Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Oct 1;33(10):e13853. doi: 10.1111/pai.13853

PM2 .5, PM10 and bronchiolitis severity: A cohort study

Gregorio P Milani 1,2,, Marco Cafora 1,3, Chiara Favero 1, Anna Luganini 4, Michele Carugno 1,5, Erica Lenzi 1, Anna Pistocchi 3, Eva Pinatel 6, Luigi Pariota 7, Luca Ferrari 1,5, Valentina Bollati 1,5
PMCID: PMC9827836  PMID: 36282132

Abstract

Background

A few studies suggest that particulate matter (PM) exposure might play a role in bronchiolitis. However, available data are mostly focused on the risk of hospitalization and come from retrospective studies that provided conflicting results. This prospective study investigated the association between PM (PM2.5 and PM10) exposure and the severity of bronchiolitis.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2019 and February 2020 at the pediatric emergency department of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca′ Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. Infants <1 year of age with bronchiolitis were eligible. The bronchiolitis severity score was assessed in each infant and a nasal swab was collected to detect respiratory viruses. The daily PM10 and PM2.5 exposure in the 29 preceding days were considered. Adjusted regression models were employed to evaluate the association between the severity score and PM10 and PM2.5 exposure.

Results

A positive association between the PM2.5 levels and the severity score was found at day‐2 (β 0.0214, 95% CI 0.0011–0.0417, p = .0386), day‐5 (β 0.0313, 95% CI 0.0054–0.0572, p = .0179), day‐14 (β 0.0284, 95% CI 0.0078–0.0490, p = .0069), day‐15 (β 0.0496, 95% CI 0.0242–0.0750, p = .0001) and day‐16 (β 0.0327, 95% CI 0.0080–0.0574, p = .0093).Similar figures were observed considering the PM10 exposure and limiting the analyses to infants with respiratory syncytial virus.

Conclusion

This study shows for the first time a direct association between PM2.5 and PM10 levels and the severity of bronchiolitis.

Keywords: air pollution, bronchiolitis, environment, infants, particulate matter, respiratory syncytial virus, severity


Key Message.

Some studies suggested that particulate matter (PM) exposure might play a role in bronchiolitis. However, available data come mainly from retrospective studies and provide conflicting results. Our prospective cohort study showed for the first time a direct association between PM (PM2.5 and PM10) exposure and the severity of bronchiolitis.

1. BACKGROUND

The association between air pollution and chronic respiratory diseases is well established in adults and the elderly. 1 , 2 Increasing data suggest that this association might occur also among children. 3 , 4 , 5 Moreover, a few studies suggest that particulate matter (PM) might be implicated in the development of bronchiolitis in infancy. 6 , 7 PM exposure might modulate viral infectivity, alter cytokine expression and impair the phagocytic ability of immune cells, thus enhancing the infection burden on the infant. 8 , 9

However, epidemiological studies on PM and bronchiolitis have provided partially conflicting data. 6 A meta‐analysis published in 2018 pooled data from 8 studies to verify the association between particulate matter and risk of hospitalization for bronchiolitis and concluded that the effects of PM10 were unclear, whereas increased PM2.5 levels were not associated with a higher risk of hospitalization. 10

One of the principal limitations of the available evidence is that it mainly comes from retrospective data or from International Classification of Diseases codes‐based studies, and it is mostly focused on the risk of hospitalization. 6 , 11 Therefore, prospective cohort studies including clinical data from individual patients with different degrees of bronchiolitis severity would be of great importance to gauge the hypothesis of an association between PM and bronchiolitis.

Hence, the aim of this prospective cohort study was the investigate the association between PM (PM2.5 and PM10) exposure and the severity of bronchiolitis in infants.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study population and procedures

This prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2019 and February 2020 at the pediatric emergency department of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca′ Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy, a tertiary emergency department with more than 20,000 patients visited per year.

Eligible for this study were infants <1 year of age visiting the pediatric emergency department for bronchiolitis. The diagnosis of bronchiolitis was made in infants with a history of acute respiratory tract infection of the upper airways in the previous week, followed by an acute onset of respiratory distress, cough and diffuse crackles on auscultation. 12 Infants with underlying conditions potentially associated with a worse clinical course of bronchiolitis (e.g., infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia or on chronic treatment with immunosuppressants) were excluded.

At enrollment, all infants underwent a nasal swab by a trained researcher. Once collected, the nasal swabs were stored at −80°C until nucleic acids extraction for the PCR‐detection of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), the main cause of bronchiolitis in infancy. 13 In addition, the same trained researcher assessed the bronchiolitis severity score according to our standard protocol. 14 , 15 This score includes the evaluation of the following parameters: ambient air O2‐saturation (>95% = 0; 95–90% = 1; <90% = 2), respiratory rate (<45/min = 0; 45–60/min = 1; >60/min = 2), thoracic retractions (none = 0; present = 1; present and associated with nasal flare = 2) and ability to feed (normal = 0; reduced = 1; strongly reduced = 2). The results of each parameter are summed to define the disease severity as mild (<4), moderate (4–6) or severe (≥7). 12 , 16 All hospitalized infants were reevaluated every day until their discharge. If hospitalization was not required, mothers were advised to return to the emergency department in case of a worsening condition. A phone call after 7 days was performed to have confirmation that the clinical conditions had not worsened after discharge.

The most severe score assessed in each infant during the bronchiolitis episode was considered for the analyses.

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca′ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. Informed consent was obtained by the parents of the infants.

2.2. Data collection and classification

For each infant, the following information was collected: age, sex, birth weight and length, body weight and height at enrollment, ethnicity, residential address, delivery mode, current breastfeeding, history of antibiotics intake, allergy, daycare attendance, number of siblings and the presence of pets at home.

Moreover, age, educational level, current smoking, the presence of any chronic disease, treatment or allergy of both parents were registered and information on smoking during pregnancy, assumption of antibiotics during pregnancy or during breastfeeding and the result of Group B Streptococcus in vaginal swab at the end of the pregnancy was obtained from the mother.

2.3. Particulate matter exposure assessment

PM2.5 and PM10 (i.e., particulate matter with a particle size <2.5 or < 10 μm, respectively), exposure levels were obtained from the Open Data Lombardy Region (https://www.dati.lombardia.it) database, which contains daily mean estimates of municipal aggregate values calculated by the Regional Environmental Protection Agency (ARPA Lombardy). The assessment of the pollutant concentrations was based on the ARIA Regional Modeling (www.aria‐net.it), which is a chemical–physical model of air quality that simulates the dispersion and chemical reactions of atmospheric pollutants. It integrates the data measured from the monitoring stations of the ARPA Lombardy air quality network as well as meteorological data, emissions, concentrations at the beginning of the simulation period, and trends in adjacent areas, covering the whole Lombard territory with a grid of 1 × 1 km2 cells and providing daily mean estimates available from the website at municipality resolution. Each subject was assigned the daily PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations of the municipality of residence in the 29 days (day‐1 to day‐29) preceding the severity score retained for the analysis and of the Municipality of Milan for the day of recruitment (day‐0) or during hospitalization.

2.4. Laboratory analysis

Viral RNA was extracted from nasal swabs using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified RNA was eluted in 50 μl and immediately stored at −80°C. For the quantification of RSV‐RNA levels, a commercial real‐time RT‐qPCR kit was used (PrimerDesign™ genesig; PrimerDesign Ltd., Southampton, Hants, UK) and the qPCR were conducted using a QuantStudio3 real‐time PCR system (Applied Biosystem). A standard curve and template negative controls (sterile water) were included on each plate.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Summary statistics of study subjects' characteristics were reported in terms of frequency and percentage for categorical variables and in terms of mean and standard deviation or median and first quartile—third quartile as appropriate for continuous variables. The normal distribution of continuous variables was tested by graphical inspection and by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.

With regards to the effect of PM10 and PM2.5 on bronchiolitis severity, univariate and multivariable ordinal logistic regression models were fitted. The response variable was the score, using 7 ordinal categories. To evaluate short‐term PM exposure, pollutant levels were retrieved as daily means up to 2 days before the day of the enrollment and as averages over 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 1 month; we also calculated the average of PM levels in the first, second, third and fourth week. Multivariable analyses were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, use of antibiotics during pregnancy and use of antibiotics in the last month. Potential confounders were included in the multivariate model after verifying the presence of an association in a univariate model.

Estimated effects are reported as β and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with an increase of 1 μg/m3 in PM exposure. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.). A two‐sided p‐value of .05 was considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

A total of 161 infants with bronchiolitis visited the pediatric emergency department of Fondazione IRCCS Ca′ Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy, during the study period. Thirty‐seven were not eligible due to underlying conditions potentially associated with a worse clinical course of bronchiolitis and 14 did not accept to participate. Hence, a total of 110 infants (mean age 6.3 ± 5.5 months, 61% males) with bronchiolitis were finally included. The baseline characteristics of these subjects are given in Table 1. RSV was detected in 64 (58%) of the 110 infants. The bronchiolitis severity score was mild in 75 (68%), moderate in 34 (31%) and severe in one (0.6%) subject. Among infants with RSV, bronchiolitis was mild in 39 (61%) and moderate in 25 (39%) (Figure 1). Data regarding the mother and the father of the included subjects are reported in Table 2. The mean levels of PM10 and PM2.5 for each time lag preceding the severity peak are given in Table S1.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the study participants (N = 110). For some variables, percentage total slightly differs from 100% due to rounding effect

Characteristics
Age, months mean ± SD 6.3 ± 5.5
Sex, N (%)
Males 67 (61)
Females 43 (39)
Birth weight, kg mean ± SD 3.204 ± 0.550
Birth length, cm mean ± SD 49.6 ± 2.2
Gestational age, median [Q1–Q3] 38 [38–40]
Weight, kg mean ± SD 7.2 ± 2.2
Length, cm mean ± SD 64.8 ± 10.0
Living area, N (%)
City of Milan 73 (66)
Province of Milan, outside city area 35 (32)
Other provinces 2 (1.8)
Ethnicity, N (%)
Caucasian 87 (79)
African 6 (5.4)
Asian 11 (10)
Multi‐ethnic 6 (5.4)
Delivery mode, N (%)
Vaginal delivery 68 (62)
Vacuum 5 (4.6)
Elective cesarean section 25 (23)
Emergency cesarean section 12 (11)
Systemic antibiotic after birth, N (%)
Yes 25 (23)
No 85 (77)
Systemic antibiotic in the last month, N (%)
Yes 6 (5.4)
No 104 (95)
Allergy, N (%)
Yes 3 (2.8)
No 107 (97)
Daycare attendance, N (%)
Yes 26 (24)
No 84 (76)
Siblings, N (%)
Yes 80 (73)
No 30 (27)
Number of siblings, N (%)
0 31 (28)
1 50 (45)
2 23 (21)
3 6 (5.5)
Siblings attending daycare/school, N (%)
Yes 83 (75)
No 27 (25)
Pets at home, N (%)
Yes 25 (23)
No 85 (77)
Current breastfeeding, N (%)
Yes 69 (63)
No 41 (37)

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Bronchiolitis severity score in infants with and without respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of parents of the study participants (N = 110). For some variables, percentage total slightly differs from 100% due to rounding effect

Mothers Fathers
Age, years, mean ± SD 34.8 ± 5.6 37.1 ± 6.3
Education, N (%)
Elementary school 5 (4.6) 1 (0.9)
Junior high school 14 (13) 18 (16)
High school 29 (27) 38 (35)
University 62 (56) 53 (48)
Smoking, N (%)
Yes 10 (9.2) 41 (37)
No 100 (91) 69 (63)
Maternal smoking during pregnancy, N (%)
Yes 7 (6.4)
No 103 (94)
Chronic diseases, N (%)
Yes 31 (28) 13 (12)
No 79 (72) 97 (88)
Allergy, N (%)
Yes 43 (39) 30 (27)
No 67 (61) 80 (73)
Systemic antibiotics during pregnancy, N (%)
Yes 27 (25)
No 83 (75)
Systemic antibiotics during breastfeeding, N (%)
Yes 12 (11)
No 98 (89)
Vaginal swab for Group B Streptococcus, N (%)
Positive 14 (14)
Negative 89 a (86)
a

Information was not available for 7 mothers.

Results from univariate analyses of variables associated with bronchiolitis severity scores are given in the supplementary online tables (Tables S2 and S3). PM2.5 was positively associated with the bronchiolitis severity score on day‐2 (β 0.0214, 95% CI 0.0011–0.0417, p = .0386), on day‐5 (β 0.0313, 95% CI 0.0054–0.0572, p = .0179), on day‐14 (β 0.0284, 95% CI 0.0078–0.0490, p = .0069), on day‐15 (β 0.0496, 95% CI 0.0242–0.0750, p = .0001) and on day‐16 (β 0.0327, 95% CI 0.0080–0.0574, p = .0093). PM10 was positively associated with the bronchiolitis severity score on day‐2 (β 0.0171 95% CI 0.0015–0.0326, p = .0317), on day‐5 (β 0.0268, 95% CI 0.0067–0.0469, p = .0091), on day‐14 (β 0.0220, 95% CI 0.0062–0.0379, p = .0065), on day‐15 (β 0.0356, 95% CI 0.0167–0.0545, p = .0002) and on day‐16 (β 0.0230, 95% CI 0.0049–0.0412, p = .0128).

Adjusted models returned very similar results (Table 3). A significant association with the PM2.5 and PM10 mean levels during the third week before the assessment and the bronchiolitis severity score was observed (β 0.0426, 95% CI 0.0173–0.0679, p = .0010; β 0.0478, 95% CI 0.0159–0.0797, p = .0034, respectively). Similar figures were observed considering only PM2.5 and PM10 exposure and bronchiolitis severity score of infants with bronchiolitis due to RSV infection (Table S4).

TABLE 3.

Association between exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 and bronchiolitis severity score (N = 110 case of bronchiolitis)

PM10 β SE 95% CI p‐value PM2.5 β SE 95% CI p‐value
Day 0 0.0099 0.0090 −0.0077 0.0275 .2684 Day 0 0.0067 0.0110 −0.0148 0.0283 .5399
Day −1 0.0131 0.0078 −0.0022 0.0283 .0932 Day −1 0.0116 0.0092 −0.0065 0.0297 .2089
Day − 2 0.0175 0.0083 0.0013 0.0338 .0347 Day − 2 0.0214 0.0104 0.0011 0.0417 .0386
Day −3 0.0051 0.0074 −0.0094 0.0197 .4876 Day −3 0.0070 0.0099 −0.0124 0.0263 .4802
Day −4 0.0125 0.0086 −0.0044 0.0295 .1462 Day −4 0.0112 0.0100 −0.0083 0.0308 .2601
Day − 5 0.0333 0.0114 0.0109 0.0557 .0036 Day − 5 0.0313 0.0132 0.0054 0.0572 .0179
Day −6 0.0088 0.0094 −0.0097 0.0272 .3504 Day −6 0.0040 0.0115 −0.0185 0.0265 .7279
Day −7 0.0049 0.0096 −0.0139 0.0237 .6101 Day −7 −0.0032 0.0120 −0.0267 0.0204 .7929
Day −8 0.0067 0.0095 −0.0119 0.0252 .4813 Day −8 0.0035 0.0109 −0.0180 0.0249 .7506
Day −9 0.0061 0.0096 −0.0128 0.0249 .5287 Day −9 0.0047 0.0122 −0.0192 0.0285 .7009
Day −10 0.0067 0.0087 −0.0103 0.0237 .4387 Day −10 0.0097 0.0106 −0.0110 0.0304 .3589
Day −11 0.0021 0.0075 −0.0126 0.0168 .7799 Day −11 0.0029 0.0097 −0.0162 0.0220 .7652
Day −12 0.0136 0.0082 −0.0025 0.0297 .0985 Day −12 0.0143 0.0100 −0.0053 0.0339 .1520
Day − 13 0.0205 0.0095 0.0018 0.0392 .0321 Day −13 0.0190 0.0114 −0.0034 0.0414 .0962
Day − 14 0.0268 0.0089 0.0093 0.0443 .0026 Day − 14 0.0284 0.0105 0.0078 0.0490 .0069
Day − 15 0.0477 0.0107 0.0268 0.0686 <.0001 Day − 15 0.0496 0.0130 0.0242 0.0750 .0001
Day − 16 0.0336 0.0101 0.0139 0.0534 .0008 Day − 16 0.0327 0.0126 0.0080 0.0574 .0093
Day − 17 0.0234 0.0109 0.0021 0.0447 .0315 Day −17 0.0250 0.0137 −0.0019 0.0518 .0681
Day −18 0.0139 0.0088 −0.0034 0.0311 .1154 Day −18 0.0145 0.0110 −0.0071 0.0361 .1890
Day −19 0.0179 0.0104 −0.0025 0.0383 .0855 Day −19 0.0204 0.0130 −0.0051 0.0459 .1176
Day −20 0.0193 0.0103 −0.0010 0.0395 .0621 Day −20 0.0238 0.0134 −0.0024 0.0500 .0754
Day −21 0.0059 0.0097 −0.0130 0.0249 .5381 Day −21 0.0049 0.0125 −0.0196 0.0293 .6956
Day −22 0.0033 0.0091 −0.0144 0.0211 .7134 Day −22 −0.0030 0.0124 −0.0273 0.0213 .8091
Day −23 −0.0006 0.0092 −0.0186 0.0175 .9510 Day −23 0.0021 0.0122 −0.0219 0.0260 .8656
Day −24 0.0044 0.0093 −0.0139 0.0227 .6373 Day −24 0.0046 0.0118 −0.0185 0.0278 .6952
Day −25 0.0056 0.0090 −0.0120 0.0232 .5344 Day −25 0.0092 0.0113 −0.0129 0.0313 .4146
Day −26 0.0033 0.0086 −0.0135 0.0202 .6975 Day −26 −0.0019 0.0109 −0.0232 0.0195 .8641
Day −27 −0.0041 0.0089 −0.0215 0.0134 .6479 Day −27 −0.0033 0.0111 −0.0251 0.0185 .7675
Day −28 0.0079 0.0080 −0.0077 0.0235 .3225 Day −28 0.0122 0.0105 −0.0085 0.0329 .2473
Day −29 0.0056 0.0091 −0.0122 0.0234 .5381 Day −29 0.0095 0.0114 −0.0129 0.0319 .4078
‐1st week AVG (Day 0–6) 0.0235 0.0117 0.0005 0.0466 .0449 ‐1st week AVG (Day 0–6) 0.0235 0.0143 −0.0046 0.0516 .1012
‐2nd week AVG (Day −7 ‐13) 0.0151 0.0119 −0.0082 0.0384 .2040 ‐2nd week AVG (Day −7 ‐13) 0.0150 0.0147 −0.0138 0.0438 .3064
‐3rd week AVG (Day − 14 ‐20) 0.0426 0.0129 0.0173 0.0679 .0010 ‐3rd week AVG (Day − 14 ‐20) 0.0478 0.0163 0.0159 0.0797 .0034
‐4th week AVG (Day −21 ‐27) 0.0032 0.0110 −0.0184 0.0248 .7688 ‐4th week AVG (Day −21 ‐27) 0.0030 0.0143 −0.0251 0.0311 .8327
−2 week AVG (Day 0–13) 0.0284 0.0143 0.0003 0.0565 .0473 −2 week AVG (Day 0–13) 0.0289 0.0177 −0.0058 0.0635 .1025
−3 week AVG (Day 0–20) 0.0425 0.0154 0.0122 0.0728 .0059 −3 week AVG (Day 0–20) 0.0051 0.0094 −0.0133 0.0234 .5890
−4 week AVG (Day 0–27) 0.0318 0.0151 0.0023 0.0614 .0348 −4 week AVG (Day 0–27) 0.0336 0.0191 −0.0038 0.0709 .0782

Note: β (95% CIs) at different time lags (from the day of the nasal swab to the previous 30 days) and for different 7‐day moving average are calculated for a 1 μg/m3 increase in PM. Beta regression coefficients were estimated from multivariate continuous ordinal regression models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, assumption of systemic antibiotics during pregnancy and assumption of systemic antibiotics in the last month.

Significant associations are reported in bold.

4. DISCUSSION

Bronchiolitis is the main cause of hospitalization in infants. Although a few risk factors (e.g., pre‐existing pulmonary diseases) are recognized, most cases occur in previously healthy infants without predisposing risk factors. 17 This prospective cohort study showed for the first time a significant association between PM2.5 and PM10 levels and the severity of bronchiolitis.

Previous retrospective studies investigating the association between the risk of hospitalization or number of clinical encounter for infants with bronchiolitis and exposure to PM ended with inconsistent results. A study performed in the United States on ~20,000 infants found very limited support for a link between the acute increase of PM2.5 and bronchiolitis hospitalization. 18 A further study conducted in Canada on approximately 11,000 infants found that exposure to PM10 and PM2.5 had no association with inpatient or outpatient clinical encounter for bronchiolitis. 19 On the other hand, studies conducted in Italy, Israel and France found a positive association between the risk of hospitalization and exposure to PM ≤10 μm in infants with bronchiolitis. 6 , 20 , 21 , 22 This association was also observed in a study conducted in Hong Kong on >29,000 subjects. 23 Finally, a study conducted on about 12,000 infants hospitalized for RSV bronchiolitis found that exposure to PM2.5 and PM10, together with other air pollutants might explain >20% of the hospitalizations. 24 In this study, which includes individual data of all infants visiting the pediatric emergency department, we were able to observe a positive association between the exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 and bronchiolitis severity thus confirming the potential role of PM in bronchiolitis. Moreover, such association was observed in the few days before the severity score assessment or about 2 to 3 weeks before. These observations deserve some consideration.

It has been speculated that the air pollutants and especially PM might play a key role in the viral spread and transmission. 25 , 26

It is known that after the infection, bronchiolitis symptoms peak occurs roughly within 2 weeks. 6 , 27 The positive association between the levels of PM2.5 and PM10 about 2 weeks preceding the symptoms peak corroborates the hypothesis that high levels of PM might increase the viral load reaching the patient's airways. 25 , 26 Growing evidence points out that PM2.5 and PM10 cause airways inflamation 28 , 29 by stimulating the release of pro‐inflammatory‐ cytokines (e.g., IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐8 and IL‐33). 29 , 30 , 31 High levels of airways inflammation are associated with severe bronchiolitis, in turn. 32 , 33 These data might explain the positive association found in this study between the severity of bronchiolitis and the levels of PM2.5 and PM10 exposure also in the few days preceding the severity peak. Overall, this study suggests a mediating role of PM in different stages of bronchiolitis (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Hypothesis linking PM exposure and bronchiolitis severity

Based on our data, we speculate that personalized preventive measures might be developed for infants at risk of severe bronchiolitis. In particular, strategies to limit the spread of respiratory viruses (e.g., limiting the time spent in potentially contagious settings) or to reduce airways inflammation (e.g., preventively using inhaled anti‐inflammatory molecules) might be performed in the days following high levels of PM2.5 and PM10 exposure. These hypotheses should be tested in future prospective studies.

It is recognized that climate has an impact on air pollutant concentrations. 34 Recent observations suggest that climate change and especially increased temperatures are associated with PM peaks in the atmosphere. 35 , 36 The results of this study and the current context of global warming point out that increasing efforts should be addressed to raise awareness among parents, healthcare providers and public authorities on the possible role of PM on infant health and to limit its production.

This study has some limitations: first, it included only infants with bronchiolitis visiting the emergency department. Therefore, infants managed by primary care physicians or by pediatricians in private practice were not considered. Second, the study included a limited number of patients from a single center. Finally, we did not evaluate the possible role of chronic exposure to PM2.5 and PM10. Yet, the study has important strengths. All clinical data were prospectively collected. Several confounding factors for bronchiolitis severity were controlled. Furthermore, the study was conducted immediately before the COVID‐19 outbreak in Italy and therefore there was no potential confounding effect of exceptional preventive measures (e.g., homebound, social distancing, use of facial masks or school closure) applied during the first wave of the pandemic. 37

In conclusion, this study shows a direct association between PM2.5 and PM10 levels and the severity of bronchiolitis. Levels of PM might modulate the viral load and the airways inflammation. Future studies should investigate whether preventive strategies, applied to very high‐risk infants in the days following high levels of PM2.5 and PM10 exposure might reduce the burden of this disease.

FUNDING INFORMATION

The study was supported by a grant from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2017, 2017HWPZZZ_001).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Supporting information

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

Table S4

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Dr. Marco Alberzoni for his support. Open Access funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Milano within the CRUI‐CARE Agreement.

Milani GP, Cafora M, Favero C, et al. PM2 .5, PM10 and bronchiolitis severity: A cohort study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022;33:e13853. doi: 10.1111/pai.13853

Editor: Ömer KalaycI

REFERENCES

  • 1. Pfeffer PE, Mudway IS, Grigg J. Air pollution and asthma: mechanisms of harm and considerations for clinical interventions. Chest. 2021;159(4):1346‐1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bontinck A, Maes T, Joos G. Asthma and air pollution: recent insights in pathogenesis and clinical implications. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2020;26(1):10‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Baek J, Kash BA, Xu X, Benden M, Roberts J, Carrillo G. Association between ambient air pollution and hospital length of stay among children with asthma in South Texas. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gass K, Klein M, Sarnat SE, et al. Associations between ambient air pollutant mixtures and pediatric asthma emergency department visits in three cities: a classification and regression tree approach. Environ Health. 2015;14:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Min KD, Yi SJ, Kim HC, et al. Association between exposure to traffic‐related air pollution and pediatric allergic diseases based on modeled air pollution concentrations and traffic measures in Seoul, Korea: a comparative analysis. Environ Health. 2020;19(1):6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Carugno M, Dentali F, Mathieu G, et al. PM10 exposure is associated with increased hospitalizations for respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis among infants in Lombardy. Italy Environ Res. 2018;166:452‐457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Girguis MS, Strickland MJ, Hu X, et al. Chronic PM(2.5) exposure and risk of infant bronchiolitis and otitis media clinical encounters. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017;220(6):1055‐1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mishra R, Krishnamoorthy P, Gangamma S, Raut AA, Kumar H. Particulate matter (PM[10]) enhances RNA virus infection through modulation of innate immune responses. Environ Pollut. 2020;266(Pt 1):115148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Domingo JL, Rovira J. Effects of air pollutants on the transmission and severity of respiratory viral infections. Environ Res. 2020;187:109650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. King C, Kirkham J, Hawcutt D, Sinha I. The effect of outdoor air pollution on the risk of hospitalisation for bronchiolitis in infants: a systematic review. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Girguis MS, Strickland MJ, Hu X, et al. Exposure to acute air pollution and risk of bronchiolitis and otitis media for preterm and term infants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2018;28(4):348‐357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Milani GP, Plebani AM, Arturi E, et al. Using a high‐flow nasal cannula provided superior results to low‐flow oxygen delivery in moderate to severe bronchiolitis. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105(8):E368‐E372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Azzari C, Baraldi E, Bonanni P, et al. Epidemiology and prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections in children in Italy. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47(1):198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Milani GP, Rocchi A, Teatini T, et al. Hyponatremia in infants with new onset moderate‐severe bronchiolitis: a cross‐sectional study. Respir Med. 2017;133:48‐50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Milani GP, Bollati V, Ruggiero L, et al. Bronchiolitis and SARS‐CoV‐2. Arch Dis Child. 2021;106(10):999‐1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Mazzoni MB, Milani GP, Bernardi S, et al. Hyponatremia in infants with community‐acquired infections on hospital admission. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Florin TA, Plint AC, Zorc JJ. Viral bronchiolitis. Lancet. 2017;389(10065):211‐224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Karr C, Lumley T, Shepherd K, et al. A case‐crossover study of wintertime ambient air pollution and infant bronchiolitis. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(2):277‐281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Karr CJ, Demers PA, Koehoorn MW, Lencar CC, Tamburic L, Brauer M. Influence of ambient air pollutant sources on clinical encounters for infant bronchiolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(10):995‐1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nenna R, Evangelisti M, Frassanito A, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis, weather conditions and air pollution in an Italian urban area: an observational study. Environ Res. 2017;158:188‐193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yitshak‐Sade M, Yudovitch D, Novack V, Tal A, Kloog I, Goldbart A. Air pollution and hospitalization for bronchiolitis among young children. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(12):1796‐1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Ségala C, Poizeau D, Mesbah M, Willems S, Maidenberg M. Winter air pollution and infant bronchiolitis in Paris. Environ Res. 2008;106(1):96‐100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Leung SY, Lau SYF, Kwok KL, Mohammad KN, Chan PKS, Chong KC. Short‐term association among meteorological variation, outdoor air pollution and acute bronchiolitis in children in a subtropical setting. Thorax. 2021;76(4):360‐369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wrotek A, Badyda A, Czechowski PO, Owczarek T, Dąbrowiecki P, Jackowska T. Air Pollutants' concentrations are associated with increased number of RSV hospitalizations in polish children. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Feng C, Li J, Sun W, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Impact of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure on the risk of influenza‐like‐illness: a time‐series analysis in Beijing, China. Environ Health. 2016;15:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Setti L, Passarini F, De Gennaro G, et al. Potential role of particulate matter in the spreading of COVID‐19 in northern Italy: first observational study based on initial epidemic diffusion. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e039338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Eiland LS. Respiratory syncytial virus: diagnosis, treatment and prevention. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2009;14(2):75‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Choi J, Sim JK, Oh JY, et al. Relationship between particulate matter (PM(10)) and airway inflammation measured with exhaled nitric oxide test in Seoul, Korea. Can Respir J. 2020;2020:1823405‐1823407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Arias‐Pérez RD, Taborda NA, Gómez DM, Narvaez JF, Porras J, Hernandez JC. Inflammatory effects of particulate matter air pollution. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020;27(34):42390‐42404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. De Grove KC, Provoost S, Brusselle GG, Joos GF, Maes T. Insights in particulate matter‐induced allergic airway inflammation: focus on the epithelium. Clin Exp Allergy. 2018;48(7):773‐786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Yang X, Zhang Y, Zhan X, et al. Particulate matter exposure is highly correlated to pediatric asthma exacerbation. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(13):17818‐17829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Pickles RJ, DeVincenzo JP. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and its propensity for causing bronchiolitis. J Pathol. 2015;235(2):266‐276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Vázquez Y, González L, Noguera L, et al. Cytokines in the respiratory airway as biomarkers of severity and prognosis for respiratory syncytial virus infection: an update. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kinney PL. Interactions of climate change, air pollution, and human health. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2018;5(1):179‐186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kalisa E, Fadlallah S, Amani M, Nahayo L, Habiyaremye G. Temperature and air pollution relationship during heatwaves in Birmingham. UK Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018;43:111‐120. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Leão MLP, Zhang L, da Silva Júnior FMR. Effect of particulate matter (PM(2.5) and PM(10)) on health indicators: climate change scenarios in a Brazilian metropolis. Environ Geochem Health. 2022;1‐12. doi: 10.1007/s10653-022-01331-8. Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Van Brusselen D, De Troeyer K, Ter Haar E, et al. Bronchiolitis in COVID‐19 times: a nearly absent disease? Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(6):1969‐1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

Table S4


Articles from Pediatric Allergy and Immunology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES