Abstract
Introduction
Heart failure (HF) symptoms improve through self-care, for which adherence remains low among patients despite the provision of education for these behaviours by clinical teams. Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support and Health Literacy (ODYSSEE–vCHAT) combines automated digital counselling with social network support to improve mortality and morbidity, engagement with self–care materials, and health-related quality of life.
Methods and analysis
Use of ODYSSEE-vCHAT via Internet-connected personal computer by 162 HF patients will be compared with a control condition over 22 months. The primary outcome is a composite index score of all-cause mortality, all-cause emergency department visits, and HF-related hospitalisation at trial completion. Secondary outcomes include individual components of the composite index, engagement with self-care materials, and patient-reported measures of physical and psychosocial well-being, disease management, health literacy, and substance use. Patients are recruited from tertiary care hospitals in Toronto, Canada and randomised on a 1:1 ratio to both arms of the trial. Online assessments occur at baseline (t=0), months 4, 8 and 12, and trial completion. Ordinal logistic regression analyses and generalised linear models will evaluate primary and secondary outcomes.
Ethics and dissemination
The trial has been approved by the research ethics boards at the University Health Network (20-5960), Sunnybrook Hospital (5117), and Mount Sinai Hospital (21-022-E). Informed consent of eligible patients occurs in person or online. Findings will be shared with key stakeholders and the public. Results will allow for the preparation of a Canada-wide phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of ODYSSEE-vCHAT in improving clinical outcomes and raising the standard of outpatient care.
Trial registration number
Keywords: Heart failure, Quality in health care, Telemedicine, World Wide Web technology, Clinical trials
Strengths and limitations of this study.
This multisite, single-blind, randomised clinical trial evaluates the efficacy of a novel automated digital counselling programme with integrated social network support (Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support and Health Literacy (ODYSSEE-vCHAT)) for heart failure (HF).
ODYSSEE-vCHAT is a patient-centred intervention: subjects communicate with healthcare professionals, patient representatives, and each other as they identify, set, and track personal goals for self-care.
-
ODYSSEE-vCHAT has the potential to improve outcomes of morORCID
bidity, mortality, and health-related quality of life while relieving the demand for outpatient health services.
This digital programme is not fully accessible to individuals with poor computer literacy; however, technical assistance and tutorial videos are available.
ODYSSEE-vCHAT is currently available only in English due to a lack of funding for language translations.
Introduction
Heart failure (HF) is a chronic progressive disease characterised by deterioration of the heart’s ability to pump blood to meet the metabolic demands of the body.1 An estimated 46% rise in prevalence is expected by 2030,2 making HF a major public health concern. Hospitalisation remains high, with over 50% of patients readmitted within 6 months of discharge.3 A 1-year mortality rate of 20–30% follows diagnosis, and a 45% mortality rate is estimated within 5 years.4 HF is also a significant cause of physical decline,5–7 psychological distress,8 social functioning,9 and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQL).10 An improvement in disease management and associated clinical and health status outcomes are a priority.
The cornerstone of HF management is self-care, which includes monitoring symptoms, following medication regimes, engaging in physical activity, and maintaining an adequate diet.11 Self-care adherence is associated with reduced mortality12–16 and increased HRQL.17 Healthcare professionals typically provide education for HF self-care during hospitalisation or clinic appointments, supported by physical handouts and digital resources such as telehealth programmes.18 Engagement in self-care behaviours remains low among patients despite this standard of care, with only 9–36% demonstrating moderate to high adherence.19 Two counselling methods for self-care are highlighted in the literature: motivational interviewing (MI), which improves adherence in diverse patient populations,20 and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), which promotes long-term behavioural change21 and psychological well-being.22 Moreover, peer support benefits self-care in patients with chronic conditions through perceived social support.23 24
Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support and Health Literacy (ODYSSEE-vCHAT) is a follow-up to our previous CHF-CePPORT (Canadian e-Platform to Promote Behavioral Self-Management in Chronic Heart Failure) trial,25 which found that engagement with an automated digital counselling programme for HF self-care versus a control condition evoked greater engagement with self-care materials over 12 months. ODYSSEE-vCHAT builds on CHF-CePPORT25 by supplementing its automated digital counselling method with social networking to promote self-care learning through peer support26 27 and reinforce positive role modelling through presentations.28 To our knowledge, this is the first digital self-care intervention for HF patients that combines components of MI and CBT with peer support. ODYSSEE-vCHAT has the potential to improve long-term self-care adherence and clinical outcomes of morbidity and mortality. This programme was developed during the global COVID-19 pandemic, which emphasised the importance of remote interventions given restrictions to face-to-face resources.29 Compared to a control condition of enhanced usual care (eUC), ODYSSEE-vCHAT is hypothesised to improve outcomes of mortality and morbidity, engagement with self-care materials, and HRQL.
Methods and analysis
Outcomes
The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of ODYSSEE-vCHAT in reducing a composite index of incident all-cause mortality, all-cause emergency department (ED) visits, and HF-related hospitalisation at trial completion (median=14 months, range=6-22 months).
Secondary outcomes include:
Incidence of each component of the composite index at trial completion.
Engagement with self-care materials at months 4, 8 and 12 and trial completion, defined by sum logon minutes, sum logons, and number of logon days before a logon lapse greater than or equal to 2 months.25 30–32
Patient-reported outcomes at months 4, 8 and 12 and trial completion in: (1) HRQL (short version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire;33 clinical interpretation based on a group difference of equal to or greater than 5 points),34 (2) habitual engagement in activities for living well (Evaluation of Goal-Directed Behaviours to Promote Wellbeing and Health (EUROIA)), (3) overall mental health (Mental Component Summary of the 36-item Short Form Survey),35 (4) self-care behaviours (revised 9-item European Heart Failure Self-Care Behaviour Scale),36 (5) depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire),37 (6) anxiety (7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale),38 (7) loneliness (6-item Revised University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale),39 (8) psychological well-being (Flourishing Scale),40 (9) disease management (Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item Scale),41 (10) health literacy, (11) physical activity (Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire),42 (12) perceived social support (Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Social Support Instrument),43 and (13) alcohol, nicotine, and cannabis use (Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test).44
All psychometric instruments are validated excluding the EUROIA and the measure of health literacy, both of which were developed for this trial.
Design
This is a double-arm, parallel-group, randomised superiority trial in which investigators are blinded. Participants have free access to their respective digital intervention on our online platform, hosted by the secure server at our host institution (University Health Network (UHN)). Assessments occur at baseline, months 4, 8 and 12, and trial completion. Duration of participation depends on when subjects are enrolled (figure 1). Data collection began in October 2021 and will end in August 2023, with analysis occurring from September to October 2023.
Figure 1.
Schema of trial with enrolment targets and contact schedule. eUC, enhanced usual care; ODYSSEE–vCHAT, Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support, and Health Literacy. Illustrated by R G Peiris.1 2
There are two treatment arms: ODYSSEE-vCHAT and eUC. Our platform proactively sends weekly emails to subjects inviting them to access the resources available to their group. The uniform schedule of contact across arms balances non-specific support. Participants logon to our platform using password-protected personal accounts. Only registered subjects have access to their respective programme, minimising risk of contamination across arms.
Subjects are randomised to each arm based on a ratio of 1:1 immediately following their completion of the baseline assessment. An independent researcher carries out randomisation manually by registering participants in their intervention on our platform according to permuted blocks defined by site and biological sex at birth. Block sizes and fractions are known only by the independent researcher to reduce the predictability of patient allocation. The research team is blinded to ensure impartiality in decisions about procedures and analyses.
Data for the primary outcome are collected from provincial population-based databases in collaboration with the Institute for the Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Data collection for secondary outcomes is obtained via psychometric questionnaires housed on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap©) on the secure UHN server. Questionnaires are accessed through a hyperlink that is emailed to participants at each assessment.
Criteria for participation
Patients are eligible to participate if they meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) biologically born males and females who are at least 18 years old and diagnosed with HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF) corresponding to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II-IV for 3 or more months prior to enrolment; (2) left ventricular EF less than or equal to 40% with documentation by ventriculography or quantitative echocardiography; (3) no worsening of HF for 1 month prior to recruitment, as determined by a referring physician; (4) medical treatment adhering to Canadian Cardiovascular Society guideline-directed therapy45 for at least 1 month prior to enrolment; (5) oral and written comprehension of English; (6) personal access to a computer and the Internet; and (7) informed written consent (online supplemental appendix A).
bmjopen-2021-059635supp001.pdf (3.3MB, pdf)
Exclusion criteria include the following: (1) HF with midrange or preserved EF (the high rate of non-cardiac mortality46 would confound our evaluation of ODYSSEE-vCHAT); (2) advanced surgical therapies (eg, heart transplantation or implantation of a left ventricular assist device) within 3 months of enrolment; (3) diagnosis of severe comorbidity that prohibits full participation (eg, dementia, psychosis, or severe depression); and (4) HF secondary to uncorrected valvular cardiomyopathy, predominant right-sided HF, or non-cardiac disease (eg, complex congenital heart disease).
Interventions
ODYSSEE-vCHAT consists of: (1) chatrooms available 24/7, (2) weekly 30-minute presentations followed by open discussions, and (3) digital counselling resources (online supplemental appendix B, figure 1). Seven themes inform each aspect of ODYSSEE-vCHAT: (1) priorities for ‘living well’: HRQL, self-care, and COVID-19 prevention; (2) CBT-based guide for promoting HF self-care for diet, exercise, medications, and smoke-free living; (3) CBT-based guide for managing stress, anxiety, and depression with relaxation and meditation; (4) measuring ‘living well’ progress: digital tools and trackers for HRQL and self-care; (5) social activities: promoting positive mood and HRQL; (6) maintaining self-care and HRQL: staying motivated and managing triggers; and (7) stress management for significant others (figure 2). Themes rotate in an ongoing cycle so that participants have access to the full range of topics.
Figure 2.
ODYSSEE–vCHAT’s chatrooms, presentations and discussions, and counselling resources are informed by a schedule of rotating themes. HRQL, health-related quality of life; ODYSSEE–vCHAT, Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support, and Health Literacy. Illustrated by R G Peiris.1 2
bmjopen-2021-059635supp002.pdf (554.7KB, pdf)
ODYSSEE-vCHAT chatrooms are moderated by three levels of content filtering to ensure that posts meet conventional standards of ethical conduct. Level 1 is a search algorithm that is automatically updated with banned word lists. Levels 2 and 3 are carried out by patient representatives and research assistants, respectively, who regularly review messages and remove inappropriate content.
ODYSSEE-vCHAT presentations and discussions are hosted weekly on the Zoom Web-conferencing application, which is compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Presentations of approximately 30 minutes by healthcare professionals and patient representatives feature an MI-based communication style that is followed by a discussion segment for the remainder of the 60-minute session. The MI-based communication style evokes intrinsic motivation for HF self-care adherence by validating patient experiences, encouraging identification of self-care goals, and resolving ambivalence for behavioural change. Subjects’ cameras are turned off to protect their privacy; however, they may turn on their microphone to contribute to the discussion. The meetings are recorded and uploaded to our private YouTube channel. Hyperlinks to the videos are posted on our platform for participants to access at any time. Patients who do not wish for their voice to be included in the recordings are encouraged to use the chat function on Zoom. Additionally, subjects are invited to submit comments on the topics discussed in the meetings as audio or video recordings (those who wish to remain anonymous in the ODYSSEE-vCHAT community are encouraged to submit audio recordings rather than videos). These comments, up to 1 minute in length, affirm the active role of patients as they share personal milestones with the virtual community. Submissions are screened for appropriateness of content and posted to our private YouTube channel. Hyperlinks to the videos are shared on our platform.
ODYSSEE-vCHAT’s digital counselling resources are delivered using an MI-based communication style and include educational pages (online supplemental appendix B, figure 1), videos (eg, guides for self-care behaviour, dramatic vignettes to reflect and validate patient experiences, and peer discussions), and interactive tools and trackers to monitor self-care behaviours (online supplemental appendix B, figure 2). All materials are available on initial logon and are organised by the seven themes (figure 2). eUC provides educational resources on HF and self-care behaviours that are reflective of content found on websites for professional health organisations such as the Heart Failure Society of Canada, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology. The topics covered pertain to symptoms, medical treatments, and recommendations for self-care (active living and exercise, diet, medication adherence, weight monitoring, smoke-free living, immunisations and vaccinations, stress management, and psychosocial support). All materials are available on initial logon. Subjects are expected to view this condition as an enhanced treatment as it consists of resources above and beyond the usual standard of care.25 30–32
bmjopen-2021-059635supp003.pdf (338.6KB, pdf)
Sample size estimate
The sample size estimate considers ODYSSEE-vCHAT’s usability and efficacy. In terms of usability, the CHF-CePPORT25 trial achieved moderate programme adherence over 12 months (median sessions accessed=61%), with greater logon time for digital counselling (median=381 minutes, 95% CI 321-441) versus eUC (median=229 minutes, 95% CI 187-270), p<0.001. The sample to detect this effect with a two-group design, a type 1 error of 5%, and power of 80% was N=114. With 14.7% adjustment for withdrawal or attrition (6.5% patients withdrew and 8.2% were lost to follow-up), our sample estimate is N=131. To account for efficacy, we considered a trial by Krum et. al,47 in which structured telehealth support reduced a composite index of all-cause mortality and hospitalisations over 12 months (50.6%) versus usual care (59.3%), p=0.01. A sample estimate of 142 was yielded. Using a 14.7% adjustment rate for withdrawal or attrition based on values obtained from CHF-CePPORT,25 our final total sample size estimate is 162, with a type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%.
Recruitment
We are recruiting HF patients (N=162) from cardiology clinics at academic hospitals across Toronto, Canada: UHN, Sunnybrook Hospital, and Mount Sinai Hospital. Clinical staff who are aware of the inclusion and exclusion criteria initiate contact with eligible patients. On receiving verbal consent to be approached, the research team contacts patients in person or by telephone to discuss the trial and obtain written informed consent (online supplemental appendix A). Informed consent occurs either in person at participating clinics or virtually through REDCap and with a research team member on the telephone. The trial is also advertised to HF patients who are not registered at a participating clinic through patient education websites, posters, and mass emails. Patients who contact the research team are screened for eligibility before undergoing informed consent as noted previously. Participants will be recruited continuously over a period of 18 months until the target sample size is obtained.
Analysis
A time-to-event analysis using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model will evaluate the primary outcome. Potential confounders (eg, age, gender, ethnicity, NYHA class, and depression) will be selected using forward (p<0.05) and backward (p<0.10) stepwise selection.
The Cox proportional hazards model will assess individual components of the composite index. A multivariable Poisson model will determine whether ODYSSEE-vCHAT versus eUC is associated with greater engagement with self-care materials. Each model will be adjusted for baseline assessments for each endpoint and potential confounders, noted previously. Generalised linear models will evaluate patient-reported outcomes, and significant interactions will use Bonferroni post hoc tests for relevant subgroups. T- or Chi-squared tests will examine differences in sociodemographic baseline characteristics (eg, gender, ethnicity, and education level). All planned analyses are defined as intention-to-treat as participants will be retained to the group to which they were randomised and data obtained from all subjects will be included, regardless of protocol adherence. Missing data due to withdrawal or death will be excluded from analyses. For missing data not due to withdrawal or death, we will determine if data are missing at random and, if so, resolve using multiple imputation.
Management
All data are stored on a password-protected account on the secure UHN server for 10 years following trial completion. Subject anonymity and confidentiality are preserved. Participants are issued a tracking number when identifying information is transmitted for analysis. In keeping with an agreement that coinvestigators from participating sites have signed with the UHN to share data for their patients, transmission occurs via encryption over the Internet. Only aggregate data will be published. Access to trial data is denied to persons outside the research team. Research team members have signed a contract ensuring that confidential information is not disclosed to outside parties. Access to the laboratory is given to authorised personnel only. A Data Monitoring Committee composed of a single researcher, independent of the sponsor and free of competing interests, oversees the trial’s methodological rigour.
A Steering Committee will adjudicate outcomes for primary and secondary endpoints during the final month of each year. Membership includes experts on the research team in statistics and methodology, as well as a patient representative. This group meets quarterly to review ODYSSEE-vCHAT’s progress and protocol compliance and to recommend or approve follow-up actions to any adverse incidents. On consenting, participants are informed that responsibility for their care rests solely with their healthcare team and that ODYSSEE-vCHAT is complementary to their medical care (online supplemental appendix A). Notification of any adverse events will be forwarded to the patient’s referring physician for treatment at their respective institution.
Any modifications to the protocol that may impact the trial’s design, procedures, objectives, sample size, and/or the potential benefit or safety of subjects will require a formal amendment to the protocol. Amendments will be submitted for approval to the research ethics boards (REBs) at participating sites prior to implementation. The trial’s registry will be updated accordingly (table 1).
Table 1.
Trial registration data
| Data category | Information |
| Registry and identifying information | ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04966104 |
| Date of registration | 28 August 2021 |
| Secondary identifying numbers | REB 20–5960, REB 5117, REB 21–022–E, PJT173222 |
| Source of monetary support | CIHR |
| Contact for public and scientific queries | R P Nolan1 2 |
| Public title | ODYSSEE–vCHAT pilot trial for chronic HF |
| Scientific title | Automated digital counselling with social network support as a novel intervention for patients with HF: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
| Country of recruitment | Canada |
| Health condition studied | HF |
| Interventions | ODYSSEE–vCHAT: chatrooms, presentations and discussions, and digital counselling resources |
| eUC: educational resources | |
| Key inclusion and exclusion criteria | Inclusion criteria: 18 years and older, HF with reduced EF (NYHA classes II–IV), left ventricular EF ≤ to 40%, fluent in English, access to a computer and the Internet |
| Exclusion criteria: HF with preserved EF, advanced surgical therapies within 3 months of enrolment, severe comorbidities | |
| Study type | Randomised intervention model; parallel assignment masking; single–blind (research personnel); clinical phase II pilot trial |
| Date of first enrollment | July 2021 |
| Target sample size | 162 |
| Recruitment status | Recruiting |
| Primary outcome | Composite index of incident all-cause mortality, all-cause ED visits, and HF–related hospitalisations (time frame: 22 months) |
| Key secondary outcomes | Engagement with self-care materials (time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 22 months), patient-reported outcomes of health status (time frame: 4, 8, 12 and 22 months) |
All items from the WHO Trial Registration Data Set.72
CIHR, Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ED, emergency department; EF, ejection fraction; eUC, enhanced usual care; HF, heart failure; NYHA, New York Heart Association; ODYSSEE–vCHAT, Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self–care, Peer Support, and Health Literacy; REB, research ethics board; UHN, University Health Network.
Trial conduct may be audited by the UHN’s REB, independent from investigators and the sponsor, to ensure that laws and guidelines are followed. The trial protocol is written according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials reporting guidelines.48
Compliance, withdrawal, and discontinuation
Compliance issues may arise from a patient’s perception that the response burden is disproportionate to the benefit. However, subjects are made aware during informed consent (online supplemental appendix A) that they are provided with resources that are above and beyond the standard of care and that the information learnt from this trial may help us further develop a digital counselling application to help HF patients better manage their condition. We facilitate assessment completion by email reminders and scheduling appointments to assist over the telephone, if needed.
Participants are informed during consent that they may withdraw at any time, for any reason, without repercussion to their medical care (online supplemental appendix A). All information collected up to the point of withdrawal are included in analysis. No new information is collected after that point.
Discontinuation may occur on request by a subject’s referring physician if they deem that it is not advisable for the patient to continue participation.
Discussion
ODYSSEE-vCHAT versus eUC is hypothesised to show an improvement in a composite index of incident all-cause mortality, all-cause ED visits, and HF-related hospitalisation at trial completion. This is based on evidence that counselling for HF self-care behaviours49–51 improves self-care adherence and that self-care adherence is positively linked to clinical outcomes for longevity and HRQL.12–17 Our CHF-CePPORT trial25 found that, compared to an enhanced control arm (similar to the eUC condition in the present trial), automated digital counselling for HF self-care evoked greater engagement with self-care materials over 12 months. Furthermore, engagement with self-care materials was associated with better HRQL for the digital counselling arm only. ODYSSEE-vCHAT builds on CHF-CePPORT25 by supplementing its automated digital counselling method with social networking to promote self-care learning through peer support26 27 and to reinforce positive role modelling through presentations.28 Peer support improves self-care adherence,52 such as taking medications,53 and is negatively linked with hospital admissions.54 The social network component may also increase HRQL55 while reducing perceived social isolation,56 which is expected to be a shared experienced of participants given the lockdowns and social distancing practices of the COVID-19 pandemic.
In response to a report published by the Institute of Medicine calling for healthcare to be guided by patient needs, preferences, and values,57 hospitals have incorporated patient-centred care into their service design.58 Patient-centred care empowers individuals to become more knowledgeable about their diagnosis, better manage their symptoms, and practice self-care behaviours. ODYSSEE-vCHAT aims to improve clinical outcomes and psychosocial functioning using a patient-centred approach to counselling for self-care. Studies on patient-centred self-care education for chronic conditions show that individualised feedback related to circumstance, lifestyle, and medical therapy improves self-care adherence.59–61 For example, personalised instruction for HF self-care motivates patients to practice regular self-measurements of blood pressure, pulse rate, and weight.62 ODYSSEE-vCHAT enables patients to connect HF self-care goals with individual needs, preferences, and values through identifying personal goals, setting targets, and tracking progress.
A potential limitation of ODYSSEE-vCHAT is its inaccessibility to individuals with poor computer literacy. The average HF patient is older than those with other chronic illnesses,63 posing digital usability challenges. Furthermore, older generations tend to rely on handheld devices, and optimal viewing of ODYSSEE-vCHAT is currently available on desktops and tablets due to financial limitations. However, in a study that assessed attitudes about home monitoring and technology for HF,64 patients reported having significant others who could help them access digital programmes. The research team also provides technical assistance over the telephone, if needed. Moreover, future development of the intervention will include a user-friendly mobile application. An interesting trend to note is that the Baby Boomer generation will be the largest geriatric cohort to date,65 making the digital-based nature of this intervention increasingly ideal as the HF prevalence continues to rise.66
Another potential limitation of ODYSSEE-vCHAT is its generalisability to patients of ethnic minority groups due to language barriers. Approximately 22% of the Canadian population belongs to an ethnic minority group.67 HF patients of ethnic minority groups experience worse clinical outcomes than their Caucasian counterparts68 69 and adhere less to self-care behaviours.70 71 ODYSSEE-vCHAT does not currently accommodate for non-English speakers due to financial constraints. However, representation of visible ethnic minorities is included in the digital counselling materials, presenting potential role models for ethnic minority participants. Future advances to the programme will include translation into other languages.
Patient and public involvement
The social network component of ODYSSEE-vCHAT fosters a sense of community and encourages engagement through chatrooms, weekly meetings, and audio or video comments. Digital counselling resources are expected to promote intrinsic motivation for self-care as participants identify personal goals, set targets, and track their progress. Patient representatives, who are members of the research team and the steering committee, act as hosts for presentations in the ODYSSEE-vCHAT intervention. They offer insights on the weekly theme from a first-hand experience.
Ethics and dissemination
Trial procedures have been reviewed and approved by the REBs at the UHN (20-5960), Sunnybrook Hospital (5117), and Mount Sinai Hospital (21-022-E). Public access to the full protocol is available at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04966104). Subjects who are eligible based on inclusion and exclusion criteria are required to provide informed consent (online supplemental appendix A) either in person or online.
We will collaborate with researchers and stakeholders in cardiovascular and public health to establish a best-evidence pan-Canadian digital counselling service to promote HF self-care and HRQL. We will present findings from this trial to patient representative groups and professional societies in formal and peer-reviewed settings. Topics for presentation or publication will be shared with coinvestigators, who will be requested to provide input. Findings will inform clinical guidelines and digital healthcare policies. We will share the results with the public through social media and press releases.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to J Wong, G Yang, C Watson, K S Gunson, G Fezza, S Sansone, K Xiao, and E Liu for their assistance in administrative and management tasks, graphic design of digital materials, patient recruitment, and data collection. We are also grateful to the technical support of the UHN-TECHNA Institute for the development of the Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support, and Health Literacy (ODYSSEE-vCHAT) programme.
Footnotes
Contributors: All authors have contributed to the writing of this paper and the review of its contents.
Funding: This work is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; PJT173222). The CIHR is not involved in the study design, the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of reports, or the decision to submit reports for publication. Tel: (613) 954-1968. E-mail: support-soutien@cihr-irsc.gc.ca.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient and public involvement: Patients representatives are involved in the conduct and oversight of this research. Refer to the Methods and Discussion sections for further details.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Citation: Peiris R G, Ross H, Chan C T, et al. Automated digital counselling with social network support as a novel intervention for patients with heart failure: protocol for randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022;0:e059635. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059635
Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
References
- 1.Braunwald E. Heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2013;1:1–20. 10.1016/j.jchf.2012.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, AS G. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2016 update: a report from the American heart association. Circ 2016;133:e38–60. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chun S, Tu JV, Wijeysundera HC, et al. Lifetime analysis of hospitalizations and survival of patients newly admitted with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2012;5:414–21. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.964791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taylor CJ, Ordóñez-Mena JM, Roalfe AK, et al. Trends in survival after a diagnosis of heart failure in the United Kingdom 2000-2017: population based cohort study. BMJ 2019;364:l223. 10.1136/bmj.l223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kaminsky LA, Tuttle MS. Functional assessment of heart failure patients. Heart Fail Clin 2015;11:29–36. 10.1016/j.hfc.2014.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kinugawa S, Takada S, Matsushima S, et al. Skeletal muscle abnormalities in heart failure. Int Heart J 2015;56:475–84. 10.1536/ihj.15-108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barker J, Smith Byrne K, Doherty A, et al. Physical activity of UK adults with chronic disease: cross-sectional analysis of accelerometer-measured physical activity in 96 706 UK Biobank participants. Int J Epidemiol 2019;48:1386–74. 10.1093/ije/dyz148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Celano CM, Villegas AC, Albanese AM, et al. Depression and anxiety in heart failure: a review. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2018;26:175–84. 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Heo S, Lennie TA, Okoli C, et al. Quality of life in patients with heart failure: ask the patients. Heart Lung 2009;38:100–8. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee DTF, Yu DSF, Woo J, et al. Health-Related quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:419–22. 10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cavalcante AMRZ, Lopes CT, Brunori EFR, et al. Self-Care behaviors in heart failure. Int J Nurs Knowl 2018;29:146–55. 10.1111/2047-3095.12170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Granger BB, Swedberg K, Ekman I, et al. Adherence to candesartan and placebo and outcomes in chronic heart failure in the CHARM programme: double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2005;366:2005–11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67760-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simpson SH, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, et al. A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality. BMJ 2006;333:15–20. 10.1136/bmj.38875.675486.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rasmussen JN, Chong A, Alter DA. Relationship between adherence to evidence-based pharmacotherapy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2007;297:177–86. 10.1001/jama.297.2.177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Khaw K-T, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med 2008;5:e12. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Musekamp G, Schuler M, Seekatz B, et al. Does improvement in self-management skills predict improvement in quality of life and depressive symptoms? A prospective study in patients with heart failure up to one year after self-management education. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017;17:51–60. 10.1186/s12872-017-0486-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Riegel B, Moser DK, Anker SD. State of the science: promoting self–care in persons with heart failure: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circ 2009;120:1141–63. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Inglis SC, Clark RA, McAlister FA. Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;8:CD007228. 10.1002/14651858.CD007228.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Marti CN, Georgiopoulou VV, Giamouzis G, et al. Patient-Reported selective adherence to heart failure self-care recommendations: a prospective cohort study: the Atlanta cardiomyopathy Consortium. Congest Heart Fail 2013;19:16–24. 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2012.00308.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Masterson Creber R, Patey M, Lee CS, et al. Motivational interviewing to improve self-care for patients with chronic heart failure: MITI-HF randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99:256–64. 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Eldar S, Esser NM, Hofmann SG. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy to Promote Self-Management. In: Martz E, ed. Promoting self-management of chronic health conditions: theories and practice. Oxford. UK: Oxford University Press, 2018: 31–57. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Freedland KE, Carney RM, Rich MW. Cognitive behavior therapy for depression and self–care in heart failure patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Int Med 2015;175:1–10. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dennis C-L. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2003;40:321–32. 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00092-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Omura K, Ito M, Eguchi E, et al. The effect of peer support groups on self-care for haemophilic patients with HIV in Japan. Haemophilia 2013;19:876–81. 10.1111/hae.12222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nolan RP, Ross HJ, Farkouh ME, et al. Automated e-counseling for chronic heart failure: CHF-CePPORT trial. Circ Heart Fail 2021;14:e007073. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Riegel B, Carlson B. Is individual peer support a promising intervention for persons with heart failure? J Cardiovasc Nurs 2004;19:174–83. 10.1097/00005082-200405000-00006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gómez-Pardo E, Fernández-Alvira JM, Vilanova M, et al. A comprehensive lifestyle peer group-based intervention on cardiovascular risk factors: the randomized controlled fifty-fifty program. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:476–85. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.van Woudenberg TJ, Simoski B, Fernandes de Mello Araújo E, et al. Identifying influence agents that promote physical activity through the simulation of social network interventions: agent-based modeling study. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e12914. 10.2196/12914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lakkireddy DR, Chung MK, Gopinathannair R. Guidance for cardiac electrophysiology during the COVID-19 pandemic from the heart rhythm Society COVID-19 Task force; electrophysiology section of the American College of cardiology; and the electrocardiography and arrhythmias Committee of the Council on clinical cardiology, American heart association. Circ Heart Fail 2020;141:e823–31. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nolan RP, Payne AY, Ross H, et al. An Internet-based counseling intervention with Email reminders that promotes self-care in adults with chronic heart failure: randomized controlled trial protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2014;3:e5–18. 10.2196/resprot.2957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Payne AY, Surikova J, Liu S, et al. Usability testing of an Internet-based e-counseling platform for adults with chronic heart failure. JMIR Hum Factors 2015;2:e7–19. 10.2196/humanfactors.4125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fezza G, Sansone S, Surikova J. Patient engagement with an e-counseling platform is enhanced over 12 months in the CHF-CePPORT trial. Can J Cardiol 2018;91:S148–9. 10.2196/humanfactors.4125 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, et al. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1245–55. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00531-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Spertus J, Peterson E, Conard MW, et al. Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods. Am Heart J 2005;150:707–15. 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ware JE. Sf-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;25:3130–9. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jaarsma T, Årestedt KF, Mårtensson J, et al. The European heart failure self-care behaviour scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:99–105. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfn007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, et al. The patient health questionnaire somatic, anxiety, and depressive symptom scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2010;32:345–59. 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Pinyopornpanish M, et al. Development and validation of a 6-item revised UCLA loneliness scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis. Br J Health Psychol 2020;25:233–56. 10.1111/bjhp.12404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W. New measures of well-being: flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res 2009;39:247–66. 10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, et al. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract 2001;4:256–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Amireault S, Godin G, Lacombe J, et al. The use of the Godin-Shephard leisure-time physical activity questionnaire in oncology research: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015;15:60. 10.1186/s12874-015-0045-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vaglio J, Conard M, Poston WS, et al. Testing the performance of the ENRICHD social support instrument in cardiac patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:24. 10.1186/1477-7525-2-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor T, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for illicit drugs linked to the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (assist) in clients recruited from primary health-care settings in four countries. RCT 2012;107:957–66. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03740.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ezekowitz JA, O'Meara E, McDonald MA. Comprehensive update of the Canadian cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of heart failure. Can J Cardiol 2017;2017:1342–433. 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.08.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zile MR, Gaasch WH, Anand IS, et al. Mode of death in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction: results from the irbesartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction study (I-Preserve) trial. Circulation 2010;121:1393–405. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.909614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Krum H, Forbes A, Yallop J, et al. Telephone support to rural and remote patients with heart failure: the chronic heart failure assessment by telephone (chat) study. Cardiovasc Ther 2013;31:230–7. 10.1111/1755-5922.12009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. Spirit 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Riegel B, Dickson VV, Hoke L, et al. A motivational counseling approach to improving heart failure self-care: mechanisms of effectiveness. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006;21:232–41. 10.1097/00005082-200605000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Nolan RP, Payne A, Tanaka R, et al. Patient engagement with E-COUNSELLING promotes self-care in heart failure. Can J Cardiol 2016;32:S89. 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.121 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Greenberger HM, Dennis C, Andreopoulos E. Improved heart failure self–care in a Medicare population receiving virtual behavioural therapy: a health plan-provider collaboration. Circ Heart Fail 2019;140:A11408. 10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.11408 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Graven LJ, Grant JS. Social support and self-care behaviors in individuals with heart failure: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2014;51:320–33. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wu J-R, Frazier SK, Rayens MK, et al. Medication adherence, social support, and event-free survival in patients with heart failure. Health Psychol 2013;32:637–46. 10.1037/a0028527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Guallar-Castillón P, Herrera MC, et al. Social network as a predictor of hospital readmission and mortality among older patients with heart failure. J Card Fail 2006;12:621–7. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.06.471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chung ML, Moser DK, Lennie TA, et al. Perceived social support predicted quality of life in patients with heart failure, but the effect is mediated by depressive symptoms. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1555–63. 10.1007/s11136-012-0294-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Heisler M, Halasyamani L, Resnicow K, et al. "I am not alone": the feasibility and acceptability of interactive voice response-facilitated telephone peer support among older adults with heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 2007;13:149–57. 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2007.06412.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.National Research Council . Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nazario RJ. Medical humanities as tools for the teaching of patient-centered care. J Hosp Med 2009;4:512–4. 10.1002/jhm.480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Effing T, Monninkhof E, van der Valk P. Self-Management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD002990. 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lambert-Kerzner A, Del Giacco EJ, Fahdi IE, et al. Patient-Centered adherence intervention after acute coronary syndrome hospitalization. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:571–6. 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.962290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shepard JA, Gonder-Frederick L, Vajda K, et al. Patient perspectives on personalized glucose Advisory systems for type 1 diabetes management. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:858–61. 10.1089/dia.2012.0122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Anderson C, Deepak BV, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, et al. Benefits of comprehensive inpatient education and discharge planning combined with outpatient support in elderly patients with congestive heart failure. Congest Heart Fail 2005;11:315–21. 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2005.04458.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Christiansen MN, Køber L, Weeke P, et al. Age-Specific trends in incidence, mortality, and comorbidities of heart failure in Denmark, 1995 to 2012. Circulation 2017;135:1214–23. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Seto E, Leonard KJ, Masino C, et al. Attitudes of heart failure patients and health care providers towards mobile phone-based remote monitoring. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e55. 10.2196/jmir.1627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wan H, Goodkind D, Kowal PR. An aging world, 2016. Available: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p95-16-1.pdf [Accessed Oct 2021].
- 66.Bragazzi NL, Zhong W, Shu J, et al. Burden of heart failure and underlying causes in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2017. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021;28:1682–90. 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Canada S. Immigration and ethnocultural diversity: key results from the 2016 census., 2017. Available: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/171025/dq171025b-eng.htm [Accessed Oct 2021].
- 68.Dries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ, et al. Racial differences in the outcome of left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 1999;340:609–16. 10.1056/NEJM199902253400804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Peterson PN, Campagna EJ, Maravi M, et al. Acculturation and outcomes among patients with heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2012;5:160–6. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Artinian NT, Magnan M, Sloan M, et al. Self-Care behaviors among patients with heart failure. Heart Lung 2002;31:161–72. 10.1067/mhl.2002.123672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Riegel B, Driscoll A, Suwanno J, et al. Heart failure self-care in developed and developing countries. J Card Fail 2009;15:508–16. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.World Health Organization . Trial registration data set (version 1.3.1), 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform/network/who-data-set [Accessed Nov 2021].
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
bmjopen-2021-059635supp001.pdf (3.3MB, pdf)
bmjopen-2021-059635supp002.pdf (554.7KB, pdf)
bmjopen-2021-059635supp003.pdf (338.6KB, pdf)


