Skip to main content
Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2022 Aug 4;2022:1514244. doi: 10.1155/2022/1514244

Analysis of the Cytokine Expression in the Aqueous Humor of Individuals with BRVO-Associated Macular Edema

Chengyi Zhu 1, Lanlan Pan 1, Qiong Yi 1, Qiping Wei 2,
PMCID: PMC9371839  PMID: 35967519

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in the aqueous humor of patients with macular edema (ME) caused by branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), as well as to investigate the relationship between the cytokines as mentioned earlier and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ME, and the degree of ME from the molecular level.

Methods

In a prospective observational study, fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were used to classify 58 patients with non-ischemic BRVO-ME into three groups according to the degree of ME: 14-mild, 17-moderate, and 27-severe. The specific concentration of IL-6, VEGF, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor was detected using the BD CSCanto™ II Flow Cytometer (US). Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis was used to test the correlation between the levels of BCVA and severity of ME and the expression levels of IL-6, VEGF, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor.

Results

According to the obtained data, BCVA did not correlate with the severity of ME, and these four cytokines expression levels in patients' aqueous humor (P > 0.05). Moreover, BCVA did not correlate with mild, moderate, or severe ME as well (P > 0.05). However, the levels of these four cytokines were correlated with the severity of the ME. These underlined cytokines were linked to the mild, moderate, and severe degrees of ME. VEGF was also significantly correlated (r > 0.8, P < 0.0001) with the severity of ME.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the severity of ME in BRVO-ME patients is significantly correlated with the expression levels of IL-6, VEGF, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor. Lowering the level of disease-associated cytokines may potentially reduce the degree of ME. Therefore, an in-depth study of the levels and the relationship may provide some evidence for the pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of BRVO-ME.

1. Introduction

Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common fundus vascular disease. According to a 2015 epidemiological survey, the prevalence of BRVO among adults aged 30–89 years was 0.64% worldwide, with cumulative 5 and 10 years rates of 0.86% and 1.63%, respectively, with Asians having the highest prevalence rate. The estimated number of patients is 23.38 million worldwide, most of them over 50 years of age [1, 2]. The macular edema (ME) caused by BRVO is the main cause of visual impairment and even blindness, with an incidence rate of about 30% [36].

After the occurrence of BRVO, the venous blood flow in the blocked area is stagnant, increasing the pressure in the capillary system, destroying the blood-retinal barrier (BRB), damaging the tight junctions of capillary endothelial cells, and leading to the disruption of the dynamic balance of fluid infiltration and excretion in the macular tissue which results in macular edema [79]. First, due to the stagnation of blood flow in the obstructed area, the retina is in a state of ischemia and hypoxia, resulting in strongly expressed VEGF levels. VEGF can activate the VEGFR-1 signaling pathway. Under hypoxia, activated VEGFR-1 can stimulate monocytes/macrophages to strongly express IL-6 and other inflammatory cytokines. By promoting actin filament rearrangement, IL-6 can induce the formation of gap junctions between adjacent cells, thereby increasing the permeability of the vascular endothelium and aggravating the degree of ME [816]. Second, VEGF can also activate the VEGFR-2 signaling pathway to increase vascular permeability. Moreover, it can upregulate the expression level of downstream ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and other cytokines through the nuclear factor Kappa beta (NF-κB) signaling pathway. These cytokines can recruit leukocytes for chemotaxis and adhere to the vascular endothelium, leading to leukocyte stasis and even blood flow stagnation, further aggravating the degree of retinal occlusion and expanding the scope of occlusion, aggravating the ischemia and hypoxia of the retina in the occluded area. Additionally, the adhesion of leukocytes to the vascular endothelium can destroy the function of the vascular endothelium and increase the vascular endothelial function. Permeability increases the degree of ME and forms a positive feedback loop [8, 9, 13]. Simultaneously, aberrant leukocyte adhesion results in leukocyte stasis and the blood flow slows, resulting in blood flow stagnation. Additionally, the increased chemotaxis and aberrant adherence of leukocytes will increase the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, enhancing the inflammatory response and establishing another positive feedback loop. [8, 9, 13]. The abovementioned multiple cytokines and signaling pathways are all involved in the formation and development of the BRVO-ME, hypoxia, and inflammation cascades and form a complex network of signaling pathways through multiple positive feedback loops, eventually leading to chronic, recurrent, and refractory ME [4, 14, 17, 18].

Taken together, BRVO-ME is the result of the joint action of a variety of cytokines and their signaling pathways. VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 are important in the positive feedback loop. However, the relationship between these cytokines and the severity of ME is unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the severity of ME in BRVO-ME patients and the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Case Selection

2.1.1. Inclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) The diagnosis confirmed by fluorescein fundus angiography [19, 20] (FFA), optical coherence tomography (OCT; Spectralis OCTHeidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), non-ischemic BRVO-ME, first onset, and without any treatment; (2) no posterior vitreous detachment found by OCT; (3) those with the diseases of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, etc., but no fundus manifestations of related diseases were found on examination of the affected eye and the contralateral eye; and (4) the duration of the disease was less than 1 m.

2.1.2. Exclusion Criteria

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Eye surgery within 3 m; (2) ME caused by diseases other than BRVO-ME; (3) during pregnancy or breastfeeding; (4) a history of acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease within 6 m; (5) history of systemic or local use of hormones within 3 m; and (6) those with severe hepatic and renal insufficiency.

2.2. Clinical Data

This prospective observational study was conducted on 58 patients (58 eyes) with non-ischemic BRVO-ME. Each patient received intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IRI) from June 2018 to June 2021 in Beijing Hepingli Hospital. The degree of ME was classified into three categories based on the findings of an OCT examination [21]: mild: 200 μ·m ≤ CMT<350 μ·m, moderate: 350 ≤ CMT < 500 μ·m, and severe: CMT ≥ 500 μ·m.

2.3. Methods

Each patient received surgery in an aseptic ophthalmic operating room. First, 0.1 ml of the aqueous humor was extracted and kept at −80°C concurrently. Then, IRI was performed. The human IL-6, VEGF, ICAM, and VCAM Plex Flex Set Kit (BD Biosciences) were used in the ELISA procedure. Each index specific concentration was determined using the FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The same ophthalmologist collected IRI and aqueous humor samples. Both the IRI and the collection of aqueous humor samples were conducted in compliance with the State Council of the People's Republic of China's “Regulations on Hospital Management.” Each patient signed an informed consent form. The study was authorized and approved under the ethical review number 2018–06.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 26.0 software was used for descriptive and statistical analysis in this study. Measurement data conforming to the normal distribution were expressed as (x±s) using a t-test. Non-conformity to the normal distribution was expressed as M (P25, P75) using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine correlations, with r > 0.5 suggesting a strong correlation, 0.5 > r > 0.3 indicating a normal correlation, and r < 0.3 indicating a weak correlation. P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Information about Patients

The clinical and demographic characteristics of the 58 patients (58 eyes) are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical and demographic data.

Index Numerical value
Age 67.46 ± 8.35 years
Sex (F/M) 27/31
Duration of the disease 15 (9, 15) days
Eye type (R/L) 28/30
Obstruction sites (ST/IT) 38/20
IOP 13.53 ± 2.19 mm·Hg
BCVA (logMAR) 0.5 (0.9, 0.4)
CMT 494 (369, 587) μ·m
Hypertension (Thirty-one/53.45%)
 SBP 157.36 ± 24.72 mm·Hg
 DBP 95.53 ± 18.45 mm·Hg
Diabetes (twenty-one/34.48%)
 Baseline HbA1c 7.9 (6.5, 9.6)%
 FBS 10.82 ± 1.61 mmol/L
Hyperlipidemia (eight/13.79%)
 TC 4.28 ± 0.79 mmol/L
 TG 2.12 ± 0.39 mmol/L
 HDL-C 1.07 ± 0.17 mmol/L
 LDL-C 2.76 ± 0.15 mmol/L

ST, superior temporal; IT, inferior temporal; IOP, intraocular pressure; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; CMT, central macular thickness; SBP, Systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; FBS, fasting blood sugar; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.

3.2. The Relationship between the Level of BCVA, CMT, VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and the Severity of ME in the Aqueous Humor

CMT is categorized ME into three degrees based on OCT findings: mild, moderate, and severe. The expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in aqueous humor varied with the mild, moderate, and severe degrees of ME. However, BCVA did not tend to change with the mild, moderate, and severe degrees of ME (Table 2).

Table 2.

BCVA, CTM, and the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor.

Category Case (n) BCVA CMT (μ·m) VEGF (pg/ml) IL-6 (pg/ml) ICAM-1 (pg/ml) VCAM-1 (pg/ml)
Mild 14 0.5 (0.9, 0.4) 338 (277, 349) 29.29 (13.95, 67.74) 3.34 (1.30, 45.59) 64.43 (56.13, 75.37) 128.39 (57.33, 158.54)
Moderate 17 0.5 (0.7, 0.4) 423 (388, 450) 73.85 (72.25, 81.95) 100.40 (31.85, 303.60) 109.57 (92.06, 133.29) 241.45 (211.34, 391.07)
Severe 27 0.7 (1.0, 0.5) 652 (546, 766) 90.34 (16.14, 219.11) 131.12 (10.96, 3914.34) 176.45 (133.29, 190.20) 391.37 (249.01, 525.19)

BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CMT, central macular thickness; IL-6, interleukin-6; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

3.3. Correlation Analysis of BCVA and the Severity of ME

The Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between BCVA and the severity of ME. The obtained data revealed no significant correlation between BCVA and the severity of ME, i.e., mild, moderate, and severe (P > 0.05) as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Correlation analysis of BCVA and the severity of ME.

CMT Mild Moderate severe
BCVA r P R P r P
0.4575 0.1000 −0.3130 0.2213 −0.0677 0.7371

CMT, central macular thickness; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity.

3.4. Relationship between BCVA and the Expression Levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the Aqueous Humor

The association between BCVA and the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor was investigated using the Pearson correlation analysis. As a result, no significant correlation was observed between BCVA and expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor. (P > 0.05) as presented in Table 4.

Table 4.

Correlation analysis between BCVA and the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor.

Category VEGF (pg/ml) IL-6 (pg/ml) ICAM-1 (pg/ml) VCAM-1 (pg/ml)
r/P r P r P r P r P
Mild 0.3379 0.2181 0.1727 0.5382 0.4521 0.0907 0.0361 0.8983
Moderate 0.0470 0.8579 0.4076 0.1044 0.2122 0.4136 0.1781 0.4940
Severe 0.1586 0.4295 0.0593 0.7691 0.0528 0.7936 0.0890 0.6589

BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; IL-6, interleukin-6; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

3.5. Relationship between the Severity of ME and the Expression Levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the Aqueous Humor

The severity of ME and the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor were studied using the Pearson correlation analysis. According to the findings, the degree of ME (mild, moderate, and severe) was positively related to VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 expression levels in the aqueous humor. Except for a moderate correlation between severe ME and VCAM-1 (r = 0.4847, P=0.0104), the other degrees of ME were found to be strongly correlated (r > 0.5, P < 0.01) with the level of cytokines (VEGF, IL-6, and ICAM-1) and the mild, moderate, and severe degrees of ME were also positively correlated with the level of VEGF (r > 0.8, P < 0.0001) (Table 5, Figures 14).

Table 5.

Correlation analysis between the severity of ME and the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor.

Category VEGF (pg/ml) IL-6 (pg/ml) ICAM-1 (pg/ml) VCAM-1 (pg/ml)
r/P r P r P r P r P
Mild 0.9129 <0.0001 0.8159 0.0004 0.8559 <0.0001 0.8931 <0.0001
Moderate 0.9574 <0.0001 0.7751 0.0003 0.5850 0.0108 0.5880 0.0130
Severe 0.8202 <0.0001 0.7438 <0.0001 0.7328 <0.0001 0.4847 0.0104

VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; IL-6, interleukin-6; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Correlation analysis of ME with a mild, moderate, and severe degree and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Correlation analysis of ME with a mild, moderate, and severe degree and IL-6 (interleukin-6).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Correlation analysis of ME with a mild, moderate, and severe degree and ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule-1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Correlation analysis of ME with a mild, moderate, and severe degree and VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1).

4. Discussion

BRVO is a highly frequent vascular disorder of the retina found in people with lifestyle-related conditions such as hypertension and arteriosclerosis. Several therapeutic techniques, including laser photocoagulation, have been attempted because the ME is the primary cause of visual impairment in BRVO, but no positive outcomes have been obtained. However, the development of treatments targeting VEGF transformed the therapy of ME. The ME significantly improves with anti-VEGF injection, indicating that VEGF plays a critical role in this disease related to BRVO [710]. In this study, a significantly positive correlation was observed between the severity of ME with the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor. Additionally, the percentages of patients with hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia were 53.45%, 34.48%, and 13.79%, respectively, which are all greater than the figures reported by O'Mahoney et al. [22]. The significant number of these patients in our study was attributable to their advanced age, ranging from 53 to 89 (mean age = 67.46 ± 8.35) years. Jialiang Zhao et al. [23] found that 99% of BRVO patients could find hardened arterioles on the surface of the venule at the obstructed site. In this study, the blockage of BRVO accounts for 65.52% in the supratemporal area and 34.48% in the infratemporal area. The obstruction was not found in the nasal side, which showed consistency with the proportion reported by Nakano E and Samara WA [24, 25].

According to the thickness of CMT, the severity of edema has been divided into three levels: mild, moderate, and severe. Correlations were evaluated using the Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis. Based on the data obtained (P > 0.05), no significant association was identified between BCVA and the degree of ME in patients. However, Ryu et al. [26] demonstrated a strong correlation between baseline BCVA and CMT, in contrast to our findings. The finding of our study indicates that the degree of BCVA and ME are not significantly associated, which is similar to the findings of Fujino et al. [27]. This may be because ME traction compromises the integrity of the ellipsoidal zone or that various pathological substances produced during ME formation and development accumulate in the macular area throughout the disease, impairing the ellipsoidal zone's function and the patient's BCVA being correspondingly low. Since long-term edema causes structural damage, the duration of the edema may affect visual function. However, if the ME is restricted to the outer plexiform and inner nuclear layers without affecting the ellipsoid zone, the patient's BCVA will often remain stable. Thus, the change in BCVA has no association with the change in CMT thickness but is directly tied to the ellipsoid belt's function and integrity [27, 28].

BCVA was observed to have no significant correlation with VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, or VCAM-1 expression levels in the aqueous humor (P > 0.05). This could be because the level of cytokines expressed in aqueous humor does not correctly reflect the real state of the retina, as the level of cytokines expressed in the aqueous humor is modified by their diffusion rate and interaction with the extracellular matrix. The damage of cytokines and their cascades to photoreceptors and neurons in the inner layer of the retina cannot be synchronized [26]. Therefore, there is no apparent correlation between BCVA and the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor.

Herein, the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in the aqueous humor varied with the mild, moderate, and severe degrees of ME. The Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated a significantly positive linkage between mild, moderate, and severe ME degrees and the VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 expression levels in the aqueous humor (P < 0.05).

The present study revealed a significantly positive link between VEGF and the degree of mild, moderate, and severe ME, and the correlation coefficients were all above 0.8 (P < 0.0001). The reason is that retinal ischemia and hypoxia in the occlusion area after BRVO promotes the strong expression of VEGF, which specifically binds to its receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2), increases vascular permeability, and upregulates the expression levels of VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and other inflammatory cytokines, leading to hypoxia-induced inflammation, and further aggravates the degree of ME through multiple positive feedback loops. Chronic, persistent, and refractory ME is caused by a cascade of hypoxia and inflammatory reactions [8]. Thus, VEGF is the primary initiating and mediating factor in the onset and progression of ME [8, 2731]. Additionally, the reported studies have shown that decreasing VEGF expression can disrupt the downstream positive feedback loop, considerably reduce CMT, and enhance the visual function of BRVO-ME patients [8, 13, 16].

The current study used the same detection methods and reagents as reported by Noma et al. [8, 13] to detect the VEGF value. According to the findings of Noma et al. [8, 13], the VEGF value of the vitreous humor in typical cases is 15.6 pg/ml in mild ischemia, 30–40 pg/ml in mild no perfusion; 338 pg/ml in moderate ischemia, 300 pg/ml or higher in moderate no perfusion; 2570 pg/ml for severe ischemia, and 2000–3000 pg/ml for severe non-perfusion. While in our results, the VEGF value of aqueous humor was found to be 29.29 (13.95, 67.74) pg/ml in mild, 73.85 (72.25, 81.95) pg/ml in moderate, and 90.34 (16.14, 219.11) pg/ml in severe ischemia. In brief, the aqueous humor VEGF value is slightly lower than the vitreous humor VEGF value. Compared with the above standards, the patients in this study were in a state of mild ischemia and mild no perfusion.

Herein, we found that the expression level of IL-6 was positively correlated with the degree of mild, moderate, and severe ME (P < 0.001). The reason is that IL-6 can directly induce an elevated expression of VEGF levels and increase the permeability of blood vessels; IL-6 can reduce the expression levels of intercellular connexins and occludins, change the connections between cells, and increase the permeability of blood vessels [6, 8, 17]. A significantly positive correlation has been found between the expression level of IL-6 and the duration of BRVO-ME. The expression level of IL-6 is an important predictor of the transition from ischemia-hypoxia to inflammation. IL-6 is crucial for the transition from acute inflammation to chronic inflammation, linking the inflammatory process and angiogenesis [6, 8, 17, 3235].

The severity of mild, moderate, and severe ME was strongly linked with ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 (P < 0.05). However, the relevant parameters did not differ between the two. ICAM-1 is primarily involved in cell adhesion. By activating VEGFR-2, VEGF increases the expression of ICAM-1 and mediates the adhesion of leukocytes to the retinal vascular endothelium. The more this gene is expressed, the more leukocytes roll and stick to the walls of blood vessels, which can lead to blood stagnation. Simultaneously, abnormal adhesion to vascular endothelial cells and capturing leukocytes can increase the leakage of retinal capillaries and aggravate the degree of edema of ME [6, 8, 13]. VCAM-1 primarily mediates the adhesion between blood vessels. Its upregulation can cause retinal capillary leakage, which in turn leads to the formation of non-perfused areas (NPAs) and neovascularization (NV) [6, 8, 13, 3537]. Although it has been reported [8, 3740] that compared with ICAM-1, the increased expression of VCAM-1 is more closely related to the degree of ischemia and hypoxia of the retina and the formation of NPAs and NV. However, the degree of retinal ischemia and hypoxia and the formation of NPAs and NV may result from a variety of factors. We found that both ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 increased with the degree of ME; it was clinically difficult to determine whether ICAM-1 or VCAM-1 was more involved.

5. Limitations of the Study

The sample size included in this study was relatively small, and the collected cytokines were few. Furthermore, only the cytokine expression levels of BRVO-ME patients before IRI were analyzed. Thus, more samples are needed and expected for multicentre research.

6. Conclusion

VEGF promotes vascular permeability by increasing the phosphorylation of tight junction proteins. This chemokine is used by inflammatory cells to trigger positive feedback loops, aggravating ischemia and hypoxia in the retina, damaging the BRB, and causing leakage, resulting in chronic recurrent ME. IL-6 can be used as a diagnostic or therapeutic target for shifting from ischemia-hypoxia to inflammation and chronicity. Overexpression of ICAM-1, a marker for retinal vascular endothelial cell activation, can increase leukocyte chemotaxis and adhesion, causing leukocyte stasis and even blood flow stagnation, exacerbating obstruction, and widening the obstruction range. Atypical leukocyte adherence to the vascular endothelium can exacerbate retinal leakage in ME. VCAM-1 stimulates leukocyte chemotaxis to the inflammatory site and attaches to the vascular endothelium, damaging it. When overexpressed, it causes retinal vascular endothelial cells to become active. As a result, NPA and NV may arise. In a positive feedback loop, the ME is associated with VEGF, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1. Lowering the level of disease-associated cytokines maybe potentially reduce the degree of ME. Therefore, an in-depth study of the levels and the relationship may provide some evidence for the pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of BRVO-ME.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the 2021 Dongcheng District Health Science & Technology Plan Project (East Health Research [2021]-7), the 2018 Beijing TCM Science & Technology Development Fund project (JJ2018-20), and the 2018 Capital Characteristic Applied Research Project (Z181100001718085).

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

Chengyi Zhu and Lanlan Pan are both equivalent first authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Son bg P., Xu Y., Zha M., Zhang Y., Rudan I. Global epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. Journal of Global Health . 2019;9(1) doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010427.010427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rogers S., McIntosh R. L., Cheung N., et al. The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology . 2010;117(2):313–319.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou J. Q., Xu L., Wang S., et al. The 10-year incidence and risk factors of retinal vein occlusion: the Beijing eye study. Ophthalmology . 2013;120(4):803–808. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gurram M. M. Effect of posterior sub-tenon triamcinolone in macular edema due to non-ischemic vein occlusions. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research . 2013;7(12):2821–2824. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6473.3766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hayreh S. S., Zimmerman M. B. Branch retinal vein occlusion: natural history of visual outcome. JAMA Ophthalmology . 2014;132(1):13–22. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li J., Paulus Y. M., Shuai Y., Fang W., Liu Q., Yuan S. New developments in the classification, pathogenesis, risk factors, natural history, and treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion. Journal of Ophthalmology . 2017;2017:18. doi: 10.1155/2017/4936924.4936924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Okawada H., Saito Y., Iwabuchi S. Relationship between vascular endothelial growth factor and macular edema in retinal vein branch obstruction. Clinical Ophthalmology . 2018;12:1379–1382. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S159109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Noma H., Yasuda K., Shimura M. Cytokines and the pathogenesis of macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Journal of Ophthalmology . 2019;2019:9. doi: 10.1155/2019/5185128.5185128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Noma H., Yasuda K., Shimura M. Cytokines and pathogenesis of central retinal vein occlusion. Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2020;9(11):p. 3457. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Noma H., Funatsu H., Mimura T., Harino S., Hori S. Aqueous humor levels of vasoactive molecules correlate with vitreous levels and macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion. European Journal of Ophthalmology . 2010;20(2):402–409. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noma H., Funatsu H., Mimura T., Harino S., Sone T., Hori S. Increase of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-6 in the aqueous humour of patients with macular oedema and central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmologica . 2010;88(6):646–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01524.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sohn H. J., Han D. H., Lee D. Y., Nam D. H. Changes in aqueous cytokines after intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for macular oedema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmologica . 2014;92(3):e217–224. doi: 10.1111/aos.12219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Noma H., Mimura T., Yasuda K., Shimura M. Possible molecular basis of bevacizumab therapy for macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion. Retina . 2016;36(9):1718–1725. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000000983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cehofski L. J., Honoré B., Vorum H. A review: proteomics in retinal artery occlusion, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy and acquired macular disorders. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2017;18(5):p. 907. doi: 10.3390/ijms18050907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ebneter A., Kokona D., Schneider N., Zinkernagel M. S. Microglia activation and recruitment of circulating macrophages during ischemic experimental branch retinal vein occlusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science . 2017;58(2):944–953. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wei Q., Sun T., Wan Z., Zhang Y., Peng Q. Cytokine and chemokine profile changes in patients after intravitreal conbercept injection for center macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion. American Journal of Translational Research . 2020;12(7):4001–4008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee W. J., Kang M. H., Seong M., Cho H. Y. Comparison of aqueous concentrations of angiogenic and inflammatory cytokines in diabetic macular oedema and macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion. British Journal of Ophthalmology . 2012;96(11):1426–1430. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ascaso F. J., Huerva V., Grzybowski A. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of macular edema secondary to retinal vascular diseases. Mediators of Inflammation . 2014;2014:6. doi: 10.1155/2014/432685.432685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hayreh S. S., Rojas P., Podhajsky P., Montague P., Woolson R. F. Ocular neovascularization with retinal vascular occlusion-III. Ophthalmology . 1983;90(5):488–506. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34542-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li X., Wang N., Liang X., et al. Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients: randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology . 2018;256(1):59–69. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3831-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang H. R., Wang X., Lu X. R., Yang Y. F., Liu F. Measurement of macular edema in retinal vein occlusion using optical coherence tomography and its visual prognosis. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi . 2005;41(10):910–916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O’Mahoney P. R. A., Wong D. T., Ray J. G. Retinal vein occlusion and traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis. Archives of Ophthalmology . 2008;126(5):692–699. doi: 10.1001/archopht.126.5.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao J., Sastry S. M., Sperduto R. D., et al. Arteriovenous crossing patterns in branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology . 1993;100(3):423–428. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31633-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nakano E., Ota T., Jingami Y., Nakata I., Hayashi H., Yamashiro K. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers after anti-VEGF treatment for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmologica . 2018;240(4):229–234. doi: 10.1159/000490809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Samara W. A., Shahlaee A., Sridhar J., Khan M. A., Ho A. C., Hsu J. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography features and visual function in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. American Journal of Ophthalmology . 2016;166:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ryu G., Noh D., van Hemert J., Sadda S. R., Sagong M. Relationship between distribution and severity of non-perfusion and cytokine levels and macular thickness in branch retinal vein occlusion. Scientific Reports . 2021;11(1):p. 271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79522-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fujino R., Asaoka R., Aoki S., et al. The usefulness of the retinal sensitivity measurement with a microperimetry for predicting the visual prognosis of branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology . 2020;258(9):1949–1958. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04759-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hua R., Li C., Hu Y., Chen L. The discrepancy between central foveal thickness and best corrected visual acuity in cystoid macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion after intravitreal lucentis® injection. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy . 2015;12(2):310–313. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yong H. F., Qi H., Wu Y. J., Wu Q. Q., Zuo L. Research progress on the pathogenesis of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion and the effect of macular edema on visual function. International Journal of Ophthalmology . 2019;19:1888–1891. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li X., Bai Y. Refocusing on the etiology and pathology of retinal vein occlusion to guide clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases . 2018;34:205–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Matsushima R., Noma H., Yasuda K., Goto H., Shimura M. Role of cytokines in ranibizumab therapy for macular edema in patients with central retinal vein occlusion. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics . 2019;35(7):407–412. doi: 10.1089/jop.2019.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hirano Y., Suzuki N., Tomiyasu T., et al. Multimodal imaging of microvascular abnormalities in retinal vein occlusion. Journal of Clinical Medicine . 2021;10(3):p. 405. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Abraham J. R., Wykoff C. C., Arepalli S., et al. Aqueous cytokine expression and higher order OCT biomarkers: assessment of the anatomic-biologic bridge in the IMAGINE DME study. American Journal of Ophthalmology . 2021;222:328–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mesquida M., Leszczynska A., Llorenç V., Adán A. Interleukin-6 blockade in ocular inflammatory diseases. Clinical and Experimental Immunology . 2014;176(3):301–309. doi: 10.1111/cei.12295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu J., Zhong Y., Yue S., et al. Aqueous humor mediator and cytokine aberrations in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disease Markers . 2019;2019:12. doi: 10.1155/2019/6928524.6928524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hillier R. J., Ojaimi E., Wong D. T., et al. Aqueous humor cytokine levels as biomarkers of disease severity in diabetic macular edema. Retina . 2017;37(4):761–769. doi: 10.1097/iae.0000000000001210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y., Shen J., Fortmann S. D., Wang J., Vestweber D., Campochiaro P. A. Reversible retinal vessel closure from VEGF-induced leukocyte plugging. JCI Insight . 2017;2(18) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.95530.e95530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hillier R. J., Ojaimi E., Wong D. T., et al. Aqueous humor cytokine levels and anatomic response to intravitreal ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema. JAMA Ophthalmology . 2018;136(4):382–388. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li C. S., Chang B., Miao R., et al. Early intervention of Didang Decoction on the expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in the retina of diabetic rats. Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine . 2013;32:2129–2134. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li C. S., Miao R., Cai Q., Zhou T., Tan J. Z., Wu X. R. The role of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 in diabetic retinopathy. International Eye Science . 2012;12:1–3. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES