 344, 1092-1093. ( 10.1126/science.1251653) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Todd ZR, Szabla R, Szostak JW, Sasselov DD. 2019. UV photostability of three 2-aminoazoles with key roles in prebiotic chemistry on the early earth. Chem. Commun. 55, 10 388-10 391. ( 10.1039/C9CC05265H) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Todd ZR, Fahrenbach AC, Ranjan S, Magnani CJ, Szostak JW, Sasselov DD. 2020. Ultraviolet-driven deamination of cytidine ribonucleotides under planetary conditions. Astrobiology 20, 878-888. ( 10.1089/ast.2019.2182) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhu TF, Adamala K, Zhang N, Szostak JW. 2012. Photochemically driven redox chemistry induces protocell membrane pearling and division. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9828-9832. ( 10.1073/pnas.1203212109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Flores E, Martinez E, Rodriguez LE, Weber JM, Khodayari A, VanderVelde DG, Barge LM. et al. 2021. Effects of amino acids on phosphate adsorption onto iron (oxy)hydroxide minerals under early earth conditions. ACS Earth Space Chem. 5, 1048-1057. ( 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jordan SF, Rammu H, Zheludev IN, Hartley AM, Maréchal A, Lane N. 2019. Promotion of protocell self-assembly from mixed amphiphiles at the origin of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1705-1714. ( 10.1038/s41559-019-1015-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Copley SD, Smith E, Morowitz HJ. 2007. The origin of the RNA world: co-evolution of genes and metabolism. Bioorg. Chem. 35, 430-443. ( 10.1016/j.bioorg.2007.08.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lane N, Allen JF, Martin W. 2010. How did LUCA make a living? Chemiosmosis in the origin of life. Bioessays 32, 271-280. ( 10.1002/bies.200900131) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pascal R, Pross A, Sutherland JD. 2013. Towards an evolutionary theory of the origin of life based on kinetics and thermodynamics. Open Biol. 3, 130156. ( 10.1098/rsob.130156) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pross A, Khodorkovsky V. 2004. Extending the concept of kinetic stability: toward a paradigm for life. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 17, 312-316. ( 10.1002/poc.729) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pross A, Pascal R. 2017. How and why kinetics, thermodynamics, and chemistry induce the logic of biological evolution. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 13, 665-674. ( 10.3762/bjoc.13.66) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Grzybowski BA, Stone HA, Whitesides GM. 2000. Dynamic self-assembly of magnetized, millimetre-sized objects rotating at a liquid–air interface. Nature 405, 1033-1036. ( 10.1038/35016528) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bissette AJ, Fletcher SP. 2013. Mechanisms of autocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 12 800-12 826. ( 10.1002/anie.201303822) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Blackmond DG. 2020. Autocatalytic models for the origin of biological homochirality. Chem. Rev. 120, 4831-4847. ( 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00557) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bachmann PA, Luisi PL, Lang J. 1992. Autocatalytic self-replicating micelles as models for prebiotic structures. Nature 357, 57-59. ( 10.1038/357057a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Buhse T, Nagarajan R, Lavabre D, Micheau JC. 1997. Phase-transfer model for the dynamics of ‘micellar autocatalysis’. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 3910-3917. ( 10.1021/jp9705838) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Buhse T, Lavabre D, Nagarajan R, Micheau JC. 1998. Origin of autocatalysis in the biphasic alkaline hydrolysis of C-4 to C-8 ethyl alkanoates. J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 10 552-10 559. ( 10.1021/jp982765n) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Adamski P, Eleveld M, Sood A, Kun Á, Szilágyi A, Czárán T, Szathmáry E, Otto S. 2020. From self-replication to replicator systems en route to de novo life. Nat. Rev. Chem. 4, 386-403. ( 10.1038/s41570-020-0196-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Carnall JMA, Waudby CA, Belenguer AM, Stuart MCA, Peyralans JJ-P, Otto S. 2010. Mechanosensitive Self-replication driven by self-organization. Science 327, 1502-1506. ( 10.1126/science.1182767) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Colomb-Delsuc M, Mattia E, Sadownik JW, Otto S. 2015. Exponential self-replication enabled through a fibre elongation/breakage mechanism. Nat. Commun. 6, 7427. ( 10.1038/ncomms8427) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Otto S. 2002. Selection and amplification of hosts from dynamic combinatorial libraries of macrocyclic disulfides. Science 297, 590-593. ( 10.1126/science.1072361) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xu S, Giuseppone N. 2008. Self-duplicating amplification in a dynamic combinatorial library. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 1826-1827. ( 10.1021/ja710248q) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cafferty BJ, Wong ASY, Semenov SN, Belding L, Gmür S, Huck WTS, Whitesides GM. 2019. Robustness, entrainment, and hybridization in dissipative molecular networks, and the origin of life. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 8289-8295. ( 10.1021/jacs.9b02554) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cafferty BJ, Gállego I, Chen MC, Farley KI, Eritja R, Hud NV. 2013. Efficient self-assembly in water of long noncovalent polymers by nucleobase analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 2447-2450. ( 10.1021/ja312155v) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen MC, Cafferty BJ, Mamajanov I, Gallego I, Krishnamurthy R, Hud NV. 2014. Spontaneous prebiotic formation of a β-ribofuranoside that self-assembles with a complementary heterocycle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5640-5646. ( 10.1021/ja410124v) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.von Kiedrowski G. 1993. Minimal replicator theory I: parabolic versus exponential growth. In Bioorganic chemistry frontiers (eds Dugas H, Schmidtchen FP), pp. 113-146. Berlin, Germany: Springer. See http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-78110-0_4. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hordijk W, Vaidya N, Lehman N. 2014. Serial transfer can aid the evolution of autocatalytic sets. J. Syst. Chem. 5, 4. ( 10.1186/1759-2208-5-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.de Vladar HP, Santos M, Szathmáry E. 2017. Grand views of evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 324-334. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2017.01.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Van Valen L. 1974. Molecular evolution as predicted by natural selection. J. Mol. Evol. 3, 89-101. ( 10.1007/BF01796554) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Eigen M. 1971. Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58, 465-523. ( 10.1007/BF00623322) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Eigen M, Schuster P. 1979. The hypercycle. Berlin, Germany: Springer. See http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-67247-7. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Monreal Santiago G, Liu K, Browne WR, Otto S. 2020. Emergence of light-driven protometabolism on recruitment of a photocatalytic cofactor by a self-replicator. Nat. Chem. 12, 603-607. ( 10.1038/s41557-020-0494-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ottelé J, Hussain AS, Mayer C, Otto S. 2020. Chance emergence of catalytic activity and promiscuity in a self-replicator. Nat. Catal. 3, 547-553. ( 10.1038/s41929-020-0463-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Boekhoven J, Hendriksen WE, Koper GJM, Eelkema R, van Esch JH. 2015. Transient assembly of active materials fueled by a chemical reaction. Science 349, 1075-1079. ( 10.1126/science.aac6103) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Tena-Solsona M, Wanzke C, Riess B, Bausch AR, Boekhoven J. 2018. Self-selection of dissipative assemblies driven by primitive chemical reaction networks. Nat. Commun. 9, 2044. ( 10.1038/s41467-018-04488-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zepik HH, Blöchliger E, Luisi PL. 2001. A chemical model of homeostasis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 199-202. () [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen C, Tan J, Hsieh M-C, Pan T, Goodwin JT, Mehta AK, Grover MA, Lynn DG. 2017. Design of multi-phase dynamic chemical networks. Nat. Chem. 9, 799-804. ( 10.1038/nchem.2737) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Colomer I, Borissov A, Fletcher SP. 2020. Selection from a pool of self-assembling lipid replicators. Nat. Commun. 11, 176. ( 10.1038/s41467-019-13903-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Moulin E, Armao JJ, Giuseppone N. 2019. Triarylamine-based supramolecular polymers: structures, dynamics, and functions. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 975-983. ( 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00536) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rubinov B, Wagner N, Rapaport H, Ashkenasy G. 2009. Self-replicating amphiphilic β-sheet peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6683-6686. ( 10.1002/anie.200902790) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Liu Z, Wu L-F, Xu J, Bonfio C, Russell DA, Sutherland JD. 2020. Harnessing chemical energy for the activation and joining of prebiotic building blocks. Nat. Chem. 12, 1023-1028. ( 10.1038/s41557-020-00564-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ricardo A, Carrigan MA, Olcott AN, Benner SA. 2004. Borate minerals stabilize ribose. Science 303, 196. ( 10.1126/science.1092464) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ritson DJ, Battilocchio C, Ley SV, Sutherland JD. 2018. Mimicking the surface and prebiotic chemistry of early Earth using flow chemistry. Nat. Commun. 9, 1821. ( 10.1038/s41467-018-04147-2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Murillo-Sánchez S, Beaufils D, González Mañas JM, Pascal R, Ruiz-Mirazo K. 2016. Fatty acids’ double role in the prebiotic formation of a hydrophobic dipeptide. Chem. Sci. 7, 3406-3413. ( 10.1039/C5SC04796J) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Adamala K, Szostak JW. 2013. Competition between model protocells driven by an encapsulated catalyst. Nat. Chem. 5, 495-501. ( 10.1038/nchem.1650) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chen IA, Roberts RW, Szostak JW. 2004. The emergence of competition between model protocells. Science 305, 1474-1476. ( 10.1126/science.1100757) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Piedrafita G, Monnard P-A, Mavelli F, Ruiz-Mirazo K. 2017. Permeability-driven selection in a semi-empirical protocell model: the roots of prebiotic systems evolution. Sci. Rep. 7, 3141. ( 10.1038/s41598-017-02799-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bonfio C, Valer L, Scintilla S, Shah S, Evans DJ, Jin L, Szostak JW, Sasselov DD, Sutherland JD, Mansy SS. 2017. UV-light-driven prebiotic synthesis of iron–sulfur clusters. Nat. Chem. 9, 1229-1234. ( 10.1038/nchem.2817) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bonfio C, Godino E, Corsini M, de Biani F F, Guella G, Mansy SS. 2018. Prebiotic iron–sulfur peptide catalysts generate a pH gradient across model membranes of late protocells. Nat. Catal. 1, 616-623. ( 10.1038/s41929-018-0116-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Basak S, Nader S, Mansy SS. 2021. Protometabolic reduction of NAD+ with α-Keto acids. JACS Au 1, 371-374. ( 10.1021/jacsau.0c00124) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This article has no additional data.


Articles from Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES